World Enough and Time
- Episode aired Jun 24, 2017
- TV-PG
- 45m
IMDb RATING
9.1/10
6.4K
YOUR RATING
Trapped on a giant spaceship, caught in the event horizon of a black hole, he witnesses the death of someone he is pledged to protect. Are events already out of control?Trapped on a giant spaceship, caught in the event horizon of a black hole, he witnesses the death of someone he is pledged to protect. Are events already out of control?Trapped on a giant spaceship, caught in the event horizon of a black hole, he witnesses the death of someone he is pledged to protect. Are events already out of control?
Simon Carew
- Modern Cyberman
- (uncredited)
Helena Dennis
- Student
- (uncredited)
Richard Highgate
- Modern Cybermen
- (uncredited)
Jamie Hill
- Mondasian Cyberman
- (uncredited)
Kevin Hudson
- Cyberman
- (uncredited)
Steven Lathwell
- Cyberman
- (uncredited)
Richard Price
- Cyberman
- (uncredited)
Matthew Rohman
- Patient
- (uncredited)
Storyline
Did you know
- TriviaThe Master's line comparing Operation Exodus to being more like a "Genesis of the Cybermen" is a reference to "Genesis of the Daleks", which showed the Fourth Doctor being sent to the creation of the Daleks. Following the success of "Genesis of the Daleks", a story entitled "Genesis of the Cybermen" was planned, but never produced. It is also a play on Operation Exodus and the biblical books of Exodus and Genesis. Perhaps coincidentally, Doctor Who Magazine had previously published a trilogy of stories entitled Exodus/Revelation!/Genesis!, which also featured the Cybermen. Also, Genesis and Revelation (but not Exodus) have been used as titles in the '...of the Daleks' formula.
- GoofsWhen Bill arrives on floor 1056, it is shown that the time on floor 0 is 2 days, 10 hours, 45 minutes and 17 seconds. Later on, the time on floor 0 is shown to be 17 seconds earlier than when Bill arrived, despite time having evidently advanced on both floors.
- Quotes
The Master: Hello, Missy. I'm the Master. I'm very worried about my future. Give us a kiss.
- ConnectionsReferenced in Doctor Who: The Giggle (2023)
Featured review
Trailers are not for fans. They are meant to attract new viewers and to remind "sometimes viewers" that there's a new episode coming soon.
If you're a fan of a series - any series - hit the mute button and close your eyes for 20-30 seconds when a trailer for a future episode or season starts to play. If you're not a fan, and you watch the trailer, it may convince you to watch the show and it doesn't spoil many of the big reveals, shocks or plot twists because you're not familiar enough with the series to even understand most of them. But if you're a fan of the series, and you go ahead and watch the trailers - you've got nobody to blame but yourself for ruining the surprises. Complaining about it afterwards, or deducting a point from your review because YOU went ahead and allowed the surprises to be spoiled is kind of ridiculous.
It will be nice in a few years where all of the TV's are smart enough to know who's a fan of what and perhaps play trailers without any spoilers for "fans" of a series, or maybe swap out the trailer completely for "fans" and instead market a different series to you - one that you're not already a fan of - but for now, we don't have that and you all know what trailers are and how to avoid them - mute the audio and close your eyes.
It's not that hard. I do it all the time - and yes, I can see how a bit of foreknowledge could have diminished ones enjoyment of the latest episode - but, as I managed to avoid any foreknowledge - I greatly enjoyed this episode. I give it a 10 as I do most of Stephen Moffat's finales. There were a few bits of dialog I could have done without - but not enough to diminish my enjoyment of the episode.
There were a couple of reviewers that gave this episode a 4 rating and quoted some plot holes as one of the reasons for their low number. Seriously? Do these people realize that this was part 1 of 2? How can you complain about plot holes halfway through a story? Especially a Stephen Moffat story! He ties up all plot elements better than any other writer I know of. There's no way Moffat is going to give us a lame, unimaginative ending like Lost did. I hope that the 4's come back next week and upgrade their ratings after they see how deftly and cleverly Moffat wraps things up next week.
I can't say any more about the episode without spoiling something, so I'll let my 10 speak for itself and remind Who fans to NOT watch the trailers if they plan to watch the episode!!!
If you're a fan of a series - any series - hit the mute button and close your eyes for 20-30 seconds when a trailer for a future episode or season starts to play. If you're not a fan, and you watch the trailer, it may convince you to watch the show and it doesn't spoil many of the big reveals, shocks or plot twists because you're not familiar enough with the series to even understand most of them. But if you're a fan of the series, and you go ahead and watch the trailers - you've got nobody to blame but yourself for ruining the surprises. Complaining about it afterwards, or deducting a point from your review because YOU went ahead and allowed the surprises to be spoiled is kind of ridiculous.
It will be nice in a few years where all of the TV's are smart enough to know who's a fan of what and perhaps play trailers without any spoilers for "fans" of a series, or maybe swap out the trailer completely for "fans" and instead market a different series to you - one that you're not already a fan of - but for now, we don't have that and you all know what trailers are and how to avoid them - mute the audio and close your eyes.
It's not that hard. I do it all the time - and yes, I can see how a bit of foreknowledge could have diminished ones enjoyment of the latest episode - but, as I managed to avoid any foreknowledge - I greatly enjoyed this episode. I give it a 10 as I do most of Stephen Moffat's finales. There were a few bits of dialog I could have done without - but not enough to diminish my enjoyment of the episode.
There were a couple of reviewers that gave this episode a 4 rating and quoted some plot holes as one of the reasons for their low number. Seriously? Do these people realize that this was part 1 of 2? How can you complain about plot holes halfway through a story? Especially a Stephen Moffat story! He ties up all plot elements better than any other writer I know of. There's no way Moffat is going to give us a lame, unimaginative ending like Lost did. I hope that the 4's come back next week and upgrade their ratings after they see how deftly and cleverly Moffat wraps things up next week.
I can't say any more about the episode without spoiling something, so I'll let my 10 speak for itself and remind Who fans to NOT watch the trailers if they plan to watch the episode!!!
- tenly-98797
- Jun 24, 2017
- Permalink
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Official sites
- Language
- Filming locations
- Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, UK(All the flashback scenes at St Luke's University)
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
- Runtime45 minutes
- Color
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content