Wikipedia:WikiProject History/Assessment: Difference between revisions
Gog the Mild (talk | contribs) Joining |
|||
Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
===Tasks, items, notes, comments or questions=== |
===Tasks, items, notes, comments or questions=== |
||
* [[Kevin M. Kruse]] - The article is currently ranked Stub-class, I expanded it a bit. [[User:Isi96|Isi96]] ([[User talk:Isi96|talk]]) 04:16, 6 June 2021 (UTC) |
|||
{{empty section}} |
|||
==Popular pages== |
==Popular pages== |
Revision as of 04:16, 6 June 2021
Main page | Discussion page | Sub-pages index | Article Alerts | Assessment | Review | Collaboration | Task Forces | Outreach | Members | Popular pages |
Review Desk | Review Coordination | A-class review | Article assessment |
Working Groups at WikiProject History:
Assessment · Collaboration · Review · Outreach · Task forces
The History Assessment Department |
Working Groups at WikiProject History:
Assessment · Collaboration · Review · Outreach · Task forces
The History Assessment Department, supported by WikiProject History, finds historical articles for the first time and rates them on quality and importance scales. A template is then placed on the article's talk page stating that the article is within the scope of WikiProject History and displaying what rating the article has been given.
Historical articles can be found in Category:History and its subcategories.
Participants
Current active members:
Please feel free to add your name to join!!!!
Quality statistics
History articles by quality and importance | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Quality | Importance | |||||||
Top | High | Mid | Low | NA | Other | ??? | Total | |
FA | 5 | 14 | 25 | 39 | 263 | 3 | 349 | |
FL | 3 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 19 | ||
A | 2 | 6 | 19 | 1 | 28 | |||
GA | 11 | 38 | 94 | 172 | 1 | 736 | 41 | 1,093 |
B | 64 | 232 | 323 | 822 | 1,986 | 434 | 3,861 | |
C | 105 | 314 | 625 | 2,202 | 7 | 3,960 | 987 | 8,200 |
Start | 31 | 187 | 577 | 4,328 | 6 | 10,653 | 2,216 | 17,998 |
Stub | 1 | 33 | 152 | 3,039 | 5 | 6,104 | 2,052 | 11,386 |
List | 5 | 73 | 211 | 7,289 | 12 | 1,495 | 453 | 9,538 |
Category | 28,955 | 4,301 | 33,256 | |||||
Disambig | 62 | 30 | 92 | |||||
File | 50 | 45 | 95 | |||||
Portal | 531 | 11 | 542 | |||||
Project | 65 | 13 | 78 | |||||
Redirect | 9 | 71 | 110 | 1,137 | 332 | 1,659 | ||
Template | 1,125 | 147 | 1,272 | |||||
NA | 1 | 16 | 412 | 1 | 430 | |||
Other | 658 | 658 | ||||||
Assessed | 222 | 903 | 2,086 | 18,012 | 32,630 | 30,511 | 6,190 | 90,554 |
Unassessed | 11 | 3 | 39 | 424 | 477 | |||
Total | 222 | 903 | 2,086 | 18,023 | 32,633 | 30,550 | 6,614 | 91,031 |
WikiWork factors (?) | ω = 204,927 | Ω = 4.77 |
Notes
Please feel free to leave any notes at all in this section, regarding articles to be assessed, items to discuss, tasks to be done, or anything else.
please add your signature to any items that you add or any other text that you add on this page. that makes it much easier for active members of this project to help each other, to work on common projects and to assist each other. thanks. --Sm8900 (talk) 15:49, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Tasks, items, notes, comments or questions
- Kevin M. Kruse - The article is currently ranked Stub-class, I expanded it a bit. Isi96 (talk) 04:16, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
Popular pages
There is a list of list of popular pages, ordered by number of views, a bot-generated list of pageviews, useful for focused cleanup of frequently viewed articles.
Template
History Unassessed | ||||||||||
|
This template is used on many pages and changes may be widely noticed. Test changes in the template's /sandbox or /testcases subpages, or in your own user subpage. Consider discussing changes on the talk page before implementing them. |
Usage
The following is the full syntax used for placing this template on a talk page:
{{WikiProject History
|class=
|importance=
|attention=
|auto=
|needs-infobox=
|Contemporary History=
|Contemporary history-importance=
}}
Parameters
- class – a rating of the article's quality; see the quality scale for more details.
- importance – a rating of the article's quality; see the importance scale for more details.
- attention – "yes" if the article is extremely low quality and requires the attention of experienced editors.
- auto – used by bots if the article has been assessed automatically
- needs-infobox – "yes" if the article requires an infobox
- Contemporary History – "yes" if the Contemporary History task force applies
- Contemporary history-importance – see "importance" parameter above
See also
Quality scale
Featured articles
Reserved for articles that meet the featured article criteria and have received featured article status after community review
Featured articles are selected at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates
A-Class
Reserved for articles that have received A-Class status after review by the project. Such articles are expected to largely meet the featured article criteria, and must be comprehensive, accurate, well-sourced, and decently-written.
A-Class articles are selected by the project at Wikipedia:WikiProject History/Review#A-Class Review.
Good articles
Reserved for articles that meet the good article criteria and have received good article status.
Good articles are selected at Wikipedia:Good article nominations.
B-Class
The article meets the following six criteria:
- It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited.
- It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies.
- It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content.
- It is free from major grammatical errors.
- It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams.
- It is written from a neutral point of view
Start Class
Start class article have a few paragraphs that provide all the key points but may not cover all aspects of the subject. These articles usually have an image or infobox to support the text.
Start-class articles are selected by individual assessors.
Stub Class
Stubs are very short articles which offer a quick description of the subject
Stub articles are selected by individual assessors
Importance scale
Need | The article's priority or importance, regardless of its quality |
Top | Subject is a must-have for a good encyclopedia |
High | Subject contributes a depth of knowledge |
Mid | Subject fills in more minor details |
Low | Subject is mainly of specialist interest. |