Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/Blocks and protections

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Shortcuts: COM:AN/B • COM:AN/P • COM:RFPP

This is a place where users can communicate with administrators, or administrators with one another. You can report vandalism, problematic users, or anything else that needs an administrator's intervention. Do not report child pornography or other potentially illegal content here; e-mail legal-reports@wikimedia.org instead. If reporting threatened harm to self or others also email emergency@wikimedia.org.

Vandalism
[new section] 		User problems
[new section] 		Blocks and protections
[new section] 		Other
[new section]

Report users for clear cases of vandalism. Block requests for any other reason should be reported to the blocks and protections noticeboard.


Report disputes with users that require administrator assistance. Further steps are listed at resolve disputes.


Reports that do not suit the vandalism noticeboard may be reported here. Requests for page protection/unprotection could also be requested here.


Other reports that require administrator assistance which do not fit in any of the previous three noticeboards may be reported here. Requests for history merging or splitting should be filed at COM:HMS.

Archives
23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
118, 117, 116, 115, 114, 113, 112, 111, 110, 109, 108, 107, 106, 105, 104, 103, 102, 101, 100, 99, 98, 97, 96, 95, 94, 93, 92, 91, 90, 89, 88, 87, 86, 85, 84, 83, 82, 81, 80, 79, 78, 77, 76, 75, 74, 73, 72, 71, 70, 69, 68, 67, 66, 65, 64, 63, 62, 61, 60, 59, 58, 57, 56, 55, 54, 53, 52, 51, 50, 49, 48, 47, 46, 45, 44, 43, 42, 41, 40, 39, 38, 37, 36, 35, 34, 33, 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
40, 39, 38, 37, 36, 35, 34, 33, 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
98, 97, 96, 95, 94, 93, 92, 91, 90, 89, 88, 87, 86, 85, 84, 83, 82, 81, 80, 79, 78, 77, 76, 75, 74, 73, 72, 71, 70, 69, 68, 67, 66, 65, 64, 63, 62, 61, 60, 59, 58, 57, 56, 55, 54, 53, 52, 51, 50, 49, 48, 47, 46, 45, 44, 43, 42, 41, 40, 39, 38, 37, 36, 35, 34, 33, 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
Translate this page
COMMONS DISCUSSION PAGES

Note

  • For page protection requests, please state protection type, file name, and proposed protection time span. See also: Protection Policy.
  • Before proposing a user be blocked, please familiarize yourself with the Commons' Blocking Policy.
  • Remember to sign and date all comments using four tildes (~~~~), which translates into a signature and a time stamp.
  • Notify the user(s) concerned via their user talk page(s). {{subst:Discussion-notice|noticeboard=COM:AN/B|thread=|reason=}} is available for this.
  • Administrators: Please make a note if a report is dealt with, to avoid unnecessary responses by other admins.


Yara Naziya

Continues to (re-)upload copyvios after final warning. --bjh21 (talk) 17:28, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Blocked for 1 week. Bastique ☎ let's talk! 17:39, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Inaporpite content

File:SQL - DELETE.jpg is Inaporpite. They kept posting more Inaporpite content. Wikan Boy 123 (talk) 02:43, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Convenience link: File:SQL - DELETE.jpg. Certainly NSFW. Not sure whether it is in or out of scope. Certainly not a good name for the file (would not lead you to expect nudity). Commons "is not censored," which is to say that if it is considered in scope, then nudity as such is not a reason to delete it. - Jmabel ! talk 03:36, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
would you be opposed to a rule against nominating Exey Pantelees photos for deletion cuz this getting tiring Trade (talk) 17:00, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
As for your speedy deletion request on the basis that it is a copyvio: it is appropriately licensed in Flickr, and is certainly consistent enough with the account's other content to strongly suggest that the license is legitimate. - Jmabel ! talk 03:40, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
However, I will say that at a quick look, User:Jim Bangs uploads all appear to be highly sexualized NSFW images of women that are at best questionably in scope. - Jmabel ! talk 03:41, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm, I was somewhat bold and removed all of the deletion requesting tags; the licensing and copyright related things as misplaced (I checked the source Flickr stream: the motifs and the EXIF / camera equipment were consistent with a legitimate licensing) and the standard DR per COM:SNOW as the given rationale was already discussed and refuted. A COM:SCOPE-based DR would be a totally legitimate standard editorial process, though (but I would be rather tending towards "in scope"). Regards, Grand-Duc (talk) 03:55, 21 December 2024 (UTC) PS. I also did a rename: File:NSFW - nude woman with SQL - DELETE pun.jpg. GD[reply]
That was not a valid rename request, no point in renaming. Bedivere (talk) 19:12, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The main motif is a nude woman. Would you expect that behind the original name "SQL - DELETE.jpg", Bedivere?! The COM:FR#FR2 criterion for removing ambiguity is fitting, I think. Regards, Grand-Duc (talk) 19:22, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Introducing the file with NSFW is not okay IMO. I've refitted the title. Bedivere (talk) 19:26, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This image is from the "Geekography" image set, basically all of which have been nominated for deletion and kept multiple times. There's a bit more information, and a long list of past deletion discussions, on the category page I linked. I agree that these images are, at best, only marginally in scope... but there are other hills to die on. Omphalographer (talk) 05:24, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This particular image is used on a Russian Wikinews article, so that makes it in scope. Bedivere (talk) 05:40, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
But that would violate the WikiNews:Policy I think. Wikan Boy 123 (talk) 06:29, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nope, it doesn't. Bedivere (talk) 19:05, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. Wikan Boy is blocked and I declined unblock request. Taivo (talk) 09:45, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've also closed their deletion requests, pure trolling. Bedivere (talk) 19:11, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Request Indefinite full-protection for User:Jobeyub

Rationale: Sadece öğrenmek Jobeyub (talk) 07:08, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Jobeyub: Perhaps you can start your öğrenmek by learning not to make frivolous requests of the administrators. - Jmabel ! talk 07:33, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Pinging @Kadı, who should probably have a look at the activity of this account. - Jmabel ! talk 07:43, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done Kadı Message 08:07, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Blocks_and_protections&oldid=975362273"