Jump to content

Wikipedia:Usernames for administrator attention: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Reporting EagleMusicIndia. (TW)
Reporting ESPN Cricinfo. (Twinkle)
Line 34: Line 34:


*{{user-uaa|1=EagleMusicIndia}} – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Eagle Home Entertainment is one of the most oldest and biggest home entertainment companies of the India. Proud to launch our new division called Eagle Music.. [[User:Flat Out|Flat Out]] ([[User talk:Flat Out|talk]]) 07:15, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
*{{user-uaa|1=EagleMusicIndia}} – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Eagle Home Entertainment is one of the most oldest and biggest home entertainment companies of the India. Proud to launch our new division called Eagle Music.. [[User:Flat Out|Flat Out]] ([[User talk:Flat Out|talk]]) 07:15, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

*{{user-uaa|1=ESPN Cricinfo}} &ndash; Violation of the username policy as a promotional username that implies shared use. [[User:Winged Blades of Godric|<span style="color: red">&#x222F;</span><span style="font-family:Verdana"><b style="color:#070">WBG</b></span>]][[User talk:Winged Blades of Godric|<sup><span style="color:#00F">converse</span></sup>]] 07:20, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:20, 1 August 2018

    Usernames for administrator attention

    This page is intended for reports of usernames that are blatant and serious violations of the username policy requiring an immediate block. Reports will be assessed in accordance with the username policy, the UAA instructions, and the following bullet points. Please ensure you are familiar with the assessment criteria before making a report.

    1. Except in the instance of an egregious name violation, please do not report accounts with no edits or those who have not edited in the preceding 2 weeks.
    2. Real names are permitted, except when the editor implies they are someone other than themselves, such as impersonating a notable living person.
    3. Promotional names require evidence to be blocked. Do not report a username merely because it "appears" promotional.
    4. For libellous usernames or usernames that contain another editor's nonpublic personal information, please contact an oversighter and do not report it here.
    5. Discuss less-serious violations with the user on their talk page so that they can rename or abandon their account in good faith. Templates such as {{Uw-username}} or {{Uw-coi-username}} may be used. If, after discussion with a user, the problem still seems unresolved, a username request for comment may be in order.
    6. Do not leave a username warning on a user's talk page and also immediately report them here. Do one or the other, and not both simultaneously.
    7. Patrollers are asked to remove reports that have been declined, are bot-reported false positives or are otherwise non-blatant or stale reports.
    You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.
    This page was last updated at 20:48 on 11 January 2025 (UTC). Purge the cache of this page if it is out of date.
    Note: Patrollers are kindly asked to monitor usernames listed at Filter 102, Filter 148, Filter 149, Filter 354 (tags), Filter 579, WP:UAA/HP, and CAT:UAA.


    User-reported

    • (Non-administrator comment) Not necessarily. Remember that "alumni" may also be used to refer to a single person, EDIT though not when used in its proper form. It's a common mistake for people to misuse "alumni" when they should be using "alumnus" or "alumnae". StrikerforceTalk 16:36, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    "Alumni" is plural for an "alumnus" (masculine), an "alumna" (feminine), or an "alumnum" (gender-neutral), but I also agree with Strikerforce that this is very commonly confused and used incorrectly. Hell, I had to go look it up and verify if "alumni" was the plural or the singular form of the word... so I'd be a hypocrite if I said that this wasn't a common mistake... :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 17:05, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    (Non-administrator comment) Technically, it could imply shared use if the account represents an alumni association, but then and again given the common confusion I think it's unlikely. Might this be moved to the holding pen? Aspening (talk) 17:10, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    (Non-administrator comment)} That's reasonable, I'd think. StrikerforceTalk 20:04, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]