Schwaller de Lubicz and the Fourth Reich

Laura Knight-Jadczyk

Many readers have written to me

asking about the work of Rene
Schwaller de Lubicz, and why I
have suggested that work based
on his ideas is misleading. I
have before me the lovely boxed
set of his magnum opus, The
Temple of Man, in which
Schwaller makes all kinds of
claims about the "pharaonic
intelligence" and thought, which
we must take as true simply
because he says so. Oh, indeed,
he does attempt to dazzle the
ignorant and easy believer with
his mathematical and
"symbolique" feats of cerebral
derring-do, but when his
sentences are examined carefully for content, one makes the
most distressing discovery that the word density of Schwaller
is quite low. And he helpfully informs us at the beginning, in
case we don't get it, that if we don't get it, it's going to be our
fault because we aren't bright enough to get it.

Schwaller de Lubicz settled in Egypt in 1938 and for the next

15 years studied the symbolism of the temples, particularly
Luxor, finding what he considered to be proof that the ancient
Egyptians were the ultimate examples of Synarchy, because
the were ruled by a group of elite initiates. He failed to point
out that the Egyptian civilization was static and limited.
What's more, it caved in on itself, and never managed to
produce any significant work of benefit for humanity, as
mathematician Otto Neugebauer showed. In fact, Neugebauer
made it clear that the Egyptian civilization was a hindrance to
the development of mankind. The Pharaonic lifestyle was that
of a small group of the "elite," served and worshipped by
everyone else - and that all others were, essentially,
expendable.

But let's back up a bit and review some history.

Clement of Alexandria established the idea that the

"true philosophy" was Hebrew, and that it was
preserved most closely in the Egyptian "Mystery
Schools." I would like for the reader who has not done so, to
stop right now and read my series of article entitle Who Wrote
the Bible? for a better understanding of why this single point is
so important.

The Ten Commandments declares from the start: "I am the

Lord Your God." But that's only half the story. A reading of
the full verse shows how belief in the God of Torah is
predicated on the Exodus experience: "I am the Lord Your
God, who brought you out of the land of Egypt from the house
of slavery."

The Jewish people have survived for thousands of years,

against all odds, because, as they say, "we knew clearly the
truth of Torah." When the Jews who lived during the times of
the Crusades chose to be burned at the stake rather than
convert, they were certain that they were not dying for a god
and a religion that was based on lies. Many Jews nowadays,
in reaction to "biblical revisionism," claim that to suggest
otherwise is to insult the millions of Jews who have died for
their beliefs. If Torah isn't true, what were they dying for?
And if Torah wasn't true, on what is the "New Covenant of
Christ based?

What is more, to say that the Bible is composed from four

different texts, and that we have an idea of how it was
"invented" or from what other traditions the stories may have
been borrowed with a greater or lesser degree of distortion,
does not deal with the central issue. When we have taken the
whole thing apart and have ascertained, as much as possible,
the approximate legitimacy of each element, there still
remains another question that actually constitutes the essence
of the matter: What are the main trends of the whole? What
are the lines of force running through the ideological field in
which the details are placed?

Well, that started to bug me. I thought about the fact that the
Jews are not the only ones who die for their beliefs, or who
are dying right now for their beliefs, including many
Palestinians. I would also like to point out that, because of
the beliefs of the Jews, and the consequences of those beliefs,
including the creation of Christianity, which was founded on
the platform of Judaism, many multiplied millions of human
beings have died. Out of the deaths that were the result of
World War II, the deaths of Jews constitute only one tenth of
the total. It could be then said that 55 million other human
beings - most of them Christian - died for the sake of the
beliefs of the Jews.

It struck me forcibly that something was wrong with this

picture.

I then further considered the matter: as a result of

Christianity, which evolved out of Judaism, we could begin to
count the numbers of Native Americans, Hawaiians, Africans,
South Americans, and a host of other peoples of a dozen or
more other faiths that have given up their lives to the
depredations of monotheism.
The saying of Jesus, when he was accused of casting out
demons by the power of Satan kept sneaking back into my
head and whispering: "By their fruits you shall know them."
And it was pretty evident that this idea that any one group
had the hotline to God was a tree that bore very bitter fruit. It
then struck me as strange that, automatically, I was using a
saying of Jesus as a yardstick of reality in which I was trying
to determine the reality of Jesus and all that went before. I
realized how deeply this system pervades the psyche of the
Western mind, and how nearly impossible it is to even
formulate a coherent thought without it. Nevertheless, as a
yardstick, the "fruits agenda" seemed to be useful. It
suggested an empirically observable way in which we might
evaluate our reality. We know, for example, that very often a
beautiful plant, with succulent appearing fruit, can be deadly
poison. Contrariwise, some plants that are really ordinary in
appearance, with unattractive fruit, are quite tasty and
beneficial. So, I decided that the "fruits agenda" could safely
be employed as an evaluation criterion.

I tried to imagine a situation in which monotheism - the idea

of one, and only one, universal god with a "chosen group" of
followers and priests - was not the arbiter of our reality. I
tried to imagine a world where religion was not the reason
people would consider themselves more special or "chosen"
than other people, or more "right" or having a monopoly on
the "real" Universal God, in the "right" context, and with the
"right" rituals and modes of worship. I tried to imagine a
world where "saving" others from their errors was not a
priority, and I suddenly realized that such a world, where
everyone accepted everyone else's view of god, or gods, or
worship as being right for them, would be a far more pleasant
world. And suddenly, I realized that Judaism is the trunk of
the tree that bears bitter fruit, and monotheism is at the
root of all the religions that dominate the Western
world today.

During Passover and on Good Friday of this year (2001), the

Los Angeles Times published an article entitled Doubting the
Story of Exodus. A number of Jewish commentators wrote
scathingly that the "the timing was typical of the insensitivity
often shown in mainstream media to religious Jews and
Christians." This insensitivity was compared to publishing an
article on Martin Luther King’s extramarital affairs on Martin
Luther King Day.

I had to wonder when I read that remark if the writer was

even conscious of the comparison he was drawing: that there
are "dirty secrets" behind Yahweh's claim to be a liberator and
a "good guy?" And what is so "insensitive" about TRUTH?

The main complaint of the Jews regarding the findings of the

scholars (in this case, archaeologists in particular) that the
Exodus never happened, is that their whole religion and claim
to Palestine is based on Exodus. If the Exodus never
happened, then there is nothing to Judaism. And, they have a
point.
But that is what the evidence shows: that the story of Exodus,
as told by the Bible, simply never happened. Every effort and
attempt to juggle the times, or suggest real historical
explanations that might fit, end in failure. And believe me, I
have read a lot of them looking for the one that might really fit
myself! I admit that I have been as desperate as anyone to
discover the "truth" of the Bible.

One of my favorite arguments, for a rather long time, was to

denigrate science as being full of anti-religious bias to begin
with, and then I would point out all the accounts of scientific
theories that have been proven wrong in order to support my
argument. I would sneeringly remark that, since scientists
can't make up their mind about anything, or since they often
change their theories based on new data, that we ought not to
believe any of them about anything until they finally give us
the final and complete answer. Meanwhile, we are better off
believing Yahweh and/or Jesus since they do claim to have the
final answer!

I would then point out how the Big Bang proved that God
created the universe, and that scientists didn't like this theory
because of that very reason. The fact of the matter is that
now I have studied the Big Bang theory in some detail, and I
realize that a more materialistic theory of the origins of the
universe has never been invented, and it is actually not a very
good one. The Big Bang theory, despite the best efforts of
many scientists to "cook the data" and make it work, is slowly
being overturned as a useful theory. Does that prove that we
ought to believe the Bible, and that we ought to stop looking
for answers?

And yet again, I am reminded of a parable of Jesus! The story

of the Pearl of Great price where the guy knew that there was
a field with a treasure buried in it, and he sold all he owned to
purchase the field.

Well, of course, that parable is used repeatedly to symbolize

giving up everything you own to have salvation by faith. But
what if that pearl is Knowledge and "giving up everything you
own" means to expend all efforts in the pursuit of knowledge?
What if it relates to the Parable of the Talents and "burying
one's talent" is equivalent to not taking the risk and buying
the field? What if not going after the pearl is the act of
stopping thinking, to stop trying to learn and discover? What
if it is equivalent to stop knocking and asking at the door?
And if we stop, if we do not trade with our talents, and if we
do not exert all our efforts to purchase that knowledge, if we
sit down and bury our talent by settling on a belief and
stopping thinking, will we possibly be cast into outer darkness?

In fact, Jesus said: "You will know the Truth, and the truth will
set you free. The only problem is, different groups have their
own version of the truth, and each group thinks that the
version it has is the right "truth." Is it so that only one group
gets to be right in the end? And if so, which one? And if not,
then what is everybody dying for?

Regarding the general consensus that has been reached

among scholars, after many years of hard work and painful
attempts to prove Exodus, they simply had to be honest with
themselves and admit that they couldn't find what they were
looking for. Those who accuse them of "anti-religious" bias
don't know much about archaeologists. Many of them enter
the field because they want, more than anything, to prove the
Bible to be true. But thankfully, most of them are honest,
even if it hurts. And it certainly has to be painful to report
discoveries when they know they will face vicious attacks from
true believers. One Jewish commentator on the matter wrote:

According to the book of Exodus, the Israelites

spent only 40 years in the desert over 3,000 years
ago. What could possibly remain from a mere 40
years in a desert 3,000 years later? And since
when does the alleged lack of physical proof mean
something never happened or doesn’t exist?

Apparently this writer failed to read the evidence carefully.

Evidence was most definitely found of individuals in the
desert. Some of this evidence was even older than the times
of the supposed Exodus. Some evidence was from later
times. The point was that there was NO evidence found in the
time period in which the Exodus was supposed to have
occurred, and certainly NO evidence of the vast hordes of
Israelites that were supposed to have been members of the
forty year wandering party. And the archaeologists involved
even went to great extremes in allowing as wide a window of
time as possible to cover any and all possible scenarios.

No Exodus; no Cigar.

The above writer would certainly demand some physical proof

if he was charged with a crime in a court of law! And the
point is that it seems that religion is, indeed, guilty of a
crime. The fruits of the religions of man are horrible
persecutions, multiplied millions upon millions of deaths, and
we still persist in saying that we don't need some sort of
evidence that our beliefs are appropriate? Maybe it's true;
maybe we can never have any "proof" of the physical kind that
they are true, but we certainly have circumstantial evidence,
and it all points to monotheism as being guilty of a terrible
crime perpetrated against humanity.

The arguments for the Exodus, as described in the Bible,

descend rapidly to some of the most absurd comments I have
ever read. One writer snidely remarked:

I have no doubt that many of the archaeologists

who are so certain that the Jews never wandered
out of Egypt are quite sure that there is intelligent
life somewhere in the universe. But on what
basis? Despite decades of highly sophisticated
 probing, we do not have a shred of evidence to
support the belief that intelligent life exists
anywhere else. They choose to believe it because
logic suggests to them that intelligent life exists
out there. Well, logic suggests to many of us that
Jews were slaves in Egypt and that there was an
exodus. For thousands of years Jews have been
retelling this story. It is possible that it is all a
3,000-year-old fairy tale, but do logic and
common sense suggest this? Why would a people
make up such an ignoble history? Why would a
people fabricate a myth of its origins in which it is
depicted so negatively?

There is no parallel in human history to the

Hebrew Bible’s negative depiction of the Jews’
national origins. The Torah’s depiction of the
Jews’ exodus from Egypt to Canaan portrays the
Jews as ingrates, rebels and chronic complainers,
undeserving of the freedom G-d and Moses
brought them. Moreover, aside from Moses, the
heroes of the story are nearly all non-Jews. It is
the daughter of Pharaoh who saves and rears
Moses (later Jewish tradition actually holds her to
be his mother); it is a Midianite priest, Jethro,
who tells Moses how to govern the Jewish people;
and the two midwives who refuse the pharaoh’s
order to kill all male Jewish babies are almost
certainly Egyptians. As for Moses himself, he is
depicted as being raised an Egyptian. That is one
of the three reasons I am certain of the Jews’
slavery and exodus. Any people that makes up a
history for itself makes sure to depict itself as
heroic and other peoples as villains. That the
Torah’s story does the very opposite is for me an
unassailable argument on behalf of its honesty.[3]

Aside from the ridiculous comparison of probing outer space -

to which we have no direct access - to the study of
archaeology, which is definitely a hands-on activity with many
tools at its disposal, the argument about the "ignoble"
beginnings is actually specious. In fact, using a history of
slavery and suffering to induce a people to unite into a certain
mode of action is a rather common Machiavellian trick. In
fact, it is precisely the argument Hitler used to rally the
Germans to throw off the yoke of the Treaty of Versailles.
What is more, such an argument is also a backward way of
saying: "See how special we are? We were ingrates and stiff-
necked, and we fought Yahweh all the way. But he chose us,
so what can we do? We are the ones, the only ones, that he
has chosen thus, and therefore it must be because there is
something wonderful and special about us, and nobody else on
the planet is as wonderful and special as we are!" And in fact,
I have found that both arguments are used by Jews - either
one will do when it is convenient. Allow me to point out that
this is not a "Jewish" trait, it is a human trait. What is more,
the Jews are not the only ones who claim an origin as slaves!
But, there is something more to Judaism than meets the eye.
Another commentator pointed out that the Jews have
preserved the Torah and observed all of its meticulous laws for
thousands of years, under the most adverse circumstances,
with minimal deviation, after being scattered all over the world.

The argument that this is proof of the validity of the Bible says
that the various theories of the "Biblical scholars" as to when,
where and by whom the Bible was allegedly composed do not
explain how the "stubborn, stiff-necked" Jewish people (as
described in the Bible) were tricked or coerced into accepting
a purported monumental hoax. Nor do the experts have any
rational explanation as to why the Jews have clung so
tenaciously and meticulously to the commandments for so
many centuries and through so much persecution!

They ask: If the Exodus never happened, how did it become

so deeply ingrained in the collective Jewish psyche? How is it
that no natural Jews, however secular they may be, can trace
their ancestry back further than four generations without
running into a solid line of believers in Torah? What would
cause generation after generation to endure so much suffering
for the sake of some phony hoax some Israelite ruler put over
on the ignorant multitude? The experts have no answer as to
how the entire Jewish people (including the so-called "Ultra
Orthodox") all agreed to go along with a weird scheme and
kept it up for century after century even when easier and
more popular schemes came along.

Good points, yes? How in the world could so many people be

fooled for so long by a purported hoax, when all of them are
so obviously superior in mental and spiritual qualities?

Well, I think we can find the answer to this question, though

the reader will need to bear with me here. First, let's take a
look at a story told to P.D. Ouspensky by Georges Gurdjieff
about an evil magician.

There is an Eastern tale which speaks about a

very rich magician who had a great many sheep.
But at the same time this magician was very
mean. He did not want to hire shepherds, nor did
he want to erect a fence about the pasture where
his sheep were grazing. The sheep consequently
often wandered into the forest, fell into ravines,
and so on, and above all they ran away, for they
knew that the magician wanted their flesh and
skins and this they did not like.

At last the magician found a remedy. He

hypnotized his sheep and suggested to them first
of all that they were immortal and that no harm
was being done to them when they were skinned,
that, on the contrary, it would be very good for
them and even pleasant; secondly he suggested
that the magician was a good master who loved
 his flock so much that he was ready to do
anything in the world for them; and in the third
place he suggested to them that if anything at all
were going to happen to them it was not going to
happen just then, at any rate not that day, and
therefore they had no need to think about it.
Further the magician suggested to his sheep that
they were not sheep at all; to some of them he
suggested that they were lions, to others that
they were eagles, to others that they were men,
and to others that they were magicians.

And after this all his cares and worries about the
sheep came to an end. They never ran away
again but quietly awaited the time when the
magician would require their flesh and skins."

In order to awaken, first of all one must realize

that one is in a state of sleep. And, in order to
realize that one is, indeed, in a state of sleep, one
must recognize and fully understand the nature of
the forces which operate to keep one in the state
of sleep, or hypnosis. It is absurd to think that
this can be done by seeking information from the
very source which induces the hypnosis.

Theoretically, (a man can awaken),but practically

it is almost impossible because as soon as a man
awakens for a moment and opens his eyes, all the
forces that caused him to fall asleep begin to act
upon him with tenfold energy and he immediately
falls asleep again, very often dreaming that the is
awake or awakening.[5]

When I first read this story in 1985 or 86, I was so enraged at

the suggestion that the god of my religion was an evil
magician, that I actually threw the book across the room
against the wall. I fumed and stewed and I'll bet that steam
literally issued from my ears. I was hot! After awhile, when I
had calmed down a bit, I examined the idea in my mind, and a
still, small voice asked me: "what if it's true?"

I was so shocked at such a traitorous thought in my own mind

that I literally clutched my head to drive out the demon! If
ever there was evidence of how Satan works, that thought
creeping into my brain was it! I resorted to a frenzy of prayer
to blot such an idea out of my awareness.

But it wouldn't go away. At that point in my life I had spent

years searching for the ways and means to justify and "prove"
my religion, my faith; and here I was being presented with
about the most controversial thought imaginable: what if it
wasn't just wrong? What if it is a system that is deliberately
contrived to keep people blind?

Well, heck, that's sick! Isn't it?

At about that point in time someone gave me a copy of the
Gnostic texts of Nag Hammadi. I was pretty sure that I was
going to read these very ancient writings - older than most of
the copies of the original Bible we have - and that they were
going to give me clues that would provide a path to inerrancy
and faith. Here, surely, we would find the truth that had been
distorted by millennia of translation and editing. These guys
lived back then, they must have had a clue about what was
going on. The Gnostic writings were going to give me the
keys to reconcile my faith questions.

Guess what? The idea of the Evil Magician as god was right
there at the center of gnosticism. What's more, their version
has barely come down to us because the Catholic church saw
to it that nearly all the copies of such heresy were destroyed
and anybody who subscribed to it was burned at the stake.
Right there, right then, I sat up and took note. Something
was wrong with this picture. And I have spent the last sixteen
years trying to come to some conclusion about which idea
stands up as truth after it has been tested, tried, challenged,
investigated, and essentially taken apart and put back
together.

Yahweh didn't do too well up on the rack in the stress tests.

Neither did Allah. Christianity did only slightly better, and
then, only when I removed the obvious gloss of the Egyptian
resurrection myth and left in the clearly Gnostic teachings
about the "God of this world" being an "evil magician!" When
the reader is fully informed about the variations on these two
themes, it is almost pathetically easy to read the New
Testament and see what might be original to "Jesus," and
what was added by the "creators" of Christianity as we know it.

What was even more interesting was the fact that the only
writings contemporary to the times of early Christianity, which
mention it specifically, remark that it is a "vile superstition."
Yet, what we have as Christianity today, is nothing more or
less than the same religious practices of the peoples who
branded it a "vile superstition." Obviously something very
strange happened between the times of the early Christians,
and the times in which Christianity became the established
religion. And whatever it was that happened, changed
Christianity from a "vile superstition" to an acceptable, all-
inclusive, monotheistic device. In short, it seems evident that
"true Christianity" has completely disappeared from the world
stage and those individuals who call themselves Christian are
not, in fact, Christians in the original sense of the word by any
stretch of the imagination.

The question that comes to mind is: what would the peoples of
that time have considered a "vile superstition," when one is
aware of what they considered normal religious practice? The
only thing that seemed to fit the bill, so to say, is the
possibility that whoever was the figure around which the Jesus
legend was wrapped, was teaching that the "God of this world"
was an "evil magician." Not only that, but that he probably
suggested that man is the manifestation of God, and all
creation is the "body of God," and that there was no point in
praying to an "external god" at all. Now that would have set
just about everybody back then on fire! To suggest that
sacrifice to the gods, that appeasing the gods, that honoring
the gods, that praying to the gods, that expecting to be saved
by or cleansed from sin by any of the gods, was a waste of
time would have been absolute heresy to all of the many
religions! For them, such an idea, and only such an idea,
would have been most definitely a "vile superstition."

In fact, we have something of a parallel in some remarks

about Pythagoras. He was accused of believing the "vile
superstitions" of the barbarians, that a soul is born over and
over again into different bodies. That is clearly NOT an
Egyptian belief as we will soon see.

Getting back to Clement of Alexandria, the Jews who lived in

Alexandria in the centuries after its foundation sought to show
that, although they were ruled by the Greeks, Jewish writings
and teachers had inspired much of Greek culture. They
claimed that the mythical Greek singer Musaeus was really
Moses. Aristobulus, an Alexandrian Jew of the second century
B.C., wrote verses that he attributed to such famous Greek
writers as Sophocles, showing them to believe in a single male
God such as that of the Jews. He asserted that Pythagoras,
Socrates, and Plato had studied the books of Moses and
believed that the world was sustained by the God of the
Hebrews. He claimed that “Plato followed our system of law,
and clearly worked out every detail in it.”

To explain how Plato was able to learn from these Hebrew

writings, Aristobulus said he used a Greek translation of the
Bible. Never mind that this was several centuries before the
first known Greek translation existed!

Clement of Alexandria was writing at a time when the

Christian church was engaged in a struggle with the
predominantly Greek pagan culture. It was necessary for him
to take a very hard line and write some serious propaganda.
Clement claimed not merely that Greek culture was borrowed
but that it was stolen. “They not only stole their religious
doctrines from the barbarians, but they also imitated our [that
is, Jewish] doctrines.”

During these periods, Egyptians were eagerly telling visiting

Greeks that the greatest Greek thinkers depended on Egyptian
instruction. It might be seen as a way of asserting the
importance of their culture, especially in a time when they had
little or no political powers. The Greeks were willing to listen
to what they were told because of their respect for the
antiquity of Egyptian religion and civilization, and a desire
somehow to be connected with it. However, there is no real
reason to believe that Greeks derived their philosophy or
learning from Egypt! At least, not Egypt as we know it today.
[For more details on this matter, please read the series
Jupiter, Nostradamus, Edgar Cayce, and the Return of the
Mongols ]
The story of how the myth of a Greek appropriation of
Egyptian philosophy reached the twentieth century is quite
instructive. Many modern researchers and authors of books
on the many subjects surrounding the renewed interest in
Egyptian religion and its possible relation to great secrets
hidden somewhere on the planet, have made the mistaken
assumption that, from early times, there was such a thing as
an “Egyptian Mystery System,” based in Egypt, as we now
know Egypt, which is what is supposed to have led the Greeks
to come to Egypt to study in the first place.

As it happens, there is no acceptable evidence for this idea.

The works from which this idea derives are either works that
are not philosophical or works of Greek philosophy written by
Greeks who did not know their own history. They created a
genre of literature which declared that their ideas were based
on authentic Egyptian mysteries. This certainly may be true,
but what is crucial to know is that it wasn't Egypt as we know
it today.

During the Renaissance in Western Europe, such works were

suddenly "discovered" and became the rage among
"occultists" and "alchemists" and purveyors of all mystical
wisdom who also did not know the true history of Egypt. They
were taken to be literally true, and representative of Egyptian
mysticism - from the Egypt that they knew - and it is from this
confusion that the idea of "Egyptian Mystical Supremacy" was
created. It didn't hurt that this "philosophy" was also
connected to the pyramids and sphinx, never mind that the
probable true architects of those monuments, and their
civilization had absolutely nothing to do with Egypt as we
know it from the archaeological record.

The myth of Egyptian mysticism took a serious blow in the

nineteenth century following publication of the evidence of the
spade and the translation of real Egyptian writings. [Note also
that so-called Egyptian texts are dated much later than the
pyramids or the sphinx and there is probably no connection at
all between the builders of these monuments and the later
occupants of the country and their writings.] However, the
facts did not seem to make any impact on the masses of "true
believers." The greatest promoter of this invented Egyptian
mysticism were the Freemasons who adopted the fraud in the
eighteenth century. Their version assumed not only the
existence of an Egyptian Mystery System but one that was
connected to a great system of "moral education." The source
of these ideas was a fictional, three-volume novel called
Sethos, based on "Unpublished Memoirs of Ancient
Egypt," published in 1731 by a French priest, the Abbé Jean
Terrasson.

Following the ancient convention, the author pretends to be

translating an unknown manuscript written by an unknown
Greek of the second century A.D. that is ostensibly describing
the Egypt of the thirteenth century B.C. Terrasson portrays a
world of advanced science, technology, art, law, and
educational institutions such as would delight the imagination
of an enlightened eighteenth-century European gentleman.
Access to this ancient science requires the comprehension of a
complex system of mysteries, that can only be penetrated by
long preparation, including study, moral purification, and a
mystical initiation ceremony. Well, that certainly may be true,
but again let me mention that this undoubtedly had nothing to
do with Egypt as we know it today.

Father Terrasson’s novel became very popular and powerfully

shaped the beliefs, practices, and rituals of the Masonic
movement, whose reliance on a mythical, mystical, Egyptian
tradition is perhaps most widely known in its depiction by
Mozart in his Magic Flute. This picture of ancient Egypt was
soon totally discredited by the discoveries of scientific
Egyptology. But, it remains today as a "secret mystical
tradition," that is "rejected" by mainstream science. This
problem would, of course, be neatly solved by understanding
that the true mystery of the "Egyptian Tradition" had nothing
to do with Egypt as we now know Egypt.

At the present time there is a veritable frenzy of publishing

books purporting to reveal the "Greatest Secrets" of all time.
A number of these books have to do with alchemy and devote
sections to the semi-legendary alchemist Fulcanelli,
speculating at great length about what Fulcanelli did or did not
mean, or who he may have really been. All of them seem to
have a similar, general trend, which is to support a certain
"derivation" of the mysteries in terms of Egyptian secrets,
technology, and religion. This trend is the subject of the book
by Lynn Pincknett and Clive Prince, The Stargate
Conspiracy, which is a useful overview for the novice in
terms of achieving a basic understanding of the fact that there
is, indeed, something very mysterious going on all over the
planet in terms of shaping the thinking of humanity via books,
movies, and cultural themes.

Picknett and Prince suggest that the central theme of the

conspiracy is the "manipulation of beliefs about the origins and
history of human civilisation, in particular of beliefs about the
existence of an advanced civilisation in the ancient past and its
influence on the earliest known historical civilisations,
primarily that of Egypt."[1] What Picknett and Prince fail to
note is that the beliefs about the origins and history of human
civilization have been manipulated for millennia to keep
humanity in the dark. Anyone who doubts that this is often
done quite consciously and deliberately ought to have a look
at a few remarks of Cornelius Tacitus about the Roman Raj in
Britain:

The following winter was spent on schemes of the

most salutary kind. To induce a people, hitherto
scattered, uncivilized and therefore prone to fight,
to grow pleasurably inured to peace and ease,
Agricola gave private encouragement-and official
assistance to the building of temples, public
squares and private mansions. He praised the
 keen and scolded the slack, and competition to
gain honor from him was as effective as
compulsion. Furthermore, he trained the sons of
the chiefs in the liberal arts and expressed a
preference for British natural ability over the
trained skill of the Gauls. The result was that in
place of distaste for the Latin language came a
passion to command it. In the same way, our
national dress came into favor and the toga was
everywhere to be seen. And so the Britons were
gradually led on to the amenities that make vice
agreeable - arcades, baths and sumptuous
banquets. They spoke of such novelties as
'civilization', when really they were only a feature
of enslavement.[2]

If anyone cares to suggest that this sort of manipulation has

not continued down to the present day, I suggest an in-depth
examination of some of these periods of history wherein great
"advances" manifested, including the personal writings of the
individuals involved, as we will be doing further along in this
volume. It is quite a revelation to discover that a great "idea"
has been imposed upon us simply because the alternative
view, which had more supporting evidence, was not believed
by the "authority" due to religious prejudices.

What is taking place at our present moment in history is what

is known in popular intelligence parlance as "damage control,"
a vast COINTELPRO operation against the revelation of Truth
in its proper context. In place after place, in all fields of
scientific study, discoveries are being made that contradict
what we have been taught to believe about our world, our
history and origins. And it seems that at the present, a very
powerful and concerted effort is being made to divert these
discoveries into a framework that will continue to serve the
agenda of the Control System Matrix.

Picknett and Prince rightly notice that the "alternative history"

that is being proposed by the current spate of books, gurus,
New Age mass market workshops and symposia, utilizes ideas
and concepts born in the "occult world." Unfortunately, they
fail to distinguish the fact that what is "occulted" comes in two
flavors: truth and just more and trickier lies.

In the past several few years we have indeed been deluged

with a tidal wave of books about ancient mysteries that have
enthralled the world. The most widely promulgated of these
books are by authors such as Henry Lincoln, Graham Hancock,
Robert Bauval, and John Anthony West, Robert Temple,
Laurence Gardiner, and a supporting cast too numerous to
mention. Picknett and Prince astutely note that such writers
may not be conscious participants in the Damage Control
system, but that they are most definitely being provided with
the grist for mills of a massive cover-up operation - a shell-
game of reality with moves so dexterous that unless the
reader understands from the beginning that the hand is,
indeed, quicker than the eye, they will be lulled by the obvious
truths so that at the point the lie is introduced, they will
swallow it at once without noticing that it is a lie. And make
no mistake about it: these lies are intended to be a deadly
poison, slow acting, but 100 percent lethal, as we will discover
by the time we reach the end of this survey.

We would like to note here that Picknett and Prince, with their
powerful reaction against anything that threatens the status
quo belief system, may be similarly unconsciously
manipulated. Whether or not that is the case remains to be
seen, but Picknett and Prince do seem to have pushed far
enough into the mystery to have revealed one of the chief
pegs upon which the Cover- up is suspended: the work of
Rene Schwaller de Lubicz.

Most of the current "Alternative Egyptology" is based on the

works of RSL as discovered and promoted by John Anthony
West. R.A. Schwaller de Lubicz (1887-1961), was an occult
philosopher who, in the 1940s and 50s, wrote several books in
French about the religion of ancient Egypt. RSL believed that
the Sphinx was attributable to Atlanteans and that it predated
the known ancient Egyptian civilization by many thousands of
years. He made the observation that the erosion on the
Sphinx’s body and the walls of the enclosure appears to be the
result of exposure to water, rather than wind-blown sand, and
argued that it had been caused by a great flood – the flood
that destroyed Atlantis - the mythical Flood of Noah.

There is much evidence that strongly suggests that the more

ancient date of the Sphinx must be accepted, as well as the
likelihood of an ancient advanced civilization, for example, the
work of geologist, Robert Schoch. However, Picknett and
Prince recoil in horror at such an idea, proclaiming that
Schoch’s work, and his conclusions are still very controversial
and the subject of debate. At this point, Picknett and Prince
begin to swallow gnats and strain at camels in their efforts to
dislodge this one single issue of the redating of the sphinx and
the possibility of an ancient civilization on Earth.

Why? Because, indeed, they have found evidence of

something malicious and sticky moving like a hungry beast,
smacking its drooling lips behind the scenes of these
presentations.

Picknett and Prince then take great pains to viciously attack

Edgar Cayce and other psychic sources because, of course, if
he is saying that there were ancient civilizations - some of the
same things that those who are promoting this political
agenda are saying - then he must be part of the conspiracy,
too!

But, in the way of all Damage Control and Disinformation, this

is a typical ploy. If someone has discovered something of
truth about the Matrix, the agents are sent in to associate with
that person, to try to subvert or co-opt their work, and then to
twist it into something that supports a negative agenda.
Then, they deliberately set up a situation where the conspiracy
is exposed as negative, and the original speaker of truth, by
association, is discredited.

Picknett and Prince are right about the fact that there is a lot
of so-called occult, psychic, New Age channeled material that
is purely evil - part of this conspiracy to cover up the failures
in the old belief systems. But they are wrong to believe that
the system that is in place, the beliefs that have been
promulgated on humanity for millennia are the benevolent
results of natural human evolution, or a benign and omniscient
God who has our best interests at heart. In fact, Picknett and
Prince do not even seem to notice the fact that the present
Matrix of beliefs is crumbling, and this is what has
necessitated this co-opting and perversion of truth. If there
was no failure of the old system, there would be no need for a
new one. P & P recoil in horror at the Conspiracy they have
uncovered, but they do not realize that the old system is
exactly the same and that they have fallen for the oldest of
Machiavellian tactics: create an enemy by demonizing your
opponent, and then step in as a savior to do exactly what you
have accused the opponent of planning. P & P do not seem to
be fully cognizant of the subtle nature of disinformation tactics
and how cleverly it has been used throughout the millennia to
deliver lies wrapped in truth. As a result of this, again and
again they toss out the baby with the bathwater.

P & P go to some considerable trouble to outline the history of

the occult Synarchist movement without even coming to the
realization that this is precisely the system that is in charge of
our world and has been for a very long time. Essentially,
Synarchy advocates government by secret society, a group of
"enlightened initiates" who rule from behind the scenes. It's
pretty evident that political history and a broad overview of
the forest is not P & P's strong suit. As Gary Allen put it in
None Dare Call It Conspiracy, it doesn’t matter which
political party gets elected, those who pull the strings of
government - all governments - remain unknown to the
masses.

P & P tell us that Synarchists identified three key pillars of

society that, once under the control of his elite, would allow
them to rule without the population even being aware of their
existence. These were the political and social institutions, the
economic institutions and the religious institutions. Surprise,
surprise! P & P need to wake up and smell the coffee! Those
three pillars of society have been under the control of a hidden
group for a very, very long time, and there is plenty of
evidence to support that fact. As FDR said, "Nothing in politics
happens by accident. If it happens, you can bet it was
planned that way."

Nevertheless, the Synarchy philosophy of Joseph Alexander

Saint-Yves d’Alveydre (1824-1909), the culprit identified by P
& P, developed in the early 1870s, was formed around certain
mystical and occult ideas. St-Yves believed in the existence of
spiritually superior beings that could be contacted
telepathically and that the ruling elite ought to be made up of
people who were in communication with them. He himself
claimed that he was in touch with these beings, and that they
actually gave him the principles of Synarchy.

Okay. Let's stop right here and look at this. It seems from a
rather mountainous pile of evidence to be a fact that
"spiritually superior" beings do exist. But "superior" in what
sense? Superior in power? Knowledge? Insight? Abilities?
All of these things ought to be taken into account when one is
considering the idea of "spiritually superior beings." As I have
discussed elsewhere, it does seem to be evident that
"ethereal" or "para-physical" beings do exist, but whether or
not they have mankind's best interests at heart is something
that has to be very carefully determined. For too long we
have labored under the implanted delusion that just because a
being is not "like us," in certain terms, it is "better" or "good"
or "angelic." Dr. John Dee made this error when
communicating with what were clearly negative beings who he
mistakenly called "angels." And many others have made
similar errors because of the cunningly implanted lie that
"spiritual" is necessarily positive.

So, we have no argument with communicating with "spiritual

beings." We merely wish to point out that one must be careful
to analyze the ideas - determine the lines of force - presented
by these beings in order to determine what their unstated
agenda might be. In the case of Synarchy, we should like to
point out that any beings who suggest the creation of an elite,
hierarchical gang of rulers who must be served and
worshipped can't be the "good guys." But then, this has been
the case throughout history as evidenced in our standard
religious systems.

Saint-Yves' ideas were taken up by Helena Blavatsky (1831-

1891), followed by Alice A. Bailey (1880-1949), and
promulgated in any number of "secret societies." But again, in
all of these cases, we have to note that lies will not be
swallowed unless they are wrapped in heavy sugar coatings of
truth. And in these cases, there is much of truth and value to
be derived that can never happen, of course, when one tosses
the baby out with the bathwater.

But P & P do this with gusto. And because they have a pre-
formed opinion about the evil nature of any and all such
groups, when they begin to examine other sources that may
not be connected to this operation at all, they look for clues of
conspiracy that simply are not there, believing that they find it
in situations or words that have a completely different
meaning when taken in the proper context. For example, P &
P write:

Significantly, the third member of the trio, James

Allen McCarty, who joined L/L Research in 1980,
had already worked closely with a group in Oregon
who had claimed to channel the same entity as
Edgar Cayce. [Source cited: The Ra Material, by
Elkins, Rueckert and McCarty, p. 47)
As I understand it, Cayce never channeled any entities. He
claimed to read the "akashic records" which is quite different
from channeling an "entity." But there is more. What is
actually said in the Ra Material cited above by P & P is "In
the fall of 1980, he (Jim) traveled from Kentucky to Oregon to
work with this group which was supposedly channeling the
same source that Edgar Cayce had channeled in deep
trance. ...After only two months in Oregon [Jim returned.]"

Not to put too fine a point on it but changing the word from
"source" to "entity" smacks of prestidigitation. Not only that,
but two months sort of doesn't fit "had already worked closely
with a group..." as the sentence is constructed by P & P. How
many other "well researched" items in this book have been
similarly twisted so subtly? And that, of course, makes one
ask the question: what is THEIR agenda? "Meet the new boss,
same as the old boss."

Giving them the benefit of the doubt, we do understand the

position of P & P. It's one thing to pursue conspiracy theories
and to find them and track them and think that there are
some very naughty folks here on the Big Blue Marble. It's an
altogether different thing, after one has tracked enough of
these theories, to come to the realization that they are all just
different parts of the same elephant, and that the critter is
really thousands of years old. When that fact smacks you in
the face, either you run screaming in denial, or you begin to
step back from the truly BIG picture, the global-millennial
picture, and you see that there is a very stinky rat
somewhere. Having arrived at that point, you realize that
such a conspiracy could not be created or sustained by human
beings - at least not alone. And then you have to face the
most difficult task of all: asking yourself who or what could be
behind it?

Having asked that question, you realize that you simply

cannot answer it unless you open your mind to a whole
constellation of possibilities that you would formerly never,
ever, in your wildest dreams have considered. Then, if you
work very, very hard, you may discover the "truth" that they
want you to believe.

If you work very, very hard and are very, very lucky, you will
realize that you need help, and you will seek this help based
on the knowledge you have acquired that such help can and
does exist - only we generally do not have access to it
because we are too easily duped and manipulated - then you
might begin to learn the rules of communicating with higher
levels of consciousness than our own. Having learned the
rules by doing your homework, you just might be able to
ensure that your "source" is not just another "evil magician."
At such a point, following such an approach, there is some
hope of sorting out the mess. But it isn't easy, and it can't be
easy. If it was easy, it would have been done hundreds or
thousands of years ago and the world would not be in the
state it is in today.
Getting back to the Synarchists and Occult secret societies, P
& P have most definitely tripped over the elephant's trunk and
have followed it to it's end, even if they have ignored the body
it is attached to in the other direction. It is becoming
increasingly evident that the secret societies that are already
running our planet have an agenda that is clearly not to our
benefit, and indeed, they are manipulating economics, religion
and politics to serve that agenda. What seems to be the case
about the so-called New Age is that the emergent ideas of
contact with "higher beings" has been regularly co-opted for
nefarious purposes.

Saint-Yves’s Synarchy ideas became very influential in the

occult circles of Europe. P & P remark that "Some of the
greatest figures in subsequent occult history were devotees of
Saint-Yves, which is not surprising because occultists, with
their love of hierarchy, tend to be naturally totalitarian and
unegalitarian."

It is most definitely true that occultists of the negative variety

are big on hierarchy and totalitarianism. But that is most
certainly not the case with the positive variety that P & P have
included in their chop job. In fact, the presence of a hierarchy
is chief means of identifying the lines of force of negative
groups, and is the modus operandi of nearly every formalized
religion on the planet, which ought to give P & P pause. It is
also very evident from our own experiences that either a great
many individuals in control of society are involved in these
occult secret societies, or that the societies themselves are
being set up as decoys to distract attention away from the real
"gang" who runs the show.

P & P connect Papus (real name Gérard Encausse, 1865-1916)

to Saint-Yves. Papus was an enormously influential figure in
the world of esoteric secret societies in the late 19th and early
20th centuries. They also connect the Martinists to Saint-
Yves, and through them, the modern day Templar and
Rosicrucian societies and the New Kid on the Block, the Priory
of Sion. Lest the reader ask the question, indeed, P & P have
connected them all up with the Freemasons! Toss in the OTO,
the Golden Dawn and assorted Satanists, and you have a nice
row of decoy ducks who are busily working for their masters,
none of them realizing the Machiavellian nature of the drama,
and that the "agents" of a coup are always the first to be
destroyed. After all, if they betray their own kind, they will
betray the new master.

P & P tell us that such groups are behind the coming "New
World Order," in specific the "United States of Europe." P & P
point out that Synarchy favors undemocratic and totalitarian
regimes, and then they rightly connect this movement to the
development of Fascism and the suggestion that Synarchists
were behind the Nazi ideology. All of these groups are
implicated in social, religious, political and economic
conspiracies, and most curious of all, they ALL seem to be
looking for something.
What are they looking for? Well, call it the Holy Grail or the
Ark of the Covenant, or the Head of Baphomet, or the treasure
of the Templars, Cathars, the body of Christ, or whatever - all
of these seem to be the cover stories that have been created
to engage the populace at large in both the concept, and the
activity itself. It took me a long time to realize this, but once I
did, it all made perfect sense. These groups are missing a big
piece of their set of dominoes. They try to pretend that they
have it, or that they know where it is, or that it is this or that,
when it is actually something else. All the while, they are
promoting "global treasure hunts" and informal "think tanks"
among the populace in hopes that somebody will figure it out
and make the discovery that they haven't been able to make
for 2000 years or longer.

Does the reader remember the movie "Raiders of the Lost

Ark?" Well, it wasn't just a movie. It was the promulgation of
a concept, a challenge, to amateurs to engage in the quest, in
hopes that one of them might discover the key. How many
readers are familiar with the excitement surrounding a
purported "secret" of Rennes-le-Chateau and the Priory of
Sion? Well, that's just a variation on the movie "Raiders of
the Lost Ark." It is a real live stage set, created to induce
interest and research, in hopes that some amateur will be able
to do what these secret societies have not been able to do for
these many thousands of years. Researchers come along, dig
and dig and track ideas and things all over the planet. They
make amazing discoveries because something has, indeed,
been set up for them to discover. And then they write the
great new book that has "solved the mystery." They crow and
pat themselves on the back that they, of all the researchers
working on the problem, have discovered the answer. And
how do they know that? Well, because their path was
"aided." They experienced so many "synchronicities" and
amazing connections along the way that surely that is proof
that they found the right clues!

That would be very nice to believe if it weren't for the fact that
we seem to be dealing with a hyperdimensional system that is
capable of producing such effects for the express purpose of
leading researchers astray and it happens to all of them.

Again, I repeat, they are looking for something that they

believe to exist, and they have an idea that finding it will give
them ultimate and total power over the forces of life and
nature. And they are using the public to do their leg work,
constantly monitoring them for any fruitful directions to follow.

Does such an object exist? Perhaps. Perhaps not. Perhaps it

exists, but it is not at all what they think it is. And perhaps,
like the sword in the stone, it can only be found and wielded
by the "right person." So, perhaps they are looking for that
person, also?

Returning now to the disinformation campaign incepted by the

Occult secret societies with their ostensible motive as we have
just described, even if it is true that Synarchic goals are
negative to humanity, the likelihood is that those negative
goals are wrapped in layers of truth about humanity and
human history - for a reason. And P & P missed that one.
The fact is, if many of the ideas and teachings of such groups
about human history prove to be correct, how easy it will be
for them to claim that since they are right about those things,
they are also right about their political, social, and economic
aims? And that is how the most effective disinformation works.

By the same token, if P & P are proven wrong about their

claims against the alternative history aspects of the
conspirators, then their related claims that there is a
conspiracy will likewise be ignored. And that would be a
terrible mistake.

Synarchist groups have been implicated in terrorism in the pre-

WW II years. In the years leading up to the Nazi takeover of
Germany, a Frenchman named Viven Postel du Mas wrote a
notorious document called the Synarchist Pact, which became
their manifesto. In 1932, a society called the Synarchist
Empire Movement was founded in France, which was described
as ‘a secret society with very specific and limited membership,
following a definite politico-economic programme’. P & P
discovered that this group was behind right-wing terrorist
gangs such as the CSAR (Secret Committee for Revolutionary
Action), and that most of the CSAR membership were also
part of the Synarchist Empire Movement. In 1941, a police
report in Vichy France exposed a plot by Synarchists to take
over the government, noting a close relationship between the
Synarchist movement and the Martinist Orders.

It seems that after WW II, the Synarchists went even deeper

underground in order to work on Plan B, since Plan A (Hitler's
agenda) didn't pan out. In recent years Synarchist groups
have come out into the open both in Europe and in Britain,
and this leads us to P & P's major research find: the
connection between R. A. Schwaller de Lubicz and the
Synarchist movement. Picknett and Prince write:

Given the nature of Synarchy one would probably

never know the names of even the most
powerful. But we do know quite a lot about one of
them: R.A. Schwaller de Lubicz. It is curious that
Schwaller de Lubicz has become the ‘godfather’ of
Alternative Egyptology even though few have read
his works first-hand. His ideas mostly come to us
through the books of Graham Hancock, Robert
Bauval and, of course, John Anthony West, all of
whom have expressed their admiration for this
scholar. They refer to him as a philosopher, or as
a mathematician. What is interesting to us,
however, is that, although Schwaller de Lubicz
was those things, they never call him an occultist
– which he was. And the never call him a
Synarchist – which he was. […]

A leading figure in the Paris Theosophical Society,

 he broke away to form his own occult
organisation, which he called Les Veilleurs – the
Watchers – specifically in order to carry his
esoteric ideas into the political arena. Perhaps it
will come as no surprise to discover that he has
been described as a ‘proto fascist’. He even
claims to have designed the uniform for Hitler’s
SA (‘Brownshirts’). Although it is not certain that
his claim is true, Schwaller de Lubicz clearly had
no problem with people thinking that it was. One
of Schwaller de Lubicz’s ‘Watchers’ was Vivien
Postel du Mas, the man who wrote the Synarchist
Pact of the 1930s. Through du Mas, Schwaller de
Lubicz had a particular influence on Hitler’s
Deputy, the tormented and complex Rudolf Hess.
Schwaller de Lubicz was anti-Semitic and racist –
and, like the Nazis, thought that women were
inferior to men. For example, he taught that
women were intellectually incapable of
understanding the Hermetica. All this is
important, because it is impossible to separate
Schwaller de Lubicz’s political, Synarchist beliefs
from his work as an Egyptologist, the work that
certain authors so admire.[3]

We find it fascinating that these aspects of Schwaller de

Lubicz’s life are seldom - if ever - mentioned. Schwaller de
Lubicz was born in Alsace-Lorraine in 1887, which puts him in
the age group to have been involved in the Parisian occult
scene in the early 1900's, at the exact time that the alchemist
Fulcanelli was becoming a legend. Schwaller de Lubicz also
claimed to be an alchemist, and it seems that the idea that he,
himself, was Fulcanelli has been bruited at several points. The
writing styles and focus demonstrate that this is not the case.
And here we come to the item that interests us: the
disinformation diversion of R.A. Schwaller de Lubicz directed
against the work of Fulcanelli.

You see, Schwaller de Lubicz claimed that Fulcanelli’s book,

Mystery of the Cathedrals, was based on his own idea that the
Gothic cathedrals encoded alchemical symbolism. He further
claims (there is no evidence to support these claims and much
evidence to suggest they are false) that he often met with
Fulcanelli to discuss the transmutation of matter. He even
tells a story about Fulcanelli that sets up his claim that
Fulcanelli stole his work. Schwaller says that one day,
Fulcanelli told him about a manuscript he (Fulcanelli) had
stolen from a Paris bookshop. While cataloguing an ancient
book for a bookseller, Fulcanelli discovered a strange piece of
writing: a six-page manuscript in fading ink, describing,
Fulcanelli claimed, the importance of color in the alchemical
process. But, said Schwaller, when it came to alchemy,
Fulcanelli was a materialist, and so he didn't grasp the true
nature of color. Schwaller, of course, enlightened him, and
then enlightens us that he enlightened Fulcanelli.

Yup, Schwaller sounds like a real alchemical master alright! R.

A. Schwaller de Lubicz, occultist and Synarchist has just told
us that Fulcanelli is a thief and didn't have a clue. How do we
know this is true? Well, because Schwaller de Lubicz says so!
Schwaller de Lubicz, the guy who has no problem with being
thought to have designed Nazi uniforms, and who taught that
women were incapable of comprehending hermetica.

Schwaller gives us more exciting "insights" into the work and

life of Fulcanelli. Certain of the attention of his breathless
audience, he next tells us that he moved to Grasse, in the
south of France, where he invited Fulcanelli to join him in an
alchemical retreat, and Fulcanelli, of course, made haste to
join "the master." How do we know? Well, because Schwaller
tells us so! Again, there is no evidence except the claims of
Schwaller himself. There, so Schwaller says, after much work,
they performed a successful opus, involving the secrets of
"alchemical stained glass." But it is claimed that there was
tension between the two. How do we know? Because
Schwaller said so.

Supposedly, at this point, Fulcanelli returned to Paris and

against Schwaller's advice, tried to perform their work again.
He wasn't successful. This was, Schwaller claimed, because
Fulcanelli left out essential ingredients known only to him
(Schwaller). Ignoring Schwaller's warnings, Fulcanelli
persisted in performing the work in Paris. But his strange
death from gangrene, a day before he was to reveal the secret
to his students, brought an end to his opus. Or so Schwaller
has claimed. Schwaller is directly quoted by author Andre
Vandenbroeck:

He was too materialistic to appreciate the

laboratory events, but that never got in the way
of our collaboration. He was able to devise a
procedure for any operation one could propose,
and that was his importance, as a manipulator.
His practice was fabulous, and I had it in my
service. He did all the manipulations. But the
ideas that moved those hands, the ideas always
came from me. Remember, when I say
‘Fulcanelli', I mean that whole group of literati and
puffers: Canseliet, Dujols, Champagne, Boucher,
Sauvage; they all contributed to give shape to
Fulcanelli's production, once he had spread my
ideas among them. He used my cathedral work
as a vehicle, and a lot of talk about operations he
has had contact with, thanks to me, but whose
function, whose form, whose nomenclature he
doesn't understand. And then the glitter all
around it, the fantastic erudition, much of which
can be traced to Dujols and some to Canseliet;
add the artwork of Champagne, and you have a
very salable book. They made a career out of it,
but in the process, they missed the moment, they
missed the Word...

They did me a favor, though; they saved me from

 identifying my work with cathedral symbolism,
which kept me available for Egypt, for Al-Kemi
instead of alchemy. It is the same work of
course, only in the language of our time, whereas
Fulcanelli speaks in the language of the great
medieval alchemical renaissance. But what we
must be involved with now is not a renaissance, it
is a resurrection. The Great Work is a work of
resurrection...

I was saying that Fulcanelli took it upon himself to

publish what he had advised me not to bring out,
as well as what he had sworn to keep to himself.
You see, one good thing about observing a vow of
secrecy is that you will not talk about what you do
not understand. In Fulcanelli's case what came
out in print is hopelessly garbled, full of
unnecessary obscurity and certainly of no use to
any seriously practicing adept although it gives
much ammunition to puffers with its nice-
sounding phrases.[4]

Having had direct experience with a COINTELPRO operative

who insinuated himself into our lives, and who tried to steal
the corpus of our work, including the notes for the very words
you are reading, who was exposed and ejected from our
association, who then began to write defamatory diatribes
about us and our work, we are familiar with the TASTE of this
activity. We recognize it immediately in the words quoted
above from Schwaller de Lubicz. It is quite easy to see his
objective. It is to trash the work of someone who actually did
it, and to promote the agenda of Fascist Synarchy under the
guise of Alternative Egyptology. In fact, the similarities of
tone, style and semantic content are so identical to other
COINTELPRO operations, that it makes one wonder if they
don't have a computer program that composes this
disinformation?

…Hi, my name is Rene Schwaller de Lubicz. I’ve

always been fascinated with alchemy, though for
some reason (unknown even to myself), I’ve
always indulged in this passion under strict
secrecy, though now that I am a master, I don't
have to keep secrets anymore, and since the
other principle party is dead, I'll tell you all his
secrets and my secrets…. Some years back, I
wrote a little book entitled “The Mystery of the
Cathedrals ” but Fulcanelli stole it from me. As a
scientist, I came up with a small idea, which I
called the “theory of relativity”. Well, It wasn’t
much of a theory, but Albert Einstein stole it from
me and took credit for it…

It should be noted that Andre Vandenbroeck and his wife

Goldian, are, according to them, both "elite members of an
emerging category of authority appropriately understood as
planetary tribal elders. Both studied directly with R. A.
Schwaller de Lubicz, unarguably one of the greatest Hermetic
adepts of our age."

Remember him? R.A. Schwaller de Lubicz, the guy who

designed uniforms for Nazis and taught that women couldn't
grasp hermetica? The guy who hung out with Synarchists and
occultists who promote the rule of the masses by secret
societies in cahoots with "higher beings" who are very likely
the Evil Magician described by Gurdjieff. And now we have an
"emerging category of authority" called a "planetary tribal
elder?" Excuse me? Where was I when the tribe cast the
ballot for that one?

The Vandenbroeck's are busily promoting the idea that

Fulcanelli's highly acclaimed work, The Mystery of the
Cathedrals, was stolen outright from Schwaller. They
support this claim by saying that "Such an allegation appears
highly credible considering Schwaller's later work on the
architectural symbolism of the Egyptian temple at Luxor."
They then go on to promote Schwaller's magnum opus, The
Temple of Man, as "the result of 15 years of on-site study at
the Luxor Temple that exposes Egypt's deepest esoteric
wisdom. The release of Schwaller's masterpiece has been
hailed as the publishing event of the decade. It is a dense and
demanding study of number, harmony and geometry that
serve the supporting metaphysical foundations of ancient
temple design."

And it is pure unadulterated disinformation intended to lead

the reader away from the work of a real master alchemist,
Fulcanelli. Anybody with two neurons in contact with one
another can read Fulcanelli and then read Schwaller and see
the difference. But Schwaller's work is further designed to
support the Stargate Conspiracy as identified by Picknett and
Prince. His ideas are the current "scientific peg" upon which
all of that nonsense about "Egyptian mysteries" are
suspended.

These allusions are sinister because the Third Reich was an

early attempt at a "New World Order," and the Anglo
American business elite was involved with that up to its ears.
Are these fascist allusions coincidental? Or, is the elite coming
out of the closet?

Schwaller was an occult Darwinist. He believed that the

substance of the Universe was mindless, that consciousness
only comes about via evolution of matter - that man "creates"
god only after he has sufficiently evolved to examine the
broad "principles," or "neters" of nature and to use those
principles to "accelerate" his "spiritualization" of his flesh, so
to say.

One thought of the transcendent power compels

one substance of the universal substance -
passive, awaiting any seed - to become a specific
product, an inheritor, a world that follows upon a
world. One sole power in one sole substance
 works through all the transitory finalities toward
the foreseen finality: man.

And at the end of humanity comes man without

body, substance within power. […]

The finality for each phase of genesis is the innate

consciousness of that which precedes it. For
humanity, the finality of genesis is man; for
wisdom, it is Cosmic Man liberated from the
genesis of his element: total, innate
consciousness.

Thus the Universe is incarnate in man and is

nothing but potential Man, Anthropocosmos. And
man is the blueprint, the cosmographical map on
which wisdom reads the Univers, the genesis, the
functions.[…]

The causal energy becomes mineral, mineral

becomes plant, plant becomes animal, animal
becomes man, and man becomes Cosmic Man, the
saint, Buddha, Jesus. The mineral has suffered
scission from the cause, the plant has suffered the
mineral, the animal has suffered the plant, man
has suffered the animal, and Cosmic Man will have
suffered humanity. Vital suffereing is
consciousness undergoing the process of
surpassing itself. […]

Man is the transition, the realized mean term that

dissolves back into the Idea.

And man will have eaten, that is, returned to its

source, all that the Universe knows, from mineral
to animal. […]

The Anthropocosmos is a reality, an indisputable

foundation. The Universe is neither an
"imagination" nor a "will," but a "projection" of
human consciousness. […]

In short, Schwaller was promoting a program that would result

in increased "mechanization" of humanity, the material
projection of the Predator's mind.

The ultimate consciousness is the consciousness

of negation. […]

The West is ignorant of that serenity of which all

of Ancient Egypt bears the imprint. The tombs of
the leaders of this people are consecrated to their
profession of faith in the survival of the soul. […]

And Schwaller has already told us that the "soul" is merely the
"evolutionary by-product of evolution." We are told by
Schwaller that we are to admire this civilization and emulate it
because the abysmally primitive Egyptian art showing endless
head-smiting and the worshipping of men as gods is the
"imprint" of a "profession of faith in the survival of the soul."

The open-minded thinker ought to really consider the

purported mysteries of Egypt in terms of the fact that they
were so ignorant that they devoted a huge amount of energy
to their "cult of the dead." The whole Egyptian schtick is
focused around preserving dead flesh for future or
otherworldly reanimation. The very fact that there are so
many of these dead bodies for Egyptologists to dig up is the
clearest evidence that the Egyptian beliefs were nonsense.
Schwaller tells us that this was evidence of "profession of faith
in the survival of the soul." Horse hockey. There were other
cultures that taught reincarnation and because they clearly
understood that it was a "soul matter," cremated their dead,
or buried them in symbolic "womb shaped" jars, because they
knew that the soul would not use the same body over again.

But, in Egypt, the focus was on the dead flesh - the ignorant
belief that it would be reanimated - the attachment to the
material body - and the desire to get it back again at some
great "resurrection" in the future; an idea we find strongly
present in fundamental Christianity, modeled on the ignorant
Egyptian conceptions of the cosmos.

And this brings us to another strange idea of Schwaller:

In the principle of purusa, or Anthropocosmos, ..

man is not the component part but the final
product. He is not part of the Whole but the living
expression of this Whole… […]

Each human being is a whole, each is in himself

an assemblage of defined qualities. May the
breath of the herald bestow the coat of arms that
will be the emblem, the star one must follow, and
the motto that dictates the conduct to which one
must conform.

Totemism has been greately minsunderstood […]

In the West, we have a heraldry that in its original
"esoteric" sense is a form of totemeism. There is
an esoteric science of heraldry, a pure symbolism
of the particular qualities of an individuality. […]

The human embryo passes through all the phases

of animal genesis, and one more than any other of
these phases influences the man's animal type.
All nature is in man, and a kinship between a man
and a particular aspect of Nature marks him, that
is, "specifies" him as an individuality among men.
[…]

The individuality of a human being is only the

human "finality" of this particularly marked type,
of this branch on the universal trunk of cosmic
genesis. The animal does not have to become
conscious of this moment of universal
consciousness; it is itself the animal aspect of this
moment. This turning back upon itself of
consciousness, a repetition of creation's "self
before itself," is the characteristic of man. […]

Not only is the totemic and heraldic particularity

not an obstacle to this return, but its recognition,
on the contrary, is an exceptional means of
hastening this return. […]

It is not sufficient then merely to recognize the

symbol of one's lineage; more than that, one's life
must be adapted to it, and above all, one must
seek to live all its aspects throughout all of Nature.

Let us set aside the word God, so misunderstood,

and set aside even the God that we call the
Eternal, and call it the Unique instead, in whom
the neters, the powers of functions of Nature are
merged and annihilated. The Unique is, but It
ceases for us when we look upon the stages of
consciousness in their perceptible aspects, that is
Nature. […]

It is with the reversal of consciousness, with the

consciousness of consciousness, the superior
human state, that a break in the natural cycle
may interven in the form of Art, through the
power of negation that marks this turning back of
consciousness. To deny appearances, to deny
polarity, to deny faith in sensorial reality, to
descend voluntarily into the hells of destruction, in
order to rise on the third day - all has been told to
ears that hear not. […]

We must learn to join that which is opposed in

such a way that the elements thus joined cease to
exist separately within the new Unity. […]

We must therefore turn toward the known and

present, final cosmic fruit - the human being - to
know the forces of the environment from which he
arises. […]

All pharaonic Egypt, from beginning to end and in

all its achievements, is but a ritual gesture.

Thus the pharaonic empire presents itself. And

this explains the reaction of the Greeks in Egypt,
who, believing that they were confronted with a
tradition of knowledge "emptied of the reaons" for
its formulations, sought to find reasonable causes,
 a fact that gave birth to the dialectic philosophy
that the West has found so seductive - as if
intellectual arguments could substitute for
knowledge of the cause of life. [Schwaller, The
Temple of Man]

We see from this selection of remarks a most curious

phenomenon in action: all the time he is decrying Western
Science and Greek rationalism, Schwaller de Lubicz has based
his Cosmology on the foundation of evolution and
uniformitarianism turned backward! In short, focus on and
effective worship of, the physical universe is being presented
as the "way back."

Indeed, following Blavatsky and others of that ilk, Schwaller

has created a system in which the ascent of man is merely a
mechanical process, and man himself, is the terminus point of
biological evolution as the mode of "genesis" for "Cosmic
Man," or "spiritualizing" matter. And the way to do this is to
"activate" the "neters" within the self.

What this means is that man must turn in on himself -

consciousness viewing its own history - and "merge" these
elements. The way he proposes to do this is to learn to re-
vivify the animal characteristics of "emotion." Schwaller tells
us that "The animal does not have to become conscious of this
moment of universal consciousness; it is itself the animal
aspect of this moment." And selection and activation of a
"totem" is important to this process. Schwaller writes:

There is in man a cerebral intelligence and also an

innate intelligence called intelligence-of-the-
heart. [Read: Predator's Mind] The latter comes
into being through a fusion of the cosmic Cause
which is contained in its materialization with the
same Cause which is in us. This is possible
because the nature of both Causes is identical.
[…]

In other words, "cosmic cause" and material existence are

identical. Matter creates consciousness, not vice versa.

Our common origin is by no means remote. It

does not take us back into the primeval darkness:
It is present and constant in that man feeds
directly or indirectly on all the kingdoms, and thus
enters into constant exchange with their particular
natures, and, finally, by way of the mineral origin,
with the cosmic energy from which everything
arises. […]

Cerebral intelligence, which we see developed in

the higher animal aspect of man, is strictly limited
by the boundaries imposed on the senses.
Intelligence-of-the-heart belongs to the great
complex called life. […]
 Each organic being (and even each cell of the
organs of an organized being) has its part in the
general life which is its personal specification.
Man's heart is not alone in beating rhythmically
like a motor: there are aquatic beings that are
entirely a heart of this kind and represent the
awakening of the consciousness which will become
"heart." Another consciousness will become liver,
another will become lung, and thus each function
has its organ. […] Such an organ is the
incarnation of a consciousness, of a cosmic
function which has received corporeal life. […]

Each animal, each species of plant, each mineral

group, is a stage in the process of "becoming
aware" of the cosmic cause, culminating in the
complete organism of human man, the microcosm
- man in His image.

In short, the development of consciousness is a by-product of

evolution, and once it has been developed, man ought to use
it to turn right around and go backward and fully develop in
himself the life principles in nature - as read in its physical
manifestation.

The whole, thus formed into a complete living

being, is a language that speaks. It expreses
itself ceaselessly in its living function, and
represents the basis of intelligence-of-the heart,
which is the fact that remains related to all of
Nature and consequently knows Nature. […]

Obviously, therefore, we must be able to

transcribe what is in us into our mental and
objective consciousness, by establishing a
relationship between the life in us and observation
of that life in Nature. This we find supremely well
expressed by the ancient Egyptians. It is a
knowledge of magic, pure and sane, which can
lead rapidly toward the spiritual goal of our lives,
owing to the fact that we can evoke, by means of
the sympathy of analogues in our surroundings,
the consciousness of the heart latent in us.

Intelligence-of-the-heart, which establishes the

relationship between innate consciousness and
observation of fact, is identification.

Identification means to live with and to live in the

oserved fact, to be that fact oneself, to suffer it,
to act in it, rejoice with it. It is sympathetic
consciousness. […] Innate consciousness is
inscribed in the nature of the organism, meaning
that the motive power of its function is the
impulse of its necessity, the Idea, or principle of
harmony. In man, as already in the higher
 animal, this creates emotivity.

In short, one is to identify with the observed world completely,

to live in it, to be it, and so on. And that leads to "emotivity,"
or the feeding of the Predator's mind. Note that his "innate
consciousness" is directly related to the "animal part" of
humanity.

The greater the sensitivity of the emotional

faculty, the better innate consciousness can
express itself. […] The inscription of innate or
sympathetic consciousness is vital of functional, if
life as such and function as such are considered
the very principle of living Nature. This principle
is a reality beyond corporeal matter, but it
assumes a body; it incarnates by means of the
harmony of the ambient elements. […]

The incarnation in man of all the necessities of

functionsal orders of world harmony is the temple,
where the original creative energy connects the
intelligence-of-the-heart's innate consciousness
with the universe. […]

Evolution is also real, starting from the original

energetic impulse, but it obeys a "law of universal
genesis" and not fortuitous conditions.

Surely the function does not create the organ.

How could it act before existing? […]

And here Schwaller clearly denies creative consciousness that

lies behind the material world. Just as all the Darwinists, the
proponents of ideas such as those presented by Richard
Dawkins and others, Schwaller just blithely ignores the
necessity for consciousness to exist PRIOR to the material
world.

The experience of life inscribed in matter is called

innate consciousness, the specific character of
each thing, the quality that is pure spirit in Nature.

In other words, spirit is a byproduct of matter. Experiences of

random molecules jostling in the primordial soup create
patterns that are "inscribed in matter," and this is
"consciousness."

When one beholds the emotional reactions of the

animal - envy, hate, fidelity, love, joy, sadness,
devotion to his master to the point of self-denial -
one says that an animal sometimes seems
human. This is a mistake: it is man who is still an
animal. […]

Reason is the intelligence-of-the-heart which

allows us, in love, to be the thing, to be inside the
 thing, to grow with the plant, to fly with the bird,
to glide with the serpent, to be that "way of a man
with a maid" which the Proverb says cannot be
known; to become cubic space with the cube. […]

At the level of the human animal, all possibilities

of the evolution of material consciousness are
exhausted. It then becomes a question either of a
physical continuity (the legend of the Wandering
Jew) or of a new baptism of spirit, allowing the
original radiance to reliberate itself from matter,
all experiences exhausted, meaning no further
selection is to be made in the materialization of
this radiance: it is received into its universality.
[…]

In short, Schwaller is denying levels of being above man. Man

is the ultimate product of biological evolution, and the only
option is to liberate the mindless creative energy from matter.
It's the end of the line. Now the only right thing for a man to
do is to become a "food processor" for "universality."

Awakening is the awakening of intelligence-of-the-

heart. Reason is born with us. If we give it
preponderance over cerebral intelligence, over the
mental, it will tell us everything, for it is the
intelligence of the universe. [..]

And now Schwaller has introduced a big twist, and this is the
point on which so much New Age disinformation is hung. He
equates "reason" with "intelligence-of-the-heart" that he has
already told us is to be "identified" with the material world.
And of course, he tells us that everything in the material world
IS the intelligence of the Universe. He is completely unable to
grasp the point that the material universe we experience is
only the shadow on the wall of a cave, and he is teaching, in
the most devious ways, that we should see those shadows as
real, and should never, ever, seek to discover the source of
the shadows in truly ethereal terms of higher consciousness
and the realms of pure thought. He is telling us that the only
"higher consciousness" that exists is that which manifests in
the world of nature, of prey and predators, of the Self Serving,
consuming, material world. And for God's sake, don't use the
intellect to reach into higher realms of thought where a world
that is not presently evident - a world where there is
symbiosis and sharing - can be conceived and created!

The stages of this liberation are therefore stages

of fusion. The inscription is no longer seminal; it
is only a degree of detachment. Mastery of the
body and all its members, mastery of thought,
mastery of the passions, are only stages of a
liberation which allows this soul, as in natural
sleep, to live in full consciousness, without the
material instrument, outside the definitive sleep of
our present body.
 To succed in "sleeping" thus in a waking state is
the true clairvoyance of intelligence-of-the-heart.
[…]

In short, stop thinking, fuse with the Predator's mind of

Nature, put the soul to sleep because then you will be able to
live in full Consciousness - the consciousness of the Predator -
the mechanical consciousness of the material world. And in the
following, he fully develops his theme, his Darwinian
Esotericism that promotes the "eating of consciousness," and
the assimilation of light to make it available to the Crypto-
geographic beings of 4th density STS.

Intelligence-of-the-heart is what enables man to

make his way toward liberation. It is to
intelligence-of-the-heart that the scripture or oral
tradition of an esoteric teaching is addressed, and
phrased in a manner most comfomable to that
faculty, even at the risk of seeming irrational.

If we are able to prevent the invervention of

reasoning - that faculty distinguishing us from the
animal properly so-called, and which we
constantly abuse - then simple cerebral
intelligence does no more than translate innate
consciousness, as in the case of animal instinct.
[…]

To know innate consciousness, we must hearken

to it, make use of the spiritual sense which is
Hearing. […] In every life situation, we experience
an emotion. This emotion must be heard; we
have to center the hearing on the emotion in
order to be conscious of our instinctive attitude.
[…]

Thus the purpose of initiatory texts is far less a

logical one than it is to provoke shocks, emotional
reactions, or to grate against the cerebral need for
sequential logic. Paradox, improbably images, the
juxtaposition of unconnected phrases are freely
employed. The texts appeal to sensation, to a
feeling of emotive sensitivity. […]

Indeed. To persuade people to stop thinking, to confuse, to

break the mind into disconnected, chaotic "packets," and to
produce emotional reactions upon which the Dark Hierarchy
feeds. Over and over again in our study of psychopathy, we
came across the fact that one of the observable symptons was
"disharmony between the content of patient's words and his
emotional expression." And here we see Schwaller actively
promoting this primary symptom of psychopathy and
schizophrenia. Why? Well, Topper provided the answer:

Such beings are associated with darkness because

the light- knowledge is drawn into the cavernous
 "black hole" of their congenital emptiness. […] All
the massive, cosmic project they are engaged in
in full consciousness and on the grand scale, is
ultimately a means of "cornering the market" on
energy, monopolizing all the known fields of light
or light potential. The expanding order they
attempt to impose, the totalitarian control over
increasingly large numbers they attempt to exert,
is the fantastical and internally self-contradictory
project of coercing everything in creation to work
for them, to cultivate and keep the fields of their
energy-reserves and to furnish self-replenishing
"herds" of emotional source-nutriment which can
be converted into useful energy or light-capital.
Since the negative beings can't generate an
important light-energy source themselves, they
they use the reserves of the beings effectually
harnessed in thrall to them. […] [Topper]

And this is the agenda of Schwaller de Lubicz. We gather some

interesting clues from his further remarks, suggestions that he
was promoting black magic and sexual activity as the means
of attaining higher consciousness. And, considering his
promotion of identification with the "natural world," one can
only guess what kind of sexual activity he might advocate.

The asexual character of the Christian myth has

colored its entire teaching with a sort of sexual
inhibition which places the Christian cabala apart
from the contingencies of life here below.
Further, its purely moral character smothers the
basis of gnosis, which is as complete here as
elsewhere.

This is in striking contrast to the Atlantean black

cabala, based entirely on sex, that is to say, on
the sexualiztion or dualization of the causal Cause,
God… It is tempting, especially in the Christian
world, to label this theology black magic, the
magic of evil, which is as inane as condemning
our parents to hell for having conceived us in sin.
If the first Christians had followed Saint paul's
counsels of chastity, no one would have remained
to propagate the new faith. […]

He seems to be entirely ignorant of the evidence that this was

precisely what the Cathars taught. In this next remark,
Schwaller reveals the agenda again: fusions, assimilation,
control and domination. To have an idea of what the Egyptians
were really up to, have a look at some of the "art" that is
generally NOT made available to the public:
The badly damaged Turin Erotic Papyrus is 8.5 feet long and
reads from right to left. On the first third of the papyrus,
animals are shown engaging in various human activities. The
rest of the papyrus are vignettes of extremely graphic erotic
scenes showing a brutish man using a woman sexually in a
variety of postures, some of which suggest force, and all of
which definitely suggest lust without love - animal sex. We are
certainly reminded of Ira Einhorn's journal entry:

Sadism - sounds nice - run it over your tongue -

contemplate with joy the pains of others as you
expire with an excruciating satisfaction. Project
outward the vision of inward darkness. Let no
cesspool of inner meaning be concealed. Reveal
the filth that you are. Know the animal is always
there… Beauty and innocence must be violated for
they can't be possessed. The sacred mystery of
another must be preserved - only death can do
that.

We so carefully hide the blackness of our soul

from all those around us (even ourselves) we
forget so easily the impulses of power which
unconsciously control so many of our actions! A
book like Venus in Furs reminds us of what we are
- blackness and light. To beat a woman - what
joy - to bite her breasts and ass - how delightful -
to have her return the favor in our sensitive
areas. How is life to be lived? That is what the
book asks unknowingly. Should we subjugate or
be subjugated. Realize our darkness or at least
become aware of it. Can I love Rita as she is or
must I break her spirit. Does she provide me with
what I want. Often I think not. Investigate -
plunge deeply - leave no stone unturned. You are
one of the rare free spirits do not be saddled by
one who isn't. Life to be lived at its full must be
lived freely. Let nothing stand in your way to
getting what you can - not even the illusion of
love which you know to be so transitory. [quoted
 by Levy, emphasis, mine]

Schwaller: Esoterism is not a particular meaning

hidden in a text, but a state of fusion between the
vital state of the reader and the vital state of the
author.. Thus esoteric teaching is strictly
evocation, and can be nothing other than that.
Initiation does not reside in any text whatsoever,
but in the cultivation of intelligence-of-the heart.
Then there is no longer anything occult or secret,
because the intention of the enlightened, the
prophets, and the "messengers from above" is
never to conceal - quite the contrary. […]
[Schwaller, Esoterism and Symbol, emphases,
mine]

There is an immediate psychic bond produced by belief in

rituals or lies of any kind. This "state of fusion" that Schwaller
describes is precisely the result of "bidding" as described in
Adventures Chapter 36, as experienced by Whitley
Strieber. There is an instantaneous linkage and
interpenetration with the individual who has chosen to believe
a lie. The higher-dimensional beings have subtle, vertical
filamental axes fixed on human beings. Those subtle nerve-
networks process radiant-energy values, drawn in through the
etheric "chakras" of the higher-dimensional systems,
represented by the pineal/pituitary glands.

The "contributions of consciousness" consist effectively of the

energy a soul would otherwise utilize to encompass objective
knowledge with reason. Each time they choose a lie over the
effort required to dig down to the truth, or the effort required
to adjust their own psyche to adapt to Truth, that "love"
energy is effectively transferred to the individual who is
producing the lie in which they are believing, without effort on
their part to ascertain its truth for themselves.

The subordinates of the negative hierarchy are all connected

like tiers of an immense structure, functioning as regimented
extensions and mind/body "parts" - organs and processes as
exactly described by Schwaller, serving the negative agenda
from their respective levels - feeding the Overarching Apex,
the "Eye of the Pyramid." The beings at the different tiers do
not perceive the object of the Ultimate Objective because it is
a characteristic of the Negative hierarchy to deliberately mask
and distort that which is higher and more comprehensive from
that which is lower and more "specialized." And this is why
they seek to "break up thought" into tiny packets, to shock the
senses, to generate emotional reactions that put the soul to
sleep.

The Negative hierarchy is oriented toward the consuming of

radiant light energy in a one way flow. The progressive power
that devolves from the "capture" and incorporation or radiant-
light sources serves to feed and enhance an exclusive
subjectivity of consciousness - the "identification" described by
Schwaller - since the effort is toward the subordination of all
things to the magnified narcissism belonging to devout ego
consciousness as represented by the much touted "Neters."

Those of you who have read the material in these pages,

especially the discussions of the nature of emotions, emotional
programming, addiction to emotion and brain chemicals, will
immediately recognize the sometimes not so subtle "twists" in
the above quoted passages. Schwaller is, effectively,
proposing that one should discover their "animal totem," or
"Neter," and activate it in all its primitive emotional glory. In
other words, rather that utilizing the mind that man is born
with that separates him from the animal kingdom to reach for
ever higher Cosmic Emotion via the use of reason and
reflection, one is supposed, instead, to turn back on the
example of Nature, and align oneself with the
"Cryptogeographic" beings of the animal kingdom, the the 4th
density STS hierarchy. In short, Schwaller is actively
promoting the negative agenda.

In contrast to what Schwaller has said about the "assimilating"

and expressing of animal natures as the "intelligence of the
heart" nonsense, the C's have suggested that one ought to
understand that it is by used of knowledge that we grow the
vessel for the higher emotions to manifest. We are, indeed, at
a crucial transition, but not one where we ought to believe
ourselves to be the acme of some sort of Darwinian
development of consciousness as a byproduct of evolution, but
rather that we are consciousness FIRST, which then manifests
form in order to gain experience and learn lessons.

The whole issue of the excitement over Egyptian civilization is

the belief that they had some power to control the forces of
life because they built the pyramids and we can't. And has it
never occurred to anybody that the existence of the pyramids
in conjunction with the worship of an elite group of human
beings, while everybody else was wearing loincloths and
sweating in the hot sun, might suggest a relationship between
the two? The fact is, the Egyptian civilization seems to have
been the chief example of a vast chasm between the haves
and the have nots, and they managed to do it longer than
anybody else. Indeed, it seems that these secret societies
want to promote that idea that so they can do it again. It's
that simple. And they are working like crazy to prepare the
minds of the public to accept this as a GOOD thing!

It would be a labor of Hercules to clean out the Augean stable

of this man's work, and there are minds who are attracted to
these concepts of elitism and hierarchy, just like an entire
town was convinced to agree that the Emperor was fully
clothed. R.A. Schwaller de Lubicz was a small-minded,
intellectual raider and poseur. He was prejudiced and
fanatical. He was a racist and a chauvinist. And this is the
man revered by most of the researchers in Alternative
Egyptology.

But here, again, we find the Tar Baby that will trap us.
Schwaller de Lubicz and others who say that the Sphinx was
built by people from Atlantis and is much older than
mainstream Egyptologists think, may be close to being right.
Schwaller de Lubicz and John Anthony West believe that the
erosion of the Sphinx was caused by a flood, or series of
floods, whereas Schoch found that it was caused by centuries
of exposure to rain. West and Hancock argue that the Sphinx
was built by a lost civilization, not by the ancient Egyptians. It
seems more likely that they were built by the remnants of a
Lost Civilization which was the beginning of the Egyptian
civilization which is far older than current Egyptological
experts will admit. P & P then make the biggest mistake of
all. They say:

We may think that we can accept [Saint-Yves] and Schwaller

de Lubicz’s historical ideas and reject the politics, but they
simply can’t be disentangled. It was never intended that they
should be. If you accept one, you are tacitly swallowing the
other.[5]

And that is the double barbed hook of disinformation. It is set

up so that the historical information will prove out to a
marvelous extent, so that the political ideas will be piggy-
backed on that proof. By the same token, P & P's frenzied
warning that it is a conspiracy will be discarded because they
are inextricably intertwined with the system that is presently
being deconstructed.

Since we have suggested that Schwaller de Lubicz is part of a

vast COINTELPRO operation with millennial objectives, we
need to consider here the fact that the very things he criticizes
about Fulcanelli may be those to which we ought to pay the
most attention, assuming that the reader is not reading this
book to discover the means of obtaining control over the
forces of life, but is rather seeking the Truth that will set man
Free.

Schwaller offers brutal criticism of Fulcanelli's cabalastic

exegesis in The Mystery of The Cathedrals. He denounces
Fulcanelli's clues that connect the French language to ancient
Pelasgian Greek which is vitally important as I have explicated
in Jupiter, Nostradamus, Edgar Cayce, and the Return of the
Mongols. He ridicules Fulcanelli's ideas of cabalistic
expression, the so-called "language of the birds." Schwaller
then promotes the very ideas of Fulcanelli as his own, having
effectively removed the mode of achieving them. He suggests
that what is required for cabalistic interpretation, for
intensified perception, celestial grace is what he calls the
intelligence of the heart which can only be achieved by
embracing one's "animal nature." He promotes this view
while criticizing Fulcanelli's academic expositions, claiming that
they are hopelessly over-etymologized, missing the point that
it is in these very studies that the cerebral connections are
established that enable amplified consciousness, and thus lay
the circuitry for the receiving of "celestial grace." Fulcanelli
writes in The Dwellings of The Philosophers

With their confused texts, sprinkled with cabalistic

 expressions, the books remain the efficient and
genuine cause of the gross mistake that we
indicate. For, in spite of the warnings... students
persisted in reading them according to the
meanings that they hold in ordinary language.
They do not know that these texts are reserved
for initiates, and that it is essential, in order to
understand them, to be in possession of their
secret key. One must first work at
discovering this key.[6]

And the key is in the language, in the variations of the myths,

in the archetypal expressions of the myths, and the words that
connect one myth to another in layers and semantic content.

[1] Picknett and Prince, The Rise of the Rough Beast, Adapted from a
lecture at the Saunière Society Symposium, Conway Hall, London

[2] Tacitus, The Life of Agricola, chapter 21.

[3] P & P lecture, op. cit.

[4] Schwaller de Lubicz, quoted by Andre Vandenbroeck in Breaking

Through, 1996, City Lights, 261 Columbus Ave, San Francisco,
CA94133, 1996

[5] P & P Lecture op. cit.

[6] Fulcanelli, Dwellings of the Philosophers, [Fulcanelli, 1964, 1999]

Archive Press
Schwaller de Lubicz and the
Fourth Reich Part II

Laura Knight-Jadczyk

In
examining
the work
of
Schwaller,
we have
one of
the better
examples
of the
subtle
way the
occult
societies
attack
those
who
come to bring light, by association and
co-opting. The tactic is to find a
means of subtly allying their message
with that of the truly Positive so as to
generate confusion in untrained minds
which would tend on surface evidence
to accept these actually contrary
messages as similar, at least in intent.

The occultists who are promoting the

new Control System borrow all their
components from what is of truth, and
proceed by the method of imitation.
They literally will ape the expression of
positive teachings, and all the more
carefully when they wish to be
mistaken altogether for purveyors of
truth, so as to subvert the messages.

Their usual strategy is to begin by

adhering so closely to the truth as to
be virtually indistinguishable to all but
heightened, thinking awareness. They
install their ideas through the rhythmic
lull of entrainment so as to catch the
"congregation" totally off guard when
they finally diverge slightly or greatly
from the truth and so pull the listener
along with them. The voice of
deception is, of course, all the more
ingratiatingly imitative of "goodness"
where it is addressing a listener who is
truly desirous of seeking truth; those
who are lazy to begin with don't need
such careful wording to deceive them
as they are already willing to be
deceived.

The most difficult problem we face is

that of the vast hyperdimensional
Cosmic COINTELPRO operation that
has been underway for millennia. We
have been blinded emotionally by
social programming, and kept in the
dark by academic limitations. To
compound the emotional and analytical
challenges we must overcome, there is
the present glut of unsubstantiated
information, theories, disinformation
and purported "evidence" being
promulgated through the Internet.
Lies and confusion everywhere. And
so few people seem to grasp that this
is an ingredient, or principle that is
part and parcel of the process of social
engineering. In order for any of us to
be able to arrive at any kind of
accurate information and to gain
greater insight about the problems we
may be facing, we must be prepared to
rid ourselves of all past thought
patterns and preconceptions, and in a
childlike manner ask very simple
questions, and keep asking until we
penetrate to new, novel and
unexpected revelations. There is no
other way; we must become Perceval
and "ask the question" with no beliefs
at all.
One does not need to even believe in a
conspiracy, but it is essential to
understand that there are many who
do believe, who do understand the
principles, and who do participate in
these conspiracies. In this respect, it
is necessary to investigate a full range
of information in order to avoid making
decisions based on blind emotional
faith, peer pressure, imagination or
outright manipulation.

It seems clear that it is only at the

very deepest level that some of the
human "players" are even aware of
their status as "game pieces." And
most certainly, they are assured that
their cooperation will be rewarded by
their hyperdimensional Masters. It is
fascinating to notice that, even though
they employ Machiavellian tactics and
Game Theory, they are curiously blind
to one of the rules of such play: those
who can be co-opted for use against
their own kind are the first to be
destroyed when the New "Prince" takes
over. Since their ambition leads them
to betrayal at one level, it is assumed
that it will also lead them to attempt
betrayal at the next level above them,
and thus they are used until they are
no longer useful, and then they are
destroyed.

Many people have the erroneous idea

that our national leaders and
lawmakers are this "economic elite."
That is evidently not the case. They
are merely gofers who serve a hidden
group of elitists who have seceded
from the human race and have joined
forces with the ultimate controllers:
the hyperdimensional Controllers of
the Matrix. This group is the one that
holds humanity in bondage while it
amasses wealth for the purpose of
gathering the reins of control in order
to be able to implement its Dark
Agenda of total control, body, mind
and spirit.
Teddy Roosevelt was quoted as saying:

"Behind the ostensible

government sits enthroned
an invisible government
owing no allegiance and
acknowledging no
responsibility to the
people. To destroy this
invisible government, to
befoul the unholy alliance
between corrupt business
and corrupt politics is the
first task of the
statesmanship of today."

The Third Reich was an early attempt

at creating a "New World Order."
Evidence shows that the Anglo
American economic elite was involved
with that up to its ears. Economist
Robert Brady defined the Nazi state as
"a dictatorship of monopoly
capitalism. Its 'fascism' is that of
business enterprise organized on a
monopoly basis, and in full command
of all the military, police, legal and
propaganda power of the
state." (Richard Sasuly, "I.G. Farben,"
1947, p. 128)

Nazi Germany was, in

effect, a Game Theory
based capitalist paradise.
There was a 60-hour
workweek, low wages and
no unions. Nazi
expansionist policies
actually represented the
global ambitions of
German cartels that had
begun to prepare for war
long before they backed
Hitler with big bux. As
countries fell to the Nazis,
businesses were absorbed
at fire sale prices. "For
German big business,
 World War II was a chance
to plunder on a scale
without precedent in
history," writes Sasuly
(p.114).

The key to understanding the elite,

and the direction of current world
events, based on the model of
Fascism, is to understand the
psychology of the economic cartel.
Cartels are, by definition, a
conspiracy. Their purpose - utilizing
Game Theory - is to defraud the
public by keeping prices high. They do
this by controlling competition,
markets, raw materials and new
technology. They are by definition
megalomaniacal, anti-national, and
psychopathic.

One of the earliest cartels was J. D.

Rockefeller's Standard Oil, which
eliminated the competition by secretly
fixing transportation costs with the
railroads. While he professed
Christianity, Rockefeller is famous for
saying the "only sin is competition."

The largest German cartel was the

chemical, film and pharmaceutical
giant I.G. Farben. Farben produced
85% of Germany's explosives in World
War Two. In 1926, Farben and
Standard Oil entered into a cartel
agreement in which Farben stayed out
of synthetic oil in return for Standard
representing Farben in the US. The
upshot of this agreement was that
Standard Oil supplied the Nazis with
petroleum in spite of shortages in the
US. It supplied a rare lead additive
without which the Luftwaffe could not
fly. It suppressed the production of
synthetic rubber in the US, which
almost cost the Allies the war.

In turn, Rockefeller, the man who

financed the scientific think tank at
Princeton, MIT, and other places, got a
cut of Farben's other business, which
included the many factories that
employed slave labor from
concentration camps like Auschwitz.
(Farben-Rockefeller paid the SS for
this labor at bargain rates.) Profits also
derived from the poison gas that killed
the laborers after their usefulness was
expended. This is the real reason the
rail lines to Auschwitz were not
bombed. Allied bombers hit within 14
miles of Auschwitz but the factories
and death camp were off limits. In
fact, German industry moved there for
this reason. After the war, the CIA
established its German headquarters
in the undamaged Farben skyscraper
in Frankfurt.

The holocaust was very good business.

Throughout the 1930's Wall Street
investment banks participated in
"aryanization" which meant getting
Jewish owned breweries, banks,
factories, department stores etc. for
30 cents on the dollar. The gold from
the teeth of holocaust victims ended
up in their vaults. It is not an
exaggeration to say that the Nazi war
effort was financed by the Bank of
England (which, for example,
transferred the Czech gold reserves to
the Nazis), Wall Street (Prescott Bush,
Dubya's grandfather, was one of the
leading Nazi financiers) and Jewish
plunder. It was finessed by lawyer
John Foster Dulles, a member of the
Council on Foreign Relations, who
later became US Secretary of State.
Nazi businessmen remained in
positions of power, war criminals were
transported to South America, or went
to work for the CIA.

In contrast, during the war, the allies

deliberately prevented Jews from
escaping from Europe. In short, they
not only set the house on fire, they
blocked the exit.
On the first day of World War Two, His
Majesty's ship "Lorna" fired on the
limping overcrowded "Tiger Hill" as she
approached Palestine with 1417
Jewish refugees. The first people killed
by the British in WWII were not
Germans but Jewish escapees from
Germany. Other refugee ships (e.g.
the "St. Louis") were sent back to
Germany by the US or blown up with
all souls on board by British MI-6 (the
"Struma"). For the whole story, read
The Holocaust Conspiracy (1989) by
William R. Perl, a Lt. Colonel with the
US Army Intelligence Service.

The list of US corporations that had

the equivalent of $8 billion invested in
Nazi Germany include Standard Oil,
General Motors, IBM, Ford, the Chase
and National City Banks, ITT and many
others. As a result, Allied soldiers
didn't know that ITT built the
airplanes that dropped bombs on
them. They didn't know that Ford and
General Motors built the Nazi's trucks
and tanks. They didn't know that ball
bearings crucial to the Nazi war effort
were manufactured in Philadelphia,
yet were in short supply in the USA.
This was all done with the knowledge
and permission of the US government.
For details, see Charles Higham's
Trading with the Enemy(1983), and
Christopher Simpson's (1993), and
Blowback (1988).

Most people assume that cartels owe

an allegiance to their native country.
But this is not the case. They live in a
financial virtual reality. Their fellow
men are important only insofar as
they cannon fodder for the
advancement of theirEconomic
interests.

The question must be asked: if the

Economic elite backed the Nazis, why
didn't the Nazis win? They did. It was
all about shifting the Control System to
another geographic location under
cover of war. The objective was to use
war and genocide to degrade and
demoralize humanity - specifically
those with ideas of Freedom - so that
they will ultimately accept serfdom
under the guidance of Uncle Sam and
Big Brother. The purpose of this
"globalization" was to institutionalize
the political power of the Economic
cartels. This was the hidden agenda
behind the creation of the scientific
"think tank" at Princeton, the luring of
the great scientific minds to the
service of the Economic cartels, the
development of Game Theory, and it is
all being implemented in the current
"war on terrorism."

At the levels of which we are aware:

heads of state, diplomats, government
officials, economic theorists, heads of
industry and the military; it is highly
unlikely that they have any full
awareness of the hyperdimensional
nature of the game at all. They
operate fully as "automatons," or
"psychopathic alien reaction
machines," in a state of total
susceptibility to manipulation with no
awareness that they are being
manipulated.

As Carlos Castaneda pointed out, the

Predator "gave us their mind.

Q: […] (L) Okay, this

anthropologist, Michael
Harner, was doing some
field work, and it says here
that Harner went to the
Peruvian Amazon to study
the culture of the Conibo
Indians. After a year or so
he had made little
headway in understanding
their religious system,
when the Conibo told him
'if he really wanted to
learn, he had to drink
ahayahuasca. Harner
accepted, not without fear
because the people had
warned him that the
experience was terrifying.
The following evening,
under the strict
supervision of his
indigenous friends, he
drank the equivalent of a
third of a bottle. After
several minutes he found
himself flying into a world
of true hallucinations.
After arriving in a celestial
cavern where a
supernatural carnival of
demons was in full swing,
he saw two strange boats
floating through the air
that combined to form a
huge dragon headed prow
not unlike that of a Viking
ship. On the deck he could
make out large numbers of
people with the heads of
bluejays and the bodies of
humans, not unlike the
bird-headed gods of
ancient Egyptian tomb
paintings. Then he saw
that his visions emanated
from giant reptilian
creatures that resided at
the lowest depths of his
brain. These creatures
began projecting scenes in
front of his eyes while
informing him that this
information was reserved
for the dying and the
dead.

'First, they showed me the

planet Earth as it was
aeons ago before there
was any life on it. I saw an
ocean, barren land, and a
bright blue sky. Then black
specks dropped from the
sky by the hundreds and
landed in front of me on
the barren landscape. I
could see that the specks
were actually large, shiny
black creatures with
stubby pterodactyl-like
wings and huge whale-like
bodies. They explained to
me in a kind of thought
language, that they were
fleeing from something
from out in space. They
had come to the planet
earth to escape their
enemy. The creatures then
showed me how they had
created life on the planet
in order to hide within the
multitudinous forms, and
thus disguise their
presence. Before me, the
magnificence of plant and
animal creation and
speciation and hundreds of
millions of years of
activity, took place on a
scale and with a vividness
impossible to describe. I
learned that dragon-like
creatures were thus inside
all forms of life, including
man.'

At this point in his

account, Harner writes in a
footnote at the bottom of
the page: 'in retrospect,
one could say that they
were almost like DNA,
although at that time, in
1961, I knew nothing of
DNA.' […] (C) In these
chemically induced
trances, why is there the
common experience of
seeing these bird-headed
or serpent-like creatures?
A: While you have
physicality, some part of
you will maintain the
connection to its roots.
Q: (L) Are you saying that
all these people who say
that human beings have
reptilian genetics, are
telling the truth? Do we
have reptilian genetics?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Do we also have
bird genetics?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) And that is our
physical connection or
basis?
A: Yes, as third density
bioengineered beings, you
lead the smorgasbord
parade of that which
surrounds you in the
physical realm.
Q: (A) So, we are 3rd
density bioengineered
beings. (L) That leads to
another question: there is
a lot of talk about the
Merovingian bloodlines, or
the 'Nordic Covenant'
bloodlines, or whatever
label is put on it, being a
'fresher' version of the
reptilian genetic strain.
This is represented in the
myths of the god Oannes
of Sumerian fame, or the
Quinotaur who
impregnated the mother of
Merovee while she was
bathing in the sea, and
even the wife of the
founder of the Angevins,
Melusine, variously
described as an aquatic
fairy or a mermaid. So,
there is this claim that
there is a stronger and
more virile reptilian strain
in these bloodlines. Is that
correct?
A: It may be.
Q: (L) Well, is that
significant in any way?
A: For those obsessed with
materialism.
Q: (L) […] this business
about these dragon-like
creatures fleeing from
something. This story gets
repeated a lot. Is that an
accurate part of the tale?
Were they fleeing from
something?
A: Maybe, but so what?
Q: (L) What were they
fleeing? I'm curious!
A: Fleeing? All life just fills
the voids that exist. It is a
natural process;
existentialism.

08-28-99
Q: I have this book, this
Marcia Schafer thing:
"Confessions of an
Intergalactic
Anthropologist," and its
a bunch of channelled
stuff; one thing she says:
"the snake is associated
with the sign of wisdom
and higher learning, and is
often regarded quite
highly in mystical circles."
She had an interaction
with a rattlesnake, for
which she felt sympathy,
and she also has
sympathetic interactions
with Lizzies. I would like to
have a comment on the
idea of the snake as a
"sign of wisdom and
higher learning." Does
this, in fact, represent
what the snake
symbolizes?
A: Snake is/was reported
in context of the viewpoint
of the observer.
Q: Are you saying that
when the observer's
viewpoint is that the snake
is a symbol of higher
learning, maybe...
A: Maybe the observer
was just "blown away" by
the experience.
Q: Clarify, please.
A: If you were living in the
desert, or jungle, about
7,000 years ago, as you
measure time, would you
not be impressed if these
Reptoid "dudes" came
down from the heavens in
silvery objects and
demonstrated techno-
wonders from thousands
of years in the future, and
taught you calculus,
geometry and astrophysics
to boot?!?
Q: Is that, in fact, what
happened?
A: Yup.

08-09-97
A: {…]. Here is something
for you to digest: Why is it
that your scientists have
overlooked the obvious
when they insist that alien
beings cannot travel to
earth from a distant
system???
Q: And what is this
obvious thing?
A: Even if speed of light
travel, or "faster," were
not possible, and it is, of
course, there is no reason
why an alien race could
not construct a space
"ark," living for many
generations on it. They
could travel great
distances through time
and space, looking for a
suitable world for
conquest. Upon finding
such, they could then
install this ark in a distant
orbit, build bases upon
various solid planes in that
solar system, and proceed
to patiently manipulate the
chosen civilizations to
develop a suitable
technological
infrastructure. And then,
after the instituting of a
long, slow, and grand
mind programming
project, simply step in and
take it over once the
situation was suitable.
Q: Is this, in fact, what
has happened, or is
happening?
A: It could well be, and
maybe now it is the time
for you to learn about the
details.
Q: Well, would such a race
be 3rd or 4th density in
orientation?
A: Why not elements of
both?
Q: What is the most likely
place that such a race
would have originated
from?
A: Oh, maybe Orion, for
example?
Q: Okay. If such a race
did, in fact, travel to this
location in space/time,
how many generations
have come and gone on
their space ark during this
period of travel, assuming,
of course, that such a
thing has happened?
A: Maybe 12.
Q: Okay, that implies that
they have rather extended
life spans...
A: Yes...
Q: Assuming this to be the
case, what are their
lifespans?
A: 2,000 of your years.
When in space, that is...
Q: And what is the span
when on terra firma?
A: 800 years.
Q: Well, has it not
occurred to them that
staying in space might not
be better?
A: No. Planets are much
more "comfortable."
Q: Okay... imagining that
such a group has traveled
here...
A: We told you of
upcoming conflicts...
Maybe we meant the same
as your Bible, and other
references. Speak of... The
"final" battle between
"good and evil..." Sounds
a bit cosmic, when you
think of it, does it not?
Q: Does this mean that
there is more than one
group that has traveled
here in their space arks?
A: Could well be another
approaching, as well as
"reinforcements" for either/
or, as well as non-
involved, but interested
observers of various types
who appreciate history
from the sidelines.
Q: Well, SWELL! There
goes my peaceful life!
A: You never had one!
Q: Well, I was planning on
one! Is this one of those
items we should NOT put
on the net, or are you
addressing it because you
want it on the net?
A: We will leave that until
a bit later.
Q: Any other comment?
A: You chose to be
incarnated now, with some
foreknowledge of what
was to come. Reference
your dreams of space
attack.
Q: Okay, what racial types
are we talking about
relating to these
hypothetical aliens?
A: Three basic constructs.
Nordic, Reptilian, and
Greys. Many variations of
type 3, and 3 variations of
type 1 and 2.
Q: Well, what racial types
are the 'good guys?'
A: Nordics, in affiliation
with 6th density "guides."
Q: And that's the only
good guys?
A: That's all you need.
Q: Wonderful! So, if it is a
Grey or Lizzie, you know
they aren't the nice guys.
But, if it is tall and blond,
you need to ask questions!
A: All is subjective when it
comes to nice and not
nice. Some on 2nd density
would think of you as "not
nice," to say the least!!!
Q: That's for sure!
Especially the roaches!
Maybe we ought to get in
touch with some of these
good guys...
A: When the "time" is
right.
[…]
A: Invasion happens when
programming is
complete...
Q: What programming?
A: See Bible, "Lucid" book,
Matrix Material, "Bringers
of the Dawn," and many
other sources, then cross
reference...
Q: Well, if something is
fairly imminent, we are
not gonna have time to do
all the things you have
suggested that we do!
A: Yes you will, most
likely.
Q: Well, we are supposed
to build a pool, a maze, a
psychomantium, to build a
database, get a Nobel
Prize... a LOT of things in
the works here.... This just
sort of takes the heart
right out of me!
A: Not so!
Q: Well, are we going to
have time to do all these
things?
A: All these things were
suggested for this reason,
among others.
Q: So, all the things you
have suggested are to get
us ready for this event?
A: Yes.
Q: Well, we better get
moving! We don't have
time to mess around!
A: You will proceed as
needed, you cannot force
these events or alter the
Grand Destiny.
Q: I do NOT like the sound
of that! I want to go
home!
A: The alternative is less
appetising.
Q: Sure! I don't want to be
lunch!
A: Reincarnation on a 3rd
density earth as a "cave
person" amidst rubble and
a glowing red sky, as the
perpetual cold wind
whistles...
Q: Why is the sky glowing
red?
A: Contemplate.
Q: Of course! Comet dust!
Sure, everybody knows
THAT! Wonderful!!!
Anything further?
A: Stay tuned for all
pertinent information.

11-06-94
Q: (L) I have drawn a sort
of conclusion about some
of the activities of the
Lizzies and their
abductions through the
Grays and so forth, and it
seems to me that these
excessive numbers of
exams, gynecological,
reproductive or whatever
exams, might possibly be
a screen for a process that
is used to extract life force
or energy from the human
being, through the basal
chakra, the sexual chakra,
as I understand where the
life force enters in. Is this
idea correct or on track?
A: Close.
Q: (L) It does seem that
the Grays and Lizzies are
abnormally interested in
sexual activities of human
beings, is that correct?
A: Yes.
[…]
Q: (L) Do they have
tremendous sex drives
even though they are in
fourth density?
A: No.
Q: (L) Are they interested
in sexual energy simply
because it is life force?
A: Partly and also
desperately to stave off
change in order to retain
control.
Q: (L) What changes are
they desperate to stave
off?
A: To 4th level.
Q: (L) They are trying to
stave off the 4th level
change. Can they do that?
A: No. Also hoping to
retain control even if
change occurs.
[…]
Q: (L) Are these supposed
memories people have
from their abductions of
these exams just screens
of procedures used to take
life force from them?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) When they sample
an abductee's tissue and
take the little scoops or
chunks out of them, what
do they take these chunks
of flesh for?
A: Cloning.
Q: (L) If they clone, why
do they need such a large
chunks?
A: You don't know all
details of cloning process
yet.
Q: (L) Do they take twins,
or one of a pair of twins,
and raise one artificially?
A: Have done so.
Q: (L) Is this done
frequently?
A: No.
Q: (L) What is the purpose
of taking one of a pair of
twins?
A: Study to determine
which is best soul
receptacle: one of twins or
clone. [This raises the
question as to why the
choice has to be either. Is
there some connection
between clones and the
original body and one twin
and another that is vital to
the purpose of the
Lizzies?]
Q: (L) Do these twins they
raise, do they raise them
on their ships or in their
enclave wherever they
are?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) And do they treat
them well?
A: Open.
Q: (L) Do they teach them
a great deal?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Do they do this to
test the brain capacity of
the human being?
A: And other reasons.
Q: (L) For what purpose
are they trying to decide
which is the best
receptacle, the clone or
the twin? Receptacle for
what?
A: Future project. [to]
Switch physical realities.
Q: (L) And who is going to
switch physical realities?
Are they going to enter
into bodies they have
prepared for themselves
so that they can switch
their reality?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) So, they are
preparing a bunch of
soulless bodies into which
they can enter in
themselves?
A: Will try.

04-15-00
Q: (L) So, in effect, we
ARE the new Neanderthals
on the eve of extinction.
You have said that those
who transition into 4th
density in the body will go
through some kind of
rejuvenation process or
body regeneration or
something. Does that
mean that these present
"Neanderthal" type bodies
that we presently occupy
will morph into something
more in line with the new
model? Is it genetically
encoded into some of
them to do so?
A: Something like that.
Q: (L) So, that's why they
have been following
certain bloodlines for
generation after
generation; they are
tinkering with the DNA and
arming genetic time-
bombs that are waiting to
go off. (A) What is
interesting is how do those
who are trying to get
these people, to abduct
them, how do they spot
them? How do they get
the information? By
following the bloodline, or
by some kind of monitor
you can detect from a long
distance - and they can
note that "here is
somebody of interest" or
"here is somebody
dangerous" or "let's
abduct this one" or
whatever. How do they
select? Do they search the
genealogies or is it some
kind of remote sensing?
A: Now this is interesting
Arkadiusz, as it involves
the atomic "signature" of
the cellular structure of
the individual. In concert
with this is the etheric
body reading and the
frequency resonance
vibration. All these are
interconnected, and can be
read from a distance using
remote viewing technology/
methodology.
Q: (L) Can it be done in a
pure mechanical way
without using psychic
means?
A: At another level of
understanding, the two are
blended into one.
Q: (T) Computerized
psychic remote viewing,
maybe. Like artificial
intelligence. Maybe a mind
connected to a computer?
A: That is close, yes.

07-22-00
A: The concept of a
"master race" put forward
by the Nazis was merely a
4th density STS effort to
create a physical vehicle
with the correct frequency
resonance vibration for 4th
density STS souls to
occupy in 3rd density. It
was also a "trial run" for
planned events in what
you perceive to be your
future.
Q: (L) You mean with a
strong STS frequency so
they can have a "vehicle"
in 3rd density, so to speak?
A: Correct. Frequency
resonance vibration! Very
important.
Q: (L) So, that is why they
are programming and
experimenting? And all
these folks running around
who some think are
"programmed," could be
individuals who are raising
their nastiness levels high
enough to accommodate
the truly negative STS 4th
density - sort of like walk-
ins or something, only not
nice ones?
A: You do not have very
many of those present yet,
but that was, and still is,
the plan of some of the
4th density STS types.

08-05-00
Q: Okay, last session you
brought up the subject of
Frequency Resonance
Vibration. You suggested
that there are certain STS
forces who are developing
or creating or managing
physical bodies that they
are trying to increase the
frequency in so that they
will have bodies that are
wired so that they can
manifest directly into 3rd
density, since that seems
to be the real barrier that
prevents an all-out
invasion, the fact that we
are in 3rd density and they
are in 4th. Now, I assume
that the same function
could be true for STO
individuals. It seems that
many individuals who have
come into this time period
from the future, coming
back into the past via the
incarnational cycle so as
not to violate free will,
have carefully selected
bodies with particular
DNA, which they are, little
by little, activating so that
there 4th density selves,
or higher, can manifest in
this reality. Is it possible
for those energies to
manifest into such bodies
which have been
awakened or tuned in 3rd
density?
A: STO tends to do the
process within the natural
flow of things. STS seeks
to alter creation processes
to fit their ends.
Q: This Top Secret
document and the Anna
Hayes material to some
extent, both talk about
many abductions being
"ourselves from the
future" who have come
back to the past, or what
is for us, the present, to
abduct their own bodies to
make genetic adjustments
so that they can advance
and not make the
mistakes they made in
another timeline. Is that,
in fact, part of the
scenario?
A: Very close to the truth!
Q: Can you abduct
yourself in an STO manner
and help yourself in this
way? Can that be STO?
A: It is not, because that
is not STO.
Q: So, when that is
happening, and if it is
happening, it is occurring
in the STS parameter?
A: Yes.
Q: How do the STO
manage?
A: They do not concern
themselves with such
things.
Q: Well, if the STS guys
are genetically tweaking
themselves to have some
kind of different outcome
for some reason that we
do not perceive, don't you
think there should be a
balancing action on the
STO side of some sort?
A: You are thinking in STS
terms. But that is natural,
since human 3rd density is
STS.
Q: You say they don't
concern themselves with
that. What do STO
individuals coming back
from the future into the
past concern themselves
with?
A: Answering calls for
assistance with knowledge.
Q: What do these STS
individuals coming back
into the past hope to do by
genetically tweaking their
ancestors? What happened
that they want to have
happen differently?
A: Infinite number of
possible answers to that
question.
Q: So, they are coming
from all different timelines
with all different kinds of
agendas - all designed to
serve themselves.

11-26-94
Q: (L) You have told us
through this source, that
there is a cluster of
comets connected in some
interactive way with our
solar system, and that this
cluster of comets comes
into the plane of the
ecliptic every 3600 years.
Is this correct?
A: Yes. But, this time it is
riding realm border wave
to 4th level, where all
realities are different.
Q: (L) Okay, so the cluster
of comets is riding the
realm border wave. Does
this mean that when it
comes into the solar
system, that its effect on
the solar system, or the
planets within the solar
system… (J) Or us. (L)…
may or may not be
mitigated by the fact of
this transition? Is this a
mitigating factor?
A: Will be mitigated.
[…]
Q: (L) Does any of this
mean that the earth
changes that have been
predicted, may not, in
fact, occur in physical
reality as we understand
it?
A: You betcha.
Q: (L) Does this mean that
all of this running around
and hopping and jumping
to go here and go there
and do this and do that
is...
A: That is strictly 3rd level
thinking.
Q: (L) Now, if that is 3rd
level thinking, and if a lot
of these things are
symbolic, I am assuming
they are symbolic of
movement or changes in
energy.
A: Yes.
Q: (L) And, if these
changes in energy occur
does this mean that the
population of the planet
are, perhaps, in groups or
special masses of groups,
are they defined as the
energies that are changing
in these descriptions of
events and happenings of
great cataclysm. Is it like
a cataclysm of the soul on
an individual and or
collective basis?
A: Close.
Q: (L) When the energy
changes to 4th density,
and you have already told
us that people who are
moving to 4th density
when the transition
occurs, that they will move
into 4th density, go
through some kind of
rejuvenation process, grow
new teeth, or whatever,
what happens to those
people who are not
moving to 4th density, and
who are totally unaware of
it? Are they taken along on
the wave by, in other
words, piggy-backed by
the ones who are aware
and already changing in
frequency, or are they
going to be somewhere
else doing something else?
A: Step by step.
Q: (T) In other words, we
are looking at the fact that
what's coming this time is
a wave that's going to
allow the human race to
move to 4th density?
A: And the planet and your
entire sector of space/
time.

Q: (T) Is that what this

whole plan is about, then,
if I may be so bold as to
include all of us here in
this. We, of the beings of
light who have come here
into human form, to
anchor the frequency, is
this what we are anchoring
it for, for this wave, so
that when it comes
enough of us will be ready,
the frequency will be set,
so that the change in the
planet can take place as it
has been planned?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) When this happens,
will we piggy-back all
those who are still
unaware?
A: Open.
Q: (T) Okay, when the
people are talking about
the earth changes, when
they talk in literal terms
about the survivors, and
those who are not going to
survive, and the
destruction and so forth
and so on, in 3rd, 4th, 5th
level reality we are not
talking about the
destruction of the planet
on 3rd level physical
terms, or the loss of 90
per cent of the population
on the 3rd level because
they died, but because
they are going to move to
4th level?
A: Whoa! You are getting
"warm."
Q: (T) Okay. So, when
they talk about 90 per
cent of the population not
surviving, it is not that
they are going to die, but
that they are going to
transform. We are going to
go up a level. This is what
the whole light thing is all
about?
A: Or another possibility is
that the physical
cataclysms will occur only
for those "left behind" on
the remaining 3rd level
density earth.
[…]
Q: (L) What I am trying to
get here, once again, old
practical Laura, is trying to
get a handle on practical
terms here. Does this
mean that a 4th density
earth and a 3rd density
earth will coexist side by
side...
A: Not side by side, totally
different realms.
Q: (L) Do these realms
interpenetrate one another
but in different
dimensions...
A: Close.
Q: (L) So, in other words,
 a being from say, 6th
density, could look at this
planet we call the earth
and see it spinning
through space and see
several dimensions of
earth, and yet the point of
space/time occupation is
the same, in other words,
simultaneous. (J) They can
look down but we can't
look up.
A: Yes.
Q: (L) So, in other words,
while all of this
cataclysmic activity is
happening on the 3rd
dimensional earth, we will
be just on our 4th
dimensional earth and this
sort of thing won't be
there, and we won't see
the 3rd dimensional people
and they won't see us
because we will be in
different densities which
are not "en rapport", so to
speak?
A: You understand
concept, now you must
decide if it is factual.

Here on the Cassiopaea Website, we

echo the above sentiment. We do not
seek to force any idea down anyone's
throat, or even declare that the C's
ideas are right, or the only right
views. What we have done is use
these ideas as a jumping off point for
thinking, creating a hypothesis, testing
this hypothesis, and even
experimenting with it.

If it is true that humans are being bred

and raised like cattle in a global
stockyard and fed upon both
psychically and sometimes even
physically, we have a truly serious
situation going on here, to put it
mildly. As I have explained before, I
have NEVER seen a Drachomonoid
being except in dreamlike states or
almost hypnopompic semi-sleep
states. So, when the Cassiopaeans
began to talk about them, it was truly
"Twilight Zone" time, in my opinion!

I have also stated that, whenever the

Cassiopaeans have told us anything, I
work very hard to discover if there is
any form of what I call vertical or
lateral corroboration. Vertical data is
that which is located in history at any
point different from the present.
Lateral data consists of collecting
reports, witness information, and other
data that amounts to circumstantial
evidence from the present time. It is
always better if the two types of data
"cross" or intersect. But it is still not
the same as having a "smoking gun."
But, when you are dealing with
hyperdimensional realities, "smoking
guns" are not very likely to be found.

In the case of the idea of man being

"food" for hyperdimensional beings,
there is an enormous amount of both
vertical and lateral corroboration of
ALL kinds. So much so that, in fact, it
is almost impossible to understand
why it is not generally known. Clearly,
there have been deliberate efforts to
"hide this fact." And, the fact that it is
hidden may itself tell us something.

The point is, when Don Juan and

Gurdjieff and the Cassiopaeans (and
others) tell us that our religions, our
social structure, our values, our beliefs
about our spiritual nature and
condition have been deliberately
created to perpetuate the illusion that
we are free; that we are (or can be)
"special and adored children of a loving
God;" that we are or can be "co-
creators" with God, that we can DO
anything at all of a positive and
powerful nature, we need to carefully
examine this issue!
But it is WORK to examine it
objectively. It is HARD WORK because
it consists of long and difficult self-
examination in order to be able to
overcome the emotions that prevent
us from discovering what illusions we
are hanging onto, what illusions are
preventing us from seeing and acting
in such a way as to BECOME FREE.

For me, the idea of connecting the dots

has always consisted of using
everything available to me in terms of
peeling that blasted onion right down
to the center. If I have to spend weeks
buried in books about genetics to
verify or disprove something the
Cassiopaeans have said, I will do it.
Not only that, I will write to known
experts in the field using my husband's
cachet in the scientific world to "get in
the door" and get the latest, most up-
to-date INSIDE information so that I
can be sure that what I am sharing is
as accurate and balanced as I can
make it.

When we sit in our comfortable homes

and look at our reality, including that
which is outside our windows, we see a
"stable" front. Cars pass on the street
taking people to and from their homes
in their varied daily activities. The sun
shines, children pass by talking and
laughing. Everyone is involved in their
life in an immediate and identified
way, believing that this life they are
involved in is what IS.

But, once in a while, something bizarre

happens to someone and they struggle
to deal with this anomaly in the space/
time continuum. Usually, it is
sufficiently minor that they can "damp
it" and forget about it; which they
MUST because it is too aberrant in the
normal accepted course of events. It
must be shoved under the rug and
hidden.

Once in awhile, bigger things happen

in the reality - evidence of the
hyperdimensional control system
intrudes, or the "screen" breaks down
in some way - and it becomes news
and gets reported. Charles Fort spent
many years collecting these types of
things from the newspapers and
magazines all over the world.

When this happens, the "accepted

belief system" hurries to "damp down"
the item so that everyone can go along
in their respective and collective
illusions. And, since the events are
localized, it is easy to cover it up. And,
in the past, this was a LOT easier than
it is today.

When you read the collected

information of Charles Fort, you see
that the "alien reality" that is so widely
reported today was just as active then
as it is now. In fact, you see that it
may even be somewhat "cyclical." Just
as we have cycles of food production,
planting, growing and harvesting, so
may hyperdimensional beings harvest
us according to some "seasonal" rule.

But, in any event, in the past it was a

lot easier to keep the lid on the
matter. But then, people began to
become literate. Books and papers and
magazines were published and
distributed. Travel became easier and
information from around the world
about these "odd intrusions" into our
reality could be collected giving an
overall pattern that something was not
right.

Before Charles Fort, there were some

few people who already "smelled a
rat." But, Mr. Fort kindly shoved it
right under our noses and the reaction
has been quite interesting. The "cover
up" machine went into FULL operation
through the most effective vectors of
mainstream science and religion.

But, the rat had been smelled and

some people couldn't just shove it
back under the rug. The stench kept
wafting in the window that had been
opened.

And so, certain people began to start

searching for the source of this stinky
rat. They began to gather knowledge
and information.

At that point, the Control System had

to use other options. It is obvious
that, on the one hand, the creation of
a technological infrastructure was
desirable for a future takeover, but on
the other hand, it was necessary to
rigidly control it. We can even note
HOW the "cover-up" machine began to
do this "damage control." When you
study the history of social and religious
movement and change, you can see
the "control mechanism" morphing
with every discovery or realization
made by human beings. As they
outgrew the old religions, the simplistic
explanations, new "religions" were put
in place. At exactly the right time - the
period of scientific expansion and
growing knowledge of the nature of
reality which brought the old religious
views into serious question - the whole
spiritualist movement began, leading
to channeled information that was
designed to patch up the holes in the
control net. Newer and more elaborate
explanations of the "higher realms"
came into our reality. And, with each
new question, the control system had
a new answer to help everybody calm
down, relax, and stop asking
questions!

At the present time, this is even more

amazingly evident. A few years ago,
when we first began sharing the
Cassiopaean information, many of the
issues we dealt with were not even
addressed by these other "sources."
But, with everything we release, the
"other side" brings some new
candidate forward with new
explanations to "patch the holes" we
are tearing in the fabric of reality. And,
of course, some of these new sources
are becoming more educated and
articulate as if to counterbalance and
damp down what we are presenting
here.

To many of you, it may seem that the

Cassiopaeans offer nothing but
repeated statements that we are
"damned no matter what we do," but,
that is not entirely the case. Yes, it is
true that, up to this point I have
presented mostly the information that
relates to these matters, attempting to
penetrate and tear the veils of illusion
under which mankind has been hidden
from his higher nature or potential, but
this has only been done with the
intention of having a relatively clear
view of what possibilities of DOing we
may actually have. And, I have been
trying to accomplish something else,
something deep and essential: for
those who are asking, I have been
trying to help you find your Free Will
by describing the the situations in
which we are deprived of our free will
by the manipulations of others.

And this brings us to that all-important

remark made by a member of our
group, Terry Rodemerk:

What we have been told on that is that

this universe was created as a Free
Will Universe. It was created
specifically to allow all souls to do
whatever they wish to do; they have
complete choice about what they wish
to do. The Grays, the Lizards, whoever
they are who abduct and put implants
in people, have the right to do that
because it's their free will to come
here and do that to us. And, they have
the right to tell us whatever they want
to tell us to rationalize their behavior.
Our right is to NOT believe what
abducting entities tell us. We have free
will to believe or not believe them. If
they tell us in one lifetime that they
have the right to do this to us, and we
choose to believe them then, and then,
in this lifetime, they try the same
tricks and we choose NOT to believe
them, in each case, we are exercising
our free will and so are they. This is a
Free Will universe. We can change our
mind. They are trying to convince us
that we have no choice in that;
whether we believe them or not is OUR
choice.

Can we accelerate the awakening?

The Cassiopaeans have indicated that,

yes it is possible:

Q: (L) Is there a tool that

enhances free will?
A: No tool is needed
because all there is is
lessons. The learning cycle
is variable, and progress
along it is determined by
events and circumstances
as they unfold.
Q: (L) So, when a person
is being hypnotized and
controlled from outside,
because that is the matter
of concern we were
discussing earlier, they are
hypnotized and controlled
until they learn to stop it?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) So, using the
analogy of the pig sty,
they just have to wallow in
it and suffer until they
have had enough?
 A: Using your analogy of
the bicycle: Is there a tool
which makes it
unnecessary for the child
to learn how to ride the
bicycle in order to know
how to ride it?!?
Q: (MM) Don't you get
more free will by
assimilating knowledge?
A: Yes!! Yes!!
Q: (L) So, in other words,
knowledge and awareness
makes you aware that you
have free will, and also
makes you aware of what
actions actually ARE acts
of free will, and therefore,
when you know or suspect
the difference between the
lies and deception and
truth, then you are in a
position to be in control of
your life?
A: Yes. Remember, you
learn on an exponential
curve, once you have
become "tuned in." This
means that you become
increasingly able to access
the universal
consciousness. Please
learn to trust your
increasing awareness. All
who are present here are
at one point or another on
that cycle of progression,
some further along than
others. If you properly
network without prejudice,
you may all wind up at the
same point on this cycle.

So, learning, networking with others

who are further along on the cycle of
progression, and doing this without
prejudice CAN make a difference, it
seems.

And it is this process that the Control

System most desperately wishes to
halt. As long as we were just chatting
with the C's in the comfort of our
home, as long as we were just sharing
it with a few people on a private basis,
or not too much of it, we were getting
along fine. But the minute the website
went up, that was when the
concentration of attack against the
sharing of this information began. The
instant we began to set up a serious
website, investing time and money and
energy into it in a dedicated way, Mr.
Maynerd Most was activated to
infiltrate, co-opt, steal, bastardize, and/
or destroy.

We have learned in Adventures

Chapter 36, the objective in The Secret
Games of the Gods: it is nothing less
than the total capture of our planet,
and the use of human beings as
servants and "food" in ways that are
not even comprehensible to us.
Considering the "payoff" that is being
sought by these forces, we can be
certain that the deceptions will be deep
and wide, and far reaching. As we
have seen, the beginnings of this
global manipulation began millennia
ago, and it is in the present day that it
is intended to be brought to fruition.
Unfortunately, after so long a time of
being subjected to lies and
disinformation, the likelihood of
humanity being able to overcome the
social and cultural programming is
remote. And that is where people like
Maynerd Most AKA "Dr. Evil," and
other psychopaths come in: they are
masters of triggering emotional
programs that put people back to
sleep. As a student on the subject,
Robert Canup, has said, 99% of all of
the problems confronting mankind can
be traced to a single cause: the
problem of the plausible lie. And the
plausible lie is what psychopaths are
masters at promulgating. Even though
he was writing in strictly material and
cultural terms, his ideas are presented
almost intact with only the context and
objects changed. Thus adapting
Canup's reasoning to our present
problem - that of psychopaths - let's
look at how psychopaths are the ideal
"agents of the Matrix."

Plausible lies are monstrous things

constructed by the Matrix Control
System, propagated by evil people for
the express purpose of deceiving good
people into doing the will of the Dark
Forces. It's that simple. The most
powerful of these lies are so plausible
that nobody even dreams about
questioning their validity.

If there is such a thing as a plausible

lie, is it not also possible that there
might be such a thing as an
implausible truth?

Adapting Canup's example: Suppose

that tomorrow when you walk out of
your house, an alien spacecraft lands
in front of you. Aliens get out and
assault you, leaving physical traces.
Next, imagine that this is not a
hallucination, it is not dream; it really
happens. You are now in possession of
an implausible truth. What chance is
there of you being able to convince
anyone else of what happened to you?
You know it is the truth, but no one
will believe you. And the root of the
problem is the fact that truth generally
has a feeling of reality to it. However,
that feeling of reality which makes
truth generally plausible is NOT the
same thing as the truth itself. Others
who have not experienced aliens
landing and assaulting them do not
have the same feeling of reality about
what you are telling them. If everyone
else had experienced a similar event,
with the attendant feeling of reality,
the truth of that event would be
accepted immediately.
In short, people believe what is
"familiar," or what is part of a careful,
long term program of familiarization of
lies that become plausible simply
because they are familiar.

When science first discovered that

solid matter was mostly empty space,
many people reacted to this truth -
this unfamiliar fact of our reality - with
outrage. Debates over the "solidity" of
matter and "kicking rocks" raged for
years. It took a very long time, and a
lot of work to gradually make others
aware of this truth in order to make
this "implausible" fact part of our
awareness.

Much of what we are reporting on this

Website is implausible to many people.
It is unfamiliar, for the most part, even
though there is a lot of evidence
presented to support it. We
understand that and realize that any
new concepts will have a feeling of
implausibility to it until it becomes
familiar enough to be accepted
(assuming it is also checked and
tested). Were a new conception of
reality to be instantly familiar it would
be of very limited value; it would have
covered very little new ground. We
have, however, presented a great deal
of evidence that the material we are
publishing has been available for a
very long time to very small, very
secret esoteric groups, and we are
only now making it practically available
to humanity at large.

Thousands of years ago the idea of

civilization was promulgated by forces
who claimed to be setting up a system
so that people would "get what they
deserved." Now, just think about that
for a moment. Imagine that you are an
evil being. You would realize that if
you really set up a system where
people got what they really deserved,
you, yourself, would be instantly
rejected - out the door in an instant.
But if you are not just evil, but cunning
also, you will do everything in your
power to insure that you and your kind
are in charge of setting up that
system, and that you remain in charge
of it. You would make certain that evil
was blended into the social and
cultural concepts so seamlessly that
nobody would ever notice.

This is exactly what happened. The

forces of the Matrix Control System
were deeply involved in the formation
of our cultural and social norms,
including our legal system.

In the earliest days of this "legal

system," there was a form of "justice"
called trial by ordeal. An example of
trial by ordeal was holding a red hot
iron to a defendant's tongue. The
plausible lie used to justify this
behavior was: if the defendant was
telling a lie they would have a dry
mouth and would be burned by the
iron - while a truthful person would
have a moist mouth and would be
protected. The implausible,
unbelievable truth is that the people
who thought that up simply enjoyed
holding red hot pokers on peoples
tongues! Our current legal system is
descended from such minds - it is
much more clever and simply not as
obviously evil as that one was.

Suppose that you are on a team that is

engaged in a game and you discover
that:

* The other team gets to

make up the rules.
* The referee plays for the
other team.
* One of the rules is that
you are not allowed to
score - the other team is
 at no risk - only you can
be scored against. [Canup]

That is precisely how our social,

cultural, and legal systems operate.
The conditions of our world are
designed to create the maximum
chance that evil will prevail and the
good people will be punished by being
good and telling the truth.

Punishing good people involves more

than just creating a social system that
acts against them. The system is
designed to insure that these good
people are subjected to as much pain
as possible for the simple fact of being
good and honest. An obvious example
of punishing the innocent may be
found in the way the victim in a rape
case is treated; their reputations are
dragged through the dirt - all in the
name of justice of course. A specific
example of this is the action of
Maynerd Most and Frank Scott
regarding that extremely painful
episode in my own past described
elsewhere on the site here, using the
threat of "exposure," and dragging my
reputation through the dirt to force me
to remove the Foundation Report
about Most from the web. I refused to
be blackmailed, I refused to be
intimidated. And Lord! they have been
determined to see us suffer! For weeks
after that blackmail attempt, Most
tried daily - sometimes 3, 4 or 5 times
a day - to post horrible accusations on
our public message board suggesting
that I was somehow guilty of a crime
because I did not go back to see if my
attacker - the man who had nearly
killed me - was "okay." And because
we regularly deleted or blocked these
posts, he claims that we do not
tolerate "dissent" and are therefore a
"cult." Never have I seen a more
typical series of "plausible lies" put
together by a psychopath who clearly
had no conception of the emotion, the
fear and terror and condition of being
in extremis that any normal woman
would experience under such
circumstances. There was never a
clearer example of the fact that the
psychopath has no emotions, and
therefore cannot imagine the emotions
of those who do have them. He was,
effectively, blaming me for resisting
being raped and strangled. And
millions of other women are treated
similarly by the legal and social system
in control of our world.

The system that controls our thinking

is set up like the legal system. People
are taught to assume that, in any
conflict, one side is lying one way, and
the other is lying the other, and people
can just form opinions about which
side is telling the truth. They are
taught that the truth will lie
somewhere between two extremes.

That is a wonderfully plausible lie.

Canup suggests that, to see the evil

behind that plausible lie, we must
make a different assumption: let us
assume that in such cases, one side is
innocent, honest, and tells the truth. It
is obvious that lying does an innocent
defendant no good; what lie can he
tell? If he is innocent, the only lie he
can tell is to falsely confess "I did it."

But lying is nothing but good for the

liar. He can declare that "I didn't do
it," and accuse another of doing it, all
the while the innocent person is saying
"I didn't do it," and is telling the truth.

The truth - when twisted by good liars,

can always make an innocent person
look bad - especially if he is honest
and admits that he has faults. If
someone is telling the simple truth,
and the other side is lying through
their teeth, the basic assumption that
the truth lies between the testimony of
the two sides always shifts the
advantage to the lying side and away
from the side telling the truth. Under
most circumstances, this shift put
together with the fact that the truth is
going to also be twisted in such a way
as to bring detriment to the innocent
person, results in the advantage
always resting in the hands of evil.

Canup points out that, even the simple

act of giving testimony under oath is
useless. If a person is a liar, swearing
an oath means nothing to that person.
However, swearing an oath acts
strongly on a serious, truthful witness.
Again, the advantage is placed on the
side of the Dark Forces.

Proof is a familiar concept to those

used to conventional logical thinking.
However what passes for proof in
cultural, social, and even legal terms
often bears only a superficial
resemblance to what would be
considered proof by those who really
use their minds to think.

For example: in formal mathematics,

proof rules are established - postulates
are set out and a structure is built
based on the postulates and the
theorem. Mathematical proof is pretty
much inarguable: once a proof is
accepted as true it is added to the pool
of known truths.

In legal proof there is a set of rules

and a theory which the prosecution
presents, and attempts to prove by
clever argument. Truth is not the
objective. Getting other people to
believe the theory IS the objective.
However, the prosecution's theory is
whatever the prosecutor believes that
he can get away with based on what is
known about the case, or what he can
PREVENT from being known. What
legal 'proof' does is serve as a
structure for convincing a group of
people of the guilt of a person, about
whom they know nothing. What is
more, there is a another significant
difference: Mathematical proofs are
judged by experts in the particular
case who are free to study any and all
information about the case. Legal
'proof' is judged by people who are
guaranteed to be ignorant of the case,
who are only allowed to study the
information presented during the
formal trial, and who are not even
allowed to consult the texts for what
the rules say. [cf. Canup]

Our culture is so permeated with this

"legal argument" system, that it
extends into our daily experience: the
one who is the slickest at using the
structure for convincing a group of
people of something, is the one who is
believed. Very few people take the
time to obtain hard facts by carefully
studying any and all information about
a situation.

Once again we see something here

that is set up to deceive people by
presenting a familiar structure which,
upon examination, is a sham. And
again, the advantages fall to the hands
of the Matrix Control System.

As Canup points out, in a courtroom,

juries are prohibited by law from
knowing anyone involved in the trial. If
the defendant is a good person who is
being set up and framed, people who
know him well and who have had
much opportunity to interact with him
and observe him, would have much
more trouble accepting lies told about
him. If the jurors knew the prosecutor,
and knew him to be a bullying liar,
they might have trouble believing the
lies he was telling. If the jurors knew
the defendant, and know him to be a
trouble making villain they might be
more likely to convict him.

But, none of those conditions prevail in

a courtroom. And these "rules" have
permeated our society so that it is
confidently proclaimed that we ought
to listen to "both sides of the story,"
even if we know in advance that the
presenter of one of those sides is a
certified liar. Not only a liar, but a
fraud who has repeatedly savaged
other people's lives with his lies and
fraud.

We do have the advantage that people

who have known us for years have
written statements on our behalf. They
are certainly far more likely to know
the "truth" about us than Maynerd
Most who has met us exactly twice.
What is more, there is also the fact
that a journalist spent five years with
us, interviewing our friends, family,
clients, and examining personal
materials, diaries, and so forth.
Maynerd Most tries to tell a "plausible
lie," by implying that, as a result of
information that he, Maynerd Most,
has conveyed to Tom, telling Tom that
we are megalomaniacs trying to run a
cult here, that Tom now has a
"different opinion" of us. But, as it
happens, what Tom really told him
when Most called him to harangue him
with lies and slander, was basically, if
he wants Tom's opinion of us, read the
article. He wrote what he thought
there, and it hasn't changed. Tom
wasn't born yesterday.

The very fact that Maynerd Most would

call Tom and attempt to slander us
says a lot about his agenda, by the
way.

Nevertheless, by assiduously
promoting the idea - common currency
in our society - that his "side of the
story" has merit, in the face of the
testimony of people who have known
us for years, Mr. Most is playing on the
fact that people form opinions based
on who is the slickest liar, and that
people will be inclined to think that the
truth is "somewhere in between."
Those who aren't aware that Maynerd
Most has a long, long history of lying
(to give just one example: he lied to
us that he had a registered publishing
company, and he tried to trick us into
signing a contract with a company that
did not exist as stated in the contract;
for evidence check Alvin Wiley's
account of his interactions with
Maynerd Most), are impressed with his
clever rhetoric and smooth emotion
laden words. He slyly promotes
misunderstanding, and
misunderstanding is almost always a
plus for evil. Having to look the
accused in the eye would make it more
difficult to convict an innocent person,
and easier to convict a guilty one. And
that gives an added advantage to the
Dark Forces on the Internet.

But, as Canups notes, the most

difficult thing about our cultural, social,
and legal system is the most carefully
concealed part of it. Most people know
someone who really needs to be
incarcerated for life. They have caused
so much pain and grief and trouble for
other people that society would be
much better off if they were simply
locked away where they can never
hurt anyone again. Maynerd Most is
such a person, by all accounts. But,
unless they break certain laws, or
unless a person has a lot of money to
pay slick lawyers, it is impossible to
remove such people from destroying
more people and more lives and
causing more pain and more suffering.
Here then we see the worst feature of
the law: it is designed to make the
world safe for evil people. In effect the
law serves to take the horns away
from the bulls, while leaving the lions
their teeth and claws. Massive,
overwhelming, advantage is placed in
the hands of the Dark Forces. Indeed,
without the legal system insuring their
safety, the world would be a much
more difficult place for evil people.

Some readers - such as Maynerd Most

and his cult following will say "So
what? If Most can get away with what
he does, if people are stupid enough to
believe him, they're just getting what
they deserve." If this is your reaction,
you have just identified yourself as
evil. You see, one of the definitions of
an evil person is: A person who is
indifferent to truth and justice.

Maynerd Most and his gang bandy

about that catchall phrase so cherished
in academia: "I disagree, and I am
entitled to disagree." They are, indeed,
entitled to disagree. But generally we
find that when they do so, it is not a
matter of disagreement, it is a
personal attack consisting of lies. Mr.
Most "disagreements" generally
amount to sophistry; argument for
argument's sake, and represents
nothing but a massive waste of time.
In such cases, "I disagree" is a classic
example of a plausible lie. It would
occur to almost no one that a person
using this phrase is attempting to
present the appearance of wisdom
when in fact none exists. It is a way
for people to experience the illusion of
power created by stopping someone
else from doing something good. This
illusion of power is the same one
experienced by vandals who throw
paint on an existing masterpiece: "See
I'm a painter too".

For example: Mr. Most wrote recently

regarding Frank Scott:

I am just glad that I am

 not the one who spent six
years with her on a joint
project only to be
discredited and maligned
after she had finished
using me.

He completely ignores the evidence

that Frank Scott left the group because
he could not turn it into a
moneymaking enterprise with himself
as the beneficiary; because he could
no longer manipulate and control me.
He completely ignores the evidence
that never was a single negative word
written about Frank Scott and all the
hassle that the entire group endured
dealing with him for that same six
years UNTIL he decided to aid and
abet Mr. Michael Most in his blackmail
attempt to force us to remove the
Foundation report. And then, the two
of them conspired to pirate the
transcripts from a stolen CD - which
Maynerd Most obtained from us by
fraud and misrepresentation. Most
ignores the fact - which he well knew -
that we had left the door open for
Frank to get over his attitude and
return to the group right up to his acts
of libel, defamation, and betrayal of
trust. He completely ignores the
testimony of people who have known
us for years, who were present
throughout the whole time, who say
quite clearly that it was Frank Scott
who was using me, it was Frank Scott
who saw my work and effort and
dedication as his ticket to wealth and
glory, the same way he saw his former
employer as someone to be used,
deceived, and embezzled. Maynerd
Most and others, who do not know us,
continue to make these libelous and
defamatory statements and claims
against all the evidence and testimony.
Again we see how they apply the
rules:

* The other team gets to

 make up the rules.
* The referee plays for the
other team.
* One of the rules is that
you are not allowed to
score - the other team is
at no risk - only you can
be scored against. [cf.
Canup]

But what is even more amazing is the

following remark by Maynerd Most:

I will say to you again, the

transcripts would not exist
without the other person
on the planchette. Note
that there are no credible
transcripts since the other
person's departure and
there won't be.......ever.

Especially when you juxtapose it

against his remarks just a week ago:

Keep in mind that 95% of

the raw material in the
transcripts is simply
garbage, newage
maundering and wish-
fulfilment of the worst
kind,

So, which is it? You can't have it both

ways: Is Mr. Scott the great channel?
Or is 95% of the material garbage?
What's all the fuss over if Most and
Frank Scott are convinced that 95% of
the material is garbage? Why do they
want to steal it? Why would Frank
Scott even want to be associated with
it? Where is the "credible material"
produce by Frank Scott solo? Why
aren't they just channeling like crazy
and building a Website with all this
wonderful new material that Frank
Scott is supposedly capable of
producing on his own?
There isn't any and there won't be any.
And they know it.

But Mr. Most was not done when he

wrote that the C's material was 95
percent garbage. He then had to link it
to:

For some time now I have

had reservations about
even defending myself
against the deranged
ranting of someone so
obviously mentally ill.
Laura is simply pathetic,
and deserving of sympathy
and even pity. [...] And
so, as an anniversary
present on the 32nd
anniversary of Laura's
unfortunate incarceration,
I hereby declare the
conflict over.

And we see the real viciousness of the

man. But, that is how a plausible liar
operates. And the fact is, he is a liar.
And he is certainly desperate to
discredit the material that will soon be
published in the narrative of events
being written in the Adventures Series
because that is what so clearly
exposes him for the liar and fraud he
is. And the fact is, the C's were right
again. They provided all the hints that
Frank Scott was not what he claimed,
and that Maynerd Most was not what
he claimed to be. And when all was
said and done, the C's information
proved to be correct yet again. It's all
in black and white. When we checked
out his credentials, his bio, his
educational claims and background, it
was ALL a LIE! When he was tempted
and baited to join in the attack against
us, Frank Scott showed his true colors
as well.

Can a liar stop lying? I don't know. I've

never known it to be so.

Everyone knows, somewhere deep

inside, that there is something not
right about our world. In fact, at the
present moment, it could hardly be
worse. But most people spend their
lives avoiding that fact at all cost. The
brutal truth is that the our social,
cultural, and legal systems are all
about making people helpless then
hammering without mercy - all the
while involving everyone in the illusion
that "right prevails." And the system
programs us to believe that we ought
not to defend ourselves. A plausible
liar might claim that this is evidence
that the one who does fight back is
"good," but it is really to insure that
the innocent person is not able to take
any action. After all - he might object
to what is being done to him and fight
back.

And so it is that I hope that the

readers will spend some considerable
time examining the issues and that
they will realize that all we are doing
here is presenting the results of our
combined life's work. And Maynerd
Most and Frank Scott and others are
clearly and definitely trying to destroy
that, and us along with it. And they are
liars - all of them - from the beginning;
but plausible liars, agents of the
Control System, the massive, global,
multi-millennial deception that has
been set up like a row of dominoes, to
fall into place at the present period of
history: the creation of the Fourth
Reich by George Bush and the
Warmongers aided and abetted by
COINTELPRO both cosmic and third
density as in the activities of most of
the New Age Circus and via such
agents as Maynerd Most et al.
Schwaller de Lubicz and the
Fourth Reich part 3

Laura Knight-Jadczyk

The
Cassiopaeans
have
emphasized
the
importance
of Frequency
Resonance
Vibration.
They have
also
indicated
that the Self
Serving
Negative
Hierarchy
meddles with
it by way of rituals, by way of "beliefs," by
way of tampering with DNA via
"abduction" processes, and so forth. They
have indicated that the Service to Others
alignment acts in accordance with the
natural order of things.

Fulcanelli tells us over and over again that

Plato was an initiate, and he drops clues
everywhere that the "Egyptian" version -
as it is promulgated - is not the true
source of higher positive knowledge. The
clues are given to us in Plato's writings
that the Atlanteans were an "evil empire"
that attempted to conquer the world, and
were defeated by the "Athenians," giving
rise to the archetypal legend of Perseus
and Andromeda.

But, there is certainly a mysterious "gap"

here that begs explanation. Let's have a
look at what the C's have said about it:

08-22-98
Q: (L) In a previous session
you said that the pyramid was
built 10,643 years ago. That
would be 8,649 BC. Is that a
correct figure, or was there
any corruption?
A: Yes. Correct.
Q: Then you talked about the
pyramid as a focuser of
energy to do 'all things' or
many things. Later we asked
about Stonehenge and you
said that Stonehenge was
built 6,000 BC by Druids, an
early Aryan group, as an
energy director to do 'all
things.' This seems to be that
both structures had similar
design functions. Is that
correct?
A: No. Stonehenge is a
vector of energy derived
from Solar and Cosmic
rays. Pyramids focus
electromagnetic energy
from the atmosphere
ambiently. Stonehenge was
built 8,000 BC, by the way.
Q: If it was built in 8,000 BC,
and the Pyramids were built
8,649 BC, which is 10,643
years ago, more or less, that
means that they were built at
almost the same time, or at
least within 600 years of each
other. If they were built at
almost the same time, were
they built by the same, or
similar groups of people?
A: Atlantean descendants.
Q: Obviously the Great
Pyramid is a marvel of
engineering - and Stonehenge
is as well - yet the two
structures are so dissimilar.
The Pyramid presents such a
 finished and sharp and
elegant appearance, and
Stonehenge might give a
person - of course that is
based on how it appears
today - a more primitive
presentation.
A: Was not originally.
Q: Did they work in
conjunction with one another
and were the two groups that
built them in communication
with one another?
A: No and yes.
Q: Was it two different
groups? One with the
Stonehenge business and one
with the Pyramid business?
A: Offshoots of same
group.
A: Were they antagonistic
toward one another or were
they friendly toward one
another?
A: No, yes.
Q: If the flood of Noah, as you
have said before, occurred
10,662 BC, that means that
the Pyramid and Stonehenge
were built more than 2,000
years after this event.
A: Yes.
Q: Did it take 2,000 years for
them to develop or create the
technology?
A: No.
Q: What were they doing in
those 2,000 years?
A: Reassembling.
Q: In that 2,000 years of
reassembling, do you mean
reassembling as a group
through reincarnative
processes...
A: All.

Now, we face a dilemma here. There were

obviously two approaches to reality being
taken by these two groups. It is stated
that they did not work in conjunction with
one another, yet, we also see that they
were not antagonistic toward one another,
and they were in communication with one
another. Further, the remark is made that
they were "offshoots" of the same group: i.
e. "Atlantean Descendants."

Regarding the idea of Atlantis, the C's

have made a few most interesting
remarks that can be clearly understood by
observing our own civilization today:

09-30-94
Q: (L) Was the story of Noah's
flood the story of the breaking
up of Atlantis?
A: Yes. But symbolic.
Q: (L) How many people were
on the planet at that time?
A: 6 billion.
Q: (L) Out of this six billion
people, how many survived?
A: 119 million. (or 19 million)
[I am not sure of this figure.
The early tapes were
destroyed, and the notes have
the number both ways with a
couple of cross-outs.]

10-09-94
Q: (L) Can you tell us more
about the six billion people on
the planet at the time of
Noah's flood. Where were
most of these beings living?
A: Atlantis.

05-09-98
Q: Okay. I would like to know
what the geographic
coordinates, according to our
current grid system, that
would frame Atlantis. I don't
need the exact shape, just a
general box shape... the
perimeter...
A: Like asking: "What are the
geographic coordinates of the
North Atlantic Treaty
Organization?"
Q: Okay, let me get more
specific: the Atlantean land
that was supposed to have
existed in the Atlantic
Ocean... what was the
farthest north of any any part
of Atlantis that was in the
ocean, that no longer exists?
A: It is "time for you" to know
that Atlantis was not a nation,
land, Island, or continent, but
rather, a civilization!
Q: All I wanted was to have
an idea of a land mass in the
Atlantic ocean that people talk
about - where did it sit?
A: Where do you think?
Q: Well, I sort of think that
the Azores and the Canary
Islands are sort of...
A: Yes, but many other places
too. Remember, the sea level
was several hundred feet
lower then...
Q: Why was the sea level
several hundred feet lower?
Because there was ice
somewhere or because there
was not as much water on the
earth at that time?
A: Ice.
Q: Was the ice piled up at the
poles? The ice sheet of the ice
age?
A: Yes.
Q: So, Atlantis existed during
the ice age?
A: Largely, yes. And the
world's climate was scarcely
any colder away from the ice
sheets than it is today.
Q: Well, how could that be?
What caused these glaciers?
A: Global warming.
Q: How does global warming
cause glaciers?
A: Increases precipitation
dramatically. Then moves the
belt of great precipitation
 much farther north. This
causes rapid buildup of ice
sheets, followed by
increasingly rapid and intense
glacial rebound.

As an aside, regarding "glacial rebound,"

the C's have also commented:

02-22-97
A: [...] One change to occur
in 21st Century is sudden
glacial rebound, over Eurasia
first, then North America. Ice
ages develop much, much,
much faster than thought.

But, getting back to Atlantis, the global

civilization that must have been similar in
many ways to our own. Notice that the C's
made a specific comparison to NATO, or a
"World Government" sort of thing. The
deeper implications of this remark suggest
that a certain "group" conceives of such
an organization, and "sells" it to other
countries, and then it is used as a
platform to institute global economic
control. And that is exactly what is
happening today, and it began with NATO
and, as we showed in our analysis of
Game Theory, it is the platform upon
which the New World Order, based on
Egyptian Synarchy and the work of
Schwaller de Lubicz is intended to be
based.

In other words, the North and South

American continents could very well be
the "island of Atlantis." And all of the
evidence we have collected about the prior
destruction of North America, including
the evidence of nuclear fission in the
Great Lakes region, the vast copper mines
of Isle Royale, evidence that Tiahuanaco
used to be a seaport and the astronomical
evidence that the ancient cities of South
Americs were built at least 15,000 years
ago, point to the America's being Atlantis
itself.
 08-20-01
Q: What group mined the
copper in northern Wisconsin,
Minnesota, and Michigan, like
in Isle Royale?
A: Aryans.
Q: What did they want the
copper for?
A: Weapons.
Q: Wouldn't iron make better
weapons?
A: Not in 4th density.
Q: I'm getting the feeling that
there have been bleed-in,
bleed-out situations with 4th
density on this planet a lot
more often than we suspect.
A: Yes.
Q: Are these situations
sometimes manufactured by
those who know how?
A: Close.
Q: Do they just happen to
know where those window
points are?
A: Yes.
Q: Is it significant that Rock
Lake is on the same longitude
line as Tikal?
A: Yes.

In all the Celtic folklore when they talk

about 'fairies,' which are obviously other
density beings very similar to our modern
'Gray alien,' these fairy/aliens insist that
no iron come near them in any way. It
was also said that bringing iron into
contact with someone thought to be a
'changeling' would prove whether or not
they were because if they were, they
would disappear instantly. Also, the
instructions for the building of the Temple
of Solomon included restrictions on the
use of iron in either the preparation of the
materials or the putting together of the
building itself, even down to the rejection
of the use of iron nails in any part.

J.M. Allen in his new book "Atlantis: The

Andes solution" attempts to show that
the Altiplano area in Bolivia is really part
of the continent that held the city of
Atlantis. He makes another connection by
pointing out that ATL is the Nahuatl word
for water and ANTIS is the Quechua is
word for copper. And so, by his reasoning,
ATL-ANTIS must be a word from South
America meaning Copper-Water.

This issue of needing "4th density

weapons" made of copper, combined with
Allen's idea above leads to another
interesting comment made by the C's:

10-20-94
Q: Who built the city of
Mohenjo-Daro?
A: Lizards directly.
Coatzlmundi legend ties in to
this directly. Look at
illustrations on stones now.
Q: Who is Coatzlmundi?
A: Other deity of the Lizards
worshipped by the Atlanteans
and their descendants
because of the direct contact
with humans for 1000 years.

10-22-94
Q: (L) Did any aliens at all,
and specifically the Lizzies,
ever live among mankind and
receive worship?
A: They did not live among
mankind, but they did interact
directly with human beings, at
various points in the past. It
was at those points when
human beings were ready,
willing and able to accept
deities appearing directly from
outside sources and then
worship them. Such things
would not have occurred in
the recent past. But, beware,
it may very well occur very
soon. [...]
Q: (L) Who built the city of
Angkor Wat?
A: That was built by the
Lizard Beings themselves.
Built approximately 3108
years ago.
Q: (L) Who built the city of
Mohenjo Daro?
A: That also was built by the
Lizard Beings directly.
Q: (L) Did they live in these
cities?
A: No, as stated before, they
did not live there, they visited
or occupied on a temporary
basis, but did not live there.
Q: (L) Who did they build the
cities for?
A: They built the cities for
themselves and their
worshippers amongst
humans.

08-22-98
Q: We watched this television
show the other night which
talked about the city of
Angkor Wat and its orientation
to Draco 10,500 BC. You said
that Angkor Wat was built
3108 years ago by the Lizzies
themselves, and that the city
of Mohenjo Daro was also
built by the Lizzies 3065 years
ago, which is within 30 or 40
years of the same time
period. Do you still confirm
that the Lizzies themselves
built these cities?
A: Reptilian Beings.
Q: And they did this
themselves?
A: Yes.
Q: What happened to the
inhabitants of these cities?
A: Taken to another planet.
Q: Why was this city built in
orientation to the constellation
Draco?
A: Was not, was a record: see
the texts of Kaballah for
details after linkage is
established.
Q: After what linkage is
established?
A: Between the astronomical
data and the sites.

11-16-94
Q: (L) You said that the
Lizzies lived among humans
for a thousand years. When,
in our illusion of time, did this
occur?
A: During peak of Atlantis.
Q: (L) And how long was the
Atlantean civilization in
existence?
A: 70,000 years

08-29-98
Q: It also says here that on
this pyramid, at the time of
the Spring and Autumn
equinoxes, combined patterns
of light and dark combine to
create the illusion of a giant
serpent undulating on the
northern staircase. On each
occassion the illusion lasts for
3 hours and 22 minutes
exactly. What was this optical
illusion created to convey?
A: Worship of serpentine
deity.
Q: Was it created to convey
or produce any other effect
other than worship?
A: The key is in the reading of
the geometric cycle.
Q: On page 80, the book talks
about these statues at
Tiahuanaco on Lake Titicaca.
It says:

'Carved in red
sandstone, worn
and ancient
beyond
reckoning, the
statue stands
about 6 feet high
 and portrays a
humanoid,
androgynous
being with
massive eyes and
lips. In it's right
hand it clutches
something
resembling a
knife with a wavy
blade like an
Indonesian kris.
In it's left hand is
an object like a
hinged and case-
bound book. From
the top of this
book, however,
protruded a
device which had
been inserted into
it as though into a
sheath. From the
waist down, the
figure seemed to
be clad in a
garment of fish
scales.'

Okay, there is another statue

with an object in it's left hand
that is like a case bound book,
but from it protruded a forked
handle. The right hand object
was roughly cylindrical,
narrow in the center and
bigger at each end. It
appeared to have several
different parts. I would like to
know what these objects, or
devices, carved into these
ancient statues represented?
A: Conductor.
Q: What did these conductors
conduct? Were these the
sound machines that you have
described previously?
A: No.
Q: What did they conduct?
A: Quartzine energy from
atmospheric source.
Q: What was this energy used
for?
A: All.
Q: Well you have described a
lot of things that did all kinds
of things... the pyramid,
Stonehenge...
A: When one harnesses free
energy, no limitations need
apply.
Q: Why were these beings
depicted with these fish-like
garments?
A: Reptoids have that genetic
profile to varying degrees.
Q: According to the Sumerian
traditions, this was like the
god Oannes. In the night
time, he would plunge back
into the sea, but in the
daytime he would converse
with men, giving them insight
into letters and sciences and
every kind of art. But, it was
noted that he was never
observed to eat. It says that
he taught men how to
construct houses, temples, to
compile laws, and explained
to them the principles of
geometric knowledge. He
made them distinguish the
seeds of the earth and made
them gather fruits. In short,
he instructed them in
everything that would tend to
soften manners and humanize
mankind. From that time, so
universal were his
instructions, that nothing has
been added materially in the
way of improvement. The
surviving images of Oannes
on Babylonian and Assyrian
reliefs clearly portray him as a
fish man. Is this another
similar profile?
A: "El legato."
Q: Was this Oannes fish man
similar to the Quinotaur that
was supposedly the half-
father of the Merovingian
royal line?
A: Only if one considers losses
in the translative quarry.

08-28-99
Q: I have this book, this
Marcia Schafer thing:
"Confessions of an
Intergalactic Anthropologist,"
and its a bunch of channelled
stuff; one thing she says: "the
snake is associated with the
sign of wisdom and higher
learning, and is often
regarded quite highly in
mystical circles." She had an
interaction with a rattlesnake,
for which she felt sympathy,
and she also has sympathetic
interactions with Lizzies. I
would like to have a comment
on the idea of the snake as a
"sign of wisdom and higher
learning." Does this, in fact,
represent what the snake
symbolizes?
A: Snake is/was reported in
context of the viewpoint of
the observer.
Q: Are you saying that when
the observer's viewpoint is
that the snake is a symbol of
higher learning, maybe...
A: Maybe the observer was
just "blown away" by the
experience.
Q: Clarify, please.
A: If you were living in the
desert, or jungle, about 7,000
years ago, as you measure
time, would you not be
impressed if these Reptoid
"dudes" came down from the
heavens in silvery objects and
demonstrated techno-wonders
from thousands of years in
the future, and taught you
calculus, geometry and
astrophysics to boot?!?
Q: Is that, in fact, what
happened?
A: Yup.

10-18-94
Q: (L) Who created the
Lizzies?
A: Ormethion.
Q: (L) And who is this
individual?
A: Thought center.
Q: (L) Located where?
A: Everywhere.
Q: (L) Can you give us a little
more of a clue?
A: Another sector of reality.
Q: (L) Is this a sentient, self-
aware being that created the
Lizzies?
A: Yes and no.[...]
Q: (L) And who created this
Ormethion?
A: Not being; thought center.

10-20-94
Q: Is Ormethion who the
Lizzies worship?
A: Close.
Q: Who do they worship?
What do they call their god?
A: Physical universe.
Q: The physical universe is
their god?
A: Yes.

11-07-94
Q: (L) What are the
implications of the fact that
the Lizzies worship the
physical universe?
A: Self service.
Q: (L) What do they see in
the physical universe that
they feel is superior to the
spiritual universe?
A: All who serve self yearn for
physicality.
Q: (L) These bodies they are
 creating for themselves, are
they creating some kind of
super physical beings they
can then move into and
occupy which will have very
advanced abilities that would
enable them to serve self
better, longer or more
completely?
A: Yes.

The link between South America, Mohenjo

Daro in the Indus Valley, and Egypt and
Judaism/Kaballah will be more important
further along, so keep it in mind.

Plato makes a somewhat confusing

remark about Atlantis:

"At the centre of the island,

near the sea, was a plain, said
to be the most beautiful and
fertile of all plains, and near
the middle of this plain about
fifty stades inland a hill of no
great size," (Critias. 113b)

This description basically says that the city

of Atlantis was both in the middle of the
island, as well as being near the sea. But,
this problem disappears when we think
that Plato was an initiate and was
speaking in code about a literal, global
civilization. The ancients often referred to
a nation by its "chief city." In the
upcoming excerpt, the C's make the
comment that "Atlantis was merely a
home base of an advanced civilisation of 3
races of humans occupying different
sections of a huge Island empire, which, in
itself, underwent 3 incarnations over a
100,000 year period as you would
measure it. [...] [The Celts] took over the
Northern section. "

Now, "different sections" of a "huge island

empire," put together with the idea that
this "empire" was global, leaves the
possibility open for all of the America's to
be part of this empire, and for North
America to be the "northern section" that
was almost utterly destroyed in a
cataclysm. When we consider such things
as the badlands, the grand canyon, the
Carolina bays, the nuclear evidence of the
Great Lakes region, we come to the idea
that something truly dreadful happened to
North America and that it may have been
a combination of war and cometary
bombardment. There is also evidence that
there was a massive shift of the earth
crust raising the western coast of South
America, and a similar raising of the
Western part of North America could have
been involved in that scenario. In short,
much of what is Western America could
have formerly been under the Pacific. And
the raising of this Western portion most
definitely could have sunk the Eastern
seaboard of North America as the
evidence of the Bimini wall, and other
remains suggest.

In short, such a scenario would fit Plato's

description of the destruction of Atlantis in
a "single day and night."

What is more interesting, however, is the

hyperdimensional manipulations that
occur during such cataclysmic upheavals.
We can even think of this as the moving of
the "playing pieces" in the Secret Games
of the Gods.

11-02-94
Q: (L) When the Aryans were
brought here, were they
brought to Atlantis?
A: No. The Aryans were
different from the Atlanteans.

05-07-95
Q: (L) Who constructed the
great serpent mound in
Adams County, Ohio?
A: Armonan sect.
Q: (T) Who are the
Armonans?
A: Atlantean descendants.
Q: (T) So, this was a long
time ago? (L) Is there
anything about them we
would be advised to know or
learn?
A: "Puzzle pieces."
Q: (L) What period of time did
they live in this area, from
when to when?
A: See answers to Sumerian
question.
Q: (L) Well, my opinion to this
whole thing is that the
Sumerians and the Armonans
were Atlanteans who set up
shop in their respective places
when Atlantis went under.
A: Good, now go with that.
Q: (L) I would say that the
same answer holds for the
White Horse at Uffington, in
England?
A: Yup.

05-31-97
Q: In the information I now
have on the Canaries, I found
that a strange icon appeared
on the island long before the
conquest, long before any
missionaries or Europeans
arrived. The natives were the
big, blond types. They said
that they knew this icon was
divine because following its
appearance, there were
processions of angels, or
divine beings, up and down
the beach where it appeared,
lights, smells, chanting and
singing and so forth. How did
the statue of the Virgin of
Candelaria arrive on the
beach at Tenerife?
A: Teleportation.
Q: Who teleported it there?
A: The "Celts."
Q: Celts in the sense of the
Druids?
A: Or in the sense of
Atlanteans.
Q: Now, you said before that
Atlanteans were not Celts, is
that correct?
A: No.
Q: The Atlanteans were Celts?
A: "Celts, Druids," etc... are
merely latter day
designations.
Q: Let's back up here. You
said that the Celts came from
Kantek. They were
transported by the Lizzies...
brought here, correct?
[Kantek: the fifth planet of
the solar system that was
destroyed and is now the
asteroid belt.]
A: Yes.
Q: When the Lizzies did this,
how many Celts were
physically brought here?
A: Hundreds of millions.
Q: How long, in our terms, did
it take to bring these Celts to
this planet? Or, is this
ongoing?
A: Well, in the sense that you
measure it, let us say about a
week.
Q: Did they transport them in
ships, that is some sort of
structure. That is, did they
load them up, move them into
4th density, reemerge here in
3rd density, or something like
that?
A: Close.
Q: And they unloaded them in
the area of the Caucasus, is
that correct?
A: And regions surrounding.
Q: And, that was what, 79 to
80 thousand years ago?
A: Over 80,000.
Q: As I understand it, Atlantis
was already quite a developed
civilization at that time, is that
correct?
A: Yes, but regions change
with waves of immigration, or
conquest... witness your own
lands.
Q: You also said once that
there was a nuclear war in
India and that this was what
was being discussed in the
Vedas when it talks about the
'blue-skinned' people who
weren't really blue because
they were Celts, and they
were flying in aircraft, and
they were engaged in this
war, etc. Who were the Celts
at war with?
A: The Paranthas.
Q: Now, wait a minute! Who
are the Paranthas?! Do we
have a new player here?
A: Not new.
Q: Do we know them by
another name?
A: Choose.
Q: The Atlanteans? Were the
Celts of India at war with the
Atlanteans in the Atlantic?
A: Atlantis was merely a
home base of an advanced
civilisation of 3 races of
humans occupying different
sections of a huge Island
empire, which, in itself,
underwent 3 incarnations over
a 100,000 year period as you
would measure it.
Q: The 3 races were the
Celts... and who were the
second and third?
A: Or Kantekkians.
Q: Are the Kantekkians
different from the Celts?
A: Only in the sense of long
term racial and genetic
blending.
Q: So, Atlantis had the
Kantekkians and who else?
A: Race you would call "Native
Americans," and a third, no
longer existing race,
 somewhat resembling
Australian or Guinean
aborigines, only lighter in
complexion.
Q: Was this third group
destroyed by the other two?
A: One of the 3 cataclysms.
[...]
Q: So, the Paranthas were the
antecedents of the Abos of
Australia?
A: Yes, and compare to now
existing peoples of India,
Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Australia,
and New Guinea for
similarities, bearing in mind
genetic mixing and dilution.
Q: Were the Vedas written by
the Paranthas or written by
the Celts?
A: Descendants of Parantha,
as per "Divine guidance."
[...]
Q: [...] We have taken care of
a couple of points; we have 3
races on Atlantis, Celts all
over the place... did the Celts
conquer the Atlanteans?
A: No.
Q: Did they just move in and
hang out?
A: They took over the
Northern section.
Q: At the same time, there
were Celts in the Caucasus,
along the Baltic, in Ireland,
England and Europe...
A: Ireland, England, etc. was
later.
Q: But there were in the
Norse lands, as Sweden,
Norway and Denmark, they
were along the Baltic, and
they were in the Caucasus?
A: Some above mentioned
areas were ice covered.

Tracing human beings, their cultures and

trying to figure out who is really on first, is
difficult at best. This is especially true
when trying to correlate the legends and
myths to the archeological facts. When
different cultures mix so do their genes.
Mitochondrial DNA is inherited only from
your mother. The "Eve Hypothesis" that
has been widely promulgated is somewhat
misleading because very few popular
discussions of this idea reveal that the
results of the DNA investigations showed
two "origins" for humanity, Asia and
Africa. In other words, a more or less
North/South division. One method of
assessing relationships between cultures is
their blood group, but it may not be very
accurate because blood type is not
determined by Mitochondrial DNA, but by
nuclear DNA. The conquering of a tribe by
another, the killing of all the males and
the subsequent mating with all the
females, can very quickly produce a
dominant "type" that may not accurately
reflect the actual cultural tracks.

The AB group is almost non-existent in

apes, and O is minimal! Chimpanzees are
mainly group A (never B), and Gorillas are
mainly group B (never A). Similarly, the
early Europeans had a high % of group A,
whilst the Asiatic races had a high % of B.
So the idea has been proposed that
chimpanzees developed into Cro-Magnon
man then Europeans, whilst Gorillas
developed into the larger brained
Neaderthals then into the Asians. To
account for group O there must have been
a third group of proto-humans who were
O. Type O occurs only as a recessive
gene. Both parents must have at least one
copy of the gene to produce a child who is
type O.

Most blood groupings are generally split

evenly. However, there are some pure
groupings. For group O the Bororo,
Mayans and Incas are all virtually 100%
group O. Further north, the Navajos are
73% group O. Still further north, the
Blackfoot indians are 82% group A. Group
AB, which is rare, includes the Peking
Chinese, Korean, Japanese at about 10-
18%. Poles, Czechs and Hungarian
Gypsies are run at about 9-10% of the AB
group. Interestingly, Tartars and Hindus
show also strong AB.

It has been noted that some disease

causing organisms have the same proteins
on their surface as some of the blood
types leading to the idea that some blood
groups are more susceptible than others
to certain diseases. This leads to the idea
that populations can be deliberatly
manipulated by introducing epidemics that
"favor" certain blood groups. This may be
the reason for the unusual "purity" of
blood groups in certain populations. Those
who carried the "wrong" type were
eliminated by viral or bacterial population
control methods. The C's have, in fact,
mentioned just such a possibility:

08-09-97
A: You should know that these
bloodlines become
parasitically infected,
harrassed and tinkered with
whenever a quantum leap of
awareness is imminent. Such
as "now."

Claims have been made that the O blood

group is the blood of royalty (blue blood),
that stems from an Atlantean heritage.
The races that possess this blood races
(called the Red races) are races of the
Americas; of the Canary Islands; Basques,
Scandinavians, Celts, as well as certain
Polynesian and Indonesian peoples.
However, this could be altogether
misleading due to the "conquering" factor,
as well as the "parasitic" factor of
population manipulation. One thing that
seems clear is that there is serious
"manipulation" of populations going on,
and it is quite easy to imagine that the
type O prevalence is a result of the
introduction of the Kantekkians, a group
described as being closer to the Orion
genetic heritage, the tall, blond, nordic
types, which can be either strongly
polarized positively or negatively. In other
words, the type O blood group may not be
the "Lizard genetics" that has been
proposed by some of the wilder theories
making the rounds, though it may indeed
be the blood group of individuals
possessing very strong genetic potential
for good OR evil as the following excerpts
indicate:

11-04-94
Q: (L) Who are the Nordic
type aliens?
A: Your ancestors.
Q: (L) What planet did they
come from?
A: Several and transitory.

03-04-95
A: We are providing
invaluable information which
becomes knowledge, but you
are under attack, therefore,
you could maybe use some
direct power from the same
density as the attack is
coming from.
Q: (F) But, until you have
total knowledge... (L) You
don't have the kind of power
we are talking about needing.
(F) Right. We would would
need 500,000 pages of
transcript to have that kind of
knowledge, to get to that
point. (L) Okay, what is the
phone number of the Orion
Federation? (S) Laura! (T)
That's what I was going to
ask. [Laughter.] (L) How do
we get ahold of them?
A: Off the hook!
Q: (T) Uh oh! (L) They're
busy? (T) Getting a lot of
calls. (L) Okay, guys, what do
we need to do here?
A: Find a "Nordic." They are
on Earth posing as humans.
Q: (T) They are 4th density. I
thought they...
A: Yes.
Q: (T) I thought that 4th
density couldn't hold the
frequency that long and that
is why the Lizards have so
much trouble. (J) They're
STS.
A: Not STO!

09-24-95
Q: (L) Are the Orion STS the
infamous red-headed Nordic
aliens?
A: Yes, and all other
humanoid combinations.
Q: (L) Okay, if it started with
the Nordic types, and that is
where the other humanoid
combinations came from,
what genetic combinations
were used for human beings?
Black people, for instance,
since they are so unlike
"Nordics?"
A: The Nordic genes were
mixed with the gene pool
already available on Earth,
known as Neanderthal.
Q: (L) What was the genetic
combination used to obtain
the Oriental races?
A: Orientals come from a
region known in your legends
as "Lemuria," and are a
previous hybridization from 7
genetic code structures from
within Orion Union, designed
to best fit the earth climate
and cosmic ray environment
then existent on earth.
Q: (L) Okay, what about the
Semitic and Mediterranean
peoples?
A: Each time a new flock was
"planted," it was engineered
to be best suited to the
environment where it was
planted. Aryans are the only
exception, as they had to be
moved to earth in an
emergency.
Q: (L) If races are engineered
on earth to be "best suited,"
what factors are being drawn
from or considered regarding
the Semitic race?
A: They are not engineered on
earth, but in Orion lab as all
others. They were "Planted" in
the Middle East.
Q: (L) What genetic type were
the Atlanteans?
A: They were the same as the
"Native Americans."

11-11-95
Q: (L) This book describes the
Nordic aliens as having blood
with a different chemical base
than ours...
A: This is trivial
disinformation, "Nordic"
Physiology is identical to
yours, with the exception
being their cranium, which
averages 3 per cent larger.

03-23-96
A: The Nordic Covenant was a
duality. [...] All persons of
Nordic heritage hold secret
power centers, can be of
darkness, or of light...

08-15-98
Q: (L) Okay, now: I would like
to know if there was a real
historic person behind the
legend of King Arthur?
A: Close. Sorcerer's Coven.
Secret pact of coven is
covenant.
Q: (L) Was this the Nordic
Covenant behind the legend
of King Arthur?
A: Not really.
Q: (L) I think that implies that
there might be a connection?
A: Maybe there is something
more like an offshoot.
 Q: (L) The Nordic Covenant is
an offshoot of the Arthurian
Covenant or vice versa?
A: King Arthur story based on
an offshoot of Nordic
Covenant Root.
Q: (L) Okay, now you say that
the Nordic Covenant can be
positive or negative. Would
the Arthurian Cycle be of the
Positive Offshoot?
A: Both.

12-26-98
Q: Is the Nordic Covenant in
any sense similar to any of
the things I have read here?
A: It is a mystical thing, not
related to theology in a direct
sense.
Q: How long has the Nordic
Covenant been in existence?
A: 5129 years.

Diverting from this session momentarily,

we note that 3131 BC is very close to
3100 B.C, a time of some sort of global
disruption recorded in ice cores and tree
rings. The fact is, there was some sort of
discontinuity of many ancient cultures
which occurred at this period: 3100 B.C. It
is also the time estimated for the
unification of Egypt and the beginning of
the reign of Narmer/Menes. This leads us
to another interesting series of questions:

03-07-95
Q: (L) Who were the Elohim of
the Bible?
A: Transdefinitive. And
variable entities. [...] First
manifestation was human,
then non-human. [...]
Q: (L) Well, what brought
about their transformation
from huma to non-human?
A: Pact or covenant.
Q: (L) They made a pact or
covenant with each other?
A: No, with 4th density STS.
Q: (L) Well, that is not good!
Are you saying that the
Elohim are STS? Who were
these STS beings they made a
pact with?
A: Rosteem, now manifests as
Rosicrucians.
Q: (L) What is their purpose?
A: As yet unrevealable to you.

Was Narmer part of this

"Nordic Covenant?" How does
the name "Rostau," the
ancient designation for Giza,
relate to the Rose-Cross, or
the Rosicrucians?

10-04-97
Q: In reading the transcripts,
I came across a reference to a
'pact' made by a group of STS
individuals, and it was called
'Rosteem,' and that this was
the origin of the Rosicrucians.
In the book 'The Orion
Mystery,' it talks about the
fact that Giza was formerlay
known as RosTau, which is
'Rose Cross.' Essentially, I
would like to understand the
symbology of the Rose affixed
to the Cross. It seems to me
that the imagery of Jesus
nailed to the Cross is actually
the Rose affixed to the Cross.
How does Jesus relate to the
Rose?
A: No, it is from the Rose
arose the Cross. [...]
Q: What does the cross
symbolize?
A: The symbology is not the
issue. It is the effect.
Q: What is the effect of the
cross?
A: All that has followed it.

And this leads us to that most

interesting character,
promoted assiduously since
the end of the dark ages, as
the "father of alchemy,"
Hermes the Thrice Great:

10-16-94
Q: (L) Who was Hermes
Trismegistus?
A: Traitor to court of Pharoah
Rana.
Q: (L) Who is Pharoah Rana?
A: Egyptian leader of spiritual
covenant.
Q: (L) In what way was
Hermes a traitor?
A: Broke covenant of spiritual
unity of all peoples in area
now known as Middle East.
Q: (L) Who did Hermes
betray?
A: Himself; was power
hungry.
Q: (L) What acts did he do?
A: Broke covenant; he
inspired divisions within ranks
of Egyptians, Essenes,
Aryans, and Persians et cetera.
Q: (L) What was his purpose
in doing this?
A: Divide and conquer as
inspired by those referred to
as Brotherhood in Bramley
book you have read.
Q: (L) Is this the Brotherhood
of the snake Hermes formed
in rejection of unity?
A: Hermes did not form it; it
was long since in existence.
Q: (L) Who was the originator
of the Brotherhood of the
Serpent as described in the
Bramley book?
A: Lizard Beings.

10-25-94
Q: (L) I would like to know
the approximate year of the
life of Hermes Trismegistus.
A: 5211 [years ago] approx.
And that brings us right back into the
ballpark with the time of Narmer's
"Unification" of Egypt and the formation of
the "Elohim Covenant." The question is,
how does this relate to the Nordic
Covenant? Back to the 12-26-98 session
we interrupted:

Q: Is the Nordic Covenant

made between humans and
other humans, or between
humans and higher density
beings?
A: Mostly between humans
and humans, but some of the
other.
Q: Does this Nordic Covenant
exist on the earth today in
similar format as it did at its
inception?
A: Yes.
Q: Is this Nordic Covenant the
same as you have referred to
as the Quorum?
A: No.
Q: Would you say that the
Nordic Covenant and the
Quorum are in opposition, or
just different?
A: Segmented relationship.
Q: Is there any particular
thing about this that I ought
to ask at the moment that I
am not going to discover in
the course of my research?
The mail group asked a few
questions about this, so I
thought I ought to approach
the subject. Is the Nordic
Covenant made between
people who are blond and
blue-eyed?
A: Not the central issue.
Q: What is the central issue of
the Nordic Covenant?
A: Bloodline extends off the
planet.
Q: Is this Nordic Covenant a
group that is in place on the
planet for the purpose of
guarding or propagating a
particular bloodline?
A: To guard secrets.
Q: What does this secret have
to do with a bloodline?
A: You should be able to
figure this one out!
Q: Are these people with this
bloodline and with these
secrets the same ones
involved with the genetic
engineering of new bodies for
the Lizzies to occupy at the
point of transition to 4th
density?
A: No.
Q: Are these secrets negative
to our civilization or race?
A: From your perspective,
maybe.
Q: Do these bloodlines have
to do with Nephilim?
A: A little.
Q: What secrets are they
guarding?
A: Your origins; the nature of
your being.
Q: So, this Nordic Covenant is
that which wishes to maintain
the darkness of our realm, the
time loops, the replays, and
all that sort of thing?
A: One of the players, yes.
Q: You also said that the
Nordic Covenant was a
duality, that it could be
positive or negative.

01-02-99
Q: Well, let me get to some of
these other questions.
Previously you said that the
central thing about the Nordic
Covenant was that there were
bloodlines that extend off the
planet. From what I
understand, all humans on the
planet have bloodlines that
extend off the planet. In what
sense did you mean this about
the Nordic Covenant; that the
bloodlines extend off the
planet?
A: Not all so recent, not all so
"pure."
Q: In the sense of recent, how
recent do you mean?
A: Speculate, using your
transcripts.

02-19-00
Q: What was the connection
between the Hyperboreans,
including the Celts of Britain, I
believe, and the people of
Delos?
A: Northern peoples were
responsible for civilising the
Meditteranean/Adriatic
peoples with the encoded
secrets contained within their
superior extra-terrestrially
based genetic arrangement.
Practice of which you speak
was multi-trans-generational
habit.
Q: Is it the case that some of
them communicated with
higher density beings via
Stonehenge, and that these
communications they
received...
A: Stonehenge used to
resonate with tonal rill,
teaching the other wise
unteachable with wisdoms
entered psychically through
crown chakra transceiving
system.

04-08-00
Q: Now, I have this book
entitled "Arktos." He says
something here that echoes a
remark you once made. He
says:

"It is a very
remarkable thing
that
 enlightenment
seems to have
come from the
North against the
common
prejudice that the
Earth was
enlightened as it
was populated
from South to
North. The
Scythians are one
of the most
ancient nations;
the Chinese
descend from
them. The
Atlanteans
themselves, more
ancient than the
Egyptians,
descend from
them."

You said that the civilizing

influence came from the North
to the South. Of course, all
the standard texts claim that
civilization came from South
to North, starting in
Mesopotamia. Now, getting...
A: Okay, just a minute here.
Thinking Mesopotamia is the
beginning is like thinking that
the beginning starts at the
12th chapter.
Q: I know that! The problem
is: finding artifacts. I've been
searching and digging, and I
find a little bit here and there,
but my God! Either nothing
survived...
A: Artifacts have a limited
shelf life!
Q: Exactly! The problem is
that they've got specimens of
humanoid types from 100 to
200 thousand years ago, and
even further, but no
specimens of modern man
that are that old. Why is this
so? Are they just looking in
the wrong places?
A: Specimens survive by
sheer luck.
Q: So, they are lucky that
they have any specimens at
all. Who knows, when they
find a very ancient specimen
of a modern type human, they
won't believe it - it will be
called an "anomaly!" There
ARE artifacts that are
EXTREMELY ancient, which
give evidence of the presence
of modern type man, and they
just simply argue themselves
to death over them.
A: Yes.
Q: They ignore them. But,
during the time Neanderthal
man was on the Earth, did he
live alongside Modern man?
A: Yes. Except modern type
man was different then.
Q: In what ways?
A: DNA and psycho/electrical
frequencies.
Q: Does this mean that their
physical appearance was
different from what we
consider to be modern man?
A: Radiance.
Q: What do you mean
"radiance?"
A: You find out!
Q: Oh, that's interesting.
Well, there are legends that
the Northern people had
"light" in their veins. Very
ancient belief. Is this what
you are referring to?
A: Maybe.
Q: Was this light related to
the hemoglobin level, the iron
level in the blood?
A: Maybe.
Q: Did they have a much
higher iron level in their
blood?
A: Possibly....
Q: Okay, part of the ancient
legend of Arktos was that, in
very ancient times the Earth
was different because it had a
vertical axial orientation. This
contributed to the golden age
or the Edenic condition. Is
this, in fact, one of the
conditions that existed in the
Golden Age?
A; Well, yes, but still some
puzzle pieces needed.
Q: I noticed also that there
are several ball-park type
figures given for the
precessional cycles.
Apparently there is not a
whole lot of agreement as to
how long this cycle is, exactly.
I notice that, if you divide
309,882 years by 12, you
come out right in the ball park
of 12 precessional cycles. Is
this the reason that the zodiac
was set up with twelve signs
or houses?
A: Related, yes.
Q: Now, since all the recent
conjecture about the
precessional cycle has really
gone all over the place, it is
my thought that the real
reason for the ancient clues
about this cycle are to inform
us that the length of 12 of
these cycles is a GRAND
Cycle, and that THIS is the big
clue.
A: Needs some study by you.
Q: One of the interesting
things about this Northern
civilizational factor is that one
of the hallmarks of the Aryan
attitude is the Male dominated
religion. When did the
masculine religion "take
over?" Was this always the
tendency or leaning of the
Aryan group?
A: Involves more than
religion. Religion is the
facilitator.
Q: Facilitator of what?
A: Customary psycho/social
habitue.
Q: Customary to whom?
A: Those whom you refer to
as Aryans.
Q: Where did they acquire the
"habit" of a masculine
oriented religion? Everybody
else was worshipping the
goddess in one form or
another. But this male
dominated theology was the
distinguishing characteristic of
the Northern peoples. Where
did they come up with this.
A: Originated on home planet.
Q: Kantek?
A: For all intents and
purposes.
Q: Was it this male dominated
religion that contributed to
the destruction of Kantek?
A: No.
Q: Okay, when they were on
their home planet, why did
they develop a masculine
religion as opposed to a
feminine one, considering the
fact that women are the
source of life, in certain
terms?
A: In your density,
masculinism/feminish is
essentially a roll of "the dice."
Remember, at higher levels
gender is nonexistent.
Q: Well, the problem I am
having here is this: the
masculine religion is
monotheistic, essentially.
A: In your references.
Q: Was the older masculine
religion polytheistic?
A: Going off the track. [Which
suggests that being "on track"
would be to go in the direction
that a "masculine" religion
could worship a goddess.]
Q: The Aryans always thought
they were better than
everybody else...
A: They were more advanced
than the company they found
themselves amongst.
Q: But then, as far as I can
tell, the Hebrew monotheism
is also derived from the
Aryan, monotheistic, male
dominated religion. It then
"fathered" Christianity, and
that has been the whole
patriarchal, kill-em-all and let
God sort-em-out war
mongering thing under which
we have lived for over 2000
years. This is the Western,
European mind... it came
from the Aryans, from the
North; it was the so-called
"civilizing" influence in nearly
every respect that you can
track. The cohesiveness and
dominance of this type of
thinking was able to civilize,
but then civilization involves
dominance, killing, war,
territory, the Hitler scene, the
whole nine yards. All of this is
antithetical to all that you
promote as far as being
desirable. Yet, you have said
that you were in contact with
the Northern Peoples for
millennia. Yes, Cassiopeia is a
Northern Constellation, and
probably figured in the early
myths of these peoples in
ways we cannot know, but the
whole thing is that they
represent all that is STS.
A: But so do you, so then why
did we contact you?
Q: Well. I don't buy into that
whole monotheistic,
dominator, war-mongering,
make everybody conform to
 one way of thinking head trip!
A: So, you think all individuals
conformed then, or is it the
soul that counts in the final
analysis?
Q: Okay, obviously all
individuals are different, and
some did not conform then,
either.
A: And neither do you.
Q: Point taken. I am just
having a hard time with this. I
wish you would just tell me!
Who interacted with these
Aryans to give them this male-
dominated, monotheistic idea
that they then sought to
impose on every other human
being on the planet - and are
STILL trying!
A: Interactions were
transdensity.

Now, getting back to Atlantis: we note

that the C's have said that "Atlantis was
merely a home base of an advanced
civilisation of 3 races of humans occupying
different sections of a huge Island
empire." And here we come to the
problem of Antarctica. It is obvious from
that most amazing of artifacts, the Piri
Reis map, that there was something
unusual about Antarctica. Rand and Rose
Flem-Ath have proposed that Antarctica
was formerly in the Atlantic and was
"shifted" further south to relocate itself at
the South Pole. A lot of people like this
idea because it explains the "missing
island of Atlantis," and simultaneously
explains the existence of the Piri Reis
portolan. The C's, however, have a slightly
different "take" on that in addition to their
remarks that "Atlantis" was a global
civilization, and that we ought not to be
looking for an "island." What is more, this
explanation relates to technology that was
utilized in a way we cannot even imagine.
There was a very definite reason that
Antarctica may, indeed, have been the
Atlantean home base as suggested by the
Flem-Aths, but not quite the way they
think.

12-05-98
Q: [...] (A) Okay, this brings
us to the question about the
Piri Reis map. We wanted to
know the origin of this map?
A: Complex, but the origin
would date back to 14,000 B.
C.
Q: (A) Atlantis?
A: Close.
Q: (L) Was this map drawn
when Antarctica was NOT
covered by ice?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Was Antarctica not
covered by ice because the
poles were in a different
location?
A: No.
Q: (L) Was it not covered by
ice because the entire planet
was not covered by ice?
A: No.
Q: (L) Was it not covered by
ice because it was in a
different location itself?
A: No.
Q: (L) Why was it not covered
by ice? (A) Because the
climate was warmer.
A: Technologically achieved.
Q: (L) Why would somebody
want to technologically warm
Antarctica if the whole rest of
the planet was available for
use? What is so special about
Antarctica?
A: The whole rest of the
planet was available for use?
Not hardly.
Q: (L) Why was the rest of
the planet not available for
use?
A: Ice.
Q: (L) So, the rest of the
planet WAS covered by ice?
A: No.
Q: (L) There is something I
am missing here. (A) Much of
the planet was covered by ice,
but not all.
A: Yes.
Q: (L) So, instead of using the
areas that were NOT covered
by ice, why, in particular, was
Antarctica...
A: What?!?
Q: (L) What I am getting at
is: why go to all the trouble to
thaw out a whole big island if
it might have been easier to
have been somewhere else?
A: Well, first of all, we
thought this was Ark's turn.
But, since you have asked, is
it not obvious by now?
Magnetic power grid physics .
EM utilization. Crystals, and
the like. Seeking paths to the
interior? The "Poles" know
best! [...] EM generators
usually employ a grid. 'Tis for
field creation.
Q: (A) When you say this, you
mean A grid, not THE grid?
A: Yes. Looks like a waffle
iron.
Q: (A) You mean like a waffle
iron that is used in
transformers?
A: Okay. Why? To duplicate
nature. Earth has a web, and
so doeth thee!
Q: (A) Now, Earth's grid is
just an imaginary grid related
to field, or just a mathematic
grid... no, it must really
exist....
A: Yes.
Q: (A) If it really exists, is it a
field of grid, or is it a grid
made out of some matter, like
these waffle irons? Just field,
or matter?
A: The iron is attracted, not
attractive.
Q: (A) I wanted to know if the
 grid is a material grid, or if it
is just a grid of field and
nothing more, or if there is
something material in the
earth relating to it?
A: Both.

And here we realize that the use of EM

waves, the significator of the Pyramid
concept, was related to the "underground
bases" and that the Atlantean technology
was somehow dependent upon polar
convergence points of the magnetic grid of
the Earth. And this, of course, brings us to
that most interesting problem of the "cart
ruts" on the island of Malta which is also
famous in UFO lore for being an opening
to the "underground tunnel" system.

05-27-00
Q: (L) [...] I want to know
what is the cause of the so-
called "cart tracks" on the
island of Malta?
A: Grooves.
Q: (L) Well, I KNOW that! But
they are grooved in such a
way that they cannot possibly
be cart ruts, as they are
called. I just recently
purchased a book about the
archeology of Malta which
talks on and on about the
temples and so forth, and
then, on the very last page,
devotes a single paragraph to
the "cart ruts." This book
says:

"The enigmatic
cart ruts are too
obvious in the
Maltese rocky
landscape to be
ignored in any
work, however
concise, on
Maltese
archeology even
though they are
still not easy to
locate in the
chronological
sequence.
according to the
traditional view,
they should be
placed in
prehistory, more
precisely in the
Bronze Age, the
main argument
being that some
specimens are cut
by "Punic" tombs
and, therefore,
should be prior to
that period.

"The validity of
this argument is,
in my view, highly
questionable
particularly since
for Temi Zammit,
its originator,
'Punic' could
mean anything
from the 7th
century BC to the
3rd century AD,
especially as far
as tombs are
concerned. In my
search and study
of ancient
quarries over the
last fifteen years,
I found cart ruts
very frequently,
almost invariably,
associated with
them. The best
example is,
perhaps, the
Buskett group
which lies next to
the largest and
most important of
Malta's ancient
 quarries. For this
reason I cannot
refrain from
believing that
they were
intended for the
transportation of
construction
blocks from the
quarry face to the
road in ancient (i.
e., not
prehistoric) times.
This view is
supported by a
good number of
parallels abroad
(for instance in
Sicily, southern
France and
Greece) as well as
by their
concentration in
several areas
around Melite
which must have
required a
constant supply of
ashlar masonry
for its buildings. "

There is a single picture of the

ruts in this book. In the 1975
Lexikon der Archaeologie, the
entry under Malta reads:

"More emigrants
from Sicily came
to the island
around 3200 BC.
An astonishing
number of
megalithic
temples were
constructed
between 2800-
1900 BC. The still
extant temples,
some thirty in
number, exhibit a
 highly developed
plan and
superstructure ...
This population
possibly followed
warlike
immigrants from
western Greece...
The strange 'cart-
ruts' belong to
the same period."

Now, the problem with this

cart rut theory is the
following: When you look at
these furrows impressed in
the ground, most of them
parallel as they should be, the
natural thing is to think of
them as ruts. But, apparently,
close examination shows that
they CANNOT have been ruts
in the ordinary sense of the
word. The reason is that the
tracks of the two parallel
furrows are not only
DIFFERENT FROM RUT TO
RUT! but also vary in the
course of a single stretch!
They run through valleys,
over hills, and sometimes
exist in several "pairs" side by
side which then unite into
single two track stretches,
followed by sudden curves.
They also run off straight into
the Mediterranean. Others
end abruptly at cliff edges.
They are from 65 to 123 cm
wide. The furrows themselves
are frequently over 70 cm
DEEP! At one place, on rut
runs in a curve over a hill and
cuts 72 cm into the limestone
ground. If a cart ever ran in
these ruts, it could not have
taken a curve because of the
great depth of the ruts! Either
the axle would have vanished
in the deep imprint or the axle
must have been at least 72
cm high which would have
given the wheel a diameter of
1.5 cm. But that presents the
problem that such a large
wheel could NOT have taken
such a tight curve! It would
get stuck or break. Such
wheels that would be
necessary to navigate the
depth of the ruts could not
have maneuvered in the
narrowness of them which is
approximately 6 cm. Since
every single-axle cart has two
wheels which must run
absolutely parallel in the
furrows, we are faced with an
impossibility. Even a double
axled cart would not work
because when taking a curve,
the rear wheels have to trace
a narrower track than the
front wheels which is why
large trucks have to make a
wide swing to take a tight
curve.

At another point on the island,

four pairs of ruts join together
into one rut. They all have
different "gauges" a prior to
this union. Nearby, there is a
rut that crosses another, but
they are of different depths.
Another rut is up to 60 cm
deep, and has a width of 11
cm at the deepest point, and
20 cm at the highest. As
noted, in many places, the
ruts run straight into the
waters of the Mediterranean.
It was assumed until recently
that the ruts would end
underwater a few meters from
the coast, which would
suggest that they had
originated when the sea level
of the Mediterranean was
lower. However, divers have
discovered that the ruts
continue in the stone to great
depths below sea level.

Now, recently, a German real

estate investor who was also
a part-time archeologist,
claimed to have identified a
megaliths temple similar to
Mnajdra on the sea-bed in
Malta's territorial waters.
Supposedly, the discovery
was made by two Maltese
divers who noted the
structure during a dive on the
13th of July in 1999. They
took photographs. This was
some 3 KM off the eastern
coast of Malta. If this
discovery were
"authenticated," it would
overturn existing history as
we know it!

In order for a temple to lie

on the bed of the
Mediterranean sea, it
would have to date to the
last ice age. The implication
would then be that the
Maltese temples are at least
6,000 years older than
previously thought.

Following this announcement,

which really set the
archeologists on their ears,
there was a report printed in
the "Malta Independent" on
Sunday, November 7th, 1999
which said:

"The initial
caution and
scepticism with
which the news
was received by
local
archaeologists
would now appear
to be vindicated.
After an on-site
dive carried out
by the Museums
Department last
Friday, a
spokesman for
the Department
expressed serious
doubts that the
underwater
structures in
question have any
archaeological
importance at all,
let alone
constitute a
complete
prehistoric
temple, as
suggested by
amateur German
archaeologist Dr.
Huber Zeitlmair,
who took credit
for the discovery.
An official press
statement to this
effect is expected
to be released
shortly. :The
structures which
elicited such
widespread
interest and even
excitement were
first filmed by
local divers Shaun
and Kurt Arrigo
on an underwater
plateau some
three kilometres
east of Malta. At
its deepest point
the plateau is
over 25 metres
below sea level;
at its shallowest,
about seven
metres. Strewn
about the area
are several large
rectangular
stones which give
the impression of
fallen menhirs.
Beyond, there are
a number of what
appear to be
kidney-shaped
chambers,
bearing some
resemblance to
the apses of
above ground
temples such as
Mnajdra and
Hagar Qim.

"For Dr. Zeitlmair,

video footage was
evidence enough
to publicly assert
that the
structures
represent a
complete
megalithic
complex,
constructed at a
time when the
plateau would
have been above
sea level. the fact
that it is now
underwater could
be due to the
melting o the
polar ice caps
during the last ice
age, which would
mean that the
structures were
inundated
between 8,000
and 10,000 BC.

"The implications
are, to say the
least, dramatic.
Sadly, though, his
interpretation has
not stood up to
preliminary
investigations,
and it now
appears that what
we are dealing
with is most likely
a natural
phenomenon.
Meanwhile,
contacted
independently of
the Museums
Department,
Professor Anthony
Bonanno of the
Department of
Classics and
Archaeology at
the University of
Malta, described
the possibility of
an underwater
temple as
"extremely
improbable."

"'The fact that Dr.

Zeitlmair is part
of a society of
'Palaeoastronauts'
automatically puts
me on my
guard" , he says.
As for the theory
of an antediluvian
temple culture,
Prof. Bonanno
dismisses it out of
hand. "'Our
existing temples
have been very
reliably carbon-
dated to the
period 3,600 to
2,500 BC. In that
space of time we
 have traced a
regular evolution
in style, from the
small and
rudimentary to
the large and
complex."

The good professor then goes

on to suggest that, if the ruins
ARE validated, the only way
they could possibly have
gotten where they are is if
they were contemporary to
the ruins on the island, and
were on an adjacent part of
the island that "sank because
of a fault in the rock." So,
what it amounts to is another
discovery is being co-opted by
the authorities who
immediately pooh pooh it,
cover it up, explain it away
with their circular cerebral
gymnastics. The bottom line
is: I want to know what was
the cause of these crazy cart
ruts that cannot have been
cart ruts! They cannot
possibly be cart ruts!
A: Energy grooves.
Q: (L) What kind of energy?
A: Something like short
circuit at time of
disturbance in magnetic
field of planet.
Q: (L) Was there something
inlaid there that conducted
this energy? I mean, did this
rock melt like this because it
had lines of conductors laid
into the ground?
A: Crystal generators were
once used to collect and
redistribute cosmic and terran
energy fields.
Q: (L) How long ago were
these ruts or grooves formed?
A: 14019 years ago as you
measure it.
Q: (L) Was this before the
temple structures were built
on Malta?
A: Yes. Survivors built those.
Q: (L) These ruts are certainly
in the way. They are a definite
hazard to walking. Maybe
they filled them in with dirt
that later washed away.
A: Magnetic disturbance,
human cause.
Q: (L) What do you mean by
that? Are you saying that the
magnetic disturbance was
caused by humans, or that
the magnetic disturbance
contributed to the cause of
the ruts, and that the ruts
were caused by humans, in
such case, how did they cause
the ruts in relation to the
magnetic disturbance?
A: No. Calamities caused
magnetic disturbances.
Picture a short circuit in the
global crystal power grid.
Q: (L) So, in other words, a
global crystal power grid short
circuited due to magnetic
disturbances, and these
human constructed grid lines
all over the planet - I'm sure
they must have existed in
other places if that is the case
- did it just melt the rock?
A: Maltese condition is
somewhat unique from a
preservational standpoint.
Q: (L) Again, did the rock just
melt along these laid out grid
lines?
A: More like atomic changes
structurally.
Q: (A) I don't understand if
they were built or were they
natural lines of conduction?
Was this power grid artificial
or natural?
A: An artificial utilization of
natural energy fields.
What we discover when reading the vast
amount of "Atlantean Theories" is that
there is almost nowhere that has not been
claimed to be the site of Atlantis. But, if
we understand Atlantis as a global empire,
very similar to what we have today, then
we are easily able to accomodate all the
many theories into the whole picture. We
can then understand the role of of
Wisconsin, Antarctica, the North Atlantic,
South America, Indonesia, and the
numerous other places being claimed to
be the site of Atlantis. We also begin to
understand the true capabilities of our
ancestors, and why it simply is not
necessary to explain the so-called
"monuments" on Mars as the work of
"extraterrestrials."

Returning to the problem of Tiahuanaco.

Mainstream scholars argue that building
started around 150 BC and the city
continued to grow until the latter part of
the first millennium AD. Others - still in
the mainstream - insist that it was
probably completed by the second
millennium BC. Arthur Posnansky, an
archaeologist whose findings were
endorsed by the Bolivian government, and
Rolf Muller, a German astronomer
suggested the Kalasasaya enclosure
functioned as an astronomical
observatory, a thesis that is now widely
accepted by his peers. But Posnansky
went further. Based on the alignments of
the site, the complex must have been built
around 15,000 BC. Dr Muller checked his
calculations and cautioned that while
15,000 BC was certainly a possibility, the
astronomical findings could also point to
9300 BC.

Of course, the mainstream archaeologists

simply cannot deal with this, even though
it would solve the puzzle of why
Tiahuanaco was built as a port. There is
clear evidence that the Altiplano on which
the city is built only rose above sea level
with the ending of the Ice Age, around
8000 BC. If Tiahuanaco existed before
then, it would have functioned as a port
and would have been more or less
contemporary with Plato's lost Atlantis.
This is interesting in light of what the C's
had to say about it:

08-05-95
Q: (L) Who and what were the
Mayans?
A: The Mayans were a
trasitory people who still exist
in the lands that you refer to
as Central America. And who
have certain physical features
that are not consistent with
the rest of human beings on
3rd density Earth
environment, due to their
interactions, in the past, as
you measure time, with
beings of other density levels.
Q: (L) What beings would
those be?
A: Well, we have described
4th density STS beings on
many occasions.
Q: (L) The Lizard Beings?
A: Indeed.
Q: (L) Who was Arajuna of
Tiahuanaco?
A: Well, we believe that you
are referring to one of
approximately eight hybrids
that ruled the area currently
referred to as Central
America. Hybrids being a 4th
density to 3rd density transfer
experiment from the Lizard
race to the human race, which
was abandoned after
approximately 240 years of
experimentation by the Lizard
Beings, due to the lack of
success for sustaining physical
duplication, or reproduction of
the race. It was one of several
attempts by the Lizard Beings
to directly transmit their souls
into 3rd density environment
 for permanent placement
there. And, of course it is no
longer perceived as necessary
by them because their
intention is to rule 3rd density
beings in 4th density when
they arrive there.
Q: (L) Who built the city of
Tiahuanaco?
A: The Lizard Beings in
cooperation with humans.
Q: (L) When was it built?
A: Varying time frames since
it seems to have been
destroyed at two points. We
have to estimate an average
of 8,000 years prior to the
current time, as you measure
it.

Helena Blavatsky wrote:

In Hindu works America is

referred to as Patala, meaning
the antipodes, and Arjuna,
Krishna's disciple, is said to
have descended to Patala and
married a daughter of one of
the Nagas, or Serpents of
Wisdom.

And of course, the "serpents of wisdom"

are seen as the "civilizing good guys."
What is most interesting is that, by
following the pathway of the religious
symbolism and the art, we can see a
connection between the South American
civilizations to India and the Indus Valley
Civilization, and thence to Egypt, finally
coming to rest in Judaism and modern
Christianity based on the Egyptian
religion. All of them contain elements of
"flaying the sacrifice," worship of the sun,
fire and mountain gods, slashing the penis
as an offering to the gods (finally
becoming circumcision), and worship of
the serpent, either overt or hidden. (Recall
Moses' bronze serpent in the desert.)
We can even follow the distorted skulls of
the alien hybrid suggested above from the
Ica Skulls of Peru, to the artistic renditions
on Easter Island, to the piled up hair of
Shiva, to the elongated skull
representations of the Egyptian pharaohs
- not to mention the actual physical
distortion of the skull of Nefertiti and her
children. That King Tut's skull was
similarly deformed suggests that he was
definitely the child of Nefertiti. Earlier
representations of Akhenaten show him
with a completely normal skull
configuration, so it is clear that the
"hybrid genetics" came from Nefertiti. And
perhaps that was her "entree" to the royal
family - the "mark of the beast," so to
say. At one point, a "deformed skull" was
found that was proclaimed to have been
Akhenaten, but it later turned out to be
the mummy of a woman. The facts seem
to show that the bones of Akhenaten and
Nefertiti have never been found.

The short synopsis of the situation,

following the tracks and traces of myth
and legends, blood types and art work,
archeological and paleontological remains
and artifacts, lead to the conclusion that
the "Southern contingent," the "pyramid
people," were the Masters of Atlantis,
aided and abetted by hyperdimensional
negative beings in an attempt to take over
the world, and were defeated by the
Athenians, or the Northern contingent, the
circle people, the builders of Stonehenge
and worshippers of the Moon and the
Mother goddess. But this defeat of the
Atlanteans - keeping in mind that the
"Athenians," as part of the global culture,
can also be called "Atlanteans," just as
both France and the U.S. can be called
members of NATO - was shortlived
because it was closely followed by disaster
piled on disaster in the form of swarms of
comets, asteroids, meteorites, and an EM
disturbance of the solar system that was
so dramatic that the very planets were
jostled and seen to exchange energy
potentials.
What we conjecture from all of this is that,
at certain points in time when the
population of the planet reaches a certain
density, it is possible that, during a global
cataclysm, to utilize the energy given off
by human beings in the throes of terror
and destruction, to infuse a certain "idea
center" with its "hyperdimensional
nutriment." We noticed that the
population figure for Atlantis that the C's
gave is very similar to our present day
population, and that suggests that this
stimulation of population growth has been
deliberate. In other words, in a strange
sort of way, Gurdjieff's remark that
mankind is "food for the Moon" is not
much of a stretch if we understand it in
the context of the Moon as the "eighth
sphere" or the portal to hyperdimensional
realms.

STS forces, remember, have no power of

creativity; they cannot generate work of
their own. They need the power of the
Mother to do that. That is why they
capture women with power, keep them
half-alive so as to maintain a minimal
continuity of creative interaction and the
suitable production of form.

It is through tailored regulation of Loves'

forms that STS intelligence derives the
means of coercing soul-energy into
converting to specific psychic and
emotional coinage - Service to Self. And it
is through the cumulative psychic and
emotional energy that the STS forces hope
to obtain the energy-keys to timelocks
and spatial corridors of even richer and
still-virgin terrains, portions of the cosmos
intact with creative life, ripe for plunder
and privileged profit.

Thus, the negative being of higher

densities takes on the configuration of a
forebodingly lonely presence, lurking in
caves and desolate grottos of the
astrophysical realms. It becomes a
fiercely mental entity of 5th density power-
knowledge, possessing the proverbial
basilisk gaze and only turning the stream
of its attention "away" from that
intensified/contractile self absorption
toward the created worlds [..] imbibing
the "light units" to insure the
uninterrupted power that it needs, the
inconceivable "wattage" required, to
maintain that monumental self-absorption
and narcissistic self-luminance of the
negative Ego-postulate - the Anti-Logos,
the Selfness of Consciousness -
Ormethion. It must absorb them into itself
- it feels the necessity of undoing creation
- it NEEDS that energy to fuel its infinite
self-contemplation.

This is the Ultimate Objective of the Being

at the apex of the pyramidal food chain.
And this is why its agenda is masked in
the lower levels of the hierarchy. Until
such lower level negative beings have
consumed sufficient energy - a sort of
critical mass - to trigger the implosion of
such extraordinary self concentration,
they are only interested in destroying that
which resists their domination and
preserving a vital minimum of captured
resources so as to possess an ongoing
supply of nutriment. They wish to control,
or freeze the rate of planetary destruction
and disintegration so as to technically
conserve the intelligent life-form in a
tractable state so as to render it a good
"servant."

The Negative forces can demonstrate

remarkably far-sighted restraint. If one
group has been effectively captured and
could be completely annihilated, instead,
the game will be preserved with the
conquerors holding their positions intact,
poised to parlay their gains into even
greater negative glory of "galactic
conquest." This is just superior strategy,
trying to include as much as can be
included at once so that a comparatively
larger portion of the multidimensional
cosmos can be wiped out in the twinkling
of an eye.

And those periods of time when energy

potentials are exchanged between planets,
or between the Sun and the planets, as a
result of the disruption created by swarms
of cometary bodies, are the precise times
when such "energy transfers" are most
likely. And that brings us to the issue of
just how swarms of comets can create
such disruption.

French mathematician Henri Poincare first

blew the whistle on the "closed system"
thinking of Newtonian mechanics.
According to classical physics, Newtonian
physics, a closed system is perfectly
orderly and predictable. A pendulum in a
vacuum, free of friction and air resistance,
will conserve its energy. The pendulum
will swing back and forth for all eternity. It
will not be subject to the dissipation of
entropy, which eats its way into systems
by causing them to give up their energy to
the surrounding environment. Planets, like
pendulums, cannot be disturbed unless by
outside chance, and they must be
unvarying in their perambulations around
the sun.

But Poincare asked a question about the

stability of the solar system. Why he
asked this question, we do not know; but
he did. And the reaction to his question
was the standard linear/faith brush-off:
"Of course they are stable! They've been
stable for a long time. Heck, we can
predict eclipses years in advance!" It was
a tenet of the scientific faith that knowing
the law of force and mass of the bodies,
any good scientist could predict the
interactions with Newton's equations. The
law of force, the inverse square of the law
of gravitation, was all wrapped up in a
nice, neat package.

But Poincare had been doing some math

on the side, and he knew that there was a
small difficulty here: for a system
containing only two bodies, Newton's
equations work. For an ideal two-body
system, the orbits are stable. The problem
arises when going from two to three
bodies, such as including the Sun in the
equations, Newton's equations become
unsolvable! For formal mathematical
reasons, the three-body equation cannot
be worked out closer than an
"approximation:"

Well, one would think that an

"approximation" might be okay. We can
live with that. It's nothing to keep one
awake at night, right? Well, Poincare knew
that the approximation method appeared
to work for the first few terms added, but
when the number of terms increased, if
you add more and more bodies to the
system, even including a few spare
asteroids and their very minute
perturbations of the system, over long
periods of time, at some point the orbits
shift and the solar system begins to break
apart under its own internal forces.

Mathematically, this problem is nonlinear

and nonintegrable. When you add a term
to a two body system it increases the
nonlinear complexity, or feedback of the
system. Poincare did this, and was
satisfied that a 3 body system remained
pretty stable. Small perturbations, but so
what? With just the Sun, the Earth and
the Moon, we can sleep safely in our beds
at night. Right?

Wrong. What happened next was a shock.

Poincare discovered that with even the
very smallest perturbation, some
orbits behaved in an erratic, even
chaotic way. His calculations showed
that a minute gravitational pull from a
third body might cause a planet to
wobble and weave drunkenly in its
orbit and even fly out of the solar
system altogether! And just imagine
what a swarm of comets might do!

One will be struck by the

 complexity of this figure which
I do not even attempt to
draw. Nothing more properly
gives us an idea of
complication of the problem of
three bodies and, in general,
of all the problems in
dynamics where there is no
uniform integral. [H. Poincare
quoted by M. Schroeder in
Fractals, Chaos, Power
Laws]

Poincare had discovered that chaos is the

essence of the nonlinear system. He
revealed that even a completely
deterministic system like our solar system
could do crazy things with the least
provocation. The smallest effects could
be magnified through positive
feedback and a simple system can
explode into shocking complexity.

And that seems to be what happened

then, and what is before us in the not-too-
distant future. And this brings us back to
our own civilization as the reincarnation of
Atlantis with the United States as the
"central Atlantean power" that seeks to
conquer the world economically and
otherwise:

07-16-94
Q: Why is this happening to
us? [Referring to the idea of
alien abductions and genetic
engineering, earth changes,
and general global mayhem.]
A: Karma.
Q: (L) What kind of Karma
could bring this?
A: Atlantis.
Q: (L) What can protect us?
A: Knowledge.
Q: (L) How do we get this
knowledge?
A: You are being given it now.

07-18-98
Q: (L) I would like to know if
you could comment on what
we were discussing earlier,
the purported idea of mans'
destruction of the planet. This
is, of course, a disturbing
aspect of mankind, but I
wonder if mankind is as guilty
as he is made to feel?
A: Mankind, so called, is one
element of creation.
Q: (L) When you say 'one
element of creation' in
relation to the question about
man's destruction of the
planet, are you saying that
this so-called destruction can,
in a sense, be considered to
be creative?
A: The "destruction" is merely
one segment of all that exists
in a long wave cycle.
Q: (T) Basically, man is doing
what he is supposed to be
doing, whether we know it or
not. [...] (L) Now, one
question that we were
discussing earlier is: how can
the close approach of the
companion star cause an
increase in the Sun's gravity
when there is no reason why
it should change anything
since gravity is a function of
mass?
A: But do you rally know all
there is to know about
gravity?
Q: (A) No, we don't know.
But, does this mean that this
will be an effect that does not
follow from the theory of
gravity that we know already?
A: Gravity is the life force that
binds all realities as one.
Q: (L) What are the
mechanics of the increase in
the Sun's gravity? What is
going to cause this?
A: In order to understand
this, you would need a
reworking of the theorem.
Q: (L) Can you help us in this
reworking of the theorem?
A: Waves.
Q: (A) What I want to ask is:
we have Einstein's theory of
gravity, and the question is
whether the effect of
increasing the Sun's gravity is
something that goes beyond
Einstein's equations or not?
A: You must see the wave.
Q: (A) What wave, a
gravitational wave, or an
electromagnetic wave, or
some other wave? What
wave?
A: Arkadiusz, how do these
intersect?
Q: (A) Gravity and
electromagnetic?
A: Yes. And others.
Q: (A) How they are described
within a theory, or how they
intersect in space when they
come together?
A: Both.
Q: (A) Okay, why does this
increase in the Sun's gravity
have anything to do with
electromagnetism? We were
told that the Brown star will
not radiate any radiation, so,
in particular, no
electromagnetic radiation. So,
where does electromagnetics
come in? I do not
understand...
A: Gravitational pull incites
electromagnetic impulse.
Q: (A) Okay, that means we
go beyond gravitational
theory, and this is part of
Unified Field Theory?
A: Yes, exactly!! The complete
UFT was withheld from you!
Q: (L) I think they mean
humanity in general...
A: Yes.
Q: (T) So, the complete UFT is
known to someone here on
the planet?
A: Yes.
Q: (T) And they are not
making it available...
A: Oh no, because "The Truth
Will Set You Free!"
Q: (J) From gravity!
A: You may access
hyperspatial truths with UFT.
Q: (A) Is it a good time for
me to know more on that, to
work on that? Can you give
me a pointer so that I can
discover it for myself?
A: Back up to where you were
in "69."
Q: (T) You must have been
looking into something in
1969... you were a young'n
then and didn't know you had
stumbled onto something. (A)
I was reading books by
Lichnerowicz on UFT...
A: Yes. Check the notes.
Q: (L) Well, we have a REAL
problem with these notes and
papers and things because of
the fact that the bags that
they were packed in have
disappeared!
A: Gee, we wonder why?!?
Q: (L) If we make a stink
about these bags, will we get
them back?
A: No. Wait to see if they
arrive.
Q: (L) We have been waiting
a year! Well, there was a lot
of stuff for them to go
through... we'll have to wait
awhile!
A: Even without notes, the
lonely young man walks down
the concrete walk with the
clumsily arranged light poles,
contemplating the truth, the
REAL truth. You were in an
alpha state, a crossroads,
wondering "where do I go
from here?" "And why are all
these things being pushed
onto me?" Go back to then,
Arkady. You know you are
really a "Russian" at heart!
Q: (A) Well, we started with
the increased mass of the
Sun, and we came to UFT
which is hidden from us
because it would make us
free; there is this tendency in
me to follow this road because
it is science and would open a
new road. The question is
whether such activity or
knowing such things will lead
to other densities? Is it just
for satisfaction, or is there
real value in knowing more in
this direction?
A: Well, the Unified Field
Theory unlocks the door
completely to the higher
densities.
Q: (T) But there are parts of
this that have yet to be
discovered by the general
research books because it is
being kept secret?
A: No.
Q: (T) Has science
acknowledged that gravity is a
wave, as something that can
be measured, quantitative?
A: Controversy.
Q: (L) What gravity is and
what it is not is a controversy.
(T) But if gravity is part of the
UFT, and somebody knows
what it is... (L) They are
building HAARP. (T) I think
there is more to it than this
HAARP. UFT is a major step...
A: Grids.
Q: (L) What kind of grids...
(T) They keep jumping off...
wait a minute...
A: We are not "jumping off."
Q: (L) What kind of grids?
A: The planet has been
enshrouded with EM grid.
Q: (T) Are these the ley lines?
A: No.
Q: (L) Are they artificially
generated?
A: Contoured.
Q: (L) They are artificially
contoured. What is the result
of this shrouding?
A: Manipulated for use by
3rd/4th Consortium.
Q: (A) What kind of EM grid?
(L) The natural EM grid is
being contoured...
A: Like a gently waving
geometric "blanket."
Q: (T) Is it on the surface of
the planet, through the
planet, or where?
A: Above.
Q: (J) Do microwave towers
factor into this?
A: Indirectly discovered by
same principal. [person?]
Q: (A) Who is this principal? A
name? (T) The gravity waves,
whether they exist or not, are
a controversy, yet they are
part of the UFT, and someone
already knows how it works.
Therefore, it is only
controversy to those who
don't know what the answer
is, and it is not a controversy
to those who know. They
know what it is and how to
measure it and how to use it.
A: Of course.
Q: (T) So, it is only a
controversy that is allowed to
be. (L) Or created. (A) Some
power is used to sustain this
grid. What is it?
A: Land and space based
generators.
Q: (T) What can it be used
for?
A: Multiple uses.
Q: (L) Well, what are the top
three, for example?
A: No "top three."
Q: (T) Just an example, give
us an idea? How does this
affect us?
A: Broaden concept.
Q: (T) Can this grid be used
by other objects as a power
source? (J) Can it be tapped
into?
A: Net.
Q: (L) It is a net that traps
things?
A: Broaden.
Q: (L) It is a net that...
A: Calculates...
Q: (J) Internet? (T) Is it like a
big fence to keep us in?
A: You are dancing on the 3rd
density ballroom floor. "Alice
likes to go through the looking
glass" at the Crystal Palace.
Atlantean reincarnation surge
brings on the urge to have a
repeat performance.
Q: (T) The Atlanteans who
have reincarnated are getting
ready to do the same thing
they did before with the
crystals. So, this is an
Atlantean type thing that is
being done now? Different
equipment, but the same type
of thing?
A: All lessons must be learned
before you can move onto
bigger and better things.
Q: (L) Is that a general
statement about the
Atlanteans repeating the
lessons, or that once we learn
this lesson, we can move onto
bigger and better things in
counteracting this grid?
A: All that is present and
future too.
Q: (T) Well, maybe it is a
defensive shield that has been
put up to protect us since we
have monkeyed with the
ozone so much...
A: No. Better to contemplate
and meditate. No linear
thinking please, you know
better.
Q: (J) I think they just
slapped your hand. (A) I want
to ask if there is something
that we can and should do
about this grid for ourselves?
A: Why? To know was all you
need.
Q: (A) Well, it was said that
this was for the purpose of
control and manipulation. So,
knowing is all that we need.
Or, we could try to shield...
(L) But, to know IS the shield.
I don't know how that works,
but it seems to be so.
A: Yes.
Q: (A) Now, how did we come
to this grid from UFT?
A: Grid construction
represents application of...
Q: (L) Somehow we went
from the increased gravity of
the Sun, to UFT, to the grid...
A: UFT explains the
"increased" gravity of Sol.
But, is there not something in
UFT about increase/
decrease???
Q: (A) There is no reason for
it to increase or decrease...
but this is Einstein's theory
which we were told is
incorrect... (L) Well, maybe it
is speed? When two things are
rotating in tandem, when they
come together, wouldn't it
increase their speed, and
doesn't speed increase
gravity? (A) No, we were told
that there is some interaction
between gravity and EM
wave, and this is what UFT is
about... If we use other
dimensions which we are
supposed to use in this UFT,
going with Kaluza-Klein, then
the very concept of mass is
something which is not so
clear, and mass can be
variable...
A: Yes, variability of
physicality.
Q: (T) Fourth density. (A) We
were told earlier that this UFT
opens the door to other
densities...
A: Yes.
[...]
Q: (A) Can we have a UFT
which unifies EM and gravity
and does not include the
concept of other densities. In
other words, can we put in a
textbook all about the gravity
and electromagnetics, and a
student could learn all of this
and still know nothing about
other densities?
A: No. Other densities become
apparent when...
Q: (A) So, it means that
Einstein and Von Neumann
knew about these other
densities?
A: Yes, oh yes!!!
Q: (T) Just a thought: having
UFT and being able to
manipulate different fields
within it, creates different
effects. So, as we understand
it in the apparent present
state of science, we have to
spin something in space in
order to create gravity. But,
with the UFT, one small
offshoot is that one could
create real gravity without
spinning anything. So, the
problem of weightlessness is
really already solved...
A: Elementary my dear Terry,
elementary.
Q: (T) So, this whole thing
with the space station and all
the trouble they are having
 readapting to gravity when
they come back, is all a
game...
A: When you "let the cat out
of the bag," you create an
entire feline "nation."
Q: (T) So, we are capable of
"Star Trek" right now?
A: In a sense, but there is so
much more than that.
Q: (T) Of course. Most people
would say that 'cutting edge'
science is 25 years ahead of
what we see, and I say it is
more like a hundred years,
and I am even off? Cutting
edge science on this planet is
more like 3 or 4 hundred
years ahead?
A: More like 30 to 40,000
years "ahead!"
Q: (L) Is that because of 4th
density influence and
information?
A: Yes.
Q: (T) 30 to 40 thousand
years? Let me get that
number right...
A: Yes, at least.

This, of course, brings us back to our

problem: what to do?

07-25-98
Q: (L) I read the new book by
Dr. David Jacobs, professor of
History at Temple University,
concerning his extensive
research into the alien
abduction phenomenon. [Dr.
Jacobs wrote his Ph.D. thesis
on the history of the UFOs.]
Dr. Jacobs says that now,
after all of these years of
somewhat rigorous research,
that he KNOWS what the
aliens are here for and he is
afraid. David Jacobs says that
producing offspring is the
primary objective behind the
abduction phenomenon. Is
this, in fact, the case?
A: Part, but not "the whole
thing."
Q: (L) Is there another
dominant reason?
A: Replacement.
Q: (L) Replacement of what?
A: You.
Q: (L) How do you mean?
Creating a race to replace
human beings, or abducting
specific humans to replace
them with a clone or
whatever?
A: Mainly the former. You see,
if one desires to create a new
race, what better way than to
mass hybridize, then mass
reincarnate. Especially when
the host species is so forever
ignorant, controlled, and
anthropocentric. What a
lovely environment for total
destruction and conquest and
replacement... see?
Q: (L) Well, that answered my
other question about the
objective. Well, here in the
book, Dr. Jacobs says that
there is ongoing abductions
through particular families. I
quote:

'Beyond
protecting the
fetus, there are
other reasons for
secrecy. If
abductions are, as
all the evidence
clearly indicates,
an
intergenerational
phenomenon in
which the children
of abductees are
themselves
abductees, then
one of the aliens'
goals is the
generation of
more abductees.
Are all children of
abductees
incorporated into
the phenomenon?
The evidence
suggests that the
answer is yes. If
an abductee has
children with a
non-abductee, the
chances are that
all their
descendants will
be abductees.
This means that
through normal
population
increase, divorce,
remarriage and so
on, the abductee
population will
increase quickly
throughout the
generations.
When those
children grow and
marry and have
children of their
own, all of their
children, whether
they marry an
abductee or non-
abductee, will be
abductees. To
protect the
intergenerational
nature of the
breeding
program, it must
be kept secret
from the
abductees so that
they will continue
to have children.
If the abductees
KNEW that the
program was
 intergenerational,
they might elect
not to have
children. This
would bring a
critical part of the
program to a halt,
which the aliens
cannot allow. The
final reason for
secrecy is to
expand the
breeding
program, to
integrate laterally
in society, the
aliens must make
sure that
abductees mate
with non-
abductees and
produce abductee
children.'

Now, this seems to suggest

that there is a particular
bloodline that is susceptible
to...
A: We have told you before:
the Nazi experience was a
"trial run," and by now you
see the similarities, do you
not?
Q: (L) Yes, I do see...
A: Now, we have also told you
that the experience of the
"Native Americans" vis a vis
the Europeans may be a
precursor in microcosm. Also,
what Earthian 3rd density
does to Terran 2nd density
should offer "food for
thought." In other words,
thou are not so special,
despite thy perspective, eh?
And we have also warned that
after conversion of Earth
humans to 4th density, the
Orion 4th density and their
allies hope to control you
"there." Now put this all
together and what have you?
At least you should by now
know that it is the soul that
matters, not the body. Others
have genetically, spiritually
and psychically manipulated/
engineered you to be
bodycentric. Interesting, as
despite all efforts by 4th
through 6th density STO, this
"veil remains unbroken."
Q: (L) Now, the big question
is: what are we supposed to
DO with this information?
A: As with all else, it is not
what you should do with it, it
is just that you have it.
Q: (L) Is there any possibility
of defeating the plans of the
4th density STS in this
project?
A: Is there any possibility of
defeating the Spanish
Conquistadores and the
English, French, Dutch and
German "colonists?"
Q: (F) Did they say what I
think they said? (L) Yes. That
is inexpressibly depressing.
A: And you expected a Rose
Garden?
Q: (L) If that's the way it is,
why don't we all join the
Heaven's Gate cult and
commit mass suicide and just
not deal with all this stuff?!
A: You chose to "deal with it,"
now did you not?
Q: (L) Well, was I in my right
mind when I made that
choice, or had I been
drinking?
A: No drinking on 5th density!
Q: (L) Now, I have been
having an exchange with
Carla McCarty who was the Ra
channel. She says that we are
not supposed to DO anything,
we are just supposed to BE,
and what we are supposed to
BE is to just let love flow
through us, love the aliens
and everybody and just sort
of relax in the tulips and, if
they take us over, then we
should LOVE that, too.
Somehow, I don't find this...
A: All there is is lessons!!
Q: (L) Is the lesson to learn
how to give up the ghost with
panache? What's the point?
A: Your experiences never
end, only transform. No
bodycentrics need apply.
Q: (L) Well, you once said
something about the
transition to 4th density
creating a 'level playing field.'
Then, the people will wake up
and there will be a battle
between the humans and
aliens...
A: Yes.
Q: (L) And if it is a more level
playing field, then the
situation would not quite be
the same as the
Conquistadores against the
Aztecs and the Native
Americans against the
Europeans and...
A: Wrong, all in that drama
were at 3rd density. The
rabbits, rats, dogs, etc. are
not on a level playing field
with you!
Q: (L) Do the aliens know
about the upcoming comets
and all that sort of thing?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) And they have the idea
that what they are doing, this
race they are creating, is
going to survive this
cataclysmic activity?
A: Of course.
Q: (L) Is that 'of course' as in
they ARE going to survive, or
that they BELIEVE they are
going to survive?
A: Both.
Q: (L) Okay, you once told us
that this was like a 'cosmic
battle.' That the cycle was
going to create balance and
so on. I am trying to
understand this. If that is the
case, it seems that there is
more to it than the
Conquistadores against the
Aztecs and the Europeans
against the Native Americans;
that at some point the story
changes - the oppressed fight
back - I am trying to get the
allegory into a more
understandable framework.
Do you see what I mean?
A: No.
Q: (L) Well, that is because I
am confused. What I am
trying to ask without asking it
directly is: what chance do we
have of doing anything?
A: You are still not seeing the
"bigger picture."
Q: (L) What is the bigger
picture?
A: Your souls, your
consciousness.
Q: (L) So, in other words, we
chose to come in at this
particular point in time to
experience this mass takeover
of our planet and the
conquest and destruction of
the human race, just so we
could have this experience,
check- out and reincarnate?
A: No.
Q: (L) Well, that is what it
sounds like! You say that the
only thing that really matters
is our souls, our
consciousness, so if we tend
to our souls and our bodies
check out, then obviously the
answer is to a) reincarnate, or
b) move to the next density
and reincarnate. What other
option is there?
A: How long did you expect to
"live?"
Q: (L) Well, under the normal
circumstance, 70 or 80 years,
optimistically.
A: And is that long?
Q: (L) No, it is not. By cosmic
standards it is a whiff of
vapor. What are you getting
at here?
A: Think about it. ? Have you
had any contemporaries who
transited to 5th density?
Q: (L) Yes.
A: How come? How can this
be possible?
Q: (L) Because they died. The
body died.
A: Why?
Q: (L) Because that is what
bodies do.
A: But is it "fair?"
Q: (L) Is it fair?! I guess if
that is what they choose.
A: And...
Q: (L) I don't know where you
are going with this!
A: You seem to be under the
impression that only "good"
experiences are acceptable.
Q: (L) No, I am not under the
impression that only good
experiences are acceptable,
but I AM in a little bit of a
quandary here because, here
we are talking to you guys
who are supposed to be 'us' in
the future. Here we are in this
period of time on this planet,
where things are in a very
strange state. There is some
kind of huge transition going
on, and I am just wondering
what is the whole point. Why
are we talking to you? What's
the point?
A: It is the lesson. Do you not
understand still? The lesson,
the lessons, that is all there
is. They are all immeasurably
valuable.
Q: (L) Okay, we are having
these lessons. You have told
us what is going on. We see it
going on around us. I am
convinced that what you have
said is so from a LOT of other
circumstantial evidence as
well as the research of others
who have come to the same
conclusion and, DAMN IT, IT'S
UGLY! DO YOU UNDERSTAND
ME?! IT'S UGLY!
A: That is your perspective.
Q: (L) Well, as C** said on
the phone the other day, what
are we supposed to awaken
to? Are we supposed to just
awaken to the fact that we
can SEE all this stuff going
on?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) And just waking up and
seeing it is the whole thing?
Okay, once we wake up and
SEE it, why can't we just
check out at that point? If you
know what the script is, you
don't have to watch the
movie!
A: But then you miss out on
the experience.
Q: (L) So, we are all here to
experience being munched
and crunched...
A: No.
Q: (L) Imprisoned, controlled,
being treated like rats in a
cage in a laboratory...
A: Ecstasy, remember?
Q: (L) Ecstasy?! WELL SWELL!
We can just ALL be BURNED
AT THE STAKE! I understand
that is QUITE an ECSTATIC
experience! I'm sure William
Wallace felt perfectly ecstatic
when they castrated him and
removed his bowels and
burned them in a brazier in
front of his face!
A: Not so long ago, your face
smashed upon the
pavement...
Q: (L) Was that an ecstatic
experience?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) So, when you say
'ecstatic' you could just be
talking about jumping out a
window and croaking?! You
gotta understand here! The
perspective here on 3rd
density! You don't have faces
to smash on pavements!
A: Neither will/do you/us.
Q: (A) You say knowledge
protects. It protects against
WHAT?
A: Many things. One example:
post transformational trauma
and confusion.
Q: (L) So, knowledge is going
to protect us against post
transformational trauma and
confusion. You are saying that
this transition to 4th density is
going to be traumatic and
confusing. Do you mean
transformation from 3rd to
4th density, or 3rd to 5th
density, i.e. death?
A: Both.
Q: (L) So, if one does not
have the shock and trauma
and the confusion and so
forth, one is then able to
function better?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Well, if a person
transitions directly from 3rd to
4th density without cycling
through 5th density via dying,
that implies that persons can
transition directly from 3rd to
4th density without dying. Is
that correct?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) How does that feel?
How is that experience...
A: Alice through the
looking glass.
Q: (A) Okay, they say that
knowledge is supposed to
protect from trauma and
confusion. On the other hand,
all is lessons, so trauma is a
lesson. Why are we supposed
to work to avoid a lesson?
A: You are correct, it is a
lesson, but if you have
foreknowledge, you are
learning that lesson early, and
in a different way.
Q: (L) So, if you learn the
lesson in a different way, does
that mitigate the need or the
way or the process of the way
of learning at the time of
transition?
A: Yes. Smoother.
Q: (L) I do have to say that
thinking about it all, not being
able to do anything about it,
not being able to talk to
people about it because they
don't believe, is certainly
more painful than being hit by
the shock of it...
A: No.
Q: (L) Well, you are
suggesting that I CAN tell
others such things?
A: You can convey, but
suggest it be done in a subtle
fashion.
Q: (L) Well, how subtle can it
be? I mean, 'hello folks, you
know the words munch,
crunch, yum yum???'
A: It is not all that way, and
you know it! Most are not
eaten, just manipulated.
Knowledge protects in the
most amazing ways.
Mathematics are "taught' in
your realm in such a way that
only a select few will learn.
And mathematics is the
language of all creation. For
example, advanced math
studies, such as algebra,
provide the keys to unlocking
the doors between the matter
and antimatter universes.
Suggest those present who
still need to, learn algebra.
Q: (L) Okay, you suggest that
those present learn algebra...
A: Who need to.
Q: (L) Are you saying that we
can unlock doors between
matter and anti-matter
universes? Is that what you
are getting at here?
A: Maybe...
Q: (L) I certainly don't want
to hang out on this planet
after it is taken over by aliens
and everybody is getting
munched!
A: Munched? Please!!
Q: (A) I want to refer to the
previous session when we
were talking about UFT and
you said that I should go back
to 1969. I tried to remember
what, in particular, in 1969,
what was the crossroads? I
couldn't remember anything.
Can I have some clue: what
was it? Which month?
A: August.
Q: (A) Was it in Wroclaw?
A: Yes. Lodz.
Q: (A) That is the town where
my brother is living. Perhaps,
yes... I was there in 1969.
Yes, that is true. I want to
know about the remark saying
'Russian at heart?'
A: You studied it, you
interacted with amazing
people... Hamburg...
Q: (A) Yes, that is true, but
why is it relevant?
A: The doors are opened to
revelation by contemplating
the past which is really the
present.
Q: (A) Now, is this mention of
'Russian,' and going to
Hamburg related to research I
was doing in Hamburg?
A: Reading Russian books
about pertinent theoretical or
hypothetical principles?
Hamburg? Research? Yes, but
that is a clue and all we can
give you, lest you miss the
opportunity to discover
something truly important.
Q: (L) Okay, we'll work on it.
A: Pathway by the lightpoles,
Arkadiusz...

06-22-96
Q: (L) One of the crop circles
you interpreted was an
"astronomical twin
phenomenon." What is an
astronomical twin
phenomenon?
A: Many perfectly
synchronous meanings.
Q: (L) Synchronicity is
involved. Does this have
something to do with
"image?"
A: Duplicity of, as in "Alice
through the looking glass."
Q: (L) Double images. Does
this relate to matter and
antimatter?
A: Yes, and...
Q: (L) Gravity and
manifesting on one side and
manifesting a mirror image on
the other...
A: Yes, and... [...]
Astronomical.
Q: (L) Okay, that relates to
stars and planets...
astronomical in terms of
another universe, an alternate
universe composed of
antimatter?
A: Yes, and....
Q: (L) And is this alternate
universe going to merge with
our universe...
A: No.
Q: (L) Is this alternate
universe of antimatter the
point from which phenomena
occur or are manifested in our
universe?
A: More like doorway or
"conduit."
Q: (L) Is this alternate
universe the means by which
we must travel to 4th density?
Is it like a veil, or an abyss of
some sort?
A: Think of it as the highway.
Q: (L) So, we must travel
through this universe of
antimatter in order to reach
4th density?
A: No.
Q: (L) Is something going to
happen in terms of interacting
with this antimatter in order
to bring about some sort of
transition?
A: No. Realm Border is
traveling wave.
Q: (L) Okay, you say
"traveling wave," and then
you say that antimatter is the
highway. Does this mean
moving through antimatter or
interacting in some way with
antimatter via the the impetus
of the traveling wave, or
realm border?
A: Bends space/time, this is
where your unstable gravity
waves can be utilized.
Q: (L) Utilizing antimatter by
creating an EM field, which
destabilizes the gravity wave,
allows antimatter to unite with
matter, creating a portal
through which space/time can
be bent, or traveled through
via this "bending." In other
words, producing an EM field,
bringing in the antimatter, IS
the bending of space/time? Is
that it?
A: Yes.
Q: (V) Is there a portal for
each person, or one large
portal?
A: No.
Q: (V) So we move through a
portal in masses?
A: No.
Q: (L) Is this generating of EM
fields to destabilize the
gravity wave what the HAARP
assembly is designed and built
for?
A: No.
Q: (V) If there are not
personal portals for one
person, or portals for groups
of people...
A: Portal is where you desire
it to be.
Q: (V) So it could just be a
state of mind?
A: No. With proper
technology you can create
a portal where desired.
There are unlimited
options.

12-05-98
Q: (A) I want to ask about
this grid business. I have this
book with this 'sacred
geometry' business, Bruce
Cathie and all that. These
people draw these grids with
geometric shapes that differ
from simple meridians. I
would like to know how to find
out what is the true geometry
of this grid? Is it as
complicated as they draw it,
or is it as simple as longitude
and latitude? Can I have some
help with this?
A: Seek answers in the
pyrotechnics.
Q: (L) Do you mean having to
do with explosives or
fireworks?
A: All that is related to the
root. For example: lightning.
Q: (L) Yes, but what we are
asking is how to SHAPE, to
construct a correct grid! Is
there a particular geometric
figure that applies, and are
there particular locations ...
A: No, no, no. You are
assuming, and you are not
being patient.
Q: (A) I don't understand
what this pyrotechnics is
about, but first question: at
some point we were asking
about this magnetic grid, and
we were told that the grid
lines are located about every
200 miles, and that it is a
regular pattern of lines...
A: Yes, but those are primary.
What happens at the poles?
Q: (A) At the poles, these
lines converge, and the
pattern becomes more
complex, I suspect.
A: Convergence.
Q: (A) Okay, they converge at
the poles, and probably go
inside.
A: In atmosphere, there is
undulation. At core, there is
primary convergence, and
that is also your doorway/
bridge.
Q: (A) Core of the Earth?
A: Yes.
Q: (A) These lines that are
being drawn, are they just
one dimensional lines, or are
they a plane that crosses the
Earth along these lines?
A: Latter.
Q: (A) Well, I wanted to make
sure because, when we were
directed to this place in Russia
and the term 'magnetic
meridian' was brought up, and
we asked the question as to
 where the zero magnetic
meridian was located, we
were told that it was at about
90 degrees East longitude in
the Western Pacific ocean. We
checked the map and it is
clearly the Indian Ocean and
not the Western Pacific. Was
this just a mistake?
A: No because all those
lovely, shimmering oceans
intersect around a lovely
island with really inexpensive
real estate!
Q: (A) They are joking! They
act like they drank too much!
I have no idea what that
means! [Laura stops and gets
the Atlas and examines the
area in question.] (L) Okay,
the only island I can see that
those lovely shimmering
oceans intersect around, in
the terms in which you have
expressed it, is Antarctica.

