Server/Client scenario degradation Versus "all-in-one?

[EricVee68]

Forgive my inquiry if this has already been discussed...
Does the overhead of implementing this server/client/web sockets scenario show degradation in overall "real-time" consumption/transcribe/translation/display performance compared to a solution that contains all functionality in one script base?
This solution is terrific, but for "single client" needs, is this overkill and potentially slower?

[zoq]

Hello, if you run everything locally the extra latency is negligible (maximum 10ms), most of the latency is consumed by the actual transcription process.