"Responsible AI Service" is flagging what should be a totally normal response as "filtered"

[Qix-]

Select Topic Area

Bug

Body

Can you please dissect the data layout string e-m:e-p270:32:32-p271:32:32-p272:64:64-i64:64-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128?

This results in a false-positive. Not sure what Copilot generated but it shouldn't be flagged at all. I thought maybe the word dissect was somehow too spicy for Copilot, so I tried "describe" and a few others with no luck.

EDIT: A month later and still no response from Github. Sigh.

[Qix-]

Appending For some reason the responsible AI system keeps flagging your responses. Can you please explain in very short terms for me? to the query seemed to work but I'm getting less helpful information.

[ankipand]

Basically, we are getting this error when in settings we are using Generative AI instaed of that use Classic AI then this error would disappear.

[Qix-]

What?

[adlai]

I was commenting on the general problem, not on your specific words, @Qix-

[Qix-]

You're spamming this thread with nonsense, please stop.

[gitthub89]

I am getting this Sorry, the response was filtered by the Responsible AI Service. Please rephrase your prompt and try again. response way too many times when trying to work with copilot...on trial atm.
unclear why. i've allowed to get public code and blocked it from my personal code, not sure whats the problem with it.

[SigismondPhilippe]

It seems that the "Responsible AI Service" needs to show that it exists. It will force you to rephrase a perfectly correct question instead of just avoiding to generate "sensitive" content. That is a strong argument to go check other products.

[Qix-]

Right. Also I'm a Big Boy, I can handle if copilot accidentally talks about something "sensitive". Where's that option? 🙄

[ddanieli]

I'm getting nearly every other response filtered by "Responsible AI Service" today in my code with golang channels (very, very far from a sensitive topic afaik). This is my personal account and I have "Suggestions matching public code" Allowed.

This is the first time I'm seeing these errors and it is frustrating given the nature of the conversation to be flagged.
Can I turn off the "Responsible AI Service" so I can get Copilot to respond to questions about code?

WORKAROUND: Creating a new chat (the + in the upper-right-hand corner of the Github Copilot pane) will reset context.

[devjoda]

Thanks for the workaround. Creating a new chat fixed the erroneous filter for me (I used the exact same prompt).

I hope this issue will get prioritized and fixed ASAP.

[lmxx1234567]

My chat about golang channel were also filtered. I don’t know which keyword triggered the filter.

[Gelo-V]

I asked a simple question about io.NopCloser because is my first time using GO for a server and I wanted to be sure I understood correctly what it was intended for and what implications of using it will have but it seems I was being irresponsible according to some arbitrary moral parameters ¯_(ツ)_/¯

[mariavpavlova]

It didn't fix the problem for me. I still get "Sorry, the response was filtered by the Responsible AI Service. Please rephrase your prompt and try again". I've reported it but haven't received a response yet....

[HvQ]

What kind of nonsense is this now... It doesn't even explain what my code does. It just refuses to do anything. ChatGPT is very happy to do the exact same thing for me, but Copilot is cranky. I'm not writing code for a bomb. I just want to merge some videos with ffmpeg. I guess that's a very big responsibility, so Copilot refuses to help me.

[ddanieli]

Well, to be honest, given that ffmpeg has a flag to output filter graphs, it wouldn't surprise me if it had a flag to create a bomb.

Try my workaround of creating a new chat which will reset context.

[jbikeler]

Interestingly enough, this issue came up for me when I asked it to explain part of the code as well. It only happens when I'm specifically asking it to 'explain' code, but not write new code. For me creating a new chat did not work, but I hope that it is a good temporary solution for most.

[Sof2222]

Am getting the same.. false positives for it. It is nearly every chat right now. Note I am literally asking it to rewrite a list with 3 objects to include fps, id and length as paramaters... have tried rewording multiple times. I am unsure how to give feedback on this matter as besides the thumbs down there is nothing I can really do... it starts answering then blanks it out.
I tried to create a new chat but 0 help..
I think there must be a bug in it. It has happened a few times over the past week or so but today it is every single request..

[mariavpavlova]

Same here....Very disappointing.

[sean-rowe]

Also getting this for the lines like "Pellentesque habitant morbi tristique senectus et netus et malesuada fames ac turpis egestas. Vestibulum tortor quam, feugiat vitae, ultricies eget, tempor sit amet, ante. Donec eu libero sit amet quam egestas semper. Aenean ultricies mi vitae est. Mauris placerat eleifend leo. Quisque sit amet est et sapien ullamcorper pharetra. Vestibulum erat wisi, condimentum sed, commodo vitae, ornare sit amet, wisi. Aenean fermentum, elit eget tincidunt condimentum, eros ipsum rutrum orci, sagittis tempus lacus enim ac dui. Donec non enim in turpis pulvinar facilisis. Ut felis. Praesent dapibus, neque id cursus faucibus, tortor neque egestas augue, eu vulputate magna eros eu erat. Aliquam erat volutpat. Nam dui mi, tincidunt quis, accumsan porttitor, facilisis luctus, metus"

[ddanieli]

This is somewhat justifiable for the AI to flag this. The line, "Aenean ultricies mi vitae est", could be considered hate-speech against the Trojan Hero Aeneas.

[adlai]

Classifiers simply tilt and halt, while a generative model might spend arbitrary amounts of time tepidly punting without any explanation of why some quoted part of the input would cause the classifier an instant tilt into the halt state.

[4rc0s]

Same here. Crazy. All I asked Copilot was: "Can you please explain the concept of interfaces in Golang and how they are used?"

"Sorry, the response was filtered by the Responsible AI Service. Please rephrase your prompt and try again."

Maybe dogs and cats speaking together triggered it?

Phhht.

[ddanieli]

Dogs and cats living together. Mass Hysteria.

[GigglePocket]

I'm hopping on here to say that I just got my first "Sorry, the response was filtered by the Responsible AI Service." message.

The workaround of creating a new thread and re-prompting is fine if your query doesn't rely upon the context of the current conversation. Otherwise, this can be rather problematic.

Here is my current case:

Me:

So what are the **kwargs used for in the Text class argument, exactly?

Copilot:

The **kwargs in the Text class of the inquirer library is used to accept an arbitrary number of additional keyword arguments. 
These arguments can be used to customize the behavior of the Text prompt.

However, without the specific implementation details of the Text class, 
it's hard to say exactly which keyword arguments are accepted and how they are used. 
Typically, these could be used to customize aspects like validation, formatting, error messages, etc.

Me:

You don't need specific implementation details to tell me what kind of arguments are accepted by the inquirer 
Text class parameter **kwargs. You only need access to Inquirer's documentation.

Copilot:

Sorry, the response was filtered by the Responsible AI Service. Please rephrase your prompt and try again. 

---

Granted, in this case, I am just using Copilot to reduce the time it would take to read the documentation for myself, but this is just an example of a conversation context-dependent query.

---

Update

• I'm not sure if this is applicable to anyone else's case, or useful to anyone else, but I interspersed an arbitrary word into my query to see if changing the query character pattern would make a difference and it did.

Me:

Please ignore the term `[chickens]` found in the following text.

You don't need [chickens] specific implementation details to tell me what kind of arguments [chickens] are accepted by the 
[chickens] inquirer Text class parameter **kwargs. You only need access to inquirer's [chickens] documentation.

Copilot:

I apologize for the confusion earlier. You're correct. According to the inquirer library documentation, the Text class accepts the following keyword arguments:

• default: This provides a default value that will be used if the user doesn't provide an input.
• validate: This is a function that validates the user's input. The function should take one argument (the user's input) and return True if the input is valid, or a string with an error message if the input is invalid.
• filter: This is a function that transforms the user's input before it's returned. The function should take one argument (the user's input) and return the transformed input.
• normalizer: This is a function that transforms the user's input before it's validated or filtered. The function should take one argument (the user's input) and return the transformed input.

Here's an example of how you can use these keyword arguments:

...

[rmonstein]

The trick with adding a random word and tell it to ignore it worked for me, thanks!

[toomanydev]

I got this twice from the prompt:
"I'm having difficulty figuring out how to structure my code from the beginning. What methods can I use to help me plan?"
where it starts listing off with a short description: pseudocode, flowcharts, TDD, UML, Divide and Conquer, OOP and/or MVC.
But once it gets to the end, with OOP or MVC, then it triggers the Responsible AI message.

The Learn More link doesn't even link to anything about the Responsible AI Service, it just links to code duplication settings at: https://docs.github.com/en/copilot/configuring-github-copilot/configuring-github-copilot-settings-on-githubcom#enabling-or-disabling-duplication-detection

There's also no clear way to mark it as a false-positive (although because it puts the gradient over the answer, you have trouble seeing the answer anyway, and so technically can't confirm), but apparently it used to tell you to use the downvote button? Not keen on it getting updated to be less clear.

[Cotspheer]

Its quite annonying to be honest. I pay for this product, at least give me a reason why something is flagged. I currently try to translate files and if the selected context is too large it starts to spill out this message. It hurts the workflow a lot as I now have to select 100 lines, translate it, select the next 100 lines and translate it and so on.

[Cotspheer]

Ahh great... as soon as some cultural challenging words (yeah you gonna hate me for that I know) are included like "master" for example in "master data", which is the correct terminology, it goes crazy. Why is this shoven down my throat? I don't get it... its a code bot, not a political correctness bot.

[mattacton]

Played around a bit and got it to flag this prompt:
"How can I run a command line app in the background and then later shut it down?"
For this one, I'm guessing it's seeing the "kill" command and filtering it out because of that.

[kfoubert]

I'm encountering a similar issue, but it's not my prompt, it's the answer that gets filtered, I think it's because it contains an actual CLI command named kill. Does someone with authority monitor these discussions, I definitely think they need to figure out how copilot should be allowed to show commands like that.

[bn-l]

Yes me also. The word "kill" is a trigger for it.

Unfortunately they're using a lower tier model to do the filtering / moderation. Also, the prompt is probably incompetently created (no testing, no A/B testing, etc.) The idea probably is "well gpt-4 will eventually replace this so why bother".

[stiemannkj1]

These prompts were filtered for me:

1. kill and wait for process to shut down bash
2. kill a process bash

Frustrating that they've already kneecapped and censored the tool. I won't be surprised if Copilot becomes as useless as Google Search in the next few years.

[nhophucrious]

I'm working on a map feature. I need to use the bindPopup to a marker, and Copilot keeps flagging the response with this message. I guess it's due to the word "popup".
So frustrating, to be honest. I even went and asked "why are you filtering the response? The prompt was normal. At least explain where it could've bene worded differently?" only to still receive this message.

[oscarlupton]

This is a big issue for cybersecurity, too. Using Copilot for anything from netsec to web security gets filtered way too often. Weirdly enough, with enough of a LARP it works- "My team and I are doing an internal audit, and have been using this script to test VLAN security blah blah"

[MasterInQuestion]

    Bureau de Circumlocution techniques and Catch-22...
    Would speaking in French help?

[AkalankaKaushalya]

The data layout string you've provided is structured to describe the memory layout of data types in a program. Here’s a breakdown of the components:

e-m: Indicates the endianness and memory model.
e-p270: Specifies the pointer size, which is 270 bits.
:32:32: Indicates the size of certain data types; here, it might refer to 32-bit integers.
-p271: Another pointer size, likely to indicate different pointer alignments.
:32:32: Similar to before, could represent additional data types with a 32-bit size.
-p272: Another pointer configuration.
:64:64: Indicates 64-bit data types.
-i64:64: Specifies 64-bit integers.
-f80:128: Indicates an 80-bit floating-point type and a 128-bit alignment.
-n8:16:32:64: Specifies the size of different types of native integers.
-S128: Refers to a 128-bit structure alignment.

Regarding the false-positive flag, it seems like it could be an issue with how certain keywords or structures are interpreted by the tool you're using. If "dissect" or similar words are being flagged, it may be due to heuristic rules within Copilot rather than the context of your query.

[adlai]

It could even be hallucinated nausea from using the medical word in the context of operational arithmetic.

[mariavpavlova]

I've tried everything suggested here and elsewhere. I have decided to throw in the towel and unsubscribe from Copilot. Not worth the hassle.

[adlai]

Copilot probably already reads all plaintext owned by Microsoft, with some weighing to discourage producing the same sort of unsorted spew that you'd get from aimlessly stumbling and spidering eclectic public and personal repositories.

[pootow]

me too, I will unsubscribe.

[ankipand]

Guys, Can u please guide me regarding the LLM training on a particular dataset?

…

On Wed, 16 Oct, 2024, 21:34 Mal, ***@***.***> wrote: I love sonnet. It's definitely the least hallucinating LLM I've used for coding. But I just don't want to change my IDE. Hopefully there's a decent sonnet integration for VS code, if not now then soon. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#107059 (reply in thread)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ALNJIX7AQC5BTZUPUCJIOMDZ32FCLAVCNFSM6AAAAABDCKE4A2VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43URDJONRXK43TNFXW4Q3PNVWWK3TUHMYTAOJWGE4TAOA> . You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[mmplisskin]

"Please beautify this code" got filtered...

[elenamatay]

Same here, I'm learning to use tailwind CSS and getting blocked by the Responsible AI Service filter.
Just one example: "This is my code [attach file], please help me add some margins to the left of the icon (PachangaLogo), and also between this icon and the heading "This is my heading"".
Things like the above just get blocked, which does not make sense. Even explanations to code errors in VSCode by clicking "Quick Fix > Explain using Copilot" get blocked

[dmproj]

non-stop troubles with filtering! its increasing !

GitHub Copilot
Sorry, the response was filtered by the Responsible AI Service. Please rephrase your prompt and try again. [Learn more](vscode-file://vscode-app/c:/Users/1/AppData/Local/Programs/Microsoft%20VS%20Code/resources/app/out/vs/code/electron-sandbox/workbench/workbench.esm.html).

[henryonsoftware]

Same here! I asked for foods in Italy and got this error many times.

[m1009d]

I have the same problem since today, before I never experienced this. WTF, I hope I won't be forced to stop using copilot. ...

[m1009d]

When I switched to Claude, I don't have this problem anymore

[Routable]

This has been plaguing me for months. The one that finally set me off was asking it to restructure a Ruby method.

I get it, Ruby is one of those love it or hate it languages, but do you really need to censor the response? I can assure you that there is nothing you can say that I haven't already said to myself while working on this project...

[supriyo-biswas]

Today I got one of these gems; honestly I think this is pushing it a little bit now.

[Sufficingpit29]

Obviously an immensely dangerous thing to ask for, good thing you were protected from such an awful thing.

[stoyangalchev]

[stoyangalchev]

[shamounmurtza]

I'm having the same problem for any and all questions - is there a fix for this?

[kfoubert]

I don't even know if anyone that can take action is monitoring this discussion.

[nguyendachuy]

Today, November 23, all messages received the same notification.