Jump to content

Talk:Hermann Joseph Muller

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Hzh (talk | contribs) at 10:00, 2 August 2017 (Muller & Pauling: their Noble lies about low dose rates). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Untitled

He was also an eugenicist.See this site: [Eugenics manifesto].Agre22 (talk) 21:02, 9 May 2009 (UTC)agre22[reply]

Dobzhansky-Muller

I think that one of the important contributions Muller made to biology was the Dobzhansky-Muller Model of hybrid incompatibility. I'm not even sure there is a wikipedia entry on this. There is one on Bateson-Dobzhansky-Muller Model, but this doesn't sound like what I am familiar with as the Dobzhansky-Muller Model, unless it is so poorly written that this is what it is describing. Dopeytaylor (talk) 20:39, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Irreducible complexity

Apparently he contributed something in that direction. --197.229.124.241 (talk) 22:26, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

American?

Shouldn't his nationality be American? If someone asked me what my nationality was I wouldn't say I was a United States, I would say I was an American. Just like someone who is a citizen of the country Austria is an Austrian, etc. DlronW (talk) 15:13, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Muller & Pauling: their Noble lies about low dose rates

Here's Calabrese in 2016, detailing Muller's scientific misconduct. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013935116301219

As for Muller's partner in crime, the equally medical-quakery-spouting Linus Pauling.

Here's some of his well documented scientific misconduct, detailed by Malhar N. Kumar.https://rd.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10805-008-9068-6?no-access=true

We don't present the opinion of one person to be the general view on a subject, and Pauling is also the not the subject of the article. Please give only consensus opinion of the scientific community rather than the opinion of one. Hzh (talk) 09:46, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]