Content deleted Content added
Line 332:
:2) The only way in which "revealing" info about Anittas could be construed as a threat on Cei Trei is if Cei Trei is admitting to ''being'' Anittas.
:3) The claim that I operate multiple accounts is bogus and inflammatory, and I have repeatedly said I will submit to a checkuser, even for the most frivolous claims. For the record, I have never ever interacted with Anittas and/or Cei Trei outside of our crossing paths on wikipedia, and it can be documented (indeed, I ''have'' documented) that Anittas and/or Cei Trei has/have been pestering me with unsolicited confessions, musings, taunts, and theories. [[User:Dahn|Dahn]] ([[User talk:Dahn|talk]]) 14:08, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
::I was a part of that public forum, just as Anittas was, just as Bonaparte was, and more importantly, just as another user--the key-user--was; however, a lot of private information was posted on that public forum by that key-user, along with threats and his photo in a balaclava. This is bigger than any sock-puppet accusation and I'm retreating, but I'll say one thing: if the key-user made smoe of us in the forum believe that he is you, by certain 'techniques' he used, then he's a genius for having manipulating all of us--including you. Or do you think that people come to your talk page randomly, for simply disagreeing with them on Wikipedia? Like I said, this is long past the sock-puppet disagreement and I don't know about your involvement in this (you two seem rather close), but I'm out. You won. --[[User:Cei Trei|Cei Trei]] ([[User talk:Cei Trei|talk]]) 14:14, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
| |||