đŸ“ș Chernobyl

Watched The truth about Chernobyl? I saw it with my own eyes
 from the Guardian

Kim Willsher reported on the world’s worst nuclear disaster from the Soviet Union. HBO’s TV version only scratches the surface, she says

In reviewing the show, Cameron Williams argues that,

Today, scientists are trying to warn us of an existential threat to our health and safety: climate change. Once again, government drags its feet.

If we take anything from Chernobyl, it should be this: put science before politics.

In 2019, we may have grasped the extreme dangers of radiation, but the war on the truth is ongoing — it’s eternal.

One of the challenges that this show highlights is the challenges associated with telling a clear narrative. Although there is no debate about Chernobyl and the disaster that occurred, making sense of the how and why is a bit more difficult. This was highlighted by the fictional scientist who combined the rolls of a number of scientists who go unmentioned.

2 responses on “đŸ“ș Chernobyl”

  1. Another month has flown on by. My family and I have just gotten back from some time away in Vanuatu. I think it is fair to say that Google and Uber have some work to do there in regards to implementing self-driving cars. It felt like there are two maps, one plotting where to go, the other documenting the multitude of pot-holes. I must admit it was nice to stop.
    In regards to work, there are always changes going on. The focus though continues to be automating the process for on-boarding schools. I wrote a longer reflection about that here. My biggest takeaway is that:

    Too often the conversation around technology is around efficiency – replacing work and saving time. However, my experience with supporting schools with setting up reports, timetables and attendance, and technology in general, has me feeling it often changes things. This touches on the reality that technology is a system. In saving in once spot, it often adds to another. As always, comments welcomes.

    At the same time we are also grappling with how to best support schools already on. This is especially challenging when it comes to tasks like setting up a timetable that schools may only do once a year.
    Personally, I have continued reading Why We Can’t Write. I also worked on my site. This included improving the search thanks to some help from John Johnston, as well as fix up the header images. In regards to my listening, I have been really getting into Lana Del Ray, Montaigne, Charli XCX, M83 and G Flip, as well as diving into the Switched on Pop podcast. I also watched the Chernobyl miniseries.
    Learning and Teaching
    Children’s books are tackling dark and taboo topics. Morris Gleitzman says that’s nothing to be afraid of
    Morris Gleitzman and Jo Lampert spoke as part of a panel discussing the place of literature to tackle complex topics.
    Why the Periodic Table of Elements Is More Important Than Ever
    Bloomberg collects together a number of essays exploring the various elements of the periodic table.
    Re-imagining Education for Democracy with Stewart Riddle
    Stewart Riddle discusses the issue of democracy in education in an interview with Cameron Malcher on the TER Podcast.
    Learning Science: The Problem With Data, And How You Can Measure Anything
    Julian Stodd provides a useful introduction to quantitative and qualitative data.
    One for the books: the unlikely renaissance of libraries in the digital age
    Often the discussion around the future of libraries focuses on technology and spaces, however Jane Cadzow’s deep dive uncovers the more human side of libraries throughout Australia.
    Technology
    The Perfect User
    Cherie Lacey, Catherine Caudwell and Alex Beattie discuss the ironic templated sense of identity perpetuated by the humane technology movement.
    Privacy matters because it empowers us all
    Carissa VĂ©liz pushes back on the idea that anyone can say they have ‘nothing to hide’. Whether it be attention, money, reputation or identity, she argues that we all have something worth getting at.
    EdTech Resistance
    Ben Williamson provides a broad survey of the different ways that people have been critically engaging with technology in education.
    Apps Script Pulse
    Martin Hawksey has created a site to collate different Google App Script projects.
    The Psychology of Silicon Valley
    Antony Funnell speaks with Katy Cook on the RN Future Tense podcast about the many influences on Silicon Valley.
    Reflection
    Media Accounting 101: Appholes and Contracts
    Craig Mod explores the agreements we make that we may not always be aware that we are making.
    Misogyny, male rage and the words men use to describe Greta Thunberg
    Camilla Nelson and Meg Vertigan survey the way in which males have responded to Greta Thunberg.
    Kate O’Halloran made a mistake on Twitter. But admitting it wasn’t enough for trolls
    Kate O’Halloran reflections on her experience of being trolled online after a mistake made on Twitter.
    The Cost of Next-Day Delivery: How Amazon Escapes The Blame For Its Deadly Last Mile
    Caroline O’Donovan and Ken Bensinger provide a picture of what is involved in having things delivered the next day.
    Malcolm Gladwell Reaches His Tipping Point
    In a review of Malcolm Gladwell’s new book Talking to Strangers, Andrew Ferguson unpacks Gladwell’s pivot from rules and biases to unanswered questions.
    Focus on 
 MIT and Jeffrey Epstein
    Image via “BrickForge Animals” by Dunechaser https://flickr.com/photos/dunechaser/1431005928 is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA
    Justin Peters maps the history associated with MIT, the birth of the Media Lab and the choice to soil its specialness, rather than support activists like Aaron Swartz. Evgeny Morozov labels it as moral bankruptcy. Audrey Watters calls it a plutocratic horror show. James Bridle questions the ethics of the Media Lab and their history in building products to improve people’s lives, only to then pivot into market gains. Ronan Farrow reports on the steps Joi Ito and others took to conceal Epstein’s involvement with the Media Lab. Siva Vaidhyanathan argues that Epstein’s intent in donating was not whitewashing, but rather to gain access to powerful men. Anand Giridharadas outlines why he resigned as a juror for MIT’s Disobedience Award. Heather Gold reflects on the problem of gender and power. danah boyd discusses the great reckoning ahead, where we are faced with the challenge of building rather than breaking the web.
    Read Write Respond #045
    So that was September for me, how about you? As always, happy to hear.

