The
Concept
Attainment
Model
Riley
Jennings
2-2-16
EDC
311
Is
about
Students
developing
and
elaborating
concepts
and
developing
students
critical
thinking
skills.
Theory
and
Plan
Theory:
It
is
based
on
cognitive
learning
theory;
illustrates
the
scientific
method
Plan
Identify
Topics:
choose
a
topic
the
students
already
are
somewhat
familiar
with
and
then
go
d eeper
with
it
Specify
Learning
Objectives:
The
learning
objective
should
be
to
develop
and
elaborate
concepts
and
possibly
the
relationships
among
them,
for
a
concept
o r
set
of
concepts
the
students
are
already
superficially
familiar
with.
Examples
and
Non-Examples:
Select
examples
that
b est
illustrate
the
characteristics
of
the
concept,
tangible
examples
are
good.
Select
non-examples
that
highlight
the
differences
and
nuances
of
your
specific
concept.
Sequence
Examples
and
Non-
Examples:
Mix
up
the
examples
and
non-examples,
but
they
do
not
necessarily
have
to
alternate.
Start
with
less
obvious
examples
and
non-examples
to
challenge
and
excite
the
students
and
give
them
a
chance
to
get
wrong
h ypotheses
Implementing
Intro:
Explain
very
clearly
which
things
written
on
the
board
are
examples
and
n on-examples
and
that
means
the
examples
DO
illustrate
the
concept
and
the
non-examples
do
NOT
illustrate
the
concept,
and
its
the
s tudents
job
to
find
the
concept
Examples
and
Hypothesizing:
go
through
the
examples
and
non-
examples
and
get
s tudents
to
offer
h ypotheses
and
offer
guiding
questions
if
they
b ecome
frustrated
The
Analysis
Circle:
Evaluate
hypotheses
as
you
introduce
more
examples
and
n on-
examples,
keep
a
running
list
of
hypotheses
on
the
board
and
as
they
are
eliminated
one
b y
one
simply
cross
them
out.
Closure
and
Application:
when
students
isolate
one
h ypothesis
the
lesson
may
end
and
the
students
should
assign
specific
characteristics
to
the
concept,
coming
up
with
their
own
concrete
d efinition,
and
the
teacher
may
give
additional
examples
Assessment
and
Motivation
Assessment:
to
test
students
knowledge
and
understanding
of
a
concept
taught
using
this
m odel,
a
teacher
can
a sk
the
students
to
define
the
concept,
identify
the
concepts
characteristics,
relate
the
concept
to
other
concepts,
and
identify
or
supply
new
and
undiscussed
examples
of
the
concept.
You
can
also
test
their
critical
thinking
abilities
by
giving
them
a
list
of
examples
and
non-examples
that
have
two
possible
hypotheses,
a sking
for
those,
giving
another
examples
and
non-examples
and
eliminating
one
hypothesis
and
asking
for
a
student
narrative
of
all
of
that
Motivation:
this
m odel
lends
itself
to
group
work,
which
a
lot
of
students
find
motivating,
but
the
sheer
challenge
this
model
presents
is
usually
a
decent
m otivator
in
itself
Modifications
Younger
Students:
require
more
concrete
examples
and
its
better
to
use
more
positive
examples
rather
than
non-
examples
Culturally
Diverse
Students:
group
work
can
h elp
alleviate
self
consciousness
for
students
that
fear
b eing
mocked
for
a
wrong
answer
b ecause
of
cultural
d ifferences.
It
is
also
incredibly
important
for
the
teacher
to
foster
an
environment
of
respect
and
trust
so
that
no
answers
are
made
fun
of.
Concept
Attainment
II:
basically
the
same
but
emphasis
is
more
on
hypothesis
testing
and
critical
thinking,
all
examples
and
non-
examples
are
presented
a t
once
Concept
Attainment
III:
extends
hypothesis
testing
further;
students
provide
possible
hypotheses
but
then
also
must
provide
their
own
examples
and
non-examples
to
illustrate
suggested
hypothesis
So
What??
This
model
really
emphasizes
independent
student
thought
and
growth
and
students
ability
to
think
through
situations
and
make
connections.