And in the following excerpt, unpublished

thus far, we find some clues to the
"mission" and the possibilities, not to
mention the current situation.

07-28-01
Q: [Laughter] Well let me ask
you this: Am I right to be so
upset with Vincent and his
damned ritual magic stuff?
A: Yes.
Q: Am I right in my thinking
that even if he is not
conscious of it, he was sent as
an agent to extract
information from me?
A: Yes.
Q: Are the Cassiopaeans the
ones that got in contact with
him in his childhood and then
when he was older [as he
claims]?
A: No.
Q: Is he consciously working
as an agent?
A: No.
[...] [These next remarks
about Maynerd Most will be
made clear in the Adventures
series.]
Q: Where did that stuff about
the "Percival 3" come from
when Vincent was here?
A: Vincent.
Q: Is there really something
hidden in the "Lair of Titus?"
A: No.
Q: Is there really going to be
a 2010 Space war?
A: No.
Q: Are we really supposed to
build some kind of thing to
shield the earth in 2010?
A: No.
Q: Are we supposed to build
some kind of technology for
SOME reason?
A: Yes. Later.
[...] [Interestingly, the
following remarks about Frank
Scott proved to be stunningly
correct, though we had no
idea at the time how the
scenario would ultimately play
out.]
Q: I want to know what
"Frank" is up to?
A: Sorry he left. Listened.
Q: (A) Who is sorry? (L) Who
did he listen to?
A: Mark.
Q: I see. Is my brother mad
at me, too?
A: No.
Q: (L to A) I stay in trouble all
the time. The only one who
doesn't get mad at me is you.
A: Frank. [Obviously, the
point was that Frank was
either mad at me at the time,
or was going to get mad at
me via the manipulations of
Most.]
[...]
Q: Well, what else can I ask
to get a non-answer?
A: Yes. 5 million.
Q: 5 million questions I can
ask to get a non-answer. I
see.
A: Voila! Joy! Now Learn!
Q: (A) Was that a joke? (L) In
other words, learning is fun?
A: FUN!
Q: It might be fun for you
guys; however, there's certain
things about this 3 D
environment, like when you
kick rocks, it hurts; and when
you spend more money than
you have, you go into debt.
A: But it is more fun that way.
Q: Are we supposed to move
to France?
A: Yes.
Q: Are you sure?
A: Yes.
Q: When will we move to
France?
A: 2003.
[...]
Q: Are we supposed to DO
something in France?
A: Yes.
Q: What?
A: More work.
Q: Well, SWELL! [...] Okay.
So we're going to move to
France and do more work?
A: U 5.
Q: "U 5?!" Us and the three
kids?
A: 8835 million. [...] Hope
and glory is coming close!
[...] Point the way to love in
realms of light. Trust on it.
[....]
Q: I want to know why so
many things were told to us in
code when Frank was
present?
A: Frank is a Mole.
Q: (A) If Frank was a mole,
why did he leave?
 A: STS looks at his own time
to hook onto zone of sail
soon.
Q: (L) Are you saying that
STS... I don't know how to
put it. Why did he leave? Was
he trying to get information
and he couldn't get it, and
then they decided to pull him
out, so that if he couldn't get
it, I couldn't get it either?
A: Soon to answer itself.
[...]
Q: What was it that we know
that Frank couldn't know?
A: How to build a prototype.
Q: Prototype of what?
A: Demolecularizer.
Q: Demolecularizer? Cool!

And so, we come to the idea that

Knowledge Protects - but only when
information becomes knowledge by being
Utilized. And in the following excerpts,
there are clues to this Utilization:

10-04-97
Q: I have a few questions on
the subject of Cassiopaea. On
several occasions you have
described Cassiopaea or the
Cassiopaeans, the unified
thought form light beings that
transmit through Cassiopaea,
as being the 'front line of the
universe's system of natural
balance.' On another occasion
when R*** was here, she was
asking questions about Isis
and you said that Isis was a
'vanguard.' Now, it seems to
me that something that is at
the front line is also a
vanguard - that the definitions
are interchangeable, or
similar. In reading through all
the various myths and
legends, it occurs to me that
the similarity between the
imagery of Queen Cassiopaea
and Isis is quite striking. What
is the relationship between
Queen Cassiopaea,
archetypally speaking, and
Isis?
A: Subliminal.
Q: It is subliminal? The other
thing I noticed about the word
'Isis' is that it can be slightly
altered to make 'I Zeus.' And,
Perseus can be 'per Zeus' and
Persia can be made to say
'per ziu.' One of the oldest
etymological roots for the
word 'God' is 'ziu' from which
we get 'deu.' These all
represent the English
traslation of 'for God,' with
Perceval being 'per ziu val' or
'strong for God.' Could you
comment on these
relationships?
A: Interconnected by trilingual
learning curve.
Q: Any further comments?
A: No.
Q: I also noticed that the
word 'Osiris' could also be
slightly modified to say 'of
Sirius.' Comment, please.
A: Sirius was regarded highly
in your "past."
Q: What was the foundation
of this regard for Sirius?
A: "From whence cometh, is
seen that which knows no
limitation."
Q: Could you elaborate on
that?
A: Could, but will not.
Q: Why?
A: Because you can!

08-17-00
Q: Well, you have talked
about the Wave before, and I
complained that we did not
have time to do certain things
that you had suggested that
we do. You said that, yes we
would, and that these things
were suggested to "prepare"
us for this event. Just trying
to deal with it from a linear
point of view, we still have to
build this pool with the
columns, get a Nobel prize,
supposedly, work with people
on the crop circles, and all
that. Are we still looking at
doing these things in this
linear time progression that
we exist in; that we are aware
of as small children on a very
large plane?
A: If you let it flow, it will
flow.
Q: So, you are us in the
future, we are you in the past
- when you say this, are you
"us" in the future in the sense
of ALL mankind, or in the
sense of any particular group
of mankind?
A: In between those limited
options.
Q: Could you be more
explicit?
A: No, because you wold not
"get it."
Q: When I post material on
the website, those people who
resonate to the material
believe that this refers to
them also. I have been of the
opinion that Unified Thought
Form being must mean a very
large group as represented in
this density. I know that we
are dealing with limiting
terms. But, is this applied to
people who CHOOSE the
Cassiopaean option?
A: Maybe it is best to say it
applies to those who
recognize the application.
Q: So, if they recognize it, if
they know it is them, they are
part of it. (A) But, thinking in
nonlinear terms, its up to us
to work to make this precise.
You are asking this question
which implies that the answer
exists. But, exactly what the
answer is may be it is not yet
chosen, and it is up to us to
make it this way.
A: Lodestar is a clue for you.
Q: I guess that means a
guiding star of some sort.
Something that attracts... a
lodestone is magnetic, it is
where the compass points. In
the myth, Cassiopaea, Danae,
and Athena work together to
enable Perseus to cut off the
head of the Gorgon and kill
the sea monster and rescue
Andromeda. Of all the
mythical heroes, Perseus
stands out because he was
SUCCESSFUL. He went on the
quest, he succeeded in the
mission, he freed the maiden
in distress, killed a slew of
Lizzie types, balanced the
situation in his environment,
and then even lived happily
ever after. He didn't lose his
reason, he didn't fail... it is
about the only really
successful myth. He DID it.
And did it well. Is that...
A: A quest is successfully
followed one step at a time.
No need to gauge the
staircase.

06-07-97

Q: What is the symbology of

the 'breaking of rocks,' as in
the alchemical texts, as well
as related to Perseus as 'he
who breaks?'
A: Occurs at a time when
rocks break, as in the
electromagnetic impulses
that emanate from
earthbound rocks when
sheared by tectonic forces,
and much more
importantly, the possible
utilization of said forces
whether naturally or
otherwise induced.

08-20-01
Q: Is the story of David a
gloss of the Perseus legend?
A: Yes. More than that
though.
Q: Okay, can you tell me what
it is more than that?
A: A Tale of 4th Density.
Q: So it's interactive in the
sense of groups, not
individuals?
A: Yes.
Q: Where is the "Ethiopia" of
the Cassiopeia story? Where it
is today?
A: 4th Density.
Q: Okay, what people did it
refer to, in a larger group
sense, if it was an archetypal
expression?
A: Gaul. [...]
Q: What is important about
"White House?"
A: Future Hit 4th density.
Q: Future what 4th density?
A: Hit.
Q: (L) What is important
about white house.
A: Go to 4th density through
there.
Q: What does white house
actually mean? Is it a
building, or does it have an
esoteric meaning?
A: Genetic structure. [...]
Q: (L) Oh, we have a new
asteroid, PM-9. Is PM-9 going
to hist us on May 10, 2003?
(A) Maybe.
A: Very possible.
Q: Is that our "Kaboom,
splat?"
A: Maybe.
 Q: If it hits in the Pacific,
Ranier will be a cladera,
tsunamis would roll into Puget
Sound, and goodbye to
Hawaii!
A: Yes.
Q: (A) If it will hit, we will
have nuclear radiation.
A: Yes.
Q: (L) What is the probability?
A: High.
Q: Will we move to France
before then?
A: Yes. [...]
Q: (L) Well, good night unless
there is something else you
want to say?
A: Progress is being made at
all levels, so carry on! Good
Night.

And so, in the final analysis, we come to

some idea that we are living in a time loop
in which many possibilities play out over
and over again according to some
archetypal pattern of the Theological
Reality. At the present moment, it seems
that the Atlantean drama is being
replayed. We can conjecture from
following the tracks that the two sides are
represented by the Pyramid people vs. the
Circle people at our level, though at some
level, these positions merge. That isn't
important to us here because that is out of
the scope of our potential function.

In any event, what seems to have

happened is that the Evil Empire of
Atlantis, headquartered in Antarctica, with
major outposts in South America, India,
Egypt, and other Southern locations, was
defeated by the "Athenians," or the
Northern contingent - the Hyperboreans.

However, shortly after this victory,

disaster struck, and it was a very long
time before the different groups
reassembled and were able to build the
pyramids and Stonehenge. In fact, several
catastrophes occurred between the final
collapse of the Atlantean Empire in 10,662
BC and the final major disaster on the
earth that occurred at the time of the
Exodus, and which included the eruption
of the volcano Thera on the island of
Santorini. At each of these periods, the
STS forces worked to consolidate their
position, little by little obliterating the
truth of the drama, except that it was
transmitted to us by a true initiate: Plato.
And we have Fulcanelli telling us to study
the classical Greek authors, the Greek
myths, for keys to our reality. He
compares them to the stories in the Bible,
and we certainly notice the similarity of
the story of David to the story of Perseus.
We then wonder if the stories of the
ancient world were so widely known that
they were co-opted to the use of the
Egyptian religion - corrupted and distorted
and "historicized?"

On the other hand, we have people like

Schwaller de Lubicz, trashing Fulcanelli,
trying to defame him and bastardize his
work, all the while promoting the agenda
of the "Egyptian Gods," in order to open
the Stargates to the reality of the Evil
Empire of Atlantis - Global takeover and
domination.

Plato also gave us the allegory of the cave

to explain the 4th density,
hyperdimensional reality, and discussed at
length the ways of accessing this so as to
serve others. He wrote:

This entire allegory, I said,

you may now append, dear
Glaucon, to the previous
argument; the prison-house is
the world of sight, the light of
the fire is the sun, and you
will not misapprehend me if
you interpret the journey
upwards to be the ascent of
the soul into the intellectual
world according to my poor
belief, which, at your desire, I
have expressed whether
rightly or wrongly God knows.

But, whether true or false, my

opinion is that in the world of
knowledge the idea of good
appears last of all, and is seen
only with an effort; and, when
seen, is also inferred to be the
universal author of all things
beautiful and right, parent of
light and of the lord of light in
this visible world, and the
immediate source of reason
and truth in the intellectual;
and that this is the power
upon which he who would act
rationally, either in public or
private life must have his eye
fixed.

I agree, he said, as far as I

am able to understand you.

Moreover, I said, you must

not wonder that those who
attain to this beatific vision
are unwilling to descend to
human affairs; for their souls
are ever hastening into the
upper world where they desire
to dwell; which desire of
theirs is very natural, if our
allegory may be trusted.

Yes, very natural.

And is there anything

surprising in one who passes
from divine contemplations to
the evil state of man,
misbehaving himself in a
ridiculous manner; if, while
his eyes are blinking and
before he has become
accustomed to the
surrounding darkness, he is
compelled to fight in courts of
law, or in other places, about
 the images or the shadows of
images of justice, and is
endeavoring to meet the
conceptions of those who
have never yet seen absolute
justice?

Anything but surprising, he

replied. [...]

And now shall we consider in

what way such guardians will
be produced, and how they
are to be brought from
darkness to light, -as some
are said to have ascended
from the world below to the
gods? [...] The process, I
said, is not the turning over of
an oyster-shell, but the
turning round of a soul
passing from a day which is
little better than night to the
true day of being, that is, the
ascent from below, which we
affirm to be true philosophy.

As the Cassiopaeans say: Strive always to

rise.
Schwaller de Lubicz and the
Fourth Reich

Laura Knight-Jadczyk

Our
physical
bodies
are
subject to
natural
3rd
density
causality
because
we are
part of
the 3rd
density
world and
subject to
its laws.
Our actions, based on 3rd density
interpretations alone, are then subject
to the same empirical 3rd density
causality, and because causal series
are continuous in time (each event has
a prior cause which is an effect of
another prior cause), we have no
freedom at this level of phenomena.
The totality of the 4th density field of
possibilities is veiled from us and
leaves us with no more freedom than
the causally simple stimulus-response
theories of the behaviorists. Our
actions are a result of causal
processes, controlled and devised at
the 4th density or Noumenal level of
reality, and freedom at this 3rd density
level is impossible unless we access
the 4th density causal level by SEEING
via the clues apparent in 3rd density.
If we can SEE the true field of options,
we can choose our ALIGNMENT.
THAT'S IT! But, alignment choices
seem to have far-reaching effects in
terms of 3rd density empirical
experience.

What this means is that, as long as we

do not engage in disciplined efforts to
widen our perception into ethereal
realms, we appear to have little
freedom within the field to behave
other than we do. The more aware of
the Noumenal/causal realm, the more
free will we can have. And this is
because we are overcoming the
damping effect of matter and the
predator's mind. By doing this, we are
increasing our polarization to STO.

Schwaller and others have focused

attention on the natural world,
teaching that assimilation to, and
activation of, the "neters" or principles
of natural, physically manifested life, is
the way to higher existence. This is
predicated on the "feeding nature" of
the natural world - the only one we
know (according to Schwaller), and he
proposes that doing this leads to a
"higher reality" where feeding - prey
and predation - are continuing
constructs. For the Organic Portal,
this may be entirely true and
appropriate.

However, in the realms of

consciousness, what is NOT materially
oriented can only be "seated" via the
mind, interfaced with the body via the
brain - the very thing that Schwaller
says must be used to "turn back" on
consciousness - self-reflection and re-
immersion into the physical realm.

We have brains that make us different

from the animals, not to use them to
figure out ways to become more
animal, as Schwaller proposes, even if
we are charged with learning from the
natural world about spiritual principles,
but so that we can use them to rise
into realms of pure thought where we
are no longer inhibited by the
"emotions" of the body which are the
"intelligence of the heart" as Schwaller
defines it. Only in the realms of pure
thought, consciousness, can we access
purely abstract ideas such as what can
be, what might have been, or what
should be. These are ideas that can be
dealt with via reason even if there are
no apparent manifestations of them in
our reality. And this is where
disciplined effort to envision what has
not (apparently) existed and does not
(apparently) exist, but which MUST
exist by virtue of the fact we can
conceive it comes into play.

We are being challenged to conceive of

a world where such "natural"
interactions do not exist, where
consumption and absorption are not
the rule, are not the norm. We are
being challenged to conceive of a world
that is not represented in our purely
service to self reality - a world where
honest asking and honest giving from
a position of pure free will is the
norm.

But Schwaller and his followers -

Maynerd Most AKA Dr. Strange, and
Alvin Wiley and others - say we must
increase the frequency resonance
vibration of this STS world. Most has
written:

"Before our trip to Egypt,

Darlene and I had both
studied and prepared
ourselves to do serious
magick in the temples.
We were on a quest, a
serious attempt to
create a Zodiacal Earth
Temple back in North
Carolina that required
us to charge crystals
and do other magickal
procedures.
Unfortunately, we were
also in a large group of
new age type spiritual
consumers.

"The group's leader chose

to be threatened by our
project, and we found
ourselves in the postion of
asking for divine guidance.
Should we go along with
the group vibe, or should
we move out on our own
and do the work? This was
extremely important to us.
We needed to know.

"At Edfu, where the

friction between the leader
and ourselves had boiled
over, we made contact
with a Sufi group. At
Luxor, we were met with
open arms by the local
Sufis. This helped us to
strike out on our own. At
Karnak we were led
through a series of
chambers and structures,
including a small Osiris
chapel out near the
eastern wall. We had no
idea or plan, we simply
followed their guidance
and charged our crystals
and did our work at the
places they showed us. I
knew of the Ptah temple
on the north wall and its
Sekhmet statue, and
planned to stop there for
guidance. I didn't know
that our guides had the
same idea. I insisted on
following the path shown
in the guide book, instead
of following the directions
of our guide, and so we
found them waiting for us.

"It was early in the

morning, we had been
there at dawn, and the
Sufi was waiting on us to
open the site for the day.
He unlocked the temple,
then closed the door
behind us. We groped
forward in the complete
blackness until we turned
a corner and saw the
statue floating in a shaft of
light coming from a small
hole about ten feet over
Her head. The Sufi showed
us how to make our
prostrations before the
Goddess, then left us
alone.

"We did the prostrations

and asked the Goddess
what to do about our
situation. As we finished, I
looked up directly at the
statue and was shocked to
see Her eyes. My first
thought was, 'Wow, what
an incredible use of
faience, I've never seen
anything like that!'

"As I looked more closely,

I saw that this could not
possibly be a trick of the
light on jewels or enamel.
These were eyes; the
irises were a deep green
like new foliage and the
pupil bent back at the top
like a fan. The Goddess
was there, in that
statue, and She was
looking at me. It was a
 shock. Except I couldn't
move. I was pinned like
a small animal in the
headlights of an
oncoming truck. We are
small, so very small,
and the Gods are vast,
vast beyond our
comprehension.

"We received our answer,

and as we finished our
little ritual, the Sufi came
back and showed us how
to make a direct contact
with the energy of the
statue. I found myself
clinging to the Goddess,
crying my heart out. A
very heavy initiatory
experience, indeed."

Those who believe that enhancing or

activating the "material world
intelligence of the heart" as promoted
by Schwaller, are merely diving BACK
into the soup. They are in no way
reaching for the pure consciousness of
higher awareness. They may think
that by aligning themselves with the
Egyptian neters, Sekhmet, and so on,
that they are achieving this "higher
state," but since those "resonance
fields" relate strictly to physical
existence, the only result will be to
strengthen the resonance of matter in
their reality. They will enhance the
ties to the 3rd density realm.

The C's say we must rise into realms of

consciousness to graduate to a world
that is completely different from the
one we know - and only in the realm of
the mind can it be conceived and born.

In the deepest terms, reason is more

than the domain of possibilities; it is
also the realm of possible empirical
worlds, of analytic constructions, of
alternate conceptions, and of potential
frameworks for the very conditions of
experience. Because we can think
about things that we have never
experienced with any of our senses,
we can understand that reason,
making use of knowledge and
awareness, can be independent of the
"real world."

Therefore, it is also possible that

Reason, supported by knowledge and
awareness, followed by choice, stands
in causal relation to phenomena.

In other words, if your knowledge and

awareness of the reality lead you to
the conclusion, via reason, that the
reality is controlled, and you are not
free within it, yet you can develop or
comprehend the idea of a world that is
NOT controlled, that is NOT limited,
you can CHOOSE to align yourself with
such a possible world in a deep and
conscious way. This choice of
alignment then becomes your
connection to a THOUGHT CENTER.
And the stronger your connection to
the Thought Center, which is in the
causal realm, the more it will manifest
in your reality.

Our reality is masked as a medium for

growth. And what we are growing is
our Will which, when aligned with a
given Thought Center, allows that
Thought Center to manifest its Will in
our reality to the extent we are in
alignment and can be amplified! To be
in alignment with the STO Thought
Centers results in an increase of
Spiritual consciousness and a
diminishment of the "sleeping"
consciousness of matter. To align with
the STS Thought Centers, as Schwaller
and others teach, results in an
increase of the "sleeping
consciousness," or "Wishful Thinking"
of matter, and a diminishment of
Spiritual Consciousness.
However, there is a kind of person who
has some sort of "inner inclination" for
Truth. They are simply unable to
accept anything else. They cannot be
satisfied until they have peeled the
onion to the very core. And these keep
their eyes on the goal of Truth.

The seeker of truth continues to gather

knowledge in the same way the
servants in the Parable of the Talents
continued to "invest" their money.
Gathering knowledge without prejudice
inevitably leads to humility. Humility
added to knowledge inevitably leads to
self-recognition. And self-recognition
becomes the companion that enables a
person to navigate the emotions and
illusions that seek to distract us and
blind us! Finally, self-recognition,
which is the ultimate state of Humility,
leads us to PURE WILL.

Now, notice, it didn't say STRONG will,

just pure. A person's "will to be" is his
natural frequency. And, when you
marry will to knowledge, you have
hope of using the will in a particular
way. This Will is the "mustard seed" of
the Biblical parable. Again: Will to Be,
or orientation, is your Frequency.

Application of will via knowledge, to

choices produces FREQUENCY
RESONANCE VIBRATION in the
consciousness which can then manifest
in the experience of the individual.

Frequency Resonance Vibration is

directly related to what is called Forced
Oscillation. Any wave system may be
driven by a force from the "outside."
Whenever a system is made to vibrate
by a periodic force, the resulting
motion is called Forced Oscillation. An
example would be the glass that
shatters when the opera singer hits the
"right note."
Forced Oscillations take place with the
frequency of the driving force rather
than with the natural frequency of the
system. The amplitude of the response
depends on how the driving frequency
is related to the natural frequency. If
these frequencies are nearly the same,
even a very weak driving force can, in
time, feed enough energy into the
system to give it a large amplitude of
motion. This condition is called
Resonance.

Everybody has probably pushed a child

on a swing. What you notice is, after a
series of very strong pushes to get the
swing going, you can stand there and
just give an occasional push or "tap" to
keep the same swinging motion going.
But, as every parent knows, it has to
be given at exactly the right instant.
The tap must be applied in the same
direction, and at the very instant of
the swinging away motion for it to
work. If you give a push at intervals
instead of at every return, you will find
that an increase of force is necessary
depending on how many times you let
the swing come and go before applying
another tap. If you set up a series of
"every other return" before pushing,
you will have to apply the exact same
force at each of these arbitrarily
determined intervals which will be a
multiple of the force you would have to
apply if you pushed with every single
return. These intervals of pushing at
arbitrarily designated returns are
submultiples of the natural frequency.
And, as you see from this example,
they can produce the same resonance
also, the Frequency Resonance
Vibration being the swinging in
response to being pushed.

If the pushes are continued, and if the

swing had long enough ropes and a
brave enough child, a regular series of
pushes could eventually launch the
child into outer space!

But, you will notice that if the pushes

are not given at the right moment, if
they are not constantly delivered
either with every swing or in a
submultiple, if no periodicity is
maintained, the swing will slow down
and stop. You will also notice that if
you do not apply the pushes in a fixed
period, the motion of the swing is
erratic. And you will definitely notice
that if you push at the wrong moment,
or against the swing direction, you will
cause it to slow down! In such a case,
you are taking energy away from the
system.

The very same principles apply to

Forced Oscillation of any wave whether
it is a sound wave, radio wave, light
wave or whatever. In fact, it could be
said that light is produced is Forced
Oscillations of atoms. All things in
nature which are a "response to a
stimulus" are Forced Oscillations.

The consciousness of a human being

could be considered to be a series of
Forced Oscillations either from his own
will and consciousness, or from the will
and consciousness of others.

And here we come to the problem:

Besides depending on how

close the driving frequency
is to the natural
frequency, the amplitude
of response of the forced
vibrations of a system also
depends on the strength of
the damping. The less
damping there is, the
greater the response of
resonance. The resonance
frequency is always lower
than the natural frequency
but gets very close as the
 damping is reduced.
[Freeman, Physics
Principles and Insights,
1973]

Now, as we have said, a human being

is a combination of frequencies of the
cellular structure, the etheric/genetic
body, and the consciousness
orientation. If these different
frequencies operate in harmonious
submultiples of a certain fundamental
frequency, we say that the system is in
harmony, that is to say, there is
Harmonious Frequency Resonance.

We can also say that, by changing one

of the frequencies and amplifying it,
the others may be brought into
harmony by the process of Forced
oscillation IF the natural frequency of
each is a harmonic of, or is close to,
the driving frequency.

At the same time, the act of changing

ANY of the frequencies can be
accomplished by Forced Oscillation
from the "outside," whether for
harmony or not. That is to say, if the
forced oscillation is not close to the
natural frequency, there will be less
amplitude.

Now, a human being, in general, is

under the powerful influence of the
matter of which his body is
constructed. Matter is the result of the
STS "Thought of Non-being," or
"Sleeping Consciousness" of God.
Therefore, in a general sense, by being
in 3rd density, to a great extenct, man
is "asleep;" he is under the influence of
the frequency of the STS polarity. His
Frequency Resonance Vibration is STS,
or that of matter/contraction - the
predator's mind.

But, man has a possibility of

CHANGING FREQUENCY, aligning with
STO polarity, IF he can find that part
of himself that is truly of Service to
Others and AMPLIFY it through the
process of Frequency Resonance
Vibration, resulting from the Forced
Oscillation of making choices of
alignment with the STO thought
center. It is only his Will that can do
this, and it is only WHEN it is "married
to knowledge" so that he can truly
KNOW what his choice is and how to
implement it. These choices are the
"pushes" of the swing. If sufficient
amplitude is achieved, ALL of his other
frequencies will also gradually move
into Frequency Resonance Vibration.

Of course, this process is not only

dependent upon the natural frequency
of the individual, but also upon the
dampers that may be in place that can
restrict the amplitude. The fewer
dampers, the greater the amplitude
that can be achieved with the least
application of energy.

We have to discover and remove the

"dampers" to our systems.

Again, it is in the gaining of knowledge

that we can remove the dampers, little
by little. It is hard work and it is
painful. But as we do this, we come,
step by step, to the position of humility
and self-knowledge that enables the
alignment of the will. If the natural
frequency of STO is present in the
moment of choice, this pure will
"becomes the friend of the highest of
knowledge" and they "enter into a
bond of eternal union." And one is then
able to connect with the Eternal
Creative Light within, which then
becomes the Forced Oscillator that
changes the Frequency Resonance
Vibration in dramatic and life changing
ways. This amounts to giving up self-
will to allow the greater will of the
Thought Center to manifest. The
manifestation of this in one's daily life
via choices become "pushes" of the
swing of the etheric/genetic body and
the atomic signature of the cellular
structure which then changes the
entire reality.

When we finally achieve Self-

recognition/humility, we understand
that it is implementation of our choices
at THIS 3rd density level that
increases the amplitude of our
Frequency Resonance Vibration, which
IS, in actuality, our polarization.
Amplitude constitutes our "ripeness"
for advancement to the next density.
What we are choosing is, in effect,
which part we will play in the NEXT
cycle of creation! What we do now
determines our course into either
consciousness that creates, or the
intensely contractile Thought of
Nonbeing that "goes to sleep" as
primal matter. Neither of them are
"higher" frequencies, they are
DIFFERENT.

Mass and "Spring Constant" are the

determinants of Frequency in material
terms. Using the principle of "As
above, so below," we must assume
that similar constructs apply to
"spiritual frequencies." The Spring
Constant is the measure of the force
needed to extend the mass by an
arbitrary measure. Mass, since it
relates to matter, in spiritual terms is
analogous to "sleeping consciousness"
or IGNORANCE. This means that the
fundamental "ignorant" or "sleeping"
nature of the STS orientation equates
to greater mass AND Spring Constant.
Greater mass and Spring Constant
require greater strength of Forced
Oscillation to produce Frequency
Resonance Vibration even if the
Natural Frequency is very close to the
frequency of the Forced Oscillator.
Thus, since the "Natural Frequency" of
the human being is that of matter to
the greatest extent, it is more inclined
to be influenced by the STS polarity
Forced Oscillation.

Less mass and Spring Constant are the

result of knowledge. Knowledge is a
function of consciousness, and all
knowledge that IS knowledge and not
assumption, prejudice or illusion,
increases consciousness.

Q: (L) We have been

discussing memories and
how memories of, say,
past lives are stored, and
that leads to the question
of what is the structure
and composition of the
soul? How does the soul
remember? How does it
carry its memories from
lifetime to lifetime, from
body to body, whether
simultaneous or
sequential? How does the
soul "store" them?
A: Has to do with atomic
principles. These with
gravity present the
borderland for the material
and the nonmaterial.
Which theoretical atomic
particulates would you
think form the basis here?
Q: (L) How about
tachyons?
A: Maybe neutrons?
Neutrinos.
Q: (A) Neutrinos are funny
particles because they are
massless. But, some
people don't believe that
neutrinos exist. Do they
exist?
A: Okay, we are going to
throw caution to the
"winds," and say yes.
[Laughter.]
Q: (L) In terms of these
neutrinos and soul
composition, how are
memories formed or held
or patterned with these
neutrinos?
A: Contained within for
release when and if
suitable.
Q: (L) Memories are
contained within the
neutrinos?
A: Sort of.
Q: (L) Are they contained
within patterns formed by
the neutrinos?
A: Closer.
Q: (L) So, that means that
if one "consciousness
unit," or soul, has more
memories or experiences
than another
consciousness unit, it
would have more
neutrinos?
A: No.
Q: (L) What's the
difference?
A: More data per unit, sort
of.
Q: (L) Does that mean
that an individual neutrino
can be, in and of itself,
more "dense" in data, so
to speak?
A: So to speak.
Q: (L) Does this increased
density of data change the
nature or function of the
individual neutrino?
A: Maybe it changes the
function of the awareness,
thus the environs.
Q: (L) Is there a specific
number of neutrinos that
constitutes a
consciousness unit, or
soul?
A: Number is not quite the
right concept. Orientation
is closer.
Q: (L) What are the
orientational options?
 A: Vibrational frequencies.
Q: (L) Do the vibrational
frequencies increase or
decrease with density of
data?
A: Change; better not to
quantify.

Note that the nature of the soul is

fundamentally changed by changing
the ORIENTATION of the basic units
and orientation has to do with
CHANGING frequencies. And the
process of changing orientation or
frequency is dependent on increasing
the data within the basic units; making
them more "dense." Vibrational
Frequencies change with increase of
density of data.

Increase of data changes the

frequency in a natural way from the
orientation of STS to that which is
closer to STO which results in a
reduction in Mass and Spring Constant
which means that less energy must be
input from the Forced Oscillator in
order to produce Frequency Resonance
Vibration!

This is why it is "easier" to increase

amplitude via the STO alignment. This
is why it is "easier" to graduate to 4th
density via the STO alignment. This is
also WHY all the dampers and controls
are held so tightly in place. The STS
gang do not WANT humans to
graduate to 4th density and that is
why they create beliefs and illusions
and controls that are designed to
induce us to make STS choices no
matter what we do. As long as we
believe lies, we are aligned with STS.
As long as we are aligned with STS,
our Mass and Spring Constant make it
impossible for us to increase our
amplitude for graduation.

And this points up another fact. In

order to graduate to 4th density via
the STS pathway, several conditions
must be met. First, nearly ALL of the
dampers to STS, or STO inclinations of
the individual, must be removed to
increase the potential for amplification.
Second, the natural frequency of the
individual, which we already know is a
function of choice, must be so close to
the pure STS frequency as to be
almost identical in order for the Forced
Oscillation from the higher density
Thought Center to have any effect at
all. This means that the degree and
depth of depravity, malignity,
malevolence, degeneration and
contraction must be VERY pure in the
individual.

When you "grok" the level of STS that

has to be present in an individual in
order to GRADUATE to 4th density
STS, the "purity" of the evil - the
consciousness of it - well, it is a pretty
horrifying thought. It's like Ted Bundy,
Albert Fish, Ed Gein, and Jeffrey
Dahmer all rolled into one and
amplified exponentially! Not only that,
SMARTER! Such beings would not have
the damping effect of any STO
frequencies on the STS frequency;
efforts would be made to reduce, or
eliminate entirely, any residual STO
inclinations which might act to
"expose" them in their moments of
STO "weakness." That is TRULY scary.
Something we need to keep in mind.
Such a being would be able to ACT in
any way they chose, without glitches
that "give them away," to disarm and
deceive in order to get their prey
where they want them.

Unfortunately, a mixture of STS and

STO choices do NOT add up to
graduation to 4th density STS. All they
do is damp each other, thus making it
less likely that any amplification will
occur. The person who wishes to
pursue the STS pathway with the
intent of "graduating" has to give up
any and all thoughts of experiencing
love or kindness that is freely given.
Yes, they can be in "love" relationships
and can "act" kind. But, at this level, it
is all PURE manipulation for the
purpose of "owning" or subsuming to
the self the energies of others. Yet,
there ARE those to whom this path is
attractive.

However, this is not clearly seen at the

lower densities until the masks are
stripped away. The deepest
implications of this are hidden by many
veils. And even the 4th and 5th density
STS participants do not necessarily
comprehend the ultimate dissolution at
the end of their philosophies which is
why there are so many sources at
higher levels that are convinced that
they are teaching Love and Light and
Truth and Beauty, and why so many
on 3rd density are deceived by these
teachings. They believe because it
"feels good," or because they "want
to." And this belief that is sustained in
the face of all empirical evidence to the
contrary amounts to "Wishful
Thinking." It is seeing what one
WANTS to see, rather than what IS.
Ultimate Wishful Thinking.

Of course, that means we have some

details to hammer out here. Like the
fact that, every single day we make
choices and every one of these choices
either amplifies our Frequency
Resonance Vibration, or damps it. The
Lizzies want to damp all our choices so
that we will neither be able to polarize
NOR increase amplitude. They have a
nice little thing going here and they
will do anything to keep it going.

One of the problems we face is the fact

that, very often the desire of human
beings at this 3rd level of density to
experience Light and Love and Truth
and Beauty, to be One, in a harmony
of similar goals and objectives of peace
and tranquillity, kindness, devotion,
respect and concord, is manipulated by
those beings who live in fear of losing
self, twisted and distorted to mean a
contraction into sameness rather than
harmonious variety.

In human terms, this "fear of losing

self" and need to "become One" is not
always expressed by overt domination,
subjugation. It is often expressed by
the dynamic of absorption of other
consciousness into a single ideal,
narrowly defined by human terms of
"love and light." Very often the ideals
of Love and Light are twisted to mean
the DENYING the Free Will of others to
make their own choices.

In fact, the idea that "evil/darkness" is

a rebellion, a fault, a thing to be done
away with, is the "twist" in all the
teachings of history that have laid the
groundwork for domination and
absorption by the forces of Service to
Self. In terms of monotheism, this idea
of "saving the world" has manifested
the fruits of the many slaughters that
have been instituted in the name of
Unity, and Love. Because of this
perceived need to "fix" or "change" or
"transform" other people or situations,
those whose inner inclination is
actually STO are induced to damp their
own STO frequency. If, in the act of
giving or sending love, or any act
whatsoever you deny the Free Will of
another, you are "damping" your STO
FRV. And remember, we are not
talking about Free Will in the simplistic
terms of being able to "do as one
chooses" without restriction." So we
aren't talking about not putting
criminals in jail for breaking the law! In
fact, putting a criminal in jail so that
he can fully enter into his freely
chosen lesson can be PURE STO! It's
the old "don't do the crime if you can't
do the time" cliche. By doing the
crime, the individual has CHOSEN the
consequences at some level.

Each and every time we participate in

Wishful Thinking, we are polarizing to
Service to Self because wishful
thinking is the essence of the
constructed defense against the fear of
Non being. Thus, when we live in
illusions, we are, by default, electing to
be part of the STS hierarchical Food
Chain. The illusions in which we
participate are generally projections of
higher density Service to Self beings,
and are set up to produce the negative
polarization energy of those on 3rd
density which supports and maintains
the 4th density STS beings so that
they can continue to project the
illusion! This results in the inability of
human beings to see what is truely of
STO, which prevents their making STO
choices, which damps their FRV, and
keeps them in the cycle.

The work of developing Free Will is to

stop believing lies. At the same time,
the only way to really learn this is to
"try on" the lies until the external
evidence mounts so high that one is
forced to the ultimate choice of
Choosing to continue in the lie in the
face of the evidence that it is a lie, or
to choose to see only the truth.

Such a choice is a "Causal act" of

polarization. It is an alignment of
choice.

"Making the choice" only comes to

those who are ready, those who have
reached that point on the "learning
cycle." None of us can skip this step,
and none of us can make it for others.
And, in fact, the greatest gift we can
give to "save" another is to RELEASE
them fully into their chosen creations/
lessons.
The deepest realization of this choice
"hits home" when you understand that
the greatest illusions that are chosen
by us are those of our closest
relationships. Jesus said:

"Do not think that I have

come to bring peace upon
the earth; I have not come
to bring peace but a
sword." For I have come
to part asunder a man
from his father, and a
daughter from her mother,
and a newly married wife
from her mother-in-law;
and a man's foes will be
they of his own household.
He who loves and takes
more pleasure in father or
mother than in Me is not
worthy of Me; and he who
loves and takes more
pleasure in son or
daughter than in Me is not
worthy of me; And he who
does not take up his cross
and follow Me is not
worthy of Me. Whoever
finds his [lower] life will
lose the [higher] life and
whoever loses his [lower]
life on My account will find
[the higher life]. [Matt.
10: 35-39, Amplified,
Zondervan]

Every situation or dynamic in which we

find ourselves demands a RESPONSE.
To not respond is, of course, a choice
to accede to the dynamic as IT is. This
means that the only true response we
can give is to BE more fully and
strongly what we have chosen.
Consciously. And only by doing this do
we progress to the next level.

And it is in this matter of choosing

orientation and amplification that the
terms of Service to Others and Service
to Self become the most important
ideas presented to humans in the
present time.

In practical terms, how do we "grow

stronger" in our polarity? If it is to be
of the Service to Others alignment,
isn't it just necessary to give? Isn't
that the only key? And don't the
Service to Self polarized beings just
take?

From one perspective, it would seem

that the most accepting and loving
thing to do would be to love ALL - to
surround all those of the Service to
Self alignment with Love and Light so
that they would be enclosed and
permeated with this love which would
then transform them to the Service to
Others alignment.

But note immediately that, in these

terms, the sendingof love is intended
to CHANGE, to TRANSFORM, to DENY
FREE WILL. And thus, by simply doing
this, one is aligning with the very
Orientation that seeks to deny Free
Will, i.e. STS. The result is that the
very love energy being sent IS Service
to Self Forced Oscillation!

And what will it then do? It will

AMPLIFY the STS frequency in the
person or situation it is being sent to
transform. It will do the opposite of
what is wanted, but exactly what is
INTENDED.

Service to Self seeks to dominate and

take all to stuff in its black hole of fear.
To send love (or to give anything) with
the intention of changing, transforming
or to make anything different than
what it is, is to seek DOMINATION.

For the Service to Others polarity to

allow itself to be manipulated by
deceptive teachings of "sending love
and light to transform the world,"
amounts to the ipso facto acceptance
of dominance. The damping of its own
frequency; the loss of amplitude.

Service to Others seeks to give ALL of

self to others. But, because the chief
thing it wishes to give is Free Will, it
only gives when ASKED.

Sounds like a marriage made in

Heaven, yes? One side wants to take,
one side wants to give. Go for it, right?

The idea that those of the STO

frequency must not give without being
asked is a subtle thing. The concept
inherent in "asking" is that of willing
exchange. The asking is the giving of
the asker. The response is the giving
of the askee. If there is anything in
either of them that expects any change
OTHER than the explicit asking and
giving, the interaction falls into STS
and not STO.

However, if one can ask, and one can

give without expectation of any change
of any kind in the receiver, the STO
dynamic is operational.

If there is even a hidden motive that

anything will be changed by the
exchange, the result is damping of the
STO frequency.

When you give in response to

manipulation, which is a domination
dynamic, you are also giving from a
position of STS, which is further Self-
damping to STO orientation and
amplifying to STS. And then, on top of
self damping, you are losing energy,
because there is no willing exchange!

The end result of giving Love energy to

the STS polarity is to gradually deplete
the STO polarity in the self as well as
in the grander scheme of things, and
eventually, to deprive all those of that
polarity from shared, symbiotic
sustenance. One has then, by default,
become part of the STS hierarchy and
has lost any usefulness in terms of
Service to Others. And if you are
seeking to polarize in the STO mode,
you must gain energy by alignment
and amplification to move OUT of the
STS realm into an STO dynamic where
all give to each other and there is
multiplication of force in the act, rather
than depletion.

The STS side wants to manipulate

enslavement. The STO side must
refuse in order to retain their strength
and purity and ability to actualize Free
Will for ALL.

The essence of Creation is the fact

that, beneath the empirical, observable
"real world" is the realm of potentials
and our physical world is manifested
out of the underlying potentialities by
our perspective. The "gift of Free Will"
of the Creator is our ability to CHOOSE
our perspective. We can choose "living
water" that becomes "a spring of water
welling up continually within," to
"eternal life/creation," or we can
choose the water from the "well of
Jacob the supplanter," which will leave
us thirsty again and again. And it is in
this choice that we come to the remark
of Don Juan "... As awareness reaches
levels higher than the toes,
tremendous maneuvers of perception
become a matter of course."

The problem is, in the beginning, when

we begin to use discipline to try to
"see the unseen," we are like a blind
man stumbling through a maze. We
are Theseus in the lair of the Minotaur,
guided only by the thread of Ariadne.
Our ability to perceive the Noumenal
world, the activities of 4th density,
requires great attention, great
discipline, and an ability to "face with
serenity odds that are not included in
our expectations." We have to learn
the art of "facing infinity without
flinching." And it is this process that
the Cassiopaeans are facilitating. What
they tell us about the Noumenal world,
the 4th density realm, is not supposed
to terrify us in the end, it is supposed
to wake us up to the odds that are
facing us that are NOT according to
our expectations.

And, as we begin to learn to really

SEE, we begin to make some
experimental choices based on what
we are seeing. Some of them work,
some of them don't. We adjust our
course gradually, learning what
amplifies our polarity and what damps
our polarity.

Every choice that supports Free Will for

any being, whether that being is using
their Free Will to choose to deny free
will to either themselves or others, to
the extent Free Will is maintained for
all involved, is a choice FOR Free Will
at the deepest levels of existence. But
notice the key: to support Free Will of
others to choose and fully experience
their own path - and that does NOT
mean to support the choice they have
made by participating in their lesson!
To participate in the choice of
orientation of another is to make it
your own. It can then act as a damper
to your own amplification.

This means that the ability to support

Free Will in others which lies in the
STO pathway MUST remain pure and
must NOT be subsumed into the STS
alignment or Free Will for all could
cease to exist in our present reality
which would create an imbalance of
such awesome proportions that I
shudder to consider the consequences.
In fact, it could even be said that
learning the true dynamics of Service
to Others and Free Will in the cadres of
those who have the internal
inclination, and to begin to practice it,
might considerably ameliorate any
predicted cataclysms. One thing that is
certain, however, to continue to violate
Free Will by all the "Love and Light"
efforts to change the world, to
"transform the darkness into light" will
result in nothing but worsening
conditions on our planet by the very
fact that they amplify the STS polarity.

In the broadest sense, the human

being who has mastery over his own
life, is a Shaman. And those of you
who resist this process most
strenuously are most likely the ones
with the greatest Shamanic capacity.
Will is will. It just needs to be married
to knowledge.

It has been observed that the desire of

the human being to enter into ecstatic
contact with the Divine is in direct
conflict with the fear of being obliged
to renounce the simple human
condition. We can see, from our
discussion above, that this is,
essentially, the conflict between
Service to Others and Service to Self.
The work to gather the knowledge and
become humble and face the deep
inner truth about the self is the price,
and not everyone is able to pay it. And
this is the human dilemma. There is
nothing more cozy than to be a human
being. We can live forever behind veils
of illusion, suffering our blindness, and
dying in our ignorance; and, until
some aspect of that human has had its
fill of suffering and death, there will be
no desire to venture into the unknown
to seek the cure for the human
disease. Only the soul that is ready for
this definitive journey is willing to risk
the soul chilling fear of traveling into
the enchanted forest of the Cosmos, in
order to experience the unspeakable
joy of finding the Grail - the choice for
Free Will Service to Others that serves
ALL.

A Shaman is, as Eliade describes, a

Technician of Ecstasy. This is an
essential qualification and/or result of
contact with the Divine. More than
that, in order to be in direct contact
with the Divine, the human being must
be able to "see the unseen." This
Seeing is the capacity of human beings
to enlarge their perceptual field until
they are capable of assessing not only
outer appearances, but also the
essence of everything in order to
access the level of being that enables
them make choices that are capable of
initiating a new causal series.

Of course, problems arise when an

individual attempts to be a Shaman
without knowledge. A recent
correspondent sent us some
information about a popular channeled
source that claims to be teaching a
new perspective on physics.

Dear Ark and Laura,

I don't know much about
Scalar Waves, certainly
not enough to know
whether or not the site
below's information on
Scalar Waves is useful, but
I pass the information
along to you. I have heard
Anna Hayes speak on the
Jeff Rense radio show, and
she made a good
impression as an
apparently calm and
knowledgeable person.

Ark went to the site in question and

began to read. After a period of study,
he responded as follows:

Hi ____,
While reading:
"Dimensions are
interwoven layers of scalar
waves that serve to direct
the flow of consciousness/
energy into multiple
patterns of refraction
through which the
hologram of matter
density, linear time and
manifest objectification of
reality can be experienced.
Dimensions exist in
precise relationship to
each other creating a 90-
degree difference in
Angular Rotation of
Particle Spin between
dimensional bands. Scalar
Waves are points of
Standing Waves,
composed of quantities of
consciousness, that
emanate out of fixed
points of vibration which
form ultra-micro-particle
units called Partiki, Partika
and Particum. Scalar
Waves exist within a fixed
Scalar Field that forms the
Universal Unified Field of
consciousness/energy.
Fixed scalar waves appear
to move due to a
perpetual action of internal
fission and fusion, through
which series of scalar
standing wave points 'flash
on and off' creating
perpetual rhythms of
motion called 'flash-line
sequences' through which
continual manifestation
and de-manifestation of
matter occurs."

I can't help thinking that it

is a pity that a person that
evidently knows nothing
about waves, dimensions,
 particle spin etc. chooses
to "TEACH" others on
these subjects. But, on the
other hand, creating more
confusion is what the
Lizzies must have on their
mind. And they seem to be
successful. On the other
hand, we are in a Free Will
Universe - it is up to each
person to choose the path
and the "teacher." Thanks
for the link - it helps me.
Best,
ark.

As it happened, the response was also

sent to a promoter of the above
channeling who then responded:

Hi:
One doesn't need to know
anything on a specific
topic when the information
isn't coming from oneself
but from a higher source.
Love, Light, and Joy

Aside from the fact that actually

reading that nonsense is an energy
drain, such a perspective does NOT
resonate with the Cassiopaean
information in which independent
study and gaining of knowledge is
urged as the only means by which we
can be protected from being led into
"traps." Ark replied:

Sure, but to check

whether the information
comes from a higher
source or lower source, it
is always necessary first to
check whether the
information makes any
sense or is just a mumbo-
jumbo. There are lot of
dead dudes and other
entities that are more than
 ready to pour all kinds of
nonsense into our heads.
Real research is ALWAYS
necessary. How else can
we know we are not being
disinformed? You must
never RELY on what the
entities tell you. You
always have to check and
keep critical! Unless you
WANT to live in an illusion.
Many people do.
Best,
ark

Anyone can be a channel. But it takes

knowledge and WILL to be able to
CHOOSE who or WHAT one will
channel.

One of the hardest things for anyone

to acknowledge is their own
susceptibility to suggestion,
manipulation and external control. No
one wants to admit that their
awareness can be manipulated. Yet,
without exception, all of the Mystery
Teachings tell us that the first order of
business in expanding awareness is to
overcome the hypnosis, or "sleep
state" in which man exists. And,
without exception, all of the Mystery
Teachings tell us that this is so
formidable a task that only one in ten
thousand can achieve it!

Think about this for a moment. Nine

thousand, nine hundred ninety-nine
people will react to this statement by
thinking: "I am the one in ten
thousand!" The Great Masters will tell
you that if you think this, then you are
NOT!

It is the one who realizes that all of his

perceptions must be minutely
scrutinized, doubted, tested, examined
and challenged who has the smallest
hope of escaping the hypnosis!! And,
to realize this is but the first in a long
series of steps to awakening. And,
remember, awakening is not the same
thing as seeing! Many can see in
expanded awareness, but immediately
go back to sleep and what they saw is
interpreted by the standards of the
"hypnotic sleep state" of ordinary
awareness. This is what happens to
most of those who claim to channel
with no need to "check their sources!"
And, as Ark wrote, "to check whether
the information comes from a higher
source or lower source, it is always
necessary first to check whether the
information makes any sense or is just
a mumbo-jumbo. ...Real research is
ALWAYS necessary. ... You must never
RELY on what the entities tell you. ...
Unless you WANT to live in an illusion."

And, from my perspective, the main

reason such "seers" do not doubt, test,
examine and challenge their so-called
"guides" is due purely and simply to
ego. They have been told that they are
"special" or "chosen" or are the
"messenger" of this or that "council" or
the "heavenly host" or whatever, and
it is far easier and more comfortable to
believe this, and the further instruction
that "all you need to do is listen to us!"
than to exert the enormous efforts
required to acknowledge, and extirpate
the ego's weaknesses, the chief one
being, of course, susceptibility to
manipulation by forces far more
devious than the human mind can
fathom.

Don Juan says that Seers must be

paragons of virtue by their will and
intent in order to override the nearly
invincible laxness of the human
condition and programming. To say
"One doesn't need to know anything
on a specific topic when the
information isn't coming from oneself
but from a higher source," is so
astonishing an example of this laxness
and manipulation that it is difficult to
understand how a person can write it
without being immediately assaulted
by the insanity of such a view!

One of the necessary

conditions of learning to
truly SEE is to be able to
bring the mind to focus on
anything with uncommon
force and clarity. Yet, what
is learned during these
periods of focus is usually
unavailable to normal
recall." [Castaneda, The
Fire From Within, 1984]]

Obviously, great polarized strength is

necessary here. SEEING is to witness
the unknown and to glimpse the
unknowable. The unknown is veiled
from man but is within the reach of
man's reason if he is sufficiently
polarized and amplified! The
unknowable is the indescribable, the
unthinkable, and the unrealizable. It is
something that may never be known
to us in our human estate, but seers
who are in the grip of laxness and
programming don't let THAT stop
them!

"...there have certainly

been attempts to imbue
the [ineffable unknown]
with attributes [it] does
not have. But that always
happens when
impressionable people
learn to perform acts that
require great sobriety.
Seers come in all sizes and
shapes. ...There are scores
of imbeciles who become
seers. Seers are human
beings full of foibles, or
rather, human beings full
of foibles are capable of
becoming seers. ...The
characteristic of miserable
 seers is that they are
willing to forget the
wonder of the world. They
become overwhelmed by
the fact that they see and
believe that it is their
genius that counts. A seer
must be a paragon in
order to override the
nearly invincible laxness of
our human condition. More
important than seeing
itself is what seers do with
what they
see." [Castaneda, The Fire
From Within, 1984]

Apparently the effort required to bring

this learning to normal consciousness
is staggering and impossible for most
people because they have no "vessel
of knowledge" prepared to receive it.
He further tells us, and this is
corroborated in other teachings, that
to interact with the unknown, but that
which is ultimately within the reach of
knowing through great work, is
energizing, exhilarating and fulfilling
even when it is also full of
apprehension and fear. It seems that
one of the effects of enlargement of
the perceptual field is a combination of
sheer joy combined with a frightening
feeling of sadness and longing. This is
apparently because a full field of
awareness includes all the opposites in
perfect balance.

But, even on the level of the unknown

that is ultimately accessible to human
perception, Seers who truly See often
go to pieces on finding out that
existence is incomprehensibly complex
and that our normal awareness
distorts all and perverts with its
limitations.

Don Juan remarked that:

 "In the life of warriors it
was extremely natural to
be sad for no overt
reason. ...Whenever the
boundaries of the known
are broken, a mere
glimpse of the eternity
outside is enough to
disrupt the coziness of our
controlled awareness. The
resulting melancholy is
sometimes so intense that
it can bring about death. ...
The best way to get rid of
melancholy is to make fun
of it." (Castaneda, 1984)

But, to interact with the unknowable is

to become drained or confused, open
to oppression and possession. The
bodies of such seers lose tone, their
reasoning becomes flawed, and their
sobriety wanders aimlessly.

The Cassiopaeans have said:

A: The bottom line is this:

You are occupying 3rd
density. You are by
nature, STS. You can be
an STO candidate, but you
are NOT STO until you are
on 4th density. You will
NEVER grasp the meaning
of these attempted
conceptualizations until
you are at 4th and above.

To make this point a little clearer, let

me add that, before the "Fall," human
beings were 3rd density STO, which
means that they were ALIGNED with
4th density STO. We have already
discussed what this reality must have
been like in terms of the megalith
builders who were able, by their
interaction with Celestial forces, to
manifest all that was needed without
assault on the environment of Earth.
Don Juan tells us that the Seers of
ancient times were "men capable of
inconceivable deeds. They were
powerful sorcerers, somber and driven,
who unraveled the secrets" of
existence at our level. They were able
to "influence and victimize people by
fixating their awareness on whatever
they chose." This is an important key
in terms of Frequency Resonance
Vibration that cannot be overstressed.

There are two positions in the study

and understanding of awareness:
Sorcerers vs. The Warrior Who Sees.
They Both practice the same Seeing,
the difference is Intent. The Sorcerer
practices to control others. The Warrior
practices to become Free.

The Cassiopaeans designate these two

positions as "Service to Others," and
"Service to Self." Those who wish to
control others are Serving Self, those
who wish to become free and help
others who wish to become free are
Serving Others.

Shaman is another way to describe the

Warrior who practices to be free. A
Shaman is not a magician or a sorcerer
although he CAN play those roles if he
chooses. He is not a healer, though he
can play that role also. A Shaman is
far more; he is a psychopomp, a
priest, a mystic and a poet.
Shamanism is NOT a religion, it is a
function, a role, a magico-religious
phenomenon specific to certain
individuals who have ecstatic capacity
permitting "magical flight" to higher
realms, descent into the underworld to
battle dark forces, mastery over fire,
matter, time and space. Unfortunately,
as Don Juan noted, in the present
time, the Shamanic acts are acts of
great laxity, distortion and aberration.

The word "shaman" comes to us

through Russian from the Tungusic
"saman." The word is derived from the
Pali samana, (Sanskrit sramana),
through the Chinese sha-men (a
transcription of the Pali word).

The word shaman, may be related to

Sarman. According to John G. Bennett,
Sarmoung or Sarman:

"The pronunciation is the

same for either spelling
and the word can be
assigned to old Persian. It
does, in fact, appear in
some of the Pahlawi
texts...The word can be
interpreted in three ways.
It is the word for bee,
which has always been a
symbol of those who
collect the precious 'honey'
of traditional wisdom and
preserve it for further
generations. A collection of
legends, well known in
Armenian and Syrian
circles with the title of The
Bees, was revised by Mar
Salamon, a Nestorian
Archimandrite in the
thirteenth century. The
Bees refers to a
mysterious power
transmitted from the time
of Zoroaster and made
manifest in the time of
Christ."

"Man" in Persian means

"the quality transmitted by
heredity and hence a
distinguished family or
race. It can be the
repository of an heirloom
or tradition. The word sar
means head, both literally
and in the sense of
principal or chief. The
combination sarman would
 thus mean the chief
repository of the
tradition..."

"And still another possible

meaning of the word
sarman is... literally, those
whose heads have been
purified." [John G.
Bennett, Gurdjieff: Making
of A New World]

Those whose heads have been

purified! What an interesting idea!
Especially when you consider the
concept of Frequency Resonance
Vibration and Orientation/Polarization.

We already suspect that these ideas

are far older than Zoroaster. And for
those who have supposed that the
concept of the shaman was stimulated
by Buddhism, I will point out that
other studies have shown that, even
before the intrusion of Buddhism into
Central Asia, there was the cult of
Buga, god of the sky, a celestial
worship that antedates Sun and Moon
worship.

The central theme of Shamanism is the

"ascent to the sky" and/or the
"descent" to the underworld. In the
former, the practitioner experiences
Ecstasy, in the latter, he battles
demons who threaten the well being of
humanity. There are studies that
suggest evidence of the earliest
practices are in the cave paintings of
Lascaux with the many representations
of the bird, the tutelary spirits, and the
ecstatic experience (ca, 25,000 B.C.).
Animal skulls and bones found in the
sites of the European Paleolithic period
(before 50,000 - ca. 30,000 B.C.) have
been interpreted as evidence of
Shamanic practice.

The "ecstatic experience" is the

primary phenomenon of Shamanism,
and it is this ecstasy that can be seen
as the act of merging with the celestial
beings. And merging results in Forced
Oscillation that changes Frequency.
Continued interaction with Celestial
beings is a form of Frequency
Resonance Vibration.

The idea that there was a time when

man was directly in contact with the
Celestial Beings is at the root of the
myths of the Golden Age which have
been redacted to the Grail stories of
the 11th and 12th centuries. During
this paradisal time, it is suggested that
communications between heaven and
earth were easy and accessible to
everyone. Myths tell us of a time when
the "gods withdrew" from mankind. As
a result of some "happening," i.e. "The
Fall," the communications were broken
off and the Celestial Beings withdrew
to the highest heavens.

This is exactly what the Cassiopaeans

have told us regarding our former
alignment with 4th density STO and
our present alignment with 4th density
STS, and which we have examined to
some extent in earlier sections of the
present work.

But, the myths also tell us that there

were still those certain people who
were able to "ascend" and commune
with the gods on the behalf of their
tribe or family. Through them, contact
was maintained with the "guiding
spirits" of the group. The beliefs and
practices of the present day shamans
are a survival of a profoundly modified
and even corrupted and degenerated
remnant of this archaic technology of
concrete communications between
heaven and earth.

And, again, the Cassiopaeans

suggested this perspective, which was
confirmed in later studies. But we will
come to that later.

The shaman, in his ability to achieve

the ecstatic state inaccessible to the
rest of mankind, was regarded as a
privileged being. More than this, the
myths tell us of the First Shamans who
were sent to earth by the Celestial
Beings to DEFEND human beings
against the "negative gods" who had
taken over the rule of mankind. It was
the task of the First Shamans to
activate, in their own bodies, a sort of
"transducer" of cosmic energy for the
benefit of their tribe. This was
expressed as the concept of the "world
tree," which became the "axis" or the
Pole of the World and later the "royal
bloodlines."

It does seem to be true that there is a

specific relationship between this
function and certain "bloodlines." But,
as with everything that has been
provided to help mankind, this concept
has been co-opted by the forces
seeking to keep mankind in darkness
and ignorance. The true and ancient
bloodlines of the First Shamans have
been obscured and hidden by the false
trail of the invented genealogies of the
Hebrew Old Testament supposedly
leading to certain branches of present
day European royal and/or noble
families, which seek to establish a
counterfeit "kingship" that has
garnered a great deal of attention in
recent times.

As we have already noted, BEFORE the

Fall, every human being had access to
communication with the higher
densities via the "Maidens of the
Wells," or the union between the right
and left hemispheres of the brain and
alignment with the 4th density STO.
Because of their alignment, their
frequency, and the lack of STS
dampers, it was a simple matter to
amplify Frequency Resonance
Vibration.

AFTER the Fall, it seems that a specific

genetic variation was somatically
induced by the incarnation of certain
higher density beings who "gave their
blood" for the "redemption of man."
That is to say that they changed the
body and DNA by Forced Oscillation. It
is likely that this was done through the
female incarnations because of the role
of the mitochondrial DNA, but I don't
want to get ahead of myself here, so
we will leave that for the moment.

Nevertheless, the presence of this

DNA, depending upon the terms of
recombination, makes it very likely
that there are literally millions of
carriers of this bloodline/Shamanic
ability on the earth today. And it is for
all of YOU that these pages are being
written.

In this present time, there are

indications that Cosmic changes of
monumental proportions are "in the
wind." There are also indications that a
particular "time element" is involved,
and all the forces of darkness seek to
deceive and obfuscate at levels never
before achieved in order to distract,
confuse, dilute and defuse the abilities
of those who may be the bearers of
the "circuits of change" for all
humanity.

The Sufis have kept the "Technician of

Ecstasy" concept alive in their tradition
of the "Poles of the World." The kutub
or q'tub (pole of his time) is an
appointed being, entirely spiritual of
nature, who acts as a divine agent of a
sphere at a certain period in time.
Each kutub has under him four awtads
(supports) and a number of abdals
(substitutes) , who aid him in his work
of preserving and maintaining the
world. The interesting thing about this
idea is that the individual who occupies
the position does not even have to be
aware of it! His life, his existence, even
his very physiology, is a function of
higher densities extruded into 3rd
density. That this has a very great deal
to do with "bloodlines," as
promulgated in recent times is true,
but not necessarily in the ways
suggested. Again, we will come to that
soon enough.

Q: (L) But isn't the nature

of a person determined by
their soul and not the
physical body?
A: Partially, remember,
aural profile and karmic
reference merges with
physical structure.
Q: (L) So you are saying
that particular genetic
conditions are a physical
reflection of a spiritual
orientation? That the soul
must match itself to the
genetics, even if only in
potential?
A: Yes, precisely.
Q: (L) So a person's
potential for spiritual
advancement or
unfoldment is, to a great
extent, dependent upon
their genes?
A: Natural process marries
with systematic construct
when present.
[Cassiopaeans]

In the present time, it seems that

those with the "bloodline" are
awakening. It is no longer feasible to
be a "Pole of the World" who is asleep,
because, as we will soon examine,
there are some very serious matters of
choice and action that may be
incumbent upon the awakened
Shaman. The first order of business
seems to be to awaken and
accumulate strength of polarity.

Shamans are born AND made. That is

to say, they are born to be made, but
the making is their choice. And, from
what I have been able to determine,
the choice may be one that is made at
a different level than the conscious,
3rd density linear experience. Those
who have made the choice at the
higher levels, and then have negated
the choice at this level because they
are not able to relinquish their ordinary
life, pay a very high price, indeed.

A shaman stands out because of

certain characteristics of "religious
crisis." They are different from other
people because of the intensity of their
religious experiences. In ancient times,
it was the task of the Shamanic elite to
be the "Specialist of the Soul," to
guard the soul of the tribe because
only he could "see the unseen" and
know the form and destiny of the
Group Soul. But, before he acquired
his ability, he was often an ordinary
citizen, or even the offspring of a
shaman with no seeming vocation
(considering that the ability is reputed
to be inherited, though not necessarily
represented in each generation.)

At some point in his life, however, the

shaman has an experience that
"separates" him from the rest of
humanity. This Native American "vision
quest" is a survival of the archaic
understanding of the natural initiation
of the shaman who is "called" to his
vocation by the gods. A deep study of
the matter reveals that those who seek
the magico-religious powers via the
vision quest when they have not been
"called" spontaneously, generally
become the "Dark Shamans," or
sorcerers; those who, through a
systematic study, obtain the powers
deliberately for their own advantage.
(Again, Don Juan's distinction between
the Sorcerer and the Warrior who
practices to be Free.)

The true Shamanic initiation comes by

dreams, ecstatic trances combined
with extensive study. A shaman is
expected to not only pass through
certain initiatory ordeals, but he/she
must also be deeply educated in order
to be able to fully evaluate the
experiences and challenges that he/
she will face. Unfortunately, until now,
there have been precious few who
have traveled the path of the Shaman,
including the practice of the attendant
skills of "battling demons," who could
teach or advise a course of study for
the Awakening Shaman.

The future shaman is traditionally

thought to exhibit certain exceptional
traits from childhood. He is often very
nervous and even sickly in some ways.
(In some cultures, epilepsy is
considered a "mark" of the shaman,
though this is a later corrupt
perception of the ecstatic state.) It has
been noted that shamans, as children,
are often morbidly sensitive, have
weak hearts, disordered digestion, and
are subject to vertigo. There are those
who would consider such symptoms to
be incipient mental illness, but the fact
is extensive studies have shown that
the so-called hallucinations or visions
consist of elements that follow a
particular model that is consistent from
culture to culture, from age to age,
and is composed of an amazingly rich
theoretical content. It could even be
said that persons who "go mad," are
"failed shamans" who have failed
either because of a flaw in the
transmission of the genetics, or
because of environmental factors. At
the same time, there are many more
myths of failed Shamanic heroes than
of successful ones, so the warnings of
what can happen have long been in
place. Mircea Eliade remarks that:

... The mentally ill patient

proves to be an
unsuccessful mystic or,
better, the caricature of a
mystic. His experience is
without religious content,
even if it appears to
resemble a religious
experience, just as an act
of autoeroticism arrives at
the same physiological
result as a sexual act
properly speaking (seminal
emission), yet at the same
time is but a caricature of
the latter because it is
without the concrete
presence of the partner.
[Eliade, Shamanism, 1964]

Well, that's a pretty interesting

analogy! It even suggests to us the
idea that one who attempts to activate
a Shamanic inheritance within the STS
framework of Wishful Thinking, has an
"illusory" partner as in the above
described activity, with similar results.
In other words, Sorcery is like
masturbation: the practitioner satisfies
himself, but his act does no one else
any good. And, by the same token, a
Shaman who operates without
knowledge is like the proverbial
premature ejaculation: he gets
everybody all excited, and then leaves
them hanging!

But, such amusing vulgarities aside

(even if they DO make the point
remarkably well) the thing about the
shaman is that he/she is not just a sick
person, he is a sick person who has
been CURED, or who has succeeded in
curing himself!! This point can't be
overemphasized! Those who aspire to
mysticism, to the Shamanic path, and
who still remain frail or sickly in
physical, material or spiritual terms,
may not yet have been presented with
the initiation, or, if they have, may
have failed to pass. The possibility of
achieving the Shamanic powers for
Service to Self also exists, so great
care has to be used in trying to "see
the unseen."

In many cases, the "election" of the

shaman manifests through a fairly
serious illness which can only be cured
by the "ascent to the sky." After the
ecstatic vision of initiation, the shaman
feels MUCH better! After the response
to the calling of the gods, the shaman
shows a more than normally healthy
constitution; they are able to achieve
immense concentration beyond the
capacity of ordinary man; they can
sustain exhausting efforts and, most
importantly, they are able to "keep a
cool head" in the face of experiences
that would break an ordinary person.

Another point that should be

emphasized is that the Shaman must
be able to be in full control of himself
even when in the ecstatic state!
(Trance channelling with no memory of
what transpired is NOT the activity of a
fully fledged Shaman!) This ability to
"walk in two worlds simultaneously"
demonstrates an extraordinary
nervous constitution. It has been said
that, the Siberian shamans show no
sign of mental disintegration well into
old age; their memories and powers of
self-control are WELL above average.

Don Juan calls this state being

"impeccable." This idea is also
reflected in the archaic systems of the
Yakut, where the shaman must be
"serious, possess tact, be able to
communicate effectively with all
people; above all, he must not be
presumptuous, proud, ill-tempered."
The true shaman emanates an inner
force that is conscious, yet never
offensive. At the same time, it should
be noted that a true shaman may
evoke very negative responses from
those who are under the domination of
the STS polarity.

Getting back to the infirmities, nervous

disorders, illness of crisis and so forth
that are the "signs of election," it is
also noted that, sometimes an
accident, a fall, a blow on the head, or
being hit by lightning are the signs
from the environment that the shaman
has been elected. But, being "called" is
not the same as being "chosen," or,
more precisely, choosing. "Many are
called; few choose to respond."

But, this choosing is a process. And it

is a process of struggle and pain and
suffering because, in the end, what is
being killed is the ego.

So, in the Cosmic scheme of things,

which is TRUE Love and Giving? To
support and sustain a person in illusion
with all the attendant "food" that is
implicit in the marriage relationship, to
continue to amplify their STS
frequency, or to RELEASE them to
lessons - the giving of what is truly
appropriate to their actions/asking -
that may eventually facilitate their own
growth and/or initiation, if not in this
life - in the next?

Of course, the question then becomes:

can you withdraw support from the
dynamic and still support the person?
The fact is, in terms of soul choices, it
is impossible to intimately support a
person who is aligned to a certain soul
choice without also supporting that
person's choices.

But, it is here that a very hard look

has to be taken at the self to inquire
WHY you would want to continue to
support and sustain a person who is
part of a dynamic that you have
chosen NOT to feed any longer?
(Again, I repeat that what I am saying
here is ONLY for those who have taken
the step toward full initiation!)

Are you staying in the relationship

because of financial considerations? Is
it "for the children?" Or because you
don't see how you could continue your
path of learning without the financial
backing of the marriage? If it is for
financial considerations relating to
yourself, it is easy to see that YOU are
the vampire. You are offering an
"illusion" of love and support in order
to obtain something that YOU want or
need. If you are staying for the sake of
the children, you need to be very
careful how you think this is going to
benefit them. In the first place, at
some soul level these children are
learning by observing and
experiencing. They observe and
experience a vampire dynamic and
they grow up to emulate it in their own
lives. Is that what you want for your
children? In another sense, if you are
in a relationship where there is
"feeding" going on, one or both of the
marriage partners is going to HAVE to
obtain energy from somewhere, and
the most likely sources are going to be
the children. Is THAT what you want?

The key is, can you stay in the

relationship without EXPECTATION of
ANYTHING being changed or made
better by your presence and/or
support?

The essential thing about the STO

Shamanic path is to give only when
ASKED. And then, to give ALL that is
asked. This pretty much excludes
giving to those of the STS orientation
because they NEVER ask! They
manipulate, they demand, they beg,
they even ask with their words but not
their actions. This issue of "asking" is a
thing you can only see by seeing the
unseen. Perhaps one way to think
about it would be that you can tell if
someone is really "asking" if there is
NO expectation on their part that you
will give to them what they are asking!
And, there is no condition placed upon
YOU as to whether or not you say yes
or no. In other words, if you say
"no," (because you cannot say yes for
whatever reason) you are certain that
there will be no break or decline in
your relations. And the same thing
applies to the self. If you "ask," are
you really asking? Or, is there some
string attached such as "if you love me
you will say yes," or "see what I have
done for you; now it's your turn,"
whether implied or not?

The essential thing to know is that

Service to Others is the path of
spiritual love, which is entirely distinct
from the love of the world and self-
love. The whole secret of True Magic
lies within the laws of the divine
proximity. As you grow closer to Love
as God the creator expresses it, you
grow closer to God. And God loves
everything exactly as it is. That is WHY
it IS!

The more a person becomes

assimilated to the Service to Others
orientation, the more effective his
choices become, but, at the same
time, to others his existence becomes
incomprehensible.

Now, it is pretty easy to practice these

terms when giving to strangers or
associates that are not intimately
involved in your life. It's a lot harder to
do it in close, personal relationships!
But that is where it is most essential
for the Shaman!

The reason for this is the particular

role the Shaman plays in the Cosmic
dynamics of all times, and most
especially the present - that of the
Spiritual Warrior.

...Shamanism is important
not only for the place that
it holds in the history of
mysticism. The shamans
have played an essential
role in the defense of the
psychic integrity of the
community. They are
preeminently the
antidemonic champions;
they combat not only
demons and disease, but
also the black magicians.
The exemplary figure of
the shaman champion is
the mythical founder of Na-
khi shamanism, the
tireless slayer of demons.
The military elements that
are of great importance in
certain types of Asian
shamanism are accounted
for by the requirements of
war against the demons,
the true enemies of
humanity. In a general
way, it can be said that
shamanism defends life,
health, fertility, the world
of "light," against death,
diseases, sterility,
disaster, and the world of
"darkness." [Eliade, 1964]

The fundamental and universal

function of the Shaman is to have the
force necessary for what we call the
struggle against "the powers of evil."
This does NOT mean going and duking
it out with a demon or arguing over
which channeled information is right or
wrong or praying for World Peace or
sending Love and Light to war-torn
Bosnia. It doesn't mean doing spirit
release or exorcism (though it could
include such things in certain
circumstances).

What it DOES mean is the constant

and ever present need to sustain a
very particular Frequency Resonance.
What the Shaman represents is a "Pole
of the World," through which the
energies of Creation can be transduced
into 3rd density. They are required to
manifest in their bodies certain
frequencies that can only be developed
in relationships where the life force of
the Shaman is ENHANCED by the
interaction, not drained.

And, the "battling of demons" is clearly

a clue that the STO Shaman must
amplify the STO frequency and avoid
amplification of the STS dynamic. That
is where the true battle is being fought.

In the stories of the ancient Shamans

of great power, it is often noted that, if
they become a Shaman at a point in
their life when they have a spouse and
family, very often the Shaman is given
a new "spirit spouse" whose most
important function is to prepare special
food for the Shaman so that he/she
can do the special work. Sometimes
this "spirit spouse" was an actual
"second wife" or husband, who moved
in with the family. In cultures where
Shamanism was understood, if the
original wife was not "suitable," she at
least understood the necessity for a
"special wife" to fulfill the function of
"feeding the shaman." Of course, there
are some stories of first wives who did
NOT take well to having a second wife,
even if it was only a spirit and not
embodied in another woman, and the
result was generally a conflict that
ended in the death of the first wife. (Or
husband if the shaman was a woman.)

The point of this is not that it tells us

something in a literal sense, but that it
is symbolic of the the Shaman's
spiritual need to interact with beings
that "feed" rather than drain. A
conclusion could be drawn that the
STO Shaman must be in direct
interaction, on an intimate level, only
with someone who is "alike." In such a
case their energies will exchange,
commutate, and expand from the
interaction. They will "push each
other's swing." They will set up a
Frequency Resonance Vibration
between them that is so powerful that
they will naturally "grow."

And, of course we know by now that

the forces of darkness will bring
forward many of their own candidates
for this intimate interaction who are
NOT alike for the purpose of making
sure that the Shaman never gains
sufficient strength. At the same time,
the presence of the such persons in
the Shaman's life CAN serve the all-
important function of assisting in the
"breaking down" and stripping of the
flesh from the bones in preparation for
the initiation. But, once the initiation
has occurred, it is CRUCIAL for the
Shaman to ACT in order to
immediately strengthen his polarity. It
is better to be in NO relationship than
to be in one that both drains and
damps the self and feeds and amplifies
the STS frequency.

And by acting based on the subtle

clues in his environment, including his
own body, his ability to SEE grows as
well. And when his ability to see
increases, he is better able to make
choices based on seeing the unseen
which act in a beneficial way for the
entire STO polarity. The more the
Shaman exercises Free Will and
ensures the Freedom of Will of others,
the more available the energy of Free
Will becomes to the entire planet. And
this has a huge implication: the more
Free Will is available, the more the
STS domination will NATURALLY
DECREASE! The fewer people who are
"available" for feeding, the less the
STS orientation can grow!

The Shaman is a "specialist in the

sacred." They are able to "see" the
spirits, to go up into the sky and meet
the gods, to descend to the underworld
and fight the demons, sickness, and
death. The shaman's essential role in
the defense of the psychic integrity of
the community depends above all on
his ability to SEE what is hidden and
invisible to the rest and to bring back
direct and RELIABLE information from
the supernatural worlds.

So, perhaps we have some better idea

of the function of the Shaman-
Knight... the Knighted Ones:
Incarnations of the archetype/Thought
Centers of Perseus, the hero who cut
off the head of the Gorgon, who freed
the spirit of limitations, those of a
particular Frequency Resonance
Vibration of sufficient strength and
purity to be able to create a bridge
between man and the gods, to open
the doorways of time.

Not a bad day's work, I think!

Cassiopaean materials Copyright

© 1994-2004 Arkadiusz Jadczyk
and Laura Knight-Jadczyk. All
rights reserved. "Cassiopaea,
Cassiopaean, Cassiopaeans," is a
registered trademark of Arkadiusz
Jadczyk and Laura Knight-
Jadczyk.