FourViolas

Joined 6 October 2014

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) at 06:40, 24 November 2020 (Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:FourViolas/Archive 2) (bot). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


Latest comment: 4 years ago by MediaWiki message delivery in topic ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Welcome to my talk page! Please leave new messages at the bottom of the page, and auto-sign your name by adding four tildes (~~~~ ). I'll respond here unless you request otherwise

DYK for 2016 Massachusetts Question 3

On 14 June 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 2016 Massachusetts Question 3, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Massachusetts's Question 3 was the first U.S. ballot measure to ban the sale of animal products such as eggs and pork from intensively confined animals? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/2016 Massachusetts Question 3. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, 2016 Massachusetts Question 3), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:01, 14 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hey, long time, la mia amica!

Hey, 4V! It's very good to see you are still with us on the project after five good years now! I saw your comments at Talk:George Floyd and felt inspired to drop by and say hi. Your perspectives/policy read there suggests to me that you have become precisely the kind of nuanced and insightful editor and community member I always figured you'd be, from your earliest contributions. I hope that comes off as more sincere and flattering rather than patronizing. I just wanted to let you know, one editor to another, that I was impressed with your ability to isolate the relevant policy considerations and render them into an opinion about the best course of action that was both practical and well-written.

I'm thinking back on the timetable and trying to figure out if you are into grad work at this point? Or did you just now finish your undergrad, this last couple of months. Well, regardless where you are in your credentials, I hope some influential Harvard wordsmith didn't tempt you completely into social psychology and away from more consistently empirical pursuits. ;D I'm only having a little partisan fun, of course: whatever you have moved into, I am sure you are doing interesting and useful work. I just hope we get to keep you all the way through your post-doc and beyond! Snow let's rap 19:20, 16 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Oh sheesh, I should have looked at your user page first: seems I needn't have wondered at all if you'd moved into a practical field. Good on you--I mean, you really found the sweet spot between fascinating and intellectual rewarding subject matter, practical and myriad application, and true moral progress for all of us. Colour me increasingly impressed. Snow let's rap 19:33, 16 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Oh, I completely forgot something I intended to mention: there was a recent discussion at Talk:Dance where a new and very ambitious editor had proposed some rather substantial (but on the whole, I think probably beneficial) changes to the article. They've since seemed to have reconsidered biting off more than they can chew with the undertaking for the present time, from what I can tell--and with my current schedule, I won't be racing to fill that void any time soon--but the topics raised I think will be of interest to you. Snow let's rap 19:24, 16 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Removing cow-dog picture (discussion in Speciesism article)

Your opinion is sought here: Talk:Speciesism § Removing cow-dog picture. Rasnaboy (talk) 17:56, 6 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:46, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply