Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject History/Assessment: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
 
(10 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 30: Line 30:
Current active members:
Current active members:
* {{u|Gog the Mild}}
* {{u|Gog the Mild}}
* {{u|PrathuCoder}}


Please feel free to add your name to join!!!!
Please feel free to add your name to join!!!!
Line 43: Line 44:


===Tasks, items, notes, comments or questions===
===Tasks, items, notes, comments or questions===
* [[Kevin M. Kruse]] - The article is currently ranked Stub-class, I expanded it a bit. Could it be reassessed? [[User:Isi96|Isi96]] ([[User talk:Isi96|talk]]) 04:16, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
* <s>[[Kevin M. Kruse]] - The article is currently ranked Stub-class, I expanded it a bit. Could it be reassessed? [[User:Isi96|Isi96]] ([[User talk:Isi96|talk]]) 04:16, 6 June 2021 (UTC)</s>
** Has been assessed as C-class since. <span style="font-family: serif; letter-spacing: 0.1em">–&nbsp;[[User:Finnusertop|Finnusertop]]</span> ([[User talk:Finnusertop|talk]] ⋅ [[Special:Contributions/Finnusertop|contribs]]) 15:29, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
* [[Talkata]] - An interesting Algerian tribe still unassessed could i ask for an assessment please. [[User:ⵟⵓⵔⴽⵉⵙⵀⴽⴰⴱⵢⵍ|ⵟⵓⵔⴽⵉⵙⵀⴽⴰⴱⵢⵍ]] ([[User talk:ⵟⵓⵔⴽⵉⵙⵀⴽⴰⴱⵢⵍ|talk]]) 18:35, 4 March 2024 (UTC)


==Popular pages==
==Popular pages==
Line 57: Line 60:
{{transcluded section|source= Wikipedia:WikiProject History/Quality}}
{{transcluded section|source= Wikipedia:WikiProject History/Quality}}
{{Wikipedia:WikiProject History/Quality}}
{{Wikipedia:WikiProject History/Quality}}
==Assessment data==
===Importance scale===
===Importance scale===
{| class = "wikitable" style = "float:left; margin-left:15px"
{| class = "wikitable" <!--style = "float:left; margin-left:15px"-->
|-
|-
|'''Need'''||The article's priority or importance, regardless of its quality
|'''Need'''||The article's priority or importance, regardless of its quality
Line 70: Line 74:
|{{Low-Class}}||Subject is mainly of specialist interest.
|{{Low-Class}}||Subject is mainly of specialist interest.
|}
|}
<p>
===Statistics===
{{transcluded section|Wikipedia:WikiProject History/Statistics}}

{{Wikipedia:WikiProject History/Statistics}}



<noinclude>
<noinclude>

===list of all subpages===
===list of all subpages===



Latest revision as of 18:35, 4 March 2024


Main pageDiscussion pageSub-pages indexArticle
Alerts
AssessmentReviewCollaborationTask ForcesOutreachMembersPopular pages


 Review Desk Review Coordination A-class review Article assessment 

Working Groups at WikiProject History:

Working Groups at WikiProject History:


About Us

The History Assessment Department, supported by WikiProject History, finds historical articles for the first time and rates them on quality and importance scales. A template is then placed on the article's talk page stating that the article is within the scope of WikiProject History and displaying what rating the article has been given.

Historical articles can be found in Category:History and its subcategories.

Participants

[edit]

Current active members:

Please feel free to add your name to join!!!!

Quality statistics

[edit]


Notes

[edit]

Please feel free to leave any notes at all in this section, regarding articles to be assessed, items to discuss, tasks to be done, or anything else.

please add your signature to any items that you add or any other text that you add on this page. that makes it much easier for active members of this project to help each other, to work on common projects and to assist each other. thanks. --Sm8900 (talk) 15:49, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tasks, items, notes, comments or questions

[edit]
[edit]

There is a list of list of popular pages, ordered by number of views, a bot-generated list of pageviews, useful for focused cleanup of frequently viewed articles.

Template

[edit]
WikiProject iconHistory Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Usage

[edit]

The following is the full syntax used for placing this template on a talk page:

{{WikiProject History
|class=
|importance=
|attention=
|auto=
|needs-infobox=
|Contemporary History=
|Contemporary history-importance=
}}

Parameters

[edit]
  • class – a rating of the article's quality; see the quality scale for more details.
  • importance – a rating of the article's quality; see the importance scale for more details.
  • attention – "yes" if the article is extremely low quality and requires the attention of experienced editors.
  • auto – used by bots if the article has been assessed automatically
  • needs-infobox – "yes" if the article requires an infobox
  • Contemporary History – "yes" if the Contemporary History task force applies
    • Contemporary history-importance – see "importance" parameter above

See also

[edit]

Quality scale

[edit]
[edit]

Reserved for articles that meet the featured article criteria and have received featured article status after community review

Featured articles are selected at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates

A-Class

[edit]

Reserved for articles that have received A-Class status after review by the project. Such articles are expected to largely meet the featured article criteria, and must be comprehensive, accurate, well-sourced, and decently-written.

A-Class articles are selected by the project at Wikipedia:WikiProject History/Review#A-Class Review.

Good articles

[edit]

Reserved for articles that meet the good article criteria and have received good article status.

Good articles are selected at Wikipedia:Good article nominations.

B-Class

[edit]

The article meets the following six criteria:

  1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited.
  2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies.
  3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content.
  4. It is free from major grammatical errors.
  5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams.
  6. It is written from a neutral point of view

Start Class

[edit]

Start class article have a few paragraphs that provide all the key points but may not cover all aspects of the subject. These articles usually have an image or infobox to support the text.

Start-class articles are selected by individual assessors.

Stub Class

[edit]

Stubs are very short articles which offer a quick description of the subject

Stub articles are selected by individual assessors


Assessment data

[edit]

Importance scale

[edit]
Need The article's priority or importance, regardless of its quality
Top Subject is a must-have for a good encyclopedia
High Subject contributes a depth of knowledge
Mid Subject fills in more minor details
Low Subject is mainly of specialist interest.

Statistics

[edit]
History article rating and assessment scheme
(NB: Listing, Log & Stats are updated on a daily basis by a bot)
Daily log of status changes
Current Statistics



list of all subpages

[edit]

In this wikipediaspace: