cite and blockquote – reloaded | HTML5 Doctor
The definition of the cite element (and the blockquote element) has been changed for the better in HTML5 …at least in the W3C version anyway.
I’m getting behind Oli’s proposal to allow non-quoted footers within blockquotes in HTML. Here’s where I quote the design principles to support his case.
The definition of the cite element (and the blockquote element) has been changed for the better in HTML5 …at least in the W3C version anyway.
A good explanation of HTML5’s sectioning content and outline algorithm.
Bruce sits down for a chat with Hixie. This is a good insight into the past and present process behind HTML.
Tantek has put together a wiki page to document the arguments for and against adding a new “main” element to HTML.
Bruce’s thoughts on the proposed inclusion of a “content” or “maincontent” element in HTML5.
Personally, I don’t think there’s much point in adding a new element when there’s an existing attribute (role=”main”) that does exactly the same thing.
Also, I don’t see much point in adding an element that can only be used once and only once in a document. However, if a “content” or “maincontent” element could be used inside any sectioning content (section, article, nav, aside), then I could see it being far more useful.
Agreeing and disagreeing with Divya.
Who knows where the time element goes?
Once again, the data shows confusion between sections and articles in HTML5.
Quit yer bitchin’
Tabulating the results from a workshop.