Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GameRevolution
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- GameRevolution (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Half of this article is sourced from Game Revolution itself. Not seeing enough secondary sources on the site which makes this website appear to not be notable to get its own article. GamerPro64 05:01, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism, Video games, and Websites. GamerPro64 05:01, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Reviewed the sources, none of them clearly give reliable/significant/independent/secondary coverage. The only possible ones are the two sources (DMW & Reuters) discussing the purchase, but the coverage is not very significant, and the Reuters one is explicitly a press release, while the DMW one is very likely one anyways. Google books/regular search reveal no sources and there is no obvious reason why any should exist, given it's a minor gaming news source that features in awards sometimes. Mrfoogles (talk) 07:10, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 07:11, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per SIGCOV, and lack of notability. Encoded Talk 💬 14:53, 1 December 2024 (UTC)