Response 1 R1
ANOVA for selected factorial model
Analysis of variance table [Partial sum of squares - Type III]
Sum of Mean F p-value
Source Squares df Square Value Prob > F
Model 0.000 0
Residual 49.48 15 3.30
Lack of Fit 17.46 7 2.49 0.62 0.7267 not significant
Pure Error 32.02 8 4.00
Cor Total 49.48 15
10.
Term Effect SumSqr % Contribtn
Error A-papel 2.99167 53.7004 54.161
Error B-humedad -0.0583333 0.0204167 0.0205918
Error C-dir de rasg -1.925 22.2338 22.4245
Error AB -0.141667 0.120417 0.121449
Error AC -1.075 6.93375 6.99322
Error BC 0.0416667 0.0104167 0.010506
Error ABC -0.108333 0.0704167 0.0710206
Error Lack Of Fit 0 0
Error Pure Error 16.06 16.1977
Lenth's ME 0.807158
Lenth's SME 1.16051
Design-Expert® Sof tware
(resistencia)^1
Normal Plot of Residuals
Color points by v alue of
(resistencia)^1:
99
8.2
0.7 95
90
Normal % Probability
80
70
50
30
20
10
5
-1.66 -0.74 0.19 1.11 2.03
Internally Studentized Residuals
Response 1 resistencia
Transform: Power Lambda: 1 Constant: 0
ANOVA for selected factorial model
Analysis of variance table [Partial sum of squares - Type III]
Sum of Mean F p-value
Source Squares df Square Value Prob > F
Model 0.000 0
Residual 99.15 23 4.31
Lack of Fit 83.09 7 11.87 11.83 < 0.0001 significant
Pure Error 16.06 16 1.00
Cor Total 99.15 23
Values of "Prob > F" less than 0.0500 indicate model terms are significant.
In this case there are no significant model terms.
Values greater than 0.1000 indicate the model terms are not significant.
If there are many insignificant model terms (not counting those required to support hierarchy),
model reduction may improve your model.
The "Lack of Fit F-value" of 11.83 implies the Lack of Fit is significant. There is only a
0.01% chance that a "Lack of Fit F-value" this large could occur due to noise.
Significant lack of fit is bad -- we want the model to fit.
Std. Dev. 2.08 R-Squared 0.0000
Mean 4.07 Adj R-Squared 0.0000
C.V. % 51.00 Pred R-Squared -0.0888
PRESS 107.96 Adeq Precision
A negative "Pred R-Squared" implies that the overall mean is a better predictor of your
response than the current model.
Coefficient Standard 95% CI 95% CI
Factor Estimate df Error Low High
Intercept 4.07 1 0.42 3.19 4.95
Final Equation in Terms of Coded Factors:
(resistencia)1 =
+4.07
Final Equation in Terms of Actual Factors:
(resistencia)1 =
+4.07083
The Diagnostics Case Statistics Report has been moved to the Diagnostics Node.
In the Diagnostics Node, Select Case Statistics from the View Menu.
Proceed to Diagnostic Plots (the next icon in progression). Be sure to look at the:
1) Normal probability plot of the studentized residuals to check for normality of residuals.
2) Studentized residuals versus predicted values to check for constant error.
3) Externally Studentized Residuals to look for outliers, i.e., influential values.
4) Box-Cox plot for power transformations.
If all the model statistics and diagnostic plots are OK, finish up with the Model Graphs icon.
