Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

The technical details of EMICA? #30

Open
weihaosky opened this issue Oct 30, 2024 · 7 comments
Open

The technical details of EMICA? #30

weihaosky opened this issue Oct 30, 2024 · 7 comments

Comments

@weihaosky
Copy link

Thanks for this excellent work!
In the readme, it says EMICA is a combination of DECA, EMOCA, SPECTRE, and MICA, but without any details.
May I ask how do you combine these methods to propose EMICA? Is there any documents (e.g., paper, technical report) introducing the EMICA?
Many thanks!

@radekd91
Copy link
Owner

In short, MICA's prediction for shape, another encoder that predicts camera and pose, and one more encoder that predicts the expression, that one is supervised with EMOCA's and SPECTRE's loss.

There is no paper or technical report. It's just a bit of engineering combining existing papers together. You can use it through the FaceReconstruction demos. If interested, you can step through the code.

@weihaosky
Copy link
Author

Thanks for explaining! Did you train the encoder that predicts the expression from scratch?

@stas-polukeev
Copy link

@radekd91 Hey, thanks for the answer!
I wanted to clarify: If emoca's speed is limited by the forward passes of CNN, it can be sped up to somewhat real-time. However, MICA is optimization based approach, which is fundamentally offline. Is EMICA offline or online in that regard?

@radekd91
Copy link
Owner

radekd91 commented Nov 28, 2024 via email

@stas-polukeev
Copy link

@radekd91 Okay, thank you for a swift response!
also is it compatible with FLAME2023 model or is it based on 2020?

@radekd91
Copy link
Owner

radekd91 commented Dec 6, 2024

If you downloaded all provided face reconstruction models, you should have a 2023 version in the assets. It's called EMICA-CVT_flame2023

@radekd91
Copy link
Owner

radekd91 commented Dec 6, 2024

Thanks for explaining! Did you train the encoder that predicts the expression from scratch?

Correct. All other encoders (expect for MICA) were trained from scratch.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants