0% found this document useful (0 votes)
55 views13 pages

Inclusive 2

This document provides a grade and feedback on a student submission titled "inclusive 2". The student received a grade of 40 out of 50, which is a distinction grade. The feedback praised the student for making good use of academic literature and providing thoughtful adjustments to lesson plans. Areas of strength included demonstrating understanding of inclusive education requirements and identifying student learning needs supported by literature. Minor improvements could be made to writing style and structure. Overall, the assessor was pleased with the student's work.

Uploaded by

api-330776122
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
55 views13 pages

Inclusive 2

This document provides a grade and feedback on a student submission titled "inclusive 2". The student received a grade of 40 out of 50, which is a distinction grade. The feedback praised the student for making good use of academic literature and providing thoughtful adjustments to lesson plans. Areas of strength included demonstrating understanding of inclusive education requirements and identifying student learning needs supported by literature. Minor improvements could be made to writing style and structure. Overall, the assessor was pleased with the student's work.

Uploaded by

api-330776122
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

inclusive 2

by Emily Willett

FILE INCLUSIVE-_ESSAY_2.DOCX (110.44K)


T IME SUBMIT T ED 15-APR-2017 05:04PM WORD COUNT 2684
SUBMISSION ID 794060061 CHARACT ER COUNT 15066
good

1
2

good point

good point
good

good

good
good

demonst rat ed underst anding


good
inclusive 2
GRADEMARK REPORT

FINAL GRADE GENERAL COMMENTS

Instructor

40
Emily
40

Distinction

I f eel you have made good use of your academic


literature in this assignment.

/50 Your adjustments are appropriate, thoughtf ul,


well designed and well supported.

Kerry

PAGE 1

QM good
good

Comment 1
p.

PAGE 2

Comment 2
clear

QM good point
good point

QM good point
good point

PAGE 3

QM good
good

QM good
good
QM good
good

PAGE 4

QM good
good

QM demonstrated understanding
you have demonstrated your understanding of the requirements of this task

PAGE 5

QM good
good

PAGE 6

PAGE 7

PAGE 8
RUBRIC: 10 20 8 4 INCLUSIVE ED. ASS. 2 39 .50 / 50

CRIT ERION 1 8 / 10
Identif ies areas of need/strengths and uses literature to support observations and learning needs. /10

FAIL Presents a limited understanding of areas of need/strengths.


(3)

PASS Presents a satisf actory understanding of areas of need/strengths


(5)

CREDIT Presents a sound understanding of areas of need/strengths.


(6.50)

DISTINCTION Presents a highly developed understanding of areas of need/strengths


(8)

HIGH DISTINCTION Presents a superior understanding of areas of need/strengths


(9)

HD Presents a superior understanding of areas of need/strengths


(10)

CRIT ERION 2 25 / 30
Uses current literature and the universal design f or learning f ramework to justif y approaches taken.
Makes appropriate changes to existing lesson plan /30

FAIL Shows limited understanding of the universal design f or learning f ramework


(10) Inappropriate changes to lesson plan

PASS Shows an understanding of the universal design f or learning f ramework


(16) Satisf actory changes to lesson plan

CREDIT Shows a thorough understanding of the universal design f or learning f ramework


(20) Highly satisf actory changes to lesson plan

DISTINCTION Shows a highly developed understanding of the universal design f or learning


(25) f ramework Highly appropriate changes to lesson plan

HIGH DISTINCTION Shows a superior understanding the universal design f or learning f ramework
(28) Superior changes to lesson plan

HD Shows a superior understanding the universal design f or learning f ramework


(30) Superior changes to lesson plan

CRIT ERION 3 6.50 / 10


Presents work in accordance with academic writing conventions (e.g. APA ref erencing style, structure,
attention to spelling and grammar, use of relevant literature) /10

FAIL Inadequate writing style, signif icant weaknesses in general writing and academic
(3) writing conventions including APA ref erencing

PASS Generally clear presentation; sentences coherent and grammatically correct;


(5) Generally accurate APA ref erencing
CREDIT Well-structured with ef f ective grammatical expression, sound control of general
(6.50) and academic writing conventions including APA ref erencing.

DISTINCTION Clear and concise structure; Subtle and f luent writing style, thorough control of
(8) general and academic writing conventions including APA ref erencing.

HIGH DISTINCTION Sophisticated and f luent writing style, high level mastery of general and academic
(9) writing conventions including APA ref erencing.

HD Sophisticated and f luent writing style, high level mastery of general and academic
(10) writing conventions including APA ref erencing.

You might also like