Jump to content

Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Motions

Edit links
Page semi-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia:Arbitration | Requests

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Miniapolis (talk | contribs) at 18:39, 21 April 2017 (→Voting (standardising): Enacting). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Arbitration Committee proceedings

Currently, there are no requests for arbitration.

[edit]
Open cases

Currently, no arbitration cases are open.

[edit]
Recently closed cases (Past cases)
Case name Closed
Yasuke 13 Nov 2024

Currently, no requests for clarification or amendment are open.

Motion name Date posted
Standardising arbitration enforcement procedures 21 April 2017

Motions

Standardising arbitration enforcement procedures

Arbitration enforcement and discretionary sanctions

The following sections are moved (word for word) from the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions procedure to the Committee's procedures page (under the "Enforcement" heading) and as such apply to all arbitration enforcement actions (including discretionary sanctions and actions enforcing arbitration case remedies):

A note is to be placed prominently on the discretionary sanctions procedure noting that the Enforcement provisions on the Committee's procedures page also apply to the application and enforcement of discretionary sanctions.

Appeals and modifications

The "Appeals and modifications" in the discretionary sanctions procedure is modified to reflect the current version standard provision for appeals and modifications, including changes made to it in future amendments (Template:Arbitration standard provisions may be used).

Voting (standardising)

For this motion there are 13 active arbitrators. With 0 arbitrators abstaining, 7 support or oppose votes are a majority.

Enacted - Miniapolis 18:39, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support
  1. Given that the only two comments are positive looks like we can get this done now. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:59, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Euryalus (talk) 11:05, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Doug Weller talk 16:29, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Mkdw talk 18:16, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Kirill Lokshin (talk) 14:45, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Newyorkbrad (talk) 16:07, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 05:18, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  8. GorillaWarfare (talk) 23:45, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  9. DGG ( talk ) 19:02, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Opabinia regalis (talk) 23:17, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 23:26, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose
Abstain

Discussion (standardising)

Seems sane to me. Thanks, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 13:14, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Standardizing things usually reduces confusion, so yeah, this sounds fine. Lord Roem ~ (talk) 22:54, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Motions&oldid=776554125"