Constitutionality: Difference between revisions
Tag: Reverted |
m Undid revision 1261379536 by 142.190.62.131 (talk):Reverted vandalism |
||
(21 intermediate revisions by 16 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Status of law as permitted by the Constitution of the State}} |
{{Short description|Status of law as permitted by the Constitution of the State}} |
||
{{Multiple issues| |
|||
{{More citations needed|date=September 2014}} |
{{More citations needed|date=September 2014}} |
||
{{globalize|date=July 2020}} |
|||
}} |
|||
{{Use American English|date=January 2019}} |
{{Use American English|date=January 2019}} |
||
{{Use mdy dates|date=January 2019}} |
{{Use mdy dates|date=January 2019}} |
||
''' |
In [[constitutional law]], '''constitutionality''' is said to be the condition of acting in accordance with an applicable [[constitution]];<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/constitutionality |title=Definition of CONSTITUTIONALITY |access-date=2009-05-11 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090425031213/http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/constitutionality |archive-date=2009-04-25 }} "Webster On Line"</ref> the status of a law, a [[Procedural law|procedure]], or an act's accordance with the laws or set forth in the applicable constitution. When laws, procedures, or acts directly violate the constitution, they are '''unconstitutional'''. All others are considered constitutional unless the country in question has a mechanism for challenging laws as unconstitutional. |
||
== Applicability == |
== Applicability == |
||
An act or [[statute]] enacted as [[law]] either by a national [[legislature]] or by a subordinate-level legislature such as that of a [[state (administrative division)|state]] or [[province]] may be declared |
An act or [[statute]] enacted as [[law]] either by a national [[legislature]] or by a subordinate-level legislature such as that of a [[state (administrative division)|state]] or [[province]] may be declared unconstitutional. |
||
However, governments do not only create laws but also enforce the laws set forth in the document defining the government, which is the constitution. |
However, governments do not only create laws but also enforce the laws set forth in the document defining the government, which is the constitution. |
||
When the proper court determines that a legislative act or law conflicts with the constitution, it finds that law unconstitutional and declares it void in whole or in part. |
When the proper court determines that a legislative act or law conflicts with the constitution, it finds that law unconstitutional and declares it void in whole or in part. |
||
Depending on the type of legal system, a statute may be declared unconstitutional by any court or only by special [[constitution#constitutional courts|constitutional courts]] with authority to rule on the validity of a statute. |
Depending on the type of legal system, a statute may be declared unconstitutional by any court or only by special [[constitution#constitutional courts|constitutional courts]] with authority to rule on the validity of a statute. |
||
In some countries, the legislature may create any law for any purpose, and there is no provision for courts to declare a law unconstitutional. That can occur either because the country has |
In some countries, the legislature may create any law for any purpose, and there is no provision for courts to declare a law unconstitutional. That can occur either because the country has [[Uncodified constitution|no codified constitution]] that laws must conform to like in the [[United Kingdom]] and [[New Zealand]] or because the constitution is codified, but no court has the authority to strike down laws on the basis of it like in the [[Netherlands]] and [[Switzerland]]. |
||
In many jurisdictions, the [[supreme court]] or [[constitutional court]] is the final legal arbiter that renders an opinion on whether a law or an action of a government official is constitutional. |
In many jurisdictions, the [[supreme court]] or [[constitutional court]] is the final legal arbiter that renders an opinion on whether a law or an action of a government official is constitutional. Constitutions define the powers of government, Thus, national constitutions typically apply only to government actions. Only governments can then violate the nation's constitution, but there are exceptions. |
||
Most constitutions define the powers of government. Thus, national constitutions typically apply only to government actions. Only governments can then violate the nation's constitution, but there are exceptions. |
|||
A constitutional violation is thus somewhat different from the breaking of a normal [[law]] in terms of seriousness and punishment. Declaring a law unconstitutional does not usually result in the punishment of those who passed it. |
|||
The legal encyclopedia ''[[American Jurisprudence]]'' says the following in regard to constitutionality: |
|||
<blockquote>The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and the name of law, is in reality no law, but is wholly void and ineffective for any purpose since unconstitutionality dates from the time of its enactment and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it; an unconstitutional law, in legal contemplation, is as inoperative as if it had never been passed.... An unconstitutional law is void. (16 Am. Jur. 2d, Sec. 178)</blockquote> |
|||
A law in violation of an existing statute can be described as ''unstatutable''.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/unstatutable|title=Unstatutable {{!}} Definition, meaning & more {{!}} Collins Dictionary|website=[[CollinsDictionary.com]]|access-date=2016-08-23|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160921063607/http://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/unstatutable|archive-date=2016-09-21}}</ref> |
|||
== Examples of unconstitutional actions == |
== Examples of unconstitutional actions == |
||
<!--[[Unconstitutional]] and [[Unconstitutionality]] redirect here. If you rename or delete the section, please also update the redirects. --> |
<!--[[Unconstitutional]] and [[Unconstitutionality]] redirect here. If you rename or delete the section, please also update the redirects. --> |
||
A breach to the constitution could be minor or major. In the United Kingdom, much of the constitution is unwritten, which makes the term more ambiguous and cover an action that violates principles, procedures or rights. Thar makes it difficult to establish what is unconstitutional. |
|||
Unconstitutional actions include: |
|||
The case is clearer for the United States, which considers an act to be an infringement if it violates the spirit or the letter of the written constitution.<ref>{{Cite book|title=Understanding A/S Level Government Politics|last=Wilson|first=Christopher|publisher=Manchester University Press|year=2003|isbn=0719060818|location=Manchester|pages=177}}</ref> |
|||
Here are some examples of unconstitutional actions: |
|||
* Actions by politicians outside the powers of their constitutionally-established offices |
* Actions by politicians outside the powers of their constitutionally-established offices |
||
* Actions on behalf of the government that prevent an individual from exercising constitutionally-protected individual rights |
* Actions on behalf of the government that prevent an individual from exercising constitutionally-protected individual rights |
||
* The suspension of habeas corpus except in a state of emergency<ref>Wilson, p. 177.</ref> |
|||
==Unconstitutional laws in the United States== |
|||
Much debate often surrounds controversial laws enacted by [[state legislature (United States)|state legislatures]] and the [[US Congress]] regarding constitutionality. Some of those who strongly opposed particular acts in the 19th century proposed protecting the people by applying the [[Principles of '98]]. |
|||
However, [[judicial review in the United States|judicial review]] became the usual way to resolve US constitutional controversies. Few people there question that power's validity, and a leading legal expert stated that "it is as clear as such matters can be that the Framers of the Constitution specifically, if tacitly, expected that the federal courts would assume a power... to pass on the constitutionality of actions of the Congress and the President."<ref>{{Cite book|title=Constitutional Law National Power and Federalism: Examples and Explanations|last=May|first=Christopher|last2=Ides|first2=Allan|last3=Grossi|first3=Simona|publisher=Wolters Kluwer|year=2007|isbn=0735562113|location=Austin|pages=18}}</ref> |
|||
[[Judicial review]] also covers the evaluation of the constitutionality of the states' actions. It is even recognized that US federal judges are appointed for life to ensure their ability to engage in judicial review independently.<ref>May, Ides & Grossi, p. 18.</ref> |
|||
Influential examples of Supreme Court decisions that declared U.S. laws unconstitutional include ''[[Roe v. Wade]]'' (1973), which declared that prohibiting abortion is unconstitutional, and '' [[Brown v. Board of Education]]'' (1954), which found racial segregation in public schools to be unconstitutional.<ref>{{Cite book|title=Judicial Politics in the United States|last=Miller|first=Mark|publisher=Westview Press|year=2015|isbn=9780813346809|location=Philadelphia}}</ref> |
|||
There are different forms of constitutions.{{explain|date=July 2020}} The US Constitution is a "[[rigid constitution]]" and so can be modified only as their express terms allow and as the constitution itself ordains. |
|||
Lawmakers in the USA take an [[oath of office]] to uphold the Constitution. If an American lawmakers votes for or signs into law a bill that is later found to be unconstitutional, that lawmaker can be considered to have violated their oath of office, but there is little precedent for removing them from office for such offenses. The [[Founding Fathers of the United States]], the true patriots, had the intent to create a [[Living Constitution]] and attempts by modern lawmakers to enact unconstitutional laws can be considered a actions that are deliberately [[unpatriotic]] since such lawmakers are successful American politicians and thus intelligent and capable of recognizing the the bill is unconstitutional yet they cynically support it anyway. |
|||
==See also== |
==See also== |
||
Line 67: | Line 39: | ||
[[Category:Constitutional law]] |
[[Category:Constitutional law]] |
||
{{constitutional-law-stub}} |
Latest revision as of 22:39, 7 December 2024
This article needs additional citations for verification. (September 2014) |
In constitutional law, constitutionality is said to be the condition of acting in accordance with an applicable constitution;[1] the status of a law, a procedure, or an act's accordance with the laws or set forth in the applicable constitution. When laws, procedures, or acts directly violate the constitution, they are unconstitutional. All others are considered constitutional unless the country in question has a mechanism for challenging laws as unconstitutional.
Applicability
[edit]An act or statute enacted as law either by a national legislature or by a subordinate-level legislature such as that of a state or province may be declared unconstitutional.
However, governments do not only create laws but also enforce the laws set forth in the document defining the government, which is the constitution.
When the proper court determines that a legislative act or law conflicts with the constitution, it finds that law unconstitutional and declares it void in whole or in part.
Depending on the type of legal system, a statute may be declared unconstitutional by any court or only by special constitutional courts with authority to rule on the validity of a statute.
In some countries, the legislature may create any law for any purpose, and there is no provision for courts to declare a law unconstitutional. That can occur either because the country has no codified constitution that laws must conform to like in the United Kingdom and New Zealand or because the constitution is codified, but no court has the authority to strike down laws on the basis of it like in the Netherlands and Switzerland.
In many jurisdictions, the supreme court or constitutional court is the final legal arbiter that renders an opinion on whether a law or an action of a government official is constitutional. Constitutions define the powers of government, Thus, national constitutions typically apply only to government actions. Only governments can then violate the nation's constitution, but there are exceptions.
Examples of unconstitutional actions
[edit]Unconstitutional actions include:
- Actions by politicians outside the powers of their constitutionally-established offices
- Actions on behalf of the government that prevent an individual from exercising constitutionally-protected individual rights
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ "Definition of CONSTITUTIONALITY". Archived from the original on April 25, 2009. Retrieved May 11, 2009. "Webster On Line"