Untitled
Untitled
com/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
Blackfoot Grammar
third edition
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
This page intentionally left blank
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
Blackfoot Grammar
THIRD EDITION
Donald G. Frantz
♾
Printed on acid-free paper.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
Contents
Acknowledgements vii
Chapter 13 Demonstratives 69
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
vi
Chapter 14 Possessives 76
Chapter 15 Allomorphy 84
References 198
Index 200
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
Acknowledgements
Research upon which this work is based began in late 1960, so a very large
number of people have had a part in it. I was fortunate that when I began to
study Blackfoot (under the auspices of the Summer Institute of Linguistics), Allan
Taylor, more recently of the University of Colorado, but then a doctoral candidate
at the University of California, Berkeley, had already spent a summer of research
on the Blackfoot language in Montana. His generous sharing of his findings got
me off to a comfortable start. Since that time he has contributed to my knowledge
and understanding of Blackfoot structure in various ways, not the least of which
is through his PhD dissertation (Taylor 1969).
Another person who has influenced my view of Blackfoot grammar over a
period of many years and has brought various facts about the language to my
attention is Gregory Thomson. I have benefited repeatedly from his insights, and
his name will be seen in several footnotes.
Shortly before publication of the first edition of the grammar, Eung-Do Cook
of the University of Calgary made helpful suggestions and comments on the
manuscript. I also benefited from suggestions of four anonymous reviewers.
A large number of Blackfoot speakers have provided data and insights over
the years. Those who gave extensive help are Irene Butterfly and Agnes Rider
of the Blackfeet Tribe in Montana, and Rosie Ayoungman, Matthew Manyguns,
Mike Peacemaker, and Frances and Bona Blackkettle of the Siksika Reserve in
Alberta. During the first fifteen years of my tenure at the University of Lethbridge,
First Nations students and faculty provided data and corrected examples in earlier
drafts of this work. Again, there are far too many to mention all of them here, but
Professor Leroy Little Bear, Martin Heavy Head, Mary Ruth McDougall, Lena
Russell, Norma Russell, Sandra Bruised Head, and Mary Atoa come to mind.
Mary’s corrections of several examples in the book are especially appreciated.
Finally, many non-Native students at the University of Lethbridge have helped
improve this book by asking probing questions about its content. Among those
who have contributed the most in this way are Marguerite Koole and Michelle
Deering.
Peter Pankonin, a former student of my Blackfoot course at the University of
Lethbridge, has made a unique combination of contributions to the third edition
of this book. He took responsibility upon himself to prepare the manuscript for
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
publication, putting untold hours into getting the layout perfect, including Index,
page numbers, and especially alignment of examples. In so doing, he noticed
numerous inconsistencies that we were able to correct, many of which depended
on his understanding of Blackfoot grammar. Thanks to him, the entire Grammar
will be more useful to its users.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
Preface to the Third Edition
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
Preface to the Second Edition
In this edition I have added two new chapters and two additional appendices. I
also have done extensive revision of chapter 2, as well as made corrections and
additions to most other chapters. Exercises have been added at the end of several
later chapters.
Since publication of the first edition, there have been two major developments
that bear on this grammar and its use. The first is that as the Blackfoot language
is used less and less, it is changing rapidly, with sub-dialects and idiolects arising
as a result of the lack of feedback from fluent speakers. Changes I have observed
include loss or shortening of many inflectional suffixes, and, probably as a result of
the loss of suffixes, non-use or partial use of the category ‘minor third person’ (see
chapter 2). Also, in the case of reported data from at least one speaker, it appears
that noun inflection marking ‘non-referring/non-particular’ (see chapter 2) is non-
existent, and the referring versus non-referring distinction is marked by presence
versus absence of demonstratives. Nevertheless, I have attempted to keep this
grammar as a description of the Blackfoot language as it was before these more
recent changes appeared. (It is still possible to find speakers whose Blackfoot
is like that spoken in the last half of the twentieth century.) The second recent
development is that other linguists have begun to do research on the language, and
are making contributions to better understanding of the structure of the language.
I only regret that this second development didn’t take place before the first.1
1
In this regard, I would like to encourage researchers to work with more than one Blackfoot
speaker. Getting two or more speakers together is an ideal way to mitigate the chance that what the
researchers are investigating and describing is the language of a single speaker rather than that of a
community.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
Preface to the First Edition
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
This page intentionally left blank
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
CHAPTER 1
THE VOWELS
1
Appendix C includes a more technical phonetic description of the sounds of Blackfoot.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
Blackfoot Grammar
i has a quality which varies from that of the i of English kiss to that of the i
of machine; it always has the latter quality when long (written double—see
below).
ísska ‘pail’ mííni ‘berry’
o has a quality much like the o of English so, except before double consonants,
in which case it has a quality more like the o of woman.
oma ‘that one’ ónni ‘his father’
óki ‘hello/okay now’ sokóttaat ‘spit!’
DIPHTHONGS
ai varies among speakers and from dialect to dialect. Before double consonants
(see below) it is about like the ai of English said:
áínnisiwa ‘he descends/falls’
áíkkiwa ‘he blows a whistle’
Before a glottal stop (written ’ ; see below) or another vowel i it is similar to the ai
of English paid (though on the Siksika Reserve it may sound like the i of English
bite):
áí’poyiwa ‘he speaks’
náíipisstsiwa ‘it is cloth’
In other positions of a word, this diphthong will sound like the ai of English plaid
on the Blood Reserve, but like the ai of English paid on the Siksika Reserve:
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
3
ao is like the aw of dawn (for those English speakers who pronounce the latter
differently than they do Don); to approximate it, pronounce the a of English
father with rounded lips.
áókska’siwa ‘he’s running’
áóttakiwa ‘bartender’
ponokáómitaawa ‘horse’
Before a glottal stop it may sound more like the ou of English out.
ákao’toowa ‘he has arrived’
Before a long consonant, it may sound like the Blackfoot vowel i (see above)
pronounced with rounded lips.
nitáakotoissikópii ‘I will go rest’
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
Blackfoot Grammar
pitch than an unaccented syllable earlier in the word; the accented syllable will
still be relatively higher in pitch as compared with the syllable which follows it,
however, as is kó in the following word:
máátaissikópiiwa ‘he’s not resting’
There are a few words in which the pitch falls noticeably during the pronunciation
of a long vowel; in these cases only the first of the two letters which represent a
long vowel is accented; e.g., áaksoyiwa ‘he will eat.’2 There are also sequences
of a long vowel or diphthong (see below) followed by an accented vowel; these
have a pitch which falls and then rises; e.g., maaáhsi ‘her elder relation’; maoóyi
‘mouth.’
SEMIVOWELS
w and y are glides with much the same quality as English w and y when the latter
occur between vowels, as in aware and yo-yo.
áwaaniiwa ‘he says’ áyo’kaawa ‘he’s sleeping’
CONSONANTS
s is similar to the English sound usually represented by the same letter, except
that the Blackfoot s is usually made with the tongue tip up, rather than behind
the lower teeth as English s usually is. (The s of English purser is very much
like the average Blackfoot s).
2
There are also some cases in which the pitch falls through a sequence of three vowels; see
chapter 15, section C.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
5
p, t, and k of Blackfoot are like their English counterparts except that they do not
have the aspiration (puff of air) which usually follows p, t, and k in English;
because of this non-aspiration, they often sound like b, d, and g to English
speakers. English p, t, and k preceded by s in words such as spin, sting, and
skin are much like the Blackfoot sounds.
poos ‘cat’ takáa ‘who?’ kitsími ‘door’
ts and ks, though written as sequences and thus not requiring additional letters
in the alphabet, are single sound units in the language called affricates. To
produce these sounds, one begins with the tongue position of the sound usually
written with the first letter (t or k), but before it is released the front part of the
tongue assumes the position it normally has for the sound s, so that the t or k
is released into the s.
tsimá ‘where?’ nítsoyi ‘I ate’
ksisóyi ‘teakettle’ níkso’kowaiksi ‘my relatives’
h is a palatal fricative or ‘guttural,’ much like the German sound written as ch.
Like the German sound, it is greatly affected by the preceding vowel so that
after i it is made at the highest point on the roof of the mouth, while after o or
a it is made nearer the back of the roof of the mouth.3
ihkitsíka ‘seven’ óhkotoki ‘stone’ ksááhkoi ‘dirt’
3
The letter h is also used for a sound like the h of English hot. It occurs at the start of a few
interjections, e.g., há’ayáa ‘oh-oh!’ Since the palatal fricative occurs only following vowels, there is
no danger of confusion as a result of using the same letter for a different sound in these interjections.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
Blackfoot Grammar
than it is for those consonants when written singly.4 All consonants except h and
’ occur distinctively long:
kiipíppo ‘one hundred’ ísska ‘pail’
áípottaawa ‘he’s flying’ iyímmit ‘laugh!’
nitákkaawa ‘my friend’ nínna ‘my father’
iksíssiwa ‘he is tough’ soká’pssiwa ‘he is good’
4
Most English speakers get a similar effect across word boundaries in English phrases such as
sick cow, in which the phonetic [k] at the end of sick combines with the initial phonetic [k] of cow
to give a long phonetic [k:]; this is quite like the kk of Blackfoot (except that Blackfoot kk lacks the
aspiration of English k — see above.)
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
7
It was stated near the beginning of this chapter that vowels and diphthongs
have a slightly different quality when they are immediately followed by long
consonants. In such a position, Blackfoot a, i, and o sound like the vowels of
English cut, kiss, and bush, respectively. Though not stated earlier, this effect
on vowel and diphthong quality before long consonants is present even if an s
separates the vowel and long consonant. So, for example, the ai of áísttsiiwa
‘it hurts’ sounds like the ai of English said even though the diphthong is not
immediately before the tt. However, the situation is even more complicated than
this: long aa, ii, and oo retain their usual qualities even before long consonants,
though in such a position their duration is reduced. So, for example, if one hears a
vowel like the a of father and it is followed by a long consonant, then that sound
should be spelled aa.
Supplemental Material
A more complex case is the phonetic sequence [oi’ss], which can represent not only oi’ss, but
o’yss and oyss as well. It can represent o’yss because anticipation of the y tongue position during
the glottal stop produces a phonetic diphthong. It can represent oyss because a predictable glottal
stop is heard whenever a semivowel (w or y) or nasal (m or n) is immediately followed by s.
In cases such as this, one must either make an arbitrary choice or be guided by grammatical
analysis of the word involved, if the grammatical makeup of the word is known. In this particular
case, if the sequence [oi’ss] is part of the sequence [ooi’ssini] ‘eating,’ it is analyzable as ooyi, the
vai stem ‘eat,’ plus the suffix hsin, which makes nouns from intransitive verbs. Given the fact
that ihs is generally realized as ss, we spell the word as ooyssini. We do not need to include the
predictable glottal stop, though to do so would not in any sense produce an incorrect spelling.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
CHAPTER 2
Comparing these singular and plural Blackfoot forms, we note that the singulars
all end with yi and the plurals end with istsi. The remainder of each word we
can call the stem. The stem carries the core meaning which is expressed in the
English column; e.g., í’ksisako carries the meaning ‘meat,’ but is not a word by
itself. To be a word, it requires either the suffix yi, which indicates ‘singular’ or
the suffix istsi, which indicates ‘plural.’ (Notice that this differs from the situation
in English, where the stem alone can be used as a word.)
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
9
Removing the plural suffix to leave the stem in each case, we see that the singular
appears to be marked by a suffix i rather than by yi. We further note that these
last four stems all end in consonants, whereas the first group of nouns stems all
end in vowels. We could say that the singular suffix has two shapes, yi and i, used
after vowels and consonants, respectively. But an alternative hypothesis is that y
is lost after consonants. If this hypothesis is never falsified, i.e., we never find y
after a consonant, then rather than say there are two shapes for the singular suffix,
we can say it has the one basic shape yi; the y is then deleted by a phonological
rule which deletes any /y/ that occurs after a consonant. This latter solution is
greatly to be preferred, as it does not make reference to ‘singular’ or to just one
suffix, but states a true generalization about what sound sequences are permitted
in Blackfoot.
Notice the accents of the following examples:
Singular English Plural
matsiníyi tongue matsiníístsi
pootsitsíyi soft ash pootsitsíístsi
aatakóyi previous evening aatakóístsi
Based on the singular, these stems have an accent on the last vowel, and when
the plural suffix is added, the first vowel of the suffix is also accented. This can
be accounted for by another phonological rule: The first vowel of a suffix will be
accented if an immediately preceding vowel is accented. We will call this Accent
Spread.
Consider now noun stems which, based on their singular form, end in long
vowels:
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
Blackfoot Grammar
Notice that in each case the long vowel is apparently shortened in the plural.
We can account for this by positing a third phonological rule: A long vowel is
shortened before a suffix which starts with a vowel, a process we will call Vowel
Shortening.
Now notice that if the long vowel which is shortened carries an accent, as we
see in the stem for ‘water,’ it will be carried over to the vowel of the plural suffix.
This is accounted for nicely if Accent Spread applies after Vowel Shortening. For
example,
The suffixes we have seen for singular and plural are used on only one of two
subclasses of Blackfoot nouns. Here are examples from the other noun subclass:
The suffixes here are wa1 and iksi. A close look at these examples will make it
clear that the rules of Vowel Shortening and Accent Spread apply here as with the
previous class of nouns, as they should, because phonological rules are supposed
to apply across the board. And since the /w/ of the singular sufffix is gone after
consonants, we can generalize the rule which deleted /y/ and now make it a rule
which deletes any semivowel after a consonant; we will now call it Semivowel
Loss.
1
The final vowel of this suffix is rarely audible, and many speakers completely omit the entire
suffix. However, if omitting it leaves a vowel at the end of the word, that vowel remains voiced, unlike
other word-final vowels, which are generally voiceless.
Spelling out this suffix does cause confusion for many new readers if they are familiar with the
generic suffix waa’ which is always voiced (see Frantz 1971, pg. 230).
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
11
B. GrAMMATICAL GENDEr
In popular usage, the term ‘gender’ is associated almost exclusively with sex
categories. This usage corresponds to the fact that English nouns are classified as
masculine, feminine, or neuter, and this classification is reflected in the choice of
singular pronouns he, she, or it. But technically the term ‘gender’ can be applied
to any at least partially arbitrary classification of nouns in the grammatical system
of a language. To make it clear that we are using the term in the technical sense,
we will refer to such noun classification as grammatical gender.
Blackfoot, like other Algonquian languages (such as Cree, Ojibwa, Micmac,
Cheyenne, etc.), classifies noun stems into two groups which are often labeled
animate and inanimate. (In the Blackfoot Dictionary of Stems, Roots, and Affixes2
[henceforth, ‘the Dictionary’], animate gender noun stems are labeled nan and
inanimate gender noun stems are labeled nin.) All Blackfoot noun stems belong
to one of these two grammatical gender classes, and this classification is evident
throughout Blackfoot grammar. The two ways of marking singular and plural that
we saw above are the result of this classification. Notice that up to this point, most
of the nouns that take suffixes wa and iksi designate living beings such as animals,
people, and spirits. None of the nouns that take singular and plural suffixes yi and
istsi designate animals, persons, or spirits. But many nouns that do not designate
living beings also belong to the animate gender class, so other than being able
to predict that a noun designating an animal, person, or spirit will belong to the
animate gender class, one must learn the gender class of any noun by hearing it
used in grammatical context, or looking it up in the Dictionary.
It is important to realize that grammatical gender classification says very little
about how people view the world. (E.g., in French the noun la table ‘table’ belongs
to the so-called feminine gender class, but surely the native speaker of French
doesn’t think there is anything feminine about a table.) So the fact that Blackfoot
noun stems such as pokón ‘ball,’ íssk ‘pail,’ and isttoán ‘knife’ are classed with
noun stems such as aakíí ‘woman,’ pookáá ‘child,’ and imitáá ‘dog’ as being of
animate gender should not be construed as an indication that the Blackfoot speaker
thinks of balls, pails, and knives as somehow ‘alive.’ Grammatical gender is a
classification of the noun stems themselves, not of the entities to which they
refer. Nevertheless, as stated above, a person learning Blackfoot can be sure the
words for animals, people, or spirits will be of animate gender. But the gender
of other nouns simply must be memorized (though there are some other natural
groupings which are helpful to recognize; e.g., stems for most metal tools are
of animate gender). Here are a few more noun stems which are unpredictably
animate in gender:
2
Frantz and Russell (2017).
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
Blackfoot Grammar
Non-permanent Consonants
There is a large number of noun stems which have an n or s that is present only
before certain suffixes; a few stems have an m which is present only before the
same suffixes. When listing such stems we will indicate these non-permanent
consonants by the symbols M, N, and S, respectively.3 M, N, and S are lost (i.e.,
do not show up as m, n, and s) before the pluralizers:
Stem Gloss Singular Plural
to’ahsiM ‘sock’ áto’ahsima áto’ahsiiksi
máíipssiM ‘belt’ máíipssimi máíipssiistsi
asóka’siM ‘dress’ asóka’simi asóka’siistsi
pokóN ‘ball’ pokóna pokóíksi
isttoáN ‘knife’ isttoána isttoáíksi
áwanááN ‘rattle’ áwanáána áwaanáíksi
atsikíN ‘shoe’ atsikíni atsikíístsi
moksíS ‘awl’ moksísa moksííksi
Sometimes when using a noun, we don’t have in mind a particular item (or group
of items) from the class of things that we name by that noun; just any one (or
bunch) will do. For example, you might send a son or daughter to the store with
the following instructions: ‘Get a loaf of bread, some milk, and a dozen apples.’
You don’t have any particular loaf of bread, carton(s) of milk, or dozen apples in
mind, so the nouns bread, milk, and apples do not refer to any particular items.
Or you may use a noun in such a way that it cannot refer to an actual entity. This
would be true in sentences such as ‘I don’t have any milk,’ or ‘I wish you had
some apples.’ In either case we say that the words bread, milk, and apples are
non-referring.
3
This device is not used in the Dictionary. There stems are listed with such non-permanent
consonants present; one can determine that they are non-permanent by comparing the examples
provided.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
13
Here, because the speaker has a particular loaf of bread, some particular portion
of milk, and a particular dozen apples in mind, we say that these nouns do refer
because they are particular in reference. The endings on Blackfoot nouns are
determined partly by whether or not the nouns refer. If they are not particular in
reference (i.e., non-referring), a suffix -i is added, and it does not matter whether
the speaker is talking about one or more than one item. So if you say kókkit owai
‘Give me egg(s),’ in which ‘eggs’ has the non-particular suffix, you may get one
or more eggs. Here are other examples of nouns with the non-particular suffix -i;
notice that both animate and inanimate gender nouns take this suffix:
pookáí ‘child(ren)’
í’ksisakoi ‘meat(s)’
ómahksikimii ‘lake(s)’
The non-particular and singular particular forms of many inanimate gender nouns
are identical. As seen in section B, inanimate gender nouns which are particular in
reference add a suffix -yi when singular, as in the following examples:
owááyi ‘egg’ nookóówayi ‘my home’
As we have also seen, y is lost after consonants, and what remains of the suffix
-yi is identical in shape to the non-particular suffix -i just discussed. Consequently,
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
Blackfoot Grammar
all inanimate gender stems which end in permanent consonants have singular and
non-particular forms which are not distinguishable; e.g.
But stems which end in M, N, and S have singular forms which do differ from
their non-particular forms because M, N, and S are retained before the singular
suffix (the y of the singular suffix is lost as after other consonants):
Stem English Singular Non-particular form
asóka’siM ‘jacket’ asóka’simi asóka’sii
atsikíN ‘shoe’ atsikíni atsikíí
mo’tsíS ‘hand/arm’ mo’tsísi mo’tsíí
Have you ever been troubled by the ambiguity in English sentences such as this:
Clyde told his son that he could help him? When we hear such a sentence we
don’t know whether the speaker means for the pronoun he to refer to ‘Clyde’ or
to ‘his son.’
But in Blackfoot, the equivalent sentence would not have this ambiguity,
because Blackfoot would classify ‘Clyde’ and ‘his son’ as grammatically different.
This difference would be reflected in the form of the Blackfoot equivalent of that
he could help him, so we would be able to tell which of these persons is subject
of ‘help.’
Here, roughly, is how it works: when two or more nouns of animate gender
occur in the same sentence, only one of them can be what we will call major
third person;4 the others, if particular in reference (see section C above), must be
demoted to minor third person.5
So if you say e.g., ‘The man killed the deer’ in Blackfoot, either ‘the man’ or
‘the deer’ must be minor third person. When the speaker has a choice, as in this
4
Called ‘proximate’ in most literature on Algonquian languages.
Two or more major third persons are permitted if they are conjoined, as in ‘The man and woman
are dancing’ or ‘I have a dog and a cat.’
5
Called ‘obviative’ in most literature on Algonquian languages.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
15
example, the noun he chooses to make major third person is thereby made more
prominent in that portion of the discourse.
Minor third person singular is indicated on nouns by another suffix -yi (y is
lost after consonants by Semivowel Loss). Here are four examples. (Subscripted
numerals are used to indicate major third person3 and minor third person4.)
imitááyi ‘dog4’ póósi ‘cat4’
aakííyi ‘woman4’ ísski ‘pail4’
The animate singular suffix -wa discussed in section A is actually the major third
person singular suffix. Here are more examples:
imitááwa ‘dog3’ nínna ‘my father3’
aakííwa ‘woman3’ ísska ‘pail3’
niksíssta ‘my mother3’
We have seen that M, N, and S are retained (as m, n, and s) before -wa; the same
is true before -yi. But remember that the y and w of these suffixes are lost because
they cannot remain after consonants:
pokóN- ‘ball’ pokóna ‘ball3’ pokóni ‘ball4’
moksíS- ‘awl’ moksísa ‘awl3’ moksísi ‘awl4’
The pluralizer -iksi, seen in section B of this chapter, is used for both major third
and minor third person plural. It will be glossed as ‘an.p’ from this point on.
6
Possessive affixes are treated in chapter 14.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
Blackfoot Grammar
Note: No noun will have more than one of these suffixes at a time.
non-particular/non-referring -i
particular animate inanimate
3 4
sg -wa -yi -yi
pl -iksi -istsi
PLurAL R
‘sage’ ka’ksimóyi
‘dove’ kakkóówa
‘turnip’ má’siksi
3. Change the following nouns from major third person singular to minor third
person singular:
a. nínaawa ‘man’ c. nitána ‘my daughter’
b. póósa ‘cat’ d. isttoána ‘knife’
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
17
4. The following is a list of all the morphemes seen in the forms given as a–d of
the preceding exercise; notice that in a list of morphemes, both a form (shape)
and gloss (meaning or function) are provided for each one, and no morpheme is
listed more than once:
nínaa ‘man’ isttoáN ‘knife’
póós ‘cat’ itán ‘daughter’
n- ‘my’ -wa ‘major third person singular (3s)’
5. List the morphemes you see in the following words: (Note: List each morpheme
(form and meaning) only once, as was demonstrated in exercise 4.)
póósiksi ‘cats’ nínaiksi ‘men’
kitána ‘your daughter’ nitániksi ‘my daughters’
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
CHAPTER 3
Intransitive Verbs
Verbs which occur with a subject but no object are called intransitive verbs. For
example, in English, run, die, and yawn are intransitive; we say that someone (their
subject) does the action described by the verb, but not that (s)he does it to anyone
or anything (an object). On the other hand, hit, kill, love are transitive verbs
because they take objects; i.e., we must hit, kill, or love someone or something.
(We begin to discuss transitive verbs in chapter 7.)
A. PErSON MArKErS
What portion of the first one indicates that the speaker (‘I’) is the subject? What
portion of the second indicates addressee (‘you’)? And what marks major third
person (‘he’) in the last example?
Blackfoot verbs are marked to indicate the person (i.e., speaker, addressee, or
other) of their subjects. (Each of the examples above is a single word; the portions
nit- and kit- are prefixes, while -wa is a suffix.)1 The remainder of each verb (the
portion common to all three of the verb forms) is the stem.
1
We will later refer to these markers interchangeably as person affixes or agreement affixes.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
19
Can we maintain our idea that nit- and kit- mark ‘speaker’ and ‘addressee’? If
so, we are left with an extra s in these new examples. Perhaps certain verbs take
nits- and kits-, while others take nit- and kit-? But compare the same verb seen
above when it has an intervening prefix á, meaning ‘not an instantaneous event’
(later glossed ‘durative’):
These examples suggest that there is some other reason for the s after nit- and kit-.
Let’s look at just a bit more evidence and then the answer to our problem of the
extra s will be forthcoming:
Comparing this word to those seen in section A, what part of this word makes it a
negative statement? Now consider the negative of ‘relate’:
There is the ubiquitous s again, this time after the negative prefix maat. Do you
have a suggestion now as to its source?
If you suggested that an s intervenes whenever t is immediately followed by i,
your suggestion is correct. The sequence ti never occurs in Blackfoot; whenever
we would expect ti, we find instead tsi. Thus we have a hard and fast rule of
Blackfoot: t + i becomes tsi.3
Have you ever been put in an awkward position because the person to whom you
were speaking thought you were including him/her when you said we, while in
actuality you were using we in reference only to yourself and someone else? For
example, you might have said to an acquaintance, ‘We are invited to the Joneses
tonight,’ meaning only yourself and your spouse. But the one to whom you are
speaking can interpret the we as including him.
Such a misunderstanding could not arise if you were speaking Blackfoot.
Blackfoot grammar requires a speaker to indicate whether or not the person to
2
The portion atsiksi in parentheses is part of the non-affirmative third person singular suffix,
generally used in negatives and questions involving third person singular as subject or object; see
chapter 21.
3
Recall from chapter 1 that ts represents a complex sound unit called an affricate.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
20 Blackfoot Grammar
whom one is speaking (the addressee) is included in the ‘action.’ So if you want
to say, ‘We are going to their house’ in Blackfoot, there are two options, and you
must choose between them. Notice the different form of the first word in each
example:
1. Nitáakitapoohpinnaan ookóówaawayi.
‘We (not you) will go to their house.’
2. Áakitapaoo’pa ookóówaawayi.
‘We (including you) will go to their house.’
These two types of reference, which English includes in the pronoun we but which
Blackfoot distinguishes, are traditionally termed ‘exclusive we’(speaker and at
least one other, but not the addressee(s)) and ‘inclusive we’ (speaker, addressee,
and perhaps others).
Up until shortly after the time of Shakespeare, English distinguished singular and
plural in its terms for addressees. Thus, in the nominative case, thou was used for
reference to a single addressee, and ye for reference to more than one addressee or
to an addressee and other(s). Some modern American English dialects make this
distinction even now, using the contraction y’all for a plural.
This same distinction is an inescapable part of Blackfoot grammar. Any
reference to the addressee requires a choice between singular and plural. Here are
some examples showing the contrast:
‘yousg’ kiistówa ‘youpl’ kiistówaawa
‘(you) eat!’ ooyít ooyík
‘I know you’ kítssksinoo kítssksinoohpoaawa
‘your mother’ kiksíssta kiksísstoaawa
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
Chapter 3: Intransitive Verbs 21
Pronunciation Notes
1. Blackfoot vowels at the end of words are usually voiceless (softly whispered).
2. A short (single) vowel is voiceless before the palatal fricative h; in fact, the
vowel and the h are pronounced simultaneously.5
EXERCISES
1. Add the missing prefixes; remember the rule for ‘unexpected s’:
2. For the following sentences and phrases, indicate whether the English we, us,
or our is inclusive (includes addressee) or exclusive:
a. Let’s go to town.
b. Hey, sis, (our) mom is calling.
4
Though I list the meaning ‘he’ for most singular animate third persons, ‘she’ or ‘it’ might be
more appropriate translations at times; see chapter 2, section A.
5
As Greg Thomson (personal communication) points out, because the palatal fricative h always
assimilates to the place and rounding features of the preceding vowel, it is more accurate to say that
short vowels are dropped before h, leaving the h with their features, including syllabicity.
6
Because this interruption at the glottis is totally predictable, it need not be represented in the
spelling of such sequences because the glottal stop does not remain in environments where the fol-
lowing vowel is voiced, as it would if the glottal stop were an integral part of the morpheme involved.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
22 Blackfoot Grammar
3. For the following sentences, indicate whether the you in a and b, and the
addressee in c and d, is more likely kiistówa (singular) or kiistówaawa (plural):
4. Translate the following into English. (For verb endings, see section E of this
chapter. For verb stems, see section B and exercise 1.) Note: Translate verbs that
do not have the durative prefix á- as past tense in this exercise.
a. nitáyo’kaahpinnaana
b. kitá’po’takihpoaawa
c. kitsipásskaahpoaawa
d. nitsínihkihpinnaana
e. áyo’kaayaawa
f. iitsiníkio’pa
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
CHAPTER 4
A. AGREEMENT
In the present tense, an English verb with a third person singular subject must
have the suffix -s. If it is missing when there is a third person singular subject as in
(b), a native speaker of English rejects the sentence as ungrammatical (incorrect).
And if the -s is added to a verb when the subject is not third person singular, as in
(a) and (c), the resultant sentence is equally bad.
Requirements of this kind are termed agreement. Blackfoot has extensive
agreement requirements. The person affixes seen on verbs in the previous chapter
must, of course, agree with whatever noun is subject. For example, consider (d),
shown with a morpheme-by-morpheme analysis:2
(d) Ííksspitaawa nohkówa. ‘My son is tall.’
iik-sspitaa-wa n-ohkó-wa
very-tall-sg my-son-3s
Here the verb has third person singular suffix -wa, in agreement with the major
third person singular noun as subject. If the subject were plural, requiring a
different suffix on the noun, a plural suffix would be required on the verb also, as
in (e):
1
An asterisk marks an ungrammatical sentence.
2
Unlike English, Blackfoot doesn’t require the subject of a sentence to precede the verb.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
24 Blackfoot Grammar
Similarly, if the subject is minor third person (4), still other suffixes are required
on the verb:
(f) Ííksspitaayini ohkóyi. ‘His son is tall.’
iik-sspitaa-yini ohkó-yI
very-tall-4s his:son-4s
in which the verb has person prefix nit-, we can say that nit- agrees with the
subject ‘speaker,’ even though there is no actual separate word as subject.
If a speaker’s or addressee’s involvement is to be emphasized, then independent
pronouns may be used, as in the next two examples:
In such cases we can simply say that emphasis of this type is expressed by using
an actual word to refer to the abstract speaker or addressee as subject. (The full set
of such independent pronouns will be presented in section G of chapter 14.) The
required agreement between the pronoun and the verb is already taken care of by
our general statements for other nouns as subject.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
Chapter 4: More on Intransitive Verbs 25
Here is a chart of intransitive verb agreement affixes, all of which have been
exemplified above. The following abbreviations are used from this point on: 1 =
first person (speaker); 2 = second person (addressee); 3 = major third person; 4 =
minor third person; 21 = inclusive ‘we.’
subject no. → singular plural
subject person ↓
1 nit- ‘I’ nit-…-hpinnaan(a)6 ‘we(excl)’
2 kit- ‘yousg’ kit-…-hpoaawa ‘you(pl)’
217 — -o’p(a) ‘we(incl)’
3 -wa ‘he/she’ -yi ‘they’
4 -yini ‘he/she’ -yi ‘they’
3
We can call this the Referring Subject Constraint.
4
The ending on the verb here includes an attached pronoun. These will be explained in chapter 9.
5
So far we have introduced only the person affixes used on verbs found in independent clauses.
Chapter 19 will discuss use of other sets of person affixes for verbs.
6
The final a of -hpinnaana and -o’pa is a predictable addition after an otherwise word-final con-
sonant, rather than part of these morphemes per se.
7
The 21 form is occasionally used for unspecified subject, as, e.g., in itáíhpiyo’pa ‘There’s
dancing going on there.’
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
26 Blackfoot Grammar
Notice that for most of these verbs there are different stem shapes depending on
whether the subject is of animate gender or inanimate gender; e.g., soká’pii ‘good’
is a stem used with inanimate gender subjects, while soká’pssi ‘good’ is used
only with animate gender subjects. (See chapter 7.) There are also stems which
are used exclusively with certain semantic classes; e.g., sikimi ‘black’ is used
only of animals [excluding people]. There are many other such restrictions on
stems of this type which any fluent speaker of Blackfoot will have to know. (The
Dictionary will usually provide such information.)
As we shall see in section F of chapter 18, intransitive verbs derived from nouns
by addition of the suffix -yi are the functional equivalent of so-called ‘predicate
nominatives’ in English. Note the following verbs, the stems of which are derived
from the noun stems beside them:
noun stem verb form gloss
aakíí nítaakiiyihpinnaan ‘We are women.’
(n)ínaa kitáaksinayi ‘You will be chief.’
If the subject of such verbs is third person, the derivational suffix yi is not used in
independent clauses (though it is used in the other paradigms, presented in chapter
19). That the noun stems are here functioning as verb stems is evident in that the
usual verb affixes are used:
noun stem verb form gloss
(n)ínaa áaksinaawa ‘He will be chief.’
aakíí aakííyaawa ‘They are women.’
atsikíN atsikíniaawa ‘They are shoes.’
E. METEOROLOGICAL VERBS
Blackfoot sentences describing weather conditions make use of verbs also. While
semantically such verbs really have no subject, they occur with the third person
singular suffix -wa. Here are several examples:
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
Chapter 4: More on Intransitive Verbs 27
EXERCISES
1. Add the correct verb affixes (recall that subscript4 indicates minor third person):
2. Given the (a) sentences in Blackfoot, translate the (b) sentences into English.
3. Given the (a) sentences, translate the (b) sentences into Blackfoot. (Pay close
attention to the subscripts.)
a. Nitáísínaaki. ‘I write.’
b. __________________. ‘You2p write.’
a. Áókstakiwa nohkówa. ‘My son is reading.’
b. ____________________. ‘My sons are reading.’
a. Á’pistotakiyi nínaiksi. ‘(The) men built.’
b. _________________. ‘We1p built.’
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
CHAPTER 5
A → B / X_Y
t-Affrication
t → ts / _i
In this rule, the i after the blank corresponds to the Y in the rule format. The
preceding environment is irrelevant to the rule, so there is nothing corresponding
to X of the format.
We have already observed the effect of the next two rules. In chapter 2, section
B, we learned that long vowels are shortened before any suffix which starts with
a vowel; e.g., nínaa + iksi → nínaiksi ‘men.’ This is expressed by the following
rule:
Vowel Shortening
Vi: → Vi / _ + V
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
Chapter 5: Some Phonological Rules 29
Here V indicates any vowel, the colon (:) is used to indicate vowel length, and the
plus (+) indicates a morpheme boundary.1 The subscripts on the two V’s indicate
that these two V’s are of the same quality; i.e., only the length of the vowel is
affected by this rule.2
Also in chapter 2, we observed that y and w are lost after consonants; e.g.,
óóhkotok + yi → óóhkotoki ‘rock’ and póós + wa → póósa ‘cat.’ The following
formulates this rule:
Semivowel Loss
G → Ø / C_, where C ≠ ’
In this rule ‘G’ (for ‘glide’) represents semivowels, and ‘Ø’ is the null or ‘zero’
symbol; ‘C’ = consonant. The statement after the rule limits the preceding
environment to consonants other than the glottal stop; i.e., semivowels are
not lost after ’ (as the following examples show: Áwa’yiwa ‘She’s pointing.’;
Káta’yimmíwaatsiksi? ‘Did she laugh?’).
The need for the next two rules will be seen when we form plurals of verb
stems ending in si. Observe the following:
Based on what we have seen in earlier chapters (see chart in section B of chapter
4), we would have expected the latter two forms to be made up of the following
parts:
But in (b), the sequence si + h is realized as ss, according to the following rule:
Postsibilation
And in (c), the sequence si + o is realized as so, according to the next rule:
1
This is necessary to permit the existence of long vowels before short vowels within a morpheme;
i.e., we want the rule to apply only when two morphemes are combined.
2
A more elegant formulation of the rule is possible if vowel length is represented as a feature of
vowels: V → [-long] / _+V
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
30 Blackfoot Grammar
i-Absorption
Note that according to the condition on the rule the i is not ‘absorbed’ if the
following vowel is i or I.3
The effects of the next phonological rule to be introduced are seen by comparing
the following forms:
Given (d), we would expect (e) to have the form áak+ahkayi+o’pa. The loss of the
vowel i is due to the following rule:4
i-Loss
In chapter 2 the singular and plural of ponoká ‘elk’ were given as ponokáwa and
ponokáíksi, respectively. The stem has an inherent accent on its third vowel, as
seen in the singular. We observed that in the plural, the third syllable is accented
throughout; i.e., the accent of the á spreads to the i of the suffix. We called this
Accent Spread. We saw that it applies not only for the vowel combinations a + i
and a + o, which are generally pronounced as single sounds (see the section on
diphthongs in chapter 1), but also of o + i, i + i, a + a, and o + o. For example,
the inherent accent of kakkóó ‘dove’ spreads to the vowel of the plural suffix
in kakkóíksi. Similarly, the plural of mo’tsíS ‘hand’ is mo’tsíístsi. The same
phenomenon is observed in the combination of the durative prefix á with any verb
stem which begins with a vowel. For example, see (a)–(c) above; notice that the
accent of the á has spread to the o of the stem. Here is a formulation of the rule:
Accent Spread
V → [+accent] / V + _
[+accent]
That is, a vowel at the start of a morpheme is accented if the preceding vowel is
accented.
See chapter 6, section B, regarding the I (called ‘breaking I’) mentioned in this and the next rule.
3
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
Chapter 5: Some Phonological Rules 31
RULE INTERACTION
Before closing this chapter, it is important to point out that there can be interaction
between rules, such that the required environment for one rule can exist as the
result of another rule; this is known as a feeding relation between rules. For
example, the s which results from t-Affrication (t-A) can serve as the environment
for Postsibilation (P-s):
t-A P-s
(f) nit + ihpiyi → nitsihpiyi → nítsspiyi ‘I danced.’
When the application of one rule prevents another rule from applying, this is
referred to as a bleeding relation between rules. In general, we assume that rules
interact such that there is minimal bleeding, and exceptions must be stated. (In
chapter 14 (section B, fn. 5) we will see examples in which the very nature of
pairs of rules precludes the application of both rules; consequently, which rule
bleeds the other must be stated.)
Supplemental Material
The reader may have noted that i-Absorption and i-Loss are very similar. Yet as they stand they
cannot be combined into a single rule, for i-Loss requires a preceding vowel and i-Absorption
does not. However, the major purpose of the requirement that the y in i-Loss be preceded by a
vowel is to assure that when the sequence yiV follows a consonant, as in miin + yi + aawa ‘they
are berries,’ the y is lost by Semivowel Loss, and the i remains. If the applicational precedence of
Semivowel Loss were otherwise assured (by a statement that Semivowel Loss bleeds i-Loss), then
i-Loss could be stated without requiring the presence of a vowel before the y. This would allow
collapsing of i-Loss and i-Absorption into one rule, call it i-Drop: i → Ø / {y,s}_V, where V ≠ i or I.
However, this course of action is not attractive, because y and s do not form a natural class, and
the two rules, i-Absorption and i-Loss, seem to describe separate phenomena. The latter is evident
in the case of speakers for whom i-Loss, but not i-Absorption, is accompanied by lengthening of
a preceding i; see footnote 4. So i-Absorption and i-Loss are kept as separate rules in this work.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
32 Blackfoot Grammar
EXERCISES
1. The stem for ‘sleep’ is yo’kaa. (See exercise 2 of chapter 4.) When the prefix á
(to be discussed in chapter 6) is added, the result is the ‘durative’ stem, which
usually translates as ‘be sleeping.’ How would ‘we21 are sleeping’ (durative) be
written? What phonological rule applies?
4. Given: áó’tsisiiwa ‘she smokes (tobacco).’ How would ‘we21 are smoking’ be
written? Besides Accent Spread, two phonological rules apply, and in a certain
order. What are they? (Remember that double vowels represent long vowels.)
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
CHAPTER 6
To begin this chapter, we will discuss the definitions of the terms ‘tense’ and
‘aspect,’ using examples from English even though tense and aspect categories of
Blackfoot do not find an exact match in English.
Tense can be described roughly as an indication of the time of an event or
process relative to the time of the utterance of the sentence in which tense is
indicated. For example, in the sentence Bill ran to the store, the past tense of the
verb run indicates that Bill’s running took place prior to the time at which the
speaker is uttering the sentence. Similarly, in Bill will run to the store, the use of
the auxiliary verb will indicates that the speaker expects the event to take place
subsequent to the time at which the sentence is uttered, i.e., in the future. Aspect,
on the other hand, involves indication of the degree of completion of an event or
process at the time of the utterance or relative to some specified reference point
in time.1
Aspect in English is indicated in combination with tense. For example, in Bill
is running, the use of the auxiliary verb be plus the suffix ing on run indicates
that Bill’s running is going on (uncompleted) at the time of the utterance. The
fact that this continuous aspect is relative to the time of the utterance is signaled
by the use of a present tense form (is) of the verb be. This becomes evident when
we compare the following sentence with a past tense form of the verb be: Bill
was running when I saw him yesterday; notice that here the continuous aspect is
described relative to the point in time when the event was observed.
In Blackfoot, tense and aspect are indicated by prefixes which are part of
verb stems. That is, they combine with simpler stems to form complex stems.
Consequently, tense or aspect prefixes never precede person agreement prefixes.
1
Discussion of tense and aspect requires division of verbs into at least three types: those which
describe processes, those which describe events (processes which naturally or conventionally reach
an end point), and those which describe states. Discussion in this chapter will be limited primarily to
indication of tense and aspect on process and eventive verbs.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
34 Blackfoot Grammar
B. FUTURE TENSE
The s following the future prefix in (c) requires some discussion. The initial
vowel of stem ipii ‘enter,’ unlike the initial vowel of itsiniki ‘tell a story,’ always
causes a preceding k to be replaced by the affricate ks.4 We will speak of this
phenomenon as breaking of k, and of the i which is involved as a breaking i. For
any morpheme which begins with i we need to know whether that i is a breaking
i or not; if it is a breaking i, then if it immediately follows a morpheme ending in
k we know that the k will be replaced by ks.5 To distinguish between a breaking i
and a non-breaking i in this book, we will represent the former with a capital I and
the latter with i. In a listing of the stems for ‘enter’ and ‘tell a story,’ the former
would begin with I as it does in the morpheme-by-morpheme representation in
(c) above. And to the phonological rules presented thus far we add the following:
2
Because of Semivowel Loss (introduced in the preceding chapter, and revised in chapter 14) the
y of this morpheme will show up only after a morpheme which ends in a vowel (as in (r) below) or
glottal stop.
3
From this point on, where it seems useful, an interlinear, morpheme-by-morpheme analysis of
examples will be included, even though in some cases that analysis will involve grammatical devices
which are not discussed until later.
4
Remember that in the Blackfoot alphabet, ks is a digraph representing the complex phoneme
/ks/ (see chapter 1).
5
For this reason, nearly every morpheme listed in the Dictionary which begins with i is accom-
panied by a diagnostic example in which the i in question is preceded by a morpheme ending in k.
There are other ways in which a breaking i affects its environment differently from a non-break-
ing i. See Phonological Rules 2 and 3 in Appendix B.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
Chapter 6: Tense and Aspect 35
Breaking
k → ks / _I
The representation which involves I versus i is more abstract than the usual
spelling system for Blackfoot; in the latter, both I and i are represented by i
because they are realized (pronounced) as the same sound. In addition to the rule
of Breaking, we need a rule which indicates that the difference between these two
vowels is neutralized at the level of pronunciation:
Neutralization
I→i
In addition to future prefix yáak, there is a related prefix áyaak ‘imminent future’
([Link]):6
(d) Nitáyaakihpiyi. ‘I’m about to dance.’
nit-áyaak-ihpiyi
[Link]-dance
C. DURATIVE ASPECT
6
It is conceivable that this is a combination of the durative prefix (see below) and the future prefix,
but since not all speakers distinguish yáak- and áyaak-, such an analysis is difficult to defend.
7
See section B of chapter 15 regarding the vowel a:.
8
Dunham (2007, 2008) points out that because this prefix can describe both continuous and habit-
ual aspect, it more closely fits what is generally described as ‘imperfective’ in aspect studies.
9
See chapter 9 regarding PRO.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
36 Blackfoot Grammar
Prefixes which end in a form diphthongs10 with a following i or o, and the inherent
accent of the durative prefix is realized on the diphthong; but since the diphthongs
are spelled as a sequence of two vowels, the accent is indicated on both, as seen in
(h) and (i). The rule of Accent Spread (chapter 5) accounts for this.
(h) Omá síípisttoowa áípottaawa. ‘The owl is flying.’
om-wa síípisttoo-wa á-Ipottaa-wa
that-3s owl-3s dur-fly-3s
For verb stems which begin with the prefix a’p ‘around, about,’ the durative prefix
is placed after the a’p.11
(j) Nitá’pao’taki. ‘I work.’
nit-a’p-a-o’taki
1-PREF-dur-work
Supplemental Material
Though it is not transcribed as such in this book, the vowel of the durative is probably long when in
10
See chapter 1.
11
The combination of a’p with other stems often is a ‘frozen’ form which is not currently
recognized as a combination of morphemes. E.g. a’po’taki ‘work,’ seen in (j), is analyzable as a’p +
o’taki ‘take,’ but the meaning of the combination is not predictable from the meanings of the parts. In
such cases a’p will be glossed simply ‘PREF’ and the remainder of the stem will be glossed with the
meaning of the combination.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
Chapter 6: Tense and Aspect 37
the first syllable of a word, when preceded only by a person agreement prefix, or preceded by the
vowel i; see the discussion of ‘variable length’ vowels in chapter 15. The apparent inherent accent
of this morpheme in the same positions might then be the result of its underlying length, because
accent assignment rules, though poorly understood, are clearly sensitive to syllable structure,
including length of vowels.
Also, this morpheme apparently begins with y when preceded by a morpheme which ends in a
glottal stop; see example (j) of chapter 21, section A.
D. PERFECTIVE ASPECT
Indication that an event is completed, or that a process has terminated before the
present or other specified reference point in time,12 is indicated by means of prefix
ákaa, as seen in the following:
(l) Anníksi aakííkoaiksi ákaayo’kaayaawa. ‘Those girls have slept.’
ann-iksi aakííkoaN-iksi ákaa-yo’kaa-yi-aawa
that-an.p girl-an.p perf-sleep-pl-PRO
The perfective prefix has the form shown above only when at the beginning of
a word. If preceded by another prefix, it has the variant form Ikáá-, as seen in
(n)–(p);
(n) Anná saahkómaapiiwa máátsikáíhpiyiwa. ‘The boy hasn’t danced.’
ann-wa saahkómaapii-wa máát-Ikáá-ihpiyi-wa
that-3s boy-3s neg-perf-dance-3s
12
With verbs describing states, the perfective indicates that the subject is fully in the state
described; i.e., it can be understood as completion of an inchoative process.
13
The stem for ‘build’ here also has the durative prefix, possibly to indicate it is the building
process which is completed. In testing such combinations, I find that if I remove the durative from
a verb such as that in (m), the hearer consistently interprets the combination (ákaa + a’p) as the
future (áak + a’p). Interestingly, if either the non-initial or the past form of the perfective is used,
eliminating the similarity to the future forms, then the durative is not needed: nikáá’pistotaki ‘I built
(something).’; ííka’pistotakiwa ‘He built (something).’
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
38 Blackfoot Grammar
The last two examples require discussion. Based on what has been presented thus
far, the reader should be wondering why (o) and (p) do not begin with nit and
kit. Simply stated, certain morphemes select a short form of preceding person
agreement prefixes nit-, kit-, and ot-;14 the corresponding short variants are n-, k-,
and w-. One must learn which morphemes, like Ikáá, select the short forms of
these agreement prefixes. Also, since the non-initial form of the perfective prefix
is shown to start with breaking I, we need to account for the fact that the second
person prefix k is not ‘broken’ in (p). It turns out that the k of the second person
prefix is always impervious to Breaking.
The perfective prefix may be used with the future tense prefix, as seen in (q)
and (r); note that the relative order of these prefixes is significant:
(q) Apinákosi. áaksikáóka’pihtsiiyiwa. ‘Tomorrow it will have spoiled.’
apinákosi yáak-Ikáá-oka’pihtsiiyi-wa
tomorrow fut-perf-spoil(II)-sg
The use of the perfective in examples (r) and (s) indicate that the combination of
perf + fut can reflect certainty of the speaker.
14
The third person prefix ot will be seen in later chapters.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
Chapter 6: Tense and Aspect 39
It is not clear that the phenomenon discussed here should be labeled a tense, let
alone ‘past’ tense. As will be seen, in some cases it is actually the absence of
any aspect morpheme. However, I will speak about this phenomenon as ‘past
tense,’ because it generally is observed in sentences which translate as past tense
in English.15
This is the most complicated part of discussion of tense and aspect because
it involves the area of greatest irregularity in Blackfoot: morpheme-initial
variation. Consequently, the presentation here will be incomplete and somewhat
oversimplified. (Morpheme-initial variation will be discussed more fully in
chapter 15.)
Past tense is realized in several variant forms, depending upon the following
factors: the presence vs absence of an agreement prefix, properties of the first
morpheme of the stem, and, when competing forms exist, preference or dialect
of the speaker.
Past tense may be realized as any of the following (examples will follow as
(t)–(z´)):
1. Simple absence of both the durative aspect and future prefixes, often with
placement of accent on a syllable that otherwise would not be accented;16
3. For a small subset of stems beginning with sV or ICV (where C and V stand
for any consonant and vowel), replacement of this initial sequence by sayV
or CayV, respectively; this is possible only in word-initial position, i.e.,
15
If the intended audience were primarily linguists, I might use a term such as ‘preterite,’ but I
think the label ‘past tense’ serves well so long as it is clear that I am not using the term in a technical
sense.
Greg Thomson (personal communication) claims that the absence of the imperfective prefix
(called ‘durative’ in this grammar) with dynamic verbs constitutes a zero morpheme signifying perfec-
tive. Given his analysis and terminology, what is labeled as ‘perfective’ in this grammar would better
be labeled ‘completive.’
Note that the ‘durative’ and perfective aspect prefixes are not mutually exclusive:
áíkaitayoohkimaawa ‘She would already be waiting there.’
á-Ikaa-it-a-yoohkimaa-wa
dur-perf-there-dur-wait-3s
Note also that more than one durative prefix may be used, each one having scope over the
remainder of the stem.
16
It is not yet clear whether the accent placement in such cases is a function of the past tense
itself, or a consequence of the absence of any prefix with inherent accent.
17
This means of marking past tense is never used with stems beginning with a’p or w.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
40 Blackfoot Grammar
when no prefix precedes the stem. We will refer to this process as initial
change. (Initial change is also found in some imperative forms and a few
nominalized verbs.)18
4. In the Siksika Reserve dialect only, there is a fourth way of marking past
tense on stems, but only in word-initial position (and hence cannot be used
if there is a person prefix): Add prefix ná.19 This seems to function as a
variant of (1) in cases where no person prefix is called for.20
For most verbs, more than one of these ‘past tense’ realizations is acceptable on
some forms from the agreement paradigm.
Here are examples of various past tense forms, identified in square brackets as
to whether they illustrate type 1, 2, 3, or 4. Notice that for many verbs there are
two or three acceptable forms which translate as past tense:
(x) Amo aakííwa iihpómmaawa [2] ónnikii. ‘This woman bought milk.’
The past tense morpheme is usually realized on the first syllable of the verb after
the agreement prefix, if any. If it appears with perfective aspect, the perfective
prefix is affected:
18
Some of the cases of initial ii described in (2) are apparently also cognate with the process
known as initial change in other Algonquian languages (see Taylor 1967), but in this description we
will reserve the term for the process described in (3).
19
None of the speakers at Siksika with whom I conversed or worked from 1961 to 1977 ever used
this means of marking past tense with verbs beginning with a’p. However, some speakers now do,
according to data reported by other linguists.
20
Many years ago, Greg Thomson pointed out (personal communication) the practical function
of na- ; it allows speakers to avoid the area of greatest irregularity in Blackfoot verbs: word-initial
allomorphy (see section A of chapter 15).
Speakers with whom I worked in the 1960s considered the use of na- to be ‘slang,’ a term they
commonly applied to emerging grammatical phenomena and lexical innovation. This explains why it
never occurs in textual material elicited at that time.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
Chapter 6: Tense and Aspect 41
Notice also that the non-initial variant of the perfective prefix is used, suggesting
that at least with regard to variant selection, the past tense morpheme is a prefix.
This can also account for the fact that although the perfective prefix otherwise
selects the short form of the person agreement prefixes, the past tense does not;
hence ‘past’ plus ‘perfective’ selects the long form:
EXERCISES
Note: All verb stems and noun phrases needed for the following exercises can be
found in the current chapter.
[Link] the following into Blackfoot, using the future tense morphemes:
(c) I will build a house. [Note: Prefix a’p ‘around, about’ is part of the stem for
‘build/make.’ See example (m) above.]
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
CHAPTER 7
A. SYNTAX
Constraints on the way words combine into larger constructions such as phrases,
clauses, and sentences, are referred to as syntactic constraints or rules of syntax.
Such rules describe requirements which must be met when words are combined,
such as their grammatical class, morphological makeup, and their relative order.
We have already seen in chapter 4 that verbs must agree with their subjects;
this is an example of a morphosyntactic constraint, for it restricts what the
morphological makeup of the verb can be, based on the nominal (noun or noun
phrase) as its subject.
Although there will be no chapter specifically devoted to syntax in this book,
and the word syntax will not appear often, rules of syntax will be met in just about
every chapter. The remainder of this chapter deals with three syntactic topics.
In chapter 4, section C, we saw that Blackfoot intransitive verb stems which take
animate gender subjects usually have different shapes than stems which take
inanimate gender subjects. The examples are repeated here:
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
Chapter 7: Four Verb Stem Types 43
gender, and are referred to as Transitive Animate (TA) and Transitive Inanimate
(TI).1 The selection of verb stem type according to gender of the subject or object
is often referred to as stem agreement. From this point on, we will use this term
when referring to choice of verb stem. (The phrase verb agreement will then
refer to inflectional agreement, as elaborated in the following section.)
In summary, the two parameters of verb subcategorization, namely transitivity
and gender, combine to produce four stem types:
Animate Inanimate
Intransitive AI II
Transitive TA TI
In the Dictionary, the four types of verb stems are labeled as vai, vii, vta, and vti.
For example, compare the four stems which translate ‘burst’:
C. INFLECTIONAL AGREEMENT
1
All transitive verbs of Blackfoot require subjects, the referents for which must be capable of
acting intentionally. Consequently, transitive verbs are not subcategorized in terms of gender of their
subject, since such referents automatically belong to the animate gender class. We will see in chapters
8 (last section) and 12 (section D) how Blackfoot expresses things like ‘A shoe broke the glass’ and
‘The stick hit me.’
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
44 Blackfoot Grammar
The verbs in these examples are transitive inanimate (TI). The full set of agreement
forms for TI verbs in independent clauses will be given in the next chapter. The
agreement forms for transitive animate (TA) verbs in independent clauses will be
presented in chapters 10, 11, and 12.
Objects with which verbs do not agree will be referred to as secondary objects.
Supplemental Material
We have seen that there are two criteria for determining the transitivity of verbs in Blackfoot:
syntactic and morphological. Syntactic transitivity is the ability to occur with an object, while
morphological transitivity is the ability to show inflectional agreement with an object. Where these
two criteria conflict, we will use the prefix para- to modify the syntactic category of the verb. AI
verbs which may occur with a non-particular object will be referred to as paratransitive, because
they may occur with objects but do not agree with those objects.
There are also two types of TA verbs. Some TA verbs may occur with two syntactic objects, but
the verb will show inflectional agreement with only one of them, which we will call the primary
object Such verbs can then be referred to as paraditransitive verbs, because although they are
syntactically ditransitive (take two objects), they are inflectionally (mono)transitive, since they
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
Chapter 7: Four Verb Stem Types 45
show inflectional agreement with only the primary object. The other object, which we will call the
secondary object, may be either particular or non-particular in reference. We will have reason to
make use of these new terms, paratransitive and paraditransitive, in chapter 20.
EXERCISE
If one were translating the following sentences into Blackfoot, would the
Blackfoot verb stem required be II, AI, TI, or TA? (If you are uncertain about the
grammatical gender of the nouns involved, see chapter 2.)
1. I’m working.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
CHAPTER 8
To this point, we have illustrated primarily intransitive verbs. Here are some
examples of a transitive verb, specifically one which occurs with inanimate
gender primary objects:
(a) Ikóónima nohkówa ómi niitóyisi. ‘My son took down that tipi.’
(b) Ikóónimi kohkóíksi ánni nitsiksíkkokóówayi.
‘Your sons took my tent down.’
The first word in each of these sentences is a transitive inanimate (TI) verb. Notice
that the verb of (a) ends in a, which is from wa, with the w removed by the (by
now familiar) rule Semivowel Loss. The verb of (b) ends in i, from yi. The two
suffixes agree with the person and number of the subjects: ‘3s’ in (a), and ‘3p’ in
(b).
A complete set of agreement forms for a verb is called a paradigm. Observe
the following paradigm for the TI verb stem ikooni ‘take down (gently).’ It is
divided here into two portions; the first is used with a singular object and the
second with a plural object.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
Chapter 8: Transitive Inanimate Verbs 47
There are several noteworthy aspects of this paradigm. First, as will be even more
obvious when the affixes of this paradigm are listed separately below, there is
a great deal of similarity between this paradigm and the AI paradigm given in
section B of chapter 4. Second, comparing the singular object forms with the
plural object forms, we see that if the subject is 3 or 4 the two sets of forms are
the same (i.e., number of the object is not indicated in the verb) whereas forms
with other subjects end in a (from -wa) if the object is singular and with i (from
-yi) if the object is plural. Third, the forms with 3 or 4 as subject form a subset in
another regard, as well; they have im where the others have iihp. This is true for
all TI verbs, though many have oom and oohp in place of im and iihp.1 Because all
TI verbs show this hp ~ m2 variation in the independent paradigm, we will refer to
this portion as a TI theme suffix. All speakers find ’p in place of hp to be perfectly
acceptable in this paradigm.
Here are more sentences utilizing forms from the above paradigm:
1
TI stems are listed in the Dictionary as ending in i, ii, or oo. The length of the vowel is relevant
in other than the independent paradigm.
2
For a great many speakers, this is hp ~ mm. So, for example, the verb of (a) above will frequently
be heard as ikóónimma.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
Blackfoot Grammar
4. Semivowel Loss eliminates the w and y of the 3 and 4 forms;5 see chapter 5.
5. To these affixes are added -wa if the object is singular or -yi if the object is
plural, unless the subject is 3 or 4; in the latter cases number of the object is
not indicated in the verb due to the following general constraints of Blackfoot:
Verbs can show agreement with only one third person nominal, and animate
gender takes precedence over inanimate gender when there is a choice.
3
The 21 form is also used for unspecified subject, as seen in the second translation of (c) above,
which can be more literally translated ‘Unspecified took those tents down.’
4
Though there are a few apparent exceptions in the Dictionary; e.g., TI verbs ohpattsii ‘collide
with bodily’ and sta’toksii ‘split (wood)’; note áakssta’toksiimáyi ‘He will split it.’
5
Those semivowels are included in the chart so that the similarity between the TI and AI
paradigms will be more evident.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
49
A more literal translation of (g) is ‘By means of the knife, the branches were cut
off.’
EXErCISES
1. Comparing the chart of TI affixes above with that in section B of chapter 4, list
the ways in which the TI paradigm differs from the AI paradigm.
2. Add the correct TI affixes to the verbs in the following sentences. (The verb
stem is in first position in each sentence given, except for (j), where it is in
second position.)
6
Unless in a context in which the knife is personified, in which case the volitional requirement
can be met.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
50 Blackfoot Grammar
i. iini kookóówayi.
‘We1p saw your house.’
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
CHAPTER 9
Attached Pronouns
Certain third person suffixes appear to have a longer form than those listed in the
charts given so far. For example, the charts list -yi as ‘3p,’ yet at the end of section
A of chapter 4 the following example was given; note the highlighted portion:
But if the subject saahkómaapiiksi is placed after the verb rather than before it, we
see the suffix –yi on the verb:
Only the form with yaawa is acceptable if there is no overt noun or noun phrase
as subject in the clause:
It seems that the ‘long’ form is required if a noun with which it agrees does not
follow the verb. This suggests an analysis in which the longer form of the 3p
ending involves a third person pronoun aawa which attaches to the end of the
verb,1 immediately after the suffix -yi. (The i of -yi is lost in (a) and (c) according
to the rule called i-Loss; see chapter 5.)
The above example involved a pronoun as subject of an AI verb; here is an
example of the pronoun aawa as object of a TI verb:
(d) Nitohpómmatoo’piaawa. ‘I bought them.’
nit-ohpommatoo-’p-yi-aawa
1-buy(TI)-theme-pl-PRO
1
Such pronouns are commonly known as enclitic pronouns.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
52 Blackfoot Grammar
Note that because the plural (pl) suffix -yi in (d) follows a consonant, i-Loss does
not apply; Semivowel Loss applies and the i of -yi shows up.
There is also an attached pronoun for third person singular, but it is used
only when there is another third person in the immediate context, though not
necessarily in the same sentence. We will refer to this pronoun as the Distinct
Third Person (DTP) pronoun. Here are some examples:
(e) Nohkówa áakohpommatoomáyi.
n-ohkó-wa yáak-ohpommatoo-m-wa-áyi
1-son-3s fut-buy(TI)-theme-3s-PRO
‘My son will buy it.’
The pronoun in these examples is evidently áyi, and if the segment preceding this
pronoun is a vowel, that vowel is deleted.
There are plural DTP pronouns as well; one for animate gender nominals and
the other for inanimate gender nominals; these are aiksi and aistsi, respectively.
These require deletion of a preceding a (as in (h) and (l)), and also require deletion
of a preceding i if it in turn is preceded by m or n (as in (k)). Here are several
examples:
(h) Nohkówa áakohpommatoomaistsi.
n-ohkó-wa yáak-ohpommatoo-m-wa-aistsi
1-son-3s fut-buy(TI)-theme-3s-PRO
‘My son will buy them.’
2
‘in.s’ in morpheme-by-morpheme glosses abbreviates ‘inanimate singular.’
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
Chapter 9: Attached Pronouns 53
Attached pronouns can bear grammatical relations other than subject or object.
Here are examples as destinational Goal, Instrument, and Location:3
(m) Nitákkawa itápsskonakiwaiksi.
n-itákka-wa itap-sskonaki-wa-aiksi
1-friend-3s toward-shoot-3s-PRO
‘My friend shot at them (anim).’
3
See section D.4 of chapter 16 for discussion of how these relations are indicated in Blackfoot.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
54 Blackfoot Grammar
Two pronouns may be attached to a verb, but the two must be different. The
constraints involved in such cases are fairly complex,4 but the following rules
cover most circumstances:
1. At least one of the two pronouns must reference the subject or primary
object.
2. If one of two pronouns is subject or primary object and the other is not
subject or primary object, the pronoun as subject or primary object is
closest to the stem.
3. If one pronoun is major third person (3) and the other is minor third person
(4), the 3 pronoun precedes the 4 pronoun (no matter which is subject).
4. The two pronouns must not be identical. In cases where two identical
pronouns are called for, only one will be present.
SUMMARY
If a nominal bearing a grammatical relation in a clause does not follow the verb
of that clause, and that nominal is not major third person singular, then a pronoun
4
See Fox and Frantz (1979) for details.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
Chapter 9: Attached Pronouns 55
must take its place after the verb and be attached to the verb.5 There are two kinds
of third person pronouns which are necessarily attached to verbs: the non-DTP
plural pronoun aawa and the three DTP pronouns listed below. The DTP pronouns
require deletion of a preceding vowel in certain cases.
Supplemental Material
There are what could be called non-affirmative pronouns as well. These will be discussed briefly in
chapter 21. For now, we simply list them as atsiksi ‘3s/in.s,’ aiksaawa ‘3p/4p,’ and aistsaawa ‘ip.’
5
There are examples in section D.3 of chapter 20 in which DTP pronouns are attached to
nominalized verbs.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
CHAPTER 10
A. INTRODUCTION
As explained in chapter 7, a TA verb agrees with its subject and with its animate
gender primary object. The large number of person and number combinations of
subject and primary object results in an extensive paradigm of forms, but most of
these include affixes which we have already encountered above. In this chapter
we look at a relatively straightforward portion of the TA paradigm; later we will
build upon this in chapters 11 and 12. The entire TA paradigm is presented in
chart form in Appendix A.
Comparing (a)–(f) and noting the highlighted affixes, it seems there is nothing
new to learn in this portion of the TA paradigm, for these same affixes are used in
the AI and TI paradigms. But when these forms are compared to the remainder of
the paradigm, especially in chapters 11 and 12, we will see that more is involved
here than simply adding prefixes which agree with the subject and suffixes which
agree with the primary object. In particular, we will see in section E that the
stem for ‘love’ in these examples is ikakomimm,1 and the a which precedes the
highlighted suffixes in (a)–(f) is a morpheme (‘direct’ theme suffix).
1
The verb stem for ‘love’ (wa:komimm), like many verb stems in Blackfoot, seldom is used
without the intensifier prefix ik; consequently, that prefix when used on such verbs is of virtually no
semantic effect.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
Chapter 10: Transitive Animate Direct 57
These sentences show that the TA verb uses suffixes to mark first and second
person plural which are nearly identical to affixes seen earlier (see section B of
chapter 4). They differ in that the pluralizers here lack the hp, which appears on
the 1p and 2p suffixes whenever they are used on a verb which does not also have
a third person as subject or primary object. Other predictable variation in the
verb pluralizer shape is as follows: The 1p suffix is innaan after a consonant, but
usually just nnaan after a vowel. If nothing other than a clitic pronoun is attached,
the 2p suffix is oaawa (see e.g., (b) of chapter 12), but is usually oaa otherwise (as
in (h));2 furthermore, when the 2p suffix is preceded by a vowel, the o is replaced
by w according to a regular phonological rule, which also accounts for i and y
alternations:3
Desyllabification
As was also seen in the TI paradigm of chapter 8, the pluralizers for first and
second person precede suffixes for third person.
The agreement affixes for 21 as subject do double duty in that they are also used
when the speaker does not wish to specify a subject. Observe the following:
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
58 Blackfoot Grammar
Notice that these 21/unspecified subject forms with third person object differ
from the 1s and 2s subject forms (a)–(e) in lacking person prefixes.
Recall that only one animate gender third person may be major third person (3);
any others must be demoted to 4. (See section D of chapter 2.) So if both the
subject and an object of a TA verb are third persons, one must be demoted. Here
we will deal with the case in which a primary object is demoted; i.e., 3 subject
with a 4 object. (4 subject with a 3 primary object will be dealt with in the next
chapter.) This requires a new suffix in place of the a which follows the stem in
(a)–(k).4 It has two forms: -yii and -ii. -yii is used with stems which end in a vowel
other than a, and -ii is used elsewhere. Examples:
(n) Iisínaiiwa nínaawa pookááyi. ‘The man took a picture of the child.’
Such TA forms, i.e., forms for which both subject and primary object are third
person, show number agreement with their subjects but not with their objects.
Compare (o) and (p) with (l). Notice that pluralizing the subject ‘son’ affects the
verb inflection, but pluralizing the object ‘daughter’ does not:
The same suffix -yii ~ ii is used when a minor third person is subject and another
minor third person5 is primary object. In such cases as well, the verbs show
number agreement with their subjects but not with their primary objects. Compare
(q) with (r) and (s):
4
In the next chapter we will refer to these suffixes as ‘direct (dir) theme’ suffixes.
5
Indicated as a 5 in paradigm 3 of Appendix A.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
Chapter 10: Transitive Animate Direct 59
EXERCISE
Add the correct TA agreement affixes to the verbs of the following sentences. (The
verb is the first word in each example.) Be sure to add a theme suffix (either a or
ii ~ yii), as seen in (a)–(p), to the stems given below before adding the agreement
affixes. Alternatively, consult paradigm 3 of Appendix A for the correct theme
suffix and agreement affixes.
1. áísspommo nohkóíksi.
‘You2s help my sons.’
3. itsit saahkómaapiwa.
‘I caught up to the boy.’
4. ohpopaat i’naksípokaiksi.
‘You2p held the babies on your laps.’
5. inakat pokóna.
‘We21 rolled the ball./The ball was rolled.’
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
60 Blackfoot Grammar
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
CHAPTER 11
Given that the verbs of (c) and (d) end in suffixes wa and yi (with the semivowels
lost after a consonant), these sentences differ from their (a) and (b) counterparts
only in that the verb stems of (c) and (d) end in ok, while the verb stems of (a)
and (b) end in a. The portion of verb stems under discussion is referred to as the
theme suffix. The suffix a of (a) and (b) is known as the direct theme suffix (dir),
and the suffix ok of (c) and (d) as the inverse theme suffix (inv). Verbs with first
or second person subject and third person object are direct, while those with third
person subject and first or second person object are inverse.
The ii ~ yii suffix added to stems with 3 as subject and 4 as object (seen in the
preceding chapter) can also be considered a direct theme suffix.
Here are some more sentences containing inverse forms; note that they utilize
the same affixes (highlighted) for person and number that we saw on the direct
verb forms in the previous chapter:
Verbs with minor third person subject and major third person object are inverse
as well:
There are two important things to notice about verbs with this combination
of subject and object. First, these are the only verb forms in any Independent
paradigm which have a prefix that indicates third person, and in which oaa(wa)yi
rather than just yi marks ‘3p.’ Second, although the prefix ot and the inverse
theme suffix are found together only with the 4:3 person combination,1 these
forms have no affixes which agree with the minor third person. They agree only
with the major third person; note that number of ‘daughter’ is not reflected in the
verbs of (k)–(m).
In addition to the theme suffix just discussed, and which we will consider to be
part of the stem of TA verbs, there are three agreement affix positions, which we
will refer to as AGR1, AGR2, and AGR3. AGR1 is a prefix and the other two
are suffixes, with AGR2 preceding AGR3 if both are present. These facts can be
summarized in the following ‘formula’ for the TA verb (TAV):
Here are lists of the AGR affixes arranged in columns under their respective
positions of occurrence:2
AGR1 AGR2 AGR3
-kit- ‘2’ -(i)nnaan ‘1p’ -wa ‘3s’
nit- ‘1’ -oaa(wa) ‘2p’ -yi ‘3p/4p’
ot- ‘3’ -oaa(wa) ‘3p’ -yini ‘4s’
1
There are also forms in the TA independent paradigm that are used when a minor third person
(4) is the primary object and the subject is another minor third person (5) which is outranked by the
object. These also use the prefix ot, and differ from the forms exemplified in (k)–(m) in that they have
suffix yini. See paradigm 3 of Appendix A.
2
See section C of chapter 10 regarding the parenthesized portions of these affixes.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
Chapter 11: Transitive Animate Inverse 63
No one of the AGR positions must be filled in all TA verbs, but no TA independent
verbs occur without at least one of them containing an affix. Also, only one of
the affixes in a column may occur in any given verb. As we shall see, there are
precedence relations within each set, in the sense that if agreement generalizations
call for more than one affix from a given set, the actually occurring affix is
determined by rule. In the chart above, the affixes in each set are arranged so that
an affix has priority over those below it in the same set.
In all of the examples above, the inverse theme suffix has the shape ok. However
it also takes two other forms in verbs of independent clauses, depending upon the
preceding segment. If the preceding segment is a t, then this t plus the inverse
suffix are together realized as a long kk,3 as illustrated in (n). Compare the direct
form (o):
This latter form of the inverse suffix is called for even if the preceding i is deleted
by i-Absorption, as it is in (q), or by i-Loss, as it is in (r):4
(q) Nitókskoihtsooka. ‘He covered me (with a blanket).’
nit-okskoihtsi-ook-wa
1-cover(TA)-inv-3s
3
This gemination is included as phonological rule 1 in Appendix B.
4
The o of this suffix is one of the variable-length vowels to be discussed in chapter 15, and can
be represented as o: .
5
There are at least two other morphemes which have variants involving o: ~ Ø. When such
morphemes appear in paradigm charts in Appendix A, they are represented as beginning with O.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
64 Blackfoot Grammar
EXERCISE
Add the correct TA agreement affixes to the verbs of the following sentences.
(The verb is the first word in each example.) First, be sure to add the correct
theme suffix (direct or inverse) to the verb stems provided. Alternatively, consult
paradigm 3 of Appendix A for the correct theme suffix and agreement affixes.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
CHAPTER 12
So far, all of the TA forms we have discussed involved third person as either
subject or object. In this chapter we look at TA forms which do not involve an
overt third person as either subject or object.
As the reader might have expected, the same 1p suffix seen in AI verbs is in the
AGR2 position. But notice that the English translation indicates that this form will
also be used if both first and second person are plural. This shows us that 1p has
1
See section C of chapter 11.
The final a in (c), like the final a mentioned in footnote 6 of chapter 4, is present only to prevent
2
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
66 Blackfoot Grammar
priority over 2p where the AGR2 position is concerned; the presence of the 1p
suffix makes it impossible to indicate 2p. That is, the obligatory absence of a 2p
suffix in (c) precludes any indication of the number of second person.
The o of the 1 subject with 2 object (1:2) forms is long after stems which end
in i; so it too is one of the variable-length vowels to be discussed in chapter 15. In
the charts of Appendix A this vowel is represented by o:.
Comparing these forms to those in section A, we observe that these have -oki
where (a)-(c) have -o. The ok portion is evidently the inverse theme suffix
introduced in chapter 11;3 the remaining i serves to indicate that the other person
involved is first person.
The presence of the inverse theme suffix in (d)–(f) can be accounted for
by concluding that in the Blackfoot direct vs inverse system, first person
outranks second person. The -o of the 1:2 forms in (a)–(c) must then be seen
to simultaneously serve as a direct theme suffix and as indicator of first person
involvement, as stated in section A. Discussion of the plural suffixes of (a)–(c)
applies without change to (d)–(f).
Sentences (g) and (h) have TA forms which are used when the subject (the ‘lover’
in this case) is unspecified (but assumed to be sentient). They involve the inverse
theme suffix plus an additional oo. As problematic as this oo is for analysis, the
situation is even more complex, as we see when we add the plural forms in (i)–(k):
It has exactly the same variant shapes in the same environments described in chapter 11.
3
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
Chapter 12: Transitive Animate Local Forms 67
In (i) and (j) we see the 1p and 2p suffixes hpinnaan and hpoaawa, as we might
expect, but in place of the inverse theme suffix ok and the suffix oo, we find -ot
+ i. (Postsibilation accounts for the ss; see chapter 5.) And the marking of 21 by
-hpa in (k) is unique in the TA independent paradigm.
Like the o of the inverse suffix -ok, the o of -ot is null after stems which end in
t, as in (l); otherwise it is realized as o:. Compare (i) and (m).
(l) Áyiimattsspa. ‘We21 are being imitated.’
á-yiimat-tsi-hpa
dur-imitate(TA)-inverse-21
4
Some speakers allow a non-volitional stimulus as subject of a TA verb with an experiencer as
object: Nítsskíi’tsooka óómi ataksáaksini. ‘That box frightened me.’ (From Greg Thomson, personal
communication.)
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
68 Blackfoot Grammar
If the object of such a verb is third person, the unspecified subject form (section
D of chapter 10) is the same as the TA form with 21 as subject, so the resultant
sentence is multiply ambiguous:
(o) Anni miistsísi iihtawayákiaawa imitááwa.
ann-yi miistsíS-y iiht-wa:wayáki-a:-wa imitáá-wa
that-in.s knife-3s means-hit(TA)-dir-3s dog-3s
That stick hit the dog.’/‘The dog was hit with that stick.’/
‘We21 hit the dog with that stick.’
EXERCISE
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
CHAPTER 13
Demonstratives
There are five demonstrative stems to which numerous suffixes may be added.
In this chapter we will deal primarily with the basic stems and their inflectional
forms.
Corresponding to each of the five stems given above are what Taylor (1978) calls
‘diminutives’; these are, respectively, amssto, omsst, annssto, annsst, and amsst.1
They are used for referents which the speaker views with pathos or affection:
generally old persons and children.
B. USES
1
The position of an apparent diminutive suffix sst in these stems supports Taylor’s analysis of
demonstratives amo and anno as including a suffix o. However, because of difficulty in assigning a
consistent meaning or function to the latter suffix, I am of the opinion that the present under-analysis
is more practical for the intended audience of these chapters.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
70 Blackfoot Grammar
and anno there are two irregularities: the animate singular suffix is null (as in
(g)), and the initial i of suffixes such as -iksi and -istsi is lost (as in (b)), though
occasionally the initial i of -istsi may be heard after these stems, as in (e) and (j).
(a) Amoyi nítohpommatoo’pa.
amo-yi nit-ohpommatoo-’p-wa
this-in.s 1-buy(TI)-theme-sg
‘I bought this (inan).’
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
Chapter 13: Demonstratives 71
C. ACCENT ON DEMONSTRATIVES
1. Whether or not the demonstrative is being used in the first mention of its
referent in the current discourse.
2. With amo, om, ann, and am, accent on the first syllable may emphasize
the proximity features which distinguish these basic stems. E.g., a speaker
may accent the first syllable of omiksi in order to emphasize the lack of
proximity to the speaker and addressee of its referents (Taylor 1978).
2
‘invs’ in the gloss for (i) abbreviates ‘invisible.’ See section E below regarding the suffix so
glossed.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
72 Blackfoot Grammar
Although accent and length are independent features of vowels elsewhere in the
language, in the demonstrative stems the accented vowel is always lengthened,
except before the long consonant of ann and anno. However, because this length
is automatic in demonstratives, it has not always been indicated in their spelling
here.
There are at least four suffixes which may be attached to inflected demonstratives
(and accompanying nouns). The four are listed here with their central meanings
(and abbreviations for later glosses):3
Examples follow:
(k) Amoma miistsísa áakitohkitopiiyináyi.
amo-ma miistsíS-wa yáak-it-ohkit-opii-yini-áyi
this-stat tree-3s fut-there-upon-sit-4s-PRO
‘He will sit on this tree.’
The meanings for all but the last are from Taylor (1978).
3
This gloss is in need of revision. If motion is involved in the meaning of this suffix, it is not
4
necessarily taking place at the time of the speech act, as example (l) shows, or even at the time of the
process, event, or state being described.
5
According to Greg Thomson (personal communication) the apparent use of this suffix to mark
words referring to entities which are not visible is a consequence of the discourse function of this
suffix, which has to do with saliency.
6
Placing this suffix after the 4s suffix shows that the latter is /yI/ rather than /yi/: ann + yI + hka
→ annísska ‘that one4.’ See phonological rule 3 ‘x-Sibilation’ in Appendix B.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
Chapter 13: Demonstratives 73
nitáaka’páísoksistotsii’pa.
nit-yáak-a’p-á-sok-Istotsi-’p-wa
1-fut-PREF-dur-well-build(TI)-theme-3s
‘When I get home, I’ll fix my house up.’
Demonstratives always precede the nouns which they modify (their Heads), as
seen above in (e)–(j). With rare exceptions,9 the only thing which can separate a
demonstrative from its Head is a nominalized verb10 which also modifies the same
7
‘subj’ abbreviates subjunctive; see chapter 19.
8
The symbol ‘^’ is used to connect multiword glosses of single Blackfoot morphemes.
9
Exceptions I have found, such as the following, all involve possessors:
(i) áámoyihka nínaawa ookówayihka ‘that [man’s house]’
10
The examples provided here will be intransitive verb stems inflected as nouns; such nouns
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
74 Blackfoot Grammar
G. VERBALIZED DEMONSTRATIVES
always reference the underlying subject of the verb. Nominalization processes will be discussed in
chapter 20.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
Chapter 13: Demonstratives 75
EXERCISES
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
CHAPTER 14
Possessives
Possessed nouns are marked for person and number of their possessors, by affixes
which we will call possessive affixes. In addition, and following any possessive
suffixes, are the usual inflectional suffixes expected on nouns and summarized
in section E of chapter 2. Below are some examples, with the possessive affixes
highlighted; observe that they are much like the agreement affixes seen on verbs
in earlier chapters; the major differences are that ‘inclusive our’ (21) is marked
by a combination of the second person prefix (kit ~ k) and a new suffix (i)nnoon,1
a third person possessor calls for a new prefix ot ~ w, and the third person plural
possessive suffix is oaawa. (The full paradigm of possessive affixes will be
presented in section E.)
There are various properties of nouns with regard to possession which can be seen
to subclassify them, including whether possessive inflection is obligatory (i.e.,
whether the noun never occurs without possessive inflection), whether the noun
requires a suffix (i)m before possessive affixes may be added, and in the case of
simplex noun stems, whether it selects the short or long person prefixes.2 We will
divide nouns into three classes with regard to optionality/necessity of possessive
inflection. These are presented in sections A–C.
1
The initial i of this suffix is present after consonants and o. Some speakers replace it by o after
consonants.
2
Another property which most other analysts utilize in classification is whether the noun has an
(apparent) m prefix when no other person prefix is present. But see section D.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
Chapter 14: Possessives 77
Here is the set of possessive forms of ohkáksaakin3 ‘axe,’ arranged by person and
number of the possessor (the possessive affixes are highlighted); note that these
all involve the ‘long’ prefixes nit-, kit-, or ot-:
1s nitohkáksaakina ‘my axe’ 1p nitohkáksaakininnaana ‘our axe’
21 kitohkáksaakininnoona ‘our axe’
2s kitohkáksaakina ‘your axe’ 2p kitohkáksaakinoaawawa ‘your axe’
3s otohkáksaakini ‘his axe’ 3p otohkáksaakinoaawayi ‘their axe’
Nouns marked by the possessive affixes alone are not complete words. Like
other nouns, they must be followed by one of the nominal suffixes described in
chapter 2. All of these forms just listed end in a ‘3s’ or i because ohkáksaakin is
an animate4 gender noun and so the singular has suffix –wa ‘3s’ or –yi ‘4s.’ Were
these referring to more than one axe, they would of course have suffix –iksi ‘an.p’
instead.
As usual, the first morpheme of a stem determines whether the short or long
person prefixes are used; ohkáksaakin ‘axe’ selects the long prefixes and (as
seen in (a)) iksísst ‘mother’ (obligatorily possessed, see below) selects the short
prefixes. Here are additional examples of optionally possessed nouns which select
the long prefixes:
(a)–(d) above are examples with obligatorily possessed stems; these are nouns
which never occur without the possessive affixes.5 In the Dictionary they are
designated as nar and nir. They are inherently relational in that they necessarily
reference two parties: one is the primary referent of the noun stem itself, and the
other, which we will call the relatee, is the party or parties to which the primary
referent bears the expressed relation. For example, the stem inn ‘father’ expresses
a relation between two parties; consequently, it requires reference to the one who
is father as primary referent, and to the one or more relatee(s) (i.e., his offspring)
3
See the next chapter regarding the oh of ‘axe.’
4
Field notes from the 1960s indicate that this noun was inanimate gender, as treated in the first
and second editions of this Grammar. However, more recent elicitation indicates that it has been
reclassified as animate gender, perhaps because contemporary axe heads are all steel.
5
Such stems are sometimes called ‘inalienably possessed.’
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
Blackfoot Grammar
to whom the primary referent is father. Here are some other relational stems, with
indication of primary referent and relatee:
For such relational nouns, the possessive affixes reference the relatee. Most
such stems use the short form of the person agreement prefixes (unless some
other morpheme which calls for the long form is first prefixed to the stem). Here
are examples used in sentences; the possessive affixes are highlighted in the
morpheme glosses:
(i) Kiksísstsinnooniksi áyo’kaayaawa.
k-iksisst-innoon-iksi á-Io’kaa-yi-aawa
2-mother-21-an.p dur-sleep-pl-PRO
‘Our21 mothers are sleeping.’
In (j) we see that a prefix w plus the initial vowel i of the stem are realized as o.
This is the result of the following phonological rule:
Coalescence
w + i(:) → o
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
79
The i in the rule may be either long or short, as the notation i(:) is intended to
indicate.
In (k), the prefix w is not realized in the pronounced form, because a glide
cannot remain at the beginning of words in Blackfoot. This is accounted for by
generalizing Semivowel Loss so that it applies in word-initial position as well as
after consonants:
Example (f) is an obligatorily possessed stem derived from a noun stem which
otherwise cannot take the possessive affixes. Such relational nouns are formed
by addition of -(i)m (glossed ‘poss’ in examples below). This suffix has slightly
different realizations with different stems, and the actual form it takes does not
seem to be completely predictable. It generally has the form -im if the stem to
which the suffix is added ends in a consonant: nitóóhkotokimi ‘my rock’; but
with at least one consonant final stem, the i is inexplicably long: nitohpóósiima
‘my cat.’7 When added to a stem which ends in a short vowel, the suffix either has
the form -im, as seen in nitsisttsiksípokoimi8 ‘my salt,’ or the stem-final vowel is
lengthened and the suffix is -m, as in nitápotskinaama ‘my cow.’ When added to
a stem which ends in a long vowel, the suffix is simply -m.9
These stems utilize the possessive affixes, which agree with the relatee as in
section B above, but in general they use the long form of the person agreement
prefixes (unless some other morpheme which calls for the short form is first
prefixed to the stem). Here are more examples:10
(l) Nitómitaama áóhkiwa. ‘My dog is barking.’
nit-omitaa-m-wa á-ohki-wa
1-dog-poss-3s dur-bark-3s
6
Obviously, this rule does not bleed the rule Coalescence, which was introduced just above.
7
The oh at the beginning of the stem for ‘cat’ is part of the non-initial variant of this stem; see
chapter 15.
8
There is considerable inter-speaker or dialectal variation here.
9
One apparent exception is seen in nitsínaima ‘my boss.’ However, the stem Inaa ‘leader/chief’
has an allomorph with a short a when followed by any derivational suffix.
10
The form of ‘dog’ seen in (l) has the non-initial variant of this stem; see chapter 15.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
80 Blackfoot Grammar
As will be seen in chapter 15, one of the most common variations in the shape
of Blackfoot morphemes is the loss of an initial nasal when preceded by another
morpheme in the same word; in fact, there are very few morphemes in Blackfoot
which retain an initial nasal when not in word-initial position. So when most stems
which begin with nasal-initial morphemes take possessive prefixes, the nasal is
dropped: compare niistsíípisskaani ‘fence’ and kitsistsíípisskaani ‘your fence.’ In
the first form there is an initial n which is part of the stem, but in the second form
with possessive prefix kit, the stem lacks this n. (The first vowel of the stem of
‘fence’ is long only when it is in the first syllable of a word; see chapter 15 for a
brief discussion of such vowel length variation.) Here is an example with initial
m: mí’sohpsskiiwa ‘muskrat,’ nitsí’sohpsskiima ‘my muskrat.’
The majority of Blackfoot stems for body parts have an initial m. As just
described, that m will be present only if no prefix precedes these stems. This gives
rise to paradigms such as the following:11
(n) móókoani ‘stomach’ (o) mo’tsísi ‘hand’
nóókoani ‘my stomach’ no’tsísi ‘my hand’
kóókoani ‘your stomach’ ko’tsísi ‘your hand’
óókoani ‘his stomach’ o’tsísi ‘his hand’12
Such paradigms give the initial m the appearance of a prefix, which has led most
analysts to consider it a marker of unspecified possessor (often called ‘indefinite’
possessor)13 However, any prefix, not just a person prefix, eliminates the initial
m, as seen in (p) and (q). This, plus the fact that several nouns which are not
obligatorily possessed have an initial m only if no prefix precedes the stem (see
the stem for ‘muskrat’ in the preceding paragraph for an example), favors the
analysis presented here.
11
Observe that the third person prefix w, in the words for ‘his stomach’ and ‘his hand,’ results in
absence of the m even though the w itself is eliminated by Semivowel Loss.
12
Forms of o’tsiS ‘hand’ with ‘2p’ or ‘3p’ demonstrate that Desyllabification (of the o in oaawa) is
prevented from applying (i.e., is bled) by i-Absorption, rather than vice versa, or else o’tsówaawaistsi
‘their hands’ would be *o’tsíwaawaistsi from w + o’tsí + oaawa + istsi.
13
See Frantz and Creighton (1982) for discussion and references.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
Chapter 14: Possessives 81
As stated earlier, in addition to the possessive affixes, the possessed noun will
carry the appropriate suffixes for its own gender, person (3 or 4), and number.
(Remember that any animate gender noun possessed by 3 or 4 is necessarily 4.)
Here are possessive paradigms for itán ‘daughter’ and ookóówa ‘dwelling’:
nitána ‘my daughter’ nitáninnaana ‘our1p daughter’
kitáninnoona ‘our21 daughter’
kitána ‘your2s daughter’ kitánoaawawa ‘your2p daughter’
otáni ‘his3 daughter’ otánoaawayi ‘their daughter’
otánayi ‘his4 daughter’ otánoaawayi ‘their daughter’
(cf. ‘daughters’: nitániksi ‘my daughters,’ nitáninnaaniksi ‘our daughters’)
14
The (i) of (i)nnaan and (i)nnoon is not present after stems ending in i, a, w, or y.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
82 Blackfoot Grammar
F. NOUNS AS POSSESSORS
A noun as possessor is positioned before the noun which it modifies, as seen in (t):
The demonstrative omiksi ‘those’ modifies óta’siksi ‘his horses,’ while amo ‘this’
modifies nínna ‘my father.’
Notice that these pronouns seem to have the 3s suffix wa and the 4s suffix yi as
would any animate gender noun. Even the non-third person pronouns will have
the wa suffix replaced by a yi suffix when they are used in clauses involving
15
See chapter 13 on demonstratives.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
Chapter 14: Possessives 83
another animate gender noun, unless the pronoun functions as subject.16 Observe
the following examples:
In (v), the emphatic pronoun niistóyi has the suffix yi, apparently because of the
presence of the third person ‘my son’ as subject. In (w), kiistóyi is an ‘oblique’
argument of the verb, linked by the prefix omoht ‘source/means’ (see section D.4
of chapter 16). The presence of the third person subject ‘my friend’ apparently
requires the suffix yi on the pronoun. Similarly in (x), niistónnaani is linked by
another variant (iiht) of the same prefix in a verb with a third person subject.
EXERCISES
1. Given: Translate:
2. Given the following verb stems: inihki ‘sing’ (AI), okska’si ‘run’ (AI), and
ohkoono ‘find’ (TA). Translate a.–[Link] Blackfoot:
16
The pronoun is not classed as minor third person syntactically, or else the verb in (v), e.g.,
would be iinoyííwa; i.e., inflected as having a minor third person object.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
CHAPTER 15
Allomorphy
A. MORPHEME-INITIAL VARIATION
Initial variation can be grouped into several subtypes. Being aware of the most
common types is very valuable when attempting to find a morpheme in the
Dictionary, for often not all the variants are listed as entries.
Ø ~ I2
A very large group of noun and verb roots which begin with a consonant when in
word-initial position have an allomorph which begins with I if another morpheme
is prefixed.3 Here are some examples:4
pookááwa ‘child’ i’naksípokaawa5 ‘infant’
náámayi ‘bow’ sahksináámayi ‘short bow’
pi’kssííwa ‘bird’ ómahksipi’kssiiwa ‘big bird/turkey’
Píít! ‘Enter!’ Áaksipiimma. ‘She will enter.’
Passkáát! ‘Dance!’ Áípasskaayaawa. ‘They are dancing.’
1
That is, post-lexical phonological rules. Much of the variation seen below would be accounted
for in current theory by lexical phonological rules.
2
The symbol ‘~’ is used to join variants of a single morpheme.
3
The added vowel is sometimes referred to as ‘connective I.’ Note that it is a breaking I.
4
The situation has recently become even more complicated than the grouping presented here.
E.g., for some speakers consulted on the Blood reserve, piitaa ‘eagle’ is Ipiitaa after omahk- ‘big’ but
ohpiitaa after ksikk- ‘white.’
5
See the discussion of Breaking in section A of chapter 6.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
Chapter 15: Allomorphy 85
Supplemental Material
A small subset of such roots loses a vowel after the first consonant, and that consonant assimilates
to the following consonant to produce a long consonant:
Ø ~ oh
Another large group of morphemes which begin with a consonant when in word-
initial position has initial oh when a prefix is added. Here are a few examples:
kiááyowa ‘bear’ sikohkiááyowa ‘black bear’
póósa ‘cat’ ómahkohpoosa ‘big cat’
kitsími ‘doorway’ i’nákohkitsimi ‘small doorway’
Po’kíi(y)óót! ‘Follow!’ Áakohpo’kii(y)oowa. ‘She will follow.’
Kókkit! ‘Give it to me!’ Nítohkokkáyi. ‘He gave it to me.’
pokítapíwa ‘small person’ ííkohpokitapiwa ‘very small person’
These morphemes are also entered in the Dictionary under their consonant-initial
allomorph if they are nouns, but with the oh present otherwise (though some
prefixes are listed under their consonant-initial allomorph).
{m,n} ~ Ø
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
86 Blackfoot Grammar
These morphemes are entered in the Dictionary with the initial nasal present
unless they are verbs, in which case they are listed without the nasal.
Other fairly common alternations include the following:
Unless they are verb stems or roots, such morphemes are listed in the Dictionary
in their word-initial form.6
B. VARIABLE-LENGTH VOWELS
6
A very few stems have an apparent prefix w added before possessive prefixes (chapter 14) are
added. E.g., compare nottoána ‘my knife’ to isttoána ‘knife’ and innísttoana ‘long knife.’ I take the
form of ‘knife’ without a prefix to be IttoáN (see the rule s-Insertion in Appendix B.), and the first o of
nottoána to be the result of Coalescence.
7
Occasionally such a vowel may be heard as short, but only if unaccented; e.g., aaníít ~ aníít ‘say
(something)!’
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
Chapter 15: Allomorphy 87
If the only syllable preceding a variable length vowel is a person prefix (nit-, kit-,
ot-), then the vowel may be either long or short, as in (c). In all other environments,
variable length vowels are short, as in (d) and (e).
The direct theme suffix seen in chapter 10 is a variable length vowel; in (e) it
is short, but in (f) it is long:
Variable length vowels will sometimes be listed as a:, o:, and i:.
C. MORPHEME-FINAL ALLOMORPHY
Irregular variation at the end of morphemes is far less common, but certain
patterns can be identified.
Non-permanent Consonants
The variation seen in chapter 2 at the end of nouns and abbreviated with symbols
M, N, and S is the most frequently encountered. A general statement about the
realization of these abstract segments can be made:
Not only nouns exhibit such variation. There are a few intransitive verbs which
exhibit an mm ~ Ø alternation, and the forms with mm are precisely those with
semivowel-initial suffixes. Here are some examples:
8
It is a bit of a paradox that this allomorphy rule must make reference to the application of a
phonological rule. This can be avoided only by writing the environment for Semivowel Loss into the
rule for vowel length as follows: ‘Such vowels are long if preceded by a semivowel which is itself not
preceded by a consonant other than ’.’
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
88 Blackfoot Grammar
(h) áaksipiimmináyi ‘She4 will enter.’ cf. kitáaksipii ‘You2s will enter.’
áak-IpiiM:-yini-áyi kit-yáak-IpiiM:
fut-enter-4s-PRO 2-fut-enter
This variation may be abbreviated by use of the symbol M:, as has been done in
the morpheme-by-morpheme representation.
In the Dictionary, noun stems are listed with non-permanent consonants
present, while verb stems are listed without the non-permanent mm.
Semivowel Alternation
The alternation is between y and w; i.e., the roots involved, kaay ~ kaaw ‘open’ and
itsiy ~ itsiw ‘good quality,’ end in a semivowel, but the quality of the semivowel
is determined by the initial vowel of the following morpheme.10 If the following
vowel is i or I, then the semivowel is y; otherwise, the semivowel is w.
In the Dictionary, such morphemes are listed as ending with a period (.).
Diphthongization
A number of stems ending in i, ii, or oo replace this i, ii, or oo with the diphthong
ao before the 21 suffix; observe the following:
9
The sequence Ciwa will often sound like Co(w)a. Call this fast speech rule ‘Coalescence 2.’
10
In current terminology, these morphemes end in a glide which is ‘underspecified.’
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
Chapter 15: Allomorphy 89
(l) Itapáóo’pa. ‘We21 went there.’ cf. Itapóówa. ‘He went there.’
(m) Itáópaoo’pa. ‘We21 stay there.’ cf. Itáópiiwa. ‘He stays there.’
(n) Áakomáópaoo’pa.‘We21 will quiet cf. Áakomáópiiyaawa.‘They will quiet
down.’ down.’
(o) Iipiksáóo’pa. ‘We21 hit cf. Iipiksííwa. ‘He hit (s.t.).’
(something).’
This diphthongization is not limited to the suffix -o’p of the independent paradigm.
It also takes place with the 21 suffixes of the Conjunctive and Subjunctive
paradigms; see chapter 19 and Appendix A regarding these paradigms.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
CHAPTER 16
One of the most salient features of Blackfoot is the complexity of its verb stems.
Many morphemes, the closest equivalents of which are separate words in most
other languages, are part of the verb in Blackfoot. These include negatives,
quantifiers, intensifiers, all kinds of adverbials, and many, many others, including
numerous morphemes which would be main or auxiliary verbs in other languages.
In this chapter we will illustrate only a few of the morphemes which can make up
complex stems. We will concentrate on morphemes (most of which are classed
as ‘adjuncts’ [adt] or verb roots [vrt] in the Dictionary) that do not determine
the syntactic category of the stems of which they are a part; morphemes which
do determine the syntactic category of the stems of which they are a part are
discussed in chapters 17 and 18.
A. NEGATION
The negative prefix has five distinct forms; these occur in complementary
distribution, as follows:
máát- ~ Imá:t-
1
Negated verbs of independent clauses generally occur with non-affirmative suffixes, discussed
further in chapter 21. In the examples at hand, the non-affirmative affixes are -waiksaawa ‘3p’ and
-hpa ‘1s/2s.’
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
Chapter 16: Complex Verb Stems, Part 1 91
kátá’- ~ Ikátá’-
Nikátáí’naayihtopi, nitáakssakiaopii.
n-Ikátá’-Inaa-yi-htopi nit-yáak-saki-a-opii
1-neg-chief-be-unreal 1-fut-still-dur-stay
‘Were I not a chief, I’d still be home.’
Glottal Metathesis
’ + V → V’ / _C
miin- ~ piin-5
Used in imperative verb forms if not preceded by any other prefixes. (The
variation between miin- and piin- is totally free.)
Miinasáí’nit./Piinasáí’nit. ‘Don’t cry!’
miin-wa:sai’ni-t
neg-cry-2s(imper)
2
See chapter 19, section D.
3
kátá’- is also used as an interrogative prefix in independent clauses, and as a negative prefix on
nominalized verbs.
4
New abbreviations in this section: ‘conj’ and ‘subj’ indicate affixes from the Conjunctive and
Subjunctive paradigms, respectively (see chapter 19).
5
The vowel of this prefix is not always long.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
92 Blackfoot Grammar
sta’-
Used only when preceded by the non-factive prefixes ááhk and á:k.7
Kitsííksstato kááhksstai’pottaahsi. ‘I want you to not fly.’
kit-iiksstat-o: k-ááhk-sta’-Ipottaa-hsi
2-want(TA)-1:2 2-might-neg-fly-conj
say- ~ saw-
This variant of the verbal negator occurs elsewhere; i.e., in all environments other
than those described above. It exhibits semivowel alternation (see chapter 15);
i.e., it is say- if the following morpheme begins with i or I; elsewhere the prefix
is saw-.
Nitáakito’too sawomáóoyisaawa. ‘I’ll arrive before they eat.’
nit-yáak-it-o’too saw-oma-ooyi-si-aawa
1-fut-then-arrive neg-yet-eat-3(subj)-PRO
EXISTL = existential
6
sta’- is also used as an interrogative prefix, evidently as a non-initial variant of káta’- (see note
7
above regarding káta’-): Áakstao’ohkaaniiwa? ‘Will she say (something)?’ See chapter 20.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
Chapter 16: Complex Verb Stems, Part 1 93
The last five examples point out the need for a phonological rule to account for the
frequent lengthening of morpheme-initial s when preceded by a morpheme which
ends in a consonant other than a glottal stop.8 We will call this s-Connection a
because we need a different rule (s-Connection b) for those cases in which the
preceding morpheme ends in a vowel:
s-Connection a
s → ss / C + _, where C ≠’
The next example, in which onawa is followed by s, illustrates the need for
s-Connection b:
Kítohkottssksiniihpa áísawonawaissikópaoo’ssi.
kit-ohkott-ssksini-hp-wa á-saw-onawa-ssikópao-o’ssi9
2-able-know(TI)-theme-sg dur-neg-ever-rest-21(conj)
‘You should know we21 never rest.’
s-Connection b
8
This lengthening of s after consonants, when it is clearly audible, serves to distinguish t + s and
k + s from the affricates ts and ks.
9
See chapter 15, section C regarding ‘diphthongization’ of the stem ssikópii ‘rest.’
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
94 Blackfoot Grammar
B. QUANTIFIERS
Nitohkanáóhpommatoo’pinnaaniaawa.
nit-ohkana-ohpommatoo-’p-innaan-yi-aawa
1-all-buy(TI)-theme-1p-pl-PRO
‘We all bought them.’/‘We bought all of them.’11
wayák- ‘both/two’
Nitáyákohpommatoo’piaawa. ‘I bought both of them.’
nit-wayák-ohpommatoo-’p-yi-aawa
1-both-buy(TI)-theme-pl-PRO
10
It may be that we are dealing here with two closely related prefixes which differ in form only
in that one ends in an a and the other does not. Compare the first example to the following sentence:
Óómiksi pookáíksi áóhkanawaasai’niyaawa. ‘Those kids all are capable of crying.’
om-iksi pookáá-iksi á-ohkana-wa:sai’ni-yi-aawa
that-an.p child-an.p dur-all-cry-pl-PRO
Or perhaps the extra a is the durative in this example.
