-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 274
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
With all these updates to the plugin, can we somehow auto-update? #106
Comments
Unfortunately it's not possible to replace the plugin file while KeePass is running. You can set the update-check-interval in chromeIPass from 3 days to 1 week or 1 month. But currently there are no more feature requests from users and no known bugs. |
I've been wanting to implement the KeePass version check feature, but On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Lukas Schulze [email protected]:
|
This feature is already implemented. |
Oh, well then, thanks for doing that, heh. Yeah, auto-update isn't necessary, IMO, there's been a spate of updates On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 3:30 PM, Lukas Schulze [email protected]:
|
I seem to be able to manually replace the PLGX while Keepass is running. It won't load the new version until restart, but still that is better than having to manually do it. That leads me to believe that the PLGX is loaded in once, and retained in memory (as there are no locks on the file itself)...could you not have an update routine that replaces the file, making it use the new version on restart of keepass? Similar to how Google Chrome updates, it replaces the files, but only loads them the next time you restart the browser. Or am I missing something? |
Old request but still valid. Understanding that plugins are only activated on next startup is perfectly reasonable since they can be replaced anyways while keepass is running. I see the value in an update downloader to keepass. |
Not that I don't appreciate all the hard work and new feature updates... =) ...but with all these updates every few days, can we somehow get an auto-update feature with it? =)
I guess this is a feature request more than an "issue" - sorry if it's posted in the wrong place.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: