0% found this document useful (0 votes)
465 views8 pages

Indeterminate Truss Analysis Guide

The document describes a test problem involving a pin-jointed truss structure with applied loads. It provides the following information: 1) The truss has loads of 22.7 kN and 45 kN applied at joint A and one member (AB) was fabricated too short. 2) Students are asked to form the global stiffness matrix, solve for non-zero displacements, and analyze axial forces in members 1 and 3 with only the 22.7 kN load and the correct member length. 3) The learning outcomes are to identify the structure's degrees of freedom, establish member stiffness matrices, assemble the global stiffness equation, and determine member axial forces.

Uploaded by

dixn__
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
465 views8 pages

Indeterminate Truss Analysis Guide

The document describes a test problem involving a pin-jointed truss structure with applied loads. It provides the following information: 1) The truss has loads of 22.7 kN and 45 kN applied at joint A and one member (AB) was fabricated too short. 2) Students are asked to form the global stiffness matrix, solve for non-zero displacements, and analyze axial forces in members 1 and 3 with only the 22.7 kN load and the correct member length. 3) The learning outcomes are to identify the structure's degrees of freedom, establish member stiffness matrices, assemble the global stiffness equation, and determine member axial forces.

Uploaded by

dixn__
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

ECS468 (INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES)

Example 1 (Adopt Test 2 March 2010)

Figure Q1 shows a pin-jointed truss with loads 22.7 kN and 45 kN applied at joint A. In
addition to the load shown, member AB was found fabricated 5 mm too short.

a) Form the global stiffness relations corresponding to the unconstrained degrees of freedom
and solve for the non-zero degrees of freedom.

b) Analyse for the axial forces in members 1 and 3 if, the structure is still acted upon by the
22.7 kN load (without the 45 kN load) and member AB was considered cut to the right
length (no fabrication error).

Given A = 322 mm2 for all members in the pin-jointed truss and E = 200 GPa

6m 45 kN
1

22.7 kN
A

6m
2
3

B C

9m 9m

Figure Q1
Learning Outcomes:
This test is designed to access student ability’s on:
 able to identify and number the unconstrained degree of freedoms of the indeterminate
truss and able to determine the non-zero degrees of freedom.
 able to establish the element stiffness matrices of all members in global coordinate system.
 able to assemble the structure stiffness equation
 able to determine the axial forces for the given members using the element stiffness
matrices and force vectors.
ECS468 (INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES)

4
Solution:

6m 45 kN 2
1

1
22.7 kN
A

6m
6 2 8
3

B 5 C 7

9m 9m

Figure Q1

a) Form the global stiffness relations corresponding to the unconstrained degrees of freedom
and solve for the non-zero degrees of freedom. (CO2-PO3)

Du D1 = ? Qu Q3 = ?
D2 = ? Q4 = ?
Q5 = ?
Dk D3 = 0 Q6 = ?
D4 = 0 Q7 = ?
D5 = 0 Q8 = ?
D6 = 0
D7 = 0 Qk Q1 = 22.7
D8 = 0 Q2 = - 45
ECS468 (INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES)

Member Stiffness Matrix

 C x2 CxC y  C x2  CxC y 
 
AE  C x C y C y2  CxC y  C y2 
k
L   C x2  CxC y C x2 CxC y 
 
 C x C y  C y2 CxC y C y2 

Member 1, L = 10.82 m
xF  xN 90 y F  y N 6  12
C x  cos  x    0.8318, CY  sin  x    0.5545
L 10.82 L 10.82

C x  0.6919, CY  0.3075, , C x C y  0.4612


2 2

3 4 1 2
 0.6919  0.4612  0.6919 0.4612  3
 0.4612  0.3075
AE  0.4612 0.3075 4
K1 
10.82  0.6919 0.4612 0.6919  0.4612 1
 
 0.4612  0.3075  0.4612 0.3075  2

Member 2, L = 10.82 m

xF  x N 9  0 yF  y N 60
Cx  cos  x    0.8318, CY  sin  x    0.5545
L 10.82 L 10.82

C x  0.6919, CY  0.3075, , CxC y  0.4612


2 2

5 6 1 2
 0.6919 0.4612  0.6919  0.4612 5
 
AE  0.4612 0.3075  0.4612  0.3075 6
K2 
10.82  0.6919  0.4612 0.6919 0.4612  1
 
 0.4612  0.3075 0.4612 0.3075  2
ECS468 (INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES)

Member 3, L = 10.82 m

xF  xN 9  18 yF  y N 6  0
Cx  cos  x    0.8318, CY  sin  x    0.5545
L 10.82 L 10.82

Cx  0.6919, CY  0.3075, , CxC y  0.4612


2 2

7 8 1 2
 0.6919  0.4612  0.6919 0.4612  7
 
AE  0.4612 0.3075 0.4612  0.3075 8
K3 
10.82  0.6919 0.4612 0.6919  0.4612 1
 
 0.4612  0.3075  0.4612 0.3075  2
ECS468 (INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES)

K = K1 + K2 + K3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

 2.0757 0.4612 0.6919 0.4612 0.6919 0.4612 0.6919 0.4612  1


 
 0.4612 0.9225 0.4612  0.3075  0.4612  0.3075 0.4612  0.3075 2

 0.6919 0.4612 0.6919  0.4612 0 0 0 0  3


 
AE  0.4612  0.3075  0.4612 0.3075 0 0 0 0  4
K
10.82  0.6919  0.4612 0 0 0.6919 0.4612 0 0 
  5
 0.4612  0.3075 0 0 0.4612 0.3075 0 0  6
 
 0.6919 0.4612 0 0 0 0 0.6919  0.4612 7
 0.4612  0.3075 0 0 0 0  0.4612 0.3075  8

Q5 0   0.8318 
   
 Q 0 AE  0 . 005   0 . 5545 

6
 Q1 0  10.82  0.8318
   
 
 2 0 
Q   0 .5545
Q5 0   0.0003844
   
 Q6 0   AE   0 . 0002562 
 Q1 0   0.0003844 
   
Q 
 2 0  
 0 . 0002562 
ECS468 (INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES)

Q = KD + Q0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

22.7  2.0757  0.4612  0.6919 0.4612  0.6919  0.4612  0.6919 0.4612   D1   0.0003844  1
       
  45   0.4612 0.9225 0.4612  0.3075  0.4612  0.3075 0.4612  0.3075  D  0.0002562  2
 2
 Q3    0.6919 0.4612 0.6919  0.4612 0 0 0 0  0  0  3
       
 Q4  AE  0.4612  0.3075  0.4612 0.3075 0 0 0 0  0  0  4

 Q  10 . 82   0  AE  
  0.6919  0.4612 0 0 0.6919 0.4612 0 0   0.0003844 
5
 5  
 Q6    0.4612  0.3075 0 0 0.4612 0.3075 0 0  0  0.0002562  6
       
 Q7    0.6919 0.4612 0 0 0 0 0.6919  0.4612   0  0  7

 Q8   0.4612  0.3075 0 0 0 0  0.4612 0.3075   0   0  8


   
ECS468 (INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES)

 22.7  AE  2.0757 0.4612   D1  0.0003844 


 
 45  10.82  0.4612 0.9225  D   AE 0.0002562 
    2  

 22.7   0.1918 0.0426   D1  0.0003844 


 45   AE  0.0426 0.0853   D   AE 0.0002562 
    2  

 D1   2.987 x103 m 
  
 D2   0.0127m 

c) Analyse for the axial forces in members 1 and 3 if, the structure is still acted upon by the
22.7 kN load (without the 45 kN load) and member AB was considered cut to the right
length (no fabrication error). (CO2-PO3)

22.7  AE  2.0757 0.4612  D1 


     
 0  10.82  0.4612 0.9225   D2 

22.7   0.1918  0.0426  D1 


   AE   
 0   0.0426 0.0853   D2 

 D1  2.067 x10 3 m
  3 
  
D 2 1 .032 x10 m 
ECS468 (INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES)

Member End Forces


 DNX 
 
 C X CY 
AE  D 
qF   CY CX NY

L  DFX 
 
 DFY 

Member 1

 0 
 
 0.8318 0.5545 0.8318  0.5545 
64400  0 
q1  3 
10.82 2.067 x10
 3 
1.032 x10 

q1  6.827 kN T 

Member 3

 0 
 
0.8318  0.5545  0.8318 0.5545 
64400 0 
q3  3 
10.82 2.067 x10
 3 
1.032 x10 

q3  6.827kN C 

You might also like