0% found this document useful (0 votes)
116 views4 pages

Poisson Brackets and Constants of Motion

1) The Poisson brackets [x, px] and [Lx, Ly] are calculated. [x, px] = 1 and [Lx, Ly] = Lz. 2) The functions Tkl = pkpl + (mω)2qkql are shown to be constants of motion for the Hamiltonian of the 3D isotropic harmonic oscillator. 3) This is demonstrated by showing that the Poisson brackets [Tkl, H] are equal to 0 for all values of k and l.

Uploaded by

Uttar Pudasaini
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
116 views4 pages

Poisson Brackets and Constants of Motion

1) The Poisson brackets [x, px] and [Lx, Ly] are calculated. [x, px] = 1 and [Lx, Ly] = Lz. 2) The functions Tkl = pkpl + (mω)2qkql are shown to be constants of motion for the Hamiltonian of the 3D isotropic harmonic oscillator. 3) This is demonstrated by showing that the Poisson brackets [Tkl, H] are equal to 0 for all values of k and l.

Uploaded by

Uttar Pudasaini
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Seminar 11.

POISSON BRACKETS
Problem 43.
Calculate Poisson brackets [x, p
x
] and [L
x
, L
y
].
Solution
According to the general denition of the Poisson brackets,
[u, v] =

i
_
u
q
i
v
p
i

u
p
i
v
q
i
_
, (1)
we have
[x, p
x
] =

i
_
x
q
i
p
x
p
i

x
p
i
p
x
q
i
_
=
x
x
p
x
p
x
= 1. (2)
In the same way we can easily prove the rest of the general formulas given by Eqs.
(6.55)-(6.56) from the Lecture Notes:
[q
j
, q
k
] = [p
j
, p
k
] = 0; [q
j
, p
k
] = [p
j
, q
k
] =
jk
. (3)
Using these formulas we can calculate also the Poisson brackets for the angular
momenta, since by denition,
L = (r p) =

i j k
x y z
p
x
p
y
p
z

. (4)
It follows
_
_
_
L
x
= yp
z
zp
y
L
y
= zp
x
xp
z
L
z
= xp
y
yp
x
.
(5)
Hence
[L
x
, L
y
] = [yp
z
zp
y
, zp
x
xp
z
]
=
(yp
z
zp
y
)
x
(zp
x
xp
z
)
p
x
+
(yp
z
zp
y
)
y
(zp
x
xp
z
)
p
y
+
(yp
z
zp
y
)
z
(zp
x
xp
z
)
p
z

(yp
z
zp
y
)
p
x
(zp
x
xp
z
)
x
+
(yp
z
zp
y
)
p
y
(zp
x
xp
z
)
y
+
(yp
z
zp
y
)
p
z
(zp
x
xp
z
)
z
= p
y
(x) yp
x
= xp
y
yp
x
= L
z
. (6)
In the same way we can prove that
[L
y
, L
z
] = L
x
and [L
z
, L
x
] = L
y
. (7)
Problem 44
Take the Hamiltonian for the three-dimensional isotropic harmonic oscillator,
H =
1
2m
3

n=1
p
2
n
+
m
2
2
3

n=1
q
2
n
, (8)
and consider the functions
T
kl
= p
k
p
l
+ (m)
2
q
k
q
l
for k, l = 1, 2, 3. (9)
Show that these functions are the constants of motion for all k and l.
Solution
The equations of motion for the functions T
kl
in Poisson bracket formulation of
mechanics are
dT
kl
dt
= [T
kl
, H] +
T
kl
t
. (10)
Since T
kl
does not depend on time t explicitly, this equation is reduced to
dT
kl
dt
= [T
kl
, H]. (11)
Hence the functions T
kl
will be the constants of motion if the Poisson brackets for H
and T
kl
are zero. So let calculate
[H, T
kl
] =
_
(
1
2m
3

n=1
p
2
n
+
m
2
2
3

n=1
q
2
n
), p
k
p
l
+ (m)
2
q
k
q
l
_
=
1
2m

n
[p
n
p
n
, p
k
p
l
] +
m
2
2
(m)
2

n
[q
n
q
n
, q
k
q
l
]
+
(m)
2
2m

n
[p
n
p
n
, q
k
q
l
] +
m
2
2

n
[q
n
q
n
, p
k
p
l
]. (12)
Taking into account the general relations
_
[p
n
, p
k
] = [q
n
, q
k
] = 0
[q
n
, p
k
] = [p
n
, q
k
] =
nk
,
(13)
we immediately see that the rst two terms in Eq. (12) are equal to zero, while the
rest two terms require some additional calculations. For the third term, we have
[p
n
p
n
, q
k
q
l
] =

j
p
n
p
n
q
j
q
k
q
l
p
j

j
p
n
p
n
p
j
q
k
q
l
q
j
= [p
n
, q
k
q
l
]p
n
+ p
n
[p
n
, q
k
q
l
], (14)
since formally
p
n
p
n
q
j
=
p
n
q
j
p
n
+ p
n
p
n
q
j
(15)
and
p
n
p
n
p
j
=
p
n
p
j
p
n
+ p
n
p
n
p
j
. (16)
In the same way we can prove that
[p
n
, q
k
q
l
] = [p
n
, q
k
]q
l
+ q
k
[p
n
, q
l
], (17)
which by using Eq. (13) yields
[p
n
, q
k
q
l
] =
nk
q
l

nl
q
k
. (18)
Substituting these relations into Eq. (14) we nally obtain for the third term
[p
n
p
n
, q
k
q
l
] = (
nk
q
l

nl
q
k
)p
n
+p
n
(
nk
q
l

nl
q
k
) = q
l
p
k
q
k
p
l
p
k
q
l
p
l
q
k
. (19)
In an analogous way, we transform the fourth term in Eq. (12) as
[q
n
q
n
, p
k
p
l
] = [q
n
, p
k
p
l
]q
n
+ q
n
[q
n
, p
k
p
l
] = ([q
n
, p
k
]p
l
+ p
k
[q
n
, p
l
])q
n
+ q
n
([q
n
, p
k
]p
l
+ p
k
[q
n
, p
l
])
= (
nk
p
l
+
nl
p
k
)q
n
+ q
n
(
nk
p
l
+
nl
p
k
) = p
l
q
k
+ p
k
q
l
+ q
k
p
l
+ q
l
p
k
. (20)
From the comparison between (19) and (20), it follows
[p
n
p
n
, q
k
q
l
] = [q
n
q
n
, p
k
p
l
], (21)
which yields
[H, T
kl
] = 0, (22)
and hence the functions T
kl
are the constants of motion for all k and l, as required.
Next we obtain this result in a shorter way using some additional relations given
by Eqs. (6.54) in Lecture Notes,
_
[u, q
k
] =
u
p
k
[u, p
k
] =
u
q
k
.
(23)
Let u = H, then
_
[q
k
, H] =
H
p
k
[p
k
, H] =
H
q
k
.
(24)
In our case the Hamiltonian H is given by Eq. (8), and thus
_
H
p
k
=
p
k
m
H
q
k
= m
2
q
k
(25)
and Eqs. (24) become
_
[q
k
, H] =
p
k
m
[p
k
, H] = m
2
q
k
(26)
With the use of these relations, we have
[T
kl
, H] = [p
k
p
l
+ (m)
2
q
k
q
l
, H] = [p
k
, H]p
l
+ p
k
[p
l
, H] + (m)
2
([q
k
, H]q
l
+ q
k
[q
l
, H])
= m
2
(q
k
p
l
+ p
k
q
l
) + (m)
2
(
p
k
m
q
l
+ q
k
p
l
m
)
= m
2
(q
k
p
l
+ p
k
q
l
p
k
q
l
q
k
p
l
) = 0, (27)
as it should be.

You might also like