Criteria

Description (Marks)

Present Position

If not available, Action

plan

CRITERION 1 - VISION, MISSION AND PROGRAM EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES (60)

1.1

1.2

1.3

State the Vision and Mission of

the Department and Institute (5)

State the Program Educational

Objectives (PEOs) (5)

Not Available at Institute

level

Not Available

Indicate where the Vision,

Mission and PEOs are
published and disseminated
among stakeholders (10)

Not Available

1.4

1.5

State the process for defining the

Vision and Mission of the
Department, and PEOs of the
program (25)
Establish consistency of PEOs
with Mission of the Department
(15)

Not Available

Not Available

Vision and Mission of the

Department and Institute
need to form in line with
Program Educational
Objectives (PEOs)
Program Educational
Objectives (PEOs) need to
form
Suitable process need to define
for publishing of Vision,
Mission and PEOs.
Stake holder need to identify
from Parents, Society, Industry
etc.
Committees like IQAC
(Internal Quality Assurance
Cell), Department Advisory
board; Programme Assessment
Committee etc. need to form
their meeting need to plan and
conducted.
Suitable process to defining
Vision and Mission of the
Department, and PEOs of the
program
Exercises to establish
consistency of PEOs with
Mission of the Department

CRITERION 2 Program Curriculum and Teaching Learning Processes

2.1

Program Curriculum (20)

Criteria

Description (Marks)

2.1.1

State the process used to identify

Present Position

extent of compliance of the

University curriculum for
attaining the Program Outcomes
and Program Specific Outcomes

Not Available

If not available, Action

plan
Suitable process need to define
to identify curricular gapslike software knowledge
required by industry and
which is not part of
University curriculum.

as mentioned in Annexure I.
Also mention the identified
curricular gaps, if any (10)
2.1.2

State the delivery details of the

content beyond the syllabus for

Not Available

the attainment of POs and

2.2
2.2.1

2.2.2

2.2.3
2.2.4

2.2.5

PSOs (10)
Teaching - Learning Processes
(100)
Describe Processes followed to
improve quality of Teaching &
Learning (25)

delivery details need to be

identify of the content
beyond the syllabus for the
attainment of POs and PSOs

Process to be improved to meet

NBA norms.

Quality of internal semester

Question papers, Assignments
and Evaluation (20)

Process to be improved for

Internal Exams and
assignments evaluations

Quality of student projects (25)

Process to be improved for

students project activities.

Initiatives related to industry

interaction (15)

Industry interaction needs to

be improved.

Initiatives related to industry

internship/summer training (15)

Industry internship/summer
training programs need to
plan and executed.

CRITERION 3 - Course Outcomes and Program Outcomes (120)

Criteria

Description (Marks)

3.1

Establish the correlation

between the courses and the
Program Outcomes (POs) and
Program Specific Outcomes
(PSOs) (20)

3.1.1

3.1.2

3.1.3

3.2

3.2.1

Present Position

Not Available

Course Outcomes (COs) (SAR

should include course outcomes
of one course from
each
semester of study, however, Not Available
should be prepared for all
courses and made available as
evidence, if asked) (05)
CO-PO matrices of courses
selected in 3.1.1 (six matrices to
be mentioned; one per semester Not Available
from 3rd to 8th semester) (05)
Program level Course-PO matrix
of all courses INCLUDING first
year courses (10)
Attainment of Course Outcomes
(50)
Describe the assessment
processes used to gather the
data upon which the evaluation

Not Available

Not Available

If not available, Action

plan
Formation of Program
Outcomes (POs) and
Program Specific Outcomes
(PSOs),
correlation between the
courses and the Program
Outcomes (POs) and
Program Specific Outcomes
(PSOs) need to establish
Course Outcomes (COs) need
to form

CO-PO matrices of courses

need to form

CO-PO matrices of courses

need to form

Evaluation process for

assessment of Course
outcomes.

of Course Outcome is based (10)

3.2.2

Record the attainment of

Course Outcomes of all courses

Not Available

with respect to set attainment

To set attainment levels and

evaluate attainment of
Course Outcomes of all
courses

levels (40)
3.3

Attainment of Program Outcomes

and Program Specific Outcomes
(50)

Criteria

Description (Marks)

3.3.1

Describe assessment tools and

Present Position

If not available, Action

plan

Not Available

Identify assessment tools and

define processes used for
measuring the attainment of
each of the Program
Outcomes and Program
Specific Outcomes

Not Available

Evaluate results of evaluation

of each PO & PSO

processes used for measuring

the attainment of each of the
Program Outcomes and Program
Specific Outcomes (10)
3.3.2

Provide results of evaluation of

each PO & PSO (40)

CRITERION 4 - Students Performance (150)

4.1
4.2
4.2.1

4.2.2
4.3
4.4
4.5
4.6
4.6.1
4.6.2

4.6.3

Enrolment Ratio (20)

Success Rate in the stipulated
period of the program (40)
Success rate without backlogs in
any Semester/year of study Without
Backlog means no compartment or
failures in any semester/year of
study (25)
Success r a t e i n s t i p u l a t e d
p e r i o d (actual duration of the
program)
Academic Performance in
Third Year (15)
Academic Perfor ma nce in
Sec ond Year (15)
Placement, Higher studies and
Entrepreneurship (40)
Professional Activities (20)
Professional societies / chapters
and organizing engineering events
(05)
Publication of technical magazines,
newsletters, etc. (05)
Participation in inter-institute
events by students of the program
of study (at other institutions) (10)

To enhance the activities

-

To enhance the activities

Publication of Technical
magazines, newsletter by
individual dept.
Encourage, guide students to
participate in inter-institute
events

CRITERION -5- FACULTY INFORMATION AND CONTRIBUTIONS (200)

5.1

Student-Faculty Ratio (SFR) (20)

Required 12 faculties for

maintaining Student Faculty
ratio 15:1(excluding faculty
serving for other dept.)

Criteria

Description (Marks)

5.2

Faculty Cadre Proportion

5.3

Faculty Qualification

5.4

Faculty Retention

5.5

Innovations by the Faculty in

Teaching and Learning

5.6

Faculty as participants in Faculty

development /training activities
/STTPs

5.7
5.7.1

Research and Development

Academic Research

5.7.2

Sponsored Research

5.7.3

Development Activities

5.7.4

Consultancy (From Industry)

5.8

Faculty Performance Appraisal and

Development System (FPADS)

Present Position

If not available, Action

plan
Faculties required
1 Professor,
2 Associate Professor
& 8 Assistant Professor
Expected max. faculty with
Ph.D. qualification.
Max. faculty expected to be
retained for 3 years from the
assessment year
Faculty contribution for
improved teaching learning.
Innovations in students
learning.
Provisions for availability of
this work on college website
for review and critics.

Faculty have to participate in

Faculty development /training
activities /STTPs
Min. 5 days programme is
expected.
Academic Research includes
research paper publications,
Ph.D. guidance, and faculty
receiving Ph.D. during the
assessment period.
Maximum funded research
Up to 20 Lacs/ year carries full
marks
Product Development,
Research laboratories,
Instructional materials,
Working models / charts /
monograms etc.
Revenue generated from
industry
A well-defined system for
faculty appraisal for all the
assessment years,
Its implementation and
effectiveness.

Criteria

Description (Marks)

Present Position

5.9

Visiting/Adjunct/Emeritus Faculty
etc.

If not available, Action

plan
Provision of inviting/having
visiting/adjunct/emeritus
faculty

CRITERION - 6- FACILITIES AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT (80)

6.1

Adequate and well

laboratories,
and
manpower

equipped
technical

6.2

Additional Facilities created for

improving the quality of learning
experience in Laboratories

6.3

Laboratories: Maintenance and

overall ambience

6.4

Project laboratory

6.5

Safety measures in laboratories

Adequate and well equipped

laboratories,
Max. utilization of laboratories
and manpower,
Additional facilities created for
the improved quality of
learning.
Effective use of facilities for
achieving the COs and POs.
Adequate maintenance for
laboratories,
Good ambience to enhance
teaching learning.
Project laboratory to improve
the quality of projects
undertaken by the Student and
staff.
Safety measures in laboratories
like First aid, Firefighting
equipments.

CRITERION 7 - CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT (50)

7.1
7.2
7.3
7.4

Actions taken based on the results

of evaluation of each of the POs
and PSOs
Academic Audit and actions taken
during the period of Assessment
Improvement in Placement, Higher
Studies and Entrepreneurship
Improvement in the quality of
students admitted to the program
CRITERION 8 - FIRST YEAR ACADEMICS (50)

8.1
8.2
8.3

First Year Student- Faculty Ratio

(FYSFR)
Qualification of Faculty Teaching
First Year Common Courses
First Year Academic Performance

20 Faculties required for 300

intakes
1/3 of faculties with Ph.D. and
rest of Post-graduation.

Criteria

Description (Marks)

8.4

Attainment of Course Outcomes of

first year courses
Describe the assessment processes
used to gather the data upon which
the evaluation of Course Outcomes
of first year is based

8.4.1

8.4.2
8.5
8.5.1
8.5.2

Present Position

If not available, Action

plan

Suitable process need to define

for assessment of COs and
POs.
data collection processes may
include specific exam
questions, laboratory tests,
internally developed
assessment exams, oral exams
assignments, presentations,
tutorial sheets etc.

Record the attainment of Course

Outcomes of all first year courses
Attainment of Program Outcomes
of all first year courses
Indicate results of evaluation of
each relevant PO/PSO
Actions taken based on the results
of e va l u a t i o n o f r e l e v a n t
POs / PSOs
CRITERION 9 - STUDENT SUPPORT SYSTEMS (50)

9.1

9.3

Mentoring system to help at

individual level
Feedback analysis and reward
/corrective measures taken, if any
Feedback on facilities

9.4

Self-Learning

9.5

Career Guidance, Training,

Placement

9.2

Mentoring system to be
developed for students
Feedback system from students
on Faculties.
Feedback should be collected
from students which elaborate
the quality of facilities like
Canteen, Hostel, library,
Transportation etc.
Need to enhance facilities,
materials for students selflearning.
Need to develop the facilities
for career guidance including
counseling for higher studies,
campus placement support,
industry interaction for
training/internship/placement,
etc.

Criteria

Description (Marks)

9.6

Entrepreneurship Cell

9.7

Co-curricular and Extra- Curricular

Activities

10.1
10.1.1

10.1.2

10.1.3

10.1.4

10.1.5

10.2

10.2
10.2.2
10.2.3

Present Position

If not available, Action

plan
Need to develop the facilities
for encouraging
entrepreneurship and
incubation
Need to develop the facilities
for co-curricular and extracurricular activities such as
NCC, NSS etc.

CRITERION 10 - GOVERNANCE, INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT AND FINANCIAL

RESOURCES (120)
Organization, Governance and
Available at Institute level
Transparency
State the Vision and Mission of the
Institute need to form in line
Institute
with Program Educational
Objectives (PEOs)
Governing body, administrative
Policies regarding the
setup, functions of various bodies,
Governing body, administrative
service rules procedures,
setup, functions of various
recruitment and promotional
bodies, service rules
policies.
procedures, recruitment and
promotion need to be
developed.
Decentralisation in working and
Policies regarding the
grievance redressal mechanism
Decentralisation in working
and grievance redressal
mechanism need to be
developed.
Policies regarding the
Delegation of financial powers
Delegation of financial powers
needs to be developed
Transparency and availability of
Information on policies, rules,
correct/unambiguous information
processes and dissemination of
in public domain
this information to stakeholders
is need to be made available on
the web site
Budget Allocation, Utilization, and
Provision of Budget
Public Accounting at Institute level
Allocation, Utilization, and
Public Accounting at Institute
level
Adequacy of Budget allocation
Utilization of allocated funds
Availability of the audited
statements on the institutes
website

Criteria

Description (Marks)

10.3

Program Specific Budget

Allocation, Utilization
Adequacy of budget allocation
Utilization of allocated funds
Library and Internet

10.3.1
10.3.2
10.4

10.4.1

Quality of learning resources

(hard/soft)

10.4.2

Internet

Present Position

If not available, Action

plan

Effective availability /
purchase records and
utilization of facilities /
equipment etc. to be
documented and demonstrated
available learning resources
including e-resources its
Accessibility to students and
Support to students for selflearning activities
Internet access in labs,
classrooms, library and offices
of all Departments and
adequate Internet Security
arrangements