We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Hi Xingyi,
Thanks for contributing such great code.
As we can see from the initial implementation of Hourglass-104, they use a pre-activation version of residual module and put BN and ReLU before Conv layer: https://github.com/princeton-vl/pose-hg-train/blob/master/src/models/layers/Residual.lua#L8
And in your version, it seems going back to the vanilla version where Conv layer followed by ReLU and BN: https://github.com/xingyizhou/CenterNet/blob/master/src/lib/models/networks/large_hourglass.py#L65
Besides, your Hourglass residual module has one less conv layer compared with the original implementation
Could you share some thoughts around this change? Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Hi Xingyi,
Thanks for contributing such great code.
As we can see from the initial implementation of Hourglass-104, they use a pre-activation version of residual module and put BN and ReLU before Conv layer:
https://github.com/princeton-vl/pose-hg-train/blob/master/src/models/layers/Residual.lua#L8
And in your version, it seems going back to the vanilla version where Conv layer followed by ReLU and BN:
https://github.com/xingyizhou/CenterNet/blob/master/src/lib/models/networks/large_hourglass.py#L65
Besides, your Hourglass residual module has one less conv layer compared with the original implementation
Could you share some thoughts around this change? Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: