0% found this document useful (0 votes)
405 views3 pages

Leadership Transformation at ICRISAT

The document discusses the challenges faced by ICRISAT when Dr. William Dar took over leadership, including leadership failures, financial problems, low staff morale, and lack of clear goals. It describes Dar's background and leadership approach, which emphasized clear vision, motivating employees, decentralization, and improving communication. Under Dar's leadership, ICRISAT's research output and reputation improved, though challenges around funding, understaffing, and proving results to external reviewers remained unresolved.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
405 views3 pages

Leadership Transformation at ICRISAT

The document discusses the challenges faced by ICRISAT when Dr. William Dar took over leadership, including leadership failures, financial problems, low staff morale, and lack of clear goals. It describes Dar's background and leadership approach, which emphasized clear vision, motivating employees, decentralization, and improving communication. Under Dar's leadership, ICRISAT's research output and reputation improved, though challenges around funding, understaffing, and proving results to external reviewers remained unresolved.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
  • CASE STUDY: Transforming ICRISAT
  • Unanswered Challenges

CASE STUDY: TRANSFORMING ICRISAT: THE LEADERSHIP OF DR.

WILLIAM DAR
CHALLENGES FACED BY ICRISAT
• Leadership failure at all levels and abysmal research output. High turnover rates
particularly senior management. Contrasting and divergent view of the leaders
considering 4 DG & 4 DDG’s.
• Financial Problems – Unlimited funding and spending in the late 1990’s without
result lead to loss of funding.
• Shifting of headquarters to Africa from Hyderabad, India due to urgent need for
agricultural research and development
• External Review from CGIAR
• Low staff morale due to egress of talent and high turnover among staff along with
overburdening of work of the remaining employees in ICRISAT
• Lack of collective goal which is a major contributor for providing the success of
the ICRISAT. (Goal - harness the power of technology for agricultural
development, food security, poverty alleviation and environmental protection)
DAR’S LEADERSHIP
• From a farming background in Philippines rose to a Doctorate holder and later
became the executive director of PCARRD.
• Expanded the university’s research capabilities and funding in BSU as professor
and vice president.
• Implemented agricultural training programs.
• Competent and leadership qualities led to him being the first director of BAR
• Implemented a number of programs to benefit farmers and led the council to new
successes through empowerment, knowledge dissemination and resource
mobilization
• Brought in concept of public-private partnership
• Frequently challenged the status quo and believed in continuously raising the bar
in achievement of organizational objectives.
• Personal involvement in research activities along with motivating and guiding of
employees
• Proactive governance and decentralized management
• Believed in mantra “Take Team along” and active involvement of all subordinates.
• Change management – Turned resistance to commitment through involvement.
• Free-flowing channel of communication at all levels
• Articulate the vision for future & align their own individual goals to the goals of
organization.
• Clear idea of the objectives and goals of the organization.
• Every decision taken was imprinted with the leadership
• Realization of the problems and was ready to bring in changes for the achieving of
goals and objective.
DAR’S Action in ICRISAT
• Mapping out a new vision, mission and research strategy for the organization
• Personal involvement in research activities motivated and guided employees by
ensuring that they were well supported in terms of their research development
and their well-being
• Free seeds and seedlings were distributed among the farmers in and around
Hyderabad
• Involved the DDGs in decisions and made sure that all the decision makers acted
as a team
• Encouraged all ICRISAT employees in contributing to the institute’s larger vision
of attaining self-sustainability, and discouraged them from restricting themselves
to their limited domains
• Humane manner Approach - “Science with a human face,” which he incorporated
into the ICRISAT logo
• ICRISAT had spawned substantial research output but didn’t have the ability to
turn that technology into practical assistance for small and marginal farmers
• Capitalized on the transfer of technology to the farm sector by instituting positive
public-private-farmer relationships
• Convinced the shifting of Headquarters to Africa from India should be
reconsidered by raising two major factors - Southeast Asia represented an area in
dire need of research, due to low yield in terms of acreage causing the region to be
ignored and the current location at Hyderabad had the advantage of access to red,
black and intermediate soil types, thus providing a variety of soils for research,
unlike the African locations
• The general untidiness and negative atmosphere on campus was overcome by
establishing a plan to clean up the Hyderabad campus with the help of chief
security officer and set personal example.
UNANSWERED CHALLENGES
• Financial Problems – Lack of Funding
Though the reforms in the institute for upliftment and immediate aligning of the
goals of the institute were achieved, the issue of funding was not resolved. Though
he pushed for a public private model similar to the Philippines there are no further
details of the same.

The way to overcome is to produce results that can be implemented which


matches with the goal of the CGIAR. Though PPP model can be considered as
source of funding but the general concept of this model is aimed at bringing profits
which doesn’t align with the objectives. The main idea is to produce results which
can convince the donors to provide financial inputs. As mentioned in the report,
the institute was able to produce results but cannot be implemented due to issues.
The main aim is to realized these research outputs to be implemented in the SAT
regions.

• Lack of Staff & Overburdening Works


Though the morale of the staff has been improved by the DAR reforms, it doesn’t
solve the problem of understaffing and overwork the researchers are facing.

The solution is to make the Board/CGIAR recognize that the institute is working
in achieving the goals and objective they have set. Informing the public that the
institute is stable and will be able to provided a satisfactory work environment
thereby reducing the insecurity they are feeling. This can help in attracting talents
and reduce the burden on the existing researchers. This can be achieved only by
solving the financial problems faced by the institute.

• External Review from CGIAR


DAR although improved the general untidiness and negative atmosphere on
campus, the ideas to face the external review from CGIAR has not been resolved.

The general atmosphere in the institute along with the team work has been
improved. But the major problem of results is yet to be attended to. In order to
overcome the review, it is necessary to show the members of the review that the
institute is working towards the goal of CCIAR and the results they have obtained
are being implemented in the SAT region at present and can be helpful in obtaining
the aim of CGIAR. Of the promising results that can be implemented at the earliest
shall be pushed for practical assistance to the local farmers in the SAT region.

Common questions

Powered by AI

Despite Dr. William Dar's reforms, ICRISAT faced unresolved challenges such as financial instability, due to ongoing funding shortages, and difficulties in meeting external review expectations from CGIAR. Additional obstacles included understaffing and an overburdened workforce. To address these, strategies could involve enhancing partnerships to secure diversified funding, improving visibility of positive research outcomes to attract more donors, and enhancing recruitment efforts to alleviate staff shortages. Demonstrating real-world application of research to local farmers may also strengthen CGIAR review outcomes .

Dr. William Dar transformed ICRISAT's operations and culture by mapping out a new vision, mission, and research strategy. He implemented proactive governance, decentralized management, and a change management approach that turned resistance into commitment by actively involving employees in decision-making processes. Dar emphasized articulating a vision for the future and aligning individual goals with organizational objectives. He fostered a free-flowing communication channel, encouraged teamwork, and promoted public-private-farmer partnerships to capitalize on technology transfer. By instilling the mantra 'Take Team along,' he ensured team cohesion and active subordinate involvement .

Dr. William Dar addressed high staff turnover and low morale by fostering an environment of empowerment, knowledge dissemination, and resource mobilization. He involved employees in setting a new vision and strategy, motivated them by supporting their research development and well-being, and encouraged a collaborative work culture. Dar's leadership style emphasized teamwork and communication, which led to an improved workplace atmosphere and increased morale. However, while morale improved, challenges of understaffing and workload remained due to financial constraints .

Dr. William Dar's initiatives, such as mapping a new vision and mission for ICRISAT and promoting teamwork in decision-making, directly aligned with CGIAR's broader objectives of agricultural development, food security, and environmental protection. This alignment fostered a cohesive direction for research and development, increased the relevance of research outputs, and aimed to ensure these outputs were applicable and beneficial to small and marginal farmers. Consequently, Dar's leadership fostered an environment where research was more strategic, targeted, and potentially impactful, improving both internal leadership perceptions and external stakeholder engagement .

The effectiveness of the public-private partnership model in addressing ICRISAT's funding issues is limited due to its intrinsic conflict with CGIAR's non-profit goals. While the model can potentially bring in funds by aligning with market-driven objectives, this focus on profitability does not align with CGIAR's mission to address agricultural development and food security without profit motives. Thus, while public-private partnerships might offer short-term financial relief, they do not provide a sustainable solution if not aligned with CGIAR's core values and objectives .

ICRISAT faced financial challenges due to unlimited funding and spending in the late 1990s without yielding results, leading to a loss of funding. Dr. William Dar attempted to address these issues by pushing for a public-private partnership model similar to what he successfully implemented in the Philippines. The goal was to produce results aligned with CGIAR's goals, which could convince donors to provide financial inputs. However, although the public-private partnership model was considered, it conflicted with the CGIAR's non-profit objectives, and the issue of financial sustainability remained unresolved .

Dr. William Dar objected to relocating ICRISAT's headquarters from Hyderabad to Africa, arguing that Southeast Asia required substantial research attention due to low yields and remained a neglected area. Furthermore, Hyderabad's diverse soil types offered a unique advantage for diverse agricultural research compared to African locations. Maintaining the location allowed ICRISAT to leverage existing infrastructural and environmental conditions ideal for research variety, potentially enhancing its research outputs' effectiveness and applicability, while providing strategic alignment with regional agricultural needs .

Dr. William Dar greatly influenced the integration of technology into practical applications for small and marginal farmers by promoting public-private-farmer partnerships. He focused on overcoming the gap between substantial research output and its practical implementation, a prevailing issue at ICRISAT. Through these initiatives, Dr. Dar was able to capitalize on technology transfer, ensuring that research findings were not just theoretical but applied on the ground, directly benefiting farmers .

Dr. William Dar's 'Science with a human face' approach was reflected in ICRISAT's operational practices by emphasizing the human elements in scientific research and institutional processes. This approach fostered a more humane and supportive working environment, facilitating open communication and collaboration, which improved employee morale and engagement. Operationally, it translated into initiatives that considered the socio-economic impacts of research and emphasized practical application to address real-world farmer needs, demonstrating a commitment to both scientific excellence and social responsibility .

Dr. William Dar's leadership style, characterized by proactive governance, decentralized management, and inclusive decision-making, played a crucial role in reforming ICRISAT. By articulating a clear vision for the future and aligning individual and organizational goals, he cultivated a sense of ownership and purpose among staff, which enhanced operational effectiveness. His approach of 'Science with a human face' and promoting public-private-farmer relationships rebuilt ICRISAT's external image while instilling confidence in its internal processes. These efforts resulted in a substantial increase in research output and capitalizing on technology transfers .

You might also like