Talk:Hermann Joseph Muller: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 10:00, 2 August 2017

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

History of Science Mid‑importance

	History of science portal This article is part of the History of Science WikiProject, an attempt to improve and organize the history of science content on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. You can also help with the History of Science Collaboration of the Month.History of ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject History of ScienceTemplate:WikiProject History of Sciencehistory of science
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biophysics (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biophysics, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.BiophysicsWikipedia:WikiProject BiophysicsTemplate:WikiProject BiophysicsBiophysics

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

United States: Indiana / Texas / University of Texas at Austin Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Indiana portal This article is supported by WikiProject Indiana (assessed as Low-importance).
	Texas portal This article is supported by WikiProject Texas (assessed as Low-importance).
	Texas portal This article is supported by WikiProject Texas - University of Texas at Austin (assessed as Low-importance).

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

New York (state): Columbia University Low‑importance

	New York (state) portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state)
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Columbia University (assessed as Low-importance).

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Physiology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysiologyWikipedia:WikiProject PhysiologyTemplate:WikiProject PhysiologyPhysiology
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article has been classified as relating to the field of physiology.

Untitled

He was also an eugenicist.See this site: [Eugenics manifesto].Agre22 (talk) 21:02, 9 May 2009 (UTC)agre22[reply]

Dobzhansky-Muller

I think that one of the important contributions Muller made to biology was the Dobzhansky-Muller Model of hybrid incompatibility. I'm not even sure there is a wikipedia entry on this. There is one on Bateson-Dobzhansky-Muller Model, but this doesn't sound like what I am familiar with as the Dobzhansky-Muller Model, unless it is so poorly written that this is what it is describing. Dopeytaylor (talk) 20:39, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Irreducible complexity

Apparently he contributed something in that direction. --197.229.124.241 (talk) 22:26, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

American?

Shouldn't his nationality be American? If someone asked me what my nationality was I wouldn't say I was a United States, I would say I was an American. Just like someone who is a citizen of the country Austria is an Austrian, etc. DlronW (talk) 15:13, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Muller & Pauling: their Noble lies about low dose rates

Here's Calabrese in 2016, detailing Muller's scientific misconduct. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013935116301219

As for Muller's partner in crime, the equally medical-quakery-spouting Linus Pauling.

Here's some of his well documented scientific misconduct, detailed by Malhar N. Kumar.https://rd.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10805-008-9068-6?no-access=true

We don't present the opinion of one person to be the general view on a subject, and Pauling is also the not the subject of the article. Please give only consensus opinion of the scientific community rather than the opinion of one. Hzh (talk) 09:46, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 09:47, 2 August 2017 edit Hzh (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers 141,783 edits →Muller & Pauling: their Noble lies about low dose rates ← Previous edit		Revision as of 10:00, 2 August 2017 edit undo Hzh (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers 141,783 edits →Muller & Pauling: their Noble lies about low dose rates Next edit →
Line 31:		Line 31:

	Here's some of his well documented scientific misconduct, detailed by Malhar N. Kumar.https://rd.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10805-008-9068-6?no-access=true		Here's some of his well documented scientific misconduct, detailed by Malhar N. Kumar.https://rd.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10805-008-9068-6?no-access=true
	:We ~~have~~ no ~~interest~~ in ~~what~~ one person ~~says~~, and Pauling is the not the subject of the article. Please give only consensus opinion of the scientific community rather than the opinion of one. [[User:Hzh\|Hzh]] ([[User talk:Hzh\|talk]]) 09:46, 2 August 2017 (UTC)		:We don't present the opinion of one person to be the general view on a subject, and Pauling is also the not the subject of the article. Please give only consensus opinion of the scientific community rather than the opinion of one. [[User:Hzh\|Hzh]] ([[User talk:Hzh\|talk]]) 09:46, 2 August 2017 (UTC)