Content deleted Content added
→Survey: Comment |
|||
Line 146:
:However I disagree with the principle of rejecting mass moves. Wikipedia should, arguably, operate on the principles of consistency and mass moves may, arguably, offer the best way to consideration of the full implications of a proposed raft of changes.
:[[User:Gregkaye|Gregkaye]] [[User talk:Gregkaye|<span style="color:Black"><big>✍</big>♪</span>]] 11:13, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
::My view is that mass moves should be taken to the project pages, not individual breed articles, particularly where there is more than one animal involved; for example, people working on cattle articles may not be watchlisting sheep, yet these RMs affect both projects. There are many more of these out there, and they affect multiple projects. [[User:Montanabw|<font color="006600">Montanabw</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Montanabw|<font color="purple">(talk)</font>]]</sup> 18:49, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
===Discussion===
| |||