11
Note that the ‘all’ may quantify the plural subject or the plural object.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
Chapter 16: Complex Verb Stems, Part 1 95
Nitáyákohpommatoo’pinnaaniaawa.
nit-wayák-ohpommatoo’p-innaan-yi-aawa
1-both-buy(TI)-1p-pl-PRO
‘We both bought them.’/‘We bought both of them.’12
C. VERBAL PREFIXES
These are prefixes the equivalents of which in most other languages would be
verbs which take embedded clauses, as in the English translations below. Here
are a few of the many such prefixes. (As stated in the introduction to this chapter,
none of these determine the syntactic category of the stem of which they are a
part.)
ohkott- ‘able’
Kítohkottá’po’taki. ‘You were able to work.’
kit-ohkott-a’po’taki
2-able-work
ssáak- ‘try’
Áíssáaka’po’takiwa. ‘He’s trying to work.’
á-ssáak-a’po’taki-wa
dur-try-work-3s
12
Again, note that ‘both’ may quantify the plural subject or the plural object.
13
The future prefix, if that is what we have here, has a short vowel in this position.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
96 Blackfoot Grammar
Iksistt- ‘finish’
Nikáíksisttsoyi. ‘I’ve finished eating.’
n-ikáá-Iksisst-Ioyi
1-perf-finish-eat
The immediately preceding example indicates the need for yet another phonological
rule. Whenever a morpheme which ends in o is followed by a morpheme which
begins with a, the o is replaced by a, as expressed in the following rule:14
o-Replacement
Note the condition stating that this rule does not apply if the a is part of a suffix,15
as in the following example:
14
For a large number of speakers, the o is deleted rather than replaced by a. For such speakers, ‘He
will go adjust ...’ would be Áakotapinniiwa ...
15
Though it apparently does apply before a final (see chapter 17):
nit-itap-oo+at-a:-wa → nitsitapáaatawa ‘I approached him.’
1-toward-go-TA-dir-3s
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
Chapter 16: Complex Verb Stems, Part 1 97
Supplemental Material
The last two examples above illustrate a phonological rule which creates a falling pitch accent.
Whenever a morpheme which ends in a vowel is followed by a morpheme which begins with a
long vowel or diphthong (see chapter 1), a falling pitch is superimposed on the resultant vowel
sequence. If the first vowel and the second vowel are identical, as in the preceding two examples,
the pitch falls throughout the sequence. If the first and second vowel form a diphthong, accents are
written over both the first vowel and the first vowel symbol of the long vowel:
However, if the first vowel is i and the second vowel is not ii, the falling pitch accent is assigned
to the long vowel, whether or not the i is subsequently lost:16
aapániáakiiwa ‘butterfly-woman’
aapáni-aakii-wa
butterfly-woman-3s
16
In addition to the expected loss of i after s (by i-Absorption) and after y (by i-Loss), there is for
many speakers loss of i in these circumstances after n. For example, piikáni + aakii ‘Peigan woman’
may be either piikániáakii or piikánáakii.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
98 Blackfoot Grammar
paahtsáakiiwa ‘mistaken-woman’
paahtsi-aakii-wa
mistake-woman-3s
The following examples demonstrate that this rule is not bled by o-Replacement:
otahkáaokayiiwa ‘robin’
otahko-aokayii-wa
orange-breast-3s
D. ADVERBIAL PREFIXES
1. Manner
Ikkina- ‘gently/easy’
Nitsikkínaiksiinoka. ‘She touched me gently.’
nit-Ikkina-Iksiin-o:k-wa
1-gently-touch(TA)-inv-3s
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
Chapter 16: Complex Verb Stems, Part 1 99
iiyik- ‘strong/hard’
Kitsííyika’po’taki. ‘You worked hard.’
kit-iiyik-a’po’taki
2-hard-work
sok- ‘well/good’
Kitsikáísoka’po’taki. ‘You work very well.’
kit-ik-á-sok-a’po’taki
2-very-dur-good-work
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
100 Blackfoot Grammar
This prefix acts as a variable, with a range of semantic values which includes the
manner prefixes illustrated above. It is used in questions asking about manner
(see chapter 21) and a type of nominalization (Conjunctive Nominals; see chapter
20). As will be seen in the following examples, this morpheme selects the short
person prefixes.17
niitáí’poyo’pi ‘the way one speaks’
niit-á-I’poyi-o’p-yi
how-dur-speak-21:CN-in.s
17
CN abbreviates Conjunctive Nominal.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
Chapter 16: Complex Verb Stems, Part 1 101
2. Degree
sska’- ‘extraordinarily’
(I)sskáí’soka’piiwa. ‘It’s extraordinarily good.’
sska’-sok-a’pii-wa
extra-good-be(II)-sg
3. Rate
Ikkam- ‘fast/quickly’
Áaksíkkamokska’siwa. ‘He will run fast.’
yáak-Ikkam-okska’si-wa
fut-fast-run-3s
iitsiksist- ‘slow(ly)’
Iítsiksistokska’siwa. ‘He runs slowly.’
iitsiksist-okska’si-wa
slow-run-3s
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
102 Blackfoot Grammar
4. Linkers
These are prefixes which indicate the oblique grammatical relation of some
nominal in the clause; they generally serve the same function as prepositions in
English, except that because they are in the verb rather than adjacent to the related
nominal, the hearer (or reader) must sometimes infer from context which nominal
they link.18
The first variant of this prefix immediately follows person prefixes, the second
variant occurs in word-initial position, and the third elsewhere.19
Napayíni nomohpiówatoo’pa ómihka í’ksisakoyihka.
napayín-i n-omohp-Iowatoo-’p-wa om-yi-hka í’ksisako-yi-hka
bread-nonpartic 1-assoc-eat(TI)-theme-3s that-in.s-invs meat-in.s-invs
‘I ate the meat with bread.’
The three variants of this prefix have a distribution parallel to the variants of the
previous linker.
Iihtáwayáakiaawa miistsíi. ‘He was hit with/by a stick.’
iiht-wa:wayáaki-a:-wa miistsíS-i
instr-hit(TA)-dir-3s stick-nonpartic
18
Linkers are often called ‘relative roots’ by Algonquianists.
19
For some speakers the first variant has the form imohp-, and for still others it is o’ohp- or oohp.
The same idiolectal variation is found in the first syllable of the next linker to be presented.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
Chapter 16: Complex Verb Stems, Part 1 103
The remainder of the linkers to be listed, in addition to their linking function, add
directional or spatial information. The first two occur in verbs which describe
motion, or at least imply change of location, and indicate the direction of that
motion or movement. The other may occur in just about any verb.
itap- ‘toward’
Nitáakitapoo kookóówayi. ‘I’ll go to your place.’
nit-yáak-itap-oo k-ookóówa-yi
1-fut-toward-go 2-home-in.s
20
Coalescence 2 accounts for the o in the third syllable of this verb. See footnote 9 of chapter 15.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
104 Blackfoot Grammar
5. Aspect
There are additional prefixes which fit under the label ‘aspect,’ as that term is
defined in chapter 6. Here are a few:
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
Chapter 16: Complex Verb Stems, Part 1 105
6. Non-linking Locationals
ípsst- ‘inside’
Itsípsstsoyo’pa omí ksikkokóówayi. ‘We ate inside the tent.’
it-ipsst-Ioyi-o’pa om-yi ksikkokóówa-yi
there-inside-eat(AI)-21 that-in.s tent-in.s
23
Many speakers regularly reduce the sequence kikáta’- to kíta’-, so this will commonly be heard
as kítao’máóoyihpa.
24
Greg Thomson (personal communication) finds that one discourse function of this prefix is to
indicate that the event expected at that point in the discourse did indeed occur.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
106 Blackfoot Grammar
ohkit- ‘upon’
Istohkítsstoota omi akssíni. ‘Put it on the bed!’
ist-ohkit-ihtoo-t om-yi akihsíN-yi
there-upon-put(TI)-2s(imper) that-in.s bed-in.s
The next example might also seem to involve linking of a nominal, but the
nominal annoma ‘here’ is the object of a transitive verb:
Míístapáaatoot annóóma! ‘Go away from here!’
míístap-áaatoo-t annoma
away-go(TI)-2s(imper) here
EXERCISES
a. Use the correct adjunct from section A of this chapter to translate ‘We21 did
not run.’
25
Usually pronounced [matsówohkitopiiw]; see Coalescence 2 in footnote 9 of chapter 15. ohkit
+ opii is an idiom for ‘ride (a horse).’
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
Chapter 16: Complex Verb Stems, Part 1 107
2. Still using the stem okska’si, translate the following, combining appropriate
adjuncts:
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
CHAPTER 17
1
See Bloomfield (1946, p. 104).
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
109
The portion (here preceded and followed by hyphens for ease of exposition)
common to all of these stems is a verb root.2 Only a few verb roots can alone
serve as a verb stem;3 most, like that above, must occur with a final. The stems
in (a)–(c) differ from each other in that they end in different finals (highlighted).4
And as was stated above, the final determines the syntactic category of the stem.
So the final in (a) determines that the verb stem is AI; consequently that stem
occurs in an intransitive clause; i.e., one with no object unless that object is non-
particular (recall from section C of chapter 7 that objects which are non-particular
in reference do not count as objects for purposes of verb transitivity in Blackfoot).
Likewise, the finals in (b) and (c) determine that the stems of these two examples
are TA and TI, respectively, and occur in transitive clauses.
There are many roots which, like the one in (a)–(c), can occur with different
finals. Here is another set of three sentences with verbs that share a common root,
but this particular root selects different finals to form AI, TI, and TA stems:
The six finals seen in (a)–(f) above are all very common, and there are many other
verb finals which are found in numerous stems.
Stems do not always occur in triples, like the preceding two sets. Many roots
occur with only one or two different finals.
Here are some verb stem sets exhibiting some of the many common finals
(finals are in bold print). The first three sets, like those above, are made up of AI,
TI, and TA stems:
2
The root in these cases exhibits semivowel alternation (see chapter 15); i.e., it is ooy ~ oow.
3
Even for these, it is useful to say that they have ‘zero’ (null) finals.
4
As can be seen by comparing even the few sets of finals in this chapter, many finals can them-
selves be further analyzed into what can be termed pre-finals and finals. It may be possible to consider
medials (mentioned near the start of this chapter) and pre-finals to be filling the same slot in verb
stems.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
110 Blackfoot Grammar
(r) Náaiyaawa ‘They (anim) are six (i.e., there are six of them.)’
(s) Náaoyaawa ‘They (inan) are six.’
The next three sets involve what are known as instrumental finals, because they
indicate the instrument (usually a body part) involved. In these, the instrument is
the mouth.
The next set has a body part medial (sski ‘face’), as well as the instrumental final
seen in the two previous sets.
5
This stem has a zero final.
6
The mm is from M:; see section C of chapter 15.
7
Note that the AI final a:ki is added to the TI final less the portion ii, which is common to a great
many TI stems.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
CHAPTER 18
This chapter describes the formation of complex stems in which the Head is a
derivational suffix; i.e., a suffix which changes the syntactic category of the stem
to which it is added. As with the finals discussed in the previous chapter, the
relevant syntactic categories are TA, TI, AI, and II, but some finals also govern
the potential for occurrence with unlinked1 nominals.
There are two suffixes, áttsi and pi ~ ipi, which derive causative verb stems
from other verb stems.2 These suffixes are added to intransitive stems, never to
transitive stems. The derived causative stem is transitive (unless the subject of
the underlying non-causative verb is non-particular or unspecified; see below).
Causative stems are used in clauses in which the causer is subject and the causee,
which in all cases is understood as the subject of the underlying non-causative
clause, is the primary object. For example, in (a), first person singular is the causer,
and hence subject, and ‘my daughter’ is the causee, and hence primary object.
1
See section D.4 of chapter 16 regarding linkers.
2
There is another suffix which, in the examples available to me, is added to meteorological verbs
to form AI verbs:
(i) Isopómsstaawa ‘He made the wind blow.’
(ii) Nitáakssotamsstaa ‘I’ll make it rain.’
And here is another similar causative:
(iii) Stamokamo’tsstooka ‘Make it straight!’
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
112 Blackfoot Grammar
The limitation that these two causative suffixes are added to intransitive stems is
a morphological property of the causative suffixes themselves, not a consequence
of their meaning or the meaning of the stems to which they are attached. So they
may be used whether or not the underlying non-causative clause has an object.
However, if there is an underlying object, it will be a surface secondary object:
(e) Nítohpommááttsaawa nohkówa omííksi ápotsskinaiksi.
nit-ohpommaa-áttsi-a:-wa n-ohkó-wa om-iksi ápotskina-iksi
1-buy(AI)-cause-dir-3s my-son-3s that-an.p cow-an.p
‘I made my son buy those cows.’
Notice that the verb agrees with ‘son3s’ as primary object, not with the underlying
object, ‘those cows4p,’ which is the surface secondary object.
3
When asked to differentiate (b) from (d), speakers told me that the causation referred to in (d) is
more direct. For example, you would use (d) if the subject rocked babies to sleep.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
Chapter 18: Some Concrete Finals 113
Supplemental Material
If the underlying subject of the stem is non-particular or unspecified, in which case it cannot
be a surface primary object (see section C of chapter 7), the causative verb stem must be made
intransitive by addition of the final a:ki,4 which forms AI verbs:
We stated above that the causative finals are always added to intransitive stems. While this is
true, the stem to which they are added is not always the usual intransitive stem. For example, the
regular AI stem for ‘beckon, make signs’ is a’psstaki; yet the stem to which the causative suffixes
are added is a’psstoyi, as seen in (g) and (h):
Transitive stems which have a benefactee as primary object are derived from other
stems by addition of one of two suffixes: -o and –mo ~ -omo. Though the facts
are complicated (see Taylor (1969, section 670 and 694)), the following rough
summary of their distribution may be of value.
The first of the two benefactive suffixes (-o) seems to be added to verb roots;
compare the following non-benefactive and benefactive sentence pairs:
(j) 1. Iihpómmaawa ónnikii. ‘He bought milk.’
iihpomm-aa-wa ónnikiS-i
buy-AI-3s milk-nonpartic
4
Also seen in (d), (g), (m), and (x) of chapter 17.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
114 Blackfoot Grammar
For all benefactives, an underlying object (if any) will be the surface secondary
object. So the pronoun for the baked items, which is the primary object in (k.1), is
the secondary object in (k.2).
The suffix -mo ~ -omo is usually added to transitive stems (mo after vowels,
omo after consonants); in particular, it is added to what generally appear to be TA
stems, as illustrated in the following examples of TA and benefactive pairs:
(l) 1 Kóta’siksi nitsííyissksipistayaawa.
k-ota’s-iksi nit-ii-yIssksipist-a:-yi-aawa
2-mount-an.p 1-past-tie^up(TA)-dir-pl-PRO
‘I tied up your horses.’
Observe that in (l.1) the being which is tied up is the primary object, while in (l.2)
it is the secondary object.
(m) 1. Anna ponokáwa kitáaksinnootatawaatsiksi?
ann-wa ponoká-wa kit-yáak-Innootat-a:-waatsiksi
that-3s elk-3s 2-fut-butcher(TA)-dir-3s(nonaffirm)
‘Will you butcher that elk?’
2. Kitáaksinnootatomookihpaatsiksi?
kit-yáak-Innootat-omo-o:k-i-hp-waatsiksi
2-fut-butcher-ben(TA)-inv-2:1-nonaffirm-PRO
‘Will you butcher him for me?’
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
Chapter 18: Some Concrete Finals 115
Supplemental Material
There are many cases where the suffix –mo ~ omo is added to other than the TA stem. E.g., in
the following example, it is added to the AI stem, less what looks like the AI final aa; but we
cannot say -omo is added to a root in this case, for the corresponding TA stem (sstaahka), which
presumably is based on the same root, lacks the ht portion, as seen in (n.3):
And it is not clear what stem the benefactive suffix is attached to in (o.3); compare the stems of
(o.1) and (o.2):
Another final which, like the causative finals of section A, is always added to an
intransitive verb stem, is the accompaniment suffix -:m. (The colon here represents
the fact that this suffix causes lengthening of a preceding short vowel.) Unique to
this final,5 however, is that it requires preverbal element ohpok- on the same verb.
The resulting stem is transitive animate, and both its subject and primary object
5
I am assuming that the suffix -:m seen here should not be identified with the TA final -m seen in
stems such as i’tsskaam ‘fight’(TA); cf. i’tsskaa ‘fight’(AI).
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
116 Blackfoot Grammar
are understood as logical subjects of the underlying verb. For example, to animate
intransitive stem a’po’taki ‘work’ there corresponds TA stem ohpoka’po’takiim
‘work with.’ So in the following example, both the surface subject nitána and the
surface primary object nohkóyi are understood as participating in some work, but
the sentence additionally includes the information that nitána has initiated the
accompaniment of nohkóyi in the work.6
(p) Nitána iihpoká’po’takiimiiwa nohkóyi.
n-itán-wa iihpok-a’po’taki-:m-ii-wa n-ohko-yi
1-daughter-3s past:accomp-work(AI)-TA-3:4-3s 1-son-4s
‘My daughter worked with my son.’
6
Actually, the situation is not this clear. The motivation for choosing which member of the set
understood as underlying subject to make the surface subject is as subtle as the choice made by
English speakers utilizing the English equivalents of such Blackfoot sentences.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
Chapter 18: Some Concrete Finals 117
length vowels such as o:.) For example, the subject of (t) is understood as both the
one who did the shooting and the one who was shot:
(t) Isskonákatohsiwa. ‘He shot himself.’
i-sskonákat-o:hsi-wa
past-shoot(TA)-refl(AI)-3s
Addition of the final -o:tsiiyi ~ -tsiiyi to TA stems forms AI stems which describe
reciprocal action between members of a set as subject. (The variant without initial
o: occurs after stems ending in t.) So, for example, each of the horses mentioned
in (x) is understood to both bite and be bitten by at least one of the other horses.7
(x) Omiksi ponokáómitaiksi áísiksipotsiiyiyaawa.
om-iksi ponokáómitaa-iksi á-siksip-o:tsiiyi-yi-aawa
that-an.p horse-an.p dur-bite(TA)-recipr(AI)-pl-PRO
‘Those horses are biting each other.’
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
118 Blackfoot Grammar
There is also a TA reciprocal final -o:tsiim ~ -tsiim, used apparently when the
speaker wishes to ascribe responsibility for initiating the reciprocal action to one
party, which is then the subject of the TA verb:
(z) Otáwáa’psskattsiimoka nohkówa ómi nínaayi.
ot-á-wáa’psskat-tsiim-ok-wa n-ohkó-wa om-yI nínaa-yI
3-dur-bet(TA)-recipr(TA)-inv-3s 1-son-3s that-4s man-4s
‘That man4s is betting my son3s.’
F. DENOMINAL VERBS
There are finals which form verbs when added to noun stems.8 Five are presented
here.
8
If the finals are viewed as verbs, then the noun stems can be considered to be incorporated in
the verb stem.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
Chapter 18: Some Concrete Finals 119
-yi ~ Ø ‘be’
As stated in section D of chapter 4, the null allomorph of this suffix is used only
with a third person subject in an independent clause.
Kitáínayihpoááwa? ‘Are you chiefs?’
kit-á- Ina9-yi-hpoaawa
2-dur-chief-be-2p(nonaffirm)
9
The stems for ‘chief’ and ‘man’ both have allomorphs which end in a short vowel when
followed by a non-null derivational suffix.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
120 Blackfoot Grammar
Some kin terms have a different non-initial form when verbalized with this final:
Nitónni. ‘I have a father.’ (cf. inníwa above)
Nitó’si. ‘I have an older brother.’ (cf. i’síwa above)
EXERCISE
With the help of the Blackfoot Dictionary and chapter 23, translate the following
into Blackfoot:
10
Evidently, this derivatioinal suffix ‘have’ is Ø after non-permanent S, and the S is unrealized
in this enviroment.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
CHAPTER 19
The verb paradigms which have been presented thus far are used only in
independent (main) clauses. This chapter describes verb forms used in subordinate
clauses (sections A and B) and in commands (section C).
There are two sets of verb paradigms used in subordinate clauses, the
Conjunctive1 and the Subjunctive. As will be illustrated below, which of these
two sets of paradigms is used in a dependent clause is determined by the content
of that clause, the Subjunctive appearing in what can be characterized as clauses
which are ‘presumptive’ or ‘conditional’ in meaning.
The Conjunctive paradigm set is the simpler of the two to describe in that it is
closely related formally to the set of verb paradigms in independent clauses, which
have been presented in earlier chapters. Roughly, the Conjunctive paradigms
differ from the corresponding Independent paradigms by the presence of an hs
and a suffix yi. The hs immediately follows the verb stem in AI and II stems; in TA
and TI verbs it follows the theme suffix. The suffix yi is last in the verb, preceded
by any agreement suffixes. Another significant difference is that third person is
marked by a prefix ot ~ w.
The Subjunctive paradigms show more extensive differences from the
Independent paradigms, including the lack of person prefixes.
Each paradigm from each set is exemplified in the next two sections of this
chapter. The complete paradigms are presented in Appendix A.
