Commons:Deletion requests/File:Blue winged leafbird.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Blue winged leafbird.jpg

[edit]

No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 16:48, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The uploader is a trusted contributor who tagged the image {{PD-self}} in 2006. We can safely assume this is their own work per {{Own assumed}}. Guanaco (talk) 06:14, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
{{Own assumed}} should not be inserted manually, as you can read in the documentation. The template is meant for usage by a bot and a human check is needed afterward. Assuming that somebody is the author conflicts with COM:PCP. Jcb (talk) 09:22, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Normally a bot would have applied {{Own assumed}} when adding the information template. Unfortunately someone applied {{Information}} manually without addressing source and author. Assuming without evidence conflicts with COM:PCP, but we have evidence, a clear statement by a trusted user: "I, the copyright holder of this work, release this work into the public domain." Guanaco (talk) 19:25, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
That's not an explicit statement, the template was inserted by leaving a standard checkmark in place. Jcb (talk) 20:44, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Will you also delete the millions of pictures that were uploaded with the now default CC BY-SA 4.0 license? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 20:51, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I think it's ridiculous to delete an image that is so obviously legitimately the work of the person who uploaded it, and for which their intent to grant PD-level permission is absolutely clear. It's especially ridiculous to challenge this after over a decade, expecting someone in 2006 to have conformed consistently to practices that were still rather inconsistent at the time. - Jmabel ! talk 06:19, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Good idea, just did.. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 23:43, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep: {{PD-self}} is a perfectly adequate statement of authorship, source, and copyright status. --bjh21 (talk) 10:35, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep "Assuming that somebody is the author conflicts with COM:PCP." - no policy consensus for this adversive thesis. how many old uploads with mangled metadata do you want to delete? you realize there are 300000 of them? Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 04:07, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep: I see your: «Assuming that somebody is the author conflicts with COM:PCP.» and I raise you «Assuming that somebody is lying conflicts with COM:AGF.» One more case for the mounting Jcb’s deadmin process #4. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 14:30, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    • comment except the cynicism is not confined to this admin. it's one thing to disbelieve the flickr-washers, but when it's turn against the old dependable uploaders, then it becomes farce. and it is capricious, rather than a systematic license review and improvement taskflow, we see a random, one at a time, deletion campaign, with no consideration for "in use" or "is it replaceable". it is the triumph of solecism over standards. Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 19:22, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion, as per above discussion. --Yann (talk) 12:27, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Blue_winged_leafbird.jpg&oldid=324103798"