Star Athletica, LLC v. Varsity Brands, Inc.
Holding
A feature incorporated into the design of a useful article is eligible for copyright protection under the Copyright Act of 1976 only if the feature (1) can be perceived as a two- or three-dimensional work of art separate from the useful article, and (2) would qualify as a protectable pictorial, graphic or sculptural work -- either on its own or fixed in some other tangible medium of expression -- if it were imagined separately from the useful article into which it is incorporated; that test is satisfied here.
Judgment
Affirmed, 6-2, in an opinion by Clarence Thomas on Mar 22, 2017. Justice Ginsburg filed an opinion concurring in the judgment. Justice Breyer filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justice Kennedy joined.
Recommended Citation: Star Athletica, LLC v. Varsity Brands, Inc., SCOTUSblog, https://www.scotusblog.com/cases/star-athletica-llc-v-varsity-brands-inc/