Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

RFE: Boot-strapping etcd cluster + operator #254

Closed
timothysc opened this issue Apr 24, 2017 · 8 comments
Closed

RFE: Boot-strapping etcd cluster + operator #254

timothysc opened this issue Apr 24, 2017 · 8 comments

Comments

@timothysc
Copy link
Member

FEATURE REQUEST

This is one of several changes I'm proposing regarding kubeadm support for HA and I will cross link with the draft-doc I'd like to share tomorrow, which highlights the details, right now this is a placeholder to be cross-linked.

Versions

All

/cc @kubernetes/sig-cluster-lifecycle-feature-requests

@xiang90
Copy link

xiang90 commented Apr 25, 2017

/cc @hongchaodeng

@justinsb
Copy link
Member

justinsb commented May 2, 2017

Tracking some issues here: coreos/tectonic-installer#257

@jamiehannaford
Copy link
Contributor

Unless someone else has claimed it, I'd like to work on this feature if that's okay

@timothysc
Copy link
Member Author

timothysc commented May 5, 2017

@jamiehannaford go for it. I'd be happy to help it along where I can.

The one constraint that is missing from the doc is we would like every

kubeadm init/(master join) to update the cluster vs some explicit migrate step that is listed in the doc.

@luxas
Copy link
Member

luxas commented May 29, 2017

@timothysc @jamiehannaford Is this tracking issue needed when we have #261?

@jamiehannaford
Copy link
Contributor

I think we can close this since it's covered by #261 and #277

@luxas
Copy link
Member

luxas commented Jun 1, 2017

Ok, thanks @jamiehannaford

@luxas luxas closed this as completed Jun 1, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants