Special Functions
QUASI-LINEAR 1st ORDER ODEs
Complex Quasi-Linear 1st Order ODEs
General form:
w ( z ) + a ( z ) w ( z ) = f ( z )
on a domain D with IC w ( zo ) = wo
i.e:
linear in the unknown function w ( z ) and its derivative
with variable coefficient a ( z ) and forcing (or known) term f ( z )
The associated homogeneous (or reduced) equation is obtained by setting f ( z ) = 0 :
w ( z ) + a ( z ) w ( z ) = 0
Look for an integrating factor h ( z ) such that the homogeneous equation can be written as:
1
h
( hw ) = w + w = f
h
h
h
a = = ( ln h )
h
h ( z) = e
a ( ) d + c
a ( ) d
Hence, integrating:
h(z) w(z) =
h ( ) f ( ) d + c
with IC
h ( zo ) w ( zo ) =
h ( ) f ( ) d + c
zo
Therefore the most general solution of 1st order quasi-linear equations is:
h ( zo )
1 z
w(z) =
w ( zo ) +
h ( ) f ( ) d
h(z)
h ( z ) zo
with the second term equal to zero for homogeneous equations ( f = 0 ).
Luca dAgostino, 2015/16.
Special Functions
QUASI-LINEAR 2nd ORDER ODEs
Complex Quasi-Linear 2nd Order ODEs
General form:
w ( z ) + p ( z ) w ( z ) + q ( z ) w ( z ) = f ( z )
on a domain D
linear in the unknown function w ( z ) and its derivatives
with variable coefficients p ( z ) , q ( z ) and forcing (or known) term f ( z )
The associated homogeneous (or reduced) equation is obtained by setting f ( z ) = 0 :
w ( z ) + p ( z ) w ( z ) + q ( z ) w ( z ) = 0
A point zo in the closure of D is:
an ordinary point if p ( z ) and q ( z ) have at most a removable singularity at zo
a regular singular point if:
p ( z ) and q ( z ) have at most a pole of order 1 and 2 at zo , respectively
an irregular singular point in all other cases
Example:
w +
1
1
w
+
w=0
z2 z2 + 1
z z2 + 1
on the entire complex plane
z = 0 is a pole of order 2 for p ( z ) and 1 for q ( z ) z = 0 is an irregular singular point
z = i are regular singular points
z = i are simple poles for both p ( z ) and
Luca dAgostino, 2015/16.
Special Functions
QUASI-LINEAR 2nd ORDER ODEs
Linearly Independent Functions
Two functions f1 ( z ) and f2 ( z ) , defined and not identically zero on a domain D , are:
linearly dependent if for some constants c1 and c2 not both zero:
c1 f1 ( z ) + c2 f2 ( z ) = 0
identically on D
linearly independent otherwise
The Wronskian W ( z )
f (z)
W f1 f2 ( z ) = 1
f1( z )
of f1 ( z ) and f2 ( z ) , analytic on a domain D , is:
f2 ( z )
= f1 ( z ) f2 ( z ) f2 ( z ) f1( z )
f2 ( z )
Clearly:
f1 ( z ) , f2 ( z ) linearly dependent
W f1 f2 ( z ) = 0
(proportional columns of W f1 f2 )
Viceversa:
W f1 f2 ( z ) = f22 ( z )
d f1 ( z )
=0
dz f2 ( z )
Hence, finally:
W f1 f2 ( z ) = 0
f1 ( z ) f2 ( z )
f1 ( z ) , f2 ( z ) linearly dependent
(necessary and sufficient condition)
Luca dAgostino, 2015/16.
(linearly dependent)
Special Functions
QUASI-LINEAR 2nd ORDER ODEs
Properties of the Homogeneous Solutions
If w1 and w2 are two solutions of the associated homogeneous equation:
and
on D
w1 + pw1 + qw1 = 0
w2 + pw2 + qw2 = 0
Eliminating q by cross-multiplication by w1 and w2 and subtraction:
w1w2 w2 w1 + p ( w1w2 w2 w1 ) = 0 Ww1w2 + pWw1w2 = 0
where Ww1w2 ( z ) = w1w2 w2 w1 (Wronskian of w1 , w2 ), and integrating with Ww1w2 ( zo ) = Wo :
Ww1w2 ( z ) = Wo e
zz p ( ) d
o
Wo = 0 w1 , w2 linearly dependent
p d
since e
0
W
w
,
w
linearly
independent
1
2
o
Let w satisfy the homogeneous equation with homogeneous ICs:
with
w ( zo ) = 0 and w ( zo ) = 0
w + pw + qw = 0
Then, from this equation and its higher order derivatives:
w( k ) ( zo ) = 0 recursively for any order of differentiation k 2
and, by Taylor's expansion and the identity theorem:
w ( k ) ( zo )
w(z) =
( z zo )k = 0 for z zo < R
k!
k=0
w0
identically on D
Hence, for any two solutions wr and ws of the complete equation with the same ICs:
w = wr ws ; w ( zo ) = w ( zo ) = 0 wr ws on D (uniqueness of the solution)
Luca dAgostino, 2015/16.
Special Functions
QUASI-LINEAR 2nd ORDER ODEs
Particular Solutions by Variation of Parameters
Assume a particular solution wP of w + pw + qw = f in the form:
wP ( z ) = a1 ( z ) w1 ( z ) + a2 ( z ) w2 ( z )
where w1 , w2 are linearly independent solutions of w + pw + qw = 0 and:
w p = a1w1 + a2 w2 + a1w1 + a2 w2
w p = a1w1+ a2 w2 + a1w1 + a2 w2
Substituting in w + pw + qw = f obtain:
a1w1 + a2 w2 = 0
a1w1 + a2 w2 = 0
a1w1 + a2 w2 = f
which represents a linear system for the unknowns a1 and a2 whose solution is:
w f
wf
Ww1w2 = w1w2 w1w2 0
and
where
a1 = 2
a2 = 1
Ww1w2
Ww1w2
a1 ( w1+ pw1 + qw1 ) + a2 ( w2 + pw2 + qw2 ) + a1w1 + a2 w2 = f
Hence, integrating from zo to z on any simple curve in D :
z
z
w2 ( )
w1 ( )
and
a1 ( z ) =
f ( ) d
a2 ( z ) =
f ( ) d
zo W
z
o
w1 w2 ( )
w1 w2 ( )
and finally, substituting in the original expression of wP :
z
w ( ) w2 ( z ) w2 ( ) w1 ( z )
where
wP ( z ) = G ( z, ) f ( ) d
G ( z, ) = 1
zo
Ww1w2 ( )
Luca dAgostino, 2015/16.
(kernel)
Special Functions
QUASI-LINEAR 2nd ORDER ODEs
Complete Solution of the Non-Homogeneous IVP
From earlier results, the general solution of the Initial Value Problem (IVP):
w ( zo ) = wo
w ( z ) + p ( z ) w ( z ) + q ( z ) w ( z ) = f ( z )
with ICs
w ( zo ) = wo
is:
w ( z ) = c1w1 ( z ) + c2 w2 ( z ) + w p ( z )
with w1 , w2 linearly independent integrals of w + pw + qw = 0 and, from the ICs:
c1 , c2 solutions of:
c1w1 ( zo ) + c2 w2 ( zo ) + w p ( zo ) = wo
c1w1 ( zo ) + c2 w2 ( zo ) + wp ( zo ) = wo
The determinant of the coefficients of this system is:
Ww1w2 ( zo ) = w1 ( zo ) w2 ( zo ) w1 ( zo ) w2 ( zo ) 0
and therefore c1 , c2 are uniquely determined as:
wo w p ( zo ) w2 ( zo ) w2 ( zo ) wo wp ( zo )
c1 =
Ww1w2 ( zo )
c2 =
w1 ( zo ) wo wp ( zo ) wo w p ( zo ) w1 ( zo )
Luca dAgostino, 2015/16.
Ww1w2 ( zo )
for w1 , w2 linearly independent
Special Functions
QUASI-LINEAR 2nd ORDER ODEs
Power Series Solutions of the Homogeneous Equation (Frobenius Method)
Expand in Taylors series:
k 1
k
w
z
=
ka
z
=
k
+
1
a
z
(
)
(
)
k
k
+1
k =1
k=0
w ( z ) = ak z k
k=0
w ( z ) = k ( k + 1) a z k 1 = ( k + 1) ( k + 2 ) a z k
k +1
k+2
k =1
k=0
Using similar expansions for p ( z ) and q ( z ) for z < R (convergence radius):
k
k
k
k
p ( z ) = pk z
p ( z ) w ( z ) = pk z ( k + 1) ak +1z = ( n + 1) an +1 pk n z
k=0
k=0
k=0
k =0 n=0
k
q ( z ) = q z k
q ( z ) w ( z ) = q z k a z k =
an qk n z k
k
k
k
k=0
k=0
k=0
k =0 n=0
and, substituting in the homogeneous ODE:
w + pw + qw = 0 ( k + 1) ( k + 2 ) ak + 2 + ( n + 1) an +1 pk n + an qk n z k = 0
k=0
n=0
from which:
k
a0 w1 ( z ) for a1 = 0
1
ak + 2 =
n
+
1
a
p
+
a
q
w
z
=
(
)
(
)
n +1 k n
n kn
( k + 1) ( k + 2 )
n=0
a1w2 ( z ) for a0 = 0
Hence the most general solution of w + pw + qw = 0 is:
wh ( z ) = a0 w1 ( z ) + a1w2 ( z )
with a0 and a1 arbitrary constants
Luca dAgostino, 2015/16.
Special Functions
QUASI-LINEAR 2nd ORDER ODEs
The Euler Equation
Consider the Euler or equidimensional equation:
r
s
w + 0 w + 02 w = 0
z
z
where:
r0 z pole of O (1) and s0 z 2 pole of O ( 2 )
Assume:
w ( z ) = z = e Log z
where:
z 2 / 0
z = 0 is a regular singular point
with constant ( 1) + r0 + s0 z 2 = 0
2 + ( r0 1) + s0 = 0
(indicial equation)
whose solutions are:
1,2 =
1 r0
Hence:
1 2
(1 r0 )2 4s0
2
with
w ( z ) = c1z1 + c2 z 2
and, by direct substitution:
w ( z ) = c1z1 + c2 z1 Log z
1 = 2
Luca dAgostino, 2015/16.
1 2
1 = 2
if (1 r0 ) 4s0 0
2
if (1 r0 ) 4s0 = 0
2
Special Functions
IMPROPER INTEGRALS
Improper Integrals of Complex Functions
Let f ( z,t ) be a complex function:
defined for complex z in S and real t in [ a, ) (respectively [ a,b ) )
continuous in t on [ a, ) (respectively [ a,b ) ) for any z of S
The improper integral of the first (respectively second) kind of f ( z,t ) :
f ( z,t ) dt = lim f ( z,t ) dt = F ( z ) respectively
a
for T > ( , z )
f ( z,t ) dt F ( z ) <
a
T b
respectively
T b < ( , z )
is uniformly convergent if, in particular, = ( ) is independent on z
is absolutely convergent if:
f ( z,t ) dt = lim f ( z,t ) dt = F ( z )
is defined and converges to F ( z ) if for any > 0 there exists a ( , z ) such that:
T
f ( z,t ) dt <
respectively
f ( z,t ) dt <
b
Weierstrass M -criterion for convergence:
f ( z,t ) M ( t )
M ( t ) dt <
a
Luca dAgostino, 2015/16.
f ( z,t ) dt uniformly and absolutely convergent on S
a
Special Functions
IMPROPER INTEGRALS
Differentiation of Integrals
A complex function f ( z,t ) on D [ a,b ] is:
jointly continuous at zo ,t o of D [ a,b ] if for any > 0 there is a ( , zo ,t o ) such that:
f ( z,t ) f ( zo ,t o ) <
z zo + t t o < ( , zo ,t o )
whenever
If f ( z,t ) is jointly continuous on D [ a,b ] and analytic on D for any t of [ a,b ] then:
F (z) =
f ( z,t ) dt
b
is also analytic on D with derivatives:
k
b f ( z,t )
(k)
F (z) =
dt
for k = 1, 2,...
k
a
z
(differentiation under the integral sign)
The same result holds for improper integrals on infinite or finite (open) intervals ( a,b ) if:
the integrand f ( z,t ) is defined and jointly continuous on D ( a,b )
the integral is uniformly convergent on every bounded and closed subset of D
Examples:
Jn ( z) =
(z) =
cos ( nt z sin t ) dt
t z 1et dt
Luca dAgostino, 2015/16.
for Re z > 0
(Bessel functions of order n )
(Gamma function)
Special Functions
THE GAMMA FUNCTION
Definition, Convergence and Analyticity
Recall Eulers integral definition of the gamma function:
(z) =
t z 1et dt
and also
(z) =
t z 1et dt + t z 1et dt
1
where:
t z 1 = eln t
z1
x1
The integrand t z 1et :
is jointly continuous for any z and t > 0
for t > 1 satisfies the Weierstrass M -criterion for convergence:
t x t
z 1 t
t e = e t et M ( t ) on Re z
t
for 0 < t 1 , using Taylors expansion of et and the ratio test of uniform convergence:
e =
z 1 t
( 1)k t k + z 1
k=0
= e( x +iy1) ln t = e( x 1) ln t +iy ln t = eln t ei ln t = t x 1 cos ln t y + i sin ln t y
k!t k + z
k!t k + x
t
lim
=
lim
=
lim
=0
k ( k + 1)!t k + z 1
k ( k + 1)!t k + x 1
k k + 1
k!
Hence the series for t z 1et can be termwise integrated and:
(z) =
t
0
e dt + t
z 1 t
z 1 t
1)
(
dt =
+ t z 1et dt
1
k = 0 k!( k + z )
is uniformly convergent and analytic for all z 0, 1, 2,... , where it has simple poles
Luca dAgostino, 2015/16.
Special Functions
THE GAMMA FUNCTION
Properties of the Gamma Function
From the definition:
(z) =
t z 1et dt
(1) = et dt = et = 1
0
0
2
(1 2 ) = t 1 2 et dt = 2 eu du = 2
0
0
2 =
Integrating by parts:
( z + 1) =
t z et dt = t z et 0 + z t z 1et dt = z ( z )
0
and in particular, with z = 1 and it follows by induction:
( n + 1) = n!
for n = 0,1, 2... (1) = 1 = 0!
Besides:
( z ) (1 z ) =
t z 1et dt
z e d =
With the change of variables:
u
uv
and
t=
>0
=
>0
1+ v
1+ v
dt d t z 1 z et
0
( ,t ) u v
u
=
=
0
( u, v ) tu t v (1 + v )2
obtain by real integration in u and residue integration in v :
z 1
u
( z ) (1 z ) = e du
dv = 1
=
0
0 1+ v
sin z sin z
Luca dAgostino, 2015/16.
Special Functions
THE GAMMA FUNCTION
The Logarithmic Derivative of the Gamma Function
Define:
(z)
(logarithmic derivative of ( z ) )
(z)
By logarithmic differentiation of ( z + 1) = z ( z ) :
1
( z + 1) = ( z ) +
z
In particular, recursive use of this equation for integer values of z = k yields:
1
1
( k + 1) = +
+ ... + 1 + (1)
k k 1
where:
(1)
(Euler constant)
(1) =
= (1) = et Log t dt = = 0.57721566...
0
(1)
(z) =
Next, by logarithmic differentiation of:
( z ) (1 z ) =
sin z
obtain:
( z ) (1 z ) =
Luca dAgostino, 2015/16.
cos z
= cot z
sin z
Special Functions
BESSEL FUNCTIONS
Laplaces Equation in Cylindrical Coordinates
Laplaces equation in orthogonal cylindrical coordinates r , , z :
2u 1 u 1 2u 2u
2
u= 2 +
+
+
=0
r
r r r 2 2 z 2
Assume a separable solution of the form:
R
R
u = R ( r ) ( ) Z ( z ) R + + 2 Z + R Z = 0
r
r
Separating the terms that depend on z :
Z
1
R
= R + 2 = 2 = constant
Z
R
r r
since both terms are functions of different independent variables, and again:
r2
R
= R + 2 r 2 = 2 = constant
R
r
Hence the original 3D PDE problem for u is transformed in three ODEs for R , and Z :
R 2 2
Bessel equation for R ( r )
R +
+ 2R=0
r
r
+ 2 = 0
Z 2 Z = 0
Luca dAgostino, 2015/16.
harmonic equation for ( )
hyperbolic equation for Z ( z )
Special Functions
BESSEL FUNCTIONS
Bessel Functions of the 1st Kind
Introducing the transformation:
z = r
d
d
dr
dz
w ( z ) = R ( r )
in
the ODE for R ( r ) reduces to:
2
1
w + w + 1 2 w = 0
z
z
(Bessel equation)
(Bessel equation of order in standard form)
Using Frobenius method, the solutions of Bessels equation are:
k
2 k
1)
(
z
J ( z ) =
k = 0 k! ( k + 1) 2
R 2 2
R +
+ 2R=0
r
r
(Bessel functions of the 1st kind)
From the general expression of the Wronskisan WJ , J e p ( z ) dz and the properties of ( z ) :
zWJ , J ( z ) = ze dz z = A = lim zWJ , J ( z ) =
z0
2
2 sin
=
(1 + ) (1 )
Hence, for n = 0, 1, 2,... (integer):
WJ , J ( z ) 0 J ( z ) , J ( z ) linearly independent
Luca dAgostino, 2015/16.
Special Functions
BESSEL FUNCTIONS
Integral Representation
Using the Taylor expansions of the exponential function:
1 z ( 1) z
( 1) z
G ( z, ) = e
=e e =
=
2 k = 0 k! 2
m = 0 m!
m = 0 k = 0 m!k! 2
Eliminating m = n + k and using the definition of J n ( z ) :
z ( 1 ) 2
z
2
z
2
k
2k+n
1) z
(
n
G ( z, ) =
= J n ( z ) n
n = k = 0 ( k + n )!k! 2
n =
m+k
mk
(Laurents expansion of G )
Hence, for any simple contour C like = ei not through = 0 where G is singular:
Jn ( z) =
G ( z, )
1
1 z ( ei e i ) 2 i ( n +1) i
d
=
e
e
ie d
n +1
2 i
2 i
or, using the definition of sin :
1 i ( z sin n )
1
Jn ( z) =
e
d
=
2
2
cos ( z sin n ) + i sin ( z sin n ) d
and finally:
1
(integral representation of J n ( z ) )
cos ( z sin n ) d
0
since cos ( z sin n ) and sin ( z sin n ) are respectively even and odd functions
Jn ( z) =
Luca dAgostino, 2015/16.
Special Functions
BESSEL FUNCTIONS
Bessel Functions of the 2nd Kind
Define:
J ( z ) cos J ( z )
for n
sin
Y ( z ) =
Y ( z ) = lim Y ( z )
for = n
n
n
(Weber's Bessel function of the 2nd kind)
For = n , using l'Hpital rule:
1 J (z)
n J ( z )
Yn ( z ) =
( 1)
n
where, from the definitions of J ( z ) and the logarithmic derivative ( z ) of ( z ) :
J ( z )
( 1)
z
=
k = 0 k! ( k + 1) 2
k
2 k
Log
+
1
(
)
(log-singular at z = 0 )
Since J n ( z ) and Yn ( z ) are linearly independent by construction:
w ( z ) = c1 J ( z ) + c2Y ( z )
with c1 and c2 arbitrary constants
is the general solution of Bessel's equation of any order (integer or not)
Notice that, if the principal value z is considered, J ( z ) and Y ( z ) are:
analytic on the cut z -plane z > 0 , < < , for n 0 , entire for = n 0
Luca dAgostino, 2015/16.
Special Functions
BESSEL FUNCTIONS
Modified Bessel Functions
With the transformation = iz and w ( ) = w ( iz ) , from the Bessel equation obtain:
2
1
w* + w* 1 + 2 w* = 0
(modified Bessel equation of order )
Since the solutions J ( iz ) and Y ( iz ) fail to be real-valued when z = x > 0 , define:
(modified Bessel function of the 1st kind)
I ( z ) = ei 2 J ( iz )
K ( z ) = i ( 2 ) ei 2 J ( iz ) + iY ( iz )
(modified Bessel function of the 2nd kind)
Recalling the definitions of J ( z ) , Y ( z ) and using i 2 k i = ( 1) e Log i = ( 1) ei 2 :
k
2k
( 1)k
z
k! ( k + + 1) 2
k=0
J ( z ) cos J ( z )
=
z
J ( z ) =
2
Y ( z )
sin
1
z
I ( z ) =
k = 0 k! ( k + + 1) 2
K ( z ) =
2 k +
I ( z ) I ( z )
2 sin
Since I ( z ) and K ( z ) are linearly independent by construction:
w ( z ) = c1 I ( z ) + c2 K ( z )
with c1 and c2 arbitrary constants
is the general solution of the modified Bessel's equation of any order (integer or not)
Notice that, if the principal value z = e Log z is considered, I ( z ) and K ( z ) are:
analytic on the cut z -plane z > 0 , < < , for n 0 , entire for = n 0
Luca dAgostino, 2015/16.
Special Functions
BESSEL FUNCTIONS
Closed-Form and Asymptotic Representations
With the position w ( z ) = z 1 2u ( z ) :
2
2 1 4
1
w + w + 1 2 w = 0 u + 1
u=0
z
z
z 2
Hence for = 1 2 or z Bessel's equation reduces to the harmonic equation:
u + u = 0
and
J ( z )
A cos z + Bsin z
= z 1 2u
Y ( z )
z1 2
A rather elaborate analysis shows that for z :
2
cos z ( 2 + 1)
z
4
and for = 1 2 :
J ( z )
J1 2 ( z ) =
2
sin z
z
and
and
Y1 2 ( z ) =
Y ( z )
sin z ( 2 + 1)
z
4
2
cos z
z
Similarly, for the modified Bessel equation:
ez
I ( z )
= I1 2 ( z )
2 z
(independent on )
Luca dAgostino, 2015/16.
and
e z
K ( z )
= K1 2 ( z )
2z
z
for
= 1 2
Special Functions
BESSEL FUNCTIONS
Some Useful Properties
From the relevant series definitions:
B
z
+
B
z
=
2
B ( z )
(
)
(
)
1
+1
z
B 1 ( z ) B +1 ( z ) = 2 B ( z )
B ( z ) B ( z )
z
I 1 ( z ) I +1 ( z ) = 2 I ( z )
z
I 1 ( z ) + I +1 ( z ) = 2 I ( z )
I 1 ( z ) = I ( z )
K
z
K
z
=
2
K ( z )
(
)
(
)
1
+1
z
K 1 ( z ) + K +1 ( z ) = 2 K ( z )
K 1 ( z ) = K ( z ) K ( z )
z
and in particular for = 0 :
Z 0 ( z ) = Z1 ( z ) ;
I 0 ( z ) = I1 ( z )
B 1 ( z ) =
where B = J, Y
I ( z )
z
K 0 ( z ) = K1 ( z )
and
With the same procedure:
z B ( z ) = z B 1 ( z )
z K ( z ) = z K 1 ( z )
Luca dAgostino, 2015/16.
( B = J, Y , I )
z B ( z ) = z B +1 ( z )
z I ( z ) = z I +1 ( z )
( B = J, Y , K )
Special Functions
BESSEL FUNCTIONS
Transformed Equations and Solutions
The solution of Bessels equation:
2
1
w + w + 1 2 w = 0
z
z
is:
w ( z ) = c1 J ( z ) + c2Y ( z )
With the transformation:
d s
z=
and
u ( ) =
1 a
b
r
2
r
d s
w
s
the Bessel equation becomes:
1
1
u + a + 2b r u + 2 c + d 2 s b (1 a r ) r + b 2 2r u = 0
and its solution is:
u ( ) =
1 a
b
r
2
r
where:
1 1 a
=
c
s
2
2
Luca dAgostino, 2015/16.
c1 J s d s + c2Y s d s
Special Functions
LEGENDRE FUNCTIONS
Laplaces Equation in Spherical Coordinates
Laplaces equation in orthogonal spherical coordinates r , , :
1 2 u
1
u
1
2u
2
u= 2
sin + 2 2
=0
r
+
r sin 2
r r r r 2 sin
Assume a separable solution of the form:
r 2 R r
( sin ) R
u = R ( r ) ( ) ( )
+
R
+ 2 2 =0
r2
r 2 sin
r sin
Separating the terms that depend on :
( r R )r sin2 ( sin ) sin = m 2 constant
=
since both terms are functions of different independent variables, and again:
( r 2 R )r = m 2 ( sin ) = n ( n + 1) constant
R
sin 2
sin
2
Hence the original 3D PDE problem for u is transformed in three ODEs for R , , :
equidimensional equation for R
r 2 R + 2rR n ( n + 1) R = 0
+ cot + n ( n + 1) m 2 sin 2 = 0
Legendre-type equation for
+ m 2 = 0
harmonic equation for
Luca dAgostino, 2015/16.
Special Functions
LEGENDRE FUNCTIONS
Radial Equation
Recall:
r 2 R + 2rR n ( n + 1) R = 0
Assuming a solution in the form R = r obtain:
n
( + 1) n ( n + 1) = 0 (indicial equation) 1,2 =
1 n
and therefore:
Rn ( r ) = c1r n + c2 r 1 n
Azimuthal Equation
Recall:
+ m 2 = 0
Assuming a solution in the form = e obtain:
2 + m 2 = 0 (associated algebraic equation) = im
and therefore:
m ( ) = c1eim + c2 eim
( 2 m -periodic)
For physically meaningful (real periodic) solutions m = 0, 1, 2, ... integer
Luca dAgostino, 2015/16.
Special Functions
LEGENDRE FUNCTIONS
Legendre Equation and Polynomials
Recall:
m2
+ cot + n ( n + 1) 2 = 0
sin
With the transformation:
z = cos
w
z
=
(
)
(
)
( ) = w ( z ) sin
2
( ) = w ( z ) sin w ( z ) cos
the above equation reduces to the associated Legendre equation of degree n and order m :
m2
2
1 z w 2zw + n ( n + 1)
w=0
2
1
Using Frobenius method, a solution of the above equation with n = 0, 1, 2, ... and m = 0 is:
n
1 dn 2
Pn ( z ) = n
z
1
(Rodrigues formula for Legendre polynomials Pn ( z ) )
2 n! dz n
Some relevant properties:
1
2
2
P
x
dx
=
(
)
1 n
2n + 1
( n + 1) Pn +1 ( z ) = ( 2n + 1) zPn ( z ) nPn 1 ( z )
Luca dAgostino, 2015/16.
(norm)
(recursive relation)
Special Functions
LEGENDRE FUNCTIONS
Associated Legendre Equation
Recall:
m2
1 z w 2zw + n ( n + 1)
w=0
2
1
The general solution of this equation for n = 0, 1, 2, ... , m = 0 and z = x real is:
w ( x ) = c1Pn ( x ) + c2Qn ( x )
for x < 1
where Qn ( x ) is the Legendre function of second kind of order n :
n
1 dn 2
1+ x 1
1+ x
Qn ( x ) = n
x
1
log
P
x
log
for x < 1
(
)
n
2 n! dx n
1 x 2
1 x
The solution for z complex is obtained by analytic continuation on the z -plane:
w ( z ) = c1Pn ( z ) + c2Qn ( z )
for any z
by properly choosing the logarithmic branch cuts Qn ( z ) = Qn ( x ) on 1 < x < 1
Finally, it can readily be shown by direct substitution that:
m
m
m2 d
m2 d
2
2
w ( z ) = c1 z 1
Pn ( z ) + c2 z 1
Qn ( z )
dz m
dz m
is the general solution of the associated Legendre equation with n = 0, 1, 2, ... and m 0
Luca dAgostino, 2015/16.
Special Functions
BOUNDARY VALUE PROBLEMS
2nd Order Sturn-Liouville BVPs
A linear homogeneous ODE for y ( x ) on ( x1 , x2 ) :
y + py + ( q + r ) y = 0 y ( x ) = A ( x, ) + B ( x, )
with:
real coefficients p ( x ) , q ( x ) and r ( x )
constant free parameter (yet undetermined)
and either type of BCs at x = xi = x1 , x2 :
with ai , bi constants, not both zero
ai y ( xi ) + bi y ( xi ) = 0
y ( x1 ) = y ( x2 )
and
y ( x1 ) = y ( x2 )
(general solution)
(homogeneous BCs)
(periodic BCs)
Then, since either type of BCs is linear and homogeneous in A and B :
Ac11 ( ) + Bc12 ( ) = 0
A = B = 0 y ( x ) = 0 (trivial solution)
Ac21 ( ) + Bc22 ( ) = 0
except for values of such that:
cij ( ) = c11 ( ) c22 ( ) c12 ( ) c21 ( ) = 0 = h , h = 1, 2, 3, ... (eigenvalues)
Then the equations for A and B are lineraly dependent and, using for instance the 1st one:
c ( )
(eigenfunctions)
B = A 11
yh ( x ) c12 ( h ) ( x, h ) c11 ( h ) ( x, h )
c12 ( )
Notice that the eigenfunctions yh ( x ) are only determined to within a multiplicative factor
Luca dAgostino, 2015/16.
Special Functions
BOUNDARY VALUE PROBLEMS
Orthogonality of the Eigenfunctions
Consider a Sturm-Liouville BVP on ( x1 , x2 ) for the ODE:
ai y ( xi ) + bi y ( xi ) = 0 at x = xi = x1 , x2
y + py + ( q + r ) y = 0
with either of
y ( x1 ) = y ( x2 ) and y ( x1 ) = y ( x2 )
With the transformations:
p ( x ) dx
;
v ( x ) = qu
and
w ( x ) = ru
(all real)
u ( x ) = e
the above ODE becomes:
(uy ) + ( v + w ) y = 0
For any two eigenvalues h , k and eigenfunctions yh ( x ) , yk ( x ) , by complex conjugation:
(uyh ) + vyh = h wyh and (uyk ) + vyk = k wyk
By cross-multiplication by yk and yh , subtraction to eliminate v , and integration by parts:
h k
x2
x1
x2
x2
x2
wyh yk dx = yh ( uyk ) dx yk ( uyh ) dx = yh ( uyk ) yk ( uyh ) x
x1
x1
Then, using the BCs (either homogeneous or periodic) at x = x1 , x2 :
x1
x2
=
u
y
y
y
y
(
)
h k
k h x = 0 (orthogonality relations)
x2
2
1
h = k i2 Im {h } yh w dx =
x1
Hence, distinct eigenfunctions are orthogonal on ( x1 , x2 ) w.r.t. the weight function w ( x )
hk
h k
Luca dAgostino, 2015/16.
x2
wyh yk dx =
Special Functions
BOUNDARY VALUE PROBLEMS
Proper 2nd Order Sturn-Liouville BVPs
A Sturm-Liouville BVP for ( uy ) + ( v + w ) y = 0 on ( x1 , x2 ) is proper if:
u > 0;
v0
w > 0 on ( x1 , x2 )
and
b1 a1 < 0 at x = x1 and
b2 a 2 > 0 at x = x2
Then, from the orthogonality relation with h = k :
h h
x2
x1
yh yh w dx = i2 Im {h }
x2
x1
yh w dx = 0 h real yh ( x ) real
2
Also, if yh ( x ) , yk ( x ) have equal eigenvalues h = k , integrating and using the BCs:
yh ( uyk ) yk ( uyh ) = ( h k ) yh yk w = 0 u ( yh yk yk yh ) = u ( yh yk yk yh ) x = 0
i
Hence:
yh ( x ) and yk ( x ) are linearly dependent
the linearly independent eigenfunction corresponding to each eigenvalue is unique
Finally, multiplying the equation ( uyh ) + vyh = wh yh by yh and integrating:
h yh yh w dx = [ uyh yh ]x2 + uyh yh dx + ( v ) yh yh dx > 0 h 0
1
x1
x1
x1
x2
>0
and, in particular:
if and only if
h = 0
Luca dAgostino, 2015/16.
x2
x2
yh constant and v = 0 identically on ( x1 , x2 )
Special Functions
BOUNDARY VALUE PROBLEMS
The BVP for the Harmonic Equation with Periodic BCs
Consider the Sturm-Liouville problem for:
y + 2 y = 0
on x1 x x2
with
y ( x1 ) = y ( x2 )
y ( x1 ) = y ( x2 )
Writing the harmonic equation as:
u = 1, v = 0, w = 1 (proper BVP) h = h2 0 h real
2
( y ) + wy = 0
y ( x ) = A cos x + Bsin x
Then, from the BCs:
A
a1 cos x1 b1 sin x1 a1 cos x1 b1 sin x1 A
=
c
a cos x b sin x a sin x + b cos x B ij ( ) B = 0
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
cij ( ) = 0 h2 with h = 1, 2, 3, ...
yh ( x ) = ( sin h x1 sin h x2 ) cos h x ( cos h x1 cos h x2 ) sin h x
Besides:
x2
x1
yh ( x ) yk ( x ) dx = 0
for h k
by the orthogonality relations, and for h = k can be computed using:
cos 2 h x
cos 2 h x
1
sin 2 h x
sin 2 h x dx = 2 x 4 h + c and sin h x cos h x dx = 2 h + c
Luca dAgostino, 2015/16.
Special Functions
BOUNDARY VALUE PROBLEMS
The BVP for the Harmonic Equation with Homogeneous BCs
Consider the Sturm-Liouville problem for:
y + 2 y = 0
on x1 x x2
with
a1 y ( x1 ) + b1 y ( x1 ) = 0
a2 y ( x2 ) + b2 y ( x2 ) = 0
Writing the harmonic equation as:
u = 1, v = 0, w = 1 (proper BVP) h = h2 0 h real
2
( y ) + wy = 0
y ( x ) = A cos x + Bsin x
Then, from the BCs:
A
a1 cos x1 b1 sin x1 a1 cos x1 b1 sin x1 A
=
c
a cos x b sin x a sin x + b cos x B ij ( ) B = 0
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
cij ( ) = 0 h2 with h = 1, 2, 3, ...
yh ( x ) = ( a1 sin h x1 + b1 h cos h x1 ) cos h x ( a1 cos h x1 b1 h sin h x1 ) sin h x
Besides:
x2
x1
yh ( x ) yk ( x ) dx = 0
for h k
by the orthogonality relations, and for h = k can be computed using:
cos 2 h x
cos 2 h x
1
sin 2 h x
sin 2 h x dx = 2 x 4 h + c and sin h x cos h x dx = 2 h + c
Luca dAgostino, 2015/16.
Special Functions
BOUNDARY VALUE PROBLEMS
The BVP for the Bessel Equation in a Cylindrical Region
Consider the Sturm-Liouville problem for:
2 2
1
y + y + 2 y = 0
x
x
on 0 x l
with
yy = finite as x 0
ay + by = 0 at x = l
and 2 real. Writing the Bessel equation as:
2
2
2
u
=
x,
v
=
x,
w
=
x
0 h real
h
h
2
( xy ) + x y = 0
x
y ( x ) = AJ ( x ) + BY ( x )
Then, from the BCs:
Y ( z ) as z 0
aJ ( l ) + b J ( l ) = 0
B=0
y ( x ) = AJ ( x ) = J ( x )
l = h l = h
h2 = h2 l 2 = h
yh ( x ) J ( h x )
h = 1, 2, 3, ...
Besides:
J ( x ) J ( x ) x dx = 0
l
for h k
by the orthogonality relations, and for any value of h = k can be computed using:
1 2 2
2
J
x
x
dx
=
x J ( h x ) J 1 ( h x ) J +1 ( h x ) + c
(
)
h
2
Luca dAgostino, 2015/16.
Special Functions
BOUNDARY VALUE PROBLEMS
The BVP for the Bessel Equation in an Annular Region
Consider the Sturm-Liouville problem for:
2 2
1
y + y + 2 y = 0
x
x
on x1 x x2
a1 y ( x1 ) + b1 y ( x1 ) = 0
a2 y ( x2 ) + b2 y ( x2 ) = 0
with
and 2 real. Writing the Bessel equation as:
u = x, v = 2 x, w = x h = h2 0 h real
2
2
( xy ) + x y = 0
x
y ( x ) = AJ ( x ) + BY ( x )
Then, from the BCs:
a1 J ( x1 ) + b1 J ( x1 ) a1Y ( x1 ) + b1Y ( x1 ) A
A
=
c
(
)
ij
B = 0
B
a
J
x
+
b
x
a
Y
x
+
b
(
)
(
)
(
)
(
)
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
cij ( ) = 0 h2 = h with h = 1, 2, 3, ...
yh ( x ) = a1Y ( h x1 ) + b1Y ( h x1 ) J ( h x ) a1 J ( h x1 ) + b1 J ( h x1 ) Y ( h x )
Besides:
x2
x1
yh ( x ) yk ( x ) x dx = 0 for h k (by the orthogonality relations)
and for h = k can be computed either numerically or using the closed form representations of:
J ( x ) x dx ,
2
Luca dAgostino, 2015/16.
Y ( x ) x dx
2
and
J ( x )Y ( x ) x dx
Special Functions
BOUNDARY VALUE PROBLEMS
The BVP for the Legendre Equation
Consider the Sturm-Liouville problem for:
h ( h + 1)
2x
on 1 x 1
y
y
+
y=0
1 x2
1 x2
with BCs:
yy = finite at x = 1
Writing the Legendre equation as:
u = 1 x 2
2
1 x y + y = 0
v = 0
and
Here y ( x ) = APh ( x ) + BQh ( x ) and, from the BCs:
w = 1
= h ( h + 1)
Qh ( x ) as x 1 B = 0 y ( x ) = yh ( x ) = Ah Ph ( x )
The orthogonality relations for the yh s are:
Ph ( x ) Pk ( x ) dx = 0
for h k
A closed-form expression can be obtained for:
1
2
2
for any value of h
P
x
dx
=
(
)
h
1
2h + 1
Luca dAgostino, 2015/16.
(proper BVP, h 0 )
Special Functions
BOUNDARY VALUE PROBLEMS
Nonhomogeneous Sturm-Liouville BVPs
A linear nonhomogeneous ODE for y ( x ) :
y + py + ( q + r ) y = f
on
( x1, x2 )
with
real coefficients p ( x ) , q ( x ) , r ( x )
free parameter
known term f ( x )
and either type of BCs at xi = x1 , x2 :
ai y ( xi ) + bi y ( xi ) = 0
y ( x1 ) = y ( x2 )
and
with ai , bi constants, not both zero (homogeneous BCs)
y ( x1 ) = y ( x2 )
With the usual transformation:
p ( x ) dx
v ( x ) = qu ;
u ( x ) = e
;
w ( x ) = ru
(periodic BCs)
and
g ( x ) = fu = fe
the ODE becomes:
(uy ) + ( v + w ) y = g
Proper nonhomogeneous Sturm-Liouville BVPs defined (as before) when:
u > 0;
v 0 and
b1 a1 < 0 at x = x1
Luca dAgostino, 2015/16.
w > 0 on ( x1 , x2 )
and
b2 a 2 > 0 at x = x2
p ( x ) dx
Special Functions
BOUNDARY VALUE PROBLEMS
Solution of Nonhomogeneous Sturm-Liouville BVPs
Assume a solution of:
(uy ) + ( v + w ) y = g
as a series expansion in the eigenfunctions yh of the homogeneous BVP:
on ( x1 , x2 )
y ( x ) = ah yh ( x )
h =1
with unknown coefficients ah
Substituting in the nonhomogeneous differential equation and using:
(uyh ) + ( v + h w ) yh = 0 ah (uyh ) + v + h w + ( h ) w yh = g
h =1
or:
a ( ) wy
h =1
=g
Compute the coefficients ah ( h ) using the orthogonality conditions:
x2
x1
wyh yk dx = 0 for h k ak ( k ) wyk yk dx =
x2
x1
x2
x1
gyk dx
Therefore, finally:
x2
gyh dx
h
y
x
(
)
h
x2
h =1 ( )
= h
h wyh yh dx
y( x) =
x1
x1
Luca dAgostino, 2015/16.
unique solution
no solution, unless g yh