0% found this document useful (0 votes)
106 views1 page

Microteaching Evaluation Guidelines

The document provides guidelines for evaluating teachers during a microteaching activity with 9 criteria. Each criteria is scored on a scale from 1-4. A score of 1 is unacceptable, 2 is fair, 3 is good, and 4 is very good. The criteria cover areas like preparation, accomplishing goals, using workshop techniques, creating a positive learning environment, fulfilling the purpose of the activity, instruction clarity, openness to new ideas, language proficiency, and professional appearance.

Uploaded by

Omar Alfaro
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
106 views1 page

Microteaching Evaluation Guidelines

The document provides guidelines for evaluating teachers during a microteaching activity with 9 criteria. Each criteria is scored on a scale from 1-4. A score of 1 is unacceptable, 2 is fair, 3 is good, and 4 is very good. The criteria cover areas like preparation, accomplishing goals, using workshop techniques, creating a positive learning environment, fulfilling the purpose of the activity, instruction clarity, openness to new ideas, language proficiency, and professional appearance.

Uploaded by

Omar Alfaro
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Microteaching Evaluation Guidelines

4 3 2 1
Criteria Very good Good Fair Unacceptable
1. Did the teacher prepare a The teacher carefully analyzed the The teacher’s plan showed clear The teacher’s plan showed an The teacher did not make any kind of
micro lesson plan which microteaching situation and planned teaching aims and learning goals. understanding of teaching aims but preparation for microteaching activities.
included teaching aims and activities with clear and attainable goals in learning goals were not evident.
learning goals? mind.

2. Did the teacher accomplish The teacher successfully accomplished The teacher attained what s/he set out The teacher made an attempt to The teacher did not accomplish any
teaching aims and learning his/her aims and goals. to do. accomplish aims and goals. aims or goals due to lack of preparation.
goals?

The teacher was completely at ease with The teacher demonstrated confidence The teacher showed some The teacher was confused about how to
3. Did the teacher employ the workshop techniques and was able to use when using the techniques. understanding of techniques but still use techniques, perhaps due to lack of
techniques presented during them to achieve microteaching objectives. requires additional support and interest or attention paid during the
the workshop effectively? practice to be able to use them workshop session, or failure to prepare.
confidently.
The teacher consistently had a positive The teacher was friendly; made The teacher was serious and formal, The teacher had no positive rapport
4. Did the teacher create an rapport with students and showed interest appropriate jokes and comments to and limited him/herself to plain class with students.
open and warm and respect for their individual opinions make class fun/enjoyable. delivery. The teacher/students interactions were
atmosphere? and experiences. negative or inappropriate.
The teacher completely fulfilled the The teacher was aware of the purpose The teacher followed trainer’s The teacher was confused regarding the
5. Did the teacher fulfill the purpose of the microteaching activity of microteaching activities and was able instructions to the letter but, at times, purpose of the microteaching activity
purpose of microteaching to fulfill it. seemed to lose sight of the activity and was therefore unable to fulfill it.
activity? purpose.
6. Was instruction clear and The teacher’s microteaching performance The teacher knew what s/he was doing Although the teacher seemed to be The teacher lost track of what s/he was
focused? served as a model for the rest of the and focused on using new techniques to confused at times, s/he stuck to his doing and completely failed to use new
participants. effectively convey his/her message. micro lesson plan and got through techniques or accomplish anything.
with it.
7. Was the teacher open to The teacher showed great interest in new The teacher was open to new ideas and The teacher was open to new ideas The teacher did not demonstrate any
workshop ideas and willing techniques and immediately identified willing to try them out. but still finds it hard to leave old willingness to incorporate workshop
to incorporate them to how s/he can use them in class. habits behind. ideas to his/her teaching.
his/her teaching?
8. Did the teacher The teacher was constantly able to speak The teacher made no mistakes at all. The teacher made one or two The teacher constantly made mistakes
demonstrate proficiency in English with sufficient accuracy and The teacher demonstrated an mistakes when using the language in oral or written communication.
the English language and fluency to participate effectively in formal understanding of how language content content being taught. S/he constantly mispronounced words,
acted as a good language and informal communication on a variety is used for real communication. or used the wrong word or sentence
model? of topics. stress.
9. Did the teacher project a The teacher constantly had a good The teacher’s demeanor was The teacher’s image was clean and The teacher’s image was shabby.
professional image? presence in the classroom. professional and business-like, yet neat.
The teacher was knowledgeable and friendly.
projected confidence.

D.R. ® 2014 Organización Harmon Hall A.C.


Microteaching Evaluation Guidelines

You might also like