    Cover Image via JustLego101

  2. Midnight in Chernobyl: The Untold Story of the World’s Greatest Nuclear Disaster (2019) by Adam Higginbotham is a history of the Chernobyl nuclear disaster that occurred in Soviet Ukraine in 1986. It won the Andrew Carnegie Medal for Excellence in Nonfiction in 2020. Higginbotham spent more than a decade interviewing eyewitnesses and reviewing documents from the disaster, including some that were recently declassified.[1] Higginbotham considers it the first English-language account that is close to the truth.[1]

    Source: Midnight in Chernobyl – Wikipedia

    I stumbled upon Adam Higginbotham’s Midnight in Chernobyl: The Untold Story of the World’s Greatest Nuclear Disaster via Libby. I decided to read it with all the discussion around embracing nuclear power in Australia as coal is wound down, as well as big tech’s embrace of small reactors to run data centres. I had wondered if I was exaggerating with regards to my emotive response to the dangers and drawbacks associated with embracing nuclear power.

    It is strange reading something where you already know the outcome, especially after watching the HBO series, yet Higginbotham writes in such a captivating manner that still you do not want to stop.

    Adam Higginbotham’s “Midnight in Chernobyl” is a gripping, miss-your-subway-stop read. The details of the disaster pile up inexorably. They include worn control rod switches, the 2,000-ton reactor lid nicknamed Elena, a core so huge that understanding its behavior was impossible. Politicians lacked the technical knowledge to take action, while scientists who had the knowledge feared to provide it lest they lose their jobs or lives.

    Source: Looking Again at the Chernobyl Disaster by Robert P. Crease

    Although I was often left wondering about how we actually know what was said. For example, clearly the workers did not speak in English. He also does a good job of balancing between the complex technology and the politics.

    Higginbotham describes young workers who were promoted swiftly to positions of terrific responsibility. In an especially glaring example of entrenched cronyism, the Communist Party elevated an ideologically copacetic electrical engineer to the position of deputy plant director at Chernobyl: To make up for a total lack of experience with atomic energy, he took a correspondence course in nuclear physics.

    Source: An Enthralling and Terrifying History of the Nuclear Meltdown at Chernobyl by Jennifer Szalai

    The Chernobyl disaster on April 26, 1986, feels like it is a story of one shortcut after another. Whether it be choosing the right method (water as the coolant, not graphite), wearing appropriate protective clothing, get the batteries for the dosimeter, tell your superior about the safety test, close your window, don’t run over the hoses, tell the world etc.

    Reading Midnight in Chernobyl, it feels easy to think that it would not happen here and now. We have better technology, the politics is different, but nowhere is perfect?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

To respond on your own website, enter the URL of your response which should contain a link to this post's permalink URL. Your response will then appear (possibly after moderation) on this page. Want to update or remove your response? Update or delete your post and re-enter your post's URL again. (Find out more about Webmentions.)