Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
234 lines (196 loc) · 6.93 KB

File metadata and controls

234 lines (196 loc) · 6.93 KB
title shortTitle description prev
Testing each layer
Testing
How to test an app that implements MVVM architecture.
title path
Dependency injection
/app-architecture/case-study/dependency-injection

Testing the UI layer

One way to determine whether your architecture is sound is considering how easy (or difficult) the application is to test. Because view models and views have well-defined inputs, their dependencies can easily be mocked or faked, and unit tests are easily written.

ViewModel unit tests

To test the UI logic of the view model, you should write unit tests that don't rely on Flutter libraries or testing frameworks.

Repositories are a view model's only dependencies (unless you're implementing use-cases), and writing mocks or fakes of the repository is the only setup you need to do. In this example test, a fake called FakeBookingRepository is used.

void main() {
  group('HomeViewModel tests', () {
    test('Load bookings', () {
      // HomeViewModel._load is called in the constructor of HomeViewModel.
      final viewModel = HomeViewModel(
        bookingRepository: FakeBookingRepository()
          ..createBooking(kBooking),
        userRepository: FakeUserRepository(),
      );

      expect(viewModel.bookings.isNotEmpty, true);
    });
  });
}

The FakeBookingRepository class implements BookingRepository. In the data layer section of this case-study, the BookingRepository class is explained thoroughly.

class FakeBookingRepository implements BookingRepository {
  List<Booking> bookings = List.empty(growable: true);

  @override
  Future<Result<void>> createBooking(Booking booking) async {
    bookings.add(booking);
    return Result.ok(null);
  }
  // ...
}

:::note If you're using this architecture with use-cases, these would similarly need to be faked. :::

View widget tests

Once you've written tests for your view model, you've already created the fakes you need to write widget tests as well. The following example shows how the HomeScreen widget tests are set up using the HomeViewModel and needed repositories:

void main() {
  group('HomeScreen tests', () {
    late HomeViewModel viewModel;
    late MockGoRouter goRouter;
    late FakeBookingRepository bookingRepository;

    setUp(() {
      bookingRepository = FakeBookingRepository()
        ..createBooking(kBooking);
      viewModel = HomeViewModel(
        bookingRepository: bookingRepository,
        userRepository: FakeUserRepository(),
      );
      goRouter = MockGoRouter();
      when(() => goRouter.push(any())).thenAnswer((_) => Future.value(null));
    });

    // ...
  });
}

This setup creates the two fake repositories needed, and passes them into a HomeViewModel object. This class doesn't need to be faked.

:::note The code also defines a MockGoRouter. The router is mocked using package:mocktail, and is outside the scope of this case-study. You can find general testing guidance in Flutter's testing documentation. :::

After the view model and its dependencies are defined, the Widget tree that will be tested needs to be created. In the tests for HomeScreen, a loadWidget method is defined.

void main() {
  group('HomeScreen tests', () {
    late HomeViewModel viewModel;
    late MockGoRouter goRouter;
    late FakeBookingRepository bookingRepository;

    setUp(
      // ...
    );

    void loadWidget(WidgetTester tester) async {
      await testApp(
        tester,
        ChangeNotifierProvider.value(
          value: FakeAuthRepository() as AuthRepository,
          child: Provider.value(
            value: FakeItineraryConfigRepository() as ItineraryConfigRepository,
            child: HomeScreen(viewModel: viewModel),
          ),
        ),
        goRouter: goRouter,
      );
    }

    // ...
  });
}

This method turns around and calls testApp, a generalized method used for all widget tests in the compass app. It looks like this:

void testApp(
  WidgetTester tester,
  Widget body, {
  GoRouter? goRouter,
}) async {
  tester.view.devicePixelRatio = 1.0;
  await tester.binding.setSurfaceSize(const Size(1200, 800));
  await mockNetworkImages(() async {
    await tester.pumpWidget(
      MaterialApp(
        localizationsDelegates: [
          GlobalWidgetsLocalizations.delegate,
          GlobalMaterialLocalizations.delegate,
          AppLocalizationDelegate(),
        ],
        theme: AppTheme.lightTheme,
        home: InheritedGoRouter(
          goRouter: goRouter ?? MockGoRouter(),
          child: Scaffold(
            body: body,
          ),
        ),
      ),
    );
  });
}

This function's only job is to create a widget tree that can be tested.

The loadWidget method passes in the unique parts of a widget tree for testing. In this case, that includes the HomeScreen and its view model, as well as some additional faked repositories that are higher in the widget tree.

The most important thing to take away is that view and view model tests only require mocking repositories if your architecture is sound.

Testing the data layer

Similar to the UI layer, the components of the data layer have well-defined inputs and outputs, making both sides fake-able. To write unit tests for any given repository, mock the services that it depends on. The following example shows a unit test for the BookingRepository.

void main() {
  group('BookingRepositoryRemote tests', () {
    late BookingRepository bookingRepository;
    late FakeApiClient fakeApiClient;

    setUp(() {
      fakeApiClient = FakeApiClient();
      bookingRepository = BookingRepositoryRemote(
        apiClient: fakeApiClient,
      );
    });

    test('should get booking', () async {
      final result = await bookingRepository.getBooking(0);
      final booking = result.asOk.value;
      expect(booking, kBooking);
    });
  });
}

To learn more about writing mocks and fakes, check out examples in the Compass App testing directory or read Flutter's testing documentation.

Feedback

As this section of the website is evolving, we welcome your feedback!