Jump to content

Implicant: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Nviladkar (talk | contribs)
External links: Added a link to examples of finding essential prime implicants using K-map.
Ceklock (talk | contribs)
m correcao de texto
Line 12: Line 12:
is implied by <math>xy</math>, by <math>xyz</math>, by <math>xyzw</math>, by <math>w</math> and many others; these are the implicants of <math>f</math>.
is implied by <math>xy</math>, by <math>xyz</math>, by <math>xyzw</math>, by <math>w</math> and many others; these are the implicants of <math>f</math>.
== Prime implicant ==
== Prime implicant ==
A '''prime implicant''' of a function is an implicant that cannot be covered by a more general (more reduced - meaning with fewer [[literal]]s) implicant. [[W.V. Quine]] defined a ''prime implicant'' of ''F'' to be an implicant that is minimal - that is, if the removal of any literal from ''P'' results in a non-implicant for ''F''. '''Essential prime implicants''' are prime implicants that cover an output of the function that no combination of other prime implicants is able to cover.
A '''prime implicant''' of a function is an implicant that cannot be covered by a more general (more reduced - meaning with fewer [[literal]]s) implicant. [[W.V. Quine]] defined a ''prime implicant'' of ''F'' to be an implicant that is minimal - that is, the removal of any literal from ''P'' results in a non-implicant for ''F''. '''Essential prime implicants''' are prime implicants that cover an output of the function that no combination of other prime implicants is able to cover.


Using the example above, one can easily see that while <math>xy</math> (and others) is a prime implicant, <math>xyz</math> and <math>xyzw</math> are not. From the latter, multiple literals can be removed to make it prime:
Using the example above, one can easily see that while <math>xy</math> (and others) is a prime implicant, <math>xyz</math> and <math>xyzw</math> are not. From the latter, multiple literals can be removed to make it prime:

Revision as of 21:26, 1 April 2012

In Boolean logic, an implicant is a "covering" (sum term or product term) of one or more minterms in a sum of products (or maxterms in a product of sums) of a boolean function. Formally, a product term P in a sum of products is an implicant of the Boolean function F if P implies F. More precisely:

P implies F (and thus is an implicant of F) if F also takes the value 1 whenever P equals 1.

where

This means that PF with respect to the natural ordering of the Boolean space. For instance, the function

is implied by , by , by , by and many others; these are the implicants of .

Prime implicant

A prime implicant of a function is an implicant that cannot be covered by a more general (more reduced - meaning with fewer literals) implicant. W.V. Quine defined a prime implicant of F to be an implicant that is minimal - that is, the removal of any literal from P results in a non-implicant for F. Essential prime implicants are prime implicants that cover an output of the function that no combination of other prime implicants is able to cover.

Using the example above, one can easily see that while (and others) is a prime implicant, and are not. From the latter, multiple literals can be removed to make it prime:

  • , and can be removed, yielding .
  • Alternatively, and can be removed, yielding .
  • Finally, and can be removed, yielding .

The process of removing literals from a Boolean term is called expanding the term. Expanding by one literal doubles the number of input combinations for which the term is true (in binary Boolean algebra). Using the example function above, we may expand to or to without changing the cover of . [1]

The sum of all prime implicants of a Boolean function is called the complete sum of that function.

See also

References

  1. ^ De Micheli, Giovanni. Synthesis and Optimization of Digital Circuits. McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1994