Jump to content

Richard Dawkins: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
I have removed some of his critics from just one big block on the page to set out properly while also showing how he has responded. I have also set out certain contrevercies as these are not just political beliefs (they are in a seperate article) but personal inccidents where there has been controversy generated. i have tried, where possible, to include his defence and responce to said controversy.
Line 127: Line 127:


Dawkins sees education and [[consciousness raising|consciousness-raising]] as the primary tools in opposing what he considers to be religious dogma and indoctrination.<ref name="belief interview"/><ref name="education">{{cite news |last=Smith |first=Alexandra |url=http://education.guardian.co.uk/schools/story/0,,1958138,00.html |title=Dawkins campaigns to keep God out of classroom |accessdate=15 January 2007 |date=27 November 2006 |newspaper=The Guardian |location=London}}</ref><ref name="bright">{{cite news |url=http://books.guardian.co.uk/review/story/0,12084,981412,00.html |title=The future looks bright |accessdate=13 March 2008 |last=Dawkins |first=Richard |date=21 June 2003 |newspaper=The Guardian |location=London}}</ref> These tools include the fight against certain stereotypes, and he has adopted the term ''[[brights movement|bright]]'' as a way of associating positive public connotations with those who possess a [[naturalism (philosophy)|naturalistic]] worldview.<ref name="bright"/> He has given support to the idea of a free-thinking school,<ref name="Powell">{{cite news |last=Powell |first=Michael |title=A Knack for Bashing Orthodoxy |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/20/science/20dawkins.html |date=19 September 2011 |work=The New York Times |page=4 |accessdate=20 September 2011}}</ref> which would not "indoctrinate children" but would instead teach children to ask for evidence and be skeptical, critical, and open-minded. Such a school, says Dawkins, should "teach comparative religion, and teach it properly without any bias towards particular religions, and including historically important but dead religions, such as those of ancient Greece and the Norse gods, if only because these, like the Abrahamic scriptures, are important for understanding English literature and European history.<ref name="telegraph1">{{cite news |last=Beckford |first=Martin |url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/religion/7849563/Richard-Dawkins-interested-in-setting-up-atheist-free-school.html |title=Richard Dawkins interested in setting up 'atheist free school' |newspaper=Telegraph |date=24 June 2010 |accessdate=29 July 2010 |location=London}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/education/education-news/gove-welcomes-atheist-schools-2037990.html |title=Gove welcomes atheist schools – Education News, Education |newspaper=The Independent |date=29 July 2010 |accessdate=29 July 2010 |location=London |first=Richard |last=Garner}}</ref> Inspired by the consciousness-raising successes of [[Feminism|feminists]] in arousing widespread embarrassment at the routine use of "he" instead of "she", Dawkins similarly suggests that phrases such as "Catholic child" and "Muslim child" should be considered as socially absurd as, for instance, "Marxist child", as he believes that children should not be classified based on the ideological or religious beliefs of their parents.<ref name="bright" />
Dawkins sees education and [[consciousness raising|consciousness-raising]] as the primary tools in opposing what he considers to be religious dogma and indoctrination.<ref name="belief interview"/><ref name="education">{{cite news |last=Smith |first=Alexandra |url=http://education.guardian.co.uk/schools/story/0,,1958138,00.html |title=Dawkins campaigns to keep God out of classroom |accessdate=15 January 2007 |date=27 November 2006 |newspaper=The Guardian |location=London}}</ref><ref name="bright">{{cite news |url=http://books.guardian.co.uk/review/story/0,12084,981412,00.html |title=The future looks bright |accessdate=13 March 2008 |last=Dawkins |first=Richard |date=21 June 2003 |newspaper=The Guardian |location=London}}</ref> These tools include the fight against certain stereotypes, and he has adopted the term ''[[brights movement|bright]]'' as a way of associating positive public connotations with those who possess a [[naturalism (philosophy)|naturalistic]] worldview.<ref name="bright"/> He has given support to the idea of a free-thinking school,<ref name="Powell">{{cite news |last=Powell |first=Michael |title=A Knack for Bashing Orthodoxy |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/20/science/20dawkins.html |date=19 September 2011 |work=The New York Times |page=4 |accessdate=20 September 2011}}</ref> which would not "indoctrinate children" but would instead teach children to ask for evidence and be skeptical, critical, and open-minded. Such a school, says Dawkins, should "teach comparative religion, and teach it properly without any bias towards particular religions, and including historically important but dead religions, such as those of ancient Greece and the Norse gods, if only because these, like the Abrahamic scriptures, are important for understanding English literature and European history.<ref name="telegraph1">{{cite news |last=Beckford |first=Martin |url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/religion/7849563/Richard-Dawkins-interested-in-setting-up-atheist-free-school.html |title=Richard Dawkins interested in setting up 'atheist free school' |newspaper=Telegraph |date=24 June 2010 |accessdate=29 July 2010 |location=London}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/education/education-news/gove-welcomes-atheist-schools-2037990.html |title=Gove welcomes atheist schools – Education News, Education |newspaper=The Independent |date=29 July 2010 |accessdate=29 July 2010 |location=London |first=Richard |last=Garner}}</ref> Inspired by the consciousness-raising successes of [[Feminism|feminists]] in arousing widespread embarrassment at the routine use of "he" instead of "she", Dawkins similarly suggests that phrases such as "Catholic child" and "Muslim child" should be considered as socially absurd as, for instance, "Marxist child", as he believes that children should not be classified based on the ideological or religious beliefs of their parents.<ref name="bright" />

While some critics, such as writer [[Christopher Hitchens]], psychologist [[Steven Pinker]] and [[Nobel laureate]]s Sir [[Harold Kroto]], [[James D. Watson]], and [[Steven Weinberg]] have defended Dawkins's stance on religion and praised his work,<ref>{{cite web |url=http://richarddawkins.net/godDelusionReviews |title=The God Delusion&nbsp;– Reviews |accessdate=8 April 2008 |publisher=Richard Dawkins Foundation |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20080702000504/http://richarddawkins.net/godDelusionReviews |archivedate=2 July 2008 |url-status=dead}}</ref> others, including [[Nobel Prize in Physics|Nobel Prize]]-winning [[theoretical physicist]] [[Peter Higgs]], [[astrophysicist]] [[Martin Rees, Baron Rees of Ludlow|Martin Rees]], philosopher of science [[Michael Ruse]], literary critic [[Terry Eagleton]], philosopher [[Roger Scruton]], academic and social critic [[Camille Paglia]], atheist philosopher Daniel Came and theologian [[Alister McGrath]],{{refn|<ref>{{cite book |last=McGrath |first=Alister |authorlink=Alister McGrath |title=Dawkins' God: Genes, Memes, and the Meaning of Life |year=2004 |publisher=Blackwell Publishing |location=Oxford, England |isbn=978-1-4051-2538-3 |page=[https://archive.org/details/dawkinsgodgenesm0000mcgr/page/81 81] |url=https://archive.org/details/dawkinsgodgenesm0000mcgr/page/81 }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/belief/2009/nov/02/atheism-dawkins-ruse |location=London |work=The Guardian |first=Michael |last=Ruse |authorlink=Michael Ruse |title=Dawkins et al bring us into disrepute |date=2 November 2009 |accessdate=23 April 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/belief/2012/oct/02/richard-dawkins-humanists-religion-atheists |location=London |work=The Guardian |first=Michael |last=Ruse |authorlink=Michael Ruse |title=Why Richard Dawkins' humanists remind me of a religion |date=2 October 2012}}</ref><ref name="salon.com">{{cite web |url=https://www.salon.com/2015/07/29/camille_paglia_takes_on_jon_stewart_trump_sanders_liberals_think_of_themselves_as_very_open_minded_but_that%e2%80%99s_simply_not_true/ |title=Camille Paglia takes on Jon Stewart, Trump, Sanders: "Liberals think of themselves as very open-minded, but that's simply not true!" |date=29 July 2015 |website=Salon}}</ref><ref name="spectator.co.uk">{{cite web |url=https://www.spectator.co.uk/2006/01/dawkins-is-wrong-about-god/ |title=Dawkins is wrong about God |date=14 January 2006 |website=The Spectator}}</ref><ref name="auto">{{cite web |url=https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/belief/2011/oct/22/richard-dawkins-refusal-debate-william-lane-craig |title=Richard Dawkins's refusal to debate is cynical and anti-intellectualist |first=Daniel |last=Came |date=22 October 2011 |via=www.theguardian.com}}</ref>}} have criticised Dawkins on various grounds, including the assertion that his work simply serves as an atheist counterpart to religious fundamentalism rather than a productive critique of it, and that he has fundamentally misapprehended the foundations of the [[theological]] positions he claims to refute. Rees and Higgs, in particular, have both rejected Dawkins's confrontational stance toward religion as narrow and "embarrassing", with Higgs going as far as to equate Dawkins with the religious fundamentalists he criticises.<ref>{{cite magazine |url=http://www.lrb.co.uk/v28/n20/terry-eagleton/lunging-flailing-mispunching |title=Lunging, Flailing, Mispunching |first=Terry |last=Eagleton· |date=19 October 2006 |magazine=[[London Review of Books]] |accessdate=16 May 2014 |volume=28 |issue=20 |pages=32–34}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://richarddawkins.net/articleComments,1647,Do-you-have-to-read-up-on-leprechology-before-disbelieving-in-them,Richard-Dawkins-The-Independent,page27 |title=Do you have to read up on leprechology before disbelieving in them? |accessdate=14 November 2007 |last=Dawkins |first=Richard |date=17 September 2007 |publisher=Richard Dawkins Foundation |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20071214014838/http://richarddawkins.net/articleComments,1647,Do-you-have-to-read-up-on-leprechology-before-disbelieving-in-them,Richard-Dawkins-The-Independent,page27 |archivedate=14 December 2007}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |url=http://books.guardian.co.uk/hay2007/story/0,,2089947,00.html |title=Scientists divided over alliance with religion |accessdate=17 March 2008 |last=Jha |first=Alok |date=29 May 2007 |newspaper=The Guardian |location=London}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last=Jha |first=Alok |url=https://www.theguardian.com/science/2012/dec/26/peter-higgs-richard-dawkins-fundamentalism |title=Peter Higgs criticises Richard Dawkins over anti-religious 'fundamentalism' |date=26 December 2012 |accessdate=20 January 2016 |work=[[The Guardian]]}}</ref> Atheist philosopher [[John Gray (philosopher)|John Gray]] has denounced Dawkins as an "anti-religious missionary", whose assertions are "in no sense novel or original," suggesting that "transfixed in wonderment at the workings of his own mind, Dawkins misses much that is of importance in human beings." Gray has also criticised Dawkins's perceived allegiance to Darwin, stating that if "science, for Darwin, was a method of inquiry that enabled him to edge tentatively and humbly toward the truth, for Dawkins, science is an unquestioned view of the world."<ref>{{cite news |url=https://newrepublic.com/article/119596/appetite-wonder-review-closed-mind-richard-dawkins |title=The Closed Mind of Richard Dawkins |date=2 October 2014 |accessdate=20 January 2016 |first=John |last=Gray |work=New Republic}}</ref> In response to his critics, Dawkins maintains that theologians are no better than scientists in addressing deep [[cosmological]] questions and that he is not a fundamentalist, as he is willing to change his mind in the face of new evidence.{{sfn|Dawkins|2006}}<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.secularhumanism.org/library/fi/dawkins_18_2.html |title=When Religion Steps on Science's Turf |accessdate=3 April 2008 |last=Dawkins |first=Richard |year=2006 |work=Free Inquiry |url-status=dead |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20080419125549/http://www.secularhumanism.org/library/fi/dawkins_18_2.html |archivedate=19 April 2008}}</ref><ref name=rdf-fundamentalist>{{cite web |last=Dawkins |first=Richard |title=How dare you call me a fundamentalist |url=http://old.richarddawkins.net/articles/1071-how-dare-you-call-me-a-fundamentalist |publisher=Richard Dawkins Foundation |accessdate=28 December 2012 |url-status=dead |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20121231022508/http://old.richarddawkins.net/articles/1071-how-dare-you-call-me-a-fundamentalist |archivedate=31 December 2012}}</ref> [[Roger Scruton]] has said that Dawkins [[cherry picking|cherry-picks]] his data, and ignores the benefits of religion.<ref name="spectator.co.uk"/>


==== Criticism of creationism ====
==== Criticism of creationism ====
Line 153: Line 151:
As a supporter of the [[Great Ape Project]]—a movement to extend certain moral and legal [[rights]] to all [[Hominidae|great apes]]—Dawkins contributed the article 'Gaps in the Mind' to the ''Great Ape Project'' book edited by [[Paola Cavalieri]] and [[Peter Singer]]. In this essay, he criticises contemporary society's moral attitudes as being based on a "discontinuous, [[speciesism|speciesist]] imperative".<ref>{{cite book | editor-first1= Paola | editor-last1= Cavalieri | editor-first2= Peter | editor-last2= Singer |title=The Great Ape Project |year=1993 |publisher=Fourth Estate |location=United Kingdom |isbn=978-0-312-11818-1 |url=https://archive.org/details/greatapeprojecte00cava}}</ref>
As a supporter of the [[Great Ape Project]]—a movement to extend certain moral and legal [[rights]] to all [[Hominidae|great apes]]—Dawkins contributed the article 'Gaps in the Mind' to the ''Great Ape Project'' book edited by [[Paola Cavalieri]] and [[Peter Singer]]. In this essay, he criticises contemporary society's moral attitudes as being based on a "discontinuous, [[speciesism|speciesist]] imperative".<ref>{{cite book | editor-first1= Paola | editor-last1= Cavalieri | editor-first2= Peter | editor-last2= Singer |title=The Great Ape Project |year=1993 |publisher=Fourth Estate |location=United Kingdom |isbn=978-0-312-11818-1 |url=https://archive.org/details/greatapeprojecte00cava}}</ref>


Dawkins also regularly comments in newspapers and [[blog]]s on contemporary political questions and is a frequent contributor to the online science and culture digest ''[[3 Quarks Daily]]''.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.3quarksdaily.com/3quarksdaily/2010/06/the-winners-of-the-3-quarks-daily-2010-prize-in-science.html |title=3 Quarks Daily 2010 Prize in Science: Richard Dawkins has picked the three winners |date=1 June 2010 |accessdate=20 January 2016}}</ref> His opinions include opposition to the [[2003 invasion of Iraq]],<ref>{{cite news |first=Richard |last=Dawkins |title=Bin Laden's victory |url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2003/mar/22/iraq.usa |newspaper=The Guardian |location=London |date=22 March 2003 |accessdate=15 March 2008}}</ref> the [[Trident nuclear programme|British nuclear deterrent]], the actions of then-US President [[George W. Bush]],<ref>{{cite news |first=Richard |last=Dawkins |title=While we have your attention, Mr President... |url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2003/nov/18/usa.politics1 |work=The Guardian |location=London |date=18 November 2003 |accessdate=16 March 2008}}</ref> and the ethics of [[designer babies]].<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.heraldscotland.com/from-the-afterword-1.836155 |title=From the Afterword |first=Richard |last=Dawkins |work=Herald Scotland |date=19 November 2006 |accessdate=9 June 2014}}</ref> Several such articles were included in ''[[A Devil's Chaplain]]'', an anthology of writings about science, religion, and politics. He is also a supporter of [[Republic (political organisation)|Republic]]'s campaign to replace the [[British monarchy]] with a democratically elected [[President (government title)|president]].<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.republic.org.uk/Who%20we%20are/Our%20Supporters%20Include/index.php |title=Our supporters |publisher=Republic |date=24 April 2010 |accessdate=29 April 2010 |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20120326212133/http://www.republic.org.uk/Who%20we%20are/Our%20Supporters%20Include/index.php |archivedate=26 March 2012 |url-status=dead}}</ref> Dawkins has described himself as a [[Labour Party (UK)|Labour]] voter in the 1970s<ref>{{cite book |last=Dawkins |first=Richard |title=The Selfish Gene ''(1st extra chapter)'' |edition=2nd |year=1989 |publisher=Oxford University Press |location=United Kingdom |isbn=978-0-19-286092-7 |chapter=Endnotes. Chapter 1. Why are people? |chapter-url=https://archive.org/details/selfishgene00dawkrich }}</ref> and voter for the [[Liberal Democrats (UK)|Liberal Democrats]] since the party's creation. In 2009, he spoke at the party's conference in opposition to blasphemy laws, alternative medicine, and faith schools. In the [[2010 United Kingdom general election|UK general election of 2010]], Dawkins officially endorsed the Liberal Democrats, in support of their campaign for electoral reform and for their "refusal to pander to 'faith{{' "}}.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://libdems.org.uk/latest_news_detail.aspx |title=Show your support – vote for the Liberal Democrats on May&nbsp;6th |date=3 May 2010 |publisher=Libdems.org.uk |accessdate=29 July 2010 |url-status=dead |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20100414004332/http://www.libdems.org.uk/latest_news_detail.aspx |archivedate=14 April 2010}}</ref> In the run up to the [[2017 United Kingdom general election|2017 general election]], Dawkins once again endorsed the Liberal Democrats and urged voters to join the party.
Dawkins also regularly comments in newspapers and [[blog]]s on contemporary political questions and is a frequent contributor to the online science and culture digest ''[[3 Quarks Daily]]''.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.3quarksdaily.com/3quarksdaily/2010/06/the-winners-of-the-3-quarks-daily-2010-prize-in-science.html |title=3 Quarks Daily 2010 Prize in Science: Richard Dawkins has picked the three winners |date=1 June 2010 |accessdate=20 January 2016}}</ref> His opinions include opposition to the [[2003 invasion of Iraq]],<ref>{{cite news |first=Richard |last=Dawkins |title=Bin Laden's victory |url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2003/mar/22/iraq.usa |newspaper=The Guardian |location=London |date=22 March 2003 |accessdate=15 March 2008}}</ref> the [[Trident nuclear programme|British nuclear deterrent]], the actions of then-US President [[George W. Bush]],<ref>{{cite news |first=Richard |last=Dawkins |title=While we have your attention, Mr President... |url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2003/nov/18/usa.politics1 |work=The Guardian |location=London |date=18 November 2003 |accessdate=16 March 2008}}</ref> and the ethics of [[designer babies]].<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.heraldscotland.com/from-the-afterword-1.836155 |title=From the Afterword |first=Richard |last=Dawkins |work=Herald Scotland |date=19 November 2006 |accessdate=9 June 2014}}</ref> Several such articles were included in ''[[A Devil's Chaplain]]'', an anthology of writings about science, religion, and politics. He is also a supporter of [[Republic (political organisation)|Republic]]'s campaign to replace the [[British monarchy]] with a democratically elected [[President (government title)|president]].<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.republic.org.uk/Who%20we%20are/Our%20Supporters%20Include/index.php |title=Our supporters |publisher=Republic |date=24 April 2010 |accessdate=29 April 2010 |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20120326212133/http://www.republic.org.uk/Who%20we%20are/Our%20Supporters%20Include/index.php |archivedate=26 March 2012 |url-status=dead}}</ref>
Dawkins has described himself as a [[Labour Party (UK)|Labour]] voter in the 1970s<ref>{{cite book |last=Dawkins |first=Richard |title=The Selfish Gene ''(1st extra chapter)'' |edition=2nd |year=1989 |publisher=Oxford University Press |location=United Kingdom |isbn=978-0-19-286092-7 |chapter=Endnotes. Chapter 1. Why are people? |chapter-url=https://archive.org/details/selfishgene00dawkrich }}</ref> and In 2009 Dawkins participated in a ''[[New Statesman]]'' project called "20 ways to save Labour" where he among others gave suggestions about how to make the Labour Party better. Dawkins's contribution stated:<blockquote>Stop toadying to [[Islam|Muslims]] and other "faith communities" as part of a general abolition of all religious privilege. Withdraw government support from schools that abuse children by teaching them they belong to a particular religion (as opposed to teaching them about religions and letting them make up their own minds when they are old enough). Abolish the automatic right of religious organizations to charitable status, and the automatic right of bishops to sit in the [[House of Lords]].<ref>{{Citation|title=Political views of Richard Dawkins|date=2020-05-08|url=https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Political_views_of_Richard_Dawkins&oldid=955632483|work=Wikipedia|language=en|access-date=2020-05-27}}</ref></blockquote>He has been a voter for the [[Liberal Democrats (UK)|Liberal Democrats]] since the party's creation. In 2009, he spoke at the party's conference in opposition to blasphemy laws, alternative medicine, and faith schools. In the [[2010 United Kingdom general election|UK general election of 2010]], Dawkins officially endorsed the Liberal Democrats, in support of their campaign for electoral reform and for their "refusal to pander to 'faith{{' "}}.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://libdems.org.uk/latest_news_detail.aspx |title=Show your support – vote for the Liberal Democrats on May&nbsp;6th |date=3 May 2010 |publisher=Libdems.org.uk |accessdate=29 July 2010 |url-status=dead |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20100414004332/http://www.libdems.org.uk/latest_news_detail.aspx |archivedate=14 April 2010}}</ref> In the run up to the [[2017 United Kingdom general election|2017 general election]], Dawkins once again endorsed the Liberal Democrats and urged voters to join the party.


In 1998, Dawkins expressed his appreciation for two books connected with the [[Sokal affair]], ''[[Higher Superstition: The Academic Left and Its Quarrels with Science]]'' by [[Paul R. Gross]] and [[Norman Levitt]] and ''[[Fashionable Nonsense|Intellectual Impostures]]'' by [[Alan Sokal|Sokal]] and [[Jean Bricmont]]. These books are famous for their criticism of [[postmodernism]] in US universities (namely in the departments of literary studies, anthropology, and other cultural studies).<ref name="postmodernism">{{cite journal |last=Dawkins |first=Richard |title=Postmodernism Disrobed |date=9 July 1998 |journal=[[Nature (journal)|Nature]] |volume=394 |issue=6689 |pages=141–43 |doi=10.1038/28089 |bibcode=1998Natur.394..141D}} For article with math symbols see [http://www.physics.nyu.edu/sokal/dawkins.html this link].</ref>
In 1998, Dawkins expressed his appreciation for two books connected with the [[Sokal affair]], ''[[Higher Superstition: The Academic Left and Its Quarrels with Science]]'' by [[Paul R. Gross]] and [[Norman Levitt]] and ''[[Fashionable Nonsense|Intellectual Impostures]]'' by [[Alan Sokal|Sokal]] and [[Jean Bricmont]]. These books are famous for their criticism of [[postmodernism]] in US universities (namely in the departments of literary studies, anthropology, and other cultural studies).<ref name="postmodernism">{{cite journal |last=Dawkins |first=Richard |title=Postmodernism Disrobed |date=9 July 1998 |journal=[[Nature (journal)|Nature]] |volume=394 |issue=6689 |pages=141–43 |doi=10.1038/28089 |bibcode=1998Natur.394..141D}} For article with math symbols see [http://www.physics.nyu.edu/sokal/dawkins.html this link].</ref>
Line 159: Line 159:
Dawkins has voiced his support for the [[Campaign for the Establishment of a United Nations Parliamentary Assembly]], an organisation that campaigns for democratic reform in the United Nations, and the creation of a more accountable international political system.<ref>{{Cite news |url=http://en.unpacampaign.org/supporters/overview/page/2/?mapcountry=allpro&mapgroup=pro |title=Overview |date= |work=Campaign for a UN Parliamentary Assembly|access-date=9 October 2017 |language=en-US}}</ref>
Dawkins has voiced his support for the [[Campaign for the Establishment of a United Nations Parliamentary Assembly]], an organisation that campaigns for democratic reform in the United Nations, and the creation of a more accountable international political system.<ref>{{Cite news |url=http://en.unpacampaign.org/supporters/overview/page/2/?mapcountry=allpro&mapgroup=pro |title=Overview |date= |work=Campaign for a UN Parliamentary Assembly|access-date=9 October 2017 |language=en-US}}</ref>


Dawkins identifies as a feminist.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://twitter.com/richarddawkins/status/280427716010983424 |title=Richard Dawkins |date=16 December 2012 |accessdate=3 May 2015 |website=Twitter |last=Dawkins |first=Richard}}</ref> Dawkins has said that feminism is "enormously important" and "a political movement that deserves to be supported".<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.salon.com/2014/12/08/richard_dawkins_is_there_a_mens_rights_movement/ |title=Richard Dawkins: "Is There a Men's Rights Movement?" |work=[[Salon (website)|Salon]] |last=Kutner |first=Jenny |date=8 December 2014 |accessdate=1 February 2015}}</ref>
Dawkins identifies as a feminist.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://twitter.com/richarddawkins/status/280427716010983424 |title=Richard Dawkins |date=16 December 2012 |accessdate=3 May 2015 |website=Twitter |last=Dawkins |first=Richard}}</ref> Dawkins has said that feminism is "enormously important" and "a political movement that deserves to be supported".<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.salon.com/2014/12/08/richard_dawkins_is_there_a_mens_rights_movement/ |title=Richard Dawkins: "Is There a Men's Rights Movement?" |work=[[Salon (website)|Salon]] |last=Kutner |first=Jenny |date=8 December 2014 |accessdate=1 February 2015}}</ref>


=== Other fields ===
=== Other fields ===
Line 170: Line 170:
In 2014 he joined the global awareness movement [[Asteroid Day]] as a "100x Signatory".<ref name="Telegrapharticle">{{cite news |url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/11272393/Asteroids-could-wipe-out-humanity-warn-Richard-Dawkins-and-Brian-Cox.html |title=Asteroids could wipe out humanity, warn Richard Dawkins and Brian Cox |newspaper=The Telegraph |first=Sarah |last=Knapton |date=4 December 2014 |accessdate=4 December 2014}}</ref>
In 2014 he joined the global awareness movement [[Asteroid Day]] as a "100x Signatory".<ref name="Telegrapharticle">{{cite news |url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/11272393/Asteroids-could-wipe-out-humanity-warn-Richard-Dawkins-and-Brian-Cox.html |title=Asteroids could wipe out humanity, warn Richard Dawkins and Brian Cox |newspaper=The Telegraph |first=Sarah |last=Knapton |date=4 December 2014 |accessdate=4 December 2014}}</ref>


Dawkins worked alongside Welsh Musician [[Jayce Lewis]] contributing a recorded spoken word for the track "Exhale" from his 1998 book ''[[Unweaving the Rainbow]]'' to the Welshman's third full-length album ''Million''.
Dawkins worked alongside Welsh Musician [[Jayce Lewis]] contributing a recorded spoken word for the track "Exhale" from his 1998 book ''[[Unweaving the Rainbow]]'' to the Welshman's third full-length album ''Million.''


<br />
== Awards and recognition ==


== Controversy and Criticism ==
While is contribution to Science and rationalism cannot be doubted, Dawkins has attracted much criticism from fellow academics and philosophers as well as attracted much controversy in relation to some of his comments.

=== Criticism by scientists ===
A study of British Scientists by [[Rice University]] brought about heavy criticism of Dawkins. In an in-depth study of 137 British scientists 48 referenced Dawkins despite no questions being asked about him, 80% said they thought that Dawkins misrepresents science and scientists in his books and public speeches. Another common criticism was that Dawkins was too strong in his criticism of religion, one non religious biology professor described him as a “fundamental atheist' another said he was on a "crusade". However it should be noted 20% did mention him with positive views, owing to him challenging creationists and those who adhere to intelligent design. Paul Fidalgo, of the [[Center for Inquiry|centre for inquiry]], also challenged the saying that Dawkins has inspired millions and due to the size pool of the study this was understandable. <ref>{{Cite web|title=British scientists really, really dislike Richard Dawkins, new study discover|url=http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/richard-dawkins-atheism-criticism-atheist-study-rice-university-science-scientists-a7389396.html|date=2016-10-31|website=The Independent|language=en|access-date=2020-05-27}}</ref>

In 2014 biologist and Harvard University professor, E.O Wilson, criticised Dawkins on [[Newsnight]] calling him a Journalist and not a scientist.<ref>{{Cite web|title=|url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/why-richard-dawkins-is-no-scientist-the-survival-of-the-least-selfish-and-what-ants-can-tell-us-9849956.html|last=|first=|date=|website=www.google.com|url-status=live|archive-url=|archive-date=|access-date=2020-05-28}}</ref>His comments are below: <blockquote>“There is no dispute between me and Richard Dawkins and there never has been, because he’s a journalist, and journalists are people that report what the scientists have found and the arguments I’ve had have actually been with scientists doing research,” </blockquote>He also went on to answer questions about his opinions on Dawkins' book the selfish gene, stating: <blockquote>“I have abandoned it and I think most serious scientists working on it have abandoned it. Some defenders may be out there, but they have been relatively or almost totally silenced since our major paper came out.”</blockquote>The paper he referred to was a 2010 study published in [[Nature (journal)|Nature]] entitled [https://www.nature.com/articles/nature09205 The evolution of eusociality]. Dawkins attributed Wilson's comments to a disagreement over [[kin selection]], later tweeting “I greatly admire EO Wilson & his huge contributions to entomology, ecology, biogeography, conservation, etc. He’s just wrong on kin selection.” He later elaborated referencing a critical [[Prospect (magazine)|Prospect Magazine]] review of Wilson’s book [[The Social Conquest of Earth]]. <ref>{{Cite news|last=Johnston|first=Chris|date=2014-11-07|title=Biological warfare flares up again between EO Wilson and Richard Dawkins|language=en-GB|work=The Guardian|url=https://www.theguardian.com/science/2014/nov/07/richard-dawkins-labelled-journalist-by-eo-wilson|access-date=2020-05-27|issn=0261-3077}}</ref>

[[Nobel Prize in Physics|Nobel Prize]]-winning [[theoretical physicist]] [[Peter Higgs]] and [[Astrophysicists|astrophysicist]] [[Martin Rees]] has equated Dawkins with the religious fundamentalists he criticises saying he has adopted "[[fundamentalist]]" view of non-atheists.

Other scientists have accused him of promoting [[Scientism]], such as [[Francis Collins|Dr Francis Collins]] the head of the [[National Institutes of Health|National Institute of Health]]<ref>{{Cite web|title=New Templeton Prize winner criticises the 'scientism' of Dawkins|url=https://catholicherald.co.uk/new-templeton-prize-winner-criticises-dawkins-scientism/|last=Reporter|first=Staff|date=2020-05-21|website=Catholic Herald|language=en-GB|access-date=2020-05-27}}</ref>

=== Criticism by theologians and philosophers ===
Atheist philosophers such as [[Massimo Pigliucci]], [[Michael Ruse]] and [[John Gray (philosopher)|John Gray]] have criticised Dawkins. Their comments are below.

Ruse has that Dawkins would fail introductory courses on the study of philosophy or religion. He has also said that Dawkins and New Atheism does science a "grave disservice" and does a "disservice to scholarship" at more general level. Ruse then stated that The God Delusion made him 'ashamed to be an atheist'.<ref>{{Cite book|last=Doherty|first=Tim|title=The Routledge Handbook of Contemporary Philosophy of Religion|publisher=Routledge|year=2009|isbn=9781844658312|location=New York|pages=52–53}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=Ruse on belief net|url=http://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/scienceandthesacred/2009/08/why-i-think-the-new-atheists-are-a-bloody-disaster.html|last=|first=|date=|website=|url-status=live|archive-url=|archive-date=|access-date=}}</ref> Pigliucci has accused Dawkins and the leaders of the new atheism movement as adhering to scientism also saying, "I would actually go so far as to charge many of the leaders of the New Atheism movement (and, by implication, a good number of their followers) with anti-intellectualism, one mark of which is a lack of respect for the proper significance, value, and methods of another field of intellectual endeavor."<ref>{{Cite book|last=Pigliucci|first=Massimo|title=New Atheism and the Scientistic Turn in the Atheism Movement|publisher=|year=|isbn=|location=|pages=151–152}}</ref> Gray has denounced Dawkins as an "anti-religious missionary", whose assertions are "in no sense novel or original," suggesting that "transfixed in wonderment at the workings of his own mind, Dawkins misses much that is of importance in human beings." Gray has also criticised Dawkins's perceived allegiance to Darwin, stating that if "science, for Darwin, was a method of inquiry that enabled him to edge tentatively and humbly toward the truth, for Dawkins, science is an unquestioned view of the world."

The Conservative philosopher Rodger Scruton accused Dawkins of 'recycling' evolution as a theory for everything such as "what the human being is, what human communities are, what our problems are and then how they’re not really our problems, but the problems of our genes".<ref>{{Cite web|title=Scruton|url=https://www.theguardian.com/books/2014/aug/15/roger-scruton-notes-on-nonsense-richard-dawkins-original-sin-islamism-and-more|last=|first=|date=|website=|url-status=live|archive-url=|archive-date=|access-date=}}</ref> Scruton has also that Dawkins [[cherry picking|cherry-picks]] his data, and ignores the benefits of religion.<ref name="spectator.co.uk" />

[[Alister McGrath]], the Anglican Priest and Theologian called him "embarrassingly ignorant of Christian theology". His book, ''[[The Dawkins Delusion?]]'' – a response to Dawkins's The God Delusion – was published by [[SPCK]] in February 2007. The author and writer Rupert Short blames Dawkins and New atheists for promoting ignorance, stating that they have peddled an idea that all people of faith share a Creationist view of the world. Writing in the Spectator he states:<blockquote>Call out superstition by all means. But don’t display culpable ignorance by likening all manifestations of faith across the world to belief in the tooth fairy. Dawkins’s new book Outgrowing God is no less crude than his earlier diatribe The God Delusion. Once more, he’s lobbed a stone in a vain bid to hit the clouds.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/richard-dawkins-and-the-ignorance-of-new-atheism-|website=www.spectator.co.uk|access-date=2020-05-28}}</ref></blockquote>In response to some of his critics, Dawkins maintains that theologians are no better than scientists in addressing deep [[cosmological]] questions and that he is not a fundamentalist, as he is willing to change his mind in the face of new evidence.{{sfn|Dawkins|2006}}<ref>{{cite web|title=When Religion Steps on Science's Turf|url=http://www.secularhumanism.org/library/fi/dawkins_18_2.html|last=Dawkins|first=Richard|year=2006|work=Free Inquiry|url-status=dead|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20080419125549/http://www.secularhumanism.org/library/fi/dawkins_18_2.html|archivedate=19 April 2008|accessdate=3 April 2008}}</ref><ref name="rdf-fundamentalist">{{cite web|title=How dare you call me a fundamentalist|url=http://old.richarddawkins.net/articles/1071-how-dare-you-call-me-a-fundamentalist|last=Dawkins|first=Richard|publisher=Richard Dawkins Foundation|url-status=dead|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20121231022508/http://old.richarddawkins.net/articles/1071-how-dare-you-call-me-a-fundamentalist|archivedate=31 December 2012|accessdate=28 December 2012}}</ref>

=== Comments on Rape and Harassment ===
While Dawkins has said that feminism is "enormously important" he has still come under fire for some comments he has made.

IN 2014 Dawkins was accused of [[victim blaming]], tweeting - "If you want to be in a position to testify & jail a man, don't get drunk," Amanda Marcotte, in ''[[Salon (website)|Salon]]'', criticized Dawkins by saying that "For someone who is a supposed rationalist, Dawkins refused to even acknowledge the basic difference between making the choice to break the law and being the victim of a crime." <ref>{{Cite web|title=Atheism's shocking woman problem: What's behind the misogyny of Richard Dawkins and Sam Harris?|url=https://www.salon.com/2014/10/03/new_atheisms_troubling_misogyny_the_pompous_sexism_of_richard_dawkins_and_sam_harris_partner/|date=2014-10-03|website=Salon|language=en|access-date=2020-05-28}}</ref> In Vice News, in an article titled, ''The Atheist Movement Needs to Disown Richard Dawkins,'' Allegra Ringo writes he buys into a 'frat-boy mentality and he 'plays by his own God-free rules'. Dawkins was also the subject of another rape controversy when he tweeted, "Date rape is bad. Stranger rape at knifepoint is worse. If you think that's an endorsement of date rape, go away and learn how to think." [[Amanda Marcotte]] criticised this by saying that "He made a pretty serious logical error…He assumed that the amount of pain that a victim of injustice suffers is directly proportional to the contemporary social norms surrounding it, i.e. if a form of abuse was considered no big deal to most people in a society, the people directly victimised would also feel that way."<ref>{{Cite web|title=Richard Dawkins explains a principle he himself refuses to adhere to|url=https://www.rawstory.com/2014/07/richard-dawkins-explains-a-principle-he-himself-refuses-to-adhere-to/|last=Amanda Marcotte|website=www.rawstory.com|language=en-US|access-date=2020-05-28}}</ref>
<br />

==== Rebecca Watson incident ====
Dawkins was denounced for his comments about a video blog post by atheist blogger and writer [[Rebecca Watson]], an atheist blogger who was harassed at a convention in Dublin.<ref name=":0">{{Cite web|title=Atheists address sexism issues|url=http://www.usatoday.com/news/religion/story/2011-09-15/atheist-sexism-women/50416454/1|website=USATODAY.COM|access-date=2020-05-28}}</ref> When Watson was in an elevator, she was propositioned by a man, who said "Don't take this the wrong way, but I find you very interesting, and I would like to talk more. Would you like to come to my hotel room for coffee?" Watson found this extremely inappropriate and later creating a post where she said "guys, don't do that." [[PZ Myers]] made a reactionary post.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Always name names! {{!}} ScienceBlogs|url=https://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2011/07/02/always-name-names|last=July 2|first=pharyngula on|last2=2011.|website=scienceblogs.com|language=en|access-date=2020-05-28}}</ref> On that post, Dawkins contrasted the "elevator incident" with the plight of [[Women in Islam|women in Islamic countries]] in a surprising post.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Dawkins, Watson and the elevator ride|url=https://mg.co.za/article/2011-09-02-dawkins-watson-and-the-elevator-ride/|date=2011-09-02|website=The Mail & Guardian|language=en-ZA|access-date=2020-05-28}}</ref><blockquote>Dear Muslima

Stop whining, will you. Yes, yes, I know you had your genitals mutilated with a razor blade, and ... yawn ... don't tell me yet again, I know you aren't allowed to drive a car, and you can't leave the house without a male relative, and your husband is allowed to beat you, and you'll be stoned to death if you commit adultery. But stop whining, will you. Think of the suffering your poor American sisters have to put up with.

Only this week I heard of one, she calls herself Skep"chick", and do you know what happened to her? A man in a hotel elevator invited her back to his room for coffee. I am not exaggerating. He really did. He invited her back to his room for coffee. Of course she said no, and of course he didn't lay a finger on her, but even so ...

And you, Muslima, think you have misogyny to complain about! For goodness sake grow up, or at least grow a thicker skin.

Richard Dawkins<ref name=":1">{{Cite web|title=Sharing a lift with Richard Dawkins|url=https://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/david-allen-green/2011/07/richard-dawkins-chewing-gum|website=www.newstatesman.com|language=en|access-date=2020-05-28}}</ref></blockquote>Dawkins was criticized by atheists, feminist groups and other for his remarks.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Richard Dawkins Torn Limb From Limb—By Atheists|url=http://gawker.com/5818993/richard-dawkins-torn-limb-from-limbby-atheists|last=Stern|first=Remy|website=Gawker|language=en|access-date=2020-05-28}}</ref> [[David Allen Green]] in ''[[New Statesman]]'' wrote that "One of the many problems here is that Rebecca didn't use her video to downplay the plight of Muslim women from the perspective of an American woman…Just because there is severe misogyny in one context doesn't remove the need to deal rationally and helpfully with its lesser manifestation in other contexts."<ref name=":1" /> PZ Myers responded by writing, "This isn't slightly bad. It's very bad. Atheist men are alienating the people we want to work with us on the very same problems…that you cited in your comment."<ref>{{Cite web|title=Oh, no, not again…once more unto the breach {{!}} ScienceBlogs|url=https://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2011/07/03/oh-no-not-againonce-more-unto|last=July 3|first=pharyngula on|last2=2011.|website=scienceblogs.com|language=en|access-date=2020-05-28}}</ref>

After trying to clarify his argument:<blockquote>The man in the elevator didn't physically touch her, didn't attempt to bar her way out of the elevator, didn't even use foul language at her […] [Rebecca] was probably offended to about the same extent as I am offended if a man gets into an elevator with me chewing gum.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Richard Dawkins Gets into a Comments War with Feminists|url=https://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2011/07/richard-dawkins-draws-feminist-wrath-over-sexual-harassment-comments/352530/|last=Dickson|first=Caitlin|date=2011-07-06|website=The Atlantic|language=en-US|access-date=2020-05-28}}</ref></blockquote>Watson herself issued the following boycott of Dawkins as a response to his posts:<blockquote>[Richard Dawkins] will no longer be rewarded with my money, my praise, my attention. I will no longer recommend his books to others, buy them as presents, or buy them for my own library. I will not attend his lectures or recommend that others do the same.</blockquote>The incident was labelled "Elevatorgate"<ref name=":0" />

=== Accusations of Islamophobia ===
Many have accused Dawkins of [[Islamophobia]]<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Emilsen|first=William W.|date=2012-08-01|title=The New Atheism and Islam|url=https://doi.org/10.1177/0014524612448737|journal=The Expository Times|language=en|volume=123|issue=11|pages=521–528|doi=10.1177/0014524612448737|issn=0014-5246}}</ref> However Dawkins has responded saying he is a frequent critic of Christianity and Islam does not get a 'free pass'. However he has also described Islam as more problematic than Christianity.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Dawkins: Islam is 'one of the great evils in the world'|url=https://stellarhousepublishing.com/richard-dawkins-islam-is-one-of-the-great-evils-of-the-world/|last=N.B.|website=Stellar House Publishing|language=en-US|access-date=2020-05-28}}</ref> He as also maintained that he is critical of "the appalling misogyny and homophobia of Islam, I have criticised the murdering of apostates for no crime other than their disbelief"<ref name=":2">{{Cite web|title=Richard Dawkins responds after being accused of Islamophobia|url=http://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/richard-dawkins-islamophobic-berkeley-event-cancelled-islam-muslim-uc-university-california-a7860281.html|date=2017-07-26|website=The Independent|language=en|access-date=2020-05-28}}</ref>, he is only critical of these practices and beliefs and thus is far from attacking muslims.<ref name=":2" />

Dawkins generated controversy when he tweeted "All the world's Muslims have fewer [[Nobel Prizes]] than Trinity College, Cambridge. They did great things in the Middle Ages, though."<ref>{{Cite web|title=HuffPost is now a part of Verizon Media|url=https://consent.yahoo.com/collectConsent?sessionId=1_cc-session_c2b752a6-7a8c-4944-846e-cf60518d0669&lang=en-gb&inline=false|website=consent.yahoo.com|access-date=2020-05-28}}</ref> These comments generated controversy. Defending himself he went on to say:<blockquote>"You can attack someone for his opinion. But for simply stating an intriguing fact? Who would guess that a single Cambridge College" and "Muslims aren't a race. What they have in common is a religion. Rather than Trinity, would you prefer the comparison with Jews? Google it."</blockquote>[[Owen Jones]] commented, "How dare you dress your bigotry up as atheism. You are now beyond an embarrassment."<ref>{{Cite news|last=Meikle|first=James|date=2013-08-08|title=Richard Dawkins criticised for Twitter comment about Muslims|language=en-GB|work=The Guardian|url=https://www.theguardian.com/science/2013/aug/08/richard-dawkins-twitter-row-muslims-cambridge|access-date=2020-05-28|issn=0261-3077}}</ref>

Critics have also hit out at comments he made on twitter saying <blockquote>Of course you can have an opinion about Islam without having read [[Qur'an]]. You don't have to read ''[[Mein Kampf]]'' to have an opinion about [[Nazism]]." <ref name=":3">{{Cite web|title=A Short History of Richard Dawkins vs. The Internet|url=https://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2013/08/short-history-richard-dawkins-vs-internet/312350/|last=Ohlheiser|first=Abby|date=2013-08-08|website=The Atlantic|language=en-US|access-date=2020-05-28}}</ref></blockquote>Dawkins has also stated that "Islam is the greatest force for evil in the world today"<ref>{{Cite news|date=2017-07-24|title=Richard Dawkins in US Islamophobia row|language=en-GB|work=BBC News|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-40710165|access-date=2020-05-28}}</ref>, generating further controversy and accusations of Islamophobia. He did however state that these comments were in reference to [[Islamism]].<ref>{{Cite web|title=Richard Dawkins responds after being accused of Islamophobia|url=http://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/richard-dawkins-islamophobic-berkeley-event-cancelled-islam-muslim-uc-university-california-a7860281.html|date=2017-07-26|website=The Independent|language=en|access-date=2020-05-28}}</ref>

Other tweets occurred when at a debate at University College London when a Muslim speaker tried to segregate the sexes causing much controversy however Abby Ohlheiser writes in the Atlantic that 'Dawkins's response probably gained more attention than the incident itself: <ref name=":3" /><blockquote>''<nowiki/>'Who the hell do these Muslims think they are? At UCL of all places, tried to segregate the sexes in debate between @LKrauss1 and a Muslim.'<nowiki/>'' <ref>{{Cite web|title=Who the hell do these Muslims think they are? At UCL of all places, tried to segregate the sexes in debate between @LKrauss1 and a Muslim|url=https://twitter.com/RichardDawkins/status/310609436722995201?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E310609436722995201&ref_url=https://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2013/08/short-history-richard-dawkins-vs-internet/312350/|last=Dawkins|first=Richard|date=2013-03-09|website=@RichardDawkins|language=en|access-date=2020-05-28}}</ref>and ''<nowiki/>'How has UCL come to this: cowardly capitulation to Muslims? Tried to segregate sexes in debate between @LKrauss1 and some Muslim or other.''' <ref>{{Cite web|title=Richard Dawkins (@RichardDawkins) {{!}} Twitter|url=https://twitter.com/RichardDawkins?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E310609785252888576&ref_url=https://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2013/08/short-history-richard-dawkins-vs-internet/312350/|website=twitter.com|language=en|access-date=2020-05-28}}</ref></blockquote>His comments generated controversy, Dawkins mocked those who were calling him racist stating all he believe is that Muslims should not segregate the sexes.<ref>{{Cite web|title=I don't think Muslims should segregate sexes at University College London events. Oh NO, how very ISLAMOPHOBIC of me. How RACIST of me.|url=https://twitter.com/RichardDawkins/status/310611998360625152?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E310611998360625152&ref_url=https://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2013/08/short-history-richard-dawkins-vs-internet/312350/|last=Dawkins|first=Richard|date=2013-03-09|website=@RichardDawkins|language=en|access-date=2020-05-28}}</ref>

Dawkins also commented on the short film ''[[Fitna (film)|Fitna]]'', saying "[[Geert Wilders]], if it should turn out that you are a racist or a gratuitous stirrer and provocateur I withdraw my respect, but on the strength of ''Fitna'' alone I salute you as a man of courage, who has the balls to stand up to a monstrous enemy."<ref name=":3" />The film created an [[International reactions to Fitna|international uproar]], many saying it made Islam out to be the same as Islamism<ref>{{Cite news|last=Eteraz|first=Ali|date=2008-03-28|title=The Fitna farce|language=en-GB|work=The Guardian|url=https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2008/mar/28/thefitnafarce|access-date=2020-05-28|issn=0261-3077}}</ref>.

== Awards and recognition ==
[[File:Deschner Dawkins.jpg|thumb|right|upright|Receiving the [[Giordano Bruno Foundation|Deschner Prize]] in [[Frankfurt]], 12 October 2007, from [[Karlheinz Deschner]]]]
[[File:Deschner Dawkins.jpg|thumb|right|upright|Receiving the [[Giordano Bruno Foundation|Deschner Prize]] in [[Frankfurt]], 12 October 2007, from [[Karlheinz Deschner]]]]



Revision as of 03:30, 28 May 2020

Richard Dawkins
Dawkins in 2010
Born
Clinton Richard Dawkins

(1941-03-26) 26 March 1941 (age 83)
CitizenshipUnited Kingdom
EducationOundle School
Alma materUniversity of Oxford (MA, DPhil)
Known for
Spouse(s)
(m. 1967; div. 1984)

Eve Barham
(m. 1984; div. 19??)
Lalla Ward
(m. 1992; sep. 2016)
Children1
Awards
Scientific career
InstitutionsUniversity of California, Berkeley
New College, Oxford
University of Oxford
New College of the Humanities
ThesisSelective pecking in the domestic chick (1967)
Doctoral advisorNikolaas Tinbergen
Doctoral students
Websitericharddawkins.net
Signature

Richard Dawkins FRS FRSL (born Clinton Richard Dawkins; 26 March 1941)[24] is an English ethologist, evolutionary biologist, and author. He is an emeritus fellow of New College, Oxford, and was the University of Oxford's Professor for Public Understanding of Science from 1995 until 2008.

Dawkins first came to prominence with his 1976 book The Selfish Gene, which popularised the gene-centred view of evolution and introduced the term meme. With his book The Extended Phenotype (1982), he introduced into evolutionary biology the influential concept that the phenotypic effects of a gene are not necessarily limited to an organism's body, but can stretch far into the environment. In 2006, he founded the Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason and Science.

Dawkins is known as an outspoken atheist. He is well known for his criticism of creationism and intelligent design. In The Blind Watchmaker (1986), he argues against the watchmaker analogy, an argument for the existence of a supernatural creator based upon the complexity of living organisms. Instead, he describes evolutionary processes as analogous to a blind watchmaker, in that reproduction, mutation, and selection are unguided by any designer. In The God Delusion (2006), Dawkins contends that a supernatural creator almost certainly does not exist and that religious faith is a delusion.

Dawkins has been awarded academic and writing awards, and he makes television, radio, and Internet appearances, predominantly discussing his books, atheism, and his ideas and opinions as a public intellectual.[25]

Background

Early life

Clinton Richard Dawkins was born in Nairobi, then in British Kenya, on 26 March 1941.[26] Dawkins later dropped Clinton from his name by deed poll.[24] He is the son of Jean Mary Vyvyan (née Ladner; 1916–2019)[27][28] and Clinton John Dawkins (1915–2010), an agricultural civil servant in the British Colonial Service in Nyasaland (present-day Malawi), of an Oxfordshire landed gentry family.[26][29][30] His father was called up into the King's African Rifles during World War II[31][32] and returned to England in 1949, when Dawkins was eight. His father had inherited a country estate, Over Norton Park in Oxfordshire, which he farmed commercially.[30] Dawkins considers himself English and lives in Oxford, England.[33][34][35][36] He has a younger sister, Sarah.[37]

Both his parents were interested in natural sciences, and they answered Dawkins's questions in scientific terms.[38] Dawkins describes his childhood as "a normal Anglican upbringing".[39] He embraced Christianity until halfway through his teenage years, at which point he concluded that the theory of evolution was a better explanation for life's complexity, and ceased believing in a god.[37] Dawkins states: "The main residual reason why I was religious was from being so impressed with the complexity of life and feeling that it had to have a designer, and I think it was when I realised that Darwinism was a far superior explanation that pulled the rug out from under the argument of design. And that left me with nothing."[37]

Education

The Great Hall, Oundle School

From 1954 to 1959 Dawkins attended Oundle School in Northamptonshire, an English public school with a Church of England ethos,[37] where he was in Laundimer House.[40] While at Oundle, Dawkins read Bertrand Russell's Why I Am Not a Christian for the first time.[41] He studied zoology at Balliol College, Oxford, graduating in 1962; while there, he was tutored by Nobel Prize-winning ethologist Nikolaas Tinbergen. He graduated with second-class honours.[42] He continued as a research student under Tinbergen's supervision, receiving his MA and Doctor of Philosophy[43] degrees by 1966, and remained a research assistant for another year.[44][45] Tinbergen was a pioneer in the study of animal behaviour, particularly in the areas of instinct, learning, and choice;[46] Dawkins's research in this period concerned models of animal decision-making.[47]

Teaching

From 1967 to 1969, Dawkins was an assistant professor of zoology at the University of California, Berkeley. During this period, the students and faculty at UC Berkeley were largely opposed to the ongoing Vietnam War, and Dawkins became involved in the anti-war demonstrations and activities.[48] He returned to the University of Oxford in 1970 as a lecturer. In 1990, he became a reader in zoology. In 1995, he was appointed Simonyi Professor for the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford, a position that had been endowed by Charles Simonyi with the express intention that the holder "be expected to make important contributions to the public understanding of some scientific field",[49] and that its first holder should be Richard Dawkins.[50] He held that professorship from 1995 until 2008.[51]

Since 1970, he has been a fellow of New College, Oxford, and he is now an emeritus fellow.[52][53] He has delivered many lectures, including the Henry Sidgwick Memorial Lecture (1989), the first Erasmus Darwin Memorial Lecture (1990), the Michael Faraday Lecture (1991), the T. H. Huxley Memorial Lecture (1992), the Irvine Memorial Lecture (1997), the Tinbergen Lecture (2004), and the Tanner Lectures (2003).[44] In 1991, he gave the Royal Institution Christmas Lectures for Children on Growing Up in the Universe. He also has edited several journals, and has acted as editorial advisor to the Encarta Encyclopedia and the Encyclopedia of Evolution. He is listed as a senior editor and a columnist of the Council for Secular Humanism's Free Inquiry magazine, and has been a member of the editorial board of Skeptic magazine since its foundation.[54]

Dawkins has sat on judging panels for awards as diverse as the Royal Society's Faraday Award and the British Academy Television Awards,[44] and has been president of the Biological Sciences section of the British Association for the Advancement of Science. In 2004, Balliol College, Oxford, instituted the Dawkins Prize, awarded for "outstanding research into the ecology and behaviour of animals whose welfare and survival may be endangered by human activities".[55] In September 2008, he retired from his professorship, announcing plans to "write a book aimed at youngsters in which he will warn them against believing in 'anti-scientific' fairytales."[56]

In 2011, Dawkins joined the professoriate of the New College of the Humanities, a private university in London established by A. C. Grayling, which opened in September 2012.[57]

Work

Evolutionary biology

At the University of Texas at Austin, March 2008

Dawkins is best known for his popularisation of the gene as the principal unit of selection in evolution; this view is most clearly set out in his books:[58][59]

  • The Selfish Gene (1976), in which he notes that "all life evolves by the differential survival of replicating entities".
  • The Extended Phenotype (1982), in which he describes natural selection as "the process whereby replicators out-propagate each other". He introduces to a wider audience the influential concept he presented in 1977,[60] that the phenotypic effects of a gene are not necessarily limited to an organism's body, but can stretch far into the environment, including the bodies of other organisms. Dawkins regarded the extended phenotype as his single most important contribution to evolutionary biology and he considered niche construction to be a special case of extended phenotype. The concept of extended phenotype helps explain evolution, but it does not help predict specific outcomes.[61]

Dawkins has consistently been sceptical about non-adaptive processes in evolution (such as spandrels, described by Gould and Lewontin)[62] and about selection at levels "above" that of the gene.[63] He is particularly sceptical about the practical possibility or importance of group selection as a basis for understanding altruism.[64] This behaviour appears at first to be an evolutionary paradox, since helping others costs precious resources and decreases one's own fitness. Previously, many had interpreted this as an aspect of group selection: individuals are doing what is best for the survival of the population or species as a whole. British evolutionary biologist W. D. Hamilton used gene-frequency analysis in his inclusive fitness theory to show how hereditary altruistic traits can evolve if there is sufficient genetic similarity between actors and recipients of such altruism (including close relatives).[65][a] Hamilton's inclusive fitness has since been successfully applied to a wide range of organisms, including humans. Similarly, Robert Trivers, thinking in terms of the gene-centred model, developed the theory of reciprocal altruism, whereby one organism provides a benefit to another in the expectation of future reciprocation.[66] Dawkins popularised these ideas in The Selfish Gene, and developed them in his own work.[67] In June 2012, Dawkins was highly critical of fellow biologist E. O. Wilson's 2012 book The Social Conquest of Earth as misunderstanding Hamilton's theory of kin selection.[68][69] Dawkins has also been strongly critical of the Gaia hypothesis of the independent scientist James Lovelock.[70][71][72]

Critics of Dawkins's biological approach suggest that taking the gene as the unit of selection (a single event in which an individual either succeeds or fails to reproduce) is misleading. The gene could be better described, they say, as a unit of evolution (the long-term changes in allele frequencies in a population).[73] In The Selfish Gene, Dawkins explains that he is using George C. Williams's definition of the gene as "that which segregates and recombines with appreciable frequency".[74] Another common objection is that a gene cannot survive alone, but must cooperate with other genes to build an individual, and therefore a gene cannot be an independent "unit".[75] In The Extended Phenotype, Dawkins suggests that from an individual gene's viewpoint, all other genes are part of the environment to which it is adapted.

Advocates for higher levels of selection (such as Richard Lewontin, David Sloan Wilson, and Elliott Sober) suggest that there are many phenomena (including altruism) that gene-based selection cannot satisfactorily explain. The philosopher Mary Midgley, with whom Dawkins clashed in print concerning The Selfish Gene,[76][77] has criticised gene selection, memetics, and sociobiology as being excessively reductionist;[78] she has suggested that the popularity of Dawkins's work is due to factors in the Zeitgeist such as the increased individualism of the Thatcher/Reagan decades.[79]

In a set of controversies over the mechanisms and interpretation of evolution (what has been called 'The Darwin Wars'),[80][81] one faction is often named after Dawkins, while the other faction is named after the American palaeontologist Stephen Jay Gould, reflecting the pre-eminence of each as a populariser of the pertinent ideas.[82][83] In particular, Dawkins and Gould have been prominent commentators in the controversy over sociobiology and evolutionary psychology, with Dawkins generally approving and Gould generally being critical.[84] A typical example of Dawkins's position is his scathing review of Not in Our Genes by Steven Rose, Leon J. Kamin, and Richard C. Lewontin.[85] Two other thinkers who are often considered to be allied with Dawkins on the subject are Steven Pinker and Daniel Dennett; Dennett has promoted a gene-centred view of evolution and defended reductionism in biology.[86] Despite their academic disagreements, Dawkins and Gould did not have a hostile personal relationship, and Dawkins dedicated a large portion of his 2003 book A Devil's Chaplain posthumously to Gould, who had died the previous year.

When asked if Darwinism informs his everyday apprehension of life, Dawkins says, "In one way it does. My eyes are constantly wide open to the extraordinary fact of existence. Not just human existence but the existence of life and how this breathtakingly powerful process, which is natural selection, has managed to take the very simple facts of physics and chemistry and build them up to redwood trees and humans. That's never far from my thoughts, that sense of amazement. On the other hand I certainly don't allow Darwinism to influence my feelings about human social life," implying that he feels that individual human beings can opt out of the survival machine of Darwinism since they are freed by the consciousness of self.[36]

Fathering the meme

In his book The Selfish Gene, Dawkins coined the word meme (the behavioural equivalent of a gene) as a way to encourage readers to think about how Darwinian principles might be extended beyond the realm of genes.[87] It was intended as an extension of his "replicators" argument, but it took on a life of its own in the hands of other authors, such as Daniel Dennett and Susan Blackmore. These popularisations then led to the emergence of memetics, a field from which Dawkins has distanced himself.[88]

Dawkins's meme refers to any cultural entity that an observer might consider a replicator of a certain idea or set of ideas. He hypothesised that people could view many cultural entities as capable of such replication, generally through communication and contact with humans, who have evolved as efficient (although not perfect) copiers of information and behaviour. Because memes are not always copied perfectly, they might become refined, combined, or otherwise modified with other ideas; this results in new memes, which may themselves prove more or less efficient replicators than their predecessors, thus providing a framework for a hypothesis of cultural evolution based on memes, a notion that is analogous to the theory of biological evolution based on genes.[89]

Although Dawkins invented the term meme, he has not claimed that the idea was entirely novel,[90] and there have been other expressions for similar ideas in the past. For instance, John Laurent has suggested that the term may have derived from the work of the little-known German biologist Richard Semon.[91] Semon regarded "mneme" as the collective set of neural memory traces (conscious or subconscious) that were inherited, although such view would be considered as Lamarckian by modern biologists.[92] Laurent also found the use of the term mneme in Maurice Maeterlinck's The Life of the White Ant (1926), and Maeterlinck himself stated that he obtained the phrase from Semon's work.[91] In his own work, Maeterlinck tried to explain memory in termites and ants by claiming that neural memory traces were added "upon the individual mneme".[92] Nonetheless, James Gleick describes Dawkins's concept of the meme as "his most famous memorable invention, far more influential than his selfish genes or his later proselytising against religiosity".[93]

Foundation

In 2006, Dawkins founded the Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason and Science (RDFRS), a non-profit organisation. RDFRS financed research on the psychology of belief and religion, financed scientific education programs and materials, and publicised and supported charitable organisations that are secular in nature.[94] In January 2016, it was announced that the foundation was merging with the Center for Inquiry, with Dawkins becoming a member of the new organization's board of directors.[95]

Criticism of religion

Lecturing on his book The God Delusion, 24 June 2006

Dawkins was confirmed into the Church of England at the age of 13, but began to grow sceptical of the beliefs. He said that his understanding of science and evolutionary processes led him to question how adults in positions of leadership in a civilised world could still be so uneducated in biology,[96] and is puzzled by how belief in God could remain among individuals who are sophisticated in science. Dawkins notes that some physicists use 'God' as a metaphor for the general awe-inspiring mysteries of the universe, which causes confusion and misunderstanding among people who incorrectly think they are talking about a mystical being who forgives sins, transubstantiates wine, or makes people live after they die.[97] He disagrees with Stephen Jay Gould's principle of nonoverlapping magisteria (NOMA)[98] and suggests that the existence of God should be treated as a scientific hypothesis like any other.[99] Dawkins became a prominent critic of religion and has stated his opposition to religion as twofold: religion is both a source of conflict and a justification for belief without evidence.[100] He considers faith—belief that is not based on evidence—as "one of the world's great evils".[101]

On his spectrum of theistic probability, which has seven levels between 1 (100% certainty that a God or gods exist) and 7 (100% certainty that a God or gods do not exist), Dawkins has said he is a 6.9, which represents a "de facto atheist" who thinks "I cannot know for certain but I think God is very improbable, and I live my life on the assumption that he is not there." When asked about his slight uncertainty, Dawkins quips, "I am agnostic to the extent that I am agnostic about fairies at the bottom of the garden."[102][103] In May 2014, at the Hay Festival in Wales, Dawkins explained that while he does not believe in the supernatural elements of the Christian faith, he still has nostalgia for the ceremonial side of religion.[104] In addition to beliefs in deities, Dawkins has criticized religious beliefs as irrational, such as that Jesus turned water into wine, that an embryo starts as a blob, that magic underwear will protect you, that Jesus was resurrected, that semen comes from the spine, that Jesus walked on water, that the sun sets in a marsh, that the Garden of Eden existed in Missouri, that Jesus' mother was a virgin, that Muhammad split the moon, and that Lazarus was raised from the dead.[112]

Dawkins has risen to prominence in public debates concerning science and religion since the publication of his most popular book, The God Delusion, in 2006, which became an international best seller.[113] As of 2015, more than three million copies have been sold and the book has been translated into over 30 languages.[114] Its success has been seen by many as indicative of a change in the contemporary cultural zeitgeist and has also been identified with the rise of New Atheism.[115] In the book, Dawkins contends that a supernatural creator almost certainly does not exist and that religious faith is a delusion—"a fixed false belief".[116] In his February 2002 TED talk entitled "Militant atheism", Dawkins urged all atheists to openly state their position and to fight the incursion of the church into politics and science.[117] On 30 September 2007, Dawkins, Christopher Hitchens, Sam Harris, and Daniel Dennett met at Hitchens's residence for a private, unmoderated discussion that lasted two hours. The event was videotaped and entitled "The Four Horsemen".[118]

Dawkins sees education and consciousness-raising as the primary tools in opposing what he considers to be religious dogma and indoctrination.[48][119][120] These tools include the fight against certain stereotypes, and he has adopted the term bright as a way of associating positive public connotations with those who possess a naturalistic worldview.[120] He has given support to the idea of a free-thinking school,[121] which would not "indoctrinate children" but would instead teach children to ask for evidence and be skeptical, critical, and open-minded. Such a school, says Dawkins, should "teach comparative religion, and teach it properly without any bias towards particular religions, and including historically important but dead religions, such as those of ancient Greece and the Norse gods, if only because these, like the Abrahamic scriptures, are important for understanding English literature and European history.[122][123] Inspired by the consciousness-raising successes of feminists in arousing widespread embarrassment at the routine use of "he" instead of "she", Dawkins similarly suggests that phrases such as "Catholic child" and "Muslim child" should be considered as socially absurd as, for instance, "Marxist child", as he believes that children should not be classified based on the ideological or religious beliefs of their parents.[120]

Criticism of creationism

Dawkins is a prominent critic of creationism, a religious belief that humanity, life, and the universe were created by a deity[124] without recourse to evolution.[125] He has described the Young Earth creationist view that the Earth is only a few thousand years old as "a preposterous, mind-shrinking falsehood".[126] His 1986 book, The Blind Watchmaker, contains a sustained critique of the argument from design, an important creationist argument. In the book, Dawkins argues against the watchmaker analogy made famous by the eighteenth-century English theologian William Paley via his book Natural Theology, in which Paley argues that just as a watch is too complicated and too functional to have sprung into existence merely by accident, so too must all living things—with their far greater complexity—be purposefully designed. Dawkins shares the view generally held by scientists that natural selection is sufficient to explain the apparent functionality and non-random complexity of the biological world, and can be said to play the role of watchmaker in nature, albeit as an automatic, unguided by any designer, nonintelligent, blind watchmaker.[127]

Wearing a scarlet 'A' lapel pin, at the 34th annual conference of American Atheists (2008)

In 1986, Dawkins and biologist John Maynard Smith participated in an Oxford Union debate against A. E. Wilder-Smith (a Young Earth creationist) and Edgar Andrews (president of the Biblical Creation Society).[b] In general, however, Dawkins has followed the advice of his late colleague Stephen Jay Gould and refused to participate in formal debates with creationists because "what they seek is the oxygen of respectability", and doing so would "give them this oxygen by the mere act of engaging with them at all". He suggests that creationists "don't mind being beaten in an argument. What matters is that we give them recognition by bothering to argue with them in public."[128] In a December 2004 interview with American journalist Bill Moyers, Dawkins said that "among the things that science does know, evolution is about as certain as anything we know." When Moyers questioned him on the use of the word theory, Dawkins stated that "evolution has been observed. It's just that it hasn't been observed while it's happening." He added that "it is rather like a detective coming on a murder after the scene... the detective hasn't actually seen the murder take place, of course. But what you do see is a massive clue... Huge quantities of circumstantial evidence. It might as well be spelled out in words of English."[129]

Dawkins has opposed the inclusion of intelligent design in science education, describing it as "not a scientific argument at all, but a religious one".[130] He has been referred to in the media as "Darwin's Rottweiler",[131][132] a reference to English biologist T. H. Huxley, who was known as "Darwin's Bulldog" for his advocacy of Charles Darwin's evolutionary ideas. He has been a strong critic of the British organisation Truth in Science, which promotes the teaching of creationism in state schools, and whose work Dawkins has described as an "educational scandal". He plans to subsidise schools through the Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason and Science with the delivery of books, DVDs, and pamphlets that counteract their work.[133]

Political views

With Ariane Sherine at the Atheist Bus Campaign launch in London

Dawkins is an outspoken atheist[134] and a supporter of various atheist, secular, and humanistic organisations,[44][135][136][137][138][139][140] including Humanists UK and the Brights movement.[117] Dawkins suggests that atheists should be proud, not apologetic, stressing that atheism is evidence of a healthy, independent mind.[141] He hopes that the more atheists identify themselves, the more the public will become aware of just how many people are nonbelievers, thereby reducing the negative opinion of atheism among the religious majority.[142] Inspired by the gay rights movement, he endorsed the Out Campaign to encourage atheists worldwide to declare their stance publicly.[143] He supported a UK atheist advertising initiative, the Atheist Bus Campaign in 2008, which aimed to raise funds to place atheist advertisements on buses in the London area.[144]

Speaking at Kepler's Books, Menlo Park, California, 29 October 2006
Dawkins discusses free speech and Islam(ism) at the 2017 Conference on Free Expression and Conscience

Dawkins has expressed concern about the growth of human population and about the matter of overpopulation.[145] In The Selfish Gene, he briefly mentions population growth, giving the example of Latin America, whose population, at the time the book was written, was doubling every 40 years. He is critical of Roman Catholic attitudes to family planning and population control, stating that leaders who forbid contraception and "express a preference for 'natural' methods of population limitation" will get just such a method in the form of starvation.[146]

As a supporter of the Great Ape Project—a movement to extend certain moral and legal rights to all great apes—Dawkins contributed the article 'Gaps in the Mind' to the Great Ape Project book edited by Paola Cavalieri and Peter Singer. In this essay, he criticises contemporary society's moral attitudes as being based on a "discontinuous, speciesist imperative".[147]

Dawkins also regularly comments in newspapers and blogs on contemporary political questions and is a frequent contributor to the online science and culture digest 3 Quarks Daily.[148] His opinions include opposition to the 2003 invasion of Iraq,[149] the British nuclear deterrent, the actions of then-US President George W. Bush,[150] and the ethics of designer babies.[151] Several such articles were included in A Devil's Chaplain, an anthology of writings about science, religion, and politics. He is also a supporter of Republic's campaign to replace the British monarchy with a democratically elected president.[152]

Dawkins has described himself as a Labour voter in the 1970s[153] and In 2009 Dawkins participated in a New Statesman project called "20 ways to save Labour" where he among others gave suggestions about how to make the Labour Party better. Dawkins's contribution stated:

Stop toadying to Muslims and other "faith communities" as part of a general abolition of all religious privilege. Withdraw government support from schools that abuse children by teaching them they belong to a particular religion (as opposed to teaching them about religions and letting them make up their own minds when they are old enough). Abolish the automatic right of religious organizations to charitable status, and the automatic right of bishops to sit in the House of Lords.[154]

He has been a voter for the Liberal Democrats since the party's creation. In 2009, he spoke at the party's conference in opposition to blasphemy laws, alternative medicine, and faith schools. In the UK general election of 2010, Dawkins officially endorsed the Liberal Democrats, in support of their campaign for electoral reform and for their "refusal to pander to 'faith'".[155] In the run up to the 2017 general election, Dawkins once again endorsed the Liberal Democrats and urged voters to join the party.

In 1998, Dawkins expressed his appreciation for two books connected with the Sokal affair, Higher Superstition: The Academic Left and Its Quarrels with Science by Paul R. Gross and Norman Levitt and Intellectual Impostures by Sokal and Jean Bricmont. These books are famous for their criticism of postmodernism in US universities (namely in the departments of literary studies, anthropology, and other cultural studies).[156]

Dawkins has voiced his support for the Campaign for the Establishment of a United Nations Parliamentary Assembly, an organisation that campaigns for democratic reform in the United Nations, and the creation of a more accountable international political system.[157]

Dawkins identifies as a feminist.[158] Dawkins has said that feminism is "enormously important" and "a political movement that deserves to be supported".[159]

Other fields

Jayce Lewis alongside Richard Dawkins at the Home of Dawkins working together on Jayce's album Million (Part 2), 2018

In his role as professor for public understanding of science, Dawkins has been a critic of pseudoscience and alternative medicine. His 1998 book Unweaving the Rainbow considers John Keats's accusation that by explaining the rainbow, Isaac Newton diminished its beauty; Dawkins argues for the opposite conclusion. He suggests that deep space, the billions of years of life's evolution, and the microscopic workings of biology and heredity contain more beauty and wonder than do "myths" and "pseudoscience".[160] For John Diamond's posthumously published Snake Oil, a book devoted to debunking alternative medicine, Dawkins wrote a foreword in which he asserts that alternative medicine is harmful, if only because it distracts patients from more successful conventional treatments and gives people false hopes.[161] Dawkins states that "There is no alternative medicine. There is only medicine that works and medicine that doesn't work."[162] In his 2007 Channel 4 TV film The Enemies of Reason, Dawkins concluded that Britain is gripped by "an epidemic of superstitious thinking".[163]

Continuing a long-standing partnership with Channel 4, Dawkins participated in a five-part television series, Genius of Britain, along with fellow scientists Stephen Hawking, James Dyson, Paul Nurse, and Jim Al-Khalili. The series was first broadcast in June 2010, and focuses on major, British, scientific achievements throughout history.[164]

In 2014 he joined the global awareness movement Asteroid Day as a "100x Signatory".[165]

Dawkins worked alongside Welsh Musician Jayce Lewis contributing a recorded spoken word for the track "Exhale" from his 1998 book Unweaving the Rainbow to the Welshman's third full-length album Million.


Controversy and Criticism

While is contribution to Science and rationalism cannot be doubted, Dawkins has attracted much criticism from fellow academics and philosophers as well as attracted much controversy in relation to some of his comments.

Criticism by scientists

A study of British Scientists by Rice University brought about heavy criticism of Dawkins. In an in-depth study of 137 British scientists 48 referenced Dawkins despite no questions being asked about him, 80% said they thought that Dawkins misrepresents science and scientists in his books and public speeches. Another common criticism was that Dawkins was too strong in his criticism of religion, one non religious biology professor described him as a “fundamental atheist' another said he was on a "crusade". However it should be noted 20% did mention him with positive views, owing to him challenging creationists and those who adhere to intelligent design. Paul Fidalgo, of the centre for inquiry, also challenged the saying that Dawkins has inspired millions and due to the size pool of the study this was understandable. [166]

In 2014 biologist and Harvard University professor, E.O Wilson, criticised Dawkins on Newsnight calling him a Journalist and not a scientist.[167]His comments are below:

“There is no dispute between me and Richard Dawkins and there never has been, because he’s a journalist, and journalists are people that report what the scientists have found and the arguments I’ve had have actually been with scientists doing research,”

He also went on to answer questions about his opinions on Dawkins' book the selfish gene, stating:

“I have abandoned it and I think most serious scientists working on it have abandoned it. Some defenders may be out there, but they have been relatively or almost totally silenced since our major paper came out.”

The paper he referred to was a 2010 study published in Nature entitled The evolution of eusociality. Dawkins attributed Wilson's comments to a disagreement over kin selection, later tweeting “I greatly admire EO Wilson & his huge contributions to entomology, ecology, biogeography, conservation, etc. He’s just wrong on kin selection.” He later elaborated referencing a critical Prospect Magazine review of Wilson’s book The Social Conquest of Earth. [168]

Nobel Prize-winning theoretical physicist Peter Higgs and astrophysicist Martin Rees has equated Dawkins with the religious fundamentalists he criticises saying he has adopted "fundamentalist" view of non-atheists.

Other scientists have accused him of promoting Scientism, such as Dr Francis Collins the head of the National Institute of Health[169]

Criticism by theologians and philosophers

Atheist philosophers such as Massimo Pigliucci, Michael Ruse and John Gray have criticised Dawkins. Their comments are below.

Ruse has that Dawkins would fail introductory courses on the study of philosophy or religion. He has also said that Dawkins and New Atheism does science a "grave disservice" and does a "disservice to scholarship" at more general level. Ruse then stated that The God Delusion made him 'ashamed to be an atheist'.[170][171] Pigliucci has accused Dawkins and the leaders of the new atheism movement as adhering to scientism also saying, "I would actually go so far as to charge many of the leaders of the New Atheism movement (and, by implication, a good number of their followers) with anti-intellectualism, one mark of which is a lack of respect for the proper significance, value, and methods of another field of intellectual endeavor."[172] Gray has denounced Dawkins as an "anti-religious missionary", whose assertions are "in no sense novel or original," suggesting that "transfixed in wonderment at the workings of his own mind, Dawkins misses much that is of importance in human beings." Gray has also criticised Dawkins's perceived allegiance to Darwin, stating that if "science, for Darwin, was a method of inquiry that enabled him to edge tentatively and humbly toward the truth, for Dawkins, science is an unquestioned view of the world."

The Conservative philosopher Rodger Scruton accused Dawkins of 'recycling' evolution as a theory for everything such as "what the human being is, what human communities are, what our problems are and then how they’re not really our problems, but the problems of our genes".[173] Scruton has also that Dawkins cherry-picks his data, and ignores the benefits of religion.[174]

Alister McGrath, the Anglican Priest and Theologian called him "embarrassingly ignorant of Christian theology". His book, The Dawkins Delusion? – a response to Dawkins's The God Delusion – was published by SPCK in February 2007. The author and writer Rupert Short blames Dawkins and New atheists for promoting ignorance, stating that they have peddled an idea that all people of faith share a Creationist view of the world. Writing in the Spectator he states:

Call out superstition by all means. But don’t display culpable ignorance by likening all manifestations of faith across the world to belief in the tooth fairy. Dawkins’s new book Outgrowing God is no less crude than his earlier diatribe The God Delusion. Once more, he’s lobbed a stone in a vain bid to hit the clouds.[175]

In response to some of his critics, Dawkins maintains that theologians are no better than scientists in addressing deep cosmological questions and that he is not a fundamentalist, as he is willing to change his mind in the face of new evidence.[176][177][178]

Comments on Rape and Harassment

While Dawkins has said that feminism is "enormously important" he has still come under fire for some comments he has made.

IN 2014 Dawkins was accused of victim blaming, tweeting - "If you want to be in a position to testify & jail a man, don't get drunk," Amanda Marcotte, in Salon, criticized Dawkins by saying that "For someone who is a supposed rationalist, Dawkins refused to even acknowledge the basic difference between making the choice to break the law and being the victim of a crime." [179] In Vice News, in an article titled, The Atheist Movement Needs to Disown Richard Dawkins, Allegra Ringo writes he buys into a 'frat-boy mentality and he 'plays by his own God-free rules'. Dawkins was also the subject of another rape controversy when he tweeted, "Date rape is bad. Stranger rape at knifepoint is worse. If you think that's an endorsement of date rape, go away and learn how to think." Amanda Marcotte criticised this by saying that "He made a pretty serious logical error…He assumed that the amount of pain that a victim of injustice suffers is directly proportional to the contemporary social norms surrounding it, i.e. if a form of abuse was considered no big deal to most people in a society, the people directly victimised would also feel that way."[180]

Rebecca Watson incident

Dawkins was denounced for his comments about a video blog post by atheist blogger and writer Rebecca Watson, an atheist blogger who was harassed at a convention in Dublin.[181] When Watson was in an elevator, she was propositioned by a man, who said "Don't take this the wrong way, but I find you very interesting, and I would like to talk more. Would you like to come to my hotel room for coffee?" Watson found this extremely inappropriate and later creating a post where she said "guys, don't do that." PZ Myers made a reactionary post.[182] On that post, Dawkins contrasted the "elevator incident" with the plight of women in Islamic countries in a surprising post.[183]

Dear Muslima

Stop whining, will you. Yes, yes, I know you had your genitals mutilated with a razor blade, and ... yawn ... don't tell me yet again, I know you aren't allowed to drive a car, and you can't leave the house without a male relative, and your husband is allowed to beat you, and you'll be stoned to death if you commit adultery. But stop whining, will you. Think of the suffering your poor American sisters have to put up with.

Only this week I heard of one, she calls herself Skep"chick", and do you know what happened to her? A man in a hotel elevator invited her back to his room for coffee. I am not exaggerating. He really did. He invited her back to his room for coffee. Of course she said no, and of course he didn't lay a finger on her, but even so ...

And you, Muslima, think you have misogyny to complain about! For goodness sake grow up, or at least grow a thicker skin.

Richard Dawkins[184]

Dawkins was criticized by atheists, feminist groups and other for his remarks.[185] David Allen Green in New Statesman wrote that "One of the many problems here is that Rebecca didn't use her video to downplay the plight of Muslim women from the perspective of an American woman…Just because there is severe misogyny in one context doesn't remove the need to deal rationally and helpfully with its lesser manifestation in other contexts."[184] PZ Myers responded by writing, "This isn't slightly bad. It's very bad. Atheist men are alienating the people we want to work with us on the very same problems…that you cited in your comment."[186] After trying to clarify his argument:

The man in the elevator didn't physically touch her, didn't attempt to bar her way out of the elevator, didn't even use foul language at her […] [Rebecca] was probably offended to about the same extent as I am offended if a man gets into an elevator with me chewing gum.[187]

Watson herself issued the following boycott of Dawkins as a response to his posts:

[Richard Dawkins] will no longer be rewarded with my money, my praise, my attention. I will no longer recommend his books to others, buy them as presents, or buy them for my own library. I will not attend his lectures or recommend that others do the same.

The incident was labelled "Elevatorgate"[181]

Accusations of Islamophobia

Many have accused Dawkins of Islamophobia[188] However Dawkins has responded saying he is a frequent critic of Christianity and Islam does not get a 'free pass'. However he has also described Islam as more problematic than Christianity.[189] He as also maintained that he is critical of "the appalling misogyny and homophobia of Islam, I have criticised the murdering of apostates for no crime other than their disbelief"[190], he is only critical of these practices and beliefs and thus is far from attacking muslims.[190]

Dawkins generated controversy when he tweeted "All the world's Muslims have fewer Nobel Prizes than Trinity College, Cambridge. They did great things in the Middle Ages, though."[191] These comments generated controversy. Defending himself he went on to say:

"You can attack someone for his opinion. But for simply stating an intriguing fact? Who would guess that a single Cambridge College" and "Muslims aren't a race. What they have in common is a religion. Rather than Trinity, would you prefer the comparison with Jews? Google it."

Owen Jones commented, "How dare you dress your bigotry up as atheism. You are now beyond an embarrassment."[192] Critics have also hit out at comments he made on twitter saying

Of course you can have an opinion about Islam without having read Qur'an. You don't have to read Mein Kampf to have an opinion about Nazism." [193]

Dawkins has also stated that "Islam is the greatest force for evil in the world today"[194], generating further controversy and accusations of Islamophobia. He did however state that these comments were in reference to Islamism.[195] Other tweets occurred when at a debate at University College London when a Muslim speaker tried to segregate the sexes causing much controversy however Abby Ohlheiser writes in the Atlantic that 'Dawkins's response probably gained more attention than the incident itself: [193]

'Who the hell do these Muslims think they are? At UCL of all places, tried to segregate the sexes in debate between @LKrauss1 and a Muslim.' [196]and 'How has UCL come to this: cowardly capitulation to Muslims? Tried to segregate sexes in debate between @LKrauss1 and some Muslim or other.' [197]

His comments generated controversy, Dawkins mocked those who were calling him racist stating all he believe is that Muslims should not segregate the sexes.[198]

Dawkins also commented on the short film Fitna, saying "Geert Wilders, if it should turn out that you are a racist or a gratuitous stirrer and provocateur I withdraw my respect, but on the strength of Fitna alone I salute you as a man of courage, who has the balls to stand up to a monstrous enemy."[193]The film created an international uproar, many saying it made Islam out to be the same as Islamism[199].

Awards and recognition

Receiving the Deschner Prize in Frankfurt, 12 October 2007, from Karlheinz Deschner

Dawkins was awarded a Doctor of Science degree by the University of Oxford in 1989. He holds honorary doctorates in science from the University of Huddersfield, University of Westminster, Durham University,[200] the University of Hull, the University of Antwerp, the University of Oslo, the University of Aberdeen,[201] Open University, the Vrije Universiteit Brussel,[44] and the University of Valencia.[202] He also holds honorary doctorates of letters from the University of St Andrews and the Australian National University (HonLittD, 1996), and was elected Fellow of the Royal Society of Literature in 1997 and a Fellow of the Royal Society (FRS) in 2001.[1][44] He is one of the patrons of the Oxford University Scientific Society.

In 1987, Dawkins received a Royal Society of Literature award and a Los Angeles Times Literary Prize for his book The Blind Watchmaker. In the same year, he received a Sci. Tech Prize for Best Television Documentary Science Programme of the Year for his work on the BBC's Horizon episode The Blind Watchmaker.[44]

Other awards include the Zoological Society of London's Silver Medal (1989), the Finlay Innovation Award (1990), the Michael Faraday Award (1990), the Nakayama Prize (1994), the American Humanist Association's Humanist of the Year Award (1996), the fifth International Cosmos Prize (1997), the Kistler Prize (2001), the Medal of the Presidency of the Italian Republic (2001), the 2001 and 2012 Emperor Has No Clothes Award from the Freedom From Religion Foundation, the Bicentennial Kelvin Medal of The Royal Philosophical Society of Glasgow (2002),[44] and the Nierenberg Prize for Science in the Public Interest (2009).[203] He was awarded the Deschner Award, named after German anti-clerical author Karlheinz Deschner.[204] The Committee for Skeptical Inquiry (CSICOP) has awarded Dawkins their highest award In Praise of Reason (1992).[205]

Dawkins accepting the Services to Humanism award at the British Humanist Association Annual Conference in 2012

Dawkins topped Prospect magazine's 2004 list of the top 100 public British intellectuals, as decided by the readers, receiving twice as many votes as the runner-up.[206][207] He was shortlisted as a candidate in their 2008 follow-up poll.[208] In a poll held by Prospect in 2013, Dawkins was voted the world's top thinker based on 65 names chosen by a largely US and UK-based expert panel.[209]

In 2005, the Hamburg-based Alfred Toepfer Foundation awarded him its Shakespeare Prize in recognition of his "concise and accessible presentation of scientific knowledge". He won the Lewis Thomas Prize for Writing about Science for 2006, as well as the Galaxy British Book Awards's Author of the Year Award for 2007.[210] In the same year, he was listed by Time magazine as one of the 100 most influential people in the world in 2007,[211] and was ranked 20th in The Daily Telegraph's 2007 list of 100 greatest living geniuses.[212]

Since 2003, the Atheist Alliance International has awarded a prize during its annual conference, honouring an outstanding atheist whose work has done the most to raise public awareness of atheism during that year; it is known as the Richard Dawkins Award, in honour of Dawkins's own efforts.[213] In February 2010, Dawkins was named to the Freedom From Religion Foundation's Honorary Board of distinguished achievers.[214]

In 2012, ichthyologists in Sri Lanka honored Dawkins by creating Dawkinsia as a new genus name (members of this genus were formerly members of the genus Puntius). Explaining the reasoning behind the genus name, lead researcher Rohan Pethiyagoda was quoted as stating, "Richard Dawkins has, through his writings, helped us understand that the universe is far more beautiful and awe-inspiring than any religion has imagined [...]. We hope that Dawkinsia will serve as a reminder of the elegance and simplicity of evolution, the only rational explanation there is for the unimaginable diversity of life on Earth.[215]

Personal life

Dawkins has been married three times, and has one daughter. On 19 August 1967, Dawkins married fellow ethologist Marian Stamp in the Protestant church in Annestown, County Waterford, Ireland;[216] they divorced in 1984. On 1 June 1984, he married Eve Barham (1951–1999) in Oxford. They had a daughter, Juliet Emma Dawkins (born 1984, Oxford). Dawkins and Barham divorced.[217] In 1992, he married actress Lalla Ward[217] in Kensington and Chelsea, London. Dawkins met her through their mutual friend Douglas Adams,[218] who had worked with her on the BBC's Doctor Who. Dawkins and Ward separated in 2016 and they later described the separation as "entirely amicable".[219]

On 6 February 2016, Dawkins suffered a minor hemorrhagic stroke while at home.[220][221] Dawkins reported later that same year that he had almost completely recovered.[222][223]

Media

Selected publications

Documentary films

Other appearances

Dawkins has made many television appearances on news shows providing his political opinions and especially his views as an atheist. He has been interviewed on the radio, often as part of his book tours. He has debated many religious figures. He has made many university speaking appearances, again often in coordination with his book tours. As of 2016, he has over 60 credits in the Internet Movie Database where he appeared as himself.

Notes

a. ^ W. D. Hamilton influenced Dawkins and the influence can be seen throughout Dawkins's book The Selfish Gene.[48] They became friends at Oxford and following Hamilton's death in 2000, Dawkins wrote his obituary and organised a secular memorial service.[232]

b. ^ The debate ended with the motion "That the doctrine of creation is more valid than the theory of evolution" being defeated by 198 votes to 115.[233][234]

References

  1. ^ a b "Richard Dawkins". London: Royal Society. Retrieved 23 April 2016.
  2. ^ Dawkins, Richard (1986). The Blind Watchmaker. New York: W. W. Norton & Company. p. xvii. ISBN 978-0-393-31570-7.
  3. ^ Dawkins, Richard (2013). An Appetite for Wonder. New York, New York: Harper Collins. pp. 271–283, 287–294. ISBN 978-0-06-231580-9.
  4. ^ Grafen 2006, p. 67.
  5. ^ Grafen 2006, p. 3.
  6. ^ Grafen 2006, p. 14.
  7. ^ Grafen 2006, p. 27.
  8. ^ Grafen 2006, p. 50.
  9. ^ Grafen 2006, p. 66.
  10. ^ Grafen 2006, p. 101.
  11. ^ Grafen 2006, p. 125.
  12. ^ Grafen 2006, p. 130.
  13. ^ a b Grafen 2006, p. 191.
  14. ^ Grafen 2006, p. 203.
  15. ^ Grafen 2006, p. 213.
  16. ^ Grafen 2006, p. 227.
  17. ^ Grafen 2006, p. 236.
  18. ^ Grafen 2006, p. 243.
  19. ^ Grafen 2006, p. 248.
  20. ^ Grafen 2006, p. 255.
  21. ^ Grafen 2006, p. 265.
  22. ^ Grafen 2006, p. 270.
  23. ^ Taylor, James E. "The New Atheists". Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
  24. ^ a b Tortoise (2 December 2019). OMG – A ThinkIn with Richard Dawkins. YouTube. Event occurs at 2:08. Retrieved 31 January 2020.
  25. ^ Fahy, Declan (2015). The New Celebrity Scientists: Out of the Lab and into the Limelight. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
  26. ^ a b "Dawkins, Richard 1941– – Contemporary Authors, New Revision Series". Cengage Learning. Retrieved 16 May 2014. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |encyclopedia= ignored (help)
  27. ^ Dawkins, Richard. "My mother is 100 today. She & my late father gave me an idyllic childhood. Her writings on that time are quoted in An Appetite for Wonder". Twitter. Retrieved 26 November 2016.
  28. ^ Dawkins, Richard. "My beloved mother died today, a month short of her 103rd birthday. As a young wartime bride she was brave and adventurous. Her epic journey up Africa, illegally accompanying my father, is recounted in passages from her diary, reproduced in An Appetite for Wonder. Rest in Peace". Twitter. Retrieved 15 October 2019.
  29. ^ Burke's Landed Gentry 17th edition, ed. L. G. Pine, 1952, 'Dawkins of Over Norton' pedigree
  30. ^ a b Dawkins, Richard (11 December 2010). "Lives Remembered: John Dawkins". The Independent. London. Retrieved 12 December 2010.
  31. ^ Dawkins, Richard (October 2004). The Ancestor's Tale. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. p. 317. ISBN 978-0-618-00583-3.
  32. ^ Dawkins, Richard. "Brief Scientific Autobiography". Richard Dawkins Foundation. Archived from the original on 21 June 2010. Retrieved 17 July 2010.
  33. ^ Dawkins, Richard (15 March 2013). "Twitter profile where Dawkins mentions in his profile that he is English". Twiiter. Retrieved 20 January 2016.
  34. ^ Dawkins, Richard (5 October 2014). "Tweet to AndyKindler, where Dawkins mentions that he is English". Twitter. Retrieved 20 January 2016.
  35. ^ "A twitter status update by Dawkins saying that he identifies as English". Twitter.com. Retrieved 16 May 2014.
  36. ^ a b Anthony, Andrew (15 September 2013). "Richard Dawkins: 'I don't think I am strident or aggressive'". The Guardian. Retrieved 21 September 2014.
  37. ^ a b c d Hattenstone, Simon (10 February 2003). "Darwin's child". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 22 April 2008.
  38. ^ "Richard Dawkins: The foibles of faith". BBC News. 12 October 2001. Retrieved 13 March 2008.
  39. ^ Pollard, Nick (April 1995). "High Profile". Third Way. 18 (3): 15. ISSN 0309-3492.
  40. ^ "The Oundle Lecture Series". Oundle School. 2012b. Archived from the original on 30 April 2012. Retrieved 12 June 2012.
  41. ^ Dawkins 2015, p. 175.
  42. ^ Preston, John (17 December 2006). "Preaching to the converted". Daily Telegraph. ISSN 0307-1235. Retrieved 9 May 2019.
  43. ^ Dawkins, Richard (1966). Selective pecking in the domestic chick. bodleian.ox.ac.uk (DPhil thesis). University of Oxford. EThOS uk.bl.ethos.710826
  44. ^ a b c d e f g h Dawkins, Richard (1 January 2006). "Curriculum vitae" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 3 November 2012. Retrieved 13 March 2008.
  45. ^ Dawkins, Richard (1 January 2006). "Richard Dawkins: CV". Archived from the original on 23 April 2008. Retrieved 1 March 2007. For direct link to media, see this link
  46. ^ Schrage, Michael (July 1995). "Revolutionary Evolutionist". Wired. Retrieved 21 April 2008.
  47. ^ Dawkins, Richard (1969). "A threshold model of choice behaviour". Animal Behaviour. 17 (1): 120–133. doi:10.1016/0003-3472(69)90120-1.
  48. ^ a b c ""Belief" interview". BBC. 5 April 2004. Retrieved 8 April 2008.
  49. ^ Simonyi, Charles (15 May 1995). "Manifesto for the Simonyi Professorship". The University of Oxford. Archived from the original on 5 February 2016. Retrieved 13 March 2008.
  50. ^ "Aims of the Simonyi Professorship". 23 April 2008. Archived from the original on 6 February 2016. Retrieved 28 June 2011.
  51. ^ "Previous holders of The Simonyi Professorship". The University of Oxford. Archived from the original on 31 January 2016. Retrieved 23 September 2010.
  52. ^ "Emeritus, Honorary and Wykeham Fellows". New College, Oxford. 2 May 2008. Retrieved 20 January 2016.
  53. ^ "The Current Simonyi Professor: Richard Dawkins". The University of Oxford. Archived from the original on 11 March 2016. Retrieved 13 March 2008.
  54. ^ "Editorial Board". The Skeptics' Society. Retrieved 22 April 2008.
  55. ^ "The Dawkins Prize for Animal Conservation and Welfare". Balliol College, Oxford. 9 November 2007. Archived from the original on 12 September 2007. Retrieved 30 March 2008.
  56. ^ Beckford, Martin; Khan, Urmee (24 October 2008). "Harry Potter fails to cast spell over Professor Richard Dawkins". The Daily Telegraph. London. Retrieved 1 November 2008. {{cite news}}: Unknown parameter |lastauthoramp= ignored (|name-list-style= suggested) (help)
  57. ^ "New university to rival Oxbridge will charge £18,000 a year". Sunday Telegraph. 5 June 2011. Retrieved 20 January 2016.
  58. ^ Ridley, Mark (2007). Richard Dawkins: How a Scientist Changed the Way We Think : Reflections by Scientists, Writers, and Philosophers. Oxford University Press. p. 228. ISBN 978-0-19-921466-2.
  59. ^ Lloyd, Elisabeth Anne (1994). The structure and confirmation of evolutionary theory. Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-691-00046-6.
  60. ^ Dawkins, Richard (1978). "Replicator Selection and the Extended Phenotype". Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie. 47 (1): 61–76. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.1978.tb01823.x. PMID 696023.
  61. ^ "European Evolutionary Biologists Rally Behind Richard Dawkins's Extended Phenotype". Sciencedaily.com. 20 January 2009. Retrieved 28 June 2011.
  62. ^ Gould, Stephen Jay; Lewontin, Richard C. (1979). "The Spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian Paradigm: A Critique of the Adaptationist Programme". Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. B. 205 (1161): 581–98. Bibcode:1979RSPSB.205..581G. doi:10.1098/rspb.1979.0086. PMID 42062.
  63. ^ Dawkins, Richard (1999). The extended phenotype: the long reach of the gene (Revised with new afterword and further reading ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0192880512.
  64. ^ Dawkins 2006, p. 169–72. sfn error: multiple targets (5×): CITEREFDawkins2006 (help)
  65. ^ Hamilton, W.D. (1964). "The genetical evolution of social behaviour I and II". Journal of Theoretical Biology. 7 (1): 1–16, 17–52. doi:10.1016/0022-5193(64)90038-4. PMID 5875341.
  66. ^ Trivers, Robert (1971). "The evolution of reciprocal altruism". Quarterly Review of Biology. 46 (1): 35–57. doi:10.1086/406755.
  67. ^ Dawkins, Richard (1979). "Twelve Misunderstandings of Kin Selection" (PDF). Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie. 51: 184–200. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.1979.tb00682.x (inactive 20 May 2020). Archived from the original (PDF) on 29 May 2008.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of May 2020 (link)
  68. ^ Thorpe, Vanessa (24 June 2012). "Richard Dawkins in furious row with EO Wilson over theory of evolution. Book review sparks war of words between grand old man of biology and Oxford's most high-profile Darwinist". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 3 October 2012.
  69. ^ Dawkins, Richard (24 May 2012). "The Descent of Edward Wilson". Prospect. Retrieved 24 October 2015.
  70. ^ Williams, George Ronald (1996). The molecular biology of Gaia. Columbia University Press. p. 178. ISBN 978-0-231-10512-5. Extract of page 178
  71. ^ Schneider, Stephen Henry (2004). Scientists debate gaia: the next century. MIT Press. p. 72. ISBN 978-0-262-19498-3. Extract of p. 72
  72. ^ Dawkins, Richard (2000). Unweaving the Rainbow: Science, Delusion and the Appetite for Wonder. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. p. 223. Bibcode:1998ursd.book.....D. ISBN 978-0-618-05673-6. {{cite book}}: |journal= ignored (help) Extract of p. 223
  73. ^ Dover, Gabriel (2000). Dear Mr Darwin. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson. ISBN 978-0-7538-1127-6.
  74. ^ Williams, George C. (1966). Adaptation and Natural Selection. United States: Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-691-02615-2.
  75. ^ Mayr, Ernst (2000). What Evolution Is. Basic Books. ISBN 978-0-465-04426-9.
  76. ^ Midgley, Mary (1979). "Gene-Juggling". Philosophy. Vol. 54, no. 210. pp. 439–58. doi:10.1017/S0031819100063488. Retrieved 18 March 2008.
  77. ^ Dawkins, Richard (1981). "In Defence of Selfish Genes". Philosophy. Vol. 56. pp. 556–73. doi:10.1017/S0031819100050580. Retrieved 17 March 2008.
  78. ^ Midgley, Mary (2000). Science and Poetry. Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-27632-0.
  79. ^ Midgley, Mary (2010). The solitary self: Darwin and the selfish gene. McGill-Queen's University Press. ISBN 978-1-84465-253-2.
  80. ^ Brown, Andrew (1999). The Darwin Wars: How stupid genes became selfish genes. London: Simon and Schuster. ISBN 978-0-684-85144-0.
  81. ^ Brown, Andrew (2000). The Darwin Wars: The Scientific Battle for the Soul of Man. Touchstone. ISBN 978-0-684-85145-7.
  82. ^ Brockman, J. (1995). The Third Culture: Beyond the Scientific Revolution. New York: Simon & Schuster. ISBN 978-0-684-80359-3.
  83. ^ Sterelny, K. (2007). Dawkins vs. Gould: Survival of the Fittest. Cambridge, UK: Icon Books. ISBN 978-1-84046-780-2. Also ISBN 978-1-84046-780-2
  84. ^ Morris, Richard (2001). The Evolutionists. W. H. Freeman. ISBN 978-0-7167-4094-0.
  85. ^ Dawkins, Richard (24 January 1985). "Sociobiology: the debate continues". New Scientist. Archived from the original on 1 May 2008. Retrieved 3 April 2008.
  86. ^ Dennett, Daniel (1995). Darwin's Dangerous Idea. Vol. 2. United States: Simon & Schuster. pp. 32–36. Bibcode:1996Cmplx...2a..32M. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0526(199609/10)2:1<32::AID-CPLX8>3.0.CO;2-H. ISBN 978-0-684-80290-9. {{cite book}}: |journal= ignored (help)
  87. ^ Dawkins 1989, p. 11. sfn error: multiple targets (2×): CITEREFDawkins1989 (help)
  88. ^ Burman, J. T. (2012). "The misunderstanding of memes: Biography of an unscientific object, 1976–1999". Perspectives on Science. 20 (1): 75–104. doi:10.1162/POSC_a_00057.Open access icon
  89. ^ Kelly, Kevin (1994). Out of Control: The New Biology of Machines, Social Systems, and the Economic World. United States: Addison-Wesley. p. 360. ISBN 978-0-201-48340-6.
  90. ^ Shalizi, Cosma Rohilla. "Memes". Center for the Study of Complex Systems. University of Michigan. Retrieved 14 August 2009.
  91. ^ a b Laurent, John (1999). A Note on the Origin of 'Memes'/'Mnemes'. Vol. 3. pp. 14–19. Retrieved 17 March 2008. {{cite book}}: |work= ignored (help)
  92. ^ a b van Driem, George (2007). "Symbiosism, Symbiomism and the Leiden definition of the meme". Retrieved 6 November 2018.
  93. ^ Gleick, James (15 February 2011). The Information: A History, a Theory, a Flood. Pantheon. p. 269. ISBN 978-0-375-42372-7.
  94. ^ Dawkins, Richard. "Our Mission". Richard Dawkins Foundation. Archived from the original on 17 November 2006. Retrieved 17 November 2006.
  95. ^ Lesley, Alison (26 January 2016). "Richard Dawkins' Atheist Organization Merges with Center for Inquiry". WorldReligionNews.com. Retrieved 26 January 2016.
  96. ^ Sheahen, Laura (October 2005). "The Problem with God: Interview with Richard Dawkins (2)". Beliefnet.com. Retrieved 11 April 2008.
  97. ^ "Interview with Richard Dawkins". PBS. Retrieved 12 April 2008.
  98. ^ Van Biema, David (5 November 2006). "God vs. Science (3)". Time. Retrieved 3 April 2008.
  99. ^ Dawkins 2006, p. 50. sfn error: multiple targets (5×): CITEREFDawkins2006 (help)
  100. ^ Dawkins 2006, pp. 282–86. sfn error: multiple targets (5×): CITEREFDawkins2006 (help)
  101. ^ Dawkins, Richard (1 January 1997). "Is Science A Religion?". The Humanist. Archived from the original on 30 October 2012. Retrieved 31 December 2012.
  102. ^ Bingham, John (24 February 2012). "Richard Dawkins: I can't be sure God does not exist". The Telegraph. London. Retrieved 5 March 2016.
  103. ^ Lane, Christopher (2 February 2012). "Why Does Richard Dawkins Take Issue With Agnosticism?". Psychology Today. Retrieved 5 April 2016.
  104. ^ Knapton, Sarah. "Richard Dawkins: 'I am a secular Christian'". Telegraph. Retrieved 9 June 2014.
  105. ^ "Richard Dawkins hits back at allegations he is Islamophobic after Berkeley event is cancelled". 26 July 2017.
  106. ^ "Dawkins Twitter This is almost as impressive as the prescient knowledge that embryo starts as a blob, semen comes from the spine & the sun sets in a marsh".
  107. ^ ""Did Jesus exist?" Who cares? "Did Jesus lack a father? Raise Lazarus? Walk on water? Resurrect?" I care, and the answer is no in all cases".
  108. ^ "There are people who believe Jesus turned water into wine. How do they hold down a job in the 21st century?".
  109. ^ "Ridicule is the proper response to beliefs such as Jesus' mother was a virgin, Joshua slowed Earth's rotation or Muhammad split the moon".
  110. ^ "Over and above believing surreal nonsense about planets and magic stones, hats and underwear, Romney is also a liar".
  111. ^ "Could you really vote for a man who thinks the Garden of Eden was in Missouri?".
  112. ^ [105][106][107][108][109][110][111]
  113. ^ Powell, Michael (19 September 2011). "A Knack for Bashing Orthodoxy". The New York Times. Retrieved 31 December 2012.
  114. ^ Dawkins 2015, p. 173.
  115. ^ Hooper, Simon (9 November 2006). "The rise of the New Atheists". CNN. Retrieved 16 March 2010.
  116. ^ Dawkins 2006, p. 5. sfn error: multiple targets (5×): CITEREFDawkins2006 (help)
  117. ^ a b "Richard Dawkins on militant atheism". TED Conferences, LLC. February 2002. Retrieved 14 December 2011.
  118. ^ Dawkins, Richard (1 October 2013). "The Four Horsemen DVD". Richard Dawkins Foundation. Retrieved 13 April 2016. See also Video on YouTube
  119. ^ Smith, Alexandra (27 November 2006). "Dawkins campaigns to keep God out of classroom". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 15 January 2007.
  120. ^ a b c Dawkins, Richard (21 June 2003). "The future looks bright". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 13 March 2008.
  121. ^ Powell, Michael (19 September 2011). "A Knack for Bashing Orthodoxy". The New York Times. p. 4. Retrieved 20 September 2011.
  122. ^ Beckford, Martin (24 June 2010). "Richard Dawkins interested in setting up 'atheist free school'". Telegraph. London. Retrieved 29 July 2010.
  123. ^ Garner, Richard (29 July 2010). "Gove welcomes atheist schools – Education News, Education". The Independent. London. Retrieved 29 July 2010.
  124. ^ Ruse, Michael. "Creationism". Metaphysics Research Laboratory, Stanford University. Retrieved 9 September 2009. a Creationist is someone who believes in a god who is absolute creator of heaven and earth. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |encyclopedia= ignored (help)
  125. ^ Scott, Eugenie C (3 August 2009). "Creationism". Evolution vs. creationism: an introduction. Berkeley: University of California Press. p. 51. ISBN 978-0-520-26187-7. The term 'creationism' to many people connotes the theological doctrine of special creationism: that God created the universe essentially as we see it today, and that this universe has not changed appreciably since that creation event. Special creationism includes the idea that God created living things in their present forms...
  126. ^ Dawkins, Richard (9 March 2002). "A scientist's view". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 7 November 2009.
  127. ^ Catalano, John (1 August 1996). "Book: The Blind Watchmaker". The University of Oxford. Archived from the original on 15 April 2008. Retrieved 28 February 2008.
  128. ^ Dawkins 2003, p. 218. sfn error: multiple targets (4×): CITEREFDawkins2003 (help)
  129. ^ Moyers, Bill (3 December 2004). "Now with Bill Moyers". Public Broadcasting Service. Retrieved 29 January 2006.
  130. ^ Dawkins, Richard; Coyne, Jerry (1 September 2005). "One side can be wrong". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 21 December 2006. {{cite news}}: Unknown parameter |lastauthoramp= ignored (|name-list-style= suggested) (help)
  131. ^ Hall, Stephen S. (9 August 2005). "Darwin's Rottweiler". Discover magazine. Retrieved 22 March 2008.
  132. ^ McGrath, Alister (2007). Dawkins' God : genes, memes, and the meaning of life (Reprinted ed.). Malden, MA: Blackwell. p. i. ISBN 978-1405125383.
  133. ^ Swinford, Steven (19 November 2006). "Godless Dawkins challenges schools". The Times. London. Retrieved 3 April 2008.
  134. ^ Bass, Thomas A. (1994). Reinventing the future: Conversations with the World's Leading Scientists. Addison Wesley. p. 118. ISBN 978-0-201-62642-1. Extract of page 118
  135. ^ "Our Honorary Associates". National Secular Society. 2005. Retrieved 21 April 2007.
  136. ^ "The HSS Today". The Humanist Society of Scotland. 2007. Archived from the original on 18 April 2008. Retrieved 3 April 2008.
  137. ^ "Secular Coalition for America Advisory Board Biography". Secular.org. Retrieved 29 July 2010.
  138. ^ "The International Academy Of Humanism – Humanist Laureates". Council for Secular Humanism. Retrieved 7 April 2008.
  139. ^ "The Committee for Skeptical Inquiry – Fellows". The Committee for Skeptical Inquiry. Archived from the original on 15 June 2008. Retrieved 7 April 2008.
  140. ^ "Humanism and Its Aspirations  – Notable Signers". American Humanist Association. Archived from the original on 19 June 2010. Retrieved 9 February 2010.
  141. ^ Dawkins 2006, p. 3. sfn error: multiple targets (5×): CITEREFDawkins2006 (help)
  142. ^ Chittenden, Maurice; Waite, Roger (23 December 2007). "Dawkins to preach atheism to US". The Sunday Times. London. Archived from the original on 17 May 2008. Retrieved 1 April 2008.
  143. ^ Dawkins, Richard (30 July 2007). "The Out Campaign". Richard Dawkins Foundation. Archived from the original on 30 April 2008. Retrieved 1 April 2008.
  144. ^ "The Bus Campaign". British Humanist Association. Archived from the original on 20 February 2012. Retrieved 19 January 2009.
  145. ^ "BBC: The Selfish Green". Richard Dawkins Foundation. 2 April 2007. Archived from the original on 1 May 2008. Retrieved 22 April 2008. For video in one segment, see Video on YouTube
  146. ^ Dawkins 1989, p. 213. sfn error: multiple targets (2×): CITEREFDawkins1989 (help)
  147. ^ Cavalieri, Paola; Singer, Peter, eds. (1993). The Great Ape Project. United Kingdom: Fourth Estate. ISBN 978-0-312-11818-1.
  148. ^ "3 Quarks Daily 2010 Prize in Science: Richard Dawkins has picked the three winners". 1 June 2010. Retrieved 20 January 2016.
  149. ^ Dawkins, Richard (22 March 2003). "Bin Laden's victory". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 15 March 2008.
  150. ^ Dawkins, Richard (18 November 2003). "While we have your attention, Mr President..." The Guardian. London. Retrieved 16 March 2008.
  151. ^ Dawkins, Richard (19 November 2006). "From the Afterword". Herald Scotland. Retrieved 9 June 2014.
  152. ^ "Our supporters". Republic. 24 April 2010. Archived from the original on 26 March 2012. Retrieved 29 April 2010.
  153. ^ Dawkins, Richard (1989). "Endnotes. Chapter 1. Why are people?". The Selfish Gene (1st extra chapter) (2nd ed.). United Kingdom: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-286092-7.
  154. ^ "Political views of Richard Dawkins", Wikipedia, 8 May 2020, retrieved 27 May 2020
  155. ^ "Show your support – vote for the Liberal Democrats on May 6th". Libdems.org.uk. 3 May 2010. Archived from the original on 14 April 2010. Retrieved 29 July 2010.
  156. ^ Dawkins, Richard (9 July 1998). "Postmodernism Disrobed". Nature. 394 (6689): 141–43. Bibcode:1998Natur.394..141D. doi:10.1038/28089. For article with math symbols see this link.
  157. ^ "Overview". Campaign for a UN Parliamentary Assembly. Retrieved 9 October 2017.
  158. ^ Dawkins, Richard (16 December 2012). "Richard Dawkins". Twitter. Retrieved 3 May 2015.
  159. ^ Kutner, Jenny (8 December 2014). "Richard Dawkins: "Is There a Men's Rights Movement?"". Salon. Retrieved 1 February 2015.
  160. ^ Dawkins, Richard (1998). Unweaving The Rainbow. United Kingdom: Penguin. pp. 4–7. ISBN 978-0-618-05673-6.
  161. ^ Diamond, John (2001). Snake Oil and Other Preoccupations. United Kingdom: Vintage. ISBN 978-0-09-942833-6.
  162. ^ Dawkins 2003, p. 58. sfn error: multiple targets (4×): CITEREFDawkins2003 (help)
  163. ^ Harrison, David (5 August 2007). "New age therapies cause 'retreat from reason'". The Telegraph. London. Retrieved 25 March 2016.
  164. ^ Parker, Robin (27 January 2009). "C4 lines up Genius science series". Broadcast. Retrieved 31 January 2009. (subscription required)
  165. ^ Knapton, Sarah (4 December 2014). "Asteroids could wipe out humanity, warn Richard Dawkins and Brian Cox". The Telegraph. Retrieved 4 December 2014.
  166. ^ "British scientists really, really dislike Richard Dawkins, new study discover". The Independent. 31 October 2016. Retrieved 27 May 2020.
  167. ^ www.google.com https://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/why-richard-dawkins-is-no-scientist-the-survival-of-the-least-selfish-and-what-ants-can-tell-us-9849956.html. Retrieved 28 May 2020. {{cite web}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  168. ^ Johnston, Chris (7 November 2014). "Biological warfare flares up again between EO Wilson and Richard Dawkins". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 27 May 2020.
  169. ^ Reporter, Staff (21 May 2020). "New Templeton Prize winner criticises the 'scientism' of Dawkins". Catholic Herald. Retrieved 27 May 2020.
  170. ^ Doherty, Tim (2009). The Routledge Handbook of Contemporary Philosophy of Religion. New York: Routledge. pp. 52–53. ISBN 9781844658312.
  171. ^ "Ruse on belief net".{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  172. ^ Pigliucci, Massimo. New Atheism and the Scientistic Turn in the Atheism Movement. pp. 151–152.
  173. ^ "Scruton".{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  174. ^ Cite error: The named reference spectator.co.uk was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  175. ^ www.spectator.co.uk https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/richard-dawkins-and-the-ignorance-of-new-atheism-. Retrieved 28 May 2020. {{cite web}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)
  176. ^ Dawkins 2006. sfn error: multiple targets (5×): CITEREFDawkins2006 (help)
  177. ^ Dawkins, Richard (2006). "When Religion Steps on Science's Turf". Free Inquiry. Archived from the original on 19 April 2008. Retrieved 3 April 2008.
  178. ^ Dawkins, Richard. "How dare you call me a fundamentalist". Richard Dawkins Foundation. Archived from the original on 31 December 2012. Retrieved 28 December 2012.
  179. ^ "Atheism's shocking woman problem: What's behind the misogyny of Richard Dawkins and Sam Harris?". Salon. 3 October 2014. Retrieved 28 May 2020.
  180. ^ Amanda Marcotte. "Richard Dawkins explains a principle he himself refuses to adhere to". www.rawstory.com. Retrieved 28 May 2020.
  181. ^ a b "Atheists address sexism issues". USATODAY.COM. Retrieved 28 May 2020.
  182. ^ July 2, pharyngula on; 2011. "Always name names! | ScienceBlogs". scienceblogs.com. Retrieved 28 May 2020. {{cite web}}: |last2= has numeric name (help)CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  183. ^ "Dawkins, Watson and the elevator ride". The Mail & Guardian. 2 September 2011. Retrieved 28 May 2020.
  184. ^ a b "Sharing a lift with Richard Dawkins". www.newstatesman.com. Retrieved 28 May 2020.
  185. ^ Stern, Remy. "Richard Dawkins Torn Limb From Limb—By Atheists". Gawker. Retrieved 28 May 2020.
  186. ^ July 3, pharyngula on; 2011. "Oh, no, not again…once more unto the breach | ScienceBlogs". scienceblogs.com. Retrieved 28 May 2020. {{cite web}}: |last2= has numeric name (help)CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  187. ^ Dickson, Caitlin (6 July 2011). "Richard Dawkins Gets into a Comments War with Feminists". The Atlantic. Retrieved 28 May 2020.
  188. ^ Emilsen, William W. (1 August 2012). "The New Atheism and Islam". The Expository Times. 123 (11): 521–528. doi:10.1177/0014524612448737. ISSN 0014-5246.
  189. ^ N.B. "Dawkins: Islam is 'one of the great evils in the world'". Stellar House Publishing. Retrieved 28 May 2020.
  190. ^ a b "Richard Dawkins responds after being accused of Islamophobia". The Independent. 26 July 2017. Retrieved 28 May 2020.
  191. ^ "HuffPost is now a part of Verizon Media". consent.yahoo.com. Retrieved 28 May 2020.
  192. ^ Meikle, James (8 August 2013). "Richard Dawkins criticised for Twitter comment about Muslims". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 28 May 2020.
  193. ^ a b c Ohlheiser, Abby (8 August 2013). "A Short History of Richard Dawkins vs. The Internet". The Atlantic. Retrieved 28 May 2020.
  194. ^ "Richard Dawkins in US Islamophobia row". BBC News. 24 July 2017. Retrieved 28 May 2020.
  195. ^ "Richard Dawkins responds after being accused of Islamophobia". The Independent. 26 July 2017. Retrieved 28 May 2020.
  196. ^ Dawkins, Richard (9 March 2013). "Who the hell do these Muslims think they are? At UCL of all places, tried to segregate the sexes in debate between @LKrauss1 and a Muslim". @RichardDawkins. Retrieved 28 May 2020.
  197. ^ "Richard Dawkins (@RichardDawkins) | Twitter". twitter.com. Retrieved 28 May 2020.
  198. ^ Dawkins, Richard (9 March 2013). "I don't think Muslims should segregate sexes at University College London events. Oh NO, how very ISLAMOPHOBIC of me. How RACIST of me". @RichardDawkins. Retrieved 28 May 2020.
  199. ^ Eteraz, Ali (28 March 2008). "The Fitna farce". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 28 May 2020.
  200. ^ "Durham salutes science, Shakespeare and social inclusion". Durham University News. 26 August 2005. Retrieved 11 April 2006.
  201. ^ "Best-selling biologist and outspoken atheist among those honoured by University". University of Aberdeen. 1 September 2011. Archived from the original on 1 September 2011. Retrieved 1 January 2012.
  202. ^ "Richard Dawkins, doctor 'honoris causa' per la Universitat de València". University of Valencia. 31 March 2009. Archived from the original on 11 October 2011. Retrieved 2 April 2009. Note: web page is in Spanish.
  203. ^ Scripps Institution of Oceanography (7 April 2009). "Scripps Institution of Oceanography Honors Evolutionary Biologist, Richard Dawkins, in Public Ceremony and Lecture". Scripps Institution of Oceanography. Retrieved 7 April 2009.
  204. ^ Stiftung, Giordano Bruno (28 May 2007). "Deschner-Preis an Richard Dawkins". Humanistischer Pressedienst. Archived from the original on 19 July 2011. Retrieved 4 April 2008. Note: Web page in German.
  205. ^ "CSICOP's 1992 Awards". Skeptical Inquirer. 17 (3): 236. 1993.
  206. ^ "Q&A: Richard Dawkins". BBC News. 29 July 2004. Retrieved 9 March 2008.
  207. ^ Herman, David (2004). "Public Intellectuals Poll". Prospect. Retrieved 9 March 2008.
  208. ^ "The Top 100 Public Intellectuals". Prospect. Retrieved 22 April 2008.
  209. ^ Dugdale, John (25 April 2013). "Richard Dawkins named world's top thinker in poll". The Guardian. Retrieved 26 April 2013.
  210. ^ "Galaxy British Book Awards — Winners & Shortlists 2007". Publishing News. 2007. Archived from the original on 27 September 2007. Retrieved 21 April 2007.
  211. ^ Behe, Michael (3 May 2007). "Time Top 100". TIME. Retrieved 2 March 2008.
  212. ^ "Top 100 living geniuses". The Daily Telegraph. London. 28 October 2007. Retrieved 4 October 2010.
  213. ^ Slack, Gordy (30 April 2005). "The atheist". Salon. Archived from the original on 4 July 2007. Retrieved 3 August 2007.
  214. ^ "Honorary FFRF Board Announced". Freedom From Religion Foundation. Archived from the original on 17 December 2010. Retrieved 20 August 2008.
  215. ^ "Sri Lankans name new fish genus after atheist Dawkins". Google News. Agence France-Presse. 15 July 2012. Archived from the original on 21 May 2013. Retrieved 16 July 2012.
  216. ^ Richard Dawkins, An Appetite for Wonder – The Making of a Scientist, p. 201.
  217. ^ a b McKie, Robin (25 July 2004). "Doctor Zoo". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 17 March 2008.
  218. ^ Simpson, M.J. (2005). Hitchhiker: A Biography of Douglas Adams. Justin, Charles & Co. p. 129. ISBN 978-1-932112-35-1. Chapter 15, p. 129
  219. ^ "Richard Dawkins and Viscount of Bangor's sister Lalla Ward separate after 24 years". Belfast Telegraph. 17 July 2016. Retrieved 17 July 2016.
  220. ^ Dudding, Adam (12 February 2016). "Richard Dawkins suffers stroke, cancels New Zealand appearance". Fairfax New Zealand. Retrieved 12 February 2016.
  221. ^ Wahlquist, Calla (11 February 2016). "Richard Dawkins stroke forces delay of Australia and New Zealand tour". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 11 February 2016.
  222. ^ "Professor Dawkins on recovering from a mild stroke". Radio 4 Today. 24 May 2016. Retrieved 10 October 2016.
  223. ^ Dawkins, Richard (4 April 2016). "An April 4th Update from Richard". Richard Dawkins Foundation. Retrieved 5 April 2016. Audio file
  224. ^ Staff. "BBC Educational and Documentary: Blind Watchmaker". BBC. Archived from the original on 16 June 2007. Retrieved 2 December 2008.
  225. ^ Staff. "Sex, Death and the Meaning of Life". Channel 4. Retrieved 16 October 2012.
  226. ^ Mehta, Hemant (10 March 2013). "Richard Dawkins Appears in Ned Flanders' Nightmare on The Simpsons". Patheos. Retrieved 20 January 2016.
  227. ^ "Nightwish's Next Album To Feature Guest Appearance By British Professor Richard Dawkins". Blabbermouth.net. 16 October 2014. Retrieved 19 January 2015.
  228. ^ "Nightwish's Tuomas Holopainen Gives 'Endless Forms Most Beautiful' Track-By-Track Breakdown (Video)". 17 March 2015. Retrieved 20 January 2016.
  229. ^ Shutt, Dan (21 December 2015). "Nightwish, Wembley Arena, gig review: Closing with The Greatest Show on Earth too much for sell-out audience to handle". The Independent. Independent Print Limited. Retrieved 3 January 2016.
  230. ^ "Nightwish: track by track di "Endless Forms Most Beautiful"!". SpazioRock (in Italian). 17 March 2015. Retrieved 10 April 2015.
  231. ^ Schleutermann, Marcus (27 February 2015). "Nightwish - Food for Thought". EMP Rockinvasion (in English and German). Köln. Retrieved 10 March 2015.
  232. ^ Dawkins, Richard (3 October 2000). "Obituary by Richard Dawkins". The Independent. Archived from the original on 18 March 2008. Retrieved 22 March 2008.
  233. ^ Critical-Historical Perspective on the Argument about Evolution and Creation, John Durant, in "From Evolution to Creation: A European Perspective (Eds. Sven Anderson, Arthus Peacocke), Aarhus Univ. Press, Aarhus, Denmark
  234. ^ Dawkins, Richard (12 March 2007). "1986 Oxford Union Debate: Richard Dawkins, John Maynard Smith". Richard Dawkins Foundation. Archived from the original on 29 July 2012. Retrieved 10 May 2007. Debate no longer available at that website. For the debate audio in video format in two segments, see part 1 at Video on YouTube and part 2 at Video on YouTube

Cited texts