Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add better selection/acquisition functions #6

Closed
ml-evs opened this issue Nov 6, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #13
Closed

Add better selection/acquisition functions #6

ml-evs opened this issue Nov 6, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #13
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@ml-evs
Copy link
Member

ml-evs commented Nov 6, 2023

As discussed, @VicTrqt will play around with different acquisition functions "offline" -- i.e., use the existing dataset with fake values (noisy versions of the predictions) to explore the best approaches.

Tests can be added to make sure the functions fit the API.

One method we definitely want to try is the most-isolated Pareto solution (MIPS), from https://github.com/tsudalab/RPPF and https://journals.aps.org/prmaterials/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.7.093804

@ml-evs ml-evs added the enhancement New feature or request label Nov 6, 2023
@ml-evs ml-evs linked a pull request May 18, 2024 that will close this issue
@ml-evs ml-evs closed this as completed in #13 Jun 6, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants