Introduction To Banking Industry
Introduction To Banking Industry
The Indian Banking industry, which is governed by the Banking Regulation Act of India, 1949
can be broadly classified into two major Categories, non-scheduled banks and scheduled banks.
Scheduled banks Comprise commercial banks and the co-operative banks. In terms of
Ownership, commercial banks can be further grouped into nationalized Banks, the State Bank of
India and its group banks, regional rural banks and private sector banks (the old/ new domestic
and foreign). These Banks have over 67,000 branches spread across the country in every city and
villages of all nook and corners of the land. The first phase of financial reforms resulted in the
nationalization of 14 major Banks in 1969 and resulted in a shift from Class banking to Mass
Banking. This in turn resulted in a significant growth in the geographical Coverage of banks.
Every bank had to earmark a minimum percentage of their loan portfolio to sectors identified as
“priority sectors”. The Manufacturing sector also grew during the 1970s in protected environs
the banking sector was a critical source. The next wave of reforms saw the nationalization of 6
more commercial banks in 1980. Since then the number of scheduled commercial banks
increased four-fold and the number of bank branches increased eight-fold. And that was not the
limit of growth. After the second phase of financial sector reforms and liberalization of the sector
in the early nineties, the Public Sector Banks (PSB) s found it extremely difficult to compete
with the new private sector banks and the foreign banks. The new private sector banks first made
their appearance after the guidelines permitting them were issued in January 1993. Eight New
private sector banks are presently in operation. These banks due to their late start has access to
state-of-the-art technology, which in turn helps them to save on manpower costs. During the year
2000, the State Bank of India (SBI) and its 7 associates accounted for a 25 percent share in
deposits and 28.1 percent share in Credit. The 20 nationalized banks accounted for 53.2 percent
of the deposits and 47.5 percent of credit during the same period. The share of foreign banks
(numbering 42), regional rural banks and other scheduled Commercial banks accounted for 5.7
percent, 3.9 percent and 12.2 percent respectively in deposits and 8.41 percent, 3.14 percent and
B12.85 percent respectively in credit during the year 2000.about the detail Of the current
scenario we will go through the trends in modern economy Of the country.
Current Scenario:
The industry is currently in a transition phase. On the one hand, the PSBs, which are the
mainstay of the Indian Banking system are in the process of shedding their flab in terms of
excessive manpower, excessive Non Performing Assets (NPAs) and excessive governmental
equity, while on the other hand the private sector banks are consolidating themselves through
mergers and acquisitions. PSBs, which currently account for more than 78 percent of total
banking industry assets are saddled with NPAs (a mindboggling Rs 830 billion in 2000), falling
revenues from traditional sources, lack of modern technology and a massive workforce while the
new private sector banks are forging ahead and rewriting the traditional banking business model
by way of their sheer innovation and service. The PSBs are of course currently working out
challenging strategies even as 20 percent of their massive employee strength has dwindled in the
wake of the successful Voluntary Retirement Schemes (VRS) schemes. The private players
however cannot match the PSB’s great reach, great size and access to low cost deposits.
Therefore one of the means for them to combat the PSBs has been through the merger and
acquisition (M& A) route. Over the last two years, the industry has witnessed several such
instances. For instance, HDFC Bank’s merger with Times Bank Icici Bank’s acquisition of ITC
Classic, Anagram Finance and Bank of Madurai. Centurion Bank, Indusind Bank, Bank of
Punjab, Vysya Bank are said to be on the lookout. The UTI bank- Global Trust Bank merger
however opened a Pandora ’s Box and brought about the realization that all was not well in the
functioning of many of the private sector banks. Private sector Banks have pioneered internet
banking, phone banking, anywhere banking, mobile banking, debit cards, Automatic Teller
Machines (ATMs) and combined various other services and integrated them into the mainstream
banking arena, while the PSBs are still grappling with disgruntled employees in the aftermath of
successful VRS schemes. Also, following India’s commitment to the W To agreement in LTD.
respect of the services sector, foreign banks, including both new and the existing ones, have been
permitted to open up to 12 branches a year with effect from 1998-99 as against the earlier
stipulation of 8 branches.Tasks of government diluting their equity from 51 percent to 33 percent
in November 2000 has also opened up a new opportunity for the takeover of even the PSBs. The
FDI rules being more rationalized in Q1FY02 may also pave the way for foreign banks taking
the M& A route to acquire willing Indian partners. Meanwhile the economic and corporate sector
slowdown has led to an increasing number of banks focusing on the retail segment. Many of
them are also entering the new vistas of Insurance. Banks with their phenomenal reach and a
regular interface with the retail investor are the best placed to enter into the insurance sector.
Banks in India have been allowed to provide fee-based insurance services without risk
participation, invest in an insurance company for providing infrastructure and services support
and set up of a separate joint venture insurance company with risk participation.
INTRODUCTION TO UNITED BANK AND ITS MANAGEMENT
On March 30, 2009, the Indian government decided to approve the restructuring United Bank of
India. The cabinet has approved the government's proposal to investing 2.50 billion rupees in
shares by March 31, and another 5.50 billion in the next fiscal year in Tier-I capital instruments.
The move is part of the Indian government's program to improve the capital base of the state-
owned banks.
History:
UBI was the result of the merger in 1950 of four Bengali banks: Comilla Banking
Corporation (founded by Narendra Chandra Datta in 1914 in what is now Bangladesh), Bengal
Central Bank (founded by Sri J.C. Das in 1918), Comilla Union Bank (founded by Sri L.B.
Dutta in 1922) and Hooghly Bank(founded by Sri D.N. Mukherjeee 1932).
The issue of Non Performing Assets has been discussed at length for financial system all over the
world. The problem of NPAs is not only affecting the banks but also the whole economy. In fact
high level of NPAs in Indian banks is nothing but a reflection of the state of health of the
industry and trade.
The paper deals with understanding the concept of NPAs, its magnitude and major causes for an
account becoming non-performing, projection of NPAs over next three years in Public sector
banks and concluding remarks.
Asset”. The dreaded NPA rule says simply this: when interest
asset. The recovery of loan has always been problem for banks
factors.
2.1 Definitions:
from the year ending March 31, 2004. Accordingly, with effect
(OD/CC),
15
purposes.
within 180 days from the end of the quarter with effect from
April 1, 2002 and 90 days from the end of the quarter with
capacity of banks.
banks fail to utilize this benefit to its advantage due to the tear
itself is getting hard to do. The Indian economy has been much
by FIs, etc.
16
Rs. 110000 crores Bankers have realized that unless the level
survive.
However lending also carries credit risk, which arises from the
fact that the biggest banking failures were due to credit risk.
17
Willful Defaults
18
There are borrowers who are able to pay back loans but
Natural calamities
Industrial sickness
Lack of demand
minimum label. Thus the banks record the non-recovered part as NPAs and
With every new govt. banking sector gets new policies for its operation. Thus
it has to cope with the changing principles and policies for the regulation of
19
government to revive the handloom sector has not yet been implemented.
So the over dues due to the handloom sectors are becoming NPAs.
i. Principles of safety
i. Principles of safety :-
1. Tangible assets
2. Success in business
1. Character
2. Honest
3. Reputation of borrower
Inappropriate technology
20
investment.
from_
a. From bankers.
b. Enquiry from market/segment of trade, industry,
business.
those who are not able to repay it back. They should use
Managerial deficiencies
1. Marketability
2. Acceptability
21
3. Safety
4. Transferability.
keep all the eggs in one basket”; it means that the banker
Re loaning process
the worst case, if the banks fails, owners lose their assets.
22
shareholders.
natural resources.
the country.
'out of order'.
‘ Overdue’:
bank.23
CAUSES FOR NON-PERFORMING ASSETS IN PUBLIC SECTOR BANKS
Introduction
Granting of credit for economic activities is the prime duty of banking. Apart from raising
resources through fresh deposits, borrowings and recycling of funds received back from
borrowers constitute a major part of funding credit dispensation activity. Lending is generally
encouraged because it has the effect of funds being transferred from the system to productive
purposes, which results into economic growth. However lending also carries a risk called credit
risk, which arises from the failure of borrower. Non-recovery of loans along with interest forms a
major hurdle in the process of credit cycle. Thus, these loan losses affect the banks profitability
on a large scale. Though complete elimination of such losses is not possible, but banks can
always aim to keep the losses at a low level.
Non-performing Asset (NPA) has emerged since over a decade as an alarming threat to the
banking industry in our country sending distressing signals on the sustainability and endurability
of the affected banks. The positive results of the chain of measures affected under banking
reforms by the Government of India and RBI in terms of the two Narasimhan Committee
Reports in this contemporary period have been neutralized by the ill effects of this surging threat.
Despite various correctional steps administered to solve and end this problem, concrete results
are eluding. It is a sweeping and all pervasive virus confronted universally on banking and
financial institutions. The severity of the problem is however acutely suffered by Nationalised
Banks, followed by the SBI group, and the all India Financial Institutions.
iii. To project the NPAs in public sector banks over next three years using Trend Analysis as
tool.
Methodology:
In order to meet the Third objective, the method of Moving Averages is been used, from which
we arrive at a Trend Analysis. While the rationale behind selection of 'Three year Moving
Average' method is because of the availability of the data. The data available was from the ten
years and needless to say that for such a data a 'Six year Moving average' or a 'Eight year
Moving Average' will not work out.
Meaning of NPAs:
An asset is classified as Non-performing Asset (NPA) if due in the form of principal and interest
are not paid by the borrower for a period of 180 days. However with effect from March 2004,
default status would be given to a borrower if dues are not paid for 90 days. If any advance or
credit facilities granted by banks to a borrower becomes non-performing, then the bank will
have to treat all the advances/credit facilities granted to that borrower as non-performing without
having any regard to the fact that there may still exist certain advances / credit facilities having
performing status.
Though the term NPA connotes a financial asset of a commercial bank, which has stopped
earning an expected reasonable return, it is also a reflection of the productivity of the unit, firm,
concern, industry and nation where that asset is idling. Viewed with this perspective, the NPA is
a result of an environment that prevents it from performing up to expected levels.
The definition of NPAs in Indian context is certainly more liberal with two quarters norm being
applied for classification of such assets. The RBI is moving over to one-quarter norm from 2004
onwards.
Magnitude of NPAs:
In India, the NPAs that are considered to be at higher levels than those in other countries have of
late, attracted the attention of public. The Indian banking system had acquired a large quantum of
NPAs, which can be termed as legacy NPAs.
Dealing with NPAs involves two sets of policies
As far as old NPAs are concerned, a bank can remove it on its own or sell the assets to AMCs to
clean up its balance sheet. For preventing fresh NPAs, the bank itself should adopt proper
policies.
A strong banking sector is important for a flourishing economy. The failure of the banking sector
may have an adverse impact on other sectors. The Indian banking system, which was operating
in a closed economy, now faces the challenges of an open economy.
On one hand a protected environment ensured that banks never needed to develop sophisticated
treasury operations and Asset Liability Management skills.
On the other hand a combination of directed lending and social banking relegated profitability
and competitiveness to the background. The net result was unsustainable NPAs and consequently
a higher effective cost of banking services.
One of the main causes of NPAs into banking sector is the directed loans system under which
commercial banks are required a prescribed percentage of their credit (40%) to priority sectors.
As of today nearly 7 percent of Gross NPAs are locked up in 'hard-core' doubtful and loss assets,
accumulated over the years. The problem India Faces is not lack of strict prudential norms but
i. The legal impediments and time consuming nature of asset disposal proposal.
A lot of practical problems have been found in Indian banks, especially in public sector banks.
For Example, the government of India had given a massive wavier of Rs. 15,000 Crs. under the
Prime Minister ship of Mr. V.P. Singh, for rural debt during 1989-90. This was not a unique
incident in India and left a negative impression on the payer of the loan.
Poverty elevation programs like IRDP, RREP, SUME, SEPUP, JRY, PMRY etc., failed on
various grounds in meeting their objectives. The huge amounts of loan granted under these
schemes were totally unrecoverable by banks due to political manipulation, misuse of funds and
non-reliability of target audience of these sections. Loans given by banks are their assets and as
the repayment of several of the loans were poor, the quality of these assets were steadily
deteriorating. Credit allocation became 'Loan Melas', loan proposal evaluations were slack and as
a result repayment were very poor.
* Internal factors
* External factors
Internal factors:
• Funds borrowed for a particular purpose but not use for the said purpose.
• In-ability of the corporate to raise capital through the issue of equity or other debt
instrument from capital markets.
• Business failures.
• sister concerns.
• Deficiencies on the part of the banks viz. in credit appraisal, monitoring and follow-ups,
External factors:
• Sluggish legal system - Long legal tangles Changes that had taken place in labour laws
Lack of sincere effort.
• Industrial recession.
• Shortage of raw material, raw material\input price escalation, power shortage, industrial
recession, excess capacity, natural calamities like floods, accidents.
• Failures, non payment\ over dues in other countries, recession in other countries,
externalization problems, adverse exchange rates etc.
• Government policies like excise duty changes, Import duty changes etc.,
2. Preventing NPAs:
2.1 At the pre-disbursement stage, appraisal techniques of bank need to be sharpened. All
technical, economic, commercial, organizational and financial aspects of the project need to be
assessed realistically. Bankers should satisfy themselves that the project is technically feasible
with reference to technical know how, scale of production etc. The project should be
commercially feasible in that all background linkages by way of availability of raw materials at
competitive rates and that all forward linkages by way of assured market are available. It should
be ensured assumptions on which the project report is based are realistic. Some projects are born
sick because of unrealistic planning, inadequate appraisal and faulty implementation. As the
initiative to sanction or reject the project proposal lies with the banker, he can exercise his
judgment judiciously. The banker should at the pre-sanction stage not only appraise the project
but also the promoter – his character and his capacity. It is said that it is more prudent to sanction
a 'B' class project with an 'A' class entrepreneur than vice-versa. He has to ensure that the
borrower complies with all the terms of sanction before disbursement.
2.2 A major cause for NPA is fixation of unrealistic repayment schedule. Repayment schedule
may be fixed taking into account gestation or moratorium period, harvesting season, income
generation, surplus available etc. If the repayment schedule is defective both with reference to
quantum of instalment and period of recovery, assets have a tendency to become NPA.
2.3 At the post-disbursement stage, bankers should ensure that the advance does not become and
NPA by proper follow-up and supervision to ensure both assets creation and asset utilisation.
Bankers can do either off-site surveillance or on site inspection to detect whether the unit /
project is likely to become NPA. Instead of waiting for the mandatory period before classifying
an asset as NPA, the banker should look for early warning signals of NPA.
2.4 The following are the sources from which the banker can detect signals, which need quick
remedial action:
1. a) Scrutiny of accounts and ledger cards – During a scrutiny of these, banker can be on
alert if there is persistent regularity in the account, or if there is any default in payment of interest
and instalment or when there is a downward trend in credit summations and frequent return of
cheques or bills,
2. b) Scrutiny of statements – If the scrutiny of the statements submitted by the borrower
reveal a sharp decline in production and sales, rising level of inventories, diversion of funds, the
banker should realise that all is not well with the unit.
3. c) External sources – The banker may know the state of the unit through external
sources. Recession in the industry, unsatisfactory market reports, unfavourable changes in
government policy and complaints from suppliers of raw material, may indicate that the unit is
not working as per schedule.
2.5 Personal visit and face-to-face discussion – By inspecting the unit the banker is able to see
for himself where the problem lies - either production bottlenecks or income leakage or whether
it is a case of willful default. During discussion with the borrower, the banker may come to know
details relating to breakdown in plant and machinery, labour strike, change in management, death
of a key person, reconstitution of the firm, dispute among the partners etc. All these factors have
a bearing on the functioning of the unit and on its financial status.
2.6 ‘Special Mention’ category of accounts – Based on warning signals obtained through both
off-site and on-site monitoring, banks may classify accounts with irregularities persisting for
more than 30 days under ‘Special Mention’ or ‘Potential NPA’ category. This will help the bank
to initiate proactive remedial measures for early regularisation. The measures include timely
release of additional funds to borrowers with temporary liquidity problems and restructuring of
accounts of sincere and honest borrowers after considering cases on merit.
2.7 On going classification – Although classification of assets is a yearly exercise, banks would
do well to have a system of on going classification of assets and quarterly provisioning. This
helps in assessing provisioning requirements well in advance. All doubts regarding classification
should be settled internally and a system of fixing accountability for failure to comply with the
regulatory guidelines should be introduced.
2.8 Strategy for reducing provision – The extent of provision for doubtful asset is with reference
to secured and unsecured portion. Cent percent provision needs to be made for the unsecured
portion. If banks can ensure that the loan outstanding is fully secured by realisable security, the
quantum of provision to be made would be less. It takes one year for a sub standard asset to slip
into doubtful category. Therefore, as soon as an account is classified as substandard, the banker
must keep strict vigil over the security during the next one year because in the event of the
account being classified as doubtful, the lack of security would be too costly for the bank.
3. Reducing NPAs
3.1 Cash recovery – Banks, instead of organising a recovery drive based on overdues, must short
list those accounts, the recovery of which would provide impetus to the system in reducing the
pressure on profitability by reduced provisioning burden. Vigorous efforts need to be made for
recovery of critical amount (overdue interest and instalment) that can save an account from NPA
classification:
1. a) In case of a term loan, the banker gets 90 days after the date of default to take
appropriate action and to persuade the borrower to pay interest or instalment whichever is due.
2. b) In case of a cash credit account, the banker gets 90 days for ensuring that the
irregularity in the account is rectified.
3. c) In case of direct agricultural loans, the account is classified NPA only after two
crop seasons (from sowing to harvesting) from the due date in case of short duration loans and
one crop season from the due date in case of long duration loans.
3.2 Up gradation of assets – Once accounts become NPA, then bankers should take steps to up
grade them by recovering the entire overdues. Close follow-up will generally ensure success.
3.3 Compromise settlements – Wherever feasible, in case of chronic NPAs, banks can consider
entering into com8promise settlements with the borrowers.
3.4 Recovery through legal recourse – Since provision amount progressively increases with
increase in time, it is necessary to take steps to recover dues either through persuasion or by legal
recourse. A strategy of fixing a dead line for recovery may force the bank to either recover or
shed the asset off the balance sheet. Banks may file suits promptly against wilful defaulters.
Banks can take recourse under either a civil suit or the Special Recovery Acts passed by various
states or the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security
Interest (SARFAESI) Act, 2002. The bank should vigorously follow up the legal cases.