Clauses which call for verb forms from this set are the following:2
1. Temporal clauses of past occurrence; note that the verb contains prefix á’,
glossed ‘inchoat(ive)’:
1
Called the Conjunct in earlier works such as Frantz (1971).
2
‘conj’ abbreviates ‘Conjunctive.’
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
122 Blackfoot Grammar
3. Embedded clauses
a. As subject:
(e) Ííkssoka’piiwa otáísootaahsi. ‘It’s good that
i:k-soka’pii-wa ot-á-sootaa-hs-yi it is raining.’
very-good(II)-sg 3-dur-rain(II)-conj-conj
3
The prefix ááhk ‘non-factive’ appears here with the short allomorphs of the person agreement
prefixes (see chapter 6, section D). For many speakers, this morpheme selects the long allomorphs.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
Chapter 19: Other Verb Paradigms 123
b. As primary object:
(f) Nítssksinii’pa kitsówatoohsoaayi. ‘I know you ate it.’
nit-ssksini-’p-wa kit-Iowatoo-hs-oaa-yi
1-know(TI)-theme-in.s 2-eat(TI)-conj-2p-conj
c. As secondary object:
(g) Nitánikkoowa kitsikákomimmahsi nitána.
nit-wa:nIt-k-oowa kit-i:k-akomimm-a:-hs-yi n-itán-wa
1-tell(TA)-inv-unspec 2-very-love(TA)-dir-conj-conj 1-da.-3s
‘I was told that you love my daughter.’
4
More examples may be found in section C of chapter 22.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
124 Blackfoot Grammar
Clauses which call for verb forms from this set are the following:5
1. Suppositional antecedent (an ‘if’ clause) for a consequent expressed as the main
clause; the Subjunctive verb in such clauses will usually have prefix ikkam ‘if’:
(l) Ikkamáyo’kainoainiki, nitáakahkayi.
ikkam-á-yo’kaa-inoainiki nit-yáak-wa:hkayi
if-dur-sleep(AI)-2p(subj) 1-fut-go^home
‘If you2p are sleeping, I’ll go home.’
2. Temporal (‘when’) clauses which refer to the future; most make use of the
inchoative prefix a’ in the subordinate clause, and the time linker it in the main
clause:
5
New abbreviations here include ‘subj’ for Subjunctive.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
Chapter 19: Other Verb Paradigms 125
Iterative temporal antecedent clauses make use of preverb ihkan ~ kan ‘all,’ and if
the main clause verb describes a process, it has the durative prefix:
(q) Kanáísootaasi, itáípiimma. ‘Whenever it rains,
kan-á-isootaa-si it-á-IpiiM:-wa he goes in.’
all-dur-rain(II)-3s(subj) then-dur-enter-3s
These are verb forms used to tell someone to do something. The force of such
commands can be softened by use of preverbs such as noohk-, kipp-, and stam-, all
of which are difficult to assign a gloss to. In their use with imperatives, however,
these preverbs are near functional equivalents to English please.
Because the subject of all imperative forms is second person, there are singular
and plural forms in each paradigm. The AI and TI forms end in -t if the subject is
singular (2s) or in -k if the subject is plural (2p). There are no person prefixes in
any imperative paradigm. Here are AI and TI examples:
singular addressee plural addressee
(r) Ooyít! Ooyík! ‘Eat!’
ooyi-t ooyi-k
eat (AI)-2s(imp) eat(AI)-2p(imp)
6
Two glottal stops together (as a result of Glottal Metathesis) are reduced to one. See Appendix B,
where this is captured by Glottal Reduction.
7
s-Connection, which would insert an i before the s of the suffix si, does not apply. Evidently this
insertion is blocked before suffixes; see the revised version of s-Connection b in Appendix B.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
126 Blackfoot Grammar
The TA imperative paradigm has more forms, for it must show agreement with
person of the object. (See Appendix A.6.) As in the other TA paradigms, if the
object is first person plural, number of the second person subject cannot be shown
(w). Number of a third person object is not reflected (unless an attached pronoun
is present, of course). The suffixes used with a third person object lengthen a
preceding short vowel (v).
singular addressee plural addressee
(u) Noohkohkókkit! Noohkohkókkik ‘Please give it
noohk-ohkot-Okit noohk-ohkot-Okik to me!’
please-give(TA)-2s:1(imp) please-give(TA)-2p:1(imp)
I have found differences among speakers, even from the same reserve, in the shape of these
8
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
Chapter 19: Other Verb Paradigms 127
EXERCISE
With the help of the Blackfoot Dictionary, and chapter 23, translate the following
into Blackfoot:
forms.
9
From Uhlenbeck (1938, p. 171). This example shows that the unreal can be used with ikkam-
to function as an optative/wish.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
CHAPTER 20
Nominalizations
There are at least five ways of forming noun stems from verb stems. These
will be presented here as: 1. Reclassification; 2. Abstract nominalization; 3.
Instrument nominalization; 4. Conjunctive nominalization; 5. Transitive theme
nominalization. In section F we will illustrate their use in complete sentences,
showing that most such nominals are the functional equivalent of English relative
clauses.
A. RECLASSIFICATION
An intransitive verb stem may be used as a noun stem which references the subject
of the underlying verb. For example the AI stem áyo’kaa ‘sleep’ can serve as a
noun stem meaning ‘one who sleeps.’ Such stems may be complex; in fact, all
except stative stems apparently have a tense or aspect prefix—this particular stem
has the durative prefix á—and may have any number of other morphemes. Here
is a noun utilizing the just-mentioned durative stem for ‘sleep’:
omiksi áyo’kaiksi ‘those sleeping ones’
om-iksi á-Io’kaa-iksi
that-an.p dur-sleep(AI)-an.p
As evidence that we are in fact dealing with a noun, observe that áyo’kaiksi has
the plural inflectional suffix iksi, which, as we have seen in chapter 2, is used for
animate gender nouns.
Here are further examples of reclassification; the first two contain the simplex
stem for ‘sleep’ as in the previous example; they also include additional prefixes
in the stem. (Note: Because -wa ‘3s’ is used on both nouns and verbs, singulars of
these nominals are often homophonous with a verb form.)
ánniksi áakso’kaiksi ‘those who will sleep’
ann-iksi áak-Io’kaa-iksi
that-an.p fut-sleep(AI)-an.p
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
Chapter 20: Nominalizations 129
áíssksinimáa’tstohkiiksi ‘teachers’
á-ssksinimáa’tstohki-iksi
dur-teach(AI)-an.p
stoyíístsi ‘winters’
sstoyíí-istsi
cold-in.p
káta’yáípasskaawa ‘non-dancer’
káta’-yá-ipasskaa(AI)-wa
neg-dur-dance-3s
Note that in the following example the logical object of the underlying verb is
included:
omiksi ííkaayaokstakiiksi sináákia’tsii ‘those who have
om-iksi ííkaa-ya-okstaki-iksi sináákia’tsiS-i read books’
that-an.p past:perf-dur(?)-read(AI)-an.p book-nonpartic
B. ABSTRACT NOMINALIZATION
Noun stems are formed from intransitive verbs by addition of n ~ hsiN (glossed
as ‘nom’ in the examples to follow); the first allomorph is used with stems ending
in -aa, and the second allomorph with other verbs. Such noun stems either refer
abstractly to the state or process described by the underlying verb, or in the case
of processes which generally result in a product, to the product of that process.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
130 Blackfoot Grammar
For example, when such a noun is formed from the AI verb stem okstaki ‘read,’
the resultant noun stem okstakssiN means ‘reading.’ If the same suffix is added to
sinaaki ‘make an image/write/draw,’ the resultant noun will mean either ‘writing/
drawing’ (the processes) or ‘written document/picture’ (the products).
Here are examples of nouns formed from aa-final verb stems:
o’kááni ‘sleep (n.)’
o’kaa-n-yi
sleep-nom-in.s
Examples with other verb stems; note that the third and fourth examples differ
only in gender, showing that not all abstract nominals are of inanimate gender:
piókska’ssini ‘a long run’
pi-okska’si-hsiN-yi1
far-run-nom-in.s
sináákssiiksi ‘photos/pictures’2
sinaaki-hsiN-iksi
make^image(AI)-nom-an.p
1
This example illustrates that if ih is in a position where both Presibilation and Postsibilation are
applicable, neither applies and we get only a long ss. This is accounted for in Appendix B as ih-Loss.
2
This noun will be of inanimate gender if the object pictured is normally represented by an inan-
imate gender noun.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
Chapter 20: Nominalizations 131
sináákssiistsi ‘writings’
sinaaki-hsiN-istsi
make^image(AI)-nom-ip
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
132 Blackfoot Grammar
isttókimaa’tsiistsi ‘drums’
isttokimaa-a’tsiS-istsi
drum(AI)-instr-ip
sisóya’tsiiksi ‘scissors’
sisoyi-a’tsiS-iksi
cut^in^strips(AI)-instr-an.p
oohkóyimaa’tsisa ‘lid’
yoohkoyimaa-a’tsiS-wa
cover(AI)-instr-3s
Possessive affixes with such nouns indicate possession or ownership, not the
subject of the underlying verb:
nitokáa’tsisi ‘my lariat’
nit-okaa-a’tsiS-yi
1-snare(AI)-instr-in.s
D. CONJUNCTIVE NOMINALS
Nominal expressions are formed from both transitive and intransitive verbs by
addition of affixes nearly identical to those of the Conjunctive paradigms (see
chapter 19 and Appendix A); they differ from corresponding Conjunctive verb
affixes in two ways:
1. Where the latter have -hs or -’s, the nominals have -hp (-o’p in place of the
-’s of 21 forms).3
3
To utilize the TA Conjunctive Verb chart in Appendix A to form Conjunctive nominals, one
must ‘undo’ the effects of Presibilation; i.e., certain ss clusters must be recognized as coming from
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
Chapter 20: Nominalizations 133
2. They lack the yi suffix which marks all Conjunctive verb forms.
The affixes indicate the person and number of the underlying subject, and, in the
case of transitive verbs, of the underlying primary object as well. It is probably
more realistic to speak of this phenomenon as clause nominalization, for not only
do the verbs agree with subject and object, but all other elements which normally
accompany verbs in clauses may be present with Conjunctive Nominals (CN).
That we are dealing with nominalization here is evident, however, in that the
verbs of such clauses occur with nominal suffixes after the Conjunctive affixes, as
will be seen in examples below. Note that while most such nominals are classified
as inanimate in grammatical gender, many formed from verbs containing the
‘instrument/means’ prefix (see below) are of animate grammatical gender.
The semantic reference (meaning) of Conjunctive Nominals is determined by
makeup of the stem and the syntactic class of the underlying verb. The relevant
factors are listed and exemplified in sections D.1–4
If the verb’s stem-initial morpheme is a linker (see section D.4 of chapter 16),
the nominal refers to the linked argument. The following examples are grouped
according to the linker involved.
Locational Nominals
underlying ihs.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
134 Blackfoot Grammar
The preceding examples all involve intransitive verb stems. The following are
transitive:
omistsi kitsítsinoohpistsi ‘the places I saw you’
om-istsi kit-it-Ino-o-hp-istsi
that-ip 2-there-see(TA)-1:2-CN-ip
Temporal Nominals
These utilize a linker it- ~ iit- ‘when,’ which is homophonous with the location
linker:
otsíto’toohpiaawa ‘when they arrived’
ot-it-o’too-hp-yi-aawa
3-when-arrive(AI)-CN-pl-PRO
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
Chapter 20: Nominalizations 135
Instrumental Nominals
These involve the ‘instrument/means’ prefix omoht- ~ iiht- ~ oht-. Verb stems
containing this linker are used extensively to construct vocabulary for items
newly introduced to the culture:
iihtáóoyo’pa ‘fork/what one eats with’
iiht-á-ooyi-o’p-wa
instr-dur-eat(AI)-21:CN-3s
Because such nominals can become conventional names for items, i.e., a kind
of idiom, it is not too surprising that a given construction can refer to more than
one entity, and with these two meanings, be assigned to two gender classes. For
example, when the following construction serves as the idiom for ‘dish cloth,’ it
is of animate gender. However, when it has its literal meaning it is assigned to the
inanimate gender class.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
136 Blackfoot Grammar
4
Observe that although, as stated above, many conjunctive nominals are idioms, it is the
construction pattern with certain verbs that is an idiom, and not individual lexical items. If we were
dealing here with individual lexical items as idioms, we would expect that the means of indicating
possession of such items would follow the patterns seen in chapter 14, rather than what is shown here.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
Chapter 20: Nominalizations 137
If the verb’s stem-initial morpheme is the abstract manner prefix niit- ~ aanist- (see
section D.1 of chapter 16), the nominal refers to the manner of the predication, as
illustrated in the following examples:
maanistániihpi ‘the way he said (something)’
m-aanist-wa:nii-hp-yi
3-how-say(AI)-CN-is
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
Blackfoot Grammar
If the stem does not contain a linker or the abstract manner prefix, the reference of
the nominal depends upon the syntactic class of the verb stem.
Paratransitive
If the verb stem is paratransitive5 the resultant nominal refers to the (secondary)
object of the underlying verb:6
iiyó’pi ‘what we21 ate’
iiyi-o’p-yi
past:eat-21:CN-in.s
Other Intransitive
In the case of other intransitive verbs (what might be called ‘true’ intransitives)
the resultant nominal refers to the ‘fact that’ the predication takes (or has taken)
place:
ánnohka otsó’kaahpi, ‘now that he’s asleep’
annohka ot-Io’kaa-hp-yi
now 3-sleep-CN-in.s
5
Paratransitive verbs are AI verbs which may occur with non-particular or unspecified objects;
see section C of chapter 7.
6
Evidently, such Conjunctive Nominals are not possible with paratransitive stems ending in aa-;
such stems take suffix -n (the nominalizer seen in section B above?) instead of hp. For example, one
speaker rejected otsskíítaahpoaawaistsi ‘the goods they baked’ and preferred otsskíítaanoaawaistsi.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
139
Transitive Inanimate
Paraditransitive
7
See supplemental material of section D of chapter 7.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
140 Blackfoot Grammar
Monotransitive
For monotransitive TA verbs (i.e., those which do not take secondary objects) the
Conjunctive Nominal refers to the ‘fact that’ the predication takes (or has taken)
place:
kitsikákomimmokihpi ‘that you love me’
kit-ikakomimm-Oki-hp-yi
2-love(TA)-inv:1-CN-in.s
This section deals with nominals formed from transitive verb stems plus a theme
suffix.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
Chapter 20: Nominalizations 141
For this construction, the subject of the underlying verb can only be third person,
and the noun is inflected for number only.
This construction is possible only for subject and object combinations which
would call for the direct theme suffix (see chapter 10). The resultant noun is
inflected to agree with the subject of the underlying verb. The agreement affixes
here and in E.3 are essentially those from the possessive paradigm (see chapter
14), except that ‘agreement’ with 21 is null; i.e., the absence of affixes indicates
21. (Note: Here again, because -wa ‘3s’ is used on both nouns and verbs, singulars
are often homophonous with a verb form, as indicated in parentheses.) Here are
several such nominals, all but the last of two of which contain TA stem Ino ‘see’:
For this construction, the subject of the underlying verb can only be third person,
and the underlying object need not be specified. The noun is inflected for number
and for the underlying object (if specified) by means of possessive affixes.
8
I have found only a few examples of this construction, and am successful only about one-third
of the time in attempting to create additional acceptable examples. Further research is needed to
determine the subclass of TA verbs which can serve as the base for this construction.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
142 Blackfoot Grammar
This construction is possible only for subject and object combinations which would
call for the inverse theme suffix (see chapter 11). The resultant noun is inflected
to agree with the object of the underlying verb. (Note: Here again, because -wa
‘3s’ is used on both nouns and verbs, singulars are often homophonous with a verb
form, as indicated in parentheses below.) Here are several such nominals:
F. RELATIVE CLAUSES
9
Though in most cases the ‘free’ relative clause is accompanied by a demonstrative which could
conceivably be considered to be a pronoun modified by the relative clause; see section B of chapter 13
regarding demonstratives as pronouns.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
Chapter 20: Nominalizations 143
The next two examples are sentences found in Uhlenbeck (1938) and have been
reelicited. The suffix glossed ‘rel’ is what Uhlenbeck calls the ‘relative’ suffix.
It is frequently found in relative clause constructions, though on the Head noun
and demonstrative as well as on the nominal in the relative clause. (It is not clear
whether or not this suffix should be identified with the post-inflectional suffix
-hka seen in section E of chapter 13.)
Annistssk anákimaa’tsiistssk nitsinííhpistssk ómahkoyaawa.
ann-istsi-hk anakimaa’tsiS-istsi-hk nit-inii-hp-istsi-hk omahko-yi-aawa
that-ip-rel lamp-ip-rel 1-see(TI)-CN[D.3]-ip-rel big(II)-pl-PRO
‘Those lamps which I saw are big.’
The next example has a relative clause which is ‘extraposed’ to the end of the
sentence, away from its demonstrative.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
144 Blackfoot Grammar
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
Chapter 20: Nominalizations 145
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
CHAPTER 21
Questions
For every language there are two broad functional types of questions, often
referred to as ‘yes/no’ questions, which ask for confirmation or denial of the
truth of a proposition, and ‘content’ questions, which ask for other information.
Sections A and B deal with these two types in Blackfoot.
A. YES/NO QUESTIONS
These make use of what we will refer to as non-affirmative endings, either alone,
as in (a)–(g), or with an interrogative prefix as seen in (h)–(p). The interrogative
prefixes are the same as two of the negative prefixes seen in section A of chapter
16: káta’ ~ Ikáta’ and sta’. The non-affirmative endings are described below.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
Chapter 21: Questions 147
1
The sequences of prefixes n or k plus Ikáta’ are usually reduced to níta’ and kíta’, so (j)–(m)
would normally be heard as Kíta’yáaka’po’takihpa?, Kítai’nóókaiksaawa?, Kítai’ihpiyihpoááwa?,
and Kíta’yáakohkottsspommóóhpa?, respectively.
2
See Vowel Epenthesis in Appendix B regarding the extra vowel i in the third syllable of this
verb.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
148 Blackfoot Grammar
1. If the subject or primary object of the verb is third person, then one of the
following is used according to the gender and number of that subject or object:
In addition, the final vowel of the verb stem (theme suffix in TA verbs) is accented
[(a-c), (g-i), (k), (n), (p) above].
2. If neither the subject nor primary object is third person, the following are true:
a) -hpa is added if plural suffixes are not called for, i.e., if neither the subject
nor primary object is 1p, 21, or 2p (as in (d), (j) and (o));
And the verb does not end in an enclitic pronoun (see below under Supplemental Material).
3
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
Chapter 21: Questions 149
c) the final vowel of the word (a in every case) is voiced (in contrast to the
usual situation in which word-final vowels are voiceless); see (d–f), (j–m), and
(o).
Supplemental Material
Based upon their form when the third person subject or primary object nominal follows the verb,
the third person non-affirmative endings should be viewed as made up of a suffix plus pronominal
enclitic. That is, the same reasoning that led to description of aawa, áyi, aiksi, and aistsi as
pronouns in chapter 9 also leads us to recognize these non-affirmative pronouns:4
-atsiksi ‘3s/in.s’
-aiksaawa ‘an.p’
-aistsaawa ‘ip’
When these pronouns are not present in questions, the final vowel of the verb is usually voiced.
Compare the following to examples (a), (b), and (g) of section A above:
Observe that the suffix wa in examples such as (q)–(s) (and also (f) below) cannot be identified
with the wa previously glossed as ‘3s,’ because it can reflect a plural nominal, as in (r) and (s). This
wa evidently should be glossed as ‘3:nonaffirm.’
B. CONTENT QUESTIONS
4
These enclitics are also used on the interrogative pronoun takaa:
takáaatsiksi ‘Who is she?’
takáaiksaawa ‘Who are they?’
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
150 Blackfoot Grammar
1.a. Human
(a) Takáa/Tahkáa áwaasai’níwa? ‘Who is crying?’
takáa/tahkáa á-wa:sai’ni-wa (more lit: ‘who (is) the crier?’)
who dur-cry-3s
5
See Supplemental Material of section A regarding -wa as plural.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
Chapter 21: Questions 151
There are two ways to question the identity of an inanimate gender variable.
The most common way uses the II verb stem anistapii ‘be’ seen in the previous
example:
(h) Tsá anistápííwa annííhka kitohpómmatoohpihka?
tsá anistapii-wa ann-yi-hka it-ohpommatoo-hp-yi-hka
what be(II)-3:nonaffirm that-in.s-rel 2-buy(TI)-CN-in.s-rel
‘What did you buy?’ (more lit: ‘What is it that you bought?’)
