Scribd
Upload
126 views1 page

Survey Instrument Validation Guide

The document provides a validation rating scale for a survey instrument. It lists 11 criteria for evaluating the instrument, such as whether the items are relevant, clear, culturally appropriate, and able to be completed in a given time. Respondents are asked to rate their agreement with each criteria from 1-5. Space is also provided for comments and suggestions to improve the instrument. The validator is asked to sign and date the form upon completion.

Uploaded by

JINKY RAMIREZ
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
126 views1 page

Survey Instrument Validation Guide

The document provides a validation rating scale for a survey instrument. It lists 11 criteria for evaluating the instrument, such as whether the items are relevant, clear, culturally appropriate, and able to be completed in a given time. Respondents are asked to rate their agreement with each criteria from 1-5. Space is also provided for comments and suggestions to improve the instrument. The validator is asked to sign and date the form upon completion.

Uploaded by

JINKY RAMIREZ
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

SURVEY INSTRUMENT VALIDATION RATING SCALE

(Adapted from Oducado, 2020)

Directions: Please indicate your degree of agreement or disagreement on the


statements provided below by encircling the number which corresponds to your best
judgment.

1- Strongly Disagree 2- Disagree 3- Undecided 4- Agree 5- Strongly Agree

CRITERIA SCALE
The items in the instrument are relevant to answer the objectives of 1 2 3 4 5
the study.
The items in the instrument can obtain depth to constructs being 1 2 3 4 5
measured.
The instrument has an appropriate sample of items for the construct 1 2 3 4 5
being measured.
The items and their alternatives are neither too narrow nor limited in 1 2 3 4 5
its content.
The items in the instrument are stated clearly. 1 2 3 4 5
The items on the instrument can elicit responses which are stable, 1 2 3 4 5
definite, consistent and not conflicting.
The terms adapted in the scale in the scale are culturally 1 2 3 4 5
appropriate.
The layout or format of the instrument is technically sound. 1 2 3 4 5
The responses on the scale show a reasonable range of variation. 1 2 3 4 5
The instrument is not too short or long enough that the participants 1 2 3 4 5
will be able to answer it within a given time.
The instrument is interesting such that participants will be induced 1 2 3 4 5
to respond to it and accomplish it fully.
The instrument as a whole could answer the basic purpose for which 1 2 3 4 5
it is designed.
The instrument is culturally acceptable when administered in the 1 2 3 4 5
local setting.

Comments and Suggestions


_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________ Date: _______________________________


Signature over Printed Name of Validator Position & Office: ____________________

You might also like