Homeopathy: Difference between revisions
Wikidudeman (talk | contribs) Implementing community rewrite of article. Please see talk page for further information. |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Pseudoscientific system of alternative medicine}} |
|||
[[Image:Rhustox.jpg|thumb|right|200px| Homeopathic remedy ''Rhus toxicodendron'', derived from [[poison ivy]].]] |
|||
{{for|the journal|Homeopathy (journal){{!}}''Homeopathy'' (journal)}} |
|||
{{pp-vandalism|small=yes}} |
|||
{{good article}} |
|||
{{Use Oxford spelling|date=September 2016}} |
|||
{{Use mdy dates|date=August 2017}} |
|||
{{Infobox alternative medicine |
|||
| name = Homeopathy |
|||
| synonyms = Homoeopathy |
|||
| pronounce = {{IPAc-en|audio=En-uk-homeopathy.ogg|ˌ|h|oʊ|m|i|ˈ|ɒ|p|ə|θ|i}} |
|||
| image = Saxonia Museum fuer saechsische Vaterlandskunde III 19.jpg |
|||
| image_size = 250 |
|||
| alt = Samuel Hahnemann |
|||
| caption = [[Samuel Hahnemann]], originator of homeopathy |
|||
| claims = "Like cures like", dilution increases potency, disease caused by [[#Miasms and disease|miasm]]s |
|||
| topics = [[Alternative medicine]] |
|||
| orig-date = 1796 |
|||
| origprop = [[Samuel Hahnemann]] |
|||
| laterprop = {{Plain list| |
|||
* [[James Tyler Kent]] |
|||
* [[Royal S. Copeland]] |
|||
* [[George Vithoulkas]] |
|||
}} |
|||
| seealso = [[Humorism]], [[heroic medicine]] |
|||
| MeshID = D006705 |
|||
}} |
|||
{{Alternative medical systems|fringe}} |
|||
'''Homeopathy''' or '''homoeopathy''' is a [[pseudoscientific]]<ref>{{multiref |
|||
'''Homeopathy''' (also homœopathy or homoeopathy; from the [[Greek]], ''όμοιος, hómoios'', "similar" + ''πάθος, páthos'', "suffering" or "disease") is a controversial form of [[alternative medicine]] that aims to treat "like with like". Homeopaths see the underlying causes of sickness as imbalances in a hypothetical [[vital force]] and believe that treatment of diseases with extremely diluted substances, which in larger quantities cause symptoms of the disease, can harmonize and re-balance the vital force in the body and so restore health.<ref name="homhist1"/> The process of producing remedies in homeopathy is known as "potentization" and involves serial dilutions of the drug, combined with vigorous shaking (called "succussion") and is accomplished in a series of stages; the number of stages varies according to the type of treatment. Homeopaths contend that remedies will retain some imprint (or [[water memory|memory]]) of the diluted substance despite the fact that at higher dilutions, no molecules of the original substance are likely to remain.<ref name=homsim>{{cite news | first= | last= | coauthors= | title= Similia similibus curentur (Like cures like) | date= | publisher= Creighton University Department of Pharmacology | url =http://altmed.creighton.edu/Homeopathy/philosophy/similia.htm | work = | pages = | accessdate = 2007-08-20 | language = }}</ref> |
|||
|1= |
|||
|2={{cite book |author=Tuomela, R |title=Rational Changes in Science |chapter=Science, Protoscience, and Pseudoscience |publisher=Springer |year=1987 |isbn=978-94-010-8181-8 |veditors=Pitt JC, Marcello P |series=Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science |volume=98 |pages=83–101 |doi=10.1007/978-94-009-3779-6_4 |author-link=Raimo Tuomela|issn = 0068-0346}} |
|||
<br /><br /> |
|||
|3={{cite journal |vauthors=Mukerji N, Ernst E |title=Why homoeopathy is pseudoscience |journal=Synthese |date=14 September 2022 |volume=200 |issue=5 |eissn=1573-0964 |doi=10.1007/s11229-022-03882-w |pmid=|s2cid=252297716 |url= |doi-access=free}} |
|||
<br /><br /> |
|||
|4={{cite book |vauthors=Baran GR, Kiana MF, Samuel SP |title=Healthcare and Biomedical Technology in the 21st Century |chapter=Science, Pseudoscience, and Not Science: How do They Differ? |publisher=Springer |year=2014 |pages=19–57 |doi=10.1007/978-1-4614-8541-4_2 |isbn=978-1-4614-8540-7 |quote=within the traditional medical community it is considered to be quackery }} |
|||
<br /><br /> |
|||
|5={{cite book |author=Ladyman J |veditors=Pigliucci M, Boudry M |year=2013 |pages=48–49 |publisher=University of Chicago Press |chapter=Chapter 3: Towards a Demarcation of Science from Pseudoscience |title=Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem |quote=Yet homeopathy is a paradigmatic example of pseudoscience. It is neither simply bad science nor science fraud, but rather profoundly departs from scientific method and theories while being described as scientific by some of its adherents (often sincerely). |isbn=978-0-226-05196-3}}}}</ref> system of [[alternative medicine]]. It was conceived in 1796 by the German physician [[Samuel Hahnemann]]. Its practitioners, called '''homeopaths''' or homeopathic physicians,<ref>{{Cite web |title=Homeopathic Physician Licensure |url=https://www.cga.ct.gov/2010/rpt/2010-R-0315.htm |access-date=2023-11-25 |website=OLR Research Report}}</ref> believe that a substance that causes symptoms of a disease in healthy people can cure similar symptoms in sick people; this doctrine is called ''[[similia similibus curentur]]'', or "like cures like".<ref name="Hahnemann" /> Homeopathic preparations are termed ''remedies'' and are made using [[homeopathic dilution]]. In this process, the selected substance is repeatedly diluted until the final product is chemically indistinguishable from the [[diluent]]. Often not even a single molecule of the original substance can be expected to remain in the product.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Homeopathy |url=https://www.rpharms.com/resources/quick-reference-guides/homeopathy |access-date=2019-11-17 |website=[[Royal Pharmaceutical Society]]}}</ref> Between each dilution homeopaths may hit and/or shake the product, claiming this makes the diluent "remember" the original substance after its removal. Practitioners claim that such preparations, upon oral intake, can treat or cure disease.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2017-10-18 |title=Homeopathy |url=https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/homeopathy/ |access-date=2019-11-10 |website=nhs.uk |language=en}}</ref> |
|||
All relevant scientific knowledge about physics, chemistry, biochemistry and biology contradicts homeopathy.<ref>{{multiref |
|||
Homeopathy traces its origins to the late 18th century when it was founded by [[German]] [[physician]] [[Samuel Hahnemann]]. The term "homeopathy" was coined by Hahnemann and first appeared in print in 1807.<ref name="Hahnemannprint"/> During the 19th century homeopathy had a substantial impact upon medicine and in 1830 the first homeopathic schools opened and throughout the 19th century dozens of homeopathic institutions appeared in Europe and the United States.<ref name="Julian"/> Hahnemann developed homeopathy after noticing the effects of [[Cinchona]] bark on himself. Cinchona bark contains [[quinine]] and is often used as a treatment for [[malaria]], however Hahnemann noticed that if ingested by healthy individuals, cinchona bark would produce some symptoms of malaria. From this experience Hahnemann deduced that an effective drug must produce the symptoms in healthy individuals that are similar to the symptoms of the sick patient which they are supposed to be treating. This idea would later become known as the "law of similars" otherwise known as "like cures like".<ref name="homhist1"/> Based on later experiments, Hahnemann reasoned that using natural doses of substances would generally not help patients because if they produced effects similar to those of the disease, they would only make symptoms worse. Thus he proposed the [[dilution|dilution]] of substances in [[water]] or [[alcohol]] in order to eliminate such bad effects of a drug while hoping to retain its therapeutic value. Homeopathy contends that the vital force in the body has the ability to react or adapt to disturbances, which in homeopathy is referred to as the "law of susceptibility". This law states that various causes can attract hypothetical disease-causing entities called "miasms", which upon invading the body produce symptoms of disease. Hahnemann devised the miasm hypothesis as a deeper cause of sickness, to account for his observation that homeopathic remedies were sometimes failing to produce lasting cures of some long-standing chronic diseases. The main miasm in homeopathy is called the "psora" ([[Greek]]: itch), and is thought to be the cause of most diseases including [[epilepsy]], [[cancer]], [[deafness]], and [[cataracts]].<ref name="Ramey"/> |
|||
|1= |
|||
|2={{cite journal |last1=Shang |first1=Aijing |last2=Huwiler-Müntener |first2=Karin |last3=Nartey |first3=Linda |last4=Jüni |first4=Peter |last5=Dörig |first5=Stephan |last6=Sterne |first6=Jonathan AC |last7=Pewsner |first7=Daniel |last8=Egger |first8=Matthias |title=Are the clinical effects of homoeopathy placebo effects? Comparative study of placebo-controlled trials of homoeopathy and allopathy |journal=The Lancet |volume=366 |pages=726–32 |year=2005 |doi=10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67177-2 |pmid=16125589 |issue=9487|s2cid=17939264 }} |
|||
<br /><br /> |
|||
|3={{cite journal|last=Ernst|first=E.|date=December 2012|title=Homeopathy: a critique of current clinical research|url=http://www.csicop.org/si/show/homeopathy_a_critique_of_current_clinical_research|journal=[[Skeptical Inquirer]]|volume=36|issue=6}} |
|||
<br /><br /> |
|||
|4={{cite web|title=Homeopathy|url=http://www.cancer.org/treatment/treatmentsandsideeffects/complementaryandalternativemedicine/pharmacologicalandbiologicaltreatment/homeopathy|access-date=October 12, 2014|publisher=American Cancer Society|archive-date=March 16, 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130316003948/http://www.cancer.org/treatment/treatmentsandsideeffects/complementaryandalternativemedicine/pharmacologicalandbiologicaltreatment/homeopathy}} |
|||
<br /><br /> |
|||
|5=UK Parliamentary Committee Science and Technology Committee. [http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/science-and-technology-committee/inquiries/homeopathy-/ "Evidence Check 2: Homeopathy"] |
|||
<br /><br /> |
|||
|6={{cite journal|last1=Grimes|first1=D.R.|year=2012|title=Proposed mechanisms for homeopathy are physically impossible|journal=Focus on Alternative and Complementary Therapies|volume=17|issue=3|pages=149–55|doi=10.1111/j.2042-7166.2012.01162.x}} |
|||
<br /><br /> |
|||
|7={{cite web|date=September 2017|title=Homeopathic products and practices: assessing the evidence and ensuring consistency in regulating medical claims in the EU|url=http://www.easac.eu/fileadmin/PDF_s/reports_statements/EASAC_Homepathy_statement_web_final.pdf|access-date=1 October 2017|work=European Academies' Science Advisory Council|page=1|quote=... we agree with previous extensive evaluations concluding that there are no known diseases for which there is robust, reproducible evidence that homeopathy is effective beyond the placebo effect.}} |
|||
<br /><br /> |
|||
|8={{cite book |
|||
|author=Oliver Wendell Holmes Sr. |
|||
|title=Homoeopathy and its kindred delusions: Two lectures delivered before the Boston Society for the Diffusion of Useful Knowledge |
|||
|url=https://archive.org/details/64340260R.nlm.nih.gov |
|||
|location=Boston |
|||
|year=1842 |
|||
|author-link=Oliver Wendell Holmes Sr |
|||
}} as reprinted in |
|||
{{cite book |
|||
|author=Oliver Wendell Holmes Sr. |
|||
|title=Currents and counter-currents in medical science |
|||
|year=1861 |
|||
|publisher=Ticknor and Fields |
|||
|pages=72–188 |
|||
|url=https://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/011611362 |
|||
|oclc=1544161 |
|||
|ol=14731800M |
|||
|author-link=Oliver Wendell Holmes Sr |
|||
}} |
|||
}}</ref> Homeopathic remedies are typically [[Biochemistry|biochemically]] inert, and have no effect on any known disease.<ref name="shang" /><ref name="pmid124926032">{{cite journal|last1=Ernst|first1=E.|author-link=Edzard Ernst|year=2002|title=A systematic review of systematic reviews of homeopathy|journal=British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology|volume=54|issue=6|pages=577–82|doi=10.1046/j.1365-2125.2002.01699.x|pmc=1874503|pmid=12492603}}</ref><ref name="inquiry_4504">{{cite web|date=February 22, 2010|title=Evidence Check 2: Homeopathy – Science and Technology Committee|url=https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200910/cmselect/cmsctech/45/4504.htm|access-date=April 5, 2014|publisher=[[House of Commons of the United Kingdom|British House of Commons]] Science and Technology Committee}}</ref> Its theory of disease, centered around principles Hahnemann termed [[#Miasms and disease|miasms]], is inconsistent with subsequent identification of viruses and bacteria as [[germ theory of disease|causes of disease]]. Clinical trials have been conducted and generally demonstrated no objective effect from homeopathic preparations.<ref name="Caulfield20053">{{cite journal|last1=Caulfield|first1=Timothy|author-link=Timothy Caulfield|last2=Debow|first2=Suzanne|year=2005|title=A systematic review of how homeopathy is represented in conventional and CAM peer reviewed journals|journal=BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine|volume=5|page=12|doi=10.1186/1472-6882-5-12|pmc=1177924|pmid=15955254 |doi-access=free }}</ref><ref name="sbm-fun">{{Cite news|last=Gorski|first=David|authorlink= David Gorski|date=October 13, 2008|title=Fun with homeopaths and meta-analyses of homeopathy trials|language=en-US|website=Science-Based Medicine|url=https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/fun-with-homeopaths-and-meta-analyses-of-homeopathy-trials/|access-date=2019-11-09}}</ref><ref name="Shelton" />{{rp|206|date=November 2012}}<ref name="Ernst20102">{{cite journal|last1=Ernst|first1=E.|author-link1=Edzard Ernst|year=2010|title=Homeopathy: What does the "best" evidence tell us?|url=https://www.mja.com.au/journal/2010/192/8/homeopathy-what-does-best-evidence-tell-us|journal=Medical Journal of Australia|volume=192|issue=8|pages=458–60|doi=10.5694/j.1326-5377.2010.tb03585.x|pmid=20402610|s2cid=42180344}}</ref> The fundamental [[Evidence and efficacy of homeopathy|implausibility of homeopathy as well as a lack of demonstrable effectiveness]] has led to it being characterized within the scientific and medical communities as [[quackery]] and [[fraud]].<ref name="Baran2014">{{cite book |vauthors=Baran GR, Kiana MF, Samuel SP |title=Healthcare and Biomedical Technology in the 21st Century |chapter=Science, Pseudoscience, and Not Science: How do They Differ? |publisher=Springer |year=2014 |pages=19–57 |doi=10.1007/978-1-4614-8541-4_2 |isbn=978-1-4614-8540-7 |quote=within the traditional medical community it is considered to be quackery }}</ref><ref name="Walport-Nonsense">{{cite news|last1=Collins|first1=Nick|date=April 18, 2013|title=Homeopathy is nonsense, says new chief scientist|work=[[The Daily Telegraph]]|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/10003680/Homeopathy-is-nonsense-says-new-chief-scientist.html|access-date=September 9, 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130420234704/http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/10003680/Homeopathy-is-nonsense-says-new-chief-scientist.html|archive-date=April 20, 2013}}</ref><ref name="oxcompus">{{cite book|author=Paul S. Boyer|url=https://archive.org/details/oxfordcompaniont00paul_0|title=The Oxford companion to United States history|year=2001|isbn=978-0-19-508209-8|page=[https://archive.org/details/oxfordcompaniont00paul_0/page/630 630]|publisher=Oxford University Press |quote=After 1847, when regular doctors organized the American Medical Association (AMA), that body led the war on "quackery", especially targeting dissenting medical groups such as homeopaths, who prescribed infinitesimally small doses of medicine. Ironically, even as the AMA attacked all homeopathy as quackery, educated homeopathic physicians were expelling untrained quacks from their ranks.|access-date=January 15, 2013|url-access=registration}}</ref> |
|||
Homeopathy achieved its greatest popularity in the 19th century. It was introduced to the United States in 1825, and the first American homeopathic school opened in 1835. Throughout the 19th century, dozens of homeopathic institutions appeared in Europe and the United States. During this period, homeopathy was able to appear relatively successful, as other forms of treatment could be harmful and ineffective. By the end of the century the practice began to wane, with the last exclusively homeopathic medical school in the United States closing in 1920. During the 1970s, homeopathy made a significant comeback, with sales of some homeopathic products increasing tenfold. The trend corresponded with the rise of the [[New Age movement]], and may be in part due to [[chemophobia]], an irrational aversion to synthetic chemicals, and the longer consultation times homeopathic practitioners provided. |
|||
Today there are estimated to be over 100,000 homeopathic physicians practicing homeopathy worldwide and an estimated 500 million people receiving homeopathic treatments.<ref name="numbers"/> Over 12,000 [[medical doctor]]s and health care practitioners administer homeopathic treatments in the [[UK|United Kingdom]], [[France]], [[Denmark]] and [[Germany]]. An estimated 32% of French patients, 28% of Danish patients and 16% of UK patients have used homeopathic treatments at least once. In the United States homeopathy is less popular with an estimated 1.7% of patients having reported use of homeopathic treatments.<ref name="Ward"/> While Homeopathy is considered to have helped pave the way for modern medical practices, the medical efficacy of it's treatments are frequently disputed by experimental studies. More recent and controlled clinical trials of homeopathy have shown mixed results and systematic reviews have found numerous flaws and possibilities of bias in experiments showing positive results. |
|||
In the 21st century, a series of [[Meta-analysis|meta-analyses]] have shown that the therapeutic claims of homeopathy lack scientific justification. As a result, national and international bodies have recommended the withdrawal of government funding for homeopathy in healthcare. National bodies from Australia, the United Kingdom, Switzerland and France, as well as the [[European Academies' Science Advisory Council]] and the [[Russian Academy of Sciences]] have all concluded that homeopathy is ineffective, and recommended against the practice receiving any further funding.<ref name="Conversation-NHMRC">{{cite news |url=http://theconversation.com/no-evidence-homeopathy-is-effective-nhmrc-review-25368 |title=No evidence homeopathy is effective: NHMRC review |work=The Conversation |date=April 8, 2014 |last=Musgrave|first=I |access-date=January 10, 2015 }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=Swiss make New Year's regulations |date=January 2012 |url=http://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/swiss-make-new-year-s-regulations/31867422 |publisher=Swiss Info |access-date=December 16, 2015}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=Homeopathic remedies are 'nonsense and risk significant harm' say 29 European scientific bodies|url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/homeopathy-nonsense-risk-harm-29-european-academies-science-advisory-council-remedies-a7963786.html|access-date=October 10, 2017|newspaper=The Independent|date=September 23, 2017}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|date=2017-02-07|title=Memorandum #2. Homeopathy as pseudoscience|url=http://klnran.ru/en/2017/02/memorandum02-homeopathy/|access-date=June 25, 2019|website=[[Commission on Pseudoscience]]}}</ref> The [[NHS England|National Health Service in England]] no longer provides funding for homeopathic remedies and asked the [[Department of Health and Social Care|Department of Health]] to add homeopathic remedies to the list of forbidden prescription items.<ref>{{cite news|date=July 21, 2017|title=NHS to ban homeopathy and herbal medicine, as 'misuse of resources'|newspaper=Daily Telegraph|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/07/21/nhs-ban-homeopathy-herbal-medicine-misuse-resources/ |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220111/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/07/21/nhs-ban-homeopathy-herbal-medicine-misuse-resources/ |archive-date=January 11, 2022 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live|access-date=July 21, 2017}}{{cbignore}}</ref><ref name="TNHS">{{cite news|last1=Donnelly|first1=Laura|date=5 June 2018|title=High Court backs NHS decision to stop funding homeopathy|newspaper=Daily Telegraph|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/2018/06/05/high-court-backs-nhs-decision-stop-funding-homeopathy/ |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220111/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/2018/06/05/high-court-backs-nhs-decision-stop-funding-homeopathy/ |archive-date=January 11, 2022 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live|access-date=26 August 2018}}{{cbignore}}</ref><ref name="bbc-blacklist">{{Cite news |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-34744858 |title=Homeopathy 'could be blacklisted' |last=Gallagher |first=James |date=2015-11-13 |work=BBC News |access-date=2017-12-05 |language=en-GB}}</ref> France removed funding in 2021,<ref name="GuardianFrance">{{Cite news |url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/jul/10/france-to-stop-reimbursing-patients-for-homeopathic-treatment |title=France to stop reimbursing patients for homeopathy |agency=Agence France-Presse |date=2019-07-10 |work=The Guardian |access-date=2019-07-30 |language=en-GB |issn=0261-3077}}</ref><ref name="FranceEndFunding2021">{{cite web |url=https://www.francetvinfo.fr/sante/medicament/homeopathie/homeopathie-2021-signe-la-fin-du-remboursement_4240961.html |title=Homéopathie: 2021 signe la fin du remboursement |publisher=France Info | date=January 2021 | access-date=18 November 2023 }}</ref> while Spain has also announced moves to ban homeopathy and other pseudotherapies from health centers.<ref name="El Pais 2019-07-30">{{Cite news |url=https://elpais.com/elpais/2018/11/14/inenglish/1542203925_514487.html |title=Spain moves to ban pseudo-therapies from universities and health centers |last=Güell |first=Oriol |date=2018-11-14 |work=El País |access-date=2019-07-30 |language=en |issn=1134-6582}}</ref> |
|||
While the methods of homeopathy including it's focus on patients and emphasis on clinical trials was ahead of it's time when it was conceived, it has received a significant amount of criticism on scientific and medical grounds and is considered by many scientists to be ineffective.<ref name="nhspseudo"/><ref name="amapseudo"/> The hypothesis that extreme dilution makes any [[pharmaceutical]] more powerful is inconsistent with the principles of [[chemistry]] and [[physics]] as well as the observed [[Dose-response relationship|dose-response relationships]] of conventional drugs. The scientific community asserts there is no convincing scientific evidence supporting the contention that water retains any memory of a substance. Researchers conclude that any positive effects that arise after homeopathic treatment are simply a [[placebo effect]].<ref name=pmid16125589/> Homeopaths are also often accused of giving 'false hope' to patients who might be better advised to seek effective conventional treatments and studies have shown homeopaths frequently advise patients to not seek standard medical procedures including drugs which can prevent diseases such as malaria.<ref name=pmid9243229/><ref name=pmid8554846/> Most meta-analysis done on homeopathy have concluded that its effects are unlikely to be beyond that of placebo, and those studies that have shown positive results for Homeopathic treatments were flawed in design.<ref name=pmid11316508/><ref name=pmid8255290/><ref name=pmid1376282/> |
|||
==History== |
==History== |
||
Homeopathy was created in 1796 by [[Samuel Hahnemann]].<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Loudon|first=Irvine|date=December 2006|title=A brief history of homeopathy|journal=Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine|volume=99|issue=12|pages=607–610|doi=10.1177/014107680609901206|issn=0141-0768|pmc=1676328|pmid=17139061}}</ref> Hahnemann rejected the mainstream medicine of the late 18th century as irrational and inadvisable, because it was largely ineffective and often harmful.<ref name="Lasagna"> |
|||
Modern homeopathy was created by [[German]] [[Physician]] [[Samuel Hahnemann]] during the late 18th and early 19th century. The system of similars emphasized in homeopathy was first described by doctors of the ''[[vitalist]]'' school of medicine and one of the most prominent proponents of vitalism was the [[Renaissance]] physician [[Paracelsus]]. Paracelsus subscribed to many of the same principles as the modern founder of [[homeopathy]], Samuel Hahnemann. [[Vienna]] physician [[:de:Anton von Störck|Anton Freiherr von Störck]] and [[Scotland|Scottish]] [[physician]] [[John Brown (doctor)|John Brown]] also held similar medical beliefs to Samuel Hahnemann prior to the conception of homeopathy |
|||
{{cite book |
|||
|author =Lasagna L |
|||
|title =The doctors' dilemmas |
|||
|location =New York |
|||
|publisher =Collier Books |
|||
|year =1970 |
|||
|orig-date =1962 |
|||
|page =33 |
|||
|isbn =978-0-8369-1669-0 |
|||
}}</ref><ref name="isbn0-393-06661-4">{{cite book |author1=Edzard Ernst |author-link1=Edzard Ernst|author2=Singh, Simon |author-link2=Simon Singh|title=Trick or Treatment: The Undeniable Facts about Alternative Medicine |publisher=W. W. Norton |location=New York |year=2008 |isbn=978-0-393-06661-6 |title-link=Trick or Treatment: The Undeniable Facts about Alternative Medicine }}</ref> He advocated the use of single drugs at lower doses and promoted an immaterial, [[vitalism|vitalistic]] view of how living organisms function.<ref name="Pray2003">{{cite book|author=W. Steven Pray|title=a History of Nonprescription Product Regulation|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=uadgq04eLr0C&pg=PA192|access-date=January 21, 2013|date=August 1, 2003|publisher=Psychology Press|isbn=978-0-7890-1538-9|page=192}}</ref> The term ''homeopathy'' was coined by Hahnemann and first appeared in print in 1807.<ref> |
|||
{{cite journal|author=Dean ME|year=2001|title=Homeopathy and "the progress of science"|url=http://www.shpltd.co.uk/dean-homeopathy.pdf|journal=Hist Sci|volume=39|issue=125 Pt 3|pages=255–83|bibcode=2001HisSc..39..255E|doi=10.1177/007327530103900301|pmid=11712570|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060101084902/http://www.shpltd.co.uk/dean-homeopathy.pdf|archive-date=January 1, 2006|access-date=March 31, 2009|s2cid=23943688}} |
|||
</ref> He also coined the expression "[[allopathic medicine]]", which was used to pejoratively refer to traditional Western medicine.<ref name="Whorton2004">{{cite book|author=Whorton JC|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=RU0DndWVSPoC&pg=PA18|title=Nature Cures: The History of Alternative Medicine in America|publisher=[[Oxford University Press US]]|year=2004|isbn=978-0-19-517162-4|location=New York|pages=18, 52}}</ref> |
|||
=== |
===Concept=== |
||
[[File:Samuel Hahnemann Monument, Scott Circle.jpg|thumb|[[Samuel Hahnemann Monument]], Washington, D.C., with the inscription ''Similia Similibus Curentur'' – "Like cures Like"]] |
|||
[[Image:Beydeman Gomeopatiya vzir.jpg|thumb|210px|left|1857 painting by Alexander Beydeman showing historical figures and personifications of homeopathy observing the perceived brutality of medicine of the [[19th century]].]] |
|||
Hahnemann conceived of homeopathy while translating a medical treatise by the Scottish physician and chemist [[William Cullen]] into German. Being sceptical of Cullen's theory that [[cinchona]] cured [[malaria]] because it was bitter, Hahnemann ingested some bark specifically to investigate what would happen. He experienced fever, shivering and [[arthralgia|joint pain]]: symptoms similar to those of malaria itself. From this, Hahnemann came to believe that all effective drugs produce symptoms in healthy individuals similar to those of the diseases that they treat.<ref name="UllmanReichenberg-Ullman1994">{{cite book|author1=Robert W. Ullman|author2=Judyth Reichenberg-Ullman|title=The patient's guide to homeopathic medicine |url=https://archive.org/details/patientsguidetoh00robe |url-access=registration|access-date=January 24, 2013|date=October 1, 1994|publisher=Picnic Point Press|isbn=978-0-9640654-2-0|pages=[https://archive.org/details/patientsguidetoh00robe/page/1 1]–2}}</ref> This led to the name ''"homeopathy"'', which comes from the {{lang-grc-gre|ὅμοιος}} ''hómoios'', "-like" and {{lang|el|πάθος}} ''páthos'', "suffering".<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Merrell|first1=Woodson C.|last2=Shalts|first2=Edward|date=2002|title=Homeopathy|journal=The Medical Clinics of North America|volume=86|issue=1|pages=47–62|doi=10.1016/s0025-7125(03)00071-3|issn=0025-7125|pmid=11795090}}</ref> |
|||
In Hahnemann's day, mainstream medicine was a degenerate form of [[Galenic|Galenism]], with a theory of disease based upon the ancient [[Greek]] idea of four [[humours]]. Medicine of the time professed to restore the balance of the humours, mostly by employing such measures as [[bloodletting]] and purging, use of [[laxative]]s, [[enema]]s and substances that induced vomiting, as well as suppressing symptoms using complex mixtures of plant and mineral drugs in strong doses. Such measures often made symptoms worse or proved fatal. By contrast, Hahnemann rebelled against these methods, and the use of mixed drugs in strong doses, favoring the use of single drugs in milder doses. He later came to promote an immaterial, [[vitalism|vitalistic]] view of how living organisms function and thought that diseases have [[spiritual]], as well as physical causes.<ref>{{cite book |
|||
| last = HAHNEMANN |
|||
| first = Dr Samuel |
|||
| authorlink = Samuel Hahnemann |
|||
| coauthors = |
|||
| title = Organon of medicine |
|||
| publisher = |
|||
| date = 1818 |
|||
| location = Leipzig |
|||
| pages = |
|||
| url = http://homeoint.org/books/hahorgan/orgapref.htm |
|||
| doi = |
|||
| id = |
|||
| isbn = }}</ref><ref> {{cite web|url=http://www.minutus.org/library/article_read.asp?id=13 |title= Appeal to Thinking Philanthropist Respecting the Mode of Propagation of the Asiatic Choler |accessdate=2007-08-13 |last=Hahnemann |first=Samuel |date=1831 }}</ref> During the [[18th century]] [[vitalism]] was part of mainstream science. However, in the twentieth century, medicine discarded vitalism in favor of the [[germ theory]] of disease, following the work of [[Robert Koch]], [[Louis Pasteur]], [[Alexander Fleming]], [[Joseph Lister]] and many others. |
|||
The doctrine that those drugs are effective which produce symptoms similar to the symptoms caused by the diseases they treat, called "the law of similars", was expressed by Hahnemann with the Latin phrase ''[[similia similibus curentur]]'', or "like cures like".<ref name="Hahnemann" /> Hahnemann's law of similars is unproven and does not derive from the [[scientific method]].<ref name="Kirk">{{cite journal|date=December 1894|editor2=John Hugh McQuillen|editor3=George Jacob Ziegler|editor4=James William White|editor5=Edward Cameron Kirk|editor6=Lovick Pierce Anthony|title=A wail from the waste-basket|url=http://quod.lib.umich.edu/d/dencos/acf8385.0036.001/1050:349?didno=ACF8385.0036.001;rgn=full+text;view=image|journal=[[The Dental Cosmos]]|type=editorial|volume=36|issue=12|pages=1030–32|editor=J. D. White}}</ref> An account of the effects of eating cinchona bark noted by [[Oliver Wendell Holmes Sr.|Oliver Wendell Holmes]], published in 1861, failed to reproduce the symptoms Hahnemann reported.<ref name="Holmes" />{{rp|128}} Subsequent scientific work showed that cinchona cures malaria because it contains [[quinine]], which kills the ''[[Plasmodium falciparum]]'' parasite that causes the disease; the mechanism of action is unrelated to Hahnemann's ideas.<ref name="Atwood-BTTF1">{{cite web |url=http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/homeopathy-and-evidence-based-medicine-back-to-the-future-part-i/ |title=Homeopathy and evidence-based medicine: back to the future |publisher=[[Science Based Medicine]] |date=January 4, 2008 |access-date=September 9, 2013 |last=Atwood |first=Kimball}}</ref> |
|||
===Modern theory of homeopathy=== |
|||
[[Image:Samuel_Hahnemann.png|thumb|right|'''Samuel Hahnemann''', considered to be the father of homeopathy]] |
|||
Samuel Hahnemann conceived of [[homeopathy]] while translating a [[Materia Medica]], a treatise by [[Scotland|Scottish]] [[physician]] and [[chemist]] [[William Cullen]], into [[German language|German]]. On reading about [[Cinchona]] bark, from which [[quinine]] is extracted and is used to treat malaria, he noticed that Cullen described the mechanism of the substance as having "stomach strengthening properties". Hahnemann was skeptical of this explanation and decided to understand the effects of Cinchona bark by taking it himself. Upon ingesting Cinchona bark, he noticed that he experienced [[fever]], [[shivering]] and [[arthralgia]] (joint pain). These symptoms are similar to some of those of [[malaria]], which the substance was supposed to be treating. From this experience he deduced that all effective drugs must produce the symptoms in healthy individuals that are similar to the diseases which they are supposed to be treating. This later became known as the "Law of similars" and the most important concept of homeopathy.<ref name=homhist1>{{cite news | first= | last= | coauthors= | title=History of Homeopathy | date= | publisher= Creighton University Department of Pharmacology | url =http://altmed.creighton.edu/Homeopathy/history.htm | work = | pages = | accessdate = 2007-07-23 | language = }}</ref> This experiment was by no means unique, as others before him had tried the same approach including [[:de:Anton von Störck|Anton Freiherr von Störck]] who in the 1760's advocated treatment by cautious use of poisons."<ref>[http://5ichc-portugal.ulusofona.pt/uploads/LongPaper-LICHOCKAHalina.doc Halina Zofia Lichocka "Chemical Analysis as a Method of Discovery in Pharmacy in the Age of Enlightenment in Europe" Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on the history of Chemistry]</ref> The term "homeopathy" was coined by Hahnemann and first appeared in print in [[1807]],<ref name= Hahnemannprint>Hahnemann, S. Fingerzeige auf den homöopathischen Gebrauch der Arzneien in der bisherigen Praxis. [Hufeland's] N. J. d. pract. Arzkd. (1807) 26:5-43</ref> although he began outlining his theories of 'medical similars' in a series of articles and monographs in [[1796]].<ref>Hahnemann, S. Versuch über ein neues Prinzip zur Auffindung der Heilkräfte der Arzneisubstanzen, nebst einigen Blicken auf die bisherigen. [Hufeland's] J. d. pract. Arzkd. (1796) 2(3):391-439 and 2(4):465-561. This article can be read in English translation on the [http://www.minutus.org/index.asp Minutus] website, where it appears as [http://www.minutus.org/library/article_read.asp?id=6 ''Essay On A New Principle For Ascertaining The Curative Powers Of Drugs - Birth of Homeopat''], [[Christian Friedrich Samuel Hahnemann]], 1796.</ref> |
|||
====Provings==== |
|||
Hahnemann began to conduct extensive experiments to determine which symptoms were produced by various substances. This process would later become known as "proving". The tests were time consuming and required subjects to clearly record all of their symptoms as well as the time of their appearance and the results suggested to Hahnemann which drugs would be useful for treatments. The first collection of provings of 27 drugs was published in 1805 and a second collection of 65 remedies appeared in the Materia Medica Pura of 1810. Having surmised that large doses of the substances would be unsuitable, Hahnemann advocated extreme dilutions of the substances by ten or one hundred fold. He gathered and published a complete overview of his new medical system in his 1810 book: [[The Organon of the Healing Art|The organon of the healing art]], who's 6th edition published in 1921 is still used by homeopaths today.<ref name="homhist1"/> |
|||
Hahnemann began to test what effects various substances may produce in humans, a procedure later called "homeopathic proving". These tests required subjects to test the effects of ingesting substances by recording all their symptoms as well as the ancillary conditions under which they appeared.<ref name="Haehl1922">{{cite book|author=Richard Haehl|title=Samuel Hahnemann: His Life and Work: Based on Recently Discovered State Papers, Documents, Letters, Etc|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Q80gR6OxDVsC&pg=PA101|access-date=January 24, 2013|year=1922|publisher=B. Jain Publishers|isbn=978-81-7021-693-3|page=101}}</ref> He published a collection of provings in 1805, and a second collection of 65 preparations appeared in his book, ''Materia Medica Pura'' (1810).<ref name="Kirschmann2004">{{cite book|author=Anne Taylor Kirschmann|title=A vital force: women in American homeopathy |url=https://archive.org/details/vitalforcewomeni0000kirs|url-access=registration|access-date=January 28, 2013|year=2004|publisher=Rutgers University Press|isbn=978-0-8135-3320-9|page=[https://archive.org/details/vitalforcewomeni0000kirs/page/11 11]}}</ref> |
|||
As Hahnemann believed that large doses of drugs that caused similar symptoms would only aggravate illness, he advocated for extreme dilutions. A technique was devised for making dilutions that Hahnemann claimed would preserve the substance's therapeutic properties while removing its harmful effects.<ref name="Dynamization and Dilution">{{cite web |title=Dynamization and dilution |work=Complementary and Alternative Medicine |publisher=[[Creighton University]] Department of Pharmacology |url=http://altmed.creighton.edu/Homeopathy/philosophy/dilution.htm |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20020826082134/http://altmed.creighton.edu/Homeopathy/philosophy/dilution.htm |archive-date=August 26, 2002 |access-date=March 24, 2009}}</ref> Hahnemann believed that this process enhanced "the spirit-like medicinal powers of the crude substances".<ref name="Organon_5th_269">{{cite book |author=Hahnemann S |title=The organon of the healing art |year=1833 |publisher=Keats Pub. |edition=5th |at=aphorism 269 |isbn=978-0-87983-228-5}}. |
|||
During the 19th century homeopathy had a substantial impact upon medicine and in 1830 the first homeopathic schools opened and throughout the 19th century dozens of homeopathic institutions appeared in Europe and the United States.<ref name=Julian> {{cite web|url=http://www.wholehealthnow.com/homeopathy_pro/homeopathy_1825_1849.html |title=Homeopathy Timeline |accessdate=2007-07-23 |last=Winston |first=Julian |date=2006 |work="The Faces of Homoeopathy" |publisher=Whole Health Now }}</ref> Homeopathic hospitals also appeared and practitioners of homeopathy often had better outcomes compared to those of their counterparts in mainstream medicine. This was likely due to the fact homeopathic treatments were rarely dangerous compared to those of the mainstream which often included blood letting or treatments with poisonous or noxious compounds. In homeopathy patients were less likely to be killed by the medical procedure which was supposed to be helping them.<ref name="homhist1"/> |
|||
{{cite book |author=Hahnemann S |title=The organon of the healing art |publication-date=1921 |year=1842 |publisher=Keats Pub. |edition=6th |at=aphorism 270 |isbn=978-0-87983-228-5}}</ref> He gathered and published an overview of his new medical system in his book, ''[[The Organon of the Healing Art]]'' (1810), with a sixth edition published in 1921 that homeopaths still use today.<ref name="homhist1"> |
|||
{{cite web |title=History of Homeopathy |publisher=Creighton University Department of Pharmacology |url=http://altmed.creighton.edu/Homeopathy/history.htm |access-date=July 23, 2007 |date=July 2007 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070705095116/http://altmed.creighton.edu/Homeopathy/history.htm |archive-date=July 5, 2007}}</ref> |
|||
====Miasms and disease==== |
|||
The last homeopathic school which taught exclusively homeopathy was closed down in the U.S. in 1920, though the Hahnemann School of Medicine, now part of [[Drexel University]], continued to offer homeopathy electives until the 1940's.<ref name="homhist1"/> |
|||
In the ''Organon'', Hahnemann introduced the concept of "miasms" as the "infectious principles" underlying chronic disease<ref name="ClarkeClarke2001">{{cite book |author=John Henry Clarke |title=Homeopathy explained |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ZUGIWuo4qc8C&pg=PA22 |access-date=January 12, 2013 |date=January 1, 2001 |publisher=Nanopathy |pages=22–|id=GGKEY:JWCD56EF80T }}</ref> and as "peculiar morbid derangement[s] of vital force".<ref name="Grimes2012">{{cite journal |
|||
|author=Grimes, D. R. |
|||
|title=Proposed mechanisms for homeopathy are physically impossible |
|||
|journal=[[Focus on Alternative and Complementary Therapies]] |
|||
|date=2012 |
|||
|volume=17 |
|||
|issue=3 |
|||
|page=154|doi=10.1111/j.2042-7166.2012.01162.x |
|||
}}</ref> Hahnemann associated each miasm with specific diseases, and thought that initial exposure to miasms causes local symptoms, such as skin or venereal diseases. His assertion was that if these symptoms were suppressed by medication, the cause went deeper and began to manifest itself as diseases of the internal organs.<ref name="miasms" /> Homeopathy maintains that treating diseases by directly [[Symptomatic treatment|alleviating their symptoms]], as is sometimes done in conventional medicine, is ineffective because all "disease can generally be traced to some latent, deep-seated, underlying chronic, or inherited tendency".<ref> |
|||
{{cite journal |
|||
|url =http://homeoint.org/cazalet/ward/historycase.htm |
|||
|author =Ward JW |
|||
|title=Taking the history of the case |
|||
|journal=Pacific Coast Journal of Homeopathy |
|||
|date=July 1937 |
|||
|access-date =October 22, 2007 |
|||
}}</ref> The underlying imputed miasm still remains, and deep-seated ailments can be corrected only by removing the deeper disturbance of the vital force.<ref name="homphilo"> |
|||
{{cite web |
|||
|title=Cause of disease in homeopathy |
|||
|publisher=Creighton University Department of Pharmacology |
|||
|url=http://altmed.creighton.edu/Homeopathy/philosophy/cause.htm |
|||
|access-date=July 23, 2007 |
|||
|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20091231160035/http://altmed.creighton.edu/Homeopathy/philosophy/cause.htm |
|||
|archive-date=December 31, 2009 |
|||
}}</ref> |
|||
Hahnemann's [[hypotheses]] for miasms originally presented only three local symptoms: psora (the itch), [[syphilis]] (venereal disease) or [[sycosis]] (fig-wart disease).<ref>{{cite EB1911 |wstitle=Homoeopathy |volume=13 |page=645 |first=William Tod |last=Helmuth}}</ref> Of these the most important was ''psora'', described as being related to any itching diseases of the skin and was claimed to be the foundation of many further disease conditions. Hahnemann believed it to be the cause of such diseases as [[epilepsy]], [[cancer]], [[jaundice]], [[deafness]], and [[cataracts]].<ref name="Hahnemann_Chronic"> |
|||
==General philosophy== |
|||
{{cite book |
|||
|author =Hahnemann S |
|||
|title =Die chronischen Krankheiten, ihre eigenthümliche Natur und homöopathische Heilung [The chronic diseases, their specific nature and homoeopathic treatment] |
|||
|url =https://books.google.com/books?id=Xfk3AAAAMAAJ |
|||
|location =[[Dresden]] and [[Leipzig]] |
|||
|publisher =Arnoldische Buchhandlung |
|||
|year =1828 |
|||
}}{{Page needed|date=March 2011}}</ref> Since Hahnemann's time, other miasms have been proposed, some replacing illnesses previously attributed to the psora, including [[tuberculosis]] and [[cancer]] miasms.<ref name="miasms"> |
|||
{{cite web |
|||
|work = Classical homeopathy |
|||
|title = Miasms in homeopathy |
|||
|url = http://homepage.ntlworld.com/homeopathy_advice/Theory/Intermediate/miasm.html |
|||
|author = King S |
|||
|access-date = March 25, 2009 |
|||
|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20090307120146/http://homepage.ntlworld.com/homeopathy_advice/Theory/Intermediate/miasm.html |
|||
|archive-date = March 7, 2009 |
|||
}}</ref> |
|||
Hahnemann's miasm theory remains disputed and controversial within homeopathy even in modern times. The theory of miasms has been criticized as an explanation developed to preserve the system of homeopathy in the face of treatment failures, and for being inadequate to cover the many hundreds of sorts of diseases, as well as for failing to explain disease predispositions, as well as [[genetics]], environmental factors, and the unique disease history of each patient.<ref name="Shelton">{{cite book |last=Shelton |first=JW |year=2004 |title=Homeopathy: How it really works |url=https://archive.org/details/homeopathyhowitr0000shel |url-access=registration |location=Amherst, New York |publisher=[[Prometheus Books]] |isbn=978-1-59102-109-4}}</ref>{{rp|148–9|date=November 2012}} |
|||
Homeopathy is a [[vitalism|vitalist]] philosophy in that it regards diseases and sickness to be caused by disturbances in a hypothetical [[vital force]] or [[life force]] in humans and that these disturbances manifest themselves as unique symptoms. Homeopathy contends that the vital force has the ability to react and adapt to internal and external causes, which homeopaths refer to as the "law of susceptibility". The law of susceptibility states that a negative state of mind can attract hypothetical disease entities called "miasms" to invade the body and produce symptoms of diseases<ref name="homhist1"/>, However, Hahnemann rejected the notion of a disease as a separate thing or invading entity<ref> {{cite web|url=http://julianwinston.com/archives/articles/winston_organon_outline.php |title=OUTLINE OF THE ORGANON |accessdate=2007-08-04 |last=Winston |first=Julian }}</ref> and insisted that it was always part of the "living whole".<ref> {{cite web|url=http://www.homeopathyhome.com/reference/organon/organon.html |title=Organon Of Medicine |accessdate=2007-08-04 |last=Hahnemann |first=Samuel }}</ref> |
|||
===19th century: rise to popularity and early criticism=== |
|||
===Miasms and disease=== |
|||
[[File:Beydeman Gomeopatiya vzir.jpg|thumb|left|''[[Homeopathy Looks at the Horrors of Allopathy]]'', an 1857 painting by Alexander Beydeman, showing historical figures and personifications of homeopathy observing the [[heroic medicine|brutality of medicine]] of the 19th century]]Homeopathy achieved its greatest popularity in the 19th century. It was introduced to the United States in 1825 by Hans Birch Gram, a student of Hahnemann.<ref name="Miller">{{cite book |last=Miller |first=Timothy |author-link=Timothy Miller |title=America's alternative religions |publisher=State University of New York Press, Albany |date=1995 |pages=[https://archive.org/details/americasalternat00mill/page/80 80] |isbn=978-0-7914-2397-4 |url=https://archive.org/details/americasalternat00mill/page/80 }}</ref> The first homeopathic school in the United States opened in 1835 and the [[American Institute of Homeopathy]] was established in 1844. Throughout the 19th century, dozens of homeopathic institutions appeared in Europe and the United States,<ref name="Julian">{{cite web |
|||
|url = http://www.wholehealthnow.com/homeopathy_pro/homeopathy_1825_1849.html |
|||
|title = Homeopathy Timeline |
|||
|access-date = July 23, 2007 |
|||
|website= Whole Health Now |
|||
|archive-date = December 15, 2018 |
|||
|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20181215122834/http://www.wholehealthnow.com/homeopathy_pro/homeopathy_1825_1849.html |
|||
}}</ref> and by 1900, there were 22 homeopathic colleges and 15,000 practitioners in the United States.<ref name="Time19951125" /> |
|||
Because medical practice of the time relied on treatments which were often ineffective and harmful, patients of homeopaths often had better outcomes than those being treated by medical practitioners.<ref name="pmid8885813">{{cite journal |last1=Ernst |first1=E. |last2=Kaptchuk |first2=TJ |title=Homeopathy revisited |journal=Archives of Internal Medicine |volume=156 |issue=19 |pages=2162–4 |year=1996 |pmid=8885813 |doi=10.1001/archinte.156.19.2162}}</ref> Though ineffective, homeopathic preparations are rarely detrimental, thus users are less likely to be harmed by the treatment that is supposed to be helping them.<ref name="homhist1" /> The relative success of homeopathy in the 19th century may have led to the abandonment of the ineffective and harmful treatments of [[bloodletting]] and purging and begun the move towards more effective, [[science-based medicine]].<ref name="kaufmanm"> |
|||
The theory of miasms was conceived by Hahnemann because he was concerned about the failure of his homeopathic remedies to produce lasting cures for chronic diseases. He noted that ''"...the non-venereal chronic diseases, after being time and again removed homoeopathically … always returned in a more or less varied form and with new symptoms."'' Hahnemann explained this by associating various miasms with specific diseases that have historically plagued mankind. Hahnemann envisioned various miasms and each separate miasm being responsible for various types of diseases. One of the main miasms was called the "psora"([[Greek]] for ''itch'') and was described as being related to any itching diseases of the skin, and in homeopathy is thought to be the foundation of many disease conditions. Hahnemann viewed psora as primarily derived from suppressed scabies. On Psora, Hahnemann stated it is "''the only real fundamental cause and producer of all the other numerous, I may say innumerable, forms of disease...''"<ref>Organon § 80</ref> Hahnemann asserted Psora to be the cause of such diseases as [[epilepsy]], [[cancer]], [[jaundice]], [[deafness]], and [[cataracts]]. Originally Hahnemann presented only three miasms, others have been added by homeopaths during the last 200 years since their inception, including [[Tuberculosis|tubercular]] miasms and [[cancer]] miasms.<ref name=ntlworld> {{cite web|url=http://homepage.ntlworld.com/homeopathy_advice/Theory/Intermediate/miasm.html |title=Miasms in homeopathy |accessdate=2007-07-24 }}</ref> |
|||
{{cite book |
|||
|author =Kaufman M |
|||
|title =Homeopathy in America: The rise and fall of a medical heresy |
|||
|publisher =[[The Johns Hopkins University Press]] |
|||
|year =1971 |
|||
|isbn =978-0-8018-1238-5 |
|||
}}{{Page needed|date=March 2011}}</ref> One reason for the growing popularity of homeopathy was its apparent success in treating people suffering from infectious disease epidemics.<ref> |
|||
{{cite book |
|||
|author =Coulter HL |
|||
|year =1973 |
|||
|title =Divided Legacy |
|||
|pages =II:544–46; III:267–70, 298–305 |
|||
|location =Berkeley |
|||
|publisher =North Atlantic |
|||
|oclc =9538442 |
|||
}}</ref> During 19th-century epidemics of diseases such as [[cholera]], death rates in homeopathic hospitals were often lower than in conventional hospitals, where the treatments used at the time were often harmful and did little or nothing to combat the diseases.<ref>Death rates in conventional hospitals were typically two- to eight-fold higher than in homeopathic hospitals for patients with these infectious diseases; see |
|||
{{cite book |
|||
|title =The logic of figures or comparative results of homeopathic and other treatments |
|||
|author =Bradford TL |
|||
|publisher =Kessinger |
|||
|year =2007 |
|||
|orig-date =1900 |
|||
|isbn =978-1-4304-8892-7 |
|||
}}{{Page needed|date=March 2011}}</ref> |
|||
Even during its rise in popularity, homeopathy was criticized by scientists and physicians. [[John Forbes (physician)|Sir John Forbes]], physician to [[Victoria of the United Kingdom|Queen Victoria]], said in 1843 that the extremely small doses of homeopathy were regularly derided as useless and considered it "an outrage to human reason".<ref name="John_Forbes"> |
|||
This idea of miasms was first introduced in 1828<ref>The Chronic Diseases, their Nature and Homoeopathic Treatment, [[Dresden]] and [[Leipsic]], Arnold. Vols. 1, 2, 3, 1828; vol. 4, 1830</ref>, though Hahnemann first suspected something similar to miasms as early as 1816. According to Hahnemann, miasmatic infection causes local symptoms, usually in the skin. If these are suppressed by external medication, the hidden cause goes deeper, and manifests itself later as organ pathologies.<ref name="ntlworld"/> Homeopathy contends that treating symptoms by directly opposing their actions, as is done in conventional medicine, is not effective in treating diseases because the miasms still remain, and that the only way to correct the ailments is to correct the disturbance of the vital force.<ref name=homphilo>{{cite news | first= | last= | coauthors= | title=Cause of Disease in homeopathy | date= | publisher= Creighton University Department of Pharmacology | url =http://altmed.creighton.edu/Homeopathy/philosophy/cause.htm | work = | pages = | accessdate = 2007-07-23 | language = }}</ref> |
|||
{{cite book |
|||
|author =Forbes J |
|||
|title =Homeopathy, allopathy and young physic |
|||
|location =London |
|||
|year =1846 |
|||
}}</ref> [[James Young Simpson]] said in 1853 of the highly diluted drugs: "No poison, however strong or powerful, the billionth or decillionth of which would in the least degree affect a man or harm a fly."<ref> |
|||
{{cite book |
|||
|author =Simpson JY |
|||
|title =Homoeopathy, its tenets and tendencies, theoretical, theological and therapeutical |
|||
|location =Edinburgh |
|||
|publisher =Sutherland & Knox |
|||
|year =1853 |
|||
|page =11 |
|||
}}</ref> Nineteenth-century American physician and author [[Oliver Wendell Holmes Sr.|Oliver Wendell Holmes]] was also a vocal critic of homeopathy and published an essay entitled ''[[Homœopathy and Its Kindred Delusions]]'' (1842).<ref name="Holmes" /> The members of the French Homeopathic Society observed in 1867 that some leading homeopaths of Europe not only were abandoning the practice of administering infinitesimal doses but were also no longer defending it.<ref> |
|||
{{cite journal |
|||
|title =Homœopathists vs homœopathy |
|||
|editor =Allen JA |
|||
|journal =Chic Med J |
|||
|pages =268–69 |
|||
|year =1867 |
|||
|volume =24 |
|||
|issue =6 |
|||
|pmid =37412875 |
|||
|pmc =9801777 |
|||
|url =https://books.google.com/books?id=R08VAAAAYAAJ&q=leading+europe+abandoning&pg=PA268 |
|||
}}</ref> The last school in the United States exclusively teaching homeopathy closed in 1920.<ref name="homhist1" /> |
|||
=== Revival in the 20th century === |
|||
===Law of similars=== |
|||
According to academics {{Interlanguage link|Paul U. Unschuld|lt=|de||WD=}} and [[Edzard Ernst]], the [[Nazi]] regime in Germany was fond of homeopathy, and spent large sums of money on researching its mechanisms, but without gaining a positive result.<ref>{{Cite news|last=Ernst|first=Edzard|title=Standing up for the truth about homeopathy and Nazi medicine|url=https://www.irishtimes.com/culture/books/standing-up-for-the-truth-about-homeopathy-and-nazi-medicine-1.2138835|access-date=2020-10-26|newspaper=The Irish Times|language=en}}</ref> Unschuld also states that homeopathy never subsequently took root in the [[United States]], but remained more deeply established in European thinking.<ref name="Unschuld2009">{{cite book|author=Paul Ulrich Unschuld|title=What Is Medicine?: Western and Eastern Approaches to Healing|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=bPMTlS1pzEUC&pg=PA171|access-date=September 7, 2013|date=August 9, 2009|publisher=University of California Press|isbn=978-0-520-94470-1|page=171}}</ref> In the United States, the ''[[Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act|Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act]]'' of 1938 (sponsored by [[Royal S. Copeland|Royal Copeland]], a [[United States Senate|Senator]] from [[New York (state)|New York]] and homeopathic physician) recognized homeopathic preparations as drugs. In the 1950s, there were only 75 solely homeopathic practitioners in the U.S.<ref> |
|||
{{cite news |
|||
|title =Homeopathic Hassle |
|||
|url =http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,891760,00.html |
|||
|archive-url =https://web.archive.org/web/20081214115339/http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,891760,00.html |
|||
|archive-date =December 14, 2008 |
|||
|magazine =[[Time (magazine)|Time]] |
|||
|date =August 20, 1956 |
|||
}}</ref> By the mid to late 1970s, homeopathy made a significant comeback and the sales of some homeopathic companies increased tenfold.<ref name="rader"> |
|||
{{cite news |
|||
|date =March 1, 1985 |
|||
|publisher =FDA Consumer Magazine |
|||
|author =Rader WM |
|||
|url =http://www.homeowatch.org/history/fdac1.html |
|||
|title =Riding the coattails of homeopathy's revival |
|||
}}</ref> |
|||
Some homeopaths credit the revival to Greek homeopath [[George Vithoulkas]], who conducted a "great deal of research to update the scenarios and refine the theories and practice of homeopathy" in the 1970s,<ref name="pmid12614092">{{Cite journal |volume=138 |issue=5 |pages=393–99 |last=Jonas |first=WB |author2=TJ Kaptchuk |author3=K Linde |title=A critical overview of homeopathy |journal=Annals of Internal Medicine |year=2003 |doi=10.7326/0003-4819-138-5-200303040-00009|pmid=12614092 |s2cid=22787732 }}</ref><ref>{{cite book |first=Andrew |last=Lockie |title=Encyclopedia of Homeopathy |url=https://archive.org/details/encyclopediahome00lock_433 |url-access=limited |publisher=[[Dorling Kindersley]] |year=2000 |location=New York |edition=1st |page=[https://archive.org/details/encyclopediahome00lock_433/page/n20 19] |isbn=978-0-7566-1871-1 }}</ref> but Ernst and [[Simon Singh]] consider it to be linked to the rise of the [[New Age movement]].<ref name="isbn0-393-06661-4" /> [[Bruce Hood (psychologist)|Bruce Hood]] has argued that the increased popularity of homeopathy in recent times may be due to the comparatively long consultations practitioners are willing to give their patients, and to a [[appeal to nature|preference for "natural" products]], which people think are the basis of homeopathic preparations.<ref name="Hood2009">{{cite book|author=Bruce M. Hood|title=SuperSense|url=https://archive.org/details/supersensewhyweb00hood|url-access=registration|access-date=September 7, 2013|date=April 7, 2009|publisher=HarperCollins|isbn=978-0-06-186793-4|page=[https://archive.org/details/supersensewhyweb00hood/page/157 157]}}</ref> |
|||
Hahnemann experimented with Cinchona bark, which is used as a treatment of malaria, and observed that the side effects he experienced from the quinine in the Cinchona bark were similar to the symptoms of malaria. He reasoned that treatments for diseases must produce symptoms similar to of those disease being treated when taken by healthy individuals. From this Hahnemann conceived of the "law of similars", otherwise known as "like cures like". Hahnemann believed that by inducing artificial symptoms of a disease, the artificial symptoms would create another disturbance in the vital force thus pushing out the old disturbance and that the body would naturally recover from the artificially induced disturbance. The basic idea is that to cure a person suffering from an illness, one should administer a dilute dose of a substance that produces the same symptoms of the illness being treated in healthy individuals.<ref> {{cite web|url=http://homepage.ntlworld.com/homeopathy_advice/Theory/Intermediate/miasm.html |title=Miasms in homeopathy |accessdate=2007-07-24 }}</ref> |
|||
Towards the end of the century opposition to homeopathy began to increase again; with [[William T. Jarvis]], the President of the [[National Council Against Health Fraud]], saying that "Homeopathy is a fraud perpetrated on the public with the government's blessing, thanks to the abuse of political power of Sen. Royal S. Copeland."<ref>{{cite web|author=William T. Jarvis|author-link=William T. Jarvis|title=Response to Isadora Stehlin "Homeopathy: real medicine or empty promises?" (originally published in ''FDA Consumer'' April 1997)|date=December 15, 2001|url=http://www.homeowatch.org/articles/fdac2.html}}</ref> |
|||
==Development of remedies== |
|||
===21st century: renewed criticism=== |
|||
===Dilution and succussion=== |
|||
[[Image:Mortar2.jpg|thumb|left|160px|Mortar and pestle used for grinding insoluble solids into homeopathic remedies including quartz and oyster shells.]] |
|||
In producing treatments for diseases,homeopaths use a process called "dynamization" or "potentization" where the remedy is diluted into alcohol or water and then vigorously shaken by ten hard strikes against an elastic body in a process called "succussion". Hahnemann thought that the use of remedies which present symptoms similar to those of disease in healthy individuals would only intensify the symptoms and exacerbate the condition, so he advocated the dilution of the remedies to the point the symptoms were no longer experienced. During the process of potentization, homeopaths believe that the vital energy of the diluted substance is activated and it's energy released by vigorous shaking of the substance. For this purpose, Hahnemann had a saddle maker construct a special wooden striking board covered in leather on one side and stuffed with horsehair.<ref>[http://www.igm-bosch.de/english/f10.htm The Institute for the History of Medicine] official website</ref> Insoluble solids, such as [[quartz]] and [[oyster]] shell, are diluted by grinding them with [[lactose]] (''[[trituration]]''). |
|||
Since the beginning of the 21st century, a series of [[Meta-analysis|meta-analyses]] have further shown that the therapeutic claims of homeopathy lack scientific justification.<ref name="champe">{{cite journal |last1=Crockett |first1=Chambers |title=Death by homeopathy: issues for civil, criminal and coronial law and for health service policy |pmid=22558899 |journal=Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics |volume=19 |issue=3 |pages=454–78 |year=2012 }}</ref> This had led to a decrease or suspension of funding by many governments. In a 2010 report, the [[Science and Technology Select Committee|Science and Technology Committee of the United Kingdom House of Commons]] recommended that homeopathy should no longer receive [[National Health Service]] (NHS) funding due its lack of scientific credibility;<ref name="champe" /> NHS funding for homeopathy ceased in 2017.<ref name="TNHS" /> They also asked the [[Department of Health and Social Care|Department of Health]] in the UK to add homeopathic remedies to the list of forbidden prescription items.<ref name="bbc-blacklist" /> |
|||
Three potency scales are in regular use in homeopathy. Hahnemann pioneered and always favored the centesimal or "C scale", diluting a substance 1 part in a 100 of diluent. Some homeopaths developed a decimal scale (D or X) diluting the substance 1 part in 10 of diluent. Hahnemann never used this scale but it was very popular throughout the 19th century and still is in Europe. This potency scale appears to have been introduced in the 1830s by the American homeopath, Dr. Constantine Hering.<ref>{{cite book |
|||
| last = Robert |
|||
| first = Ellis Dudgeon |
|||
| authorlink = |
|||
| coauthors = |
|||
| title = Lectures on the Theory & Practice of Homeopathy |
|||
| publisher = |
|||
| date = 1853 |
|||
| location = London |
|||
| pages = 526-7. |
|||
| url= |
|||
http://books.google.com/books/pdf/Lectures_on_the_theory_and_practice_of_h.pdf?id=UKZ_lqlWPhUC&output=pdf&sig=X5aw7kl9oK-_8kXvc7022__2wVo |
|||
| doi = |
|||
| id = |
|||
| isbn = 81-7021-311-8}}</ref> In the last ten years of his life Hahnemann also developed a quintamillesimal (Q) or LM scale diluting the drug 1 part in 50,000 parts of diluent.<ref> {{cite web|url=http://www.simillimum.com/education/little-library/the-works-of-great-homoeopaths/ham/article04.php |title= Hahnemann's Advanced Methods |accessdate=2007-08-04 |last=Little |first=David |work=Simillimum.com }}</ref> Higher potencies in homeopathy, which are more diluted, are considered to be stronger deep-acting remedies. Hahnemann advocated 30C dilutions for most purposes, i.e. dilution by a factor of 100<sup>30</sup>, and a common homeopathic treatment for the flu is a 200c dilution of duck liver, called ''Oscillococcinum'' in homeopathy. As [[Avogadro's number]] is only 6.022 × 10<sup>23</sup> particles per [[Mole (unit)|mole]], the chance of any molecule of the original substance being present in a 15x solution is very small, and the chances of a single molecule of the original substance remaining in a 24x(12c) dilution would be roughly 1 in 2 billion. For a perspective on these numbers, there are in the order of 10<sup>32</sup> molecules of water in an [[Olympic size swimming pool]] and if such a pool were filled with a homeopathic substance, to expect to get a single molecule from the original substance in a 15C solution, one would need to swallow 1% of the volume of such a pool, or roughly 25 metric tons of water.<ref name=dynam> {{cite web|url=http://altmed.creighton.edu/Homeopathy/philosophy/dilution.htm|title=Dynamization and Dilution |accessdate=2007-07-24 }}</ref> |
|||
In 2015, the [[National Health and Medical Research Council]] of Australia found that "there are no health conditions for which there is reliable evidence that homeopathy is effective".<ref>{{cite web |title=The Australian report |url=https://www.hri-research.org/resources/homeopathy-the-debate/the-australian-report-on-homeopathy/ |website=HRI Research |access-date=13 August 2018|date=April 6, 2017 }}</ref> The federal government only ended up accepting three of the 45 recommendations made by the 2018 review of Pharmacy Remuneration and Regulation.<ref>{{cite news|last1=Abusson|first1=Kate|date=3 May 2018|title=Pharmacies avoid homeopathy ban as government parks recommendations|work=Sydney Morning Herald|url=https://www.smh.com.au/national/pharmacies-avoid-homeopathy-ban-as-government-parks-recommendations-20180503-p4zd94.html|access-date=13 August 2018}}</ref> The same year the US [[Food and Drug Administration]] (FDA) held a hearing requesting public comment on the regulation of homeopathic drugs.<ref name="Science42115">{{cite news|author1=Kelly Servick|date=April 21, 2015|title=FDA takes new look at homeopathy|work=Science|url=https://www.science.org/content/article/fda-takes-new-look-homeopathy|access-date=April 23, 2015|quote=Under FDA guidelines issued in 1988, a company can sell homeopathic products over the counter without demonstrating their safety or efficacy, and―unlike dietary supplements―their packaging can include claims about treating specific conditions, as long as they are "self-limiting" and not chronic. Such conditions include sprains, colds, or allergies.}}</ref> In 2017 the FDA announced it would strengthen regulation of homeopathic products.<ref name="Frazier FDA to Reg">{{cite journal|last1=Frazier|first1=Kendrick|author-link=Kendrick Frazier|date=2018|title=FDA to Regulate Some Homeopathic Products; CFI Hails Move|journal=[[Skeptical Inquirer]]|volume=42|issue=2|page=12}}</ref> |
|||
For more perspective, 1ml of a solution which has gone through a 30C dilution would have been diluted into a volume of water equal to that of a cube of 1,000,000,000,000,000,000 meters per side, or about 105 light years. Thus, homeopathic remedies of the standard dilutions contain, with overwhelming probability, only water. Practitioners of homeopathy believe that this water retains some 'essential property' of the original substance, due to the shaking after each dilution.<ref>G. Resch and V. Gutmann, ''Scientific Foundations of Homoeopathy''</ref> Hahnemann believed that the dynamization or shaking of the of the solution caused a "spirit like" healing force to be released from within the substance. He thought that even after every molecule of the previous substance has been removed from the water, the spiritual healing force still remained.<ref name="dynam"/> |
|||
The American non-profit [[Center for Inquiry]] (CFI) filed a lawsuit in 2018 against the [[CVS Pharmacy|CVS]] pharmacy for consumer fraud over its sale of homeopathic medicines.<ref name="CVS">{{cite press release|author=<!--Staff writer(s); no by-line.-->|title=CENTER FOR INQUIRY SUES CVS FOR FRAUD OVER SALE OF HOMEOPATHIC FAKE MEDICINE|url=https://centerforinquiry.org/press_releases/cfi-sues-cvs/|publisher=Center for Inquiry|date=9 July 2018|access-date=9 July 2018}}</ref> It claimed that CVS was selling homeopathic products on an easier-to-obtain basis than standard medication.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Bellamy|first1=Jann|title=CVS sued for deceiving consumers in sale of homeopathic remedies|url=https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/cvs-sued-for-deceiving-consumers-in-sale-of-homeopathic-remedies/|access-date=22 January 2019|website=Science Based Medicine|date=July 19, 2018}}</ref> In 2019, CFI brought a similar lawsuit against [[Walmart]] for "committing wide-scale consumer fraud and endangering the health of its customers through its sale and marketing of homeopathic medicines".<ref>{{cite magazine|last=Fidalgo|first=Paul|date=September 2019|title=CFI sues Walmart for fraud for selling homeopathic fake medicine|magazine=[[Skeptical Inquirer]]|location=Amherst, NY|publisher=Center for Inquiry}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|last1=Vyse|first1=Stuart|author-link=Stuart Vyse|title=What Should Become of a Monument to Pseudoscience?|url=https://skepticalinquirer.org/exclusive/what-should-become-of-a-monument-to-pseudoscience/|access-date=2 December 2019|website=Skeptical Inquirer|date=July 10, 2019|publisher=Center for Inquiry}}</ref> They also conducted a survey in which they found consumers felt ripped off when informed of the lack of evidence for the efficacy of homeopathic remedies, such as those sold by Walmart and CVS.<ref name="CFISurvey SI 2019">{{cite journal|last1=Frazier|first1=Kendrick|authorlink= Kendrick Frazier|date=2019|title=CFI survey on Homeopathy: Consumers feel scammed by Walmart and CVS|journal=Skeptical Inquirer|volume=43|issue=6|page=7}}</ref><ref name="CFI 2019 Survey">{{cite web|last1=Fidalgo|first1=Paul|title=CONSUMERS FEEL "SCAMMED" BY WALMART AND CVS OVER HOMEOPATHIC FAKE MEDICINE, SURVEY SHOWS|url=https://centerforinquiry.org/press_releases/consumers-feel-scammed-by-walmart-and-cvs-over-homeopathic-fake-medicine/|access-date=9 November 2019|website=Center for Inquiry|date=September 17, 2019}}</ref> |
|||
It should be noted however that not all homeopaths advocated extremely high potencies. Many of the early homeopaths were originally doctors and generally tended to use lower potencies such as "3x" or "6x", rarely going beyond "12x". A good example of this approach is that of Dr. Richard Hughes, who dismissed the extremely high potencies as unnecessary. This was the dominant pattern in [[Europe]] throughout the 1820's to 1930's, but in America many practitioners developed and preferred the higher dilutions. This trend became especially exemplified by James Tyler Kent and dominated US homeopathy from the 1850s until its demise in the 1940s. The split between lower and higher dilutions also followed ideological lines with the former stressing pathology and a strong link to conventional medicine, while the latter emphasized vital force, miasms and a [[spiritual]] take on sickness.<ref>{{cite book |
|||
| last = Edwin Wheeler |
|||
| first = Charles |
|||
| authorlink = |
|||
| coauthors = |
|||
| title = Dr. Hughes: Recollections of Some Masters of Homeopathy |
|||
| publisher = Health Through Homeopathy |
|||
| date = 1941 |
|||
| location = |
|||
| pages = |
|||
| url = |
|||
| doi = |
|||
| id = |
|||
| isbn = }}</ref><ref>{{cite book |
|||
| last = Bodman |
|||
| first = Frank |
|||
| authorlink = |
|||
| coauthors = |
|||
| title = he Richard Hughes Memorial Lecture |
|||
| publisher = BHJ |
|||
| date = 1970 |
|||
| location = |
|||
| pages = 179-93 |
|||
| url = |
|||
| doi = |
|||
| id = |
|||
| isbn = }}</ref> |
|||
In 2021, the French healthcare minister phased out social security reimbursements for homeopathic drugs.<ref name="GuardianFrance" /><ref name="FranceEndFunding2021" /> France has long had a stronger belief in the virtues of homeopathic drugs than many other countries and the world's biggest manufacturer of alternative medicine drugs, [[Boiron]], is located in that country.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-france-health-homeopathy/france-will-end-healthcare-refunds-for-homeopathic-drugs-idUSKCN1U42B6 |title=France will end healthcare refunds for homeopathic drugs |website=[[Reuters]] |date=July 9, 2019}}</ref> Spain has also announced moves to ban homeopathy and other pseudotherapies.<ref name="El Pais 2019-07-30" /> In 2016, the [[University of Barcelona]] cancelled its master's degree in Homeopathy citing "lack of scientific basis", after advice from the Spanish Ministry of Health.<ref>{{cite news|last1=Ansede|first1=Manuel|date=March 4, 2016|title=La Universidad de Barcelona fulmina su máster de homeopatía|newspaper=El País|url=http://elpais.com/elpais/2016/03/01/ciencia/1456856774_534268.html}}</ref> Shortly afterwards the [[University of Valencia]] announced the elimination of its Masters in Homeopathy.<ref>{{cite web|date=April 7, 2016|title=El Máster de Homeopatía de la Universidad de Valencia cancela su edición para el próximo curso.|url=http://www.abc.es/sociedad/abci-master-homeopatia-universidad-valencia-cancela-edicion-para-proximo-curso-201604072200_noticia.html|publisher=Diario ABC}}</ref> |
|||
===Provings=== |
|||
==Preparations and treatment== |
|||
In order to determine which specific remedies could be used to treat which diseases, Hahnemann experimented on himself for several years as well as with patients. His experiments did not initially consist of giving remedies to the sick, because he thought that the most similar remedy, by virtue of its ability to induce symptoms similar to the disease itself, would make it impossible to determine which symptoms came from the remedy and which from the disease itself. Therefore, sick people were excluded from the provings. The method used for determining which remedies were suitable for specific diseases was called "proving". A homeopathic proving is the method by which the [[Profile (engineering)|profile]] of a [[homeopathic remedy]] is determined. The word 'proving' derives from the [[Germany|German]] word 'Prüfung' meaning 'test'. |
|||
{{see also|List of homeopathic preparations}}[[File:Rep1.JPG|thumb|Homeopathic repertory by [[James Tyler Kent]]]] |
|||
Homeopathic preparations are referred to as "homeopathic remedies".<ref name="Consumer Reports">{{cite news |date=December 21, 2015 |title=Homeopathic drugs: No better than placebos? |newspaper=[[The Washington Post]] |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/homeopathic-drugs-no-better-than-placebos/2015/12/18/037b3976-7750-11e5-a958-d889faf561dc_story.html |access-date=December 22, 2015 }}</ref> Practitioners rely on two types of reference when prescribing: ''[[Materia medica]]'' and repertories. A homeopathic ''materia medica'' is a collection of "drug pictures", organized alphabetically. A homeopathic repertory is a quick reference version of the ''materia medica'' that indexes the symptoms and then the associated remedies for each. In both cases different compilers may dispute particular inclusions in the references.<ref>Jonas: Mosby's Dictionary of Complementary and Alternative Medicine. (c) 2005, Elsevier</ref> The first symptomatic homeopathic ''materia medica'' was arranged by Hahnemann. The first homeopathic repertory was Georg Jahr's ''Symptomenkodex'', published in German in 1835, and translated into English as the ''Repertory to the more Characteristic Symptoms of Materia Medica'' in 1838. This version was less focused on disease categories and was the forerunner to later works by [[James Tyler Kent]].<ref name="pmid16322800">{{cite journal|last1=Bellavite|first1=Paolo|last2=Conforti|first2=Anita|last3=Piasere|first3=Valeria|last4=Ortolani|first4=Riccardo|year=2005|title=Immunology and Homeopathy. 1. Historical Background|journal=Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine|volume=2|issue=4|pages=441–52|doi=10.1093/ecam/neh141|pmc=1297514|pmid=16322800}}</ref><ref> |
|||
During the process of proving, Hahnemann used healthy volunteers who were given remedies, often in molecular doses, and the resulting symptoms were compiled by observers into a "Drug Picture". During the process the volunteers were observed for months at a time and were made to keep extensive journals detailing all of their symptoms at specific times during the day. During the tests volunteers were forbidden from consuming coffee, tea, spices, or wine. They were also not allowed to play chess, because Hahnemann considered it to be "too exciting", however they were allowed to drink beer and were encouraged to moderately exercise. After the experiments were over, Hahnemann made the volunteers offer their hands and take an oath swearing that what they reported in their journals was the truth, at which time he would interrogate them extensively concerning their symptoms. <ref> {{cite web|url=http://www.acampbell.ukfsn.org/homeopathy/homeopathy-html/chapter02.html |title=HOMEOPATHY IN PERSPECTIVE |accessdate=2007-07-24 |last=Campbell |first=Anthony }}</ref> |
|||
{{cite book|author=Mathur KN|title=Prinzipien der homöopathischen Verschreibung: Synopsis weltweiter klinischer Erfahrungen|publisher=Georg Thieme Verlag|year=2003|isbn=978-3-8304-9021-0|pages=122–23|language=de|oclc=76518035}}</ref> There are over 118 repertories published in English, with Kent's being one of the most used.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Repertories today and yesterday|url=http://www.homeopathycenter.org/homeopathy-today/repertories-today-and-yesterday|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170414063600/http://www.homeopathycenter.org/homeopathy-today/repertories-today-and-yesterday|archive-date=April 14, 2017|access-date=2020-08-31|website=National Center for Homeopathy}}</ref> |
|||
=== Consultation === |
|||
The first recorded 'proven' drugs were published by Hahnemann in his 1796 ''Essay on a New Principle'' and later in his ''[[Materia Medica Pura]]'' which contained 27 and 65 proven drugs respectively. In his Lectures on Homoeopathic Materia Medica published in 1905, [[James Tyler Kent]] listed 217 remedies, and newer substances are continually added to contemporary versions. |
|||
Homeopaths generally begin with a consultation, which can be a 10–15 minute appointment or last for over an hour, where the patient describes their [[medical history]]. The patient describes the "modalities", or if their symptoms change depending on the weather and other external factors.<ref name="Vickers 1115–11182">{{Cite journal|last1=Vickers|first1=Andrew|last2=Zollman|first2=Catherine|date=1999-10-23|title=Homoeopathy|journal=BMJ: British Medical Journal|volume=319|issue=7217|pages=1115–1118|doi=10.1136/bmj.319.7217.1115|issn=0959-8138|pmc=1116906|pmid=10531108}}</ref> The practitioner also solicits information on mood, likes and dislikes, physical, mental and emotional states, life circumstances, and any physical or emotional illnesses.<ref name="Stehlin"> |
|||
{{cite web|author=Stehlin I|year=1996|title=Homeopathy: Real medicine or empty promises?|url=http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1370/is_n10_v30/ai_18979004/|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090924121418/http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1370/is_n10_v30/ai_18979004/|archive-date=September 24, 2009|access-date=October 1, 2007|publisher=U.S. [[Food and Drug Administration]]}}</ref> This information (also called the "symptom picture") is matched to the "drug picture" in the ''materia medica'' or repertory and used to determine the appropriate homeopathic remedies. In classical homeopathy, the practitioner attempts to match a single preparation to the totality of symptoms (the ''simlilum''), while "clinical homeopathy" involves combinations of preparations based on the illness's symptoms.<ref name="pmid12614092" /> |
|||
=== |
=== Preparation === |
||
[[File:Ambalaj Oscillococcinum.jpg|thumb|left|upright|''[[Oscillococcinum]]'', a homeopathic remedy in pill form]]Homeopathy uses animal, plant, mineral, and synthetic substances in its preparations, generally referring to them using [[Latin]] names.<ref name="WHO Safety">{{Cite web|title=Safety issues in the preparation of homeopathic medicines|url=https://www.who.int/medicines/areas/traditional/Homeopathy.pdf|website=World Health Organization}}</ref> Examples include ''[[arsenicum album]]'' (arsenic oxide), ''natrum muriaticum'' ([[sodium chloride]] or table salt), ''[[Lachesis muta]]'' (the venom of the [[Lachesis (genus)|bushmaster snake]]), ''[[opium]]'', and ''thyroidinum'' ([[thyroid hormone]]). Homeopaths say this is to ensure accuracy.<ref>{{Cite web|title=FAQs|url=https://www.theaahp.org/consumer-information/faqs/|access-date=2020-08-31|website=The American Association of Homeopathic Pharmacists|language=en}}</ref> In the USA the common name must be displayed, although the Latin one can also be present.<ref name="WHO Safety" /> Homeopathic pills are made from an inert substance (often sugars, typically lactose), upon which a drop of liquid homeopathic preparation is placed and allowed to evaporate.<ref name="Ernst2005">{{cite journal|last1=Ernst|first1=E|year=2005|title=Is homeopathy a clinically valuable approach?|url=http://www.dcscience.net/ernst-tips-sept-2005.pdf|journal=Trends in Pharmacological Sciences|volume=26|issue=11|pages=547–48|citeseerx=10.1.1.385.5505|doi=10.1016/j.tips.2005.09.003|pmid=16165225}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|last1=Sagar|first1=SM|year=2007|title=Homeopathy: Does a teaspoon of honey help the medicine go down?|journal=Current Oncology|volume=14|issue=4|pages=126–27|doi=10.3747/co.2007.150|pmc=1948865|pmid=17710203}}</ref> |
|||
[[Image:Rep1.JPG|thumb|right|200px|Homeopathic repertory by James Tyler Kent.]] |
|||
A compilation of reports of many homeopathic provings is known as a [[homeopathic materia medica]]. In practice the usefulness of such a compilation is limited because a practitioner does not need to look up the symptoms for a particular remedy, but rather to explore the remedies for a particular symptom. This need is filled by the ''[[homeopathic repertory]]'', which is an index of symptoms, listing after each symptom those remedies that are associated with it. Repertories are often very extensive and may include data from clinical experience in addition to provings. There is often lively debate among the compilers of a repertory and interested practitioners over the veracity of a particular inclusion. The first symptomatic index of the homeopathic materia medica was arranged by Hahnemann. Soon after, one of his students [[Clemens Maria Franz von Bönninghausen|Clemens von Bönninghausen]], created the ''Therapautic Pocket Book'', another homeopathic repertory. The first such Homeopathic Repertory was Dr. George Jahr's Repertory, published in 1835 in [[German|German language]] and then again in 1838 in English and edited by Dr. Constantine Hering. This version was less focused on disease categories and would be the forerunner to Kent's later works. It consisted of three large volumes. Such Repertories increased in size and detail as time progressed.<ref> {{cite web|url=http://www.crystalinks.com/homeopathy.html |title=HOMEOPATHY |accessdate=2007-08-20 }}</ref> |
|||
Isopathy is a therapy derived from homeopathy in which the preparations come from diseased or pathological products such as fecal, urinary and respiratory discharges, blood, and tissue.<ref name="pmid16322800" /> They are called nosodes (from the Greek ''nosos'', disease) with preparations made from "healthy" specimens being termed "sarcodes". Many so-called "homeopathic vaccines" are a form of isopathy.<ref>{{cite book|author=Kayne SB|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=w2IFcHJYTSYC|title=Homeopathic pharmacy: theory and practice|publisher=Elsevier Health Sciences|year=2006|isbn=978-0-443-10160-1|edition=2|page=171}}</ref> Tautopathy is a form of isopathy where the preparations are composed of drugs or [[vaccine]]s that a person has consumed in the past, in the belief that this can reverse the supposed lingering damage caused by the initial use.<ref>{{Cite book|last=Owen|first=David|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=UZ72uQy385wC&q=Tautopathy&pg=PA56|title=Principles and Practice of Homeopathy: The Therapeutic and Healing Process|date=2007-01-01|publisher=Elsevier Health Sciences|isbn=978-0-443-10089-5|page=56|language=en}}</ref> There is no convincing scientific evidence for isopathy as an effective method of treatment.<ref>{{Cite book|last1=Lack|first1=Caleb W.|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Miy2CwAAQBAJ&q=isopathy+pseudoscience&pg=PA206|title=Critical Thinking, Science, and Pseudoscience: Why We Can't Trust Our Brains|last2=Rousseau|first2=Jacques|date=2016-03-08|publisher=Springer Publishing Company|isbn=978-0-8261-9426-8|page=206|language=en}}</ref> |
|||
==Treatments== |
|||
[[Image:Homoeopathic Medicine.jpg|left|thumb|200px|Homeopathic remedy arsenicum album derived from [[arsenic]].]] |
|||
Some modern homeopaths use preparations they call "imponderables" because they do not originate from a substance but some other phenomenon presumed to have been "captured" by alcohol or [[lactose]].<!--See next two sources, and the rest of the journal issue they came from for more information--> Examples include [[X-ray]]s<ref> |
|||
Homeopathic treatments of patients generally begin with detailed examinations of the patients history including questions regarding one's physical, mental and emotional state, one's life circumstances and presenting physical/emotional illness. Homeopaths then translate a patients entire health status into a complex formula of mental and physical symptoms, including likes, dislikes, innate predispositions and even body type.<ref name="Ramey"/> The goal is to develop a comprehensive representation of the individual's overall health. This information can then be compared with similar established data in the drug provings found in the homeopathic materia medica. Assisted by further dialogs with the patient, the homeopath then aims to find the one drug most closely matching the 'symptom totality' of the patient. There are many methods for determining the most-similar remedy (the ''simillimum''), and homeopaths sometimes disagree. This is partly due to the complexity of the "''totality of symptoms''" concept. That is, homeopaths do not use all symptoms, but decide which are the most characteristic. This subjective evaluation of case analysis relies on knowledge and experience of the homeopath doing the diagnosis.<ref name="Ramey"/> |
|||
{{cite journal |
|||
|vauthors=Lee J, Thompson E |title =X-ray drug picture |
|||
|journal =The Homeopath |
|||
|volume =26 |
|||
|issue =2 |
|||
|pages =43–48 |
|||
|year =2007 |
|||
|issn =0263-3256 |
|||
}}</ref> and [[sunlight]].<ref> |
|||
{{cite journal |
|||
|vauthors=Lee J, Thompson E |title =Postironium – the vastness of the universe knocks me off my feet |
|||
|journal =The Homeopath |
|||
|volume =26 |
|||
|issue =2 |
|||
|pages =49–54 |
|||
|year =2007 |
|||
|issn =0263-3256 |
|||
}}</ref> Another derivative is [[electrohomeopathy]], where an electric bio-energy of therapeutic value is supposedly extracted from plants. Popular in the late nineteenth century, electrohomeopathy is extremely pseudo-scientific.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Kempf|first1=EJ|year=1906|title=European Medicine: A Résumé of Medical Progress During the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries|journal=Medical Library and Historical Journal|volume=4|issue=1|pages=86–100|pmc=1692573|pmid=18340908}}</ref> In 2012, the Allahabad High Court in Uttar Pradesh, India, handed down a decree stating that electrohomeopathy was quackery and no longer recognized it as a system of medicine.<ref name="toie">{{cite news|date=5 March 2012|title=Electro-homeopathy clinics to be sealed after Holi|work=[[The Times of India]]|url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/kanpur/Holi-Electro-homeopathy-clinics-to-be-sealed-after-the-festival/articleshow/12140070.cms|access-date=13 August 2018}}</ref> |
|||
Other minority practices include paper preparations, in which the terms for substances and dilutions are written on pieces of paper and either pinned to the patients' clothing, put in their pockets, or placed under glasses of water that are then given to the patients. [[Radionics]], the use of [[electromagnetic radiation]] such as [[radio wave]]s, can also be used to manufacture preparations. Such practices have been strongly criticized by classical homeopaths as unfounded, speculative, and verging upon magic and superstition.<ref> |
|||
===Remedies=== |
|||
{{cite web |
|||
[[Image:1belladonna.jpg|thumb|200px|Old Homeopathic [[Deadly nightshade|belladona]] remedy.]] |
|||
|url =http://www.askdrshah.com/images/lancet.pdf |
|||
"Remedy" is a technical term used in homeopathy to refer to a substance prepared with a particular procedure and intended for treating patients. Homeopathic practitioners rely on two types of reference when prescribing remedies. The Homeopathic Materia Medicae which is comprised of alphabetical indexes of Drug Pictures organized by remedy and describe the symptom patterns associated with individual remedies. They also rely on homeopathic repertories which consist of indexes of symptoms of diseases and listing all remedies associated with specific symptoms.<ref> {{cite web|url=http://www.elixirs.com/medica.htm |title=Materia Medica: Remedy Information |accessdate=2007-07-24 |last=Jones |first=Kathryn }}</ref> |
|||
|title=Call for introspection and awakening |
|||
|publisher =Life Force Center |
|||
|access-date =July 24, 2007 |
|||
|author =Shah R |
|||
|archive-url =https://web.archive.org/web/20070202082349/http://www.askdrshah.com/images/lancet.pdf |archive-date=February 2, 2007}}</ref><ref name="Barwell"> |
|||
{{cite journal |
|||
|url = http://www.homeopathy.ac.nz/editorials/2000/vol-20-no-3-june-2000-the-wo-wo-effect/ |
|||
|title = The wo-wo effect |
|||
|access-date = April 2, 2009 |
|||
|author = Barwell B |
|||
|journal = Homoeopathica |
|||
|volume = 20 |
|||
|issue = 3 |
|||
|year = 2000 |
|||
|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20090726180731/http://www.homeopathy.ac.nz/editorials/2000/vol-20-no-3-june-2000-the-wo-wo-effect/ |
|||
|archive-date = July 26, 2009 |
|||
|df = mdy-all |
|||
}}</ref> Flower preparations are produced by placing flowers in water and exposing them to sunlight. The most famous of these are the [[Bach flower remedies]], which were developed by [[Edward Bach]].<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Vanhaselen|first1=R|year=1999|title=The relationship between homeopathy and the Dr Bach system of flower remedies: A critical appraisal|journal=British Homoeopathic Journal|volume=88|issue=3|pages=121–27|doi=10.1054/homp.1999.0308|pmid=10449052}}</ref> |
|||
=== Dilutions === |
|||
Homeopathy uses many animal, plant, mineral, and synthetic substances in it's remedies. Examples include ''Natrum muriaticum'' ([[sodium chloride]] or table salt), ''[[Lachesis muta]]'' (the venom of the [[bushmaster (snake)|bushmaster]] [[snake]]), ''[[Opium]]'', and ''Thyroidinum'' ([[thyroid hormone]]). Homeopaths also use treatments made from diseased or pathological products called ''nosodes'', from the [[Greek]] word ''nosos'', meaning disease. Substances such as fecal, urinary, and respiratory discharges, as well as tissue and blood products, are used in the fabrication of nosodes.<ref name="pmid16322800">{{cite journal |
|||
{{Main|Homeopathic dilutions}} |
|||
|author=Bellavite P, Conforti A, Piasere V, Ortolani R |
|||
|title=Immunology and homeopathy. 1. Historical background |
|||
|journal=Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM |
|||
|volume=2 |
|||
|issue=4 |
|||
|pages=441-52 |
|||
|year=2005 |
|||
|pmid=16322800 |
|||
|doi=10.1093/ecam/neh141 |
|||
|issn= |
|||
}}</ref> Homeopathic remedy prepared from healthy specimens are called ''Sarcodes''. |
|||
[[Image:Hepar.jpg|left|thumb|200px|Old bottle of ''Hepar sulph'' made from [[Calcium sulfide]].]] |
|||
Some modern homeopaths are exploring the use of more esoteric substances, known as "imponderables" because they do not originate from a material but from [[electromagnetic energy]] presumed to have been "captured" by alcohol or lactose. Examples include [[X-ray]]'s, [[sunlight]]<ref> {{cite web|url=http://www.hominf.org/posi/posiintr.htm |title=The Homœopathic Proving of Positronium |accessdate=2007-07-24 |last=Norland |first=Misha |date=1998 }}</ref>, or [[electricity]].<ref> {{cite web|url=http://homeoint.org/clarke/e/elect.htm |title=MATERIA MEDICA |accessdate=2007-07-24 |last=CLARKE |first=John Henry }}</ref> Recent ventures by homeopaths into even more esoteric substances include "[[thunderstorms]]"(collected via rainwater)<ref> {{cite web|url=http://uk.geocities.com/veryscarymary/stormremedy1.html |title=The Homeopathic proving of 'Tempesta' the Storm |accessdate=2007-07-24 |last=English |first=Mary }}</ref> or even samples of the [[Berlin wall]].<ref> {{cite web|url=http://www.biolumanetics.net/tantalus/Cases/BerlinWall.htm |title=THE BERLIN WALL: A REMEDY OF POWER |accessdate=2007-07-24 |last=Wansbrough |first=Charles }}</ref> Today there are about 3,000 different remedies commonly used in homeopathy.<ref> {{cite web|url=http://www.medicinenet.com/script/main/art.asp?articlekey=63203 |title=Homeopathy: Natural Approach or All a Fake? |accessdate=2007-07-24 |last=Doheny |first=Kathleen }}</ref> |
|||
[[File:Arnica montana homéopathie zoom.jpg|thumb|This bottle is labelled ''[[Arnica montana]]'' (wolf's bane) D6, i.e. the nominal dilution is one [[parts per million|part in a million]] (10<sup>'''-6'''</sup>).]]Hahnemann claimed that undiluted doses caused reactions, sometimes dangerous ones, and thus that preparations be given at the lowest possible dose.<ref name="Kayne 53"> |
|||
===Isopathy=== |
|||
{{cite book|author=Kayne SB|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=w2IFcHJYTSYC&q=homeopathic%20proving%20method&pg=PA53|title=Homeopathic pharmacy: theory and practice|publisher=Elsevier Health Sciences|year=2006|isbn=978-0-443-10160-1|edition=2|page=53}}</ref> A solution that is more dilute is described as having a higher "potency", and thus are claimed to be stronger and deeper-acting.<ref> |
|||
{{cite web|title=Glossary of Homeopathic Terms|url=http://altmed.creighton.edu/Homeopathy/Glossary.htm|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121016234338/http://altmed.creighton.edu/Homeopathy/glossary.htm|archive-date=October 16, 2012|access-date=February 15, 2009|publisher=Creighton University Department of Pharmacology|df=mdy-all}}</ref> The general method of dilution is [[serial dilution]], where solvent is added to part of the previous mixture, but the "Korsakovian" method may also be used. In the Korsakovian method, the vessel in which the preparations are manufactured is emptied, refilled with solvent, with the volume of fluid adhering to the walls of the vessel deemed sufficient for the new batch.<ref name="Shelton" />{{rp|270|date=January 2015}} The Korsakovian method is sometimes referred to as K on the label of a homeopathic preparation.<ref>{{cite web|date=January 22, 2011|title=Homeopathy: Diluted out of existence?|url=http://www.scilogs.com/in_scientio_veritas/homeopathy-diluted-out-of-existence/|access-date=June 15, 2015|publisher=scilogs.com/in_scientio_veritas}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=Homeopathic Medicine Potency or Dilution|url=http://www.ritecare.com/homeopathic/guide_potency.asp|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150821064849/http://www.ritecare.com/homeopathic/guide_potency.asp|archive-date=August 21, 2015|access-date=June 15, 2015|publisher=ritecare.com}}</ref> Another method is Fluxion, which dilutes the substance by continuously passing water through the vial.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Winston|first=Julian|date=1989-04-01|title=A brief history of potentizing machines|url=http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000707858980050X|journal=British Homoeopathic Journal|language=en|volume=78|issue=2|pages=59–68|doi=10.1016/S0007-0785(89)80050-X|s2cid=71942187 |issn=0007-0785}}</ref> Insoluble solids, such as [[granite]], [[diamond]], and [[platinum]], are diluted by grinding them with lactose ("[[trituration]]").<ref name="Shelton" />{{rp|23}} |
|||
Three main [[Logarithmic scale|logarithmic]] dilution scales are in regular use in homeopathy. Hahnemann created the "centesimal" or "C scale", diluting a substance by a factor of 100 at each stage. There is also a decimal dilution scale (notated as "X" or "D") in which the preparation is diluted by a factor of 10 at each stage.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ritecare.com/homeopathic/guide_potency.asp|title=Homeopathic Medicine Potency or Dilution|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150821064849/http://www.ritecare.com/homeopathic/guide_potency.asp|archive-date=August 21, 2015|access-date=June 15, 2015}}</ref> The centesimal scale was favoured by Hahnemann for most of his life, although in his last ten years Hahnemann developed a quintamillesimal (Q) scale which diluted the drug 1 part in 50,000.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Adler|first1=U. C.|last2=Adler|first2=M. S.|date=2006|title=Hahnemann's experiments with 50 millesimal potencies: a further review of his casebooks|journal=Homeopathy|volume=95|issue=3|pages=171–181|doi=10.1016/j.homp.2006.03.003|issn=1475-4916|pmid=16815521|s2cid=3760829 }}</ref> A 2C dilution works out to one part of the original substance in 10,000 parts of the solution. In standard chemistry, this produces a substance with a concentration of 0.01% ([[Concentration#Volume-volume percentage|volume-volume percentage]]). A 6C dilution ends up with the original substance diluted by a factor of 100<sup>−6</sup> (one part in one trillion). The end product is usually so diluted as to be indistinguishable from the diluent (pure water, sugar or alcohol).<ref name="Dynamization and Dilution" /><ref name="homsim"> |
|||
Isopathy is a therapy derived [[homoeopathy]] and was invented by Johann Joseph Wilhelm Lux in the [[1830s]].<ref> {{cite web|url=http://alternative-medicine.healthspace.eu/isopathy.php |title=Isopathy |accessdate=2007-07-25 }}</ref> Isopathy differs from homeopathy in general in that the remedies are made up either from things that cause the [[disease]], or from products of the disease such as [[pus]]. Many so-called "homeopathic vaccines" are in fact a form of isopathy.<ref> {{cite web|url=http://www.homeoinfo.com/08_non-classical_topics/is_it_homeopathy/isopathy.php |title=Isopathy |accessdate=2007-07-25 }}</ref> |
|||
{{cite web |
|||
|title = Similia similibus curentur (Like cures like) |
|||
|publisher = Creighton University Department of Pharmacology |
|||
|url = http://altmed.creighton.edu/Homeopathy/philosophy/similia.htm |
|||
|access-date = August 20, 2007 |
|||
|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20070808051756/http://altmed.creighton.edu/Homeopathy/philosophy/similia.htm |
|||
|archive-date = August 8, 2007 |
|||
|df = mdy-all |
|||
}}</ref> The greatest dilution reasonably likely to contain at least one molecule of the original substance is approximately 12C.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Page 3|title=Alternative Medicine: Homeopathy-A Review|url=http://www.ijopjournal.com/File_Folder/57-69.pdf|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150903231608/http://www.ijopjournal.com/File_Folder/57-69.pdf|archive-date=September 3, 2015|access-date=August 10, 2015|publisher=International Journal of Pharmacotherapy|df=mdy-all}}</ref> |
|||
Hahnemann advocated dilutions of 1 part to 10<sup>60</sup> or 30C.<ref name="Organon_6th_128"> |
|||
===Tautopathy=== |
|||
{{cite book |
|||
Tautopathy is a practice of [[alternative medicine]] that is similar to [[homeopathy]] in that it uses very diluted substances to treat illness. However, tautopathy does not rely on the [[law of similars]], as homeopathy does. According to practitioners of Tautopathy, dilute solutions of lead and arsenic can cause the body to secrete excess amounts of these toxic metals.<ref>[http://www.hpathy.com/tautopathy/tautopathy.asp ''Tautopathy - An Introduction''], Manish Bhatia, Tautopathy, [http://www.hpathy.com/ Homeopathy for Everyone: Everything Homeopathic!]</ref> |
|||
|author =Hahnemann S |
|||
|title =The Organon of the Healing Art |
|||
|year =1921 |
|||
|publisher =Keats Pub. |
|||
|edition =6th |
|||
|at =aphorism 128 |
|||
|isbn =978-0-87983-228-5 |
|||
}}</ref> Hahnemann regularly used dilutions of up to 30C but opined that "there must be a limit to the matter".<ref name="Haehl1922" />{{rp|322|date=January 2015}} To counter the reduced potency at high dilutions he formed the view that vigorous shaking by striking on an elastic surface – a process termed ''succussion'' – was necessary.<ref name="Kayne 53" /> Homeopaths are unable to agree on the number and force of strikes needed, and there is no way that the claimed results of succussion can be tested.<ref name="Shelton" />{{rp|67–69|date=January 2015}} |
|||
Critics of homeopathy commonly emphasize the dilutions involved in homeopathy, using analogies.<ref name="Appendix2">For further discussion of homeopathic dilutions and the mathematics involved, see [[Homeopathic dilutions]].</ref> One mathematically correct example is that a 12C solution is equivalent to "a pinch of salt in both the North and South Atlantic Oceans".<ref name="Bambridge"> |
|||
===Veterinary homeopathy=== |
|||
{{cite book|author=Bambridge AD|title=Homeopathy investigated|publisher=Diasozo Trust|year=1989|isbn=978-0-948171-20-8|location=[[Kent, England|Kent]], England}}</ref><ref name="Andrews"> |
|||
{{cite web|author=Andrews P|year=1990|title=Homeopathy and Hinduism|url=http://www.watchman.org/na/homeopth.htm|publisher=[[Watchman Fellowship]]|periodical=The Watchman Expositor|volume=7|issue=3}}</ref><ref> |
|||
A 12C solution produced using [[sodium chloride]] (also called ''natrum muriaticum'' in homeopathy) is the equivalent of dissolving 0.36 mL of table salt, weighing about 0.77 g, into a volume of water the size of the Atlantic Ocean, since the volume of the Atlantic Ocean and its adjacent seas is 3.55×10<sup>8</sup> km<sup>3</sup> or 3.55×10<sup>20</sup> L : |
|||
{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=6J0TAAAAYAAJ&q=355+x+106+km3+in+the+whole|title=The geology of the Atlantic Ocean|vauthors=Emery KO, Uchupi E|publisher=Springer|year=1984|isbn=978-0-387-96032-6}}</ref> One-third of a [[Drop (volume)|drop]] of some original substance diluted into all the water on Earth would produce a preparation with a concentration of about 13C.<ref name="Appendix2" /><ref>The volume of all water on earth is about 1.36×10<sup>9</sup> km<sup>3</sup>: |
|||
{{cite web |
|||
|url = http://ga.water.usgs.gov/edu/waterdistribution.html |
|||
|title = Earth's water distribution |
|||
|website= [[United States Geological Survey]] |
|||
|date = August 28, 2006 |
|||
|access-date = March 14, 2008 |
|||
|archive-date = June 29, 2012 |
|||
|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20120629055146/http://ga.water.usgs.gov/edu/waterdistribution.html |
|||
}}</ref><ref>Gleick PH, ''Water resources'', In |
|||
{{cite book |
|||
|title =Encyclopedia of climate and weather |
|||
|editor1 =Schneider SH |
|||
|publisher =[[Oxford University Press]] |
|||
|location =New York |
|||
|volume =2 |
|||
|year =1996 |
|||
|pages =817–823 |
|||
}}</ref> [[Robert L. Park]] points out that a 200C dilution of duck liver, marketed under the name [[Oscillococcinum]], would require 10<sup>320</sup> universes worth of molecules to contain just one original molecule in the final substance.<ref>{{cite book |
|||
|title =Superstition: Belief in the Age of Science |
|||
|url =https://archive.org/details/superstitionbeli00park |
|||
|url-access =limited |
|||
|author =Robert L. Park |
|||
|author-link =Robert L. Park |
|||
|publisher =Princeton University Press |
|||
|year =2008 |
|||
|pages =[https://archive.org/details/superstitionbeli00park/page/n157 145]–46 |
|||
|isbn=978-0-691-13355-3}}</ref> The high dilutions characteristically used are often considered to be the most controversial and implausible aspect of homeopathy.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Fisher |first1=P |title=The Memory of Water: a scientific heresy? |journal=Homeopathy |volume=96 |issue=3 |pages=141–2 |year=2007 |pmid=17678808 |doi=10.1016/j.homp.2007.05.008|s2cid=3737723 }}</ref> |
|||
===Provings=== |
|||
Veterinary homeopathy is the term used to describe the treatment of animals with [[homeopathy]]. Hahnemann himself however did none of his work on animals and classical homeopathic principles would seem to conflict with the idea of homeopathic treatments for non humans as syphilis and gonorrhea aren't conditions that are recognized in animals.<ref name="Ramey"/> In the [[USA]] veterinary homeopathy is used by [[veterinarian]] members of the Academy for Veterinary Homeopathy and/or the American Holistic Veterinary Medical Association.<ref> {{cite web|url=http://www.hompath.net/allopathy/clinical-trials.php |title=Clinical trials |accessdate=2007-07-24 }}</ref> In the [[UK]], [[veterinary surgeon]]s who use homeopathy belong to the [[Faculty of Homeopathy]] and/or to the [[British Association of Homeopathic Veterinary Surgeons]] or [[BAHVS]]. Animals may only be treated by qualified veterinary surgeons in the UK and some other countries. Internationally, the body that supports and represents homeopathic veterinarians is the [[International Association for Veterinary Homeopathy]] or [[IAVH]]. There have been no rigorous scientific demonstrations of therapeutic effects of homeopathy in veterinary medicine and a German review of homeopathy in veterinary medicine has stated that the medical effectiveness of homeopathy in higher dilutions is not verified and that giving an animal a placebo can play an active role in influencing the owner to believe in the effectiveness of the treatment when none exists.<ref name="Ramey"/> |
|||
Homeopaths claim that they can determine the properties of their preparations by following a method which they call "proving".<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Dantas |first1=F |last2=Fisher |first2=P |last3=Walach |first3=H |last4=Wieland |first4=F |last5=Rastogi |first5=D |last6=Teixeira |first6=H |last7=Koster |first7=D |last8=Jansen |first8=J |last9=Eizayaga |first9=J |title=A systematic review of the quality of homeopathic pathogenetic trials published from 1945 to 1995 |journal=Homeopathy |volume=96 |issue=1 |pages=4–16 |year=2007 |pmid=17227742 |doi=10.1016/j.homp.2006.11.005|s2cid=3689226 }}</ref> As performed by Hahnemann, provings involved administering various preparations to healthy volunteers. The volunteers were then observed, often for months at a time. They were made to keep extensive journals detailing all of their symptoms at specific times throughout the day. They were forbidden from consuming coffee, tea, spices, or wine for the duration of the experiment; playing chess was also prohibited because Hahnemann considered it to be "too exciting", though they were allowed to drink beer and encouraged to exercise in moderation.<ref>{{cite book|last1=Bradford|first1=Thomas Lindsley|title=The Life and Letters of Dr. Samuel Hahnemann|date=1895|publisher=Boericke & Tafel|location=Philadelphia|isbn=978-1-330-00150-9|pages=[https://archive.org/details/lifelettersofdrs00brad/page/103 103]–04|url=https://archive.org/details/lifelettersofdrs00brad|access-date=August 27, 2015}}</ref> At first Hahnemann used undiluted doses for provings, but he later advocated provings with preparations at a 30C dilution,<ref name="Organon_6th_128" /> and most modern provings are carried out using ultra-dilute preparations.<ref> |
|||
{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=w2IFcHJYTSYC&q=homeopathic+proving+method&pg=PA52|title=Homeopathic pharmacy: theory and practice|author=Kayne SB|publisher=Elsevier Health Sciences|year=2006|isbn=978-0-443-10160-1|edition=2|page=52}}</ref> |
|||
Provings are claimed to have been important in the development of the [[clinical trial]], due to their early use of simple control groups, systematic and quantitative procedures, and some of the first application of [[statistics]] in medicine.<ref> |
|||
{{cite book |
|||
|author=Cassedy JH |
|||
|title=American Medicine and Statistical Thinking, 1800–1860 |
|||
|publisher=iUniverse |
|||
|year=1999 |
|||
|isbn=978-1-58348-428-9 |
|||
}}{{Page needed|date=March 2011}}</ref> The lengthy records of [[self-experimentation]] by homeopaths have occasionally proven useful in the development of modern drugs: For example, evidence that [[nitroglycerin]] might be useful as a treatment for [[angina pectoris|angina]] was discovered by looking through homeopathic provings, though homeopaths themselves never used it for that purpose at that time.<ref name="pmid2866851"> |
|||
{{cite journal |
|||
|author=Fye WB |
|||
|title=Nitroglycerin: a homeopathic remedy |
|||
|journal=Circulation |
|||
|volume=73 |
|||
|issue=1 |
|||
|pages=21–29 |
|||
|year=1986 |
|||
|pmid=2866851 |
|||
|doi=10.1161/01.CIR.73.1.21 |
|||
|doi-access=free |
|||
}}</ref> The first recorded provings were published by Hahnemann in his 1796 ''Essay on a New Principle''.<ref> |
|||
{{cite journal |
|||
|author=Hahnemann S |
|||
|title=Versuch über ein neues Prinzip zur Auffindung der Heilkräfte der Arzneisubstanzen, nebst einigen Blicken auf die bisherigen |
|||
|journal=[[Journal der Practischen Heilkunde]] |
|||
|editor=C. W. Hufelands |
|||
|language=de |
|||
|volume=II |
|||
|issue=3 |
|||
|year=1796 |
|||
}}</ref> His ''Fragmenta de Viribus'' (1805)<ref> |
|||
{{cite book |
|||
|title=Fragmenta de Viribus medicamentorum Positivis |
|||
|author=Hahnemann S |
|||
|language=la |
|||
|location=Leipzig |
|||
|year=1805 |
|||
}}</ref> contained the results of 27 provings, and his 1810 ''Materia Medica Pura'' contained 65.<ref> |
|||
{{cite book |
|||
|title=Materia medica pura; sive, Doctrina de medicamentorum viribus in corpore humano sano observatis; e Germanico sermone in Latinum conversa |
|||
|vauthors=Hahnemann S, Stapf E, Gross G, de Brunnow EG |language=la |
|||
|location=Dresden |
|||
|publisher=Arnold |
|||
|year=1826–1828 |
|||
|oclc=14840659 |
|||
}}</ref> For James Tyler Kent's 1905 ''Lectures on Homoeopathic Materia Medica'', 217 preparations underwent provings and newer substances are continually added to contemporary versions.<ref>{{Cite book|last=Kent|first=James Tyler|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=c-ArAQAAMAAJ|title=Lectures on Homoeopathic Materia Medica|date=1905|publisher=Boericke & Tafel|isbn=978-0-7222-9856-5|language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|last=Kent|first=James Tyler|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=RZtEPAAACAAJ|title=Lectures on Homoeopathic Materia Medica: Together With Kent's "New Remedies" Incorporated and Arranged in One Alphabetical Order|date=2020-03-31|publisher=B. Jain Publishers (P) Limited|isbn=978-81-319-0259-2|language=en}}</ref> |
|||
Though the proving process has superficial similarities with clinical trials, it is fundamentally different in that the process is subjective, not [[Blind test|blinded]], and modern provings are unlikely to use pharmacologically active levels of the substance under proving.<ref name="Creighton">{{cite web |url=http://altmed.creighton.edu/Homeopathy/science/validity.htm |title=Are the principles of Homeopathy scientifically valid? |publisher=Creighton University School of Medicine |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120816233729/http://altmed.creighton.edu/Homeopathy/science/validity.htm |archive-date=August 16, 2012 |df=mdy-all }}</ref> As early as 1842, Oliver Holmes had noted that provings were impossibly vague, and the purported effect was not repeatable among different subjects.<ref name="Holmes" /> |
|||
== Evidence and efficacy == |
|||
==Popularity of homeopathy== |
|||
{{main|Evidence and efficacy of homeopathy}} |
|||
[[Image:WomanHomeopathy.jpg||right|thumb|220px|Woman looking at homeopathic remedies.]] |
|||
Outside of the [[alternative medicine]] community, scientists have long considered homeopathy a sham<ref name="aaci2">{{cite journal|last1=Caulfield|first1=Timothy|last2=Rachul|first2=Christen|year=2011|title=Supported by science?: What Canadian naturopaths advertise to the public|journal=Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology|volume=7|issue=1 |page=14|doi=10.1186/1710-1492-7-14|pmc=3182944|pmid=21920039|quote=Within the non-CAM scientific community, homeopathy has long been viewed as a sham|author-link1=Timothy Caulfield |doi-access=free }}</ref> or a [[pseudoscience]],<ref name="Tuomela p83-101">{{cite book |author=Tuomela, R |title=Rational Changes in Science |chapter=Science, Protoscience, and Pseudoscience |publisher=Springer |year=1987 |isbn=978-94-010-8181-8 |veditors=Pitt JC, Marcello P |series=Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science |volume=98 |pages=83–101 |doi=10.1007/978-94-009-3779-6_4 |author-link=Raimo Tuomela|issn = 0068-0346}}</ref><ref name="Why">{{cite journal |vauthors=Mukerji N, Ernst E |title=Why homoeopathy is pseudoscience |journal=Synthese |date=14 September 2022 |volume=200 |issue=5 |eissn=1573-0964 |doi=10.1007/s11229-022-03882-w |pmid=|s2cid=252297716 |url= |doi-access=free }}</ref><ref name="Baran20142">{{cite book|vauthors=Baran GR, Kiana MF, Samuel SP|title=Healthcare and Biomedical Technology in the 21st Century |chapter=Science, Pseudoscience, and Not Science: How do They Differ? |publisher=Springer|year=2014|isbn=978-1-4614-8540-7|pages=19–57|doi=10.1007/978-1-4614-8541-4_2|quote=within the traditional medical community it is considered to be quackery}}</ref><ref name="Ladyman2">{{cite book|author=Ladyman J|title=Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem|publisher=University of Chicago Press|year=2013|isbn=978-0-226-05196-3|veditors=Pigliucci M, Boudry M|pages=48–49|chapter=Chapter 3: Towards a Demarcation of Science from Pseudoscience|quote=Yet homeopathy is a paradigmatic example of pseudoscience. It is neither simply bad science nor science fraud, but rather profoundly departs from scientific method and theories while being described as scientific by some of its adherents (often sincerely).}}</ref> and the medical community regards it as [[quackery]].<ref name="Baran20142" /> There is an overall absence of sound [[statistical evidence]] of therapeutic efficacy, which is consistent with the lack of any [[Biological plausibility|biologically plausible]] pharmacological [[Active ingredient|agent]] or mechanism.<ref name="pmid124926032" /> Proponents argue that homeopathic medicines must work by some, as yet undefined, biophysical mechanism.<ref name="Vickers 1115–11182" /> No homeopathic preparation has been shown to be different from [[placebo]].<ref name="pmid124926032" /> |
|||
There are estimated to be more than 100,000 physicians practicing homeopathy worldwide, with an estimated 500 million people receiving treatment.<ref name=numbers> {{cite web|url=http://www.dw-world.de/dw/article/0,1564,1575855,00.html |title=Homeopathy Seeks More Acknowledgement |accessdate=2007-07-24 |publisher=[[Deutsche Welle]] }}</ref> More than 12,000 medical doctors and licensed health care practitioners administer homeopathic treatment in the UK, [[France]], and [[Germany]]. Homeopathy is particularly popular in Europe and India,<ref>[http://indianmedicine.nic.in/html/homoeopathy/homoe.htm Homeopathy], Department of [[Ayurveda]], [[Yoga]] & [[Naturopathy]], [[Unani]], [[Suddha medicine|Suddha]] and Homeopathy, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, [[Government of India]].</ref><ref name=Ward>[http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/309/6947/107 ''Medicine in Europe: Complementary medicine in Europe''], Fisher, P. Ward, A. , ''BMJ'' 1994;309:107-111, PMID 8038643</ref> although less so in the USA,<ref>[http://www.cababstractsplus.org/google/abstract.asp?AcNo=20053046923 ''Trends in use of complementary and alternative medicine by US adults: 1997-2002''], Davis, R. B., Phillips, R. S., Eisenberg, D. M., Tindle, H. A, Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine, 2005 (Vol. 11) (No. 1) 42-49</ref>. Surveys taken between 1985 and 1992 found that the percentage of the population that reported having used homeopathy at some time for various countries was: |
|||
{|class="wikitable" |
|||
!width="150"|Country |
|||
!width="200"|Percentage of population using homeopathy<ref>[http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/309/6947/107 Fisher, P. Ward, A. "Medicine in Europe: Complementary medicine in Europe" ''BMJ'' 1994;309:107-111]</ref> |
|||
|-align="center" |
|||
|Belgium||5.8% <ref> {{cite web|url=http://www.statbel.fgov.be/figures/d361_nl.asp#6 |title=Gezondheid - subjectieve beleving en gezondheidsgedrag |accessdate=2007-07-24 |publisher=Statbel.fgov.be }}</ref> |
|||
|-align="center" |
|||
|Denmark||28% |
|||
|-align="center" |
|||
|France||32% |
|||
|-align="center" |
|||
|Netherlands||31% |
|||
|-align="center" |
|||
|Sweden||15% |
|||
|-align="center" |
|||
|UK||16% |
|||
|-align="center" |
|||
|USA||3% |
|||
|}</TD> |
|||
=== Lack of scientific evidence === |
|||
A more recent study indicates that the percentage of people seeking homeopathic treatment in the United States significantly declined from 3.4% in 1997 to 1.7% in 2002.<ref>Tindle HA, Davis RB, Phillips RS, Eisenberg DM. ''Trends in use of complementary and alternative medicine by US adults: 1997-2002.'' Altern Ther Health Med. 2005 Jan-Feb;11(1):42-9.</ref> |
|||
The lack of convincing scientific evidence supporting its efficacy<ref name="Adler2">{{Cite news|author=Adler J|date=February 4, 2004|title=No way to treat the dying|magazine=[[Newsweek]]|url=http://www.newsweek.com/id/105581}}</ref> and its use of preparations without active ingredients have led to characterizations of homeopathy as pseudoscience and quackery,<ref name="Dearden2">{{cite news|last=Dearden|first=Lizzie|date=February 7, 2017|title=Russian Academy of Sciences says homeopathy is dangerous 'pseudoscience' that does not work|newspaper=[[The Independent]]|url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/russia-academy-of-sciences-homeopathy-treaments-pseudoscience-does-not-work-par-magic-a7566406.html|access-date=February 7, 2017}}</ref><ref name="pmid146761792">{{cite journal|last1=Atwood|first1=KC|year=2003|title="Neurocranial restructuring" and homeopathy, neither complementary nor alternative|journal=Archives of Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery|volume=129|issue=12|pages=1356–57|doi=10.1001/archotol.129.12.1356|pmid=14676179}}</ref><ref name="NdububaQuack2">{{cite journal|last1=Ndububa|first1=VI|year=2007|title=Medical quackery in Nigeria; why the silence?|journal=Nigerian Journal of Medicine|volume=16|issue=4|pages=312–17|doi=10.4314/njm.v16i4.37328|pmid=18080586|doi-access=free}}</ref> or, in the words of a 1998 medical review, "placebo therapy at best and quackery at worst".<ref name="Ernst2">{{cite journal|last1=Ernst|first1=E|last2=Pittler|first2=MH|year=1998|title=Efficacy of homeopathic arnica: a systematic review of placebo-controlled clinical trials|journal=Archives of Surgery|volume=133|issue=11|pages=1187–90|doi=10.1001/archsurg.133.11.1187|pmid=9820349|doi-access=free}}</ref> The [[Russian Academy of Sciences]] considers homeopathy a "dangerous 'pseudoscience' that does not work", and "urges people to treat homeopathy 'on a par with magic{{'"}}.<ref name="Dearden2" /> The Chief Medical Officer for England, [[Sally Davies (doctor)|Dame Sally Davies]], has stated that homeopathic preparations are "rubbish" and do not serve as anything more than placebos.<ref>{{cite news|last=Silverman|first=Rosa|title=Homeopathy is 'rubbish', says chief medical officer|work=[[The Daily Telegraph]]|location=London|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/9822744/Homeopathy-is-rubbish-says-chief-medical-officer.html|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130126102237/http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/9822744/Homeopathy-is-rubbish-says-chief-medical-officer.html|archive-date=January 26, 2013|access-date=January 24, 2013|issn=0307-1235|oclc=49632006}}</ref> In 2013, [[Mark Walport]], the UK [[Government Chief Scientific Adviser]] and head of the [[Government Office for Science]] said "homeopathy is nonsense, it is non-science."<ref name="Collins2">{{cite news|author=Nick Collins|date=April 18, 2013|title=Homeopathy is nonsense, says new chief scientist|work=[[The Daily Telegraph]]|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/10003680/Homeopathy-is-nonsense-says-new-chief-scientist.html|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130420234704/http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/10003680/Homeopathy-is-nonsense-says-new-chief-scientist.html|archive-date=April 20, 2013}}</ref> His predecessor, [[John Beddington]], also said that homeopathy "has no underpinning of scientific basis" and is being "fundamentally ignored" by the Government.<ref>{{Cite web|last=Gray|first=Richard|date=April 9, 2013|title=Homeopathy on the NHS is 'mad' says outgoing scientific adviser|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/health/news/9982234/Homeopathy-on-the-NHS-is-mad-says-outgoing-scientific-adviser.html |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220111/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/health/news/9982234/Homeopathy-on-the-NHS-is-mad-says-outgoing-scientific-adviser.html |archive-date=January 11, 2022 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live|access-date=2020-10-28|website=The Telegraph|language=en-GB}}{{cbignore}}</ref> |
|||
Jack Killen, acting deputy director of the [[National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine]], says homeopathy "goes beyond current understanding of chemistry and physics". He adds: "There is, to my knowledge, no condition for which homeopathy has been proven to be an effective treatment."<ref name="Adler2" /> [[Ben Goldacre]] says that homeopaths who misrepresent scientific evidence to a [[Scientific literacy|scientifically illiterate]] public, have "... walled themselves off from academic medicine, and critique has been all too often met with avoidance rather than argument".<ref name="Goldacre20072">{{cite journal|last1=Goldacre|first1=Ben|year=2007|title=Benefits and risks of homoeopathy|journal=The Lancet|volume=370|issue=9600|pages=1672–73|doi=10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61706-1|pmid=18022024|s2cid=43588927}}</ref> Homeopaths often prefer to ignore [[Meta-analysis|meta-analyses]] in favour of [[Cherry picking (fallacy)|cherry picked]] positive results, such as by promoting a particular [[observational study]] (one which Goldacre describes as "little more than a customer-satisfaction survey") as if it were more informative than a series of randomized controlled trials.<ref name="Goldacre20072" /> |
|||
===Britain=== |
|||
In an article entitled "Should We Maintain an Open Mind about Homeopathy?"<ref name="Baum_&_Ernst2">{{cite journal|last1=Baum|first1=Michael|last2=Ernst|first2=Edzard|year=2009|title=Should We Maintain an Open Mind about Homeopathy?|journal=The American Journal of Medicine|volume=122|issue=11|pages=973–74|doi=10.1016/j.amjmed.2009.03.038|pmid=19854319|quote=Homeopathy is among the worst examples of faith-based medicine... These axioms [of homeopathy] are not only out of line with scientific facts but also directly opposed to them. If homeopathy is correct, much of physics, chemistry, and pharmacology must be incorrect... To have an open mind about homeopathy or similarly implausible forms of alternative medicine (e.g., Bach Flower remedies, spiritual healing, crystal therapy) is, therefore, not an option}}</ref> published in the ''[[American Journal of Medicine]]'', [[Michael Baum (surgeon)|Michael Baum]] and [[Edzard Ernst]]{{spaced ndash}}writing to other physicians{{spaced ndash}}wrote that "Homeopathy is among the worst examples of faith-based medicine... These axioms [of homeopathy] are not only out of line with scientific facts but also directly opposed to them. If homeopathy is correct, much of physics, chemistry, and pharmacology must be incorrect...". |
|||
Homeopathy was first established in [[Britain]] by Dr. Frederick Quin around 1827, although two Italian homeopathic doctors (Drs Romani and Roberta) had been employed two years previously by the Earl of Shrewsbury based at [[Alton Towers]] in [[Stoke-on-Trent|North Staffordshire]]. Homeopathy in Britian quickly became the preferred medical treatment of the upper classes<ref>Leary, B, Lorentzon M & Bosanquet, A, 1998, It Wont Do Any Harm: Practice & People At The London Homeopathic Hospital, 1889-1923, in Juette, Risse & Woodward, 1998 Juette, R, G Risse & J Woodward [Eds.], 1998, Culture, Knowledge And Healing: Historical Perspectives On Homeopathy In Europe And North America, Sheffield Univ. Press, UK, p.253</ref>, as well as the aristocracy<ref>Leary, et al, 1998, 254</ref> and retained an elite clientele, including members of the royal family.<ref>Sharma, Ursula, 1992, Complementary Medicine Today, Practitioners And Patients, Routledge, UK, p.185</ref> At its peak in the 1870s [[Britain]] had numerous homeopathic dispensaries and small hospitals as well as large busy hospitals in [[Liverpool]], [[Birmingham]]<ref> {{cite web|url=http://www.homeoint.org/photo/bat/hopangla.htm#2 |title=PHOTOTHÈQUE HOMÉOPATHIQUE |accessdate=2007-07-24 }}</ref>, [[Glasgow]], [[London]] and [[Bristol]]. The largest organisation of homeopaths in [[Britain]], the Society of Homeopaths, was founded in [[1978]] and the [[Faculty of Homeopathy]], which is based in London, has over 1,400 members and was incorporated by an [[Act of Parliament]] in [[1950]].<ref> {{cite web|url=http://www.trusthomeopathy.org/faculty/fac_over.html |title=The Royal Archives are based in the Round Tower at Windsor Castle |accessdate=2007-07-24 |publisher=British Homeopathic Association }}</ref> [[Charles, Prince of Wales]] is also an avid enthusiast of homeopathy and has inquired about the cost benefit of homeopathic therapies for the [[NHS]].<ref>{{cite news | first= | last= | coauthors= | title=Row over Charles' medicines study | date=[[2005-08-21]] | publisher=[[BBC News]] | url =http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/4179954.stm | work =BBC News | pages = | accessdate = 2007-07-25 | language = }}</ref> |
|||
=== Plausibility of dilutions === |
|||
===India=== |
|||
[[File:LedumPalustre15CH.jpg|right|thumb|A homeopathic preparation made from [[marsh tea]]: the "15C" dilution shown here means the original solution was diluted to 1/10<sup>30</sup> of its original strength.]] |
|||
The exceedingly low concentration of homeopathic preparations, which often lack even a single [[molecule]] of the diluted substance,<ref name="Ernst2005" /> has been the basis of questions about the effects of the preparations since the 19th century.<ref name="GrimesFACT">{{cite journal|last1=Grimes|first1=D.R.|year=2012|title=Proposed mechanisms for homeopathy are physically impossible|journal=Focus on Alternative and Complementary Therapies|volume=17|issue=3|pages=149–55|doi=10.1111/j.2042-7166.2012.01162.x}}</ref> The laws of chemistry give this dilution limit, which is related to the [[Avogadro constant|Avogadro number]], as being roughly equal to 12C homeopathic dilutions (1 part in 10<sup>24</sup>).<ref name="Appendix2" /><ref name="Sbarrett2">{{cite web|author=Barrett S|date=December 28, 2004|title=Homeopathy: the ultimate fake|url=http://www.quackwatch.org/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/homeo.html|access-date=July 25, 2007|publisher=[[Quackwatch]]}}</ref><ref name="dynam2">{{cite web|author=Faziola L|title=Dynamization and dilution|url=http://altmed.creighton.edu/Homeopathy/philosophy/dilution.htm|access-date=July 24, 2007|work=Homeopathy Tutorial|publisher=Creighton University School of Medicine|archive-date=August 26, 2002|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20020826082134/http://altmed.creighton.edu/Homeopathy/philosophy/dilution.htm}}</ref> [[James Randi]] and the [[10:23 campaign]] groups have highlighted the lack of [[active ingredient]]s by taking large 'overdoses'.<ref name="Jones2">Sam Jones, [https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2010/jan/29/sceptics-homeopathy-mass-overdose-boots "Homeopathy protesters to take 'mass overdose' outside Boots"], ''[[The Guardian]]'', January 29, 2010</ref> None of the hundreds of demonstrators in the UK, Australia, New Zealand, Canada and the US were injured and "no one was cured of anything, either".<ref name="Jones2" /> |
|||
Modern advocates of homeopathy have proposed a concept of "[[water memory]]", according to which water "remembers" the substances mixed in it, and transmits the effect of those substances when consumed. This concept is inconsistent with the current understanding of matter, and water memory has never been demonstrated to have any detectable effect, biological or otherwise.<ref name="NatureWhenToBelieve2">{{cite journal|author=Maddox J|year=1988|title=When to believe the unbelievable|journal=Nature|type=editorial|volume=333|issue=6176|pages=1349–56|bibcode=1988Natur.333Q.787.|doi=10.1038/333787a0|pmid=<!--none-->|s2cid=4369459|doi-access=free}}</ref><ref name="delusion2">{{cite journal|last1=Maddox|first1=J|last2=Randi|first2=J|last3=Stewart|first3=W|year=1988|title="High-dilution" experiments a delusion|journal=Nature|volume=334|issue=6180|pages=287–91|bibcode=1988Natur.334..287M|doi=10.1038/334287a0|pmid=2455869|s2cid=9579433}}</ref> Existence of a [[Biological activity|pharmacological effect]] in the absence of any true active ingredient is inconsistent with the [[law of mass action]] and the observed [[dose-response relationship]]s characteristic of therapeutic drugs.<ref name="Levy2">{{cite journal|last1=Levy|first1=G|year=1986|title=Kinetics of drug action: An overview|journal=Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology|volume=78|issue=4 Pt 2|pages=754–61|doi=10.1016/0091-6749(86)90057-6|pmid=3534056}}</ref> Homeopaths contend that their methods produce a therapeutically active preparation, selectively including only the intended substance, though in reality any water will have been in contact with millions of different substances throughout its history, and homeopaths cannot account for the selected homeopathic substance being isolated as a special case in their process.<ref name="Smith20122">{{cite journal|author=Smith K|year=2012|title=Homeopathy is Unscientific and Unethical|journal=Bioethics|volume=26|issue=9|pages=508–12|doi=10.1111/j.1467-8519.2011.01956.x|s2cid=143067523|url=https://zenodo.org/record/1035885 }}</ref> |
|||
Homeopathy arrived in [[India]] with Dr John Martin Honigberger in [[Lahore]], in 1829-1830<ref> {{cite web|url=http://www.hpathy.com/Status/homeopathy-India.asp |title=Homeopathy in India |accessdate=2007-07-24 |last=Bhatia |first=Manish }}</ref><ref>Jugal Kishore, About Entry of Homeopathy Into India, Bull. Ind. Hist. Med., vol. 3 (2), April 1973, pp.76-78; p.76</ref>. India has the largest homeopathic infrastructure in the world, with 300,000 practicing homeopaths, 180 colleges teaching courses, and 7500 government clinics and 307 hospitals which dispense homeopathic remedies.<ref>Dr. Raj Kumar Manchanda & Dr. Mukul Kulashreshtha, ''[http://www.delhihomeo.com/paperberlin.html Cost Effectiveness and Efficacy of Homeopathy in Primary Health Care Units of Government of Delhi- A study]''</ref> |
|||
Practitioners also hold that higher dilutions produce stronger medicinal effects. This idea is also inconsistent with observed dose-response relationships, where effects are dependent on the concentration of the active ingredient in the body.<ref name="Levy2" /> Some contend that the phenomenon of [[hormesis]] may support the idea of dilution increasing potency,<ref>{{cite journal|author1=Oberbaum, M|author2=Singer, SR|author3=Samuels, N.|date=Jul 2010|title=Hormesis and homeopathy: bridge over troubled waters|journal=Hum Exp Toxicol|volume=29|issue=7|pages=567–71|doi=10.1177/0960327110369777|pmid=20558608|s2cid=8107797|doi-access=free|bibcode=2010HETox..29..567O }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|last1=Khuda-Bukhsh|first1=Anisur Rahman|date=2003|title=Towards understanding molecular mechanisms of action of homeopathic drugs: an overview|journal=Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry|volume=253|issue=1/2|pages=339–45|doi=10.1023/A:1026048907739|pmid=14619985|s2cid=10971539}}</ref> but the dose-response relationship outside the zone of hormesis declines with dilution as normal, and nonlinear pharmacological effects do not provide any credible support for homeopathy.<ref name="Smith20122" /> |
|||
===United States=== |
|||
===Efficacy=== |
|||
Homeopathy was first established in the [[USA]] by Dr Hans Burch Gram <ref>[http://nccam.nih.gov/health/homeopathy/ ''Questions and Answers About Homeopathy'' NCCAM, National Institutes of Health]</ref> in 1825 and rapidly gained popularity, partly because the inherent dangers of conventional medicine were extreme there and partly due to the efforts of Dr. Constantine Hering who in 1833 immigrated to America, and later became known as the "father of American homeopathy".<ref>Frederick Karst, Homeopathy In Illinois, Caduceus, 4:2, 1988, pp.1-33; p.5</ref> The height of it's influence was the end of the 19th century where hardly any city with over 50,000 people was without a homeopathic hospital. In 1890 there was 93 regular schools, 14 of them were fully homeopathic and 8 of them were [[eclectic]] and in 1900 there were 121 regular schools and 22 of them were homeopathic and 10 eclectic.<ref>Charles S Cameron, Homeopathy in Retrospect, Trans. Stud. Coll. Phys. Philadelp., 27, 1959, 28-33; p.30</ref> |
|||
{| class="wikitable floatright" style="width:40%;" |
|||
|+ Explanations for efficacy of homeopathic preparations:<ref name="Shelton" />{{rp|155–167|date=November 2012}}<ref name="BrienRheumatology">{{cite journal |url= |title=Homeopathy has clinical benefits in rheumatoid arthritis patients that are attributable to the consultation process but not the homeopathic remedy: a randomized controlled clinical trial |author1=Brien S |author2=Lachance S |author3=Prescott P |author4=McDermott C |author5=Lewith G |journal=Rheumatology |date=June 2011 |volume=50 |issue=6 |pages=1070–82 |doi=10.1093/rheumatology/keq234 |pmid=21076131 |pmc=3093927}}</ref> |
|||
|- |
|||
| The [[placebo effect]] |
|||
| The intensive consultation process and expectations for the homeopathic preparations may cause the effect |
|||
|- |
|||
| Therapeutic effect of the consultation |
|||
| The care, concern, and reassurance a patient experiences when opening up to a compassionate caregiver can have a positive effect on the patient's well-being. |
|||
|- |
|||
| Unassisted [[healing|natural healing]] |
|||
| Time and the body's ability to heal without assistance can eliminate many diseases of their own accord. |
|||
|- |
|||
| Unrecognized treatments |
|||
| An unrelated food, exercise, environmental agent, or treatment for a different ailment, may have occurred. |
|||
|- |
|||
| [[Regression toward the mean|Regression towards the mean]] |
|||
| Since many diseases or conditions are cyclical, symptoms vary over time and patients tend to seek care when discomfort is greatest; they may feel better anyway but because of the timing of the visit to the homeopath they attribute improvement to the preparation taken. |
|||
|- |
|||
| Non-homeopathic treatment |
|||
| Patients may also receive standard medical care at the same time as homeopathic treatment, and the former is responsible for improvement. |
|||
|- |
|||
| Cessation of unpleasant treatment |
|||
| Often homeopaths recommend patients stop getting medical treatment such as surgery or drugs, which can cause unpleasant side-effects; improvements are attributed to homeopathy when the actual cause is the cessation of the treatment causing side-effects in the first place, but the underlying disease remains untreated and still dangerous to the patient. |
|||
|} |
|||
No individual homeopathic preparation has been unambiguously shown by research to be different from placebo.<ref name="pmid124926032" /> The [[Methodology|methodological]] quality of the early primary research was low, with problems such as weaknesses in [[study design]] and reporting, small [[sample size]], and [[selection bias]]. Since better quality trials have become available, the evidence for efficacy of homeopathy preparations has diminished; the highest-quality trials indicate that the preparations themselves exert no intrinsic effect.<ref name="Caulfield20053" /><ref name="Shelton2">{{cite book|last=Shelton|first=JW|url=https://archive.org/details/homeopathyhowitr0000shel|title=Homeopathy: How it really works|publisher=[[Prometheus Books]]|year=2004|isbn=978-1-59102-109-4|location=Amherst, New York|url-access=registration}}</ref>{{rp|206|date=November 2012}}<ref name="Linde19992">{{cite journal|last1=Linde|first1=K|last2=Scholz|first2=M|last3=Ramirez|first3=G|last4=Clausius|first4=N|last5=Melchart|first5=D|last6=Jonas|first6=WB|year=1999|title=Impact of study quality on outcome in placebo-controlled trials of homeopathy|journal=Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|volume=52|issue=7|pages=631–36|doi=10.1016/S0895-4356(99)00048-7|pmid=10391656}}</ref> A review conducted in 2010 of all the pertinent studies of "best evidence" produced by the [[Cochrane Collaboration]] concluded that this evidence "fails to demonstrate that homeopathic medicines have effects beyond placebo."<ref name="Ernst20102" /> |
|||
==Criticism== |
|||
Homeopathy has been criticized by those in the scientific community since it's inception. The extreme dilutions used in homeopathic preparations, which would often leave no [[molecule]]s of the original substance, is inconsistent with with the laws of [[chemistry]] and physics as well as the observed [[Dose-response relationship|dose-response relationships]] of conventional drugs. Critics contend that any positive results obtained from homeopathic remedies are purely due to the [[placebo]] effect, where the patients subjective improvement of symptoms is based solely on the power of suggestion, due to the individual expecting or believing that it will work. Critics cite the lack of viable scientific studies for the effectiveness of homeopathic remedies as evidence that they are not effective and that any alleged positive effects are due to the placebo effect. Critics also contend that homeopathy is inherently dangerous, because homeopaths offer a false hope to patients who could be getting proper treatment by a conventional medical doctor. |
|||
In 2009, the United Kingdom's [[House of Commons of the United Kingdom|House of Commons]] Science and Technology Committee concluded that there was no compelling evidence of effect other than placebo.<ref name="inquiry_cfm">UK Parliamentary Committee Science and Technology Committee. [http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/science-and-technology-committee/inquiries/homeopathy-/ "Evidence Check 2: Homeopathy"]</ref> The Australian [[National Health and Medical Research Council]] completed a comprehensive review of the effectiveness of homeopathic preparations in 2015, in which it concluded that "there were no health conditions for which there was reliable evidence that homeopathy was effective."<ref name="NHMRC2">{{cite book|author1=National Health and Medical Research Council|url=https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/guidelines-publications/cam02|title=NHMRC statement on homeopathy and NHMRC information paper – Evidence on the effectiveness of homeopathy for treating health conditions|date=2015|publisher=National Health and Medical Research Council|isbn=978-1-925129-29-8|location=Canberra|page=16|quote=There is no reliable evidence that homoeopathy is effective for treating health conditions.|author1-link=National Health and Medical Research Council|access-date=August 18, 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170419065845/https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/guidelines-publications/cam02|archive-date=April 19, 2017|df=mdy-all}}</ref> The European Academies' Science Advisory Council (EASAC) published its official analysis in 2017 finding a lack of evidence that homeopathic products are effective, and raising concerns about quality control.<ref name="EASAC2017">{{cite web|date=September 2017|title=Homeopathic products and practices: assessing the evidence and ensuring consistency in regulating medical claims in the EU|url=http://www.easac.eu/fileadmin/PDF_s/reports_statements/EASAC_Homepathy_statement_web_final.pdf|access-date=1 October 2017|work=European Academies' Science Advisory Council|page=1|quote=... we agree with previous extensive evaluations concluding that there are no known diseases for which there is robust, reproducible evidence that homeopathy is effective beyond the placebo effect.}}</ref> In contrast a 2011 book was published, purportedly financed by the Swiss government, that concluded that homeopathy was effective and cost efficient.<ref>{{Cite book|last1=Bonhöft|first1=Gudrun|title=Homeopathy in healthcare: effectiveness, appropriateness, safety, costs.|last2=Matthiessen|first2=Peter|publisher=Springer|year=2012}}</ref> Although hailed by proponents as proof that homeopathy works,<ref name="ShawMisconduct2">{{cite journal|author=Shaw, David|date=May 2012|title=The Swiss report on homeopathy: a case study of research misconduct|journal=[[Swiss Medical Weekly]]|volume=142|pages=w13594|doi=10.4414/smw.2012.13594|pmid=22653406|doi-access=free}}</ref> it was found to be scientifically, logically and ethically flawed, with most authors having a [[conflict of interest]].<ref name="ShawMisconduct2" /> The [[Swiss Federal Office of Public Health]] later released a statement saying the book was published without the consent of the Swiss government.<ref>{{cite journal|author=Gurtner, Felix|date=December 2012|title=The report "Homeopathy in healthcare: effectiveness, appropriateness, safety, costs" is not a "Swiss report"|journal=[[Swiss Medical Weekly]]|volume=142|pages=w13723|doi=10.4414/smw.2012.13723|pmid=23255156|doi-access=free}}</ref> |
|||
===Criticism of high dilutions=== |
|||
[[Meta-analysis|Meta-analyses]], essential tools to summarize evidence of therapeutic efficacy,<ref name="PRISMA2">{{cite journal|last1=Liberati|first1=A|last2=Altman|first2=DG|last3=Tetzlaff|first3=J|last4=Mulrow|first4=C|last5=Gøtzsche|first5=PC|last6=Ioannidis|first6=J PA|last7=Clarke|first7=M|last8=Devereaux|first8=PJ|last9=Kleijnen|first9=J|last10=Moher|first10=D|year=2009|title=The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration|journal=PLOS Medicine|volume=6|issue=7|pages=e1000100|doi=10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100|pmc=2707010|pmid=19621070|doi-access=free}}</ref> and [[systematic review]]s have found that the methodological quality in the majority of randomized trials in homeopathy have shortcomings and that such trials were generally of lower quality than trials of conventional medicine.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Jonas|first1=WB|last2=Anderson|first2=RL|last3=Crawford|first3=CC|last4=Lyons|first4=JS|date=2001|title=A systematic review of the quality of homeopathic clinical trials|journal=BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine|volume=1|page=12|doi=10.1186/1472-6882-1-12|pmc=64638|pmid=11801202 |doi-access=free }}</ref><ref name="pmid114160762">{{cite journal|last1=Linde|first1=K|last2=Jonas|first2=WB|last3=Melchart|first3=D|last4=Willich|first4=S|year=2001|title=The methodological quality of randomized controlled trials of homeopathy, herbal medicines and acupuncture|journal=International Journal of Epidemiology|volume=30|issue=3|pages=526–31|doi=10.1093/ije/30.3.526|pmid=11416076|author-link1=Klaus Linde|doi-access=free}}</ref> A major issue has been [[publication bias]], where positive results are more likely to be published in journals.<ref>{{cite journal|author=Jeffrey D. Scargle|year=2000|title=Publication Bias: The "file-drawer problem" in scientific inference|url=http://www.scientificexploration.org/journal/jse_14_1_scargle.pdf|journal=[[Journal of Scientific Exploration]]|volume=14|issue=2|pages=94–106|arxiv=physics/9909033|bibcode=1999physics...9033S|access-date=January 19, 2011|archive-date=January 22, 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150122021757/http://scientificexploration.org/journal/jse_14_1_scargle.pdf}}</ref>{{unreliable source?|date=February 2020}}<ref name="pmid160607222">{{cite journal|last1=Ioannidis|first1=John P. A.|year=2005|title=Why most published research findings are false|journal=PLOS Medicine|volume=2|issue=8|pages=e124|doi=10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124|pmc=1182327|pmid=16060722 |doi-access=free }}</ref><ref name="pmid18258002">{{cite journal|last1=Kleijnen|first1=J|last2=Knipschild|first2=P|last3=Ter Riet|first3=G|year=1991|title=Clinical trials of homoeopathy|journal=BMJ|volume=302|issue=6772|pages=316–23|doi=10.1136/bmj.302.6772.316|pmc=1668980|pmid=1825800}}</ref> This has been particularly marked in alternative medicine journals, where few of the published articles (just 5% during the year 2000) tend to report [[null result]]s.<ref name="Goldacre20072" /> A systematic review of the available systematic reviews confirmed in 2002 that higher-quality trials tended to have less positive results, and found no convincing evidence that any homeopathic preparation exerts clinical effects different from placebo.<ref name="pmid124926032" /> The same conclusion was also reached in 2005 in a meta-analysis published in ''The Lancet''. A 2017 systematic review and meta-analysis found that the most reliable evidence did not support the effectiveness of non-individualized homeopathy.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Mathie|first1=Robert T.|last2=Ramparsad|first2=Nitish|last3=Legg|first3=Lynn A.|last4=Clausen|first4=Jürgen|last5=Moss|first5=Sian|last6=Davidson|first6=Jonathan R. T.|last7=Messow|first7=Claudia-Martina|last8=McConnachie|first8=Alex|date=March 24, 2017|title=Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of non-individualised homeopathic treatment: systematic review and meta-analysis|journal=Systematic Reviews|volume=6|issue=1|page=63|doi=10.1186/s13643-017-0445-3|issn=2046-4053|pmc=5366148|pmid=28340607 |doi-access=free }}</ref> |
|||
The extremely high dilutions in homeopathy have been a main point of criticism. Homeopathy often dilutes remedies to the point there are no molecules from the original substance left in the final remedy, leading many critics to conclude that any effect that might have been present from the original substance is no longer in existence. Homeopathy contends that the higher the dilution (lower dose) actually equates to stronger effects of the medicine. This is inconsistent with modern sciences observations of [[Dose-response relationship|dose-response relationships]] that has been demonstrated by pharmacologists.<ref> {{cite web|url=http://www.quackwatch.org/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/homeo.html |title=Homeopathy: The Ultimate Fake |accessdate=2007-07-25 |last=Barrett |first=Stephen |date=2004-12-28 |work=National Institutes of Health |publisher=[[NCCAM]] }}</ref> According to the dose response relationship in modern medicine, smaller doses of chemicals produce smaller effects and larger doses produce larger effects generally. This has been confirmed in thousands of experiments on organisms as diverse as nematodes,<ref>Boyd WA, Williams PL. "Comparison of the sensitivity of three nematode species to copper and their utility in aquatic and soil toxicity tests." ''Environ Toxicol Chem.'' 2003 Nov;22(11):2768-74</ref> rats<ref>Goldoni M, Vettori MV, Alinovi R, Caglieri A, Ceccatelli S, Mutti A. "Models of neurotoxicity: extrapolation of benchmark doses ''in vitro''." ''Risk Anal.'' 2003 Jun;23(3):505-14.</ref> and humans.<ref>Yu HS, Liao WT, Chai CY. "Arsenic Carcinogenesis in the Skin." ''J Biomed Sci.'' 2006 Jun 29;</ref> Critiques of the high dilutions in homeopathy date back to the early 19th century. [[John Forbes (physician)|Sir John Forbes]], physician to [[Queen Victoria]], said the extremely small doses of homeopathy were regularly derided as useless, laughably ridiculous and "an outrage to human reason."<ref>Sir John Forbes, ''Homeopathy, Allopathy and Young Physic'', London, 1846</ref> Professor Sir [[James Young Simpson]] said of the highly diluted drugs: "no poison, however strong or powerful, the billionth or decillionth of which would in the least degree affect a man or harm a fly."<ref>James Y Simpson, ''Homoeopathy, Its Tenets and Tendencies, Theoretical, Theological and Therapeutical'', Edinburgh: Sutherland & Knox, 1853, 11</ref>. Nineteenth century American physician and author [[Oliver Wendell Holmes, Sr.]] was a also a vocal critic of homeopathy and published an essay in 1842 entitled ''Homeopathy and Its Kindred Delusions''.<ref> {{cite web|url=http://www.quackwatch.org/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/holmes.html |title=Homeopathy and Its Kindred Delusions |accessdate=2007-07-25 |last=Holmes |first=Oliver Wendell |work=Quackwatch }}</ref> |
|||
Health organizations, including the UK's [[National Health Service]],<ref name="nhs_choices2">{{cite web|title=Health A-Z -- Homeopathy|url=http://www.nhs.uk/conditions/Homeopathy/Pages/Introduction.aspx|access-date=April 22, 2013|publisher=National Health Service}}</ref> the [[American Medical Association]],<ref name="amapseudo2">{{cite web|author=AMA Council on Scientific Affairs|year=1997|title=Alternative medicine: Report 12 of the Council on Scientific Affairs (A–97)|url=http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/no-index/about-ama/13638.shtml|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090614085504/http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/no-index/about-ama/13638.shtml|archive-date=June 14, 2009|access-date=March 25, 2009|publisher=[[American Medical Association]]}}</ref> the [[FASEB]],<ref name="Weissmann2">{{cite journal|last1=Weissmann|first1=G|year=2006|title=Homeopathy: Holmes, Hogwarts, and the Prince of Wales|journal=The FASEB Journal|volume=20|issue=11|pages=1755–58|doi=10.1096/fj.06-0901ufm|pmid=16940145|s2cid=9305843|doi-access=free}}</ref> and the [[National Health and Medical Research Council]] of Australia,<ref name="NHMRC2" /> have issued statements saying that there is no good-quality evidence that homeopathy is effective as a treatment for any health condition.<ref name="nhs_choices2" /> In 2009, [[World Health Organization]] official [[Mario Raviglione]] criticized the use of homeopathy to treat [[tuberculosis]]; similarly, another WHO spokesperson argued there was no evidence homeopathy would be an effective treatment for [[Diarrhea|diarrhoea]].<ref>{{cite news|date=August 20, 2009|title=Homeopathy not a cure, says WHO|work=BBC News|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/8211925.stm|access-date=October 20, 2014}}</ref> They warned against the use of homeopathy for serious conditions such as [[Major depressive disorder|depression]], [[HIV/AIDS|HIV]] and [[malaria]].<ref>{{cite journal|last=Mashta|first=O|date=August 24, 2009|title=WHO warns against using homoeopathy to treat serious diseases|journal=BMJ|volume=339|issue=aug24 2|pages=b3447|doi=10.1136/bmj.b3447|pmid=19703929|s2cid=9303173}}</ref> The [[American College of Medical Toxicology]] and the [[American Academy of Clinical Toxicology]] recommend that no one use homeopathic treatment for disease or as a preventive health measure.<ref name="toxicfive2">{{cite web|author1=American College of Medical Toxicology|author1-link=American College of Medical Toxicology|author2=American Academy of Clinical Toxicology|author2-link=American Academy of Clinical Toxicology|date=February 2013|title=Five things physicians and patients should question|url=http://www.choosingwisely.org/doctor-patient-lists/american-college-of-medical-toxicology-and-the-american-academy-of-clinical-toxicology/|access-date=December 5, 2013|work=[[Choosing Wisely]]: an initiative of the [[ABIM Foundation]]|publisher=American College of Medical Toxicology and American Academy of Clinical Toxicology}}, which cites {{cite journal|last1=Woodward|first1=KN|date=May 2005|title=The potential impact of the use of homeopathic and herbal remedies on monitoring the safety of prescription products|journal=Human & Experimental Toxicology|volume=24|issue=5|pages=219–33|doi=10.1191/0960327105ht529oa|pmid=16004184|bibcode=2005HETox..24..219W |s2cid=34767417}}</ref> These organizations report that no evidence exists that homeopathic treatment is effective, but that there is evidence that using these treatments produces harm and can bring indirect health risks by delaying conventional treatment.<ref name="toxicfive2" /> |
|||
Homeopaths believe that after vigorous shaking, water retains a memory of a substance that once existed in it, even if the substance is no longer present. Critics respond that water will have been in contact with millions of different substances in its history. According to this molecular paradigm, any glass of water must be regarded as an extreme dilution of almost any agent you care to mention. Thus, critics argue that by drinking water one receives homeopathic treatment for every imaginable condition.<ref>{{cite web | title=Horizon's Homeopathic Coup, Cuzco's Altitude, More Funny Sites, The Clangers, Overdue, Orbito Nabbed in Padua, Randi A Zombie?, Stellar Guests at Amazing Meeting, and Great New Shermer Books! | work=Swift, Online Newsletter of the JREF, November 29, 2002, James Randi Educational Foundation | url=http://www.randi.org/jr/112902.html | accessdate=2006-09-20}}</ref><ref>{{cite web | title=HOMEOPATHY AND SCIENCE: A CLOSER LOOK | work=David W. Ramey, Mahlon Wagner, Robert H. Imrie, Victor Stenger, The Technology Journal of the Franklin Institute | url=http://www.colorado.edu/philosophy/vstenger/Medicine/Homeop.html | accessdate=2006-09-20}}</ref> Critics assert that proponents of homeopathy are unable to accept the molecular paradigm as a complete account of life phenomena and therapeutics. They believe that the methodical dilution of a particular substance, beginning with a 10% or lower solution and working downwards, with shaking after each dilution, produces a therapeutically active 'remedy', in contrast to regular water which is therapeutically inert. However, chemically, a dilution of anything at 30C is identical to water. |
|||
===Purported effects in other biological systems=== |
|||
===Medical efficacy=== |
|||
While some articles have suggested that homeopathic solutions of high dilution can have statistically significant effects on organic processes including the growth of [[grain]]<ref>{{cite book |
|||
|author =Kolisko L |
|||
|trans-title =Physiological and physical evidence of the effectiveness of the smallest entities |title=Physiologischer und physikalischer Nachweis der Wirksamkeit kleinster Entitäten |
|||
|language =de |
|||
|location =Stuttgart |
|||
|year =1959 |
|||
}}</ref> and [[enzyme|enzyme reactions]], such evidence is disputed since attempts to replicate them have failed.<ref name="pmid11316508">{{cite journal |last1=Walach |first1=H |last2=Köster |first2=H |last3=Hennig |first3=T |last4=Haag |first4=G |title=The effects of homeopathic belladonna 30CH in healthy volunteers – a randomized, double-blind experiment |journal=Journal of Psychosomatic Research |volume=50 |issue=3 |pages=155–60 |year=2001 |pmid=11316508 |doi=10.1016/S0022-3999(00)00224-5}}</ref><ref name="pmid8255290">{{cite journal |last1=Hirst |first1=SJ |last2=Hayes |first2=NA |last3=Burridge |first3=J |last4=Pearce |first4=FL |last5=Foreman |first5=JC |title=Human basophil degranulation is not triggered by very dilute antiserum against human IgE |journal=Nature |volume=366 |issue=6455 |pages=525–27 |year=1993 |pmid=8255290 |doi=10.1038/366525a0|bibcode=1993Natur.366..525H |s2cid=4314547 }}</ref><ref name="pmid1376282">{{cite journal |last1=Ovelgönne |first1=J. H. |last2=Bol |first2=AWJM |last3=Hop |first3=WCJ |last4=Wijk |first4=R |title=Mechanical agitation of very dilute antiserum against IgE has no effect on basophil staining properties |journal=Experientia |volume=48 |issue=5 |pages=504–08 |year=1992 |pmid=1376282 |doi=10.1007/BF01928175|s2cid=32110713 }}</ref><ref name="pmid16722785">{{cite journal |last1=Witt |first1=Claudia M |last2=Bluth |first2=M |last3=Hinderlich |first3=S |last4=Albrecht |first4=H |last5=Ludtke |first5=R |last6=Weisshuhn |first6=Thorolf ER |last7=Willich |first7=Stefan N |title=Does potentized HgCl<sub>2</sub> (mercurius corrosivus) affect the activity of diastase and amylase? |journal=Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine |volume=12 |pages=359–65 |year=2006 |doi=10.1089/acm.2006.12.359 |pmid=16722785 |issue=4}}</ref><ref name="pmid16036166">{{cite journal |last1=Guggisberg |first1=A |last2=Baumgartner |first2=S |last3=Tschopp |first3=C |last4=Heusser |first4=P |title=Replication study concerning the effects of homeopathic dilutions of histamine on human basophil degranulation in vitro |journal=Complementary Therapies in Medicine |volume=13 |issue=2 |pages=91–100 |year=2005 |pmid=16036166 |doi=10.1016/j.ctim.2005.04.003}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|last1=Vickers|first1=AJ|title=Independent replication of pre-clinical research in homeopathy: a systematic review.|journal=Forschende Komplementärmedizin|date=December 1999|volume=6|issue=6|pages=311–20|doi=10.1159/000021286|pmid=10649002|s2cid=22051466}}</ref> In 2001 and 2004, [[Madeleine Ennis]] published a number of studies that reported that homeopathic dilutions of [[histamine]] exerted an effect on the activity of [[basophil]]s.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Brown|first1=V|last2=Ennis|first2=M|date=April 2001|title=Flow-cytometric analysis of basophil activation: inhibition by histamine at conventional and homeopathic concentrations|journal=Inflammation Research|volume=50|issue=Suppl 2|pages=S47–48|doi=10.1007/PL00022402|pmid=11411598|s2cid=10880180}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|last1=Cumps|first1=J.|last2=Ennis|first2=M.|last3=Mannaioni|first3=P. F.|last4=Roberfroid|first4=M.|last5=Sainte-Laudy|first5=J.|last6=Wiegant|first6=F.A.C.|last7=Belon|first7=P.|date=April 1, 2004|title=Histamine dilutions modulate basophil activation|journal=Inflammation Research|volume=53|issue=5|pages=181–88|doi=10.1007/s00011-003-1242-0|pmid=15105967|s2cid=8682416}}</ref> In response to the first of these studies, ''[[Horizon (BBC TV series)|Horizon]]'' aired a programme in which British scientists attempted to replicate Ennis' results; they were unable to do so.<ref>{{cite web|title=Homeopathy: The Test|url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/science/horizon/2002/homeopathytrans.shtml|access-date=April 29, 2015|publisher=BBC}}</ref> A 2007 systematic review of high-dilution experiments found that none of the experiments with positive results could be reproduced by all investigators.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Witt|first1=CM|last2=Bluth|first2=M|last3=Albrecht|first3=H|last4=Weisshuhn|first4=TE|last5=Baumgartner|first5=S|last6=Willich|first6=SN|title=The in vitro evidence for an effect of high homeopathic potencies--a systematic review of the literature|journal=Complementary Therapies in Medicine|date=June 2007|volume=15|issue=2|pages=128–38|pmid=17544864|doi=10.1016/j.ctim.2007.01.011}}</ref> |
|||
In 1988, French immunologist [[Jacques Benveniste]] published a paper in the journal ''[[Nature (journal)|Nature]]'' while working at [[INSERM]].<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Davenas|first1=E.|last2=Beauvais|first2=F.|last3=Amara|first3=J.|last4=Oberbaum|first4=M.|last5=Robinzon|first5=B.|last6=Miadonnai|first6=A.|last7=Tedeschi|first7=A.|last8=Pomeranz|first8=B.|last9=Fortner|first9=P.|last10=Belon|first10=P.|last11=Sainte-Laudy|first11=J.|date=1988|title=Human basophil degranulation triggered by very dilute antiserum against IgE|url=http://www.nature.com/articles/333816a0|journal=Nature|language=en|volume=333|issue=6176|pages=816–818|doi=10.1038/333816a0|pmid=2455231|bibcode=1988Natur.333..816D|s2cid=12992106|issn=0028-0836}}</ref> The paper purported to have discovered that basophils released histamine when exposed to a homeopathic dilution of anti-immunoglobulin E antibody. Skeptical of the findings, ''Nature'' assembled an independent investigative team to determine the accuracy of the research. After investigation the team found that the experiments were "statistically ill-controlled", "interpretation has been clouded by the exclusion of measurements in conflict with the claim", and concluded, "We believe that experimental data have been uncritically assessed and their imperfections inadequately reported."<ref name="delusion"> |
|||
Homeopathy is considered to have paved the way for modern medical practices including experiments to determine value of medical remedies such as quantitative procedures and the use of statistics. Early scientists including Joseph Lister and Sidney Ringer stated that they were led by homeopathy to important pharmacological discoveries.<ref name=Ramey> {{cite web|url=http://www.colorado.edu/philosophy/vstenger/Medicine/Homeop.html |title=HOMEOPATHY AND SCIENCE: A CLOSER LOOK |accessdate=2007-07-25 |last=Ramey |first=David W. |coauthors=Mahlon Wagner, Robert H. Imrie, Victor Stenger. |publisher=The Technology Journal of the Franklin Institute }}</ref> However despite the fact that some of the procedures in homeopathy were ahead of their time, the medical effectiveness of homeopathy has been a point of contention since it's inception. Early trials testing the efficiency of homeopathic treatments conducted by Haheneman himself were likely to lack the scientific rigor of modern scientific studies and the first modern studies investigating the effectiveness of homeopathy date back to 1906.<ref> {{cite journal|title=The test drug-proving of the O O and L Society. A reproving of belladonna.|journal=O O & L Society|date=1906|first=HP|last=Bellows|coauthors=|volume=|issue=|pages=|id= |url=|format=|accessdate=2007-07-25}}</ref> During the 1940's the British government tested the efficacy of homeopathy on soldiers during ww2 to determine whether troops using homeopathic treatments healed faster than those using placebo. Those using homeopathic remedies did exhibit increased healing patterns, however the methods of the studies have been questioned.<ref> {{cite web|url=http://www.jameslindlibrary.org/trial_records/20th_Century/1940s/brit_homeo_soc/brit_homeo_soc_commentary.html |title=The homeopathic mustard gas trials of |accessdate=2007-07-25 |last=Dean |first=Michael |work=Department of Health Sciences }}</ref> |
|||
{{cite journal |last1=Maddox |first1=J |last2=Randi |first2=J |last3=Stewart |first3=W |title="High-dilution" experiments a delusion |journal=Nature |volume=334 |issue=6180 |pages=287–91 |year=1988 |pmid=2455869 |doi=10.1038/334287a0 |bibcode=1988Natur.334..287M |s2cid=9579433 }}</ref><ref name="Sullivan 1988-07-27"> |
|||
{{cite news |
|||
|author =Sullivan W |
|||
|title =Water that has a memory? Skeptics win second round |
|||
|date =July 27, 1988 |
|||
|work =[[The New York Times]] |
|||
|url =https://www.nytimes.com/1988/07/27/us/water-that-has-a-memory-skeptics-win-second-round.html |
|||
|access-date =October 3, 2007 |
|||
|author-link =Walter S. Sullivan |
|||
}}</ref><ref>Benveniste defended his results by comparing the inquiry to the Salem witch hunts and asserting that "It may be that all of us are wrong in good faith. This is no crime but science as usual and only the future knows."</ref> |
|||
== Ethics and safety == |
|||
More recent and controlled clinical trials done on homeopathy have shown mixed results, where some show no difference between homeopathic remedies and placebo while others show a slight difference. <ref> {{cite web|url=http://nccam.nih.gov/health/homeopathy/#q8entury/1940s/brit_homeo_soc/brit_homeo_soc_commentary.html |title=Questions and Answers About Homeopathy |accessdate=2007-07-25 |work=National Institutes of Health |publisher=[[NCCAM]] }}</ref> Systematic reviews and meta-analysis which analyze large groups of studies and draw conclusions based on the results as a whole have been used to determine the effectiveness of homeopathy. Early meta-analyzes investigating homeopathic remedies have shown slightly positive results among the studies examined, however such studies have warned that it was impossible to draw conclusions due to low methodological quality and the unknown role of publication bias in the studies reviewed.<ref name="pmid1825800">{{cite journal |
|||
[[File:Rhustox.jpg|thumb|Homeopathic preparation ''Rhus toxicodendron'', derived from [[Toxicodendron radicans|poison ivy]]]]The provision of homeopathic preparations has been described as unethical.<ref name="unethical">{{cite journal |last1=Shaw |first1=DM |title=Homeopathy is where the harm is: Five unethical effects of funding unscientific 'remedies' |journal=Journal of Medical Ethics |volume=36 |issue=3 |pages=130–31 |year=2010 |pmid=20211989 |doi=10.1136/jme.2009.034959 |s2cid=206996446 |doi-access=free }}</ref><ref name="Shaw2010">{{cite journal |last=Shaw |first=David |title=Homeopathy and medical ethics |journal=Focus on Alternative and Complementary Therapies |publisher=Wiley |volume=16 |issue=1 |date=4 November 2010 |issn=1465-3753 |doi=10.1111/j.2042-7166.2010.01051.x |pages=17–21}}</ref> [[Michael Baum (surgeon)|Michael Baum]], professor emeritus of surgery and visiting professor of medical humanities at [[University College London]] (UCL), has described homeopathy as a "cruel deception".<ref name="Janes">{{cite news |author=Hilly Janes |url=http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/article4682309.ece |title=The Lifestyle 50: The top fifty people who influence the way we eat, exercise and think about ourselves |work=[[The Times]] |date=September 6, 2008 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110727183929/http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/article4682309.ece |archive-date=July 27, 2011}}</ref> [[Edzard Ernst]], the first professor of [[alternative medicine|complementary medicine]] in the United Kingdom and a former homeopathic practitioner,<ref name="Ernst_memo">[https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200910/cmselect/cmsctech/memo/homeopathy/ucm1602.htm Memorandum submitted by Edzard Ernst HO 16] to the [[House of Lords]]</ref><ref> |
|||
|author=Kleijnen J, Knipschild P, ter Riet G |
|||
{{cite news |
|||
|title=Clinical trials of homoeopathy |
|||
|title=The alternative professor |
|||
|journal=BMJ |
|||
|url=https://www.theguardian.com/science/2003/sep/25/scienceinterviews.health |
|||
|volume=302 |
|||
|author=Boseley S |
|||
|issue=6772 |
|||
|newspaper=[[The Guardian]] |
|||
|pages=316-23 |
|||
|date=July 21, 2008 |
|||
|year=1991 |
|||
|location=London |
|||
|pmid=1825800 |
|||
}}</ref><ref name="Con?">{{cite news |
|||
|doi= |
|||
|url=https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-wellbeing/features/complementary-therapies-the-big-con-813248.html |
|||
|issn= |
|||
|title=Complementary therapies: The big con? |
|||
}}</ref> Recent meta-analysis of clinical trials on the effectiveness of homeopathy have shown that earlier clinical trials have shown signs of major weakness in methodology and reporting and that homeopathy trials were less randomized and reported less on dropouts than other types of trials.<ref name="pmid11416076">{{cite journal |
|||
|work=The Independent |
|||
|author=Linde K, Jonas WB, Melchart D, Willich S |
|||
|access-date=May 4, 2010 |
|||
|title=The methodological quality of randomized controlled trials of homeopathy, herbal medicines and acupuncture |
|||
|location=London |
|||
|journal=International journal of epidemiology |
|||
|date=April 22, 2008 |
|||
|volume=30 |
|||
|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090427070400/http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-wellbeing/features/complementary-therapies-the-big-con-813248.html |
|||
|issue=3 |
|||
|archive-date=April 27, 2009 |
|||
|pages=526-31 |
|||
}}</ref> has expressed his concerns about [[pharmacist]]s who violate their ethical code by failing to provide customers with "necessary and relevant information" about the true nature of the homeopathic products they advertise and sell.<ref> |
|||
|year=2001 |
|||
{{cite news |
|||
|pmid=11416076 |
|||
|title=Pharmacists urged to 'tell the truth' about homeopathic remedies |
|||
|doi= |
|||
|url=https://www.theguardian.com/science/2008/jul/21/pharmacists.homeophathy |
|||
|issn= |
|||
|author=Sample I |
|||
}}</ref> |
|||
|newspaper=[[The Guardian]] |
|||
|date=July 21, 2008 |
|||
|location=London |
|||
}}</ref> In 2013 the [[Advertising Standards Authority (United Kingdom)|UK Advertising Standards Authority]] concluded that the [[Society of Homeopaths]] were targeting vulnerable ill people and discouraging the use of essential medical treatment while making misleading claims of efficacy for homeopathic products.<ref name="ASA">{{cite web|date=July 3, 2013|title=ASA adjudication on Society of Homeopaths|url=http://www.asa.org.uk/Rulings/Adjudications/2013/7/Society-of-Homeopaths/SHP_ADJ_157043.aspx|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130706020223/http://asa.org.uk/Rulings/Adjudications/2013/7/Society-of-Homeopaths/SHP_ADJ_157043.aspx|archive-date=July 6, 2013|access-date=July 4, 2013|publisher=ASA|df=mdy-all}}</ref> In 2015 the [[Federal Court of Australia]] imposed penalties on a homeopathic company for making false or misleading statements about the efficacy of the whooping cough vaccine and recommending homeopathic remedies as an alternative.<ref name="ACCC">{{cite web|title=Court imposes penalty for false or misleading claims by Homeopathy Plus and Ms Frances Sheffield |url=https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/court-imposes-penalty-for-false-or-misleading-claims-by-homeopathy-plus-and-ms-frances-sheffield|publisher=ACCC|access-date=March 31, 2016|date=October 14, 2015}}</ref>[[File:1belladonna.jpg|thumb|Old homeopathic [[Deadly nightshade|belladonna]] preparation|alt=|left]]A 2000 review by homeopaths reported that homeopathic preparations are "unlikely to provoke severe adverse reactions".<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Dantas|first1=F|last2=Rampes|first2=H|year=2000|title=Do homeopathic medicines provoke adverse effects? A systematic review|journal=British Homoeopathic Journal|volume=89|pages=S35–S38|doi=10.1054/homp.1999.0378|pmid=10939781|s2cid=24738819}}</ref> In 2012, a systematic review evaluating evidence of homeopathy's possible [[adverse effect]]s concluded that "homeopathy has the potential to harm patients and consumers in both direct and indirect ways".<ref name="sr2012">{{cite journal|last1=Posadzki|first1=P|last2=Alotaibi|first2=A|last3=Ernst|first3=E|year=2012|title=Adverse effects of homeopathy: A systematic review of published case reports and case series|journal=International Journal of Clinical Practice|volume=66|issue=12|pages=1178–88|doi=10.1111/ijcp.12026|pmid=23163497|s2cid=2930768|doi-access=free}}</ref> A 2016 systematic review and meta-analysis found that, in homeopathic clinical trials, adverse effects were reported among the patients who received homeopathy about as often as they were reported among patients who received placebo or conventional medicine.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Stub|first1=T|last2=Musial|first2=F|last3=Kristoffersen|first3=AA|last4=Alræk|first4=T|last5=Liu|first5=J|date=June 2016|title=Adverse effects of homeopathy, what do we know? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials|url=https://munin.uit.no/bitstream/10037/10908/4/article.pdf|journal=Complementary Therapies in Medicine|volume=26|pages=146–63|doi=10.1016/j.ctim.2016.03.013|pmid=27261996|hdl=10037/10908}}</ref> |
|||
Some homeopathic preparations involve poisons such as [[Atropa belladonna|Belladonna]], [[arsenic]], and [[Toxicodendron radicans|poison ivy]]. In rare cases, the original ingredients are present at detectable levels. This may be due to improper preparation or intentional low dilution. Serious adverse effects such as seizures and death have been reported or associated with some homeopathic preparations.<ref name="sr2012" /> Instances of [[arsenic poisoning]] have occurred.<ref name="J Toxicology: Arsenic toxicity" /> In 2009, the FDA advised consumers to stop using three discontinued cold remedy [[Zicam]] products because it could cause permanent damage to users' sense of smell.<ref>Sources: |
|||
The medical effectiveness of homeopathy has been studied in detail since at least the 1980's, however there have been no large studies without methodological flaws that have shown homeopathy to be effective for medical purposes, and earlier studies showing positive results have been questioned.<ref name="pmid1825800"/> There have also been numerous landmark studies which have brought into question the validity of homeopathic treatments. In 2005 [[The Lancet]] medical journal published a meta-analysis of 110 placebo-controlled homeopathy trials and 110 matched conventional-medicine trials based upon the [[Swiss Federal Council|Swiss government]]'s [[Program for Evaluating Complementary Medicine]], or PEK. The findings of the study concluded that it's findings were compatible with the notion that the clinical effects of homeopathy are nothing more than placebo effects.<ref name=pmid16125589>{{cite journal |
|||
|author=Shang A, Huwiler-Müntener K, Nartey L, ''et al'' |
|||
|title=Are the clinical effects of homoeopathy placebo effects? Comparative study of placebo-controlled trials of homoeopathy and allopathy |
|||
|journal=Lancet |
|||
|volume=366 |
|||
|issue=9487 |
|||
|pages=726-32 |
|||
|year=2005 |
|||
|pmid=16125589 |
|||
|doi=10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67177-2 |
|||
|issn= |
|||
}}</ref> Critics cite the numerous other studies which show no evidence of homeopathy being effective beyond placebo, including a European Journal of Cancer study done in 2006. The study was a [[meta-analysis]] of six trials of homeopathic treatments for recovery from [[Oncology|cancer therapy]], including [[radiotherapy|radio]] and [[chemotherapy]] done since 1985. Three of the trials included were randomized [[double-blind]] placebo-controlled clinical trials. The conclusions of the study was that there was insufficient evidence to support clinical efficacy of homeopathic therapy in treating cancer.<ref name="pmid16376071">{{cite journal |
|||
|author=Milazzo S, Russell N, Ernst E |
|||
|title=Efficacy of homeopathic therapy in cancer treatment |
|||
|journal=Eur. J. Cancer |
|||
|volume=42 |
|||
|issue=3 |
|||
|pages=282-9 |
|||
|year=2006 |
|||
|pmid=16376071 |
|||
|doi=10.1016/j.ejca.2005.09.025 |
|||
|issn= |
|||
}}</ref> |
|||
* {{cite news|author=Julianne Pepitone|date=June 16, 2009|title=Zicam may damage sense of smell – FDA|publisher=[[CNNMoney.com]]|url=https://money.cnn.com/2009/06/16/news/companies/zicam_sense_of_smell/index.htm?section=money_latest}} |
|||
Since homeopathic remedies at dilutions higher than about D23 (10<sup>-23</sup>) contain no ingredients apart from the diluent (water, alcohol or sugar), there is no chemical basis for them to have any medicinal action. While some tests have suggested that homeopathic solutions of high dilution can have statistically significant effects on organic processes including the growth of [[grain]]<ref>Kolisko, Lily, ''Physiologisher und physikalischer Nachweis der Wirksamkeit kleinster Entitäten'', Stuttgart (1959), Junker, H. ''Biologisches Zentralblatt'', 45. Nr. 1 (1925), p. 26 and ''Plügers Arhiv f. ges. Phys. 219B Nr. 5/6 (1928)</ref>,[[histamine]] release by [[leukocytes]]<ref name="pmid16813505">{{cite journal |
|||
* {{cite web|date=June 16, 2009|title=Information on Zicam Cold Remedy nasal gel, Zicam Cold Remedy nasal swabs, and Zicam Cold Remedy swabs, kids size|url=https://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/PostmarketDrugSafetyInformationforPatientsandProviders/ucm166834.htm|publisher=[[Food and Drug Administration (United States)|FDA]]}}</ref> In 2016 the FDA issued a safety alert to consumers<ref name="FDAconsumers">{{cite web |url=https://www.fda.gov/safety/medwatch/safetyinformation/safetyalertsforhumanmedicalproducts/ucm523435.htm |title=Homeopathic Teething Tablets and Gels: FDA Warning – Risk to Infants and Children |publisher=FDA |date=September 30, 2016 |access-date=October 17, 2016}}</ref> warning against the use of homeopathic teething gels and tablets following reports of adverse events after their use.<ref name="FDANewsRelease">{{cite web |url=https://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm523468.htm |title=FDA warns against the use of homeopathic teething tablets and gels |publisher=FDA |date=September 30, 2016 |access-date=October 17, 2016}}</ref> A previous FDA investigation had found that these products were improperly diluted and contained "unsafe levels of belladonna" and that the reports of serious adverse events in children using this product were "consistent with belladonna toxicity".<ref name="arstechnicaFDA">{{cite web |url=http://arstechnica.co.uk/science/2016/10/fda-homeopathic-teething-gels-may-have-killed-10-babies-sickened-400/ |title=FDA: Homeopathic teething gels may have killed 10 babies, sickened 400 |publisher=Ars Technica UK |date=October 13, 2016 |access-date=October 17, 2016 |author=Mole, Beth}}</ref> |
|||
|author=Wälchli C, Baumgartner S, Bastide M |
|||
|title=Effect of low doses and high homeopathic potencies in normal and cancerous human lymphocytes: an in vitro isopathic study |
|||
Patients who choose to use homeopathy rather than [[evidence-based medicine]] risk missing timely diagnosis and effective treatment, thereby worsening the outcomes of serious conditions such as cancer.<ref name="Mayo Clinic Proceedings: trials" /><ref name="pmid12974558">{{cite journal |last1=Malik |first1=IA |last2=Gopalan |first2=S |title=Use of CAM results in delay in seeking medical advice for breast cancer |journal=European Journal of Epidemiology |volume=18 |issue=8 |pages=817–22 |year=2002 |pmid=12974558 |doi=10.1023/A:1025343720564 |s2cid=19059757 |quote=CAM use [in the developing countries this study solely considered] was associated with delay in seeking medical advice (OR: 5.6; 95% CI: 2.3, 13.3) and presentation at an advanced stage of disease}}</ref><ref name="pmid8554846" /><ref name="BBC malaria" /> The Russian [[Commission on Pseudoscience]] has said homeopathy is not safe because "patients spend significant amounts of money, buying medicines that do not work and disregard already known effective treatment."<ref>{{Cite web|date=2017-02-07|title=Memorandum #2. Homeopathy as pseudoscience|url=http://klnran.ru/en/2017/02/memorandum02-homeopathy/|access-date=March 19, 2021|website=[[Commission on Pseudoscience]]}}</ref> Critics have cited cases of patients failing to receive proper treatment for diseases that could have been easily managed with conventional medicine and who have died as a result.<ref name="Baby_Gloria">Case of Baby Gloria, who died in 2002: |
|||
|journal=Journal of alternative and complementary medicine (New York, N.Y.) |
|||
*{{cite news |
|||
|volume=12 |
|||
|title = Homeopath Thomas Sam guilty of daughter Gloria's death |
|||
|issue=5 |
|||
|newspaper = [[The Daily Telegraph (Sydney)|The Daily Telegraph]] |
|||
|pages=421-7 |
|||
|location = Sydney |
|||
|year=2006 |
|||
|date = June 5, 2009 |
|||
|pmid=16813505 |
|||
|url = http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/homeopath-thomas-sam-guilty-of-daughter-glorias-death/story-e6freuy9-1225723018271 |
|||
|doi=10.1089/acm.2006.12.421 |
|||
|access-date = March 17, 2010 |
|||
|issn= |
|||
|archive-date = November 18, 2012 |
|||
}}</ref>,and [[enzyme|enzyme reactions]], such studies are disputed since attempts to replicate them have almost always failed.<ref name="pmid11316508">{{cite journal |
|||
|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20121118064506/http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/homeopath-thomas-sam-guilty-of-daughter-glorias-death/story-e6freuy9-1225723018271 |
|||
|author=Walach H, Köster H, Hennig T, Haag G |
|||
}} |
|||
|title=The effects of homeopathic belladonna 30CH in healthy volunteers -- a randomized, double-blind experiment |
|||
*{{cite news |
|||
|journal=Journal of psychosomatic research |
|||
|title = Parents guilty of manslaughter over daughter's eczema death |
|||
|volume=50 |
|||
|newspaper = [[The Canberra Times]] |
|||
|issue=3 |
|||
|date = June 5, 2009 |
|||
|pages=155-60 |
|||
|url = http://www.canberratimes.com.au/news/national/national/general/parents-guilty-of-manslaughter-over-daughters-eczema-death/1533293.aspx |
|||
|year=2001 |
|||
|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20100625160931/http://www.canberratimes.com.au/news/national/national/general/parents-guilty-of-manslaughter-over-daughters-eczema-death/1533293.aspx |
|||
|pmid=11316508 |
|||
|archive-date = June 25, 2010 |
|||
|doi= |
|||
|df = mdy-all |
|||
|issn= |
|||
}}</ref><ref name="Dingle">{{cite web |author1=Alastair Neil Hope |author2=State Coroner |url=https://www.scribd.com/doc/68731728/Coroner-Dingle-Finding |title=Coroner's inquest into the death of Penelope Dingle. Ref No: 17/10 }}</ref> They have also condemned the "marketing practice" of criticizing and downplaying the effectiveness of medicine.<ref name="Goldacre20072" /><ref name="Dingle" /> Homeopaths claim that use of conventional medicines will "push the disease deeper" and cause more serious conditions, a process referred to as "suppression".<ref> |
|||
}}</ref><ref name="pmid8255290">{{cite journal |
|||
{{cite book |
|||
|author=Hirst SJ, Hayes NA, Burridge J, Pearce FL, Foreman JC |
|||
|author=Schmukler AV |
|||
|title=Human basophil degranulation is not triggered by very dilute antiserum against human IgE |
|||
|year=2006 |
|||
|journal=Nature |
|||
|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=E1fVzLCmk5gC&q=suppression+homeopathy&pg=PA16 |
|||
|volume=366 |
|||
|title=Homeopathy: An A to Z Home Handbook |
|||
|issue=6455 |
|||
|publisher=Llewellyn Worldwide |
|||
|pages=525-7 |
|||
|page=16 |
|||
|year=1993 |
|||
|isbn=978-0-7387-0873-7 |
|||
|pmid=8255290 |
|||
}}</ref> In 1978, [[Anthony Campbell (physician)|Anthony Campbell]], a consultant physician at the Royal London Homeopathic Hospital, criticized statements by [[George Vithoulkas]] claiming that [[syphilis]], when treated with antibiotics, would develop into secondary and tertiary syphilis with involvement of the [[central nervous system]].<ref>{{cite journal|author=Campbell A|date=October 1978|title=The science of homoeopathy, by G. Vithoulkas|journal=British Homoeopathic Journal|type=book review|volume=67|issue=4|pages=299–301|doi=10.1016/S0007-0785(78)80061-1|s2cid=69144584 }}</ref> Vithoulkas' claims echo the idea that treating a disease with external medication used to treat the symptoms would only drive it deeper into the body and conflict with scientific studies, which indicate that [[penicillin]] treatment produces a complete cure of syphilis in more than 90% of cases.<ref name="Birnbaum">{{cite journal|vauthors=Birnbaum NR, Goldschmidt RH, Buffett WO|year=1999|title=Resolving the common clinical dilemmas of syphilis|url=http://www.aafp.org/afp/990415ap/2233.html|journal=American Family Physician|volume=59|issue=8|pages=2233–40, 2245–46|pmid=10221308|access-date=September 3, 2007|archive-date=June 6, 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110606033808/http://www.aafp.org/afp/990415ap/2233.html}}</ref> |
|||
|doi=10.1038/366525a0 |
|||
|issn= |
|||
The use of homeopathy as a preventive for serious infectious diseases, called [[homeoprophylaxis]], is especially controversial.<ref name="BBC-malaria">{{cite news|date=January 5, 2011|title=Is bad homeopathic advice putting travellers at risk?|work=Newsnight|agency=BBC|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/newsnight/9341713.stm|access-date=January 10, 2015}}</ref> Some homeopaths (particularly those who are non-physicians) advise their patients against [[vaccine|immunization]].<ref name="pmid8554846" /><ref name="pmid9243229">{{cite journal |last1=Ernst |first1=E. |title=The attitude against immunisation within some branches of complementary medicine |journal=European Journal of Pediatrics |volume=156 |issue=7 |pages=513–15 |year=1997 |pmid=9243229 |doi=10.1007/s004310050650|s2cid=25420567 |doi-access=free }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Ernst |first1=E |title=Rise in popularity of complementary and alternative medicine: reasons and consequences for vaccination |journal=Vaccine |volume=20 |pages=S90–93; discussion S89 |year=2001 |doi=10.1016/S0264-410X(01)00290-0 |pmid=11587822}}</ref> Others have suggested that vaccines be replaced with homeopathic "nosodes".<ref> |
|||
}}</ref><ref name="pmid1376282">{{cite journal |
|||
{{cite journal |
|||
|author=Ovelgönne JH, Bol AW, Hop WC, van Wijk R |
|||
|author =Pray WS |
|||
|title=Mechanical agitation of very dilute antiserum against IgE has no effect on basophil staining properties |
|||
|title =The challenge to professionalism presented by homeopathy |
|||
|journal=Experientia |
|||
|journal =American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education |
|||
|volume=48 |
|||
|volume =60 |
|||
|issue=5 |
|||
|pages= |
|pages =198–204 |
||
|year= |
|year =1996 |
||
|issue =2 |
|||
|pmid=1376282 |
|||
|doi =10.1016/S0002-9459(24)04582-0 |
|||
|doi= |
|||
}}</ref> While Hahnemann was opposed to such preparations, modern homeopaths often use them although there is no evidence to indicate they have any beneficial effects.<ref> |
|||
|issn= |
|||
{{cite journal |
|||
|title =A challenge to the credibility of homeopathy |
|||
|author=Witt CM, Bluth M, Hinderlich S, ''et al'' |
|||
|journal =American Journal of Pain Management |
|||
|title=Does potentized HgCl2 (Mercurius corrosivus) affect the activity of diastase and alpha-amylase? |
|||
|year =1992 |
|||
|journal=Journal of alternative and complementary medicine (New York, N.Y.) |
|||
|author =Pray WS |
|||
|volume=12 |
|||
|issue= |
|issue =2 |
||
|pages= |
|pages =63–71 |
||
}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=English |first1=J |title=The issue of immunization |journal=British Homoeopathic Journal |volume=81 |pages=161–63 |year=1992 |doi=10.1016/S0007-0785(05)80171-1 |issue=4|s2cid=71502677 }}</ref> Promotion of homeopathic alternatives to vaccines has been characterized as dangerous, inappropriate and irresponsible.<ref name="CBC-Irresponsible">{{cite web|date=November 28, 2014|title=Vaccine alternatives offered by homeopaths 'irresponsible'|url=http://www.cbc.ca/news/health/vaccine-alternatives-offered-by-homeopaths-irresponsible-1.2852408|access-date=January 10, 2015|work=Marketplace|publisher=CBC}}</ref><ref name="BBC-Poling">{{cite news|author=Poling, Samantha|date=September 13, 2010|title=Doctors warn over homeopathic 'vaccines'|agency=BBC|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-11277990|access-date=January 10, 2015}}</ref> In December 2014, the Australian homeopathy supplier [[Homeopathy Plus!]] was found to have acted deceptively in promoting homeopathic alternatives to vaccines.<ref name="ACCC-HPlus">{{cite web|date=December 23, 2014|title=Court finds Homeopathy Plus! vaccine claims misleading|url=https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/court-finds-homeopathy-plus-vaccine-claims-misleading|access-date=January 10, 2015|publisher=Australian Competition and Consumer Commission}}</ref> In 2019, an investigative journalism piece by the [[The Daily Telegraph|''Telegraph'']] revealed that homeopathy practitioners were actively discouraging patients from vaccinating their children.<ref>{{Cite news|last1=Rushton|first1=Katherine|last2=Foggo|first2=Daniel|last3=Barnes|first3=Sophie|date=2019-11-01|title=Homeopaths warning mothers not to have children vaccinated, investigation reveals|language=en-GB|work=[[The Daily Telegraph]]|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/11/01/homeopaths-warning-mothers-not-have-children-vaccinated-investigation/ |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220111/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/11/01/homeopaths-warning-mothers-not-have-children-vaccinated-investigation/ |archive-date=January 11, 2022 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live|access-date=2019-11-03|issn=0307-1235}}{{cbignore}}</ref> Cases of homeopaths advising against the use of anti-malarial drugs have also been identified,<ref name="BBC malaria" /><ref name="Guardian malaria" /><ref name="pmid11082104" /> putting visitors to the tropics in severe danger.<ref name="BBC malaria"> |
|||
|year=2006 |
|||
{{cite news |
|||
|pmid=16722785 |
|||
|author =Jones M |
|||
|doi=10.1089/acm.2006.12.359 |
|||
|title =Malaria advice 'risks lives' |
|||
|issn= |
|||
|date =July 14, 2006 |
|||
}}</ref><ref name="pmid16036166">{{cite journal |
|||
|periodical =[[Newsnight]] |
|||
|author=Guggisberg AG, Baumgartner SM, Tschopp CM, Heusser P |
|||
|publisher =[[BBC Television]] |
|||
|title=Replication study concerning the effects of homeopathic dilutions of histamine on human basophil degranulation in vitro |
|||
|url =http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/newsnight/5178122.stm |
|||
|journal=Complementary therapies in medicine |
|||
|access-date =March 24, 2009 |
|||
|volume=13 |
|||
}}</ref><ref name="Guardian malaria"> |
|||
|issue=2 |
|||
{{cite news |
|||
|pages=91-100 |
|||
|author =Jha A |
|||
|year=2005 |
|||
|title =Homeopaths 'endangering lives' by offering malaria remedies |
|||
|pmid=16036166 |
|||
|date =July 14, 2006 |
|||
|doi=10.1016/j.ctim.2005.04.003 |
|||
|url =https://www.theguardian.com/science/story/0,,1820103,00.html |
|||
|issn= |
|||
|newspaper =[[The Guardian]] |
|||
}}</ref> Newer randomized, [[double-blind]], [[placebo]]-controlled trials using high dilutions of substances such as Belladona also fail to find clinical effects of the substances.<ref name="pmid14651731">{{cite journal |
|||
|location =London |
|||
|author=Brien S, Lewith G, Bryant T |
|||
}}</ref><ref name="pmid11082104">{{cite journal |last1=Starr |first1=M. |title=Malaria affects children and pregnant women most |journal=BMJ |volume=321 |page=1288 |year=2000 |doi=10.1136/bmj.321.7271.1288 |issue=7271|pmc=1119021 |pmid=11082103}}</ref><ref name="Coffman">{{cite web|author=Coffman, Becky |url=https://www.cdc.gov/malaria/stories/homeopathic_drugs.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140324180407/https://www.cdc.gov/malaria/stories/homeopathic_drugs.html |archive-date=March 24, 2014 |title=A cautionary tale: the risks of unproven antimalarials |publisher=[[Centers for Disease Control]] |date=January 28, 2019 }}{{cbignore}}</ref> |
|||
|title=Ultramolecular homeopathy has no observable clinical effects. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled proving trial of Belladonna 30C |
|||
|journal=British journal of clinical pharmacology |
|||
A 2006 review recommends that pharmacy colleges include a required course where ethical dilemmas inherent in recommending products lacking proven safety and efficacy data be discussed and that students should be taught where unproven systems such as homeopathy depart from evidence-based medicine.<ref> |
|||
|volume=56 |
|||
{{cite journal |
|||
|issue=5 |
|||
|author=Pray WS |
|||
|pages=562-8 |
|||
|title=Ethical, scientific, and educational concerns with unproven medications |
|||
|year=2003 |
|||
|journal=American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education |
|||
|pmid=14651731 |
|||
|volume=70 |
|||
|doi= |
|||
| |
|issue=6 |
||
|page=141 |
|||
|year=2006 |
|||
|pmid=17332867 |
|||
|pmc=1803699 |
|||
|doi=10.5688/aj7006141 |
|||
}}</ref> |
}}</ref> |
||
==Regulation and prevalence== |
|||
Critics assert that the best standard for assessing efficacy and safety of health-care practices is [[evidence-based medicine]] because it is the expression of the scientific method in clinical medicine.<ref>[http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/321/7258/442 "Declaration of Helsinki should be strengthened" ''BMJ'' 2000;321:442-445 ( 12 August )]</ref> They contend that systematic reviews with strict protocols are essential to establish the substantion of various therapies and that when homeopathy is tested in this way against specific diseases, it has failed to show any medical effectivness. Systematic reviews conducted by the [[Cochrane Collaboration]] found no evidence that homeopathy is beneficial for [[asthma]]<ref name="pmid14973954">{{cite journal |
|||
{{Main|Regulation and prevalence of homeopathy}} |
|||
|author=McCarney RW, Linde K, Lasserson TJ |
|||
[[File:Bristol Homeopathic.jpg|thumb|Hampton House, the former site of [[Bristol Homeopathic Hospital]]]] |
|||
|title=Homeopathy for chronic asthma |
|||
|journal=Cochrane database of systematic reviews (Online) |
|||
|volume= |
|||
|issue=1 |
|||
|pages=CD000353 |
|||
|year=2004 |
|||
|pmid=14973954 |
|||
|doi=10.1002/14651858.CD000353.pub2 |
|||
|issn= |
|||
}}</ref>, [[dementia]]<ref name="pmid12535487">{{cite journal |
|||
|author=McCarney R, Warner J, Fisher P, Van Haselen R |
|||
|title=Homeopathy for dementia |
|||
|journal=Cochrane database of systematic reviews (Online) |
|||
|volume= |
|||
|issue=1 |
|||
|pages=CD003803 |
|||
|year=2003 |
|||
|pmid=12535487 |
|||
|doi= |
|||
|issn= |
|||
}}</ref>, or [[induction (birth)|induction of labor]].<ref name="pmid14583972">{{cite journal |
|||
|author=Smith CA |
|||
|title=Homoeopathy for induction of labour |
|||
|journal=Cochrane database of systematic reviews (Online) |
|||
|volume= |
|||
|issue=4 |
|||
|pages=CD003399 |
|||
|year=2003 |
|||
|pmid=14583972 |
|||
|doi=10.1002/14651858.CD003399 |
|||
|issn= |
|||
}}</ref> Systematic reviews conducted by other researchers found no evidence that homeopathy is beneficial for [[osteoarthritis]]<ref name="pmid11212088">{{cite journal |
|||
|author=Long L, Ernst E |
|||
|title=Homeopathic remedies for the treatment of osteoarthritis: a systematic review |
|||
|journal=The British homoeopathic journal |
|||
|volume=90 |
|||
|issue=1 |
|||
|pages=37-43 |
|||
|year=2001 |
|||
|pmid=11212088 |
|||
|doi= |
|||
|issn= |
|||
}}</ref>, [[migrane]]s<ref name="pmid9251877">{{cite journal |
|||
|author=Whitmarsh TE, Coleston-Shields DM, Steiner TJ |
|||
|title=Double-blind randomized placebo-controlled study of homoeopathic prophylaxis of migraine |
|||
|journal=Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache |
|||
|volume=17 |
|||
|issue=5 |
|||
|pages=600-4 |
|||
|year=1997 |
|||
|pmid=9251877 |
|||
|doi= |
|||
|issn= |
|||
}}</ref> or [[Delayed onset muscle soreness|delayed-onset muscle soreness]]<ref name="pmid12614092">{{cite journal |
|||
|author=Jonas WB, Kaptchuk TJ, Linde K |
|||
|title=A critical overview of homeopathy |
|||
|journal=Ann. Intern. Med. |
|||
|volume=138 |
|||
|issue=5 |
|||
|pages=393-9 |
|||
|year=2003 |
|||
|pmid=12614092 |
|||
|doi= |
|||
|issn= |
|||
}}</ref>. |
|||
Homeopathy is fairly common in some countries while being uncommon in others; is highly regulated in some countries and mostly unregulated in others. It is practiced worldwide and professional qualifications and licences are needed in most countries.<ref name="Who Legal">{{Cite web|date=2001|title=Legal Status of Traditional Medicine and Complementary/Alternative Medicine: A Worldwide Review|url=http://apps.who.int/medicinedocs/pdf/h2943e/h2943e.pdf|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090927001352/http://apps.who.int/medicinedocs/pdf/h2943e/h2943e.pdf|archive-date=September 27, 2009|access-date=2020-09-01|website=World Health Organization}}</ref> A 2019 WHO report found that 100 out of 133 Member States surveyed in 2012 acknowledged that their population used homeopathy, with 22 saying the practice was regulated and 13 providing health insurance coverage.<ref name="WHO traditional">{{Cite web|date=4 June 2019|title=WHO global report on traditional and complementary medicine 2019|url=https://www.who.int/traditional-complementary-integrative-medicine/WhoGlobalReportOnTraditionalAndComplementaryMedicine2019.pdf?ua=1|access-date=2020-09-04|website=WHO|language=en}}</ref> In some countries, there are no specific legal regulations concerning the use of homeopathy, while in others, licences or degrees in conventional medicine from accredited universities are required. In 2001 homeopathy had been integrated into the national health care systems of many countries, including India, Mexico, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, and the United Kingdom.<ref name="Who Legal" /> |
|||
Numerous health organizations such as UK's [[National Health Service]]<ref name=nhspseudo> {{cite web|url=http://www.nhsdirect.nhs.uk/articles/article.aspx?articleId=197§ionId=27 |title=Homeopathy results |accessdate=2007-07-25 |publisher=[[National Health Service]] }}</ref>, the [[American Medical Association]]<ref name=amapseudo> {{cite web|url=http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/category/13638.html |title=Report 12 of the Council on Scientific Affairs (A-97) |accessdate=2007-07-25 |publisher=[[American Medical Association]] }}</ref>, and the [[FASEB]]<ref> {{cite journal|title=Homeopathy: Holmes, Hogwarts, and the Prince of Wales|journal=The FASEB Journal.|date=2006|first=Gerald|last=Weissmann|coauthors=|volume=20|issue=|pages=1755-1758|id=PMID 16940145 |url=http://www.fasebj.org/cgi/content/full/20/11/1755|format=|accessdate=2007-08-13}}</ref> also contend that there is no scientific evidence supporting the validity of homeopathic treatments. |
|||
=== Regulation === |
|||
===Safety of homeopathic treatments=== |
|||
Some homeopathic treatment is covered by the public health service of several European countries, including Scotland,<ref>{{cite news |last1=Green |first1=Chris |title=Scotland urged to stop funding homeopathy on NHS |url=https://inews.co.uk/news/health/scotland-urged-stop-funding-homeopathy-nhs-522057 |access-date=18 January 2020 |publisher=iNews |date=2 August 2017}}</ref> and [[Luxembourg]].<ref>{{cite web |last1=Clarinval |first1=France |title=Homeopathy to remain reimbursable in Luxembourg |url=https://today.rtl.lu/news/luxembourg/a/1393668.html |website=today.rt.lu |publisher=RTL Today |access-date=4 May 2020}}</ref> It used to be covered in France until 2021.<ref name="FranceEndFunding2021" /> In other countries, such as Belgium, homeopathy is not covered. In Austria, the public health service requires scientific proof of effectiveness in order to reimburse medical treatments and homeopathy is listed as not reimbursable,<ref> |
|||
{{cite web|author=[[Central Association of Austrian Social Insurance Authorities|Hauptverband der österreichischen Sozialversicherungsträger]]|date=March 31, 2004|title=Liste nicht erstattungsfähiger Arzneimittelkategorien gemäß § 351c Abs. 2 ASVG (List of treatments not reimbursable by social service providers in Austria)|url=https://www.avsv.at/avi/dokument/dokumentanzeige.xhtml?dokid=2004%3D34&dokStat=0&csrId=1736&tlId=1231413537940|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110706091417/https://www.avsv.at/avi/dokument/dokumentanzeige.xhtml?dokid=2004%3D34&dokStat=0&csrId=1736&tlId=1231413537940|archive-date=July 6, 2011|language=de|df=mdy-all}}</ref> but exceptions can be made;<ref> |
|||
{{cite court|litigants=Rechtssatz (legal rule)|court=Oberster Gerichtshof (Austrian supreme court)|opinion=RS0083796 {{in lang|de}}|date=February 28, 1994|url=http://www.ris.bka.gv.at/Dokumente/Justiz/JJR_19940228_OGH0002_010OBS00103_9300000_001/JJR_19940228_OGH0002_010OBS00103_9300000_001.pdf|format=PDF}}</ref> private health insurance policies sometimes include homeopathic treatments.<ref name="Who Legal" /> In 2018, Austria's [[Medical University of Vienna]] stopped teaching homeopathy.<ref name="Undark 2020-09-02">{{Cite web|date=2020-03-16|title=In Germany, a Heated Debate Over Homeopathy|url=https://undark.org/2020/03/16/homeopathy-globuli-germany/|access-date=2020-09-02|website=Undark Magazine|language=en-US}}</ref> The Swiss government withdrew coverage of homeopathy and four other complementary treatments in 2005, stating that they did not meet efficacy and cost-effectiveness criteria,<ref name="EndofHomeopathy">{{cite journal|author=<!-- No author listed -->|year=2005|title=The end of homoeopathy|journal=The Lancet|volume=366|issue=9487|page=690|doi=10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67149-8|pmid=16125567|s2cid=6115077|doi-access=free}}</ref> but following a referendum in 2009 the five therapies were reinstated for a further 6-year trial period.<ref>{{cite web|author=Dacey J|date=January 14, 2011|title=Alternative therapies are put to the test|url=http://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/swiss_news/Alternative_therapies_are_put_to_the_test.html?cid=29242484|access-date=January 17, 2011|publisher=swissinfo.ch|archive-date=April 22, 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140422184705/http://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/swiss_news/Alternative_therapies_are_put_to_the_test.html?cid=29242484|url-status=dead}}</ref> In Germany, homeopathic treatments are covered by 70 percent of government medical plans, and available in almost every pharmacy.<ref name="Undark 2020-09-02" /> In January 2024, [[Federal Ministry of Health (Germany)|German health minister]] [[Karl Lauterbach]] announced plans to withdraw all statutory health insurance coverage for homeopathic and anthroposophic treatments, citing a lack of scientific evidence for their efficacy.<ref>{{cite web|author=Tagesschau|date=January 11, 2024|title="Homöopathie macht als Kassenleistung keinen Sinn"|url=https://www.tagesschau.de/inland/innenpolitik/lauterbach-homoeopathie-kassenleistung-100.html|access-date=January 18, 2024|publisher=tagesschau.de}}</ref> |
|||
The English NHS recommended against prescribing homeopathic preparations in 2017.<ref name="NHS Homeo" /> In 2018, prescriptions worth £55,000 were written in defiance of the guidelines, representing less than 0.001% of the total NHS prescribing budget.<ref>{{Cite web|date=2017-10-18|title=Homeopathy|url=https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/homeopathy/|access-date=2020-01-18|website=nhs.uk|language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|last1=Donnelly|first1=Laura|last2=Taylor|first2=Rosie|date=2019-04-05|title=NHS still spending £55,000 a year on homeopathy, despite ban|language=en-GB|work=The Telegraph|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/04/05/nhs-still-spending-55000-year-homeopathy-despite-ban/ |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220111/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/04/05/nhs-still-spending-55000-year-homeopathy-despite-ban/ |archive-date=January 11, 2022 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live|access-date=2020-01-18|issn=0307-1235}}{{cbignore}}</ref> In 2016 the UK's [[Committee of Advertising Practice]] compliance team wrote to homeopaths<ref name="NightingaleASA_CAP">{{cite web|date=September 29, 2016|title=Diluting misleading claims – ASA update|url=http://www.nightingale-collaboration.org/news/185-diluting-misleading-claims-asa-update.html|access-date=September 30, 2016|publisher=Nightingale Collaboration}}</ref> in the UK to "remind them of the rules that govern what they can and can't say in their marketing materials".<ref name="ASA_CAP">{{cite web|date=September 29, 2016|title=Advertising standards for homeopathy|url=https://www.asa.org.uk/News-resources/Media-Centre/2016/Advertising-standards-for-homeopathy.aspx|access-date=September 30, 2016|publisher=Advertising Standards Authority}}</ref> The letter told homeopaths to "ensure that they do not make any direct or implied claims that homeopathy can treat medical conditions" and asks them to review their marketing communications "including websites and social media pages" to ensure compliance.<ref name="LetterToHomeopaths">{{cite web|author=CAP Compliance Team|date=September 28, 2016|title=Advertising standsards for homeopaths|url=https://www.asa.org.uk/News-resources/Media-Centre/2016/~/media/Files/CAP/News/Letter%20to%20Homeopaths.pdf|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161003143347/https://www.asa.org.uk/News-resources/Media-Centre/2016/~/media/Files/CAP/News/Letter%20to%20Homeopaths.pdf|archive-date=October 3, 2016|access-date=September 30, 2016|publisher=Committee of Advertising Practice|df=mdy-all}}</ref> Homeopathic services offered at [[Bristol Homeopathic Hospital]] in the UK ceased in October 2015.<ref name="GoodThinking">{{cite web|date=June 5, 2015|title=Bristol Homeopathic Hospital To Cease Offering Homeopathic Treatments|url=http://goodthinkingsociety.org/bristol-homeopathic-hospital-cease-offering-homeopathic-treatments/|access-date=April 29, 2016|publisher=Good Thinking}}</ref><ref name="BristolPost-10-06-2015">{{cite news|last1=Cardwell|first1=Mark|date=June 10, 2015|title=Homeopathy services will no longer be available at Bristol NHS Trust hospitals|work=Bristol Post|url=http://www.bristolpost.co.uk/Homeopathy-services-longer-available-NHS-Bristol/story-26666377-detail/story.html|access-date=April 29, 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150928025310/http://www.bristolpost.co.uk/Homeopathy-services-longer-available-NHS-Bristol/story-26666377-detail/story.html|archive-date=September 28, 2015|df=mdy-all}}</ref> |
|||
While homeopathic remedies contain often only water and/or alcohol, they are often thought to be generally safe. However critics of homeopathy have cited numerous concerns over homeopathic remedies including patients of homeopathy failing to receive proper treatment for diseases which could be diagnosed or cured with modern medicine. For instance there have even been numerous surveys showing that homeopathic practitioners frequently advise their patients against receiving immunization for diseases.<ref name="pmid9243229">{{cite journal |
|||
|author=Ernst E |
|||
|title=The attitude against immunisation within some branches of complementary medicine |
|||
|journal=Eur. J. Pediatr. |
|||
|volume=156 |
|||
|issue=7 |
|||
|pages=513-5 |
|||
|year=1997 |
|||
|pmid=9243229 |
|||
|doi= |
|||
|issn= |
|||
}}</ref><ref name="pmid8554846">{{cite journal |
|||
|author=Ernst E, White AR |
|||
|title=Homoeopathy and immunization |
|||
|journal=The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners |
|||
|volume=45 |
|||
|issue=400 |
|||
|pages=629-30 |
|||
|year=1995 |
|||
|pmid=8554846 |
|||
|doi= |
|||
|issn= |
|||
}}</ref> Modern homeopathic practitioners also use their own [[vaccines]], which they refer to as "[[nosode]]s", and are created from dilutions of highly infectious agents including material such as vomit, fecal matter or infected human tissues. While Hahnemann was opposed to such preparations, modern homeopaths frequently use them and there is no evidence to suggests such vaccines have any effectiveness.<ref name="Ramey"/>Homeopaths in advising against the use of anti-malarial drugs may often help to contribute in the spread of malaria due to the ineffectiveness of homeopathic remedies used to treat malaria.<ref>{{cite news | first=Alok | last=Jha | coauthors= | title=Homeopaths 'endangering lives' by offering malaria remedies | date=[[2006-07-14]] | publisher= | url =http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/story/0,,1820103,00.html | work =Guardian Unlimited | pages = | accessdate = 2007-07-25 | language = }}</ref><ref name="pmid11082104">{{cite journal |
|||
|author=Delaunay P, Cua E, Lucas P, Marty P |
|||
|title=Homoeopathy may not be effective in preventing malaria |
|||
|journal=BMJ |
|||
|volume=321 |
|||
|issue=7271 |
|||
|pages=1288 |
|||
|year=2000 |
|||
|pmid=11082104 |
|||
|doi= |
|||
|issn= |
|||
}}</ref><ref>{{cite news | first=Meirion | last=Jones | coauthors= | title=Malaria advice 'risks lives' | date=[[2006-07-14]] | publisher=[[BBC News]] | url =http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/newsnight/5178122.stm | work =BBC News | pages = | accessdate = 2007-07-25 | language = }}</ref> |
|||
Member states of the [[European Union]] are required to ensure that homeopathic products are registered, although this process does not require any proof of efficacy.<ref name="Commander Snake">{{Cite web|last=Commander|first=Emily|date=2018-10-01|title=Snake oil or science? Homeopathy in Europe|url=https://www.euronews.com/2018/10/01/snake-oil-or-science-homeopathy-in-europe|access-date=2020-09-04|website=euronews|language=en}}</ref> In Spain, the [[Association for the protection of patients from pseudo-scientific therapies]] is lobbying to get rid of the easy registration procedure for homeopathic remedies.<ref name="Commander Snake" /> In Bulgaria, Hungary, Latvia, Romania and Slovenia homeopathy, by law, can only be practiced by medical practitioners. However, in Slovenia if doctors practice homeopathy their medical license will be revoked.<ref name="Commander Snake" /> In Germany, to become a homeopathic physician, one must attend a three-year training program, while France, Austria and Denmark mandate licences to diagnose any illness or dispense of any product whose purpose is to treat any illness.<ref name="Who Legal" /> Homeopaths in the UK are under no legal regulations, meaning anyone can call themselves homeopaths and administer homeopathic remedies.<ref name="NHS Homeo">{{Cite web|date=2017-10-18|title=Homeopathy|url=https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/homeopathy/|access-date=2020-09-02|website=nhs.uk|language=en}}</ref>[[File:India - Varanasi pharmacy - 0830.jpg|left|thumb|Homeopathics at a homeopathic pharmacy in [[Varanasi]], India]] |
|||
Critics contend that it is inherently unethical to provide homeopathic remedies to patients or to owners of animals when the effectiveness of homeopathy is clearly unproven. Critics also assert that all homeopathic patients or clients should be fully informed of the lack of experimental basis for the effectiveness of homeopathy prior to being provided the remedies. Critics say that it would be obviously unethical to employ unsupported and unproven remedies such as homeopathy when alternative remedies in modern medicine have been proven to be effective.<ref name="Ramey"/> |
|||
[[File:A local store of Homeopathic medicines at Jagadishpur Hat, West Bengal.jpg|thumb|Homeopathic medicines at a store in [[West Bengal]], India]] |
|||
The [[Indian government]] recognizes homeopathy as one of its national systems of medicine and they are sold with medical claims.<ref>{{cite web |
|||
|url = http://india.gov.in/citizen/health/healthcare_system.php |
|||
|title = Alternative System of Health Care |
|||
|publisher = Government of India |
|||
|access-date = January 15, 2010 |
|||
|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20100102154756/http://india.gov.in/citizen/health/healthcare_system.php |
|||
|archive-date = January 2, 2010 |
|||
}}</ref><ref name="WHO traditional" /> It has established the [[Department of Ayurveda, Yoga and Naturopathy, Unani, Siddha and Homoeopathy]] (AYUSH) under the [[Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (India)|Ministry of Health & Family Welfare]].<ref>{{cite news|url=http://indianmedicine.nic.in/index.asp?lang=1|title=AYUSH|publisher=[[Government of India]]. website|archive-url=https://archive.today/20130822171213/http://indianmedicine.nic.in/index.asp?lang=1|archive-date=August 22, 2013|df=mdy-all}}</ref> The south Indian state of [[Kerala]] also has a cabinet-level AYUSH department.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.homoeoscan.com/2015/06/Kerala-AYUSH-department-Final-nod.html|title=Kerala AYUSH department- Final nod|date=June 4, 2015|website=Homoeoscan|access-date=October 1, 2017}}</ref> The [[Central Council of Homoeopathy]] was established in 1973 to monitor higher education in homeopathy, and the [[National Institute of Homoeopathy]] in 1975.<ref>{{cite web|title=Professional Councils |url=http://www.ugc.ac.in/inside/pcouncil.html#CCH |publisher=[[University Grants Commission (India)|University Grants Commission]] (UGC) website |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100106075646/http://www.ugc.ac.in/inside/pcouncil.html |archive-date=January 6, 2010 }}</ref> Principals and standards for homeopathic products are covered by the ''[[Homoeopathic pharmacopoeia of India]]''.<ref name="WHO Safety" /> A minimum of a recognized diploma in homeopathy and registration on a state register or the Central Register of Homoeopathy is required to practice homeopathy in India.<ref>{{cite web |
|||
|url = http://www.cchindia.com/central_act3.htm |
|||
|title = The Homoeopathy Central Council Act, 1973, s. 15 and Sch. II |
|||
|publisher = Central Council of Homeopathy, India |
|||
|access-date = January 18, 2010 |
|||
|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20091123105853/http://www.cchindia.com/central_act3.htm |
|||
|archive-date = November 23, 2009 |
|||
|df = mdy-all |
|||
}}</ref> |
|||
Some [[medical school]]s in Pakistan,<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/436504-govt-asked-to-set-up-university-to-promote-homoeopathy |title=Govt asked to set up university to promote homoeopathy}}</ref> India,<ref>{{cite news|last1=MANDHANI|first1=APOORVA|title=Gujarat HC Quashes Rules Permitting Common Counselling By State For Management Quota Seats in Ayurveda Colleges [Read Judgment]|url=http://www.livelaw.in/gujarat-hc-quashes-rules-permitting-common-counselling-state-management-quota-seats-ayurveda-colleges-read-judgment/|publisher=Live Law|date=August 8, 2017}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=Alternative Medicine: Emerging Careers|url=https://www.northeasttoday.in/alternative-medicine-emerging-careers/|publisher=northeasttoday.in|date=March 23, 2017|access-date=March 4, 2021|archive-date=January 8, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180108062819/https://www.northeasttoday.in/alternative-medicine-emerging-careers/}}</ref> and Bangladesh,<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=7u8QjjEwif4C&q=bachelor+of+homoeopathy+medicine+and+surgery+in+bangladesh |title=Statistical Yearbook of Bangladesh|year=2012}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.homoeopathicboardbd.org/ |title=Bangladesh Homoeopathy Board – Bangladesh Homoeopathy Board}}</ref> offer an undergraduate degree programme in homeopathy.<ref>{{Cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=3RYrDwAAQBAJ&q=Bachelor+of+Homoeopathy+Medicine+and+Surgery&pg=PT77 |title=Educational Equivalency Analysis: India & USA Degrees: 108 India Degrees and Equivalency to USA degrees |isbn=978-93-5278-117-1 |last1=Raghu Korrapati |first1=Dr |date=2017-07-06|publisher=Diamond Pocket Books Pvt }}</ref> Upon completion the college may award a ''{{visible anchor|Bachelor of Homoeopathy Medicine and Surgery}}'' (''B.H.M.S.''). |
|||
== Legal trends == |
|||
In the United States each state is responsible for the laws and licensing requirements for homeopathy.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Practicing & Studying Homeopathy|url=https://www.homeopathycenter.org/practicing-studying-homeopathy/|access-date=2020-09-02|website=The National Center for Homeopathy|language=en|archive-date=April 14, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210414135845/https://www.homeopathycenter.org/practicing-studying-homeopathy/}}</ref> In 2015, the FDA held a hearing on homeopathic product regulation.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Frazier|first1=Kendrick|authorlink= Kendrick Frazier|year=2015|title=CFI testimony urges FDA to regulate homeopathic products|journal=Skeptical Inquirer|volume=39|issue=4|pages=6–7}}</ref> At the hearing, representatives from the [[Center for Inquiry]] and the [[Committee for Skeptical Inquiry]] summarized the harm that is done to the general public from homeopathics and proposed regulatory actions:<ref name="fdahearing">{{cite web|author=De Dora, Michael|date=April 20, 2015|title=Homeopathic product regulation: evaluating the Food and Drug Administration's regulatory framework after a quarter-century. Testimony of the Center for Inquiry to the Food and Drug Administration|url=https://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/NewsEvents/UCM443495.pdf|publisher=FDA}}</ref> In 2016 the United States [[Federal Trade Commission]] (FTC) issued an "Enforcement Policy Statement Regarding Marketing Claims for Over-the-Counter Homeopathic Drugs" which specified that the FTC will apply the same standard to homeopathic drugs that it applies to other products claiming similar benefits.<ref name="FTC2016">{{cite web|title=FTC: Enforcement Policy Statement on Marketing Claims for OTC Homeopathic Drugs|url=https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/documents/public_statements/996984/p114505_otc_homeopathic_drug_enforcement_policy_statement.pdf|access-date=November 18, 2016|publisher=Federal Trade Commission}}</ref> A related report concluded that claims of homeopathy effectiveness "are not accepted by most modern medical experts and do not constitute competent and reliable scientific evidence that these products have the claimed treatment effects."<ref name="WSReport">{{cite web|title=Homeopathic Medicine & Advertising Workshop Report|url=https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/documents/reports/federal-trade-commission-staff-report-homeopathic-medicine-advertising-workshop/p114505_otc_homeopathic_medicine_and_advertising_workshop_report.pdf|access-date=November 18, 2016|publisher=Federal Trade Commission}}</ref> In 2019, the FDA removed an enforcement policy that permitted unapproved homeopathics to be sold.<ref>{{Cite web|title=FDA Toughens Enforcement of Homeopathic Products|url=https://www.natlawreview.com/article/fda-toughens-enforcement-homeopathic-products|access-date=2020-09-02|website=The National Law Review|language=en}}</ref> Currently no homeopathic products are approved by the FDA.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Research|first=Center for Drug Evaluation and|date=2020-07-22|title=Homeopathic Products|url=https://www.fda.gov/drugs/information-drug-class/homeopathic-products|journal=FDA|language=en}}</ref> |
|||
Due to the controversial status and lack of scientific evidence supporting homeopathy, is regulated in some countries including strict regulations in Europe which have been implemented recently by the [[European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines|European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & Healthcare]].<ref>[http://www.pheur.org European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines] official website</ref> |
|||
Homeopathic remedies are regulated as natural health products in Canada.<ref name="WHO Safety" /> [[Ontario]] became the first province in the country to regulate the practice of homeopathy, a move that was widely criticized by scientists and doctors.<ref>{{Cite news|title='A pseudo-science': Outrage after Ontario government funds college program in homeopathy|url=https://nationalpost.com/news/canada/a-diploma-in-magical-thinking-critics-want-funding-pulled-for-ontario-colleges-homeopathy-course|access-date=2020-09-02|website=National Post|date=February 8, 2018|language=en-CA|last1=Kirkey|first1=Sharon}}</ref> [[Health Canada]] requires all products to have a licence before being sold and applicants have to submit evidence on "the safety, efficacy and quality of a homeopathic medicine".<ref>{{Cite web|last=Canada|first=Health|date=2006-10-26|title=Evidence for Homeopathic Medicines|url=https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/drugs-health-products/natural-non-prescription/legislation-guidelines/guidance-documents/evidence-homeopathic-medicines.html|access-date=2020-09-04|website=aem}}</ref> In 2015 the [[Canadian Broadcasting Corporation]] tested the system by applying for and then receiving a government approved licence for a made-up drug aimed at kids.<ref>{{Cite web|date=Mar 13, 2015|title=Drugstore remedies: Licence to Deceive|url=https://www.cbc.ca/marketplace/episodes/2014-2015/drugstore-remedies-licence-to-deceive|website=CBC}}</ref> |
|||
=== United States === |
|||
In the United States, homeopathic remedies are, like all health-care products, regulated by the [[Food and Drug Administration]] - the CFSAN ([[Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition]]) sector of the FDA deals with the dietary supplements, as well as cosmetics and food. However, the FDA treats homeopathic remedies very differently than conventional medicines. Homeopathic products do not need FDA approval before sale; they do have to be proven safe since the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994, any products prior to 1994 may or may not have been tested for safety, but they do not have to prove efficacy; they do not have to be labeled with an expiration date; and they do not have to undergo finished product testing to verify contents and strength, all of these are voluntary actions done by the manufacturer. The manufacturer is required to have all ingredients on the label; however, it might not specify which ones are active. In the USA, only homeopathic medicines that claim to treat self-limiting conditions may be sold over the counter; homeopathic medicines that claim to treat a serious disease can be sold only by prescription.<ref>[http://www.fda.gov/ora/compliance_ref/cpg/cpgdrg/cpg400-400.html Sec. 400.400 Conditions Under Which Homeopathic Drugs May be Marketed (CPG 7132.15)] Downloaded 26 April 2007.</ref> |
|||
In Australia, the sale of homeopathic products is regulated by the [[Therapeutic Goods Administration]].<ref>{{Cite web|date=2008-09-01|title=Regulation of homoeopathic and anthroposophic medicines in Australia|url=https://www.tga.gov.au/consultation/regulation-homoeopathic-and-anthroposophic-medicines-australia|access-date=2020-09-01|website=Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA)|language=en}}</ref> In 2015, the [[National Health and Medical Research Council]] of Australia concluded that there is "no reliable evidence that homeopathy is effective and should not be used to treat health conditions that are chronic, serious, or could become serious". They recommended anyone considering using homeopathy should first get advice from a registered health practitioner.<ref name="NHMRC2" /> A 2017 review into Pharmacy Remuneration and Regulation recommended that products be banned from pharmacies;<ref>{{Cite web|date=2017|title=Review of Pharmacy Remuneration and Regulation Final Report|url=https://www1.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/content/7E5846EB2D7BA299CA257F5C007C0E21/$File/review-of-pharmacy-remuneration-and-regulation-final-report.pdf|access-date=September 1, 2020|archive-date=March 4, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210304103416/https://www1.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/content/7E5846EB2D7BA299CA257F5C007C0E21/$File/review-of-pharmacy-remuneration-and-regulation-final-report.pdf}}</ref> while noting the concerns the government did not adopt the recommendation.<ref>{{Cite web|date=2018|title=AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENT RESPONSE TO THE REVIEW OF PHARMACY REMUNERATION AND REGULATION|url=https://www1.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/content/7E5846EB2D7BA299CA257F5C007C0E21/%24File/Pharmacy-Review-Aus-Gov-Response-3-May-2018.pdf|access-date=September 1, 2020|archive-date=March 3, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210303041051/https://www1.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/content/7E5846EB2D7BA299CA257F5C007C0E21/$File/Pharmacy-Review-Aus-Gov-Response-3-May-2018.pdf}}</ref> In New Zealand there are no regulations specific to homeopathy<ref>{{Cite web|title=Natural health products|url=https://www.health.govt.nz/our-work/regulation-health-and-disability-system/natural-health-products|access-date=2020-09-01|website=Ministry of Health NZ|language=en}}</ref> and the [[New Zealand Medical Association]] does not oppose the use of homeopathy,<ref>{{Cite web|date=2017|title=Doctors and CAM (complementary and alternative medicine)|url=https://www.mcnz.org.nz/assets/standards/7eb60db2d2/Doctors-and-CAM-Complementary-and-alternative-medicine.pdf|website=MEDICAL COUNCIL OF NEW ZEALAND|access-date=September 1, 2020|archive-date=January 29, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210129025723/https://www.mcnz.org.nz/assets/standards/7eb60db2d2/Doctors-and-CAM-Complementary-and-alternative-medicine.pdf}}</ref> a stance that has been called unethical by some doctors.<ref>{{cite journal|last=Holt|first=Shaun|author2=Gilbey, Andrew|author3=Colquhoun|author4=David|author5=Baum, Michael|author6=Ernst, Edzard|date=15 April 2011|title=Call for doctors not to practice homeopathy or refer to homeopaths|journal=New Zealand Medical Journal|volume=124|issue=1332|pages=87–88|pmid=21747430|issn=1175-8716}}</ref> |
|||
A memorandum written in 1985 by attorneys for the American Association of Homeopathic Manufacturers, describes a meeting between the AAHP attorneys and high-ranking FDA officials to discuss whether homeopathic products must be proven effective to remain legally marketable.<ref name"1985_memorandum">[http://www.homeowatch.org/reg/meeting.html Meeting between FDA Officials and Homeopathic Pharmacists (1985)]. Memorandum, February 12, 1985</ref> Such negotiations led to the issuance in 1988 (revised in 1995) of an ''FDA Compliance Policy Guide'' that permits homeopathic products "intended solely for self-limiting disease conditions amenable to self-diagnosis (of symptoms) and treatment" to be marketed as nonprescription drugs.<ref name="compliance_guide">[http://www.fda.gov/ora/compliance_ref/cpg/cpgdrg/cpg400-400.html Compliance Policy Guide (CPG 7132.15). Conditions Under Which Homeopathic Drugs May be Marketed. Revised March 1995]</ref> |
|||
=== Prevalence === |
|||
In 2001, the FDA published a comprehensive review of mercury compounds in homeopathic drugs. This report indicated that nearly all examined compounds derived from the use of mercury. However, due to the extreme dilution of materials, the presence of mercury in the finished product would be minimal.<ref name="mercury">[http://www.fda.gov/cder/fdama/mercuryreport.htm Report on Mercury Compounds in Drugs]MERCURY COMPOUNDS IN DRUGS AND FOOD FDA/Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Last Updated: August 09, 2001</ref> |
|||
Homeopathy is one of the most commonly used forms of alternative medicines and it has a large worldwide market.<ref name="WHO Safety" /> The exact size is uncertain, but information available on homeopathic sales suggests it forms a large share of the medical market.<ref name="WHO Safety" /> |
|||
At present the FDA Health Fraud Division only pursues claims which may cause direct harm to consumers through their use. Homeopathic drugs, largely regarded as equivalent to placebos, are not considered under these guidelines. Due to the significant dilution of the products, the agents become practically immeasurable: the harmful effects of homeopathic drugs is more likely to be that patients avoid conventional treatments.<ref name="IHF">[http://www.fda.gov/cder/Offices/DNDLC/hfimain.htm Internet Health and Fraud Site, US Food and Drug Administration]US FDA Internet Site, 2007</ref> |
|||
In 1999, about 1000 UK doctors practiced homeopathy, most being general practitioners who prescribe a limited number of remedies. A further 1500 homeopaths with no medical training are also thought to practice. Over ten thousand German and French doctors use homeopathy.<ref name="Vickers 1115–11182" /> In the United States a National Health Interview Survey estimated 5 million adults and 1 million children used homeopathy in 2011. An analysis of this survey concluded that most cases were self-prescribed for colds and musculoskeletal pain.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Homeopathy|url=https://www.nccih.nih.gov/health/homeopathy|access-date=2020-09-02|website=NCCIH|language=en}}</ref> Major retailers like [[Walmart]], [[CVS Pharmacy|CVS]], and [[Walgreens]] sell homeopathic products that are packaged to resemble conventional medicines.<ref name="Undark 2020-09-02" /> |
|||
=== Germany === |
|||