2. Participant as Possessor
(j) Takáa otápotskinááma kitsí’nitawa? ‘Whose cow did you kill?’
takáa ot-apotskinaam-wa kit-I’nit-a-wa
who 3-cow-3s 2-kill-dir-3s
Notice that even though ‘cow’ is marked as possessed by third person in (j), it
is not demoted to minor third person as predicted by the rule stated in section
D of chapter 2. Presumably this is because the identity of the possessor is not
established, and could even be the speaker or the addressee.
3. Oblique Nominal
6
See chapter 16, section D.4.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
152 Blackfoot Grammar
ááhsa, as well as tsá plus anistapii or anistapssi seen in the examples of 1 above,
there is a particular question word tsimá for locational obliques, and an additional
verb stem anistsii for questions about time. Examples follow:
(k) Ááhsa kómohto’tóóhpa? ‘Why did you come?’
ááhsa k-omoht-o’too-hpa (‘What [is it that] you came for?’)
what 2-means-arrive-nonaffirm
Observe that ‘when’ questions concerning the past, as in (p), use verb suffix -yi
(glossed ‘?’ because its origin is unknown to me),7 while those about the future, as
in (q), use a Subjunctive affix.
(q) Tsá anistsíísi kitáaksoyihpoááwa? ‘When will you2p eat?’
tsá anistsii-si kit-áak-Ioyi-hpoaawa
what be^time-sg(subj) 2-fut-eat(AI)-2p:nonaffirm
7
It is conceivable that it is the same mysterious suffix mentioned in note 2 of chapter 24.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
Chapter 21: Questions 153
Questions about amounts make use of tsá plus a verb with root niitsi.
(v) Tsá niitsówa katsikíístsi? ‘How many shoes
tsá niitso-wa k-atsikiN-istsi do you have?’
what be^number(II)-nonaffirm 2-shoe-ip
8
In such questions, ann is more often than not reduced to n. So, for example, (s) below will
normally be heard as Náátsiksi Tsaani?
9
In fact, several years ago, fluent speakers from the Blood Reserve insisted that sentences such
as (r) and (s) are incomplete without one.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
154 Blackfoot Grammar
Questions asking about manner utilize tsá plus the manner prefix niit- ~ a:nist-:
(y) Tsá niitá’pao’takíwaatsiksi?
tsá niit-a’p-a-o’taki-waatsiksi
what manner-PREF-dur-work-sg:nonaffirm
‘How does she work?’/‘What kind of work does she do?
‘Why’ questions can be formed utilizing prefix máak ~ Imaak, in addition to the
method seen in (k) and (l) above.
Máakssawahkayíwaatsiksi? ‘Why didn’t she go home?’
máak-saw-wa:hkayi-waatsiksi
why-neg-go^home-sg:nonaffirm
EXERCISES
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
CHAPTER 22
A. EMBEDDED ‘QUESTIONS’
1. Yes/No Sub-type
1
The final a of áánistsisa is not part of any morpheme per se, but is optionally added to any word
which would otherwise end in a consonant.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
Chapter 22: Complement Clause Types 157
2. Content Sub-type
Examples (d) and (e) illustrate embedded ‘questions’ dealing with the identity
of subject or animate object of the complement verb. In such cases, as opposed
to those we will deal with next, we find a demonstrative followed by the kind of
nominalization we called Reclassification (d) and Inverse Theme nominalization
(e) in chapter 20. Also, note that the accompanying independent verb is inflected
to agree with the person whose identity is at issue (this makes (d) ambiguous; it
can also mean ‘I know (am acquainted with) the one who is coming’).
(d) Nítssksinoawa annááhka áwáaistóówahka.
nit-ssksino-a:-wa ann-wa-hka á-wa:istoo-wa-hka
1-know(TA)-dir-3s that-3s-rel dur-come-3s-rel
‘I know who is coming.’
Examples (f) and (g) below deal with a ‘value’ or identity that is neither subject
nor animate primary object of the complement verb. (The thing bought could
be animate, and it is the logical object of the verb ‘buy,’ but the underlying
verb in these examples is morphologically intransitive; i.e., it is paratransitive—
see chapter 7.) In such cases, nominalized verbs (chapter 20) are used in the
complement; and again, they are the same type used in relative clauses. Example
(f) has an ‘abstract’ nominalization, and (g) has a Conjunctive Nominal.
(f) Nítssksiniihpa annííhka nohkówa otohpómmaanihka.
nit-ssksini-hp-wa ann-yi-hka n-ohk-wa ot-ohpommaa-n-yi-hka
1-know(TI)-theme-3s that-in.s-rel 1-son-3s 3-buy(AI)-nom/conj-in.s-rel
‘I know what my son bought.’
2
This example is of special interest because the main verb (‘know’) is inflected to agree with the
subject of the complement; i.e., the complement subject is ‘copied’ as object of the main verb. This is a
common process in Blackfoot syntax, and is not limited to subjects; see Frantz (1978, 1979, and 1980).
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
158 Blackfoot Grammar
In (h) we again find the complement verb in the Conjunctive Nominal form, in
this case referring to the non-instigative cause for the dancing by virtue of the
presence of the linker (glossed ‘means’) that would be present in the corresponding
independent verb; compare nomohtsspíyi nitsi’táámssi ‘I danced because I was
happy.’
(h) Nítssksiniihpa komohtsspíyihpi. ‘I know why you danced.’
nit-ssksini-hp-wa k-omoht-ihpiyi-hp-yi
1-know(TI)-theme-sg 2-means-dance-conj-in.s
B. EMBEDDED ‘COMMANDS’
As we see in (i), such complements in Blackfoot have verbs inflected with affixes
from the Conjunctive paradigm plus a prefix ááhk (glossed ‘might’), which in
some contexts seems to mean ‘perhaps’ or ‘non-factive.’ This combination of
ááhk and conjunct inflection is also found in purpose clauses (see section A.2 of
chapter 19) and, as we shall see in the next section, in embedded ‘wishes.’
(i) Nitáánistawa mááhksoyssi. ‘I told him to eat.’
nit-wa:nist-a:-wa m-ááhk-Ioyi-hsi
1-say(TA)-dir-3s 3-might-eat(AI)-conj
C. EMBEDDED ‘WISHES’
(k) Nohkówa íksstaawa nááhkahkayssi.
n-ohko-wa Iksstaa-wa Iksstaa-wa n-ááhk-wa:hkayi-hsi
1-son-3s want(AI)-3s want(AI)-3s 1-might-go^home-conj
‘My son wants me to go home.’
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
Chapter 22: Complement Clause Types 159
Examples (k) and (l) are synonymous, as are (m) and (n); the second member of
each pair differs only in that the complement subject is ‘copied’ as matrix object
(see Supplementary Material in section A.1). More important for our purposes
here, the complement verb has the non-factive prefix ááhk and inflectional affixes
from the Conjunctive paradigm.
Examples (o) and (p) both have Conjunctive Nominal endings instead of just
Conjunctive endings on the complement verb, suggesting that such complements
don’t belong with the embedded ‘wishes’ in our classification. Examples (o) and
(p) differ in that in (o) the complement is subject of ‘hard,’ while in (p) ‘dried
meats’ is subject of ‘hard.’
(o) Iiksíyikowa ááhkanistsipikksstsiihpi káyiistsi.
iik-Iyiko-wa ááhk-a:nist-Ipikkssti-hp-yi kayi-istsi
very-hard(II)-sg might-manner-chew(TI)-CN-in.s dried^meat-ip
‘It’s hard to chew dried meat.’
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
160 Blackfoot Grammar
D. EMBEDDED ‘STATEMENTS’
The verb omai’tsi ‘believe’ also takes Conjunctive verbs in its complements:
(r) Kitohkíímaana áómai’tsima kitssáyssi.
kit-ohkiimaan-wa á-omai’tsi-m-wa kit-sayi-hsi
2-wife-3s dur-believe(TI)-th-sg 2-lie-conj
‘Your wife believes that you lied.’
The verb ssksini ‘know’ generally takes Conjunctive verbs in its complements:3
(s) Nitáíssksinimáa’tsaiksi ssksinímiaaw
nit-á-ssksinimáa’tsi-a:-iksi ssksini-m-yi-aawa
1-dur-teach-dir-an.p know(TI)-th-pl-PRO
nitáaksspommoahsaawa. ‘My students know
nit-áak-sspommo-a:-hsi-aawa that I will help them.’
1-fut-help-dir-conj^pl-PRO
3
But not in ‘embedded questions’; see (c), (d), (f), and (g) above.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
CHAPTER 23
The following is a checklist which can be used as a guide for exercises in this
book which require translating from English into Blackfoot. Of course, following
these steps will never guarantee an idiomatic Blackfoot language output, but will
at least help the student of Blackfoot take all rules and most irregularities into
account.
Important reminder: When selecting stems from the Dictionary during the
translation process, do not rely entirely on information in the English Index of the
Dictionary, but use the Index to guide you to the correct entry in the Blackfoot-
English portion.
1. Select noun stems needed to translate the Head of subject (S), primary object
(PO), or other relation from the Dictionary (or material provided).
If a noun stem ends in m, n, or s, check its plural form to see if the stem-final
consonant is a ‘permanent’ consonant or not (chapter 2, section B).
If you anticipate, or determine in a later step below, that a prefix will be needed
for the noun, return to the Dictionary to examine examples in the Dictionary
entry and make a note of the non-initial form of the stem (i.e., the form the
stem has when it is not at the beginning of the word).
Since English distinguishes only ‘near’ and ‘not-near,’ there will usually be
more than one Blackfoot demonstrative stem that is a correct choice, unless the
sentence being translated is in context.
3. Select the verb stem from the Dictionary (or from materials provided) which
most closely expresses the meaning of the English verb.
Be sure to get a stem with the correct transitivity and gender for its context
(chapter 7). Often the required stem will be listed only at the end of an entry as
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
162 Blackfoot Grammar
a related stem (Rel. stem). To reduce the need for pronouns (chapter 9), place
the verb first in the clause.
If a verb stem begins in i, check the future form in the Dictionary to see if the
stem-initial i is a ‘breaking i’ (section B of chapter 6).
(Advanced: See chapter 18 if a derived verb stem using one of the concrete
finals (Causative, Benefactive, Reflexive, Reciprocal, Accompaniment,
Transformative, or one of the Denominalizers) is called for.)
4. Add ‘preverbal’ elements to the verb stem as appropriate for the meaning (e.g.,
(i)maat- ‘negative,’ ohkott- ‘able,’ iiht- ~ oht- ~ omoht- ‘means/source’) (chapter
16).
5. Add tense or aspect prefixes as required to match the meaning of the English
sentence as closely as possible (chapter 6).
This includes: using ákaa- ~ Ikaa- ‘perfective’ if the English verb phrase
includes a form of have as auxiliary verb; using áak- ‘future’ if English uses
will as an auxiliary verb; and using á- ‘durative’ if an event or process is
viewed as ongoing (usually progressive or repetitive). Durative is seldom used
with verbs that describe states.
Rule of thumb: Most body part and relational stems take the short person
prefixes. (Remember: The short prefix for ‘3’ is w- ~ m-, the latter before a .)
Rule of thumb: Most simplex verb stems take the long person prefixes. (But
remember that the perfective prefix takes the short person prefixes.)
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
Chapter 23: Translating from English to Blackfoot 163
11. Apply allomorphy and phonological rules (chapter 15 and Appendix B).
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
CHAPTER 24
Stating quantities of items is done by use of intransitive verbs. Here again, there
are two types of intransitive verbs, depending upon the grammatical gender of
the subject. For naming integers, the II stem alone is used. Here are the II and AI
stems for ‘be 1’ to ‘be 10’:1
integer II stem AI Stem
1 ni’tókska ni’tókskaM:
2 nááto’ka nááto’kaM:
3 niiwókska niiwókskaM:
4 niisó niisoyím
5 nisitó nisitsí
6 náao náai
7 ihkitsíka ihkitsíkaM:
8 náániso náánisoyim
9 piihkssó piihkssí
10 kiipó kiip
Notice that members of each pair share a common root. To these verb stems will
be added the usual verb affixes. So in independent clauses, the verbs for ‘be one’
will have suffix wa (unless the subject is minor third person) and those for the
others will have suffix yi. Here are some examples:
1
There are obsolescing, alternate forms for the first four II stems which can be used in enumerating.
They are nisí, nátohka, ni(iy)ó’ka, and nisó.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
Chapter 24: Numbers and Enumeration 165
Like most other morphemes of Blackfoot, the numeral roots have a different
shape when not in word-initial position. Here are the initial and non-initial forms
of the roots of the stems listed above:
1 ni’tókska ~ i’tókska
2 nááto’ka ~ istó’ka
3 niiwókska ~ iiwókska
4 niisó ~ iisó
5 nisit(o) ~ isit(o)
6 náa ~ áa
7 ihkitsík ~ ohkitsík(a)
8 náániso ~ áániso
9 piihkssí ~ Ipiihkssí
10 kiip ~ ipp
2
Note that the verbs ‘eat,’ ‘buy,’ and ‘shoot’ in (g)–(i) are intransitive, so any noun as Head of
the object would have to be non-referring (see section D of chapter 7). But the suffix on the nouns in
(g)–(i) has the underlying shape -yi rather than -i, and I don’t know how to gloss it. It can’t be the ‘3p’
verbal suffix, for it is used in (i) where only one dress is referred to. My current hypothesis is that the
-yi in these cases is an existential suffix.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
166 Blackfoot Grammar
Ordinals
Though some forms are problematical,3 the numeral roots are used to form the
closest equivalent to English ordinals. Here are some examples:
(j) Omohtsistó’kaahpi iihtó’tai’piwa. ‘He came in second.’
(k) Omohtsóókskááhpi iihtó’tai’piwa. ‘He came in third.’
(l) Omohtsisóóhpi nómohto’tai’pi ‘I came in fourth.’
(m) Omohtsisitóóhpi kómohto’tai’pi ‘You came in fifth.’
(n) Omohtohkitsikaahpi iihtó’tai’piwa. ‘He came in seventh.’
(o) Omohtanisoohpi iihtó’tai’piwa. ‘He came in eighth.’
There is an alternate strategy for ordinals in which the numerals are used with a
suffix i:
(p) Niisóí nómohto’tai’pi. ‘I came in fourth.’
(q) Nááoi iihtó’tai’piwa. ‘He came in sixth.’
There are also prefix forms of numbers (called ‘adjuncts’ in the Dictionary), some
of which are identical, or nearly identical, to the roots of the numeral verbs. Here
they are, listed in both their initial and non-initial forms:
1 ni’t- ~ i’t-
2 naat- ~ ist-
3 nii. ~ ii.-4
4 niis- ~ iis-
5 nisit- ~ isit-
6 náa- ~ áa-
7 ihkitsiki- ~ ohkitsiki-
8 naanisi- ~ aanisí-
9 piihkssí- ~ Ipiihkssí-
10 kiip- ~ ipp-
3
Note that the last vowel of the roots is lengthened. The form for ‘third’ is puzzling, as there is no
vestige of the w from the root.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
Chapter 24: Numbers and Enumeration 167
These prefix forms are used in all numbers above 10, the formation of which
will be described below. They also function as quantifier prefixes in many other
complex verb stems, including those used to state numbers of people, years,
days, and dollars:
Where persons are being numbered, the numeral prefixes4 are used with the stem
itapi ‘be person(s).’ For example:
(r) náátsitapiyi nóko’siksi ‘I have two kids.’
(s) náánisiitapiyaawa ‘There are eight persons.’
When numbering dollars, the numeral prefixes are used with ohtoo’p ‘cost’:5
(t) náaohtoo’pa ‘It cost six (dollars).’
When numbering years, the numeral prefixes are used with sstoyiimi ‘have
winters’:6
(u) ákaohkitsikisstoyiimiwa anna nitána
ákaa-ohkitsiki-sstoyiimi-wa ann-wa n-itán-wa
perf-seven-have^years-3s that-3s 1-daughter-3s
‘My daughter is seven.’
To form a noun numbering days, the numeral prefixes are attached to iksistsiko
‘day’ :
(w) niisóíksistsikoyi ‘four days’
4
With itapi the verb root for three is used instead of the prefix: nii(w)ókskaitapiyaaw ‘there are
three persons.’
5
With this stem, both two and three are expressed by the numeral roots rather than the prefixes.
6
With this stem also, both two and three are expressed by the numeral roots rather than the pre-
fixes.
7
With this stem, one, two, and three are expressed by the numeral roots rather than the prefixes.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
Blackfoot Grammar
Here is an example of what I called the numeral stem for ‘two’ as part of a complex
verb stem:
(x) nitsíísto’kiisoka’sskaa ‘I acquired two dresses.’
nit-PST-isto’ki-soka’si-hkaa
1-PST-two-dress-acquire(AI)
Multiples of ten (decades) are made up of the numeral prefixes plus the non-initial
numeral root ipp ‘ten’: Here are the decades from twenty to one hundred; I will
give the II stem, which as stated above, is the form used as the name of a number:
20 náátsippo
30 niiyíppo
40 niisíppo
50 nisitsíppo
60 náaippo
70 ihkitsíppo
80 náánisippo
90 piihkssíppo
100 kiipíppo
Numbers between the decades are expressed by the name of the decade followed
by a numeral prefix attached to stem ikópoto, which must mean something like
‘more than the decade.’8 Here are the words for eleven through nineteen:
11 (kiipó) nii’tsikópoto
12 (kiipó) náátsikopoto
13 (kiipó) niiyíkopoto
14 (kiipó) niisíkopoto
15 (kiipó) nisitsíkopoto
16 (kiipó) náaikopoto
17 (kiipó) ihkitsíkiikopoto
18 (kiipó) náánisiikopoto
19 (kiipó) piihkssííkopoto
8
This stem seems to have a long t in the Siksiká and Amsskáápipikani dialects.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
169
The kiipo is in parentheses because it is rarely used with the ikopoto forms; i.e., if
ikopoto forms are not preceded by another of the decades, it is assumed that they
are between ten and twenty.
One can now easily construct the numbers between the other decades; just use
the decade followed by the ikopoto forms. Here are some examples:
21 náátsippo nii’tsikópoto
35 niiyíppo nisitsíkopoto
87 náánisippo ihkitsíkiikopoto
As described above, adding the -ikopoto forms to kiipíppo gives numbers between
100 and 110; thus, e.g., kiipíppo ihkitsíkiikopoto is the name of 107,9 kiipíppo
kiipó ihkitsíkiikopoto is the name of 117. Here are more examples of hundreds:
260 náátsikiipippo náaippo
754 ihkitsíkiipippo nisitsíppo niisíkopoto
The stem for ‘thousand’ is ómahksikiipíppo, literally ‘big 100.’ Here are some
examples:
1028 ómahksikiipíppo náátsippo náánisikopotto
1228 ómahksikiipippo náátsikiipippo náátsippo náánisikopoto
3462 niiwókskáómahksikiipíppo niisíkiipíppo náaippo náátsikopoto
9
However, some speakers use the single digit numbers after 100, which would give kiipíppo
ihkitsíka for 107. For these speakers, kiipíppo ihkitsíkiikopoto expresses 117 rather than 107.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
Appendix A: Verb Paradigms
Imperative -t -k
1
The 3 and 4 forms in Uhlenbeck (1938, p. 170) lack the aht portion of the suffixes shown here.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
171
Imperative -t -k
The 1 and 2 forms in the Independent add -wa if the object is singular or -yi if
the object is plural.
2
May be -’si after stems ending in i.
3
The 3 and 4 forms in Uhlenbeck (1938, pg. 170) lack the aht portion of the suffixes shown here
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
1p
3. TrANSITIVE ANIMATE VErB INDEPENDENT PArADIGM
PO → 1s 2s 2p 21 3s 3p 4s 4p 5
Subj.
→
kit- kit- nit- nit- nit- nit-
1s -o: -o:hpoaaw -a:wa -a:yi -a:yini -a:yi
kit- kit- nit- nit- nit- nit-
1p -o:hpinnaan -o:hpinnaan -a:nnaana -a:nnaani -a:nnaanini -a:nnaani
kit- kit- kit- kit- kit- kit-
2s -Oki -Okihpinnaan -a:wa -a:yi -a:yini -a:yi
kit- kit- kit- kit- kit- kit-
2p -Okihpoaaw -Okihpinnaan -a:waawa -a:waayi -a:waayini -a:waayi
Blackfoot Grammar
nit- nit- kit- kit- ot- ot-
4p -Oki -Okinnaani -Oki -Okoaayi -Okiyi -Oka -Okoaayi -yiiyi
ot- ot-
5 -Okini -Okoaayini
Note: In this and the following charts, ‘x’ in the subject column represents ‘unspecified’; see section D of chapters 10 and 12. See
section D of chapters 11