Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doublemoon: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
m Listing on WP:DELSORT under Business |
→Doublemoon: smh |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
::i'd say keep... their catalog may be niché, but it certainly is pretty impressive. [[User:Candymoan|Candymoan]] ([[User talk:Candymoan|talk]]) 13:16, 4 January 2012 (UTC) |
::i'd say keep... their catalog may be niché, but it certainly is pretty impressive. [[User:Candymoan|Candymoan]] ([[User talk:Candymoan|talk]]) 13:16, 4 January 2012 (UTC) |
||
:::It would help if you could explain why the list makes Doublemoon notable. Organisations and companies need to have significant coverage in reliable sources to be [[WP:N|notable]]. [[User:Sionk|Sionk]] ([[User talk:Sionk|talk]]) 17:10, 4 January 2012 (UTC) |
:::It would help if you could explain why the list makes Doublemoon notable. Organisations and companies need to have significant coverage in reliable sources to be [[WP:N|notable]]. [[User:Sionk|Sionk]] ([[User talk:Sionk|talk]]) 17:10, 4 January 2012 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep''' Try clicking the · books · link in the findsources template, or indeed the · news · one. [[Special:Contributions/86.44.31.213|86.44.31.213]] ([[User talk:86.44.31.213|talk]]) 22:03, 9 January 2012 (UTC) |
|||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Turkey|list of Turkey-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>[[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 00:11, 5 January 2012 (UTC)</small> |
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Turkey|list of Turkey-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>[[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 00:11, 5 January 2012 (UTC)</small> |
||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Music|list of Music-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>[[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 00:11, 5 January 2012 (UTC)</small> |
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Music|list of Music-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>[[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 00:11, 5 January 2012 (UTC)</small> |
Revision as of 22:03, 9 January 2012
- Doublemoon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable record label/company. Was initially a 1 line stub until user 'Doublemoon' wrote the remainder of the article between 2007-09. No independent sources. No WP article exists on Turkish WP for Doublemoon or its parent company. I can find no significant online coverage that isn't a mirror of the English WP article. NB all the signed artists are non-notable and/or self-cited. Sionk (talk) 12:58, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
- i'd say keep... their catalog may be niché, but it certainly is pretty impressive. Candymoan (talk) 13:16, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
- It would help if you could explain why the list makes Doublemoon notable. Organisations and companies need to have significant coverage in reliable sources to be notable. Sionk (talk) 17:10, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
- i'd say keep... their catalog may be niché, but it certainly is pretty impressive. Candymoan (talk) 13:16, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
- Keep Try clicking the · books · link in the findsources template, or indeed the · news · one. 86.44.31.213 (talk) 22:03, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:11, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:11, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:12, 5 January 2012 (UTC)