In Germany about 6,000 physicians specialize in homeopathy. In [[1978]] homeopathy, [[Anthroposophy|anthroposophically extended medicine]] and [[herbalism]], were recognized as "special forms of therapy", meaning that their medications are freed from the usual requirement of proving efficacy. Since January 1, 2004 homeopathic medications, with some exceptions, are no longer covered by the country's public health insurance.<ref>[http://www.dhu.de/wc_800/archiv/GMG.shtml Gesundheitssystem: Was bringt das neue Gesetz?] (in German)</ref> |
|||
The homeopathic drug market in Germany is worth about 650 million euro with a 2014 survey finding that 60 percent of Germans reported trying homeopathy.<ref name="Undark 2020-09-02" /> A 2009 survey found that only 17 percent of respondents knew how homeopathic medicine was made.<ref name="Undark 2020-09-02" /> France spent more than US$408 million on homeopathic products in 2008.<ref name="WHO Safety" /> In the United States the homeopathic market is worth about $3 billion-a-year;<ref>{{Cite web|last=Fox|first=Maggie|date=2017|title=Homeopathic products useless and often even harmful, FDA says|url=https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/fda-crack-down-snake-oil-homeopathy-n830756|access-date=2020-09-04|website=NBC News|language=en}}</ref> with 2.9 billion spent in 2007.<ref name="WHO Safety" /> Australia spent US$7.3 million on homeopathic medicines in 2008.<ref name="WHO Safety" /> |
|||
=== Switzerland === |
|||
In [[Switzerland]], homeopathic medications were formerly covered by the basic health insurance system, if prescribed by a physician. This ended in June 2005. The [[Swiss]] Government, after a 5-year trial, withdrew insurance coverage for homeopathy and four other complementary treatments, claiming that they did not meet efficacy and cost-effectiveness criteria. This change applied only to compulsory insurance; homeopathy and other complementary medicine is covered by additional insurance, if the treatment is provided by a medical doctor.<ref>[http://www.kaufmann-net.ch/ Bundesratsentscheid über die Leistungen für Alternativmedizin: Information about Homeopathy in [[Switzerland]] by Vera Kaufmann, BHSc.Hom.] (in German)</ref> |
|||
In India, a 2014 national health survey found that homeopathy was used by about 3% of the population.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Rudra |first1=Shalini |last2=Kalra |first2=Aakshi |last3=Kumar |first3=Abhishek |last4=Joe |first4=William |date=2017 |title=Utilization of alternative systems of medicine as health care services in India: Evidence on AYUSH care from NSS 2014 |journal=PLOS ONE |volume=12|issue=5 |pages=e0176916 |doi=10.1371/journal.pone.0176916 |pmid=28472197 |pmc=5417584 |bibcode=2017PLoSO..1276916R |doi-access=free }}</ref> Homeopathy is used in China, although it arrived a lot later than in many other countries, partly due to the restriction on foreigners that persisted until late in the nineteenth century.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Lu|first=Di|date=2019-09-20|title='Homoeopathy flourishes in the far East': A forgotten history of homeopathy in late nineteenth-century China|url=https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsnr.2018.0041|journal=Notes and Records: The Royal Society Journal of the History of Science|volume=73|issue=3|pages=329–351|doi=10.1098/rsnr.2018.0041|s2cid=80714173}}</ref> Throughout Africa there is a high reliance on traditional medicines, which can be attributed to the cost of modern medicines and the relative prevalence of practitioners. Many African countries do not have any official training facilities.<ref name="Who Legal" /> |
|||
==Veterinary use== |
|||
[[File:Homeopathic cures for small animals.jpg|thumb|Homeopathic cures for small animals on the [[Isle of Man]]]] |
|||
Using homeopathy as a treatment for animals is termed "veterinary homeopathy" and dates back to the inception of homeopathy; Hahnemann himself wrote and spoke of the use of homeopathy in animals other than humans.<ref name="Saxton2007">{{cite journal|last1=Saxton|first1=J|year=2007|title=The diversity of veterinary homeopathy|journal=Homeopathy|volume=96|issue=1|page=3|doi=10.1016/j.homp.2006.11.010|pmid=17227741|s2cid=3715861}}</ref> The use of homeopathy in the [[organic farming]] industry is heavily promoted.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Doehring|first1=C.|last2=Sundrum|first2=A.|date=2016-12-17|title=Efficacy of homeopathy in livestock according to peer-reviewed publications from 1981 to 2014|journal=The Veterinary Record|volume=179|issue=24|page=628|doi=10.1136/vr.103779|issn=0042-4900|pmc=5256414|pmid=27956476}}</ref> Given that homeopathy's effects in humans are due to the placebo effect and the counseling aspects of the consultation, such treatments are even less effective in animals.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Lees|first1=P.|last2=Pelligand|first2=L.|last3=Whiting|first3=M.|last4=Chambers|first4=D.|last5=Toutain|first5=P-L.|last6=Whitehead|first6=M.L.|date=2017-08-19|title=Comparison of veterinary drugs and veterinary homeopathy: part 2|journal=[[The Veterinary Record]]|volume=181|issue=8|pages=198–207|doi=10.1136/vr.104279|issn=0042-4900|pmc=5738588|pmid=28821700|quote=In human medicine, there may be a place for the counselling/psychotherapeutic aspects of homeopathic consults and the placebo effects generated by homeopathic products in patients who believe in such treatments, but in veterinary medicine these factors are unlikely to benefit patients, and the use of homeopathic products in veterinary medicine is contrary to best evidence, irrational, and inconsistent with current scientific and medical knowledge}}</ref> Studies have also found that giving animals placebos can play active roles in influencing pet owners to believe in the effectiveness of the treatment when none exists.<ref name="Hektoen" /> This means that animals given homeopathic remedies will continue to suffer, resulting in [[animal welfare]] concerns.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Lees|first1=P.|last2=Pelligand|first2=L.|last3=Whiting|first3=M.|last4=Chambers|first4=D.|last5=Toutain|first5=P-L.|last6=Whitehead|first6=M. L.|date=2017-08-12|title=Comparison of veterinary drugs and veterinary homeopathy: part 1|journal=The Veterinary Record|volume=181|issue=7|pages=170–176|doi=10.1136/vr.104278|issn=0042-4900|pmc=5738587|pmid=28801498}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Whitehead|first1=M L|last2=Lees|first2=P|last3=Toutain|first3=P L|date=2018|title=Veterinary homeopathy regulation in the UK – a cause for concern.|url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/329152074|journal=Regulatory Rapporteur|volume=15|pages=21–25}}</ref> |
|||
Little existing research on the subject is of a high enough scientific standard to provide reliable data on efficacy.<ref name="Hektoen">{{cite journal|last1=Hektoen|first1=L|year=2005|title=Review of the current involvement of homeopathy in veterinary practice and research|journal=[[Veterinary Record]]|volume=157|issue=8|pages=224–29|doi=10.1136/vr.157.8.224|pmid=16113167|s2cid=12525634}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|last1=Mathie|first1=RT|last2=Clausen|first2=J|date=October 18, 2014|title=Veterinary homeopathy: systematic review of medical conditions studied by randomised placebo-controlled trials|journal=The Veterinary Record|volume=175|issue=15|pages=373–81|doi=10.1136/vr.101767|pmid=25324413|s2cid=22894207}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|last1=Mathie|first1=RT|last2=Clausen|first2=J|date=September 15, 2015|title=Veterinary homeopathy: systematic review of medical conditions studied by randomised trials controlled by other than placebo.|journal=[[BMC Veterinary Research]]|volume=11|page=236|doi=10.1186/s12917-015-0542-2|pmc=4570221|pmid=26371366 |doi-access=free }}</ref> A 2016 review of peer-reviewed articles from 1981 to 2014 by scientists from the [[University of Kassel]], Germany, concluded that there is not enough evidence to support homeopathy as an effective treatment of infectious diseases in livestock.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Doehring|first1=C.|last2=Sundrum|first2=A.|date=December 12, 2016|title=Efficacy of homeopathy in livestock according to peer-reviewed publications from 1981 to 2014|journal=Veterinary Record|language=en|volume=179|issue=24|pages=vetrec–2016–103779|doi=10.1136/vr.103779|issn=2042-7670|pmc=5256414|pmid=27956476}}</ref> The UK's [[Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs]] (Defra) has adopted a robust position against use of "alternative" pet preparations including homeopathy.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.gov.uk/government/news/alternative-pet-remedies-government-clampdown |title=Alternative pet remedies: Government clampdown}}</ref> The British Veterinary Association's position statement on alternative medicines says that it "cannot endorse" homeopathy,<ref name="BVA">{{cite web|title=Veterinary medicines|url=http://www.bva.co.uk/News-campaigns-and-policy/Policy/Medicines/Veterinary-medicines/|access-date=January 5, 2015|publisher=British Veterinary Association}}</ref> and the Australian Veterinary Association includes it on its list of "ineffective therapies".<ref name="AVA">{{cite web|title=Ineffective therapies|url=http://www.ava.com.au/12057|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150207080041/http://www.ava.com.au/12057|archive-date=February 7, 2015|access-date=January 5, 2015|publisher=Australian veterinary association}}</ref> |
|||
==See also== |
==See also== |
||
* [[Fringe science]] |
|||
*[[List of important homeopaths]] |
|||
*[[List of |
* [[List of topics characterized as pseudoscience]] |
||
*[[ |
* [[Scientific skepticism]] |
||
*[[Hormesis]] |
|||
*[[Alternative medicine]] |
|||
==References== |
==References== |
||
{{Reflist| refs= |
|||
{{reflist}} |
|||
<ref name="Hahnemann">{{cite book |title=The homœopathic medical doctrine, or "Organon of the healing art" |publisher=W. F. Wakeman |author=Hahnemann, Samuel |author-link=Samuel Hahnemann |year=1833 |location=Dublin |pages=[https://books.google.com/books?id=EnEFAAAAQAAJ&pg=PR3 iii], [https://books.google.com/books?id=EnEFAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA48 48–49] |quote=Observation, reflection, and experience have unfolded to me that the best and true method of cure is founded on the principle, ''[[similia similibus curentur]]''. To cure in a mild, prompt, safe, and durable manner, it is necessary to choose in each case a medicine that will excite an affection similar (''{{lang|el|ὅμοιος πάθος}}'') to that against which it is employed.}} Translator: Charles H. Devrient, Esq.</ref> |
|||
<ref name="Holmes"> |
|||
{{cite book |
|||
|author=Oliver Wendell Holmes Sr. |
|||
|title=Homoeopathy and its kindred delusions: Two lectures delivered before the Boston Society for the Diffusion of Useful Knowledge |
|||
|url=https://archive.org/details/64340260R.nlm.nih.gov |
|||
|location=Boston |
|||
|year=1842 |
|||
|author-link=Oliver Wendell Holmes Sr |
|||
}} as reprinted in |
|||
{{cite book |
|||
|author=Oliver Wendell Holmes Sr. |
|||
|title=Currents and counter-currents in medical science |
|||
|year=1861 |
|||
|publisher=Ticknor and Fields |
|||
|pages=72–188 |
|||
|url=https://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/011611362 |
|||
|oclc=1544161 |
|||
|ol=14731800M |
|||
|author-link=Oliver Wendell Holmes Sr |
|||
}}</ref> |
|||
<ref name="Time19951125">{{cite news |vauthors=Toufexis A, Cole W, Hallanan DB |url=http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,983466,00.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090614091356/http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,983466,00.html |archive-date=June 14, 2009 |title=Is homeopathy good medicine? |magazine=[[Time (magazine)|Time]] |date=September 25, 1995}}</ref> |
|||
<ref name="shang">{{cite journal |last1=Shang |first1=Aijing |last2=Huwiler-Müntener |first2=Karin |last3=Nartey |first3=Linda |last4=Jüni |first4=Peter |last5=Dörig |first5=Stephan |last6=Sterne |first6=Jonathan AC |last7=Pewsner |first7=Daniel |last8=Egger |first8=Matthias |title=Are the clinical effects of homoeopathy placebo effects? Comparative study of placebo-controlled trials of homoeopathy and allopathy |journal=The Lancet |volume=366 |pages=726–32 |year=2005 |doi=10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67177-2 |pmid=16125589 |issue=9487|s2cid=17939264 }}</ref> |
|||
<ref name="J Toxicology: Arsenic toxicity">{{cite journal |last1=Chakraborti |first1=D |last2=Mukherjee |first2=SC |last3=Saha |first3=KC |last4=Chowdhury |first4=UK |last5=Rahman |first5=MM |last6=Sengupta |first6=MK |title=Arsenic toxicity from homeopathic treatment |journal=Journal of Toxicology. Clinical Toxicology |volume=41 |issue=7 |pages=963–67 |year=2003 |pmid=14705842 |doi=10.1081/CLT-120026518|s2cid=25453468 }}</ref> |
|||
<ref name="Mayo Clinic Proceedings: trials">{{cite journal |last1=Altunc |first1=U. |last2=Pittler |first2=M. H. |last3=Ernst |first3=E |title=Homeopathy for childhood and adolescence ailments: systematic review of randomized clinical trials |journal=Mayo Clinic Proceedings |volume=82 |issue=1 |pages=69–75 |year=2007 |pmid=17285788 |doi=10.4065/82.1.69 |quote=However, homeopathy is not totally devoid of risks... it may delay effective treatment or diagnosis|citeseerx=10.1.1.456.5352 }}</ref> |
|||
== External links == |
|||
<ref name="pmid8554846">{{cite journal |last1=Ernst |first1=E |author-link=Edzard Ernst |last2=White |first2=AR |title=Homoeopathy and immunization |journal=The British Journal of General Practice |volume=45 |issue=400 |pages=629–30 |year=1995 |pmid=8554846 |pmc=1239445}}</ref> |
|||
}} |
|||
* [http://nccam.net/health/homeopathy/ Homeopathy] National Institute of Health - Fact Sheet |
|||
* [http://www.fda.gov/fdac/features/096_home.html FDA's view of homeopathy] |
|||
* [http://www.bbc.co.uk/health/healthy_living/complementary_medicine/therapies_homeopathy.shtml Complementary Medicine - Therapies: Homeopathy] BBC's "Complementary Medicine" article on Homeopathy |
|||
* [http://www.acampbell.org.uk/homeopathy/index.html Homeopathy In Perspective] — critical online book, covering the history and present state of homeopathy |
|||
* [http://www.myhomeopathic.com/ Pro homeopathy website discussing Homeopathy] |
|||
* [http://www.abchomeopathy.com/ Online homeopathic remedy Finder, Materia Medica, Discussion Forum, and Practitioner Directory] |
|||
* [http://www.theness.com/articles.asp?id=6 A critical Overview] By [[Steven Novella]] |
|||
* [http://www.homeowatch.org/ HomeoWatch] — A Skeptical Guide to Homeopathic History, Theories, and Current Practices |
|||
* [http://www.homeopathic.com/articles/view,19 A condensed history of homeopathy] |
|||
* [http://www.acsh.org/search/txtQuickSearch.homeopathy/health_result.asp "The Scientific Evidence on Homeopathy"] - Critical article from the American Council on Science and Health |
|||
* [http://www.skepdic.com/homeo.html The Skeptics Dictionary entry on homeopathy] |
|||
* [http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=2785985155605802136&q=James+Randi James Randi Explains Homeopathy] - Video |
|||
* [http://www.colorado.edu/philosophy/vstenger/Medicine/Homeop.html HOMEOPATHY AND SCIENCE: A CLOSER LOOK] - Article explaining history, philosophy and scientific studies of homeopathic treatments. Published in The Technology Journal of the Franklin Institute. |
|||
* [http://altmed.creighton.edu/Homeopathy/history.htm Altmed.creighton.edu] - Information about homeopathy including history, philosophy and procedures from [[Creighton University]]. |
|||
==External links== |
|||
{{commons category}} |
|||
{{EB1911 poster|Homoeopathy}} |
|||
* [https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/homeopathy/ Homeopathy] ([[NHS Choices]], UK) |
|||
{{Homoeopathy}} |
{{Homoeopathy}} |
||
{{pseudoscience}} |
|||
{{Authority control}} |
|||
[[Category:Alternative medical systems]] |
|||
[[Category:Alternative medicine]] |
|||
[[Category:Homeopathy| |
[[Category:Homeopathy| ]] |
||
[[Category:Pseudoscience]] |
[[Category:Pseudoscience]] |
||
[[Category:Obsolete medical theories]] |
[[Category:Obsolete medical theories]] |
||
[[Category: |
[[Category:1796 introductions]] |
||
[[Category:Health fraud]] |
|||
[[bg:Хомеопатия]] |
|||
[[ca:Homeopatia]] |
|||
[[cs:Homeopatie]] |
|||
[[da:Homøopati]] |
|||
[[de:Homöopathie]] |
|||
[[el:Ομοιοπαθητική]] |
|||
[[eo:Homeopatio]] |
|||
[[es:Homeopatía]] |
|||
[[et:Homöopaatia]] |
|||
[[fi:Homeopatia]] |
|||
[[fr:Homéopathie]] |
|||
[[gl:Homeopatía]] |
|||
[[he:הומאופתיה]] |
|||
[[hi:होम्योपैथी]] |
|||
[[hr:Homeopatija]] |
|||
[[hu:Homeopátia]] |
|||
[[it:Omeopatia]] |
|||
[[ja:ホメオパシー]] |
|||
[[lt:Homeopatija]] |
|||
[[nl:Homeopathie]] |
|||
[[no:Homøopati]] |
|||
[[pl:Homeopatia]] |
|||
[[pt:Homeopatia]] |
|||
[[ro:Homeopatie]] |
|||
[[ru:Гомеопатия]] |
|||
[[sk:Homeopatia]] |
|||
[[sl:Homeopatija]] |
|||
[[sv:Homeopati]] |
|||
[[te:హొమియోపతీ]] |
|||
[[ur:معالجہ المثلیہ]] |
|||
[[uz:Homeopathy]] |
|||
[[zh:顺势疗法]] |
Latest revision as of 19:20, 4 November 2024
Alternative medicine | |
---|---|
Homoeopathy | |
Pronunciation | |
Claims | "Like cures like", dilution increases potency, disease caused by miasms |
Related fields | Alternative medicine |
Original proponents | Samuel Hahnemann |
Subsequent proponents | |
MeSH | D006705 |
See also | Humorism, heroic medicine |
This article is part of a series on |
Alternative medicine |
---|
Homeopathy or homoeopathy is a pseudoscientific[1] system of alternative medicine. It was conceived in 1796 by the German physician Samuel Hahnemann. Its practitioners, called homeopaths or homeopathic physicians,[2] believe that a substance that causes symptoms of a disease in healthy people can cure similar symptoms in sick people; this doctrine is called similia similibus curentur, or "like cures like".[3] Homeopathic preparations are termed remedies and are made using homeopathic dilution. In this process, the selected substance is repeatedly diluted until the final product is chemically indistinguishable from the diluent. Often not even a single molecule of the original substance can be expected to remain in the product.[4] Between each dilution homeopaths may hit and/or shake the product, claiming this makes the diluent "remember" the original substance after its removal. Practitioners claim that such preparations, upon oral intake, can treat or cure disease.[5]
All relevant scientific knowledge about physics, chemistry, biochemistry and biology contradicts homeopathy.[6] Homeopathic remedies are typically biochemically inert, and have no effect on any known disease.[7][8][9] Its theory of disease, centered around principles Hahnemann termed miasms, is inconsistent with subsequent identification of viruses and bacteria as causes of disease. Clinical trials have been conducted and generally demonstrated no objective effect from homeopathic preparations.[10][11][12]: 206 [13] The fundamental implausibility of homeopathy as well as a lack of demonstrable effectiveness has led to it being characterized within the scientific and medical communities as quackery and fraud.[14][15][16]
Homeopathy achieved its greatest popularity in the 19th century. It was introduced to the United States in 1825, and the first American homeopathic school opened in 1835. Throughout the 19th century, dozens of homeopathic institutions appeared in Europe and the United States. During this period, homeopathy was able to appear relatively successful, as other forms of treatment could be harmful and ineffective. By the end of the century the practice began to wane, with the last exclusively homeopathic medical school in the United States closing in 1920. During the 1970s, homeopathy made a significant comeback, with sales of some homeopathic products increasing tenfold. The trend corresponded with the rise of the New Age movement, and may be in part due to chemophobia, an irrational aversion to synthetic chemicals, and the longer consultation times homeopathic practitioners provided.
In the 21st century, a series of meta-analyses have shown that the therapeutic claims of homeopathy lack scientific justification. As a result, national and international bodies have recommended the withdrawal of government funding for homeopathy in healthcare. National bodies from Australia, the United Kingdom, Switzerland and France, as well as the European Academies' Science Advisory Council and the Russian Academy of Sciences have all concluded that homeopathy is ineffective, and recommended against the practice receiving any further funding.[17][18][19][20] The National Health Service in England no longer provides funding for homeopathic remedies and asked the Department of Health to add homeopathic remedies to the list of forbidden prescription items.[21][22][23] France removed funding in 2021,[24][25] while Spain has also announced moves to ban homeopathy and other pseudotherapies from health centers.[26]
History
Homeopathy was created in 1796 by Samuel Hahnemann.[27] Hahnemann rejected the mainstream medicine of the late 18th century as irrational and inadvisable, because it was largely ineffective and often harmful.[28][29] He advocated the use of single drugs at lower doses and promoted an immaterial, vitalistic view of how living organisms function.[30] The term homeopathy was coined by Hahnemann and first appeared in print in 1807.[31] He also coined the expression "allopathic medicine", which was used to pejoratively refer to traditional Western medicine.[32]
Concept
Hahnemann conceived of homeopathy while translating a medical treatise by the Scottish physician and chemist William Cullen into German. Being sceptical of Cullen's theory that cinchona cured malaria because it was bitter, Hahnemann ingested some bark specifically to investigate what would happen. He experienced fever, shivering and joint pain: symptoms similar to those of malaria itself. From this, Hahnemann came to believe that all effective drugs produce symptoms in healthy individuals similar to those of the diseases that they treat.[33] This led to the name "homeopathy", which comes from the ‹See Tfd›Greek: ὅμοιος hómoios, "-like" and πάθος páthos, "suffering".[34]
The doctrine that those drugs are effective which produce symptoms similar to the symptoms caused by the diseases they treat, called "the law of similars", was expressed by Hahnemann with the Latin phrase similia similibus curentur, or "like cures like".[3] Hahnemann's law of similars is unproven and does not derive from the scientific method.[35] An account of the effects of eating cinchona bark noted by Oliver Wendell Holmes, published in 1861, failed to reproduce the symptoms Hahnemann reported.[36]: 128 Subsequent scientific work showed that cinchona cures malaria because it contains quinine, which kills the Plasmodium falciparum parasite that causes the disease; the mechanism of action is unrelated to Hahnemann's ideas.[37]
Provings
Hahnemann began to test what effects various substances may produce in humans, a procedure later called "homeopathic proving". These tests required subjects to test the effects of ingesting substances by recording all their symptoms as well as the ancillary conditions under which they appeared.[38] He published a collection of provings in 1805, and a second collection of 65 preparations appeared in his book, Materia Medica Pura (1810).[39]
As Hahnemann believed that large doses of drugs that caused similar symptoms would only aggravate illness, he advocated for extreme dilutions. A technique was devised for making dilutions that Hahnemann claimed would preserve the substance's therapeutic properties while removing its harmful effects.[40] Hahnemann believed that this process enhanced "the spirit-like medicinal powers of the crude substances".[41] He gathered and published an overview of his new medical system in his book, The Organon of the Healing Art (1810), with a sixth edition published in 1921 that homeopaths still use today.[42]
Miasms and disease
In the Organon, Hahnemann introduced the concept of "miasms" as the "infectious principles" underlying chronic disease[43] and as "peculiar morbid derangement[s] of vital force".[44] Hahnemann associated each miasm with specific diseases, and thought that initial exposure to miasms causes local symptoms, such as skin or venereal diseases. His assertion was that if these symptoms were suppressed by medication, the cause went deeper and began to manifest itself as diseases of the internal organs.[45] Homeopathy maintains that treating diseases by directly alleviating their symptoms, as is sometimes done in conventional medicine, is ineffective because all "disease can generally be traced to some latent, deep-seated, underlying chronic, or inherited tendency".[46] The underlying imputed miasm still remains, and deep-seated ailments can be corrected only by removing the deeper disturbance of the vital force.[47]
Hahnemann's hypotheses for miasms originally presented only three local symptoms: psora (the itch), syphilis (venereal disease) or sycosis (fig-wart disease).[48] Of these the most important was psora, described as being related to any itching diseases of the skin and was claimed to be the foundation of many further disease conditions. Hahnemann believed it to be the cause of such diseases as epilepsy, cancer, jaundice, deafness, and cataracts.[49] Since Hahnemann's time, other miasms have been proposed, some replacing illnesses previously attributed to the psora, including tuberculosis and cancer miasms.[45]
Hahnemann's miasm theory remains disputed and controversial within homeopathy even in modern times. The theory of miasms has been criticized as an explanation developed to preserve the system of homeopathy in the face of treatment failures, and for being inadequate to cover the many hundreds of sorts of diseases, as well as for failing to explain disease predispositions, as well as genetics, environmental factors, and the unique disease history of each patient.[12]: 148–9
19th century: rise to popularity and early criticism
Homeopathy achieved its greatest popularity in the 19th century. It was introduced to the United States in 1825 by Hans Birch Gram, a student of Hahnemann.[50] The first homeopathic school in the United States opened in 1835 and the American Institute of Homeopathy was established in 1844. Throughout the 19th century, dozens of homeopathic institutions appeared in Europe and the United States,[51] and by 1900, there were 22 homeopathic colleges and 15,000 practitioners in the United States.[52]
Because medical practice of the time relied on treatments which were often ineffective and harmful, patients of homeopaths often had better outcomes than those being treated by medical practitioners.[53] Though ineffective, homeopathic preparations are rarely detrimental, thus users are less likely to be harmed by the treatment that is supposed to be helping them.[42] The relative success of homeopathy in the 19th century may have led to the abandonment of the ineffective and harmful treatments of bloodletting and purging and begun the move towards more effective, science-based medicine.[54] One reason for the growing popularity of homeopathy was its apparent success in treating people suffering from infectious disease epidemics.[55] During 19th-century epidemics of diseases such as cholera, death rates in homeopathic hospitals were often lower than in conventional hospitals, where the treatments used at the time were often harmful and did little or nothing to combat the diseases.[56]
Even during its rise in popularity, homeopathy was criticized by scientists and physicians. Sir John Forbes, physician to Queen Victoria, said in 1843 that the extremely small doses of homeopathy were regularly derided as useless and considered it "an outrage to human reason".[57] James Young Simpson said in 1853 of the highly diluted drugs: "No poison, however strong or powerful, the billionth or decillionth of which would in the least degree affect a man or harm a fly."[58] Nineteenth-century American physician and author Oliver Wendell Holmes was also a vocal critic of homeopathy and published an essay entitled Homœopathy and Its Kindred Delusions (1842).[36] The members of the French Homeopathic Society observed in 1867 that some leading homeopaths of Europe not only were abandoning the practice of administering infinitesimal doses but were also no longer defending it.[59] The last school in the United States exclusively teaching homeopathy closed in 1920.[42]
Revival in the 20th century
According to academics Paul U. Unschuld and Edzard Ernst, the Nazi regime in Germany was fond of homeopathy, and spent large sums of money on researching its mechanisms, but without gaining a positive result.[60] Unschuld also states that homeopathy never subsequently took root in the United States, but remained more deeply established in European thinking.[61] In the United States, the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act of 1938 (sponsored by Royal Copeland, a Senator from New York and homeopathic physician) recognized homeopathic preparations as drugs. In the 1950s, there were only 75 solely homeopathic practitioners in the U.S.[62] By the mid to late 1970s, homeopathy made a significant comeback and the sales of some homeopathic companies increased tenfold.[63]
Some homeopaths credit the revival to Greek homeopath George Vithoulkas, who conducted a "great deal of research to update the scenarios and refine the theories and practice of homeopathy" in the 1970s,[64][65] but Ernst and Simon Singh consider it to be linked to the rise of the New Age movement.[29] Bruce Hood has argued that the increased popularity of homeopathy in recent times may be due to the comparatively long consultations practitioners are willing to give their patients, and to a preference for "natural" products, which people think are the basis of homeopathic preparations.[66]
Towards the end of the century opposition to homeopathy began to increase again; with William T. Jarvis, the President of the National Council Against Health Fraud, saying that "Homeopathy is a fraud perpetrated on the public with the government's blessing, thanks to the abuse of political power of Sen. Royal S. Copeland."[67]
21st century: renewed criticism
Since the beginning of the 21st century, a series of meta-analyses have further shown that the therapeutic claims of homeopathy lack scientific justification.[68] This had led to a decrease or suspension of funding by many governments. In a 2010 report, the Science and Technology Committee of the United Kingdom House of Commons recommended that homeopathy should no longer receive National Health Service (NHS) funding due its lack of scientific credibility;[68] NHS funding for homeopathy ceased in 2017.[22] They also asked the Department of Health in the UK to add homeopathic remedies to the list of forbidden prescription items.[23]
In 2015, the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia found that "there are no health conditions for which there is reliable evidence that homeopathy is effective".[69] The federal government only ended up accepting three of the 45 recommendations made by the 2018 review of Pharmacy Remuneration and Regulation.[70] The same year the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) held a hearing requesting public comment on the regulation of homeopathic drugs.[71] In 2017 the FDA announced it would strengthen regulation of homeopathic products.[72]
The American non-profit Center for Inquiry (CFI) filed a lawsuit in 2018 against the CVS pharmacy for consumer fraud over its sale of homeopathic medicines.[73] It claimed that CVS was selling homeopathic products on an easier-to-obtain basis than standard medication.[74] In 2019, CFI brought a similar lawsuit against Walmart for "committing wide-scale consumer fraud and endangering the health of its customers through its sale and marketing of homeopathic medicines".[75][76] They also conducted a survey in which they found consumers felt ripped off when informed of the lack of evidence for the efficacy of homeopathic remedies, such as those sold by Walmart and CVS.[77][78]
In 2021, the French healthcare minister phased out social security reimbursements for homeopathic drugs.[24][25] France has long had a stronger belief in the virtues of homeopathic drugs than many other countries and the world's biggest manufacturer of alternative medicine drugs, Boiron, is located in that country.[79] Spain has also announced moves to ban homeopathy and other pseudotherapies.[26] In 2016, the University of Barcelona cancelled its master's degree in Homeopathy citing "lack of scientific basis", after advice from the Spanish Ministry of Health.[80] Shortly afterwards the University of Valencia announced the elimination of its Masters in Homeopathy.[81]
Preparations and treatment
Homeopathic preparations are referred to as "homeopathic remedies".[82] Practitioners rely on two types of reference when prescribing: Materia medica and repertories. A homeopathic materia medica is a collection of "drug pictures", organized alphabetically. A homeopathic repertory is a quick reference version of the materia medica that indexes the symptoms and then the associated remedies for each. In both cases different compilers may dispute particular inclusions in the references.[83] The first symptomatic homeopathic materia medica was arranged by Hahnemann. The first homeopathic repertory was Georg Jahr's Symptomenkodex, published in German in 1835, and translated into English as the Repertory to the more Characteristic Symptoms of Materia Medica in 1838. This version was less focused on disease categories and was the forerunner to later works by James Tyler Kent.[84][85] There are over 118 repertories published in English, with Kent's being one of the most used.[86]
Consultation
Homeopaths generally begin with a consultation, which can be a 10–15 minute appointment or last for over an hour, where the patient describes their medical history. The patient describes the "modalities", or if their symptoms change depending on the weather and other external factors.[87] The practitioner also solicits information on mood, likes and dislikes, physical, mental and emotional states, life circumstances, and any physical or emotional illnesses.[88] This information (also called the "symptom picture") is matched to the "drug picture" in the materia medica or repertory and used to determine the appropriate homeopathic remedies. In classical homeopathy, the practitioner attempts to match a single preparation to the totality of symptoms (the simlilum), while "clinical homeopathy" involves combinations of preparations based on the illness's symptoms.[64]
Preparation
Homeopathy uses animal, plant, mineral, and synthetic substances in its preparations, generally referring to them using Latin names.[89] Examples include arsenicum album (arsenic oxide), natrum muriaticum (sodium chloride or table salt), Lachesis muta (the venom of the bushmaster snake), opium, and thyroidinum (thyroid hormone). Homeopaths say this is to ensure accuracy.[90] In the USA the common name must be displayed, although the Latin one can also be present.[89] Homeopathic pills are made from an inert substance (often sugars, typically lactose), upon which a drop of liquid homeopathic preparation is placed and allowed to evaporate.[91][92]
Isopathy is a therapy derived from homeopathy in which the preparations come from diseased or pathological products such as fecal, urinary and respiratory discharges, blood, and tissue.[84] They are called nosodes (from the Greek nosos, disease) with preparations made from "healthy" specimens being termed "sarcodes". Many so-called "homeopathic vaccines" are a form of isopathy.[93] Tautopathy is a form of isopathy where the preparations are composed of drugs or vaccines that a person has consumed in the past, in the belief that this can reverse the supposed lingering damage caused by the initial use.[94] There is no convincing scientific evidence for isopathy as an effective method of treatment.[95]
Some modern homeopaths use preparations they call "imponderables" because they do not originate from a substance but some other phenomenon presumed to have been "captured" by alcohol or lactose. Examples include X-rays[96] and sunlight.[97] Another derivative is electrohomeopathy, where an electric bio-energy of therapeutic value is supposedly extracted from plants. Popular in the late nineteenth century, electrohomeopathy is extremely pseudo-scientific.[98] In 2012, the Allahabad High Court in Uttar Pradesh, India, handed down a decree stating that electrohomeopathy was quackery and no longer recognized it as a system of medicine.[99]
Other minority practices include paper preparations, in which the terms for substances and dilutions are written on pieces of paper and either pinned to the patients' clothing, put in their pockets, or placed under glasses of water that are then given to the patients. Radionics, the use of electromagnetic radiation such as radio waves, can also be used to manufacture preparations. Such practices have been strongly criticized by classical homeopaths as unfounded, speculative, and verging upon magic and superstition.[100][101] Flower preparations are produced by placing flowers in water and exposing them to sunlight. The most famous of these are the Bach flower remedies, which were developed by Edward Bach.[102]
Dilutions
Hahnemann claimed that undiluted doses caused reactions, sometimes dangerous ones, and thus that preparations be given at the lowest possible dose.[103] A solution that is more dilute is described as having a higher "potency", and thus are claimed to be stronger and deeper-acting.[104] The general method of dilution is serial dilution, where solvent is added to part of the previous mixture, but the "Korsakovian" method may also be used. In the Korsakovian method, the vessel in which the preparations are manufactured is emptied, refilled with solvent, with the volume of fluid adhering to the walls of the vessel deemed sufficient for the new batch.[12]: 270 The Korsakovian method is sometimes referred to as K on the label of a homeopathic preparation.[105][106] Another method is Fluxion, which dilutes the substance by continuously passing water through the vial.[107] Insoluble solids, such as granite, diamond, and platinum, are diluted by grinding them with lactose ("trituration").[12]: 23
Three main logarithmic dilution scales are in regular use in homeopathy. Hahnemann created the "centesimal" or "C scale", diluting a substance by a factor of 100 at each stage. There is also a decimal dilution scale (notated as "X" or "D") in which the preparation is diluted by a factor of 10 at each stage.[108] The centesimal scale was favoured by Hahnemann for most of his life, although in his last ten years Hahnemann developed a quintamillesimal (Q) scale which diluted the drug 1 part in 50,000.[109] A 2C dilution works out to one part of the original substance in 10,000 parts of the solution. In standard chemistry, this produces a substance with a concentration of 0.01% (volume-volume percentage). A 6C dilution ends up with the original substance diluted by a factor of 100−6 (one part in one trillion). The end product is usually so diluted as to be indistinguishable from the diluent (pure water, sugar or alcohol).[40][110] The greatest dilution reasonably likely to contain at least one molecule of the original substance is approximately 12C.[111]
Hahnemann advocated dilutions of 1 part to 1060 or 30C.[112] Hahnemann regularly used dilutions of up to 30C but opined that "there must be a limit to the matter".[38]: 322 To counter the reduced potency at high dilutions he formed the view that vigorous shaking by striking on an elastic surface – a process termed succussion – was necessary.[103] Homeopaths are unable to agree on the number and force of strikes needed, and there is no way that the claimed results of succussion can be tested.[12]: 67–69
Critics of homeopathy commonly emphasize the dilutions involved in homeopathy, using analogies.[113] One mathematically correct example is that a 12C solution is equivalent to "a pinch of salt in both the North and South Atlantic Oceans".[114][115][116] One-third of a drop of some original substance diluted into all the water on Earth would produce a preparation with a concentration of about 13C.[113][117][118] Robert L. Park points out that a 200C dilution of duck liver, marketed under the name Oscillococcinum, would require 10320 universes worth of molecules to contain just one original molecule in the final substance.[119] The high dilutions characteristically used are often considered to be the most controversial and implausible aspect of homeopathy.[120]
Provings
Homeopaths claim that they can determine the properties of their preparations by following a method which they call "proving".[121] As performed by Hahnemann, provings involved administering various preparations to healthy volunteers. The volunteers were then observed, often for months at a time. They were made to keep extensive journals detailing all of their symptoms at specific times throughout the day. They were forbidden from consuming coffee, tea, spices, or wine for the duration of the experiment; playing chess was also prohibited because Hahnemann considered it to be "too exciting", though they were allowed to drink beer and encouraged to exercise in moderation.[122] At first Hahnemann used undiluted doses for provings, but he later advocated provings with preparations at a 30C dilution,[112] and most modern provings are carried out using ultra-dilute preparations.[123]
Provings are claimed to have been important in the development of the clinical trial, due to their early use of simple control groups, systematic and quantitative procedures, and some of the first application of statistics in medicine.[124] The lengthy records of self-experimentation by homeopaths have occasionally proven useful in the development of modern drugs: For example, evidence that nitroglycerin might be useful as a treatment for angina was discovered by looking through homeopathic provings, though homeopaths themselves never used it for that purpose at that time.[125] The first recorded provings were published by Hahnemann in his 1796 Essay on a New Principle.[126] His Fragmenta de Viribus (1805)[127] contained the results of 27 provings, and his 1810 Materia Medica Pura contained 65.[128] For James Tyler Kent's 1905 Lectures on Homoeopathic Materia Medica, 217 preparations underwent provings and newer substances are continually added to contemporary versions.[129][130]
Though the proving process has superficial similarities with clinical trials, it is fundamentally different in that the process is subjective, not blinded, and modern provings are unlikely to use pharmacologically active levels of the substance under proving.[131] As early as 1842, Oliver Holmes had noted that provings were impossibly vague, and the purported effect was not repeatable among different subjects.[36]
Evidence and efficacy
Outside of the alternative medicine community, scientists have long considered homeopathy a sham[132] or a pseudoscience,[133][134][135][136] and the medical community regards it as quackery.[135] There is an overall absence of sound statistical evidence of therapeutic efficacy, which is consistent with the lack of any biologically plausible pharmacological agent or mechanism.[8] Proponents argue that homeopathic medicines must work by some, as yet undefined, biophysical mechanism.[87] No homeopathic preparation has been shown to be different from placebo.[8]
Lack of scientific evidence
The lack of convincing scientific evidence supporting its efficacy[137] and its use of preparations without active ingredients have led to characterizations of homeopathy as pseudoscience and quackery,[138][139][140] or, in the words of a 1998 medical review, "placebo therapy at best and quackery at worst".[141] The Russian Academy of Sciences considers homeopathy a "dangerous 'pseudoscience' that does not work", and "urges people to treat homeopathy 'on a par with magic'".[138] The Chief Medical Officer for England, Dame Sally Davies, has stated that homeopathic preparations are "rubbish" and do not serve as anything more than placebos.[142] In 2013, Mark Walport, the UK Government Chief Scientific Adviser and head of the Government Office for Science said "homeopathy is nonsense, it is non-science."[143] His predecessor, John Beddington, also said that homeopathy "has no underpinning of scientific basis" and is being "fundamentally ignored" by the Government.[144]
Jack Killen, acting deputy director of the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine, says homeopathy "goes beyond current understanding of chemistry and physics". He adds: "There is, to my knowledge, no condition for which homeopathy has been proven to be an effective treatment."[137] Ben Goldacre says that homeopaths who misrepresent scientific evidence to a scientifically illiterate public, have "... walled themselves off from academic medicine, and critique has been all too often met with avoidance rather than argument".[145] Homeopaths often prefer to ignore meta-analyses in favour of cherry picked positive results, such as by promoting a particular observational study (one which Goldacre describes as "little more than a customer-satisfaction survey") as if it were more informative than a series of randomized controlled trials.[145]
In an article entitled "Should We Maintain an Open Mind about Homeopathy?"[146] published in the American Journal of Medicine, Michael Baum and Edzard Ernst – writing to other physicians – wrote that "Homeopathy is among the worst examples of faith-based medicine... These axioms [of homeopathy] are not only out of line with scientific facts but also directly opposed to them. If homeopathy is correct, much of physics, chemistry, and pharmacology must be incorrect...".
Plausibility of dilutions
The exceedingly low concentration of homeopathic preparations, which often lack even a single molecule of the diluted substance,[91] has been the basis of questions about the effects of the preparations since the 19th century.[147] The laws of chemistry give this dilution limit, which is related to the Avogadro number, as being roughly equal to 12C homeopathic dilutions (1 part in 1024).[113][148][149] James Randi and the 10:23 campaign groups have highlighted the lack of active ingredients by taking large 'overdoses'.[150] None of the hundreds of demonstrators in the UK, Australia, New Zealand, Canada and the US were injured and "no one was cured of anything, either".[150]
Modern advocates of homeopathy have proposed a concept of "water memory", according to which water "remembers" the substances mixed in it, and transmits the effect of those substances when consumed. This concept is inconsistent with the current understanding of matter, and water memory has never been demonstrated to have any detectable effect, biological or otherwise.[151][152] Existence of a pharmacological effect in the absence of any true active ingredient is inconsistent with the law of mass action and the observed dose-response relationships characteristic of therapeutic drugs.[153] Homeopaths contend that their methods produce a therapeutically active preparation, selectively including only the intended substance, though in reality any water will have been in contact with millions of different substances throughout its history, and homeopaths cannot account for the selected homeopathic substance being isolated as a special case in their process.[154]
Practitioners also hold that higher dilutions produce stronger medicinal effects. This idea is also inconsistent with observed dose-response relationships, where effects are dependent on the concentration of the active ingredient in the body.[153] Some contend that the phenomenon of hormesis may support the idea of dilution increasing potency,[155][156] but the dose-response relationship outside the zone of hormesis declines with dilution as normal, and nonlinear pharmacological effects do not provide any credible support for homeopathy.[154]
Efficacy
The placebo effect | The intensive consultation process and expectations for the homeopathic preparations may cause the effect |
Therapeutic effect of the consultation | The care, concern, and reassurance a patient experiences when opening up to a compassionate caregiver can have a positive effect on the patient's well-being. |
Unassisted natural healing | Time and the body's ability to heal without assistance can eliminate many diseases of their own accord. |
Unrecognized treatments | An unrelated food, exercise, environmental agent, or treatment for a different ailment, may have occurred. |
Regression towards the mean | Since many diseases or conditions are cyclical, symptoms vary over time and patients tend to seek care when discomfort is greatest; they may feel better anyway but because of the timing of the visit to the homeopath they attribute improvement to the preparation taken. |
Non-homeopathic treatment | Patients may also receive standard medical care at the same time as homeopathic treatment, and the former is responsible for improvement. |
Cessation of unpleasant treatment | Often homeopaths recommend patients stop getting medical treatment such as surgery or drugs, which can cause unpleasant side-effects; improvements are attributed to homeopathy when the actual cause is the cessation of the treatment causing side-effects in the first place, but the underlying disease remains untreated and still dangerous to the patient. |
No individual homeopathic preparation has been unambiguously shown by research to be different from placebo.[8] The methodological quality of the early primary research was low, with problems such as weaknesses in study design and reporting, small sample size, and selection bias. Since better quality trials have become available, the evidence for efficacy of homeopathy preparations has diminished; the highest-quality trials indicate that the preparations themselves exert no intrinsic effect.[10][158]: 206 [159] A review conducted in 2010 of all the pertinent studies of "best evidence" produced by the Cochrane Collaboration concluded that this evidence "fails to demonstrate that homeopathic medicines have effects beyond placebo."[13]
In 2009, the United Kingdom's House of Commons Science and Technology Committee concluded that there was no compelling evidence of effect other than placebo.[160] The Australian National Health and Medical Research Council completed a comprehensive review of the effectiveness of homeopathic preparations in 2015, in which it concluded that "there were no health conditions for which there was reliable evidence that homeopathy was effective."[161] The European Academies' Science Advisory Council (EASAC) published its official analysis in 2017 finding a lack of evidence that homeopathic products are effective, and raising concerns about quality control.[162] In contrast a 2011 book was published, purportedly financed by the Swiss government, that concluded that homeopathy was effective and cost efficient.[163] Although hailed by proponents as proof that homeopathy works,[164] it was found to be scientifically, logically and ethically flawed, with most authors having a conflict of interest.[164] The Swiss Federal Office of Public Health later released a statement saying the book was published without the consent of the Swiss government.[165]
Meta-analyses, essential tools to summarize evidence of therapeutic efficacy,[166] and systematic reviews have found that the methodological quality in the majority of randomized trials in homeopathy have shortcomings and that such trials were generally of lower quality than trials of conventional medicine.[167][168] A major issue has been publication bias, where positive results are more likely to be published in journals.[169][unreliable source?][170][171] This has been particularly marked in alternative medicine journals, where few of the published articles (just 5% during the year 2000) tend to report null results.[145] A systematic review of the available systematic reviews confirmed in 2002 that higher-quality trials tended to have less positive results, and found no convincing evidence that any homeopathic preparation exerts clinical effects different from placebo.[8] The same conclusion was also reached in 2005 in a meta-analysis published in The Lancet. A 2017 systematic review and meta-analysis found that the most reliable evidence did not support the effectiveness of non-individualized homeopathy.[172]
Health organizations, including the UK's National Health Service,[173] the American Medical Association,[174] the FASEB,[175] and the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia,[161] have issued statements saying that there is no good-quality evidence that homeopathy is effective as a treatment for any health condition.[173] In 2009, World Health Organization official Mario Raviglione criticized the use of homeopathy to treat tuberculosis; similarly, another WHO spokesperson argued there was no evidence homeopathy would be an effective treatment for diarrhoea.[176] They warned against the use of homeopathy for serious conditions such as depression, HIV and malaria.[177] The American College of Medical Toxicology and the American Academy of Clinical Toxicology recommend that no one use homeopathic treatment for disease or as a preventive health measure.[178] These organizations report that no evidence exists that homeopathic treatment is effective, but that there is evidence that using these treatments produces harm and can bring indirect health risks by delaying conventional treatment.[178]
Purported effects in other biological systems
While some articles have suggested that homeopathic solutions of high dilution can have statistically significant effects on organic processes including the growth of grain[179] and enzyme reactions, such evidence is disputed since attempts to replicate them have failed.[180][181][182][183][184][185] In 2001 and 2004, Madeleine Ennis published a number of studies that reported that homeopathic dilutions of histamine exerted an effect on the activity of basophils.[186][187] In response to the first of these studies, Horizon aired a programme in which British scientists attempted to replicate Ennis' results; they were unable to do so.[188] A 2007 systematic review of high-dilution experiments found that none of the experiments with positive results could be reproduced by all investigators.[189]
In 1988, French immunologist Jacques Benveniste published a paper in the journal Nature while working at INSERM.[190] The paper purported to have discovered that basophils released histamine when exposed to a homeopathic dilution of anti-immunoglobulin E antibody. Skeptical of the findings, Nature assembled an independent investigative team to determine the accuracy of the research. After investigation the team found that the experiments were "statistically ill-controlled", "interpretation has been clouded by the exclusion of measurements in conflict with the claim", and concluded, "We believe that experimental data have been uncritically assessed and their imperfections inadequately reported."[191][192][193]
Ethics and safety
The provision of homeopathic preparations has been described as unethical.[194][195] Michael Baum, professor emeritus of surgery and visiting professor of medical humanities at University College London (UCL), has described homeopathy as a "cruel deception".[196] Edzard Ernst, the first professor of complementary medicine in the United Kingdom and a former homeopathic practitioner,[197][198][199] has expressed his concerns about pharmacists who violate their ethical code by failing to provide customers with "necessary and relevant information" about the true nature of the homeopathic products they advertise and sell.[200] In 2013 the UK Advertising Standards Authority concluded that the Society of Homeopaths were targeting vulnerable ill people and discouraging the use of essential medical treatment while making misleading claims of efficacy for homeopathic products.[201] In 2015 the Federal Court of Australia imposed penalties on a homeopathic company for making false or misleading statements about the efficacy of the whooping cough vaccine and recommending homeopathic remedies as an alternative.[202]
A 2000 review by homeopaths reported that homeopathic preparations are "unlikely to provoke severe adverse reactions".[203] In 2012, a systematic review evaluating evidence of homeopathy's possible adverse effects concluded that "homeopathy has the potential to harm patients and consumers in both direct and indirect ways".[204] A 2016 systematic review and meta-analysis found that, in homeopathic clinical trials, adverse effects were reported among the patients who received homeopathy about as often as they were reported among patients who received placebo or conventional medicine.[205]
Some homeopathic preparations involve poisons such as Belladonna, arsenic, and poison ivy. In rare cases, the original ingredients are present at detectable levels. This may be due to improper preparation or intentional low dilution. Serious adverse effects such as seizures and death have been reported or associated with some homeopathic preparations.[204] Instances of arsenic poisoning have occurred.[206] In 2009, the FDA advised consumers to stop using three discontinued cold remedy Zicam products because it could cause permanent damage to users' sense of smell.[207] In 2016 the FDA issued a safety alert to consumers[208] warning against the use of homeopathic teething gels and tablets following reports of adverse events after their use.[209] A previous FDA investigation had found that these products were improperly diluted and contained "unsafe levels of belladonna" and that the reports of serious adverse events in children using this product were "consistent with belladonna toxicity".[210]
Patients who choose to use homeopathy rather than evidence-based medicine risk missing timely diagnosis and effective treatment, thereby worsening the outcomes of serious conditions such as cancer.[211][212][213][214] The Russian Commission on Pseudoscience has said homeopathy is not safe because "patients spend significant amounts of money, buying medicines that do not work and disregard already known effective treatment."[215] Critics have cited cases of patients failing to receive proper treatment for diseases that could have been easily managed with conventional medicine and who have died as a result.[216][217] They have also condemned the "marketing practice" of criticizing and downplaying the effectiveness of medicine.[145][217] Homeopaths claim that use of conventional medicines will "push the disease deeper" and cause more serious conditions, a process referred to as "suppression".[218] In 1978, Anthony Campbell, a consultant physician at the Royal London Homeopathic Hospital, criticized statements by George Vithoulkas claiming that syphilis, when treated with antibiotics, would develop into secondary and tertiary syphilis with involvement of the central nervous system.[219] Vithoulkas' claims echo the idea that treating a disease with external medication used to treat the symptoms would only drive it deeper into the body and conflict with scientific studies, which indicate that penicillin treatment produces a complete cure of syphilis in more than 90% of cases.[220]
The use of homeopathy as a preventive for serious infectious diseases, called homeoprophylaxis, is especially controversial.[221] Some homeopaths (particularly those who are non-physicians) advise their patients against immunization.[213][222][223] Others have suggested that vaccines be replaced with homeopathic "nosodes".[224] While Hahnemann was opposed to such preparations, modern homeopaths often use them although there is no evidence to indicate they have any beneficial effects.[225][226] Promotion of homeopathic alternatives to vaccines has been characterized as dangerous, inappropriate and irresponsible.[227][228] In December 2014, the Australian homeopathy supplier Homeopathy Plus! was found to have acted deceptively in promoting homeopathic alternatives to vaccines.[229] In 2019, an investigative journalism piece by the Telegraph revealed that homeopathy practitioners were actively discouraging patients from vaccinating their children.[230] Cases of homeopaths advising against the use of anti-malarial drugs have also been identified,[214][231][232] putting visitors to the tropics in severe danger.[214][231][232][233]
A 2006 review recommends that pharmacy colleges include a required course where ethical dilemmas inherent in recommending products lacking proven safety and efficacy data be discussed and that students should be taught where unproven systems such as homeopathy depart from evidence-based medicine.[234]
Regulation and prevalence
Homeopathy is fairly common in some countries while being uncommon in others; is highly regulated in some countries and mostly unregulated in others. It is practiced worldwide and professional qualifications and licences are needed in most countries.[235] A 2019 WHO report found that 100 out of 133 Member States surveyed in 2012 acknowledged that their population used homeopathy, with 22 saying the practice was regulated and 13 providing health insurance coverage.[236] In some countries, there are no specific legal regulations concerning the use of homeopathy, while in others, licences or degrees in conventional medicine from accredited universities are required. In 2001 homeopathy had been integrated into the national health care systems of many countries, including India, Mexico, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, and the United Kingdom.[235]
Regulation
Some homeopathic treatment is covered by the public health service of several European countries, including Scotland,[237] and Luxembourg.[238] It used to be covered in France until 2021.[25] In other countries, such as Belgium, homeopathy is not covered. In Austria, the public health service requires scientific proof of effectiveness in order to reimburse medical treatments and homeopathy is listed as not reimbursable,[239] but exceptions can be made;[240] private health insurance policies sometimes include homeopathic treatments.[235] In 2018, Austria's Medical University of Vienna stopped teaching homeopathy.[241] The Swiss government withdrew coverage of homeopathy and four other complementary treatments in 2005, stating that they did not meet efficacy and cost-effectiveness criteria,[242] but following a referendum in 2009 the five therapies were reinstated for a further 6-year trial period.[243] In Germany, homeopathic treatments are covered by 70 percent of government medical plans, and available in almost every pharmacy.[241] In January 2024, German health minister Karl Lauterbach announced plans to withdraw all statutory health insurance coverage for homeopathic and anthroposophic treatments, citing a lack of scientific evidence for their efficacy.[244]
The English NHS recommended against prescribing homeopathic preparations in 2017.[245] In 2018, prescriptions worth £55,000 were written in defiance of the guidelines, representing less than 0.001% of the total NHS prescribing budget.[246][247] In 2016 the UK's Committee of Advertising Practice compliance team wrote to homeopaths[248] in the UK to "remind them of the rules that govern what they can and can't say in their marketing materials".[249] The letter told homeopaths to "ensure that they do not make any direct or implied claims that homeopathy can treat medical conditions" and asks them to review their marketing communications "including websites and social media pages" to ensure compliance.[250] Homeopathic services offered at Bristol Homeopathic Hospital in the UK ceased in October 2015.[251][252]
Member states of the European Union are required to ensure that homeopathic products are registered, although this process does not require any proof of efficacy.[253] In Spain, the Association for the protection of patients from pseudo-scientific therapies is lobbying to get rid of the easy registration procedure for homeopathic remedies.[253] In Bulgaria, Hungary, Latvia, Romania and Slovenia homeopathy, by law, can only be practiced by medical practitioners. However, in Slovenia if doctors practice homeopathy their medical license will be revoked.[253] In Germany, to become a homeopathic physician, one must attend a three-year training program, while France, Austria and Denmark mandate licences to diagnose any illness or dispense of any product whose purpose is to treat any illness.[235] Homeopaths in the UK are under no legal regulations, meaning anyone can call themselves homeopaths and administer homeopathic remedies.[245]
The Indian government recognizes homeopathy as one of its national systems of medicine and they are sold with medical claims.[254][236] It has established the Department of Ayurveda, Yoga and Naturopathy, Unani, Siddha and Homoeopathy (AYUSH) under the Ministry of Health & Family Welfare.[255] The south Indian state of Kerala also has a cabinet-level AYUSH department.[256] The Central Council of Homoeopathy was established in 1973 to monitor higher education in homeopathy, and the National Institute of Homoeopathy in 1975.[257] Principals and standards for homeopathic products are covered by the Homoeopathic pharmacopoeia of India.[89] A minimum of a recognized diploma in homeopathy and registration on a state register or the Central Register of Homoeopathy is required to practice homeopathy in India.[258]
Some medical schools in Pakistan,[259] India,[260][261] and Bangladesh,[262][263] offer an undergraduate degree programme in homeopathy.[264] Upon completion the college may award a Bachelor of Homoeopathy Medicine and Surgery (B.H.M.S.).
In the United States each state is responsible for the laws and licensing requirements for homeopathy.[265] In 2015, the FDA held a hearing on homeopathic product regulation.[266] At the hearing, representatives from the Center for Inquiry and the Committee for Skeptical Inquiry summarized the harm that is done to the general public from homeopathics and proposed regulatory actions:[267] In 2016 the United States Federal Trade Commission (FTC) issued an "Enforcement Policy Statement Regarding Marketing Claims for Over-the-Counter Homeopathic Drugs" which specified that the FTC will apply the same standard to homeopathic drugs that it applies to other products claiming similar benefits.[268] A related report concluded that claims of homeopathy effectiveness "are not accepted by most modern medical experts and do not constitute competent and reliable scientific evidence that these products have the claimed treatment effects."[269] In 2019, the FDA removed an enforcement policy that permitted unapproved homeopathics to be sold.[270] Currently no homeopathic products are approved by the FDA.[271]
Homeopathic remedies are regulated as natural health products in Canada.[89] Ontario became the first province in the country to regulate the practice of homeopathy, a move that was widely criticized by scientists and doctors.[272] Health Canada requires all products to have a licence before being sold and applicants have to submit evidence on "the safety, efficacy and quality of a homeopathic medicine".[273] In 2015 the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation tested the system by applying for and then receiving a government approved licence for a made-up drug aimed at kids.[274]
In Australia, the sale of homeopathic products is regulated by the Therapeutic Goods Administration.[275] In 2015, the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia concluded that there is "no reliable evidence that homeopathy is effective and should not be used to treat health conditions that are chronic, serious, or could become serious". They recommended anyone considering using homeopathy should first get advice from a registered health practitioner.[161] A 2017 review into Pharmacy Remuneration and Regulation recommended that products be banned from pharmacies;[276] while noting the concerns the government did not adopt the recommendation.[277] In New Zealand there are no regulations specific to homeopathy[278] and the New Zealand Medical Association does not oppose the use of homeopathy,[279] a stance that has been called unethical by some doctors.[280]
Prevalence
Homeopathy is one of the most commonly used forms of alternative medicines and it has a large worldwide market.[89] The exact size is uncertain, but information available on homeopathic sales suggests it forms a large share of the medical market.[89]
In 1999, about 1000 UK doctors practiced homeopathy, most being general practitioners who prescribe a limited number of remedies. A further 1500 homeopaths with no medical training are also thought to practice. Over ten thousand German and French doctors use homeopathy.[87] In the United States a National Health Interview Survey estimated 5 million adults and 1 million children used homeopathy in 2011. An analysis of this survey concluded that most cases were self-prescribed for colds and musculoskeletal pain.[281] Major retailers like Walmart, CVS, and Walgreens sell homeopathic products that are packaged to resemble conventional medicines.[241]
The homeopathic drug market in Germany is worth about 650 million euro with a 2014 survey finding that 60 percent of Germans reported trying homeopathy.[241] A 2009 survey found that only 17 percent of respondents knew how homeopathic medicine was made.[241] France spent more than US$408 million on homeopathic products in 2008.[89] In the United States the homeopathic market is worth about $3 billion-a-year;[282] with 2.9 billion spent in 2007.[89] Australia spent US$7.3 million on homeopathic medicines in 2008.[89]
In India, a 2014 national health survey found that homeopathy was used by about 3% of the population.[283] Homeopathy is used in China, although it arrived a lot later than in many other countries, partly due to the restriction on foreigners that persisted until late in the nineteenth century.[284] Throughout Africa there is a high reliance on traditional medicines, which can be attributed to the cost of modern medicines and the relative prevalence of practitioners. Many African countries do not have any official training facilities.[235]
Veterinary use
Using homeopathy as a treatment for animals is termed "veterinary homeopathy" and dates back to the inception of homeopathy; Hahnemann himself wrote and spoke of the use of homeopathy in animals other than humans.[285] The use of homeopathy in the organic farming industry is heavily promoted.[286] Given that homeopathy's effects in humans are due to the placebo effect and the counseling aspects of the consultation, such treatments are even less effective in animals.[287] Studies have also found that giving animals placebos can play active roles in influencing pet owners to believe in the effectiveness of the treatment when none exists.[288] This means that animals given homeopathic remedies will continue to suffer, resulting in animal welfare concerns.[289][290]
Little existing research on the subject is of a high enough scientific standard to provide reliable data on efficacy.[288][291][292] A 2016 review of peer-reviewed articles from 1981 to 2014 by scientists from the University of Kassel, Germany, concluded that there is not enough evidence to support homeopathy as an effective treatment of infectious diseases in livestock.[293] The UK's Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) has adopted a robust position against use of "alternative" pet preparations including homeopathy.[294] The British Veterinary Association's position statement on alternative medicines says that it "cannot endorse" homeopathy,[295] and the Australian Veterinary Association includes it on its list of "ineffective therapies".[296]
See also
References
- ^
- Tuomela, R (1987). "Science, Protoscience, and Pseudoscience". In Pitt JC, Marcello P (eds.). Rational Changes in Science. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Vol. 98. Springer. pp. 83–101. doi:10.1007/978-94-009-3779-6_4. ISBN 978-94-010-8181-8. ISSN 0068-0346.
- Mukerji N, Ernst E (September 14, 2022). "Why homoeopathy is pseudoscience". Synthese. 200 (5). doi:10.1007/s11229-022-03882-w. eISSN 1573-0964. S2CID 252297716.
- Baran GR, Kiana MF, Samuel SP (2014). "Science, Pseudoscience, and Not Science: How do They Differ?". Healthcare and Biomedical Technology in the 21st Century. Springer. pp. 19–57. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-8541-4_2. ISBN 978-1-4614-8540-7.
within the traditional medical community it is considered to be quackery
- Ladyman J (2013). "Chapter 3: Towards a Demarcation of Science from Pseudoscience". In Pigliucci M, Boudry M (eds.). Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem. University of Chicago Press. pp. 48–49. ISBN 978-0-226-05196-3.
Yet homeopathy is a paradigmatic example of pseudoscience. It is neither simply bad science nor science fraud, but rather profoundly departs from scientific method and theories while being described as scientific by some of its adherents (often sincerely).
- Tuomela, R (1987). "Science, Protoscience, and Pseudoscience". In Pitt JC, Marcello P (eds.). Rational Changes in Science. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Vol. 98. Springer. pp. 83–101. doi:10.1007/978-94-009-3779-6_4. ISBN 978-94-010-8181-8. ISSN 0068-0346.
- ^ "Homeopathic Physician Licensure". OLR Research Report. Retrieved November 25, 2023.
- ^ a b Hahnemann, Samuel (1833). The homœopathic medical doctrine, or "Organon of the healing art". Dublin: W. F. Wakeman. pp. iii, 48–49.
Observation, reflection, and experience have unfolded to me that the best and true method of cure is founded on the principle, similia similibus curentur. To cure in a mild, prompt, safe, and durable manner, it is necessary to choose in each case a medicine that will excite an affection similar (ὅμοιος πάθος) to that against which it is employed.
Translator: Charles H. Devrient, Esq. - ^ "Homeopathy". Royal Pharmaceutical Society. Retrieved November 17, 2019.
- ^ "Homeopathy". nhs.uk. October 18, 2017. Retrieved November 10, 2019.
- ^
- Shang, Aijing; Huwiler-Müntener, Karin; Nartey, Linda; Jüni, Peter; Dörig, Stephan; Sterne, Jonathan AC; Pewsner, Daniel; Egger, Matthias (2005). "Are the clinical effects of homoeopathy placebo effects? Comparative study of placebo-controlled trials of homoeopathy and allopathy". The Lancet. 366 (9487): 726–32. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67177-2. PMID 16125589. S2CID 17939264.
- Ernst, E. (December 2012). "Homeopathy: a critique of current clinical research". Skeptical Inquirer. 36 (6).
- "Homeopathy". American Cancer Society. Archived from the original on March 16, 2013. Retrieved October 12, 2014.
- UK Parliamentary Committee Science and Technology Committee. "Evidence Check 2: Homeopathy"
- Grimes, D.R. (2012). "Proposed mechanisms for homeopathy are physically impossible". Focus on Alternative and Complementary Therapies. 17 (3): 149–55. doi:10.1111/j.2042-7166.2012.01162.x.
- "Homeopathic products and practices: assessing the evidence and ensuring consistency in regulating medical claims in the EU" (PDF). European Academies' Science Advisory Council. September 2017. p. 1. Retrieved October 1, 2017.
... we agree with previous extensive evaluations concluding that there are no known diseases for which there is robust, reproducible evidence that homeopathy is effective beyond the placebo effect.
- Oliver Wendell Holmes Sr. (1842). Homoeopathy and its kindred delusions: Two lectures delivered before the Boston Society for the Diffusion of Useful Knowledge. Boston. as reprinted in Oliver Wendell Holmes Sr. (1861). Currents and counter-currents in medical science. Ticknor and Fields. pp. 72–188. OCLC 1544161. OL 14731800M.
- Shang, Aijing; Huwiler-Müntener, Karin; Nartey, Linda; Jüni, Peter; Dörig, Stephan; Sterne, Jonathan AC; Pewsner, Daniel; Egger, Matthias (2005). "Are the clinical effects of homoeopathy placebo effects? Comparative study of placebo-controlled trials of homoeopathy and allopathy". The Lancet. 366 (9487): 726–32. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67177-2. PMID 16125589. S2CID 17939264.
- ^ Shang, Aijing; Huwiler-Müntener, Karin; Nartey, Linda; Jüni, Peter; Dörig, Stephan; Sterne, Jonathan AC; Pewsner, Daniel; Egger, Matthias (2005). "Are the clinical effects of homoeopathy placebo effects? Comparative study of placebo-controlled trials of homoeopathy and allopathy". The Lancet. 366 (9487): 726–32. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67177-2. PMID 16125589. S2CID 17939264.
- ^ a b c d e Ernst, E. (2002). "A systematic review of systematic reviews of homeopathy". British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. 54 (6): 577–82. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2125.2002.01699.x. PMC 1874503. PMID 12492603.
- ^ "Evidence Check 2: Homeopathy – Science and Technology Committee". British House of Commons Science and Technology Committee. February 22, 2010. Retrieved April 5, 2014.
- ^ a b Caulfield, Timothy; Debow, Suzanne (2005). "A systematic review of how homeopathy is represented in conventional and CAM peer reviewed journals". BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 5: 12. doi:10.1186/1472-6882-5-12. PMC 1177924. PMID 15955254.
- ^ Gorski, David (October 13, 2008). "Fun with homeopaths and meta-analyses of homeopathy trials". Science-Based Medicine. Retrieved November 9, 2019.
- ^ a b c d e f Shelton, JW (2004). Homeopathy: How it really works. Amherst, New York: Prometheus Books. ISBN 978-1-59102-109-4.
- ^ a b Ernst, E. (2010). "Homeopathy: What does the "best" evidence tell us?". Medical Journal of Australia. 192 (8): 458–60. doi:10.5694/j.1326-5377.2010.tb03585.x. PMID 20402610. S2CID 42180344.
- ^ Baran GR, Kiana MF, Samuel SP (2014). "Science, Pseudoscience, and Not Science: How do They Differ?". Healthcare and Biomedical Technology in the 21st Century. Springer. pp. 19–57. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-8541-4_2. ISBN 978-1-4614-8540-7.
within the traditional medical community it is considered to be quackery
- ^ Collins, Nick (April 18, 2013). "Homeopathy is nonsense, says new chief scientist". The Daily Telegraph. Archived from the original on April 20, 2013. Retrieved September 9, 2013.
- ^ Paul S. Boyer (2001). The Oxford companion to United States history. Oxford University Press. p. 630. ISBN 978-0-19-508209-8. Retrieved January 15, 2013.
After 1847, when regular doctors organized the American Medical Association (AMA), that body led the war on "quackery", especially targeting dissenting medical groups such as homeopaths, who prescribed infinitesimally small doses of medicine. Ironically, even as the AMA attacked all homeopathy as quackery, educated homeopathic physicians were expelling untrained quacks from their ranks.
- ^ Musgrave, I (April 8, 2014). "No evidence homeopathy is effective: NHMRC review". The Conversation. Retrieved January 10, 2015.
- ^ "Swiss make New Year's regulations". Swiss Info. January 2012. Retrieved December 16, 2015.
- ^ "Homeopathic remedies are 'nonsense and risk significant harm' say 29 European scientific bodies". The Independent. September 23, 2017. Retrieved October 10, 2017.
- ^ "Memorandum #2. Homeopathy as pseudoscience". Commission on Pseudoscience. February 7, 2017. Retrieved June 25, 2019.
- ^ "NHS to ban homeopathy and herbal medicine, as 'misuse of resources'". Daily Telegraph. July 21, 2017. Archived from the original on January 11, 2022. Retrieved July 21, 2017.
- ^ a b Donnelly, Laura (June 5, 2018). "High Court backs NHS decision to stop funding homeopathy". Daily Telegraph. Archived from the original on January 11, 2022. Retrieved August 26, 2018.
- ^ a b Gallagher, James (November 13, 2015). "Homeopathy 'could be blacklisted'". BBC News. Retrieved December 5, 2017.
- ^ a b "France to stop reimbursing patients for homeopathy". The Guardian. Agence France-Presse. July 10, 2019. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved July 30, 2019.
- ^ a b c "Homéopathie: 2021 signe la fin du remboursement". France Info. January 2021. Retrieved November 18, 2023.
- ^ a b Güell, Oriol (November 14, 2018). "Spain moves to ban pseudo-therapies from universities and health centers". El País. ISSN 1134-6582. Retrieved July 30, 2019.
- ^ Loudon, Irvine (December 2006). "A brief history of homeopathy". Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine. 99 (12): 607–610. doi:10.1177/014107680609901206. ISSN 0141-0768. PMC 1676328. PMID 17139061.
- ^ Lasagna L (1970) [1962]. The doctors' dilemmas. New York: Collier Books. p. 33. ISBN 978-0-8369-1669-0.
- ^ a b Edzard Ernst; Singh, Simon (2008). Trick or Treatment: The Undeniable Facts about Alternative Medicine. New York: W. W. Norton. ISBN 978-0-393-06661-6.
- ^ W. Steven Pray (August 1, 2003). a History of Nonprescription Product Regulation. Psychology Press. p. 192. ISBN 978-0-7890-1538-9. Retrieved January 21, 2013.
- ^ Dean ME (2001). "Homeopathy and "the progress of science"" (PDF). Hist Sci. 39 (125 Pt 3): 255–83. Bibcode:2001HisSc..39..255E. doi:10.1177/007327530103900301. PMID 11712570. S2CID 23943688. Archived from the original (PDF) on January 1, 2006. Retrieved March 31, 2009.
- ^ Whorton JC (2004). Nature Cures: The History of Alternative Medicine in America. New York: Oxford University Press US. pp. 18, 52. ISBN 978-0-19-517162-4.
- ^ Robert W. Ullman; Judyth Reichenberg-Ullman (October 1, 1994). The patient's guide to homeopathic medicine. Picnic Point Press. pp. 1–2. ISBN 978-0-9640654-2-0. Retrieved January 24, 2013.
- ^ Merrell, Woodson C.; Shalts, Edward (2002). "Homeopathy". The Medical Clinics of North America. 86 (1): 47–62. doi:10.1016/s0025-7125(03)00071-3. ISSN 0025-7125. PMID 11795090.
- ^ J. D. White; John Hugh McQuillen; George Jacob Ziegler; James William White; Edward Cameron Kirk; Lovick Pierce Anthony, eds. (December 1894). "A wail from the waste-basket". The Dental Cosmos (editorial). 36 (12): 1030–32.
- ^ a b c Oliver Wendell Holmes Sr. (1842). Homoeopathy and its kindred delusions: Two lectures delivered before the Boston Society for the Diffusion of Useful Knowledge. Boston. as reprinted in Oliver Wendell Holmes Sr. (1861). Currents and counter-currents in medical science. Ticknor and Fields. pp. 72–188. OCLC 1544161. OL 14731800M.
- ^ Atwood, Kimball (January 4, 2008). "Homeopathy and evidence-based medicine: back to the future". Science Based Medicine. Retrieved September 9, 2013.
- ^ a b Richard Haehl (1922). Samuel Hahnemann: His Life and Work: Based on Recently Discovered State Papers, Documents, Letters, Etc. B. Jain Publishers. p. 101. ISBN 978-81-7021-693-3. Retrieved January 24, 2013.
- ^ Anne Taylor Kirschmann (2004). A vital force: women in American homeopathy. Rutgers University Press. p. 11. ISBN 978-0-8135-3320-9. Retrieved January 28, 2013.
- ^ a b "Dynamization and dilution". Complementary and Alternative Medicine. Creighton University Department of Pharmacology. Archived from the original on August 26, 2002. Retrieved March 24, 2009.
- ^ Hahnemann S (1833). The organon of the healing art (5th ed.). Keats Pub. aphorism 269. ISBN 978-0-87983-228-5.. Hahnemann S (1842). The organon of the healing art (6th ed.). Keats Pub. (published 1921). aphorism 270. ISBN 978-0-87983-228-5.
- ^ a b c "History of Homeopathy". Creighton University Department of Pharmacology. July 2007. Archived from the original on July 5, 2007. Retrieved July 23, 2007.
- ^ John Henry Clarke (January 1, 2001). Homeopathy explained. Nanopathy. pp. 22–. GGKEY:JWCD56EF80T. Retrieved January 12, 2013.
- ^ Grimes, D. R. (2012). "Proposed mechanisms for homeopathy are physically impossible". Focus on Alternative and Complementary Therapies. 17 (3): 154. doi:10.1111/j.2042-7166.2012.01162.x.
- ^ a b King S. "Miasms in homeopathy". Classical homeopathy. Archived from the original on March 7, 2009. Retrieved March 25, 2009.
- ^ Ward JW (July 1937). "Taking the history of the case". Pacific Coast Journal of Homeopathy. Retrieved October 22, 2007.
- ^ "Cause of disease in homeopathy". Creighton University Department of Pharmacology. Archived from the original on December 31, 2009. Retrieved July 23, 2007.
- ^ Helmuth, William Tod (1911). Chisholm, Hugh (ed.). Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 13 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 645. . In
- ^ Hahnemann S (1828). Die chronischen Krankheiten, ihre eigenthümliche Natur und homöopathische Heilung [The chronic diseases, their specific nature and homoeopathic treatment]. Dresden and Leipzig: Arnoldische Buchhandlung.[page needed]
- ^ Miller, Timothy (1995). America's alternative religions. State University of New York Press, Albany. pp. 80. ISBN 978-0-7914-2397-4.
- ^ "Homeopathy Timeline". Whole Health Now. Archived from the original on December 15, 2018. Retrieved July 23, 2007.
- ^ Toufexis A, Cole W, Hallanan DB (September 25, 1995). "Is homeopathy good medicine?". Time. Archived from the original on June 14, 2009.
- ^ Ernst, E.; Kaptchuk, TJ (1996). "Homeopathy revisited". Archives of Internal Medicine. 156 (19): 2162–4. doi:10.1001/archinte.156.19.2162. PMID 8885813.
- ^ Kaufman M (1971). Homeopathy in America: The rise and fall of a medical heresy. The Johns Hopkins University Press. ISBN 978-0-8018-1238-5.[page needed]
- ^ Coulter HL (1973). Divided Legacy. Berkeley: North Atlantic. pp. II:544–46, III:267–70, 298–305. OCLC 9538442.
- ^ Death rates in conventional hospitals were typically two- to eight-fold higher than in homeopathic hospitals for patients with these infectious diseases; see Bradford TL (2007) [1900]. The logic of figures or comparative results of homeopathic and other treatments. Kessinger. ISBN 978-1-4304-8892-7.[page needed]
- ^ Forbes J (1846). Homeopathy, allopathy and young physic. London.
- ^ Simpson JY (1853). Homoeopathy, its tenets and tendencies, theoretical, theological and therapeutical. Edinburgh: Sutherland & Knox. p. 11.
- ^ Allen JA, ed. (1867). "Homœopathists vs homœopathy". Chic Med J. 24 (6): 268–69. PMC 9801777. PMID 37412875.
- ^ Ernst, Edzard. "Standing up for the truth about homeopathy and Nazi medicine". The Irish Times. Retrieved October 26, 2020.
- ^ Paul Ulrich Unschuld (August 9, 2009). What Is Medicine?: Western and Eastern Approaches to Healing. University of California Press. p. 171. ISBN 978-0-520-94470-1. Retrieved September 7, 2013.
- ^ "Homeopathic Hassle". Time. August 20, 1956. Archived from the original on December 14, 2008.
- ^ Rader WM (March 1, 1985). "Riding the coattails of homeopathy's revival". FDA Consumer Magazine.
- ^ a b Jonas, WB; TJ Kaptchuk; K Linde (2003). "A critical overview of homeopathy". Annals of Internal Medicine. 138 (5): 393–99. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-138-5-200303040-00009. PMID 12614092. S2CID 22787732.
- ^ Lockie, Andrew (2000). Encyclopedia of Homeopathy (1st ed.). New York: Dorling Kindersley. p. 19. ISBN 978-0-7566-1871-1.
- ^ Bruce M. Hood (April 7, 2009). SuperSense. HarperCollins. p. 157. ISBN 978-0-06-186793-4. Retrieved September 7, 2013.
- ^ William T. Jarvis (December 15, 2001). "Response to Isadora Stehlin "Homeopathy: real medicine or empty promises?" (originally published in FDA Consumer April 1997)".
- ^ a b Crockett, Chambers (2012). "Death by homeopathy: issues for civil, criminal and coronial law and for health service policy". Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics. 19 (3): 454–78. PMID 22558899.
- ^ "The Australian report". HRI Research. April 6, 2017. Retrieved August 13, 2018.
- ^ Abusson, Kate (May 3, 2018). "Pharmacies avoid homeopathy ban as government parks recommendations". Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved August 13, 2018.
- ^ Kelly Servick (April 21, 2015). "FDA takes new look at homeopathy". Science. Retrieved April 23, 2015.
Under FDA guidelines issued in 1988, a company can sell homeopathic products over the counter without demonstrating their safety or efficacy, and―unlike dietary supplements―their packaging can include claims about treating specific conditions, as long as they are "self-limiting" and not chronic. Such conditions include sprains, colds, or allergies.
- ^ Frazier, Kendrick (2018). "FDA to Regulate Some Homeopathic Products; CFI Hails Move". Skeptical Inquirer. 42 (2): 12.
- ^ "CENTER FOR INQUIRY SUES CVS FOR FRAUD OVER SALE OF HOMEOPATHIC FAKE MEDICINE" (Press release). Center for Inquiry. July 9, 2018. Retrieved July 9, 2018.
- ^ Bellamy, Jann (July 19, 2018). "CVS sued for deceiving consumers in sale of homeopathic remedies". Science Based Medicine. Retrieved January 22, 2019.
- ^ Fidalgo, Paul (September 2019). "CFI sues Walmart for fraud for selling homeopathic fake medicine". Skeptical Inquirer. Amherst, NY: Center for Inquiry.
- ^ Vyse, Stuart (July 10, 2019). "What Should Become of a Monument to Pseudoscience?". Skeptical Inquirer. Center for Inquiry. Retrieved December 2, 2019.
- ^ Frazier, Kendrick (2019). "CFI survey on Homeopathy: Consumers feel scammed by Walmart and CVS". Skeptical Inquirer. 43 (6): 7.
- ^ Fidalgo, Paul (September 17, 2019). "CONSUMERS FEEL "SCAMMED" BY WALMART AND CVS OVER HOMEOPATHIC FAKE MEDICINE, SURVEY SHOWS". Center for Inquiry. Retrieved November 9, 2019.
- ^ "France will end healthcare refunds for homeopathic drugs". Reuters. July 9, 2019.
- ^ Ansede, Manuel (March 4, 2016). "La Universidad de Barcelona fulmina su máster de homeopatía". El País.
- ^ "El Máster de Homeopatía de la Universidad de Valencia cancela su edición para el próximo curso". Diario ABC. April 7, 2016.
- ^ "Homeopathic drugs: No better than placebos?". The Washington Post. December 21, 2015. Retrieved December 22, 2015.
- ^ Jonas: Mosby's Dictionary of Complementary and Alternative Medicine. (c) 2005, Elsevier
- ^ a b Bellavite, Paolo; Conforti, Anita; Piasere, Valeria; Ortolani, Riccardo (2005). "Immunology and Homeopathy. 1. Historical Background". Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 2 (4): 441–52. doi:10.1093/ecam/neh141. PMC 1297514. PMID 16322800.
- ^ Mathur KN (2003). Prinzipien der homöopathischen Verschreibung: Synopsis weltweiter klinischer Erfahrungen (in German). Georg Thieme Verlag. pp. 122–23. ISBN 978-3-8304-9021-0. OCLC 76518035.
- ^ "Repertories today and yesterday". National Center for Homeopathy. Archived from the original on April 14, 2017. Retrieved August 31, 2020.
- ^ a b c Vickers, Andrew; Zollman, Catherine (October 23, 1999). "Homoeopathy". BMJ: British Medical Journal. 319 (7217): 1115–1118. doi:10.1136/bmj.319.7217.1115. ISSN 0959-8138. PMC 1116906. PMID 10531108.
- ^ Stehlin I (1996). "Homeopathy: Real medicine or empty promises?". U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Archived from the original on September 24, 2009. Retrieved October 1, 2007.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i "Safety issues in the preparation of homeopathic medicines" (PDF). World Health Organization.
- ^ "FAQs". The American Association of Homeopathic Pharmacists. Retrieved August 31, 2020.
- ^ a b Ernst, E (2005). "Is homeopathy a clinically valuable approach?" (PDF). Trends in Pharmacological Sciences. 26 (11): 547–48. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.385.5505. doi:10.1016/j.tips.2005.09.003. PMID 16165225.
- ^ Sagar, SM (2007). "Homeopathy: Does a teaspoon of honey help the medicine go down?". Current Oncology. 14 (4): 126–27. doi:10.3747/co.2007.150. PMC 1948865. PMID 17710203.
- ^ Kayne SB (2006). Homeopathic pharmacy: theory and practice (2 ed.). Elsevier Health Sciences. p. 171. ISBN 978-0-443-10160-1.
- ^ Owen, David (January 1, 2007). Principles and Practice of Homeopathy: The Therapeutic and Healing Process. Elsevier Health Sciences. p. 56. ISBN 978-0-443-10089-5.
- ^ Lack, Caleb W.; Rousseau, Jacques (March 8, 2016). Critical Thinking, Science, and Pseudoscience: Why We Can't Trust Our Brains. Springer Publishing Company. p. 206. ISBN 978-0-8261-9426-8.
- ^ Lee J, Thompson E (2007). "X-ray drug picture". The Homeopath. 26 (2): 43–48. ISSN 0263-3256.
- ^ Lee J, Thompson E (2007). "Postironium – the vastness of the universe knocks me off my feet". The Homeopath. 26 (2): 49–54. ISSN 0263-3256.
- ^ Kempf, EJ (1906). "European Medicine: A Résumé of Medical Progress During the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries". Medical Library and Historical Journal. 4 (1): 86–100. PMC 1692573. PMID 18340908.
- ^ "Electro-homeopathy clinics to be sealed after Holi". The Times of India. March 5, 2012. Retrieved August 13, 2018.
- ^ Shah R. "Call for introspection and awakening" (PDF). Life Force Center. Archived from the original (PDF) on February 2, 2007. Retrieved July 24, 2007.
- ^ Barwell B (2000). "The wo-wo effect". Homoeopathica. 20 (3). Archived from the original on July 26, 2009. Retrieved April 2, 2009.
- ^ Vanhaselen, R (1999). "The relationship between homeopathy and the Dr Bach system of flower remedies: A critical appraisal". British Homoeopathic Journal. 88 (3): 121–27. doi:10.1054/homp.1999.0308. PMID 10449052.
- ^ a b Kayne SB (2006). Homeopathic pharmacy: theory and practice (2 ed.). Elsevier Health Sciences. p. 53. ISBN 978-0-443-10160-1.
- ^ "Glossary of Homeopathic Terms". Creighton University Department of Pharmacology. Archived from the original on October 16, 2012. Retrieved February 15, 2009.
- ^ "Homeopathy: Diluted out of existence?". scilogs.com/in_scientio_veritas. January 22, 2011. Retrieved June 15, 2015.
- ^ "Homeopathic Medicine Potency or Dilution". ritecare.com. Archived from the original on August 21, 2015. Retrieved June 15, 2015.
- ^ Winston, Julian (April 1, 1989). "A brief history of potentizing machines". British Homoeopathic Journal. 78 (2): 59–68. doi:10.1016/S0007-0785(89)80050-X. ISSN 0007-0785. S2CID 71942187.
- ^ "Homeopathic Medicine Potency or Dilution". Archived from the original on August 21, 2015. Retrieved June 15, 2015.
- ^ Adler, U. C.; Adler, M. S. (2006). "Hahnemann's experiments with 50 millesimal potencies: a further review of his casebooks". Homeopathy. 95 (3): 171–181. doi:10.1016/j.homp.2006.03.003. ISSN 1475-4916. PMID 16815521. S2CID 3760829.
- ^ "Similia similibus curentur (Like cures like)". Creighton University Department of Pharmacology. Archived from the original on August 8, 2007. Retrieved August 20, 2007.
- ^ Page 3. "Alternative Medicine: Homeopathy-A Review" (PDF). International Journal of Pharmacotherapy. Archived from the original (PDF) on September 3, 2015. Retrieved August 10, 2015.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link) - ^ a b Hahnemann S (1921). The Organon of the Healing Art (6th ed.). Keats Pub. aphorism 128. ISBN 978-0-87983-228-5.
- ^ a b c For further discussion of homeopathic dilutions and the mathematics involved, see Homeopathic dilutions.
- ^ Bambridge AD (1989). Homeopathy investigated. Kent, England: Diasozo Trust. ISBN 978-0-948171-20-8.
- ^ Andrews P (1990). "Homeopathy and Hinduism". The Watchman Expositor. Watchman Fellowship.
- ^ A 12C solution produced using sodium chloride (also called natrum muriaticum in homeopathy) is the equivalent of dissolving 0.36 mL of table salt, weighing about 0.77 g, into a volume of water the size of the Atlantic Ocean, since the volume of the Atlantic Ocean and its adjacent seas is 3.55×108 km3 or 3.55×1020 L : Emery KO, Uchupi E (1984). The geology of the Atlantic Ocean. Springer. ISBN 978-0-387-96032-6.
- ^ The volume of all water on earth is about 1.36×109 km3: "Earth's water distribution". United States Geological Survey. August 28, 2006. Archived from the original on June 29, 2012. Retrieved March 14, 2008.
- ^ Gleick PH, Water resources, In Schneider SH, ed. (1996). Encyclopedia of climate and weather. Vol. 2. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 817–823.
- ^ Robert L. Park (2008). Superstition: Belief in the Age of Science. Princeton University Press. pp. 145–46. ISBN 978-0-691-13355-3.
- ^ Fisher, P (2007). "The Memory of Water: a scientific heresy?". Homeopathy. 96 (3): 141–2. doi:10.1016/j.homp.2007.05.008. PMID 17678808. S2CID 3737723.
- ^ Dantas, F; Fisher, P; Walach, H; Wieland, F; Rastogi, D; Teixeira, H; Koster, D; Jansen, J; Eizayaga, J (2007). "A systematic review of the quality of homeopathic pathogenetic trials published from 1945 to 1995". Homeopathy. 96 (1): 4–16. doi:10.1016/j.homp.2006.11.005. PMID 17227742. S2CID 3689226.
- ^ Bradford, Thomas Lindsley (1895). The Life and Letters of Dr. Samuel Hahnemann. Philadelphia: Boericke & Tafel. pp. 103–04. ISBN 978-1-330-00150-9. Retrieved August 27, 2015.
- ^ Kayne SB (2006). Homeopathic pharmacy: theory and practice (2 ed.). Elsevier Health Sciences. p. 52. ISBN 978-0-443-10160-1.
- ^ Cassedy JH (1999). American Medicine and Statistical Thinking, 1800–1860. iUniverse. ISBN 978-1-58348-428-9.[page needed]
- ^ Fye WB (1986). "Nitroglycerin: a homeopathic remedy". Circulation. 73 (1): 21–29. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.73.1.21. PMID 2866851.
- ^ Hahnemann S (1796). C. W. Hufelands (ed.). "Versuch über ein neues Prinzip zur Auffindung der Heilkräfte der Arzneisubstanzen, nebst einigen Blicken auf die bisherigen". Journal der Practischen Heilkunde (in German). II (3).
- ^ Hahnemann S (1805). Fragmenta de Viribus medicamentorum Positivis (in Latin). Leipzig.
- ^ Hahnemann S, Stapf E, Gross G, de Brunnow EG (1826–1828). Materia medica pura; sive, Doctrina de medicamentorum viribus in corpore humano sano observatis; e Germanico sermone in Latinum conversa (in Latin). Dresden: Arnold. OCLC 14840659.
- ^ Kent, James Tyler (1905). Lectures on Homoeopathic Materia Medica. Boericke & Tafel. ISBN 978-0-7222-9856-5.
- ^ Kent, James Tyler (March 31, 2020). Lectures on Homoeopathic Materia Medica: Together With Kent's "New Remedies" Incorporated and Arranged in One Alphabetical Order. B. Jain Publishers (P) Limited. ISBN 978-81-319-0259-2.
- ^ "Are the principles of Homeopathy scientifically valid?". Creighton University School of Medicine. Archived from the original on August 16, 2012.
- ^ Caulfield, Timothy; Rachul, Christen (2011). "Supported by science?: What Canadian naturopaths advertise to the public". Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology. 7 (1): 14. doi:10.1186/1710-1492-7-14. PMC 3182944. PMID 21920039.
Within the non-CAM scientific community, homeopathy has long been viewed as a sham
- ^ Tuomela, R (1987). "Science, Protoscience, and Pseudoscience". In Pitt JC, Marcello P (eds.). Rational Changes in Science. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Vol. 98. Springer. pp. 83–101. doi:10.1007/978-94-009-3779-6_4. ISBN 978-94-010-8181-8. ISSN 0068-0346.
- ^ Mukerji N, Ernst E (September 14, 2022). "Why homoeopathy is pseudoscience". Synthese. 200 (5). doi:10.1007/s11229-022-03882-w. eISSN 1573-0964. S2CID 252297716.
- ^ a b Baran GR, Kiana MF, Samuel SP (2014). "Science, Pseudoscience, and Not Science: How do They Differ?". Healthcare and Biomedical Technology in the 21st Century. Springer. pp. 19–57. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-8541-4_2. ISBN 978-1-4614-8540-7.
within the traditional medical community it is considered to be quackery
- ^ Ladyman J (2013). "Chapter 3: Towards a Demarcation of Science from Pseudoscience". In Pigliucci M, Boudry M (eds.). Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem. University of Chicago Press. pp. 48–49. ISBN 978-0-226-05196-3.
Yet homeopathy is a paradigmatic example of pseudoscience. It is neither simply bad science nor science fraud, but rather profoundly departs from scientific method and theories while being described as scientific by some of its adherents (often sincerely).
- ^ a b Adler J (February 4, 2004). "No way to treat the dying". Newsweek.
- ^ a b Dearden, Lizzie (February 7, 2017). "Russian Academy of Sciences says homeopathy is dangerous 'pseudoscience' that does not work". The Independent. Retrieved February 7, 2017.
- ^ Atwood, KC (2003). ""Neurocranial restructuring" and homeopathy, neither complementary nor alternative". Archives of Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery. 129 (12): 1356–57. doi:10.1001/archotol.129.12.1356. PMID 14676179.
- ^ Ndububa, VI (2007). "Medical quackery in Nigeria; why the silence?". Nigerian Journal of Medicine. 16 (4): 312–17. doi:10.4314/njm.v16i4.37328. PMID 18080586.
- ^ Ernst, E; Pittler, MH (1998). "Efficacy of homeopathic arnica: a systematic review of placebo-controlled clinical trials". Archives of Surgery. 133 (11): 1187–90. doi:10.1001/archsurg.133.11.1187. PMID 9820349.
- ^ Silverman, Rosa. "Homeopathy is 'rubbish', says chief medical officer". The Daily Telegraph. London. ISSN 0307-1235. OCLC 49632006. Archived from the original on January 26, 2013. Retrieved January 24, 2013.
- ^ Nick Collins (April 18, 2013). "Homeopathy is nonsense, says new chief scientist". The Daily Telegraph. Archived from the original on April 20, 2013.
- ^ Gray, Richard (April 9, 2013). "Homeopathy on the NHS is 'mad' says outgoing scientific adviser". The Telegraph. Archived from the original on January 11, 2022. Retrieved October 28, 2020.
- ^ a b c d Goldacre, Ben (2007). "Benefits and risks of homoeopathy". The Lancet. 370 (9600): 1672–73. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61706-1. PMID 18022024. S2CID 43588927.
- ^ Baum, Michael; Ernst, Edzard (2009). "Should We Maintain an Open Mind about Homeopathy?". The American Journal of Medicine. 122 (11): 973–74. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2009.03.038. PMID 19854319.
Homeopathy is among the worst examples of faith-based medicine... These axioms [of homeopathy] are not only out of line with scientific facts but also directly opposed to them. If homeopathy is correct, much of physics, chemistry, and pharmacology must be incorrect... To have an open mind about homeopathy or similarly implausible forms of alternative medicine (e.g., Bach Flower remedies, spiritual healing, crystal therapy) is, therefore, not an option
- ^ Grimes, D.R. (2012). "Proposed mechanisms for homeopathy are physically impossible". Focus on Alternative and Complementary Therapies. 17 (3): 149–55. doi:10.1111/j.2042-7166.2012.01162.x.
- ^ Barrett S (December 28, 2004). "Homeopathy: the ultimate fake". Quackwatch. Retrieved July 25, 2007.
- ^ Faziola L. "Dynamization and dilution". Homeopathy Tutorial. Creighton University School of Medicine. Archived from the original on August 26, 2002. Retrieved July 24, 2007.
- ^ a b Sam Jones, "Homeopathy protesters to take 'mass overdose' outside Boots", The Guardian, January 29, 2010
- ^ Maddox J (1988). "When to believe the unbelievable". Nature (editorial). 333 (6176): 1349–56. Bibcode:1988Natur.333Q.787.. doi:10.1038/333787a0. S2CID 4369459.
- ^ Maddox, J; Randi, J; Stewart, W (1988). ""High-dilution" experiments a delusion". Nature. 334 (6180): 287–91. Bibcode:1988Natur.334..287M. doi:10.1038/334287a0. PMID 2455869. S2CID 9579433.
- ^ a b Levy, G (1986). "Kinetics of drug action: An overview". Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 78 (4 Pt 2): 754–61. doi:10.1016/0091-6749(86)90057-6. PMID 3534056.
- ^ a b Smith K (2012). "Homeopathy is Unscientific and Unethical". Bioethics. 26 (9): 508–12. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2011.01956.x. S2CID 143067523.
- ^ Oberbaum, M; Singer, SR; Samuels, N. (July 2010). "Hormesis and homeopathy: bridge over troubled waters". Hum Exp Toxicol. 29 (7): 567–71. Bibcode:2010HETox..29..567O. doi:10.1177/0960327110369777. PMID 20558608. S2CID 8107797.
- ^ Khuda-Bukhsh, Anisur Rahman (2003). "Towards understanding molecular mechanisms of action of homeopathic drugs: an overview". Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry. 253 (1/2): 339–45. doi:10.1023/A:1026048907739. PMID 14619985. S2CID 10971539.
- ^ Brien S; Lachance S; Prescott P; McDermott C; Lewith G (June 2011). "Homeopathy has clinical benefits in rheumatoid arthritis patients that are attributable to the consultation process but not the homeopathic remedy: a randomized controlled clinical trial". Rheumatology. 50 (6): 1070–82. doi:10.1093/rheumatology/keq234. PMC 3093927. PMID 21076131.
- ^ Shelton, JW (2004). Homeopathy: How it really works. Amherst, New York: Prometheus Books. ISBN 978-1-59102-109-4.
- ^ Linde, K; Scholz, M; Ramirez, G; Clausius, N; Melchart, D; Jonas, WB (1999). "Impact of study quality on outcome in placebo-controlled trials of homeopathy". Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 52 (7): 631–36. doi:10.1016/S0895-4356(99)00048-7. PMID 10391656.
- ^ UK Parliamentary Committee Science and Technology Committee. "Evidence Check 2: Homeopathy"
- ^ a b c National Health and Medical Research Council (2015). NHMRC statement on homeopathy and NHMRC information paper – Evidence on the effectiveness of homeopathy for treating health conditions. Canberra: National Health and Medical Research Council. p. 16. ISBN 978-1-925129-29-8. Archived from the original on April 19, 2017. Retrieved August 18, 2016.
There is no reliable evidence that homoeopathy is effective for treating health conditions.
- ^ "Homeopathic products and practices: assessing the evidence and ensuring consistency in regulating medical claims in the EU" (PDF). European Academies' Science Advisory Council. September 2017. p. 1. Retrieved October 1, 2017.
... we agree with previous extensive evaluations concluding that there are no known diseases for which there is robust, reproducible evidence that homeopathy is effective beyond the placebo effect.
- ^ Bonhöft, Gudrun; Matthiessen, Peter (2012). Homeopathy in healthcare: effectiveness, appropriateness, safety, costs. Springer.
- ^ a b Shaw, David (May 2012). "The Swiss report on homeopathy: a case study of research misconduct". Swiss Medical Weekly. 142: w13594. doi:10.4414/smw.2012.13594. PMID 22653406.
- ^ Gurtner, Felix (December 2012). "The report "Homeopathy in healthcare: effectiveness, appropriateness, safety, costs" is not a "Swiss report"". Swiss Medical Weekly. 142: w13723. doi:10.4414/smw.2012.13723. PMID 23255156.
- ^ Liberati, A; Altman, DG; Tetzlaff, J; Mulrow, C; Gøtzsche, PC; Ioannidis, J PA; Clarke, M; Devereaux, PJ; Kleijnen, J; Moher, D (2009). "The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration". PLOS Medicine. 6 (7): e1000100. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100. PMC 2707010. PMID 19621070.
- ^ Jonas, WB; Anderson, RL; Crawford, CC; Lyons, JS (2001). "A systematic review of the quality of homeopathic clinical trials". BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 1: 12. doi:10.1186/1472-6882-1-12. PMC 64638. PMID 11801202.
- ^ Linde, K; Jonas, WB; Melchart, D; Willich, S (2001). "The methodological quality of randomized controlled trials of homeopathy, herbal medicines and acupuncture". International Journal of Epidemiology. 30 (3): 526–31. doi:10.1093/ije/30.3.526. PMID 11416076.
- ^ Jeffrey D. Scargle (2000). "Publication Bias: The "file-drawer problem" in scientific inference" (PDF). Journal of Scientific Exploration. 14 (2): 94–106. arXiv:physics/9909033. Bibcode:1999physics...9033S. Archived from the original (PDF) on January 22, 2015. Retrieved January 19, 2011.
- ^ Ioannidis, John P. A. (2005). "Why most published research findings are false". PLOS Medicine. 2 (8): e124. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124. PMC 1182327. PMID 16060722.
- ^ Kleijnen, J; Knipschild, P; Ter Riet, G (1991). "Clinical trials of homoeopathy". BMJ. 302 (6772): 316–23. doi:10.1136/bmj.302.6772.316. PMC 1668980. PMID 1825800.
- ^ Mathie, Robert T.; Ramparsad, Nitish; Legg, Lynn A.; Clausen, Jürgen; Moss, Sian; Davidson, Jonathan R. T.; Messow, Claudia-Martina; McConnachie, Alex (March 24, 2017). "Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of non-individualised homeopathic treatment: systematic review and meta-analysis". Systematic Reviews. 6 (1): 63. doi:10.1186/s13643-017-0445-3. ISSN 2046-4053. PMC 5366148. PMID 28340607.
- ^ a b "Health A-Z -- Homeopathy". National Health Service. Retrieved April 22, 2013.
- ^ AMA Council on Scientific Affairs (1997). "Alternative medicine: Report 12 of the Council on Scientific Affairs (A–97)". American Medical Association. Archived from the original on June 14, 2009. Retrieved March 25, 2009.
- ^ Weissmann, G (2006). "Homeopathy: Holmes, Hogwarts, and the Prince of Wales". The FASEB Journal. 20 (11): 1755–58. doi:10.1096/fj.06-0901ufm. PMID 16940145. S2CID 9305843.
- ^ "Homeopathy not a cure, says WHO". BBC News. August 20, 2009. Retrieved October 20, 2014.
- ^ Mashta, O (August 24, 2009). "WHO warns against using homoeopathy to treat serious diseases". BMJ. 339 (aug24 2): b3447. doi:10.1136/bmj.b3447. PMID 19703929. S2CID 9303173.
- ^ a b American College of Medical Toxicology; American Academy of Clinical Toxicology (February 2013). "Five things physicians and patients should question". Choosing Wisely: an initiative of the ABIM Foundation. American College of Medical Toxicology and American Academy of Clinical Toxicology. Retrieved December 5, 2013., which cites Woodward, KN (May 2005). "The potential impact of the use of homeopathic and herbal remedies on monitoring the safety of prescription products". Human & Experimental Toxicology. 24 (5): 219–33. Bibcode:2005HETox..24..219W. doi:10.1191/0960327105ht529oa. PMID 16004184. S2CID 34767417.
- ^ Kolisko L (1959). Physiologischer und physikalischer Nachweis der Wirksamkeit kleinster Entitäten [Physiological and physical evidence of the effectiveness of the smallest entities] (in German). Stuttgart.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) - ^ Walach, H; Köster, H; Hennig, T; Haag, G (2001). "The effects of homeopathic belladonna 30CH in healthy volunteers – a randomized, double-blind experiment". Journal of Psychosomatic Research. 50 (3): 155–60. doi:10.1016/S0022-3999(00)00224-5. PMID 11316508.
- ^ Hirst, SJ; Hayes, NA; Burridge, J; Pearce, FL; Foreman, JC (1993). "Human basophil degranulation is not triggered by very dilute antiserum against human IgE". Nature. 366 (6455): 525–27. Bibcode:1993Natur.366..525H. doi:10.1038/366525a0. PMID 8255290. S2CID 4314547.
- ^ Ovelgönne, J. H.; Bol, AWJM; Hop, WCJ; Wijk, R (1992). "Mechanical agitation of very dilute antiserum against IgE has no effect on basophil staining properties". Experientia. 48 (5): 504–08. doi:10.1007/BF01928175. PMID 1376282. S2CID 32110713.
- ^ Witt, Claudia M; Bluth, M; Hinderlich, S; Albrecht, H; Ludtke, R; Weisshuhn, Thorolf ER; Willich, Stefan N (2006). "Does potentized HgCl2 (mercurius corrosivus) affect the activity of diastase and amylase?". Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine. 12 (4): 359–65. doi:10.1089/acm.2006.12.359. PMID 16722785.
- ^ Guggisberg, A; Baumgartner, S; Tschopp, C; Heusser, P (2005). "Replication study concerning the effects of homeopathic dilutions of histamine on human basophil degranulation in vitro". Complementary Therapies in Medicine. 13 (2): 91–100. doi:10.1016/j.ctim.2005.04.003. PMID 16036166.
- ^ Vickers, AJ (December 1999). "Independent replication of pre-clinical research in homeopathy: a systematic review". Forschende Komplementärmedizin. 6 (6): 311–20. doi:10.1159/000021286. PMID 10649002. S2CID 22051466.
- ^ Brown, V; Ennis, M (April 2001). "Flow-cytometric analysis of basophil activation: inhibition by histamine at conventional and homeopathic concentrations". Inflammation Research. 50 (Suppl 2): S47–48. doi:10.1007/PL00022402. PMID 11411598. S2CID 10880180.
- ^ Cumps, J.; Ennis, M.; Mannaioni, P. F.; Roberfroid, M.; Sainte-Laudy, J.; Wiegant, F.A.C.; Belon, P. (April 1, 2004). "Histamine dilutions modulate basophil activation". Inflammation Research. 53 (5): 181–88. doi:10.1007/s00011-003-1242-0. PMID 15105967. S2CID 8682416.
- ^ "Homeopathy: The Test". BBC. Retrieved April 29, 2015.
- ^ Witt, CM; Bluth, M; Albrecht, H; Weisshuhn, TE; Baumgartner, S; Willich, SN (June 2007). "The in vitro evidence for an effect of high homeopathic potencies--a systematic review of the literature". Complementary Therapies in Medicine. 15 (2): 128–38. doi:10.1016/j.ctim.2007.01.011. PMID 17544864.
- ^ Davenas, E.; Beauvais, F.; Amara, J.; Oberbaum, M.; Robinzon, B.; Miadonnai, A.; Tedeschi, A.; Pomeranz, B.; Fortner, P.; Belon, P.; Sainte-Laudy, J. (1988). "Human basophil degranulation triggered by very dilute antiserum against IgE". Nature. 333 (6176): 816–818. Bibcode:1988Natur.333..816D. doi:10.1038/333816a0. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 2455231. S2CID 12992106.
- ^ Maddox, J; Randi, J; Stewart, W (1988). ""High-dilution" experiments a delusion". Nature. 334 (6180): 287–91. Bibcode:1988Natur.334..287M. doi:10.1038/334287a0. PMID 2455869. S2CID 9579433.
- ^ Sullivan W (July 27, 1988). "Water that has a memory? Skeptics win second round". The New York Times. Retrieved October 3, 2007.
- ^ Benveniste defended his results by comparing the inquiry to the Salem witch hunts and asserting that "It may be that all of us are wrong in good faith. This is no crime but science as usual and only the future knows."
- ^ Shaw, DM (2010). "Homeopathy is where the harm is: Five unethical effects of funding unscientific 'remedies'". Journal of Medical Ethics. 36 (3): 130–31. doi:10.1136/jme.2009.034959. PMID 20211989. S2CID 206996446.
- ^ Shaw, David (November 4, 2010). "Homeopathy and medical ethics". Focus on Alternative and Complementary Therapies. 16 (1). Wiley: 17–21. doi:10.1111/j.2042-7166.2010.01051.x. ISSN 1465-3753.
- ^ Hilly Janes (September 6, 2008). "The Lifestyle 50: The top fifty people who influence the way we eat, exercise and think about ourselves". The Times. Archived from the original on July 27, 2011.
- ^ Memorandum submitted by Edzard Ernst HO 16 to the House of Lords
- ^ Boseley S (July 21, 2008). "The alternative professor". The Guardian. London.
- ^ "Complementary therapies: The big con?". The Independent. London. April 22, 2008. Archived from the original on April 27, 2009. Retrieved May 4, 2010.
- ^ Sample I (July 21, 2008). "Pharmacists urged to 'tell the truth' about homeopathic remedies". The Guardian. London.
- ^ "ASA adjudication on Society of Homeopaths". ASA. July 3, 2013. Archived from the original on July 6, 2013. Retrieved July 4, 2013.
- ^ "Court imposes penalty for false or misleading claims by Homeopathy Plus and Ms Frances Sheffield". ACCC. October 14, 2015. Retrieved March 31, 2016.
- ^ Dantas, F; Rampes, H (2000). "Do homeopathic medicines provoke adverse effects? A systematic review". British Homoeopathic Journal. 89: S35–S38. doi:10.1054/homp.1999.0378. PMID 10939781. S2CID 24738819.
- ^ a b Posadzki, P; Alotaibi, A; Ernst, E (2012). "Adverse effects of homeopathy: A systematic review of published case reports and case series". International Journal of Clinical Practice. 66 (12): 1178–88. doi:10.1111/ijcp.12026. PMID 23163497. S2CID 2930768.
- ^ Stub, T; Musial, F; Kristoffersen, AA; Alræk, T; Liu, J (June 2016). "Adverse effects of homeopathy, what do we know? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials" (PDF). Complementary Therapies in Medicine. 26: 146–63. doi:10.1016/j.ctim.2016.03.013. hdl:10037/10908. PMID 27261996.
- ^ Chakraborti, D; Mukherjee, SC; Saha, KC; Chowdhury, UK; Rahman, MM; Sengupta, MK (2003). "Arsenic toxicity from homeopathic treatment". Journal of Toxicology. Clinical Toxicology. 41 (7): 963–67. doi:10.1081/CLT-120026518. PMID 14705842. S2CID 25453468.
- ^ Sources:
- Julianne Pepitone (June 16, 2009). "Zicam may damage sense of smell – FDA". CNNMoney.com.
- "Information on Zicam Cold Remedy nasal gel, Zicam Cold Remedy nasal swabs, and Zicam Cold Remedy swabs, kids size". FDA. June 16, 2009.
- ^ "Homeopathic Teething Tablets and Gels: FDA Warning – Risk to Infants and Children". FDA. September 30, 2016. Retrieved October 17, 2016.
- ^ "FDA warns against the use of homeopathic teething tablets and gels". FDA. September 30, 2016. Retrieved October 17, 2016.
- ^ Mole, Beth (October 13, 2016). "FDA: Homeopathic teething gels may have killed 10 babies, sickened 400". Ars Technica UK. Retrieved October 17, 2016.
- ^ Altunc, U.; Pittler, M. H.; Ernst, E (2007). "Homeopathy for childhood and adolescence ailments: systematic review of randomized clinical trials". Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 82 (1): 69–75. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.456.5352. doi:10.4065/82.1.69. PMID 17285788.
However, homeopathy is not totally devoid of risks... it may delay effective treatment or diagnosis
- ^ Malik, IA; Gopalan, S (2002). "Use of CAM results in delay in seeking medical advice for breast cancer". European Journal of Epidemiology. 18 (8): 817–22. doi:10.1023/A:1025343720564. PMID 12974558. S2CID 19059757.
CAM use [in the developing countries this study solely considered] was associated with delay in seeking medical advice (OR: 5.6; 95% CI: 2.3, 13.3) and presentation at an advanced stage of disease
- ^ a b Ernst, E; White, AR (1995). "Homoeopathy and immunization". The British Journal of General Practice. 45 (400): 629–30. PMC 1239445. PMID 8554846.
- ^ a b c Jones M (July 14, 2006). "Malaria advice 'risks lives'". Newsnight. BBC Television. Retrieved March 24, 2009.
- ^ "Memorandum #2. Homeopathy as pseudoscience". Commission on Pseudoscience. February 7, 2017. Retrieved March 19, 2021.
- ^ Case of Baby Gloria, who died in 2002:
- "Homeopath Thomas Sam guilty of daughter Gloria's death". The Daily Telegraph. Sydney. June 5, 2009. Archived from the original on November 18, 2012. Retrieved March 17, 2010.
- "Parents guilty of manslaughter over daughter's eczema death". The Canberra Times. June 5, 2009. Archived from the original on June 25, 2010.
- ^ a b Alastair Neil Hope; State Coroner. "Coroner's inquest into the death of Penelope Dingle. Ref No: 17/10".
- ^ Schmukler AV (2006). Homeopathy: An A to Z Home Handbook. Llewellyn Worldwide. p. 16. ISBN 978-0-7387-0873-7.
- ^ Campbell A (October 1978). "The science of homoeopathy, by G. Vithoulkas". British Homoeopathic Journal (book review). 67 (4): 299–301. doi:10.1016/S0007-0785(78)80061-1. S2CID 69144584.
- ^ Birnbaum NR, Goldschmidt RH, Buffett WO (1999). "Resolving the common clinical dilemmas of syphilis". American Family Physician. 59 (8): 2233–40, 2245–46. PMID 10221308. Archived from the original on June 6, 2011. Retrieved September 3, 2007.
- ^ "Is bad homeopathic advice putting travellers at risk?". Newsnight. BBC. January 5, 2011. Retrieved January 10, 2015.
- ^ Ernst, E. (1997). "The attitude against immunisation within some branches of complementary medicine". European Journal of Pediatrics. 156 (7): 513–15. doi:10.1007/s004310050650. PMID 9243229. S2CID 25420567.
- ^ Ernst, E (2001). "Rise in popularity of complementary and alternative medicine: reasons and consequences for vaccination". Vaccine. 20: S90–93, discussion S89. doi:10.1016/S0264-410X(01)00290-0. PMID 11587822.
- ^ Pray WS (1996). "The challenge to professionalism presented by homeopathy". American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. 60 (2): 198–204. doi:10.1016/S0002-9459(24)04582-0.
- ^ Pray WS (1992). "A challenge to the credibility of homeopathy". American Journal of Pain Management (2): 63–71.
- ^ English, J (1992). "The issue of immunization". British Homoeopathic Journal. 81 (4): 161–63. doi:10.1016/S0007-0785(05)80171-1. S2CID 71502677.
- ^ "Vaccine alternatives offered by homeopaths 'irresponsible'". Marketplace. CBC. November 28, 2014. Retrieved January 10, 2015.
- ^ Poling, Samantha (September 13, 2010). "Doctors warn over homeopathic 'vaccines'". BBC. Retrieved January 10, 2015.
- ^ "Court finds Homeopathy Plus! vaccine claims misleading". Australian Competition and Consumer Commission. December 23, 2014. Retrieved January 10, 2015.
- ^ Rushton, Katherine; Foggo, Daniel; Barnes, Sophie (November 1, 2019). "Homeopaths warning mothers not to have children vaccinated, investigation reveals". The Daily Telegraph. ISSN 0307-1235. Archived from the original on January 11, 2022. Retrieved November 3, 2019.
- ^ a b Jha A (July 14, 2006). "Homeopaths 'endangering lives' by offering malaria remedies". The Guardian. London.
- ^ a b Starr, M. (2000). "Malaria affects children and pregnant women most". BMJ. 321 (7271): 1288. doi:10.1136/bmj.321.7271.1288. PMC 1119021. PMID 11082103.
- ^ Coffman, Becky (January 28, 2019). "A cautionary tale: the risks of unproven antimalarials". Centers for Disease Control. Archived from the original on March 24, 2014.
- ^ Pray WS (2006). "Ethical, scientific, and educational concerns with unproven medications". American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. 70 (6): 141. doi:10.5688/aj7006141. PMC 1803699. PMID 17332867.
- ^ a b c d e "Legal Status of Traditional Medicine and Complementary/Alternative Medicine: A Worldwide Review" (PDF). World Health Organization. 2001. Archived from the original (PDF) on September 27, 2009. Retrieved September 1, 2020.
- ^ a b "WHO global report on traditional and complementary medicine 2019" (PDF). WHO. June 4, 2019. Retrieved September 4, 2020.
- ^ Green, Chris (August 2, 2017). "Scotland urged to stop funding homeopathy on NHS". iNews. Retrieved January 18, 2020.
- ^ Clarinval, France. "Homeopathy to remain reimbursable in Luxembourg". today.rt.lu. RTL Today. Retrieved May 4, 2020.
- ^ Hauptverband der österreichischen Sozialversicherungsträger (March 31, 2004). "Liste nicht erstattungsfähiger Arzneimittelkategorien gemäß § 351c Abs. 2 ASVG (List of treatments not reimbursable by social service providers in Austria)" (in German). Archived from the original on July 6, 2011.
- ^ Rechtssatz (legal rule), RS0083796 (in German) (Oberster Gerichtshof (Austrian supreme court) February 28, 1994).
- ^ a b c d e "In Germany, a Heated Debate Over Homeopathy". Undark Magazine. March 16, 2020. Retrieved September 2, 2020.
- ^ "The end of homoeopathy". The Lancet. 366 (9487): 690. 2005. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67149-8. PMID 16125567. S2CID 6115077.
- ^ Dacey J (January 14, 2011). "Alternative therapies are put to the test". swissinfo.ch. Archived from the original on April 22, 2014. Retrieved January 17, 2011.
- ^ Tagesschau (January 11, 2024). ""Homöopathie macht als Kassenleistung keinen Sinn"". tagesschau.de. Retrieved January 18, 2024.
- ^ a b "Homeopathy". nhs.uk. October 18, 2017. Retrieved September 2, 2020.
- ^ "Homeopathy". nhs.uk. October 18, 2017. Retrieved January 18, 2020.
- ^ Donnelly, Laura; Taylor, Rosie (April 5, 2019). "NHS still spending £55,000 a year on homeopathy, despite ban". The Telegraph. ISSN 0307-1235. Archived from the original on January 11, 2022. Retrieved January 18, 2020.
- ^ "Diluting misleading claims – ASA update". Nightingale Collaboration. September 29, 2016. Retrieved September 30, 2016.
- ^ "Advertising standards for homeopathy". Advertising Standards Authority. September 29, 2016. Retrieved September 30, 2016.
- ^ CAP Compliance Team (September 28, 2016). "Advertising standsards for homeopaths" (PDF). Committee of Advertising Practice. Archived from the original (PDF) on October 3, 2016. Retrieved September 30, 2016.
- ^ "Bristol Homeopathic Hospital To Cease Offering Homeopathic Treatments". Good Thinking. June 5, 2015. Retrieved April 29, 2016.
- ^ Cardwell, Mark (June 10, 2015). "Homeopathy services will no longer be available at Bristol NHS Trust hospitals". Bristol Post. Archived from the original on September 28, 2015. Retrieved April 29, 2016.
- ^ a b c Commander, Emily (October 1, 2018). "Snake oil or science? Homeopathy in Europe". euronews. Retrieved September 4, 2020.
- ^ "Alternative System of Health Care". Government of India. Archived from the original on January 2, 2010. Retrieved January 15, 2010.
- ^ "AYUSH". Government of India. website. Archived from the original on August 22, 2013.
- ^ "Kerala AYUSH department- Final nod". Homoeoscan. June 4, 2015. Retrieved October 1, 2017.
- ^ "Professional Councils". University Grants Commission (UGC) website. Archived from the original on January 6, 2010.
- ^ "The Homoeopathy Central Council Act, 1973, s. 15 and Sch. II". Central Council of Homeopathy, India. Archived from the original on November 23, 2009. Retrieved January 18, 2010.
- ^ "Govt asked to set up university to promote homoeopathy".
- ^ MANDHANI, APOORVA (August 8, 2017). "Gujarat HC Quashes Rules Permitting Common Counselling By State For Management Quota Seats in Ayurveda Colleges [Read Judgment]". Live Law.
- ^ "Alternative Medicine: Emerging Careers". northeasttoday.in. March 23, 2017. Archived from the original on January 8, 2018. Retrieved March 4, 2021.
- ^ "Statistical Yearbook of Bangladesh". 2012.
- ^ "Bangladesh Homoeopathy Board – Bangladesh Homoeopathy Board".
- ^ Raghu Korrapati, Dr (July 6, 2017). Educational Equivalency Analysis: India & USA Degrees: 108 India Degrees and Equivalency to USA degrees. Diamond Pocket Books Pvt. ISBN 978-93-5278-117-1.
- ^ "Practicing & Studying Homeopathy". The National Center for Homeopathy. Archived from the original on April 14, 2021. Retrieved September 2, 2020.
- ^ Frazier, Kendrick (2015). "CFI testimony urges FDA to regulate homeopathic products". Skeptical Inquirer. 39 (4): 6–7.
- ^ De Dora, Michael (April 20, 2015). "Homeopathic product regulation: evaluating the Food and Drug Administration's regulatory framework after a quarter-century. Testimony of the Center for Inquiry to the Food and Drug Administration" (PDF). FDA.
- ^ "FTC: Enforcement Policy Statement on Marketing Claims for OTC Homeopathic Drugs" (PDF). Federal Trade Commission. Retrieved November 18, 2016.
- ^ "Homeopathic Medicine & Advertising Workshop Report" (PDF). Federal Trade Commission. Retrieved November 18, 2016.
- ^ "FDA Toughens Enforcement of Homeopathic Products". The National Law Review. Retrieved September 2, 2020.
- ^ Research, Center for Drug Evaluation and (July 22, 2020). "Homeopathic Products". FDA.
- ^ Kirkey, Sharon (February 8, 2018). "'A pseudo-science': Outrage after Ontario government funds college program in homeopathy". National Post. Retrieved September 2, 2020.
- ^ Canada, Health (October 26, 2006). "Evidence for Homeopathic Medicines". aem. Retrieved September 4, 2020.
- ^ "Drugstore remedies: Licence to Deceive". CBC. March 13, 2015.
- ^ "Regulation of homoeopathic and anthroposophic medicines in Australia". Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA). September 1, 2008. Retrieved September 1, 2020.
- ^ "Review of Pharmacy Remuneration and Regulation Final Report" (PDF). 2017. Archived from the original (PDF) on March 4, 2021. Retrieved September 1, 2020.
- ^ "AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENT RESPONSE TO THE REVIEW OF PHARMACY REMUNERATION AND REGULATION" (PDF). 2018. Archived from the original (PDF) on March 3, 2021. Retrieved September 1, 2020.
- ^ "Natural health products". Ministry of Health NZ. Retrieved September 1, 2020.
- ^ "Doctors and CAM (complementary and alternative medicine)" (PDF). MEDICAL COUNCIL OF NEW ZEALAND. 2017. Archived from the original (PDF) on January 29, 2021. Retrieved September 1, 2020.
- ^ Holt, Shaun; Gilbey, Andrew; Colquhoun; David; Baum, Michael; Ernst, Edzard (April 15, 2011). "Call for doctors not to practice homeopathy or refer to homeopaths". New Zealand Medical Journal. 124 (1332): 87–88. ISSN 1175-8716. PMID 21747430.
- ^ "Homeopathy". NCCIH. Retrieved September 2, 2020.
- ^ Fox, Maggie (2017). "Homeopathic products useless and often even harmful, FDA says". NBC News. Retrieved September 4, 2020.
- ^ Rudra, Shalini; Kalra, Aakshi; Kumar, Abhishek; Joe, William (2017). "Utilization of alternative systems of medicine as health care services in India: Evidence on AYUSH care from NSS 2014". PLOS ONE. 12 (5): e0176916. Bibcode:2017PLoSO..1276916R. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0176916. PMC 5417584. PMID 28472197.
- ^ Lu, Di (September 20, 2019). "'Homoeopathy flourishes in the far East': A forgotten history of homeopathy in late nineteenth-century China". Notes and Records: The Royal Society Journal of the History of Science. 73 (3): 329–351. doi:10.1098/rsnr.2018.0041. S2CID 80714173.
- ^ Saxton, J (2007). "The diversity of veterinary homeopathy". Homeopathy. 96 (1): 3. doi:10.1016/j.homp.2006.11.010. PMID 17227741. S2CID 3715861.
- ^ Doehring, C.; Sundrum, A. (December 17, 2016). "Efficacy of homeopathy in livestock according to peer-reviewed publications from 1981 to 2014". The Veterinary Record. 179 (24): 628. doi:10.1136/vr.103779. ISSN 0042-4900. PMC 5256414. PMID 27956476.
- ^ Lees, P.; Pelligand, L.; Whiting, M.; Chambers, D.; Toutain, P-L.; Whitehead, M.L. (August 19, 2017). "Comparison of veterinary drugs and veterinary homeopathy: part 2". The Veterinary Record. 181 (8): 198–207. doi:10.1136/vr.104279. ISSN 0042-4900. PMC 5738588. PMID 28821700.
In human medicine, there may be a place for the counselling/psychotherapeutic aspects of homeopathic consults and the placebo effects generated by homeopathic products in patients who believe in such treatments, but in veterinary medicine these factors are unlikely to benefit patients, and the use of homeopathic products in veterinary medicine is contrary to best evidence, irrational, and inconsistent with current scientific and medical knowledge
- ^ a b Hektoen, L (2005). "Review of the current involvement of homeopathy in veterinary practice and research". Veterinary Record. 157 (8): 224–29. doi:10.1136/vr.157.8.224. PMID 16113167. S2CID 12525634.
- ^ Lees, P.; Pelligand, L.; Whiting, M.; Chambers, D.; Toutain, P-L.; Whitehead, M. L. (August 12, 2017). "Comparison of veterinary drugs and veterinary homeopathy: part 1". The Veterinary Record. 181 (7): 170–176. doi:10.1136/vr.104278. ISSN 0042-4900. PMC 5738587. PMID 28801498.
- ^ Whitehead, M L; Lees, P; Toutain, P L (2018). "Veterinary homeopathy regulation in the UK – a cause for concern". Regulatory Rapporteur. 15: 21–25.
- ^ Mathie, RT; Clausen, J (October 18, 2014). "Veterinary homeopathy: systematic review of medical conditions studied by randomised placebo-controlled trials". The Veterinary Record. 175 (15): 373–81. doi:10.1136/vr.101767. PMID 25324413. S2CID 22894207.
- ^ Mathie, RT; Clausen, J (September 15, 2015). "Veterinary homeopathy: systematic review of medical conditions studied by randomised trials controlled by other than placebo". BMC Veterinary Research. 11: 236. doi:10.1186/s12917-015-0542-2. PMC 4570221. PMID 26371366.
- ^ Doehring, C.; Sundrum, A. (December 12, 2016). "Efficacy of homeopathy in livestock according to peer-reviewed publications from 1981 to 2014". Veterinary Record. 179 (24): vetrec–2016–103779. doi:10.1136/vr.103779. ISSN 2042-7670. PMC 5256414. PMID 27956476.
- ^ "Alternative pet remedies: Government clampdown".
- ^ "Veterinary medicines". British Veterinary Association. Retrieved January 5, 2015.
- ^ "Ineffective therapies". Australian veterinary association. Archived from the original on February 7, 2015. Retrieved January 5, 2015.
External links
- Homeopathy (NHS Choices, UK)