You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It looks like applying PBCs on the difference between the current CV value and that of the wall might not be the correct thing to do. See this post for a practical example.
I think that the point is that a single upper/lower wall on a periodic CV is meaningless, anyway for u/l walls possible the correct thing is to calculate the distance as cv=getArgument(i)-at[I]; but also throw an error if the CV is periodic (in case suggesting to remove the periodicity using COMBINE)
It looks like applying PBCs on the difference between the current CV value and that of the wall might not be the correct thing to do. See this post for a practical example.
Should we just replace:
with
?
I am not totally sure this is the right thing to do. Maybe adding a
NOPBC
flag toUPPER_WALLS
andLOWER_WALLS
to disable PBC?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: