Scribd
Upload
99 views1 page

General Luna Road, Baguio City Philippines 2600: Research and Development Center

This document contains an ethics review form for evaluating research proposals. It has 18 components that assess whether the research study adequately addresses important ethical considerations such as having a qualified researcher, an appropriate research design, procedures that respect participant privacy and confidentiality, voluntary participation, and minimizing risks to participants. The reviewer is asked to check "Yes", "No", or provide remarks for each component. At the end, the reviewer classifies the risk level of the study and recommends whether the study is approved, needs minor or major revisions, or comments/suggestions.

Uploaded by

Wilson
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
99 views1 page

General Luna Road, Baguio City Philippines 2600: Research and Development Center

This document contains an ethics review form for evaluating research proposals. It has 18 components that assess whether the research study adequately addresses important ethical considerations such as having a qualified researcher, an appropriate research design, procedures that respect participant privacy and confidentiality, voluntary participation, and minimizing risks to participants. The reviewer is asked to check "Yes", "No", or provide remarks for each component. At the end, the reviewer classifies the risk level of the study and recommends whether the study is approved, needs minor or major revisions, or comments/suggestions.

Uploaded by

Wilson
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER

General Luna Road, Baguio City Philippines 2600


Telefax No.: (074) 442-3071 Website: [Link]/rdc E-mail Address: rdc@[Link]

ETHICS REVIEW FORM (RESEARCH PROPOSAL)

To the ethics reviewer:


Evaluate the presence of the important ethical considerations in the application by checking the appropriate column.
COMPONENTS YES NO REMARKS
[Link] researcher/lead researcher has adequate trainings on the design
and methodology to be used.
2. The researcher/lead researcher possesses the necessary background
knowledge to conduct the study.
[Link] research can be completed successfully in the indicated time.
[Link] research design is appropriate to the study.
[Link] proposed methods for testing the stated hypothesis are
appropriate.
[Link] data analysis procedures are appropriate.
[Link] study is NOT a duplication of a previous study.
8. The data collection procedures respect the privacy of the participants.
9. The data collection procedures guarantee anonymity of the participants
(if the informants/participants opt for non-disclosure of identity).
[Link] data collection procedures guarantee confidentiality of information
(if informants/participants opt for non-disclosure of information).
[Link] selection of participants ensures objective and non-discriminatory
procedures.
12. A provision is made that participation in the research is voluntary and
that participants can withdraw anytime.
13. There is a provision made for the participants to be informed of the
results of the study.
[Link] are sufficient measures to minimize the risks identified in the
study.
15. There is evidence that the participants will not suffer long term
physical, emotional and psychological harm as a consequence of
participating in the research.
16. The participants will NOT be spending or using their resources for the
research.
17. There is a risk management strategy to address the safety of
participants in studies involving invasive nondiagnostic procedures such
as venipuncture and incision
[Link] is evidence of the contribution of the study to improvement of
life, systems and processes and most especially to the groups involved.

In general, the study is ( ) Low risk ( ) Medium risk ( ) High risk

COMMENTS/SUGGESTIONS:
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Action Taken
( ) The study is approved to commence
( ) The study needs minor revisions prior to commencement
( ) The study needs major revisions prior to commencement

Evaluated by:
_______________________________ _______________
(Signature over printed name) Date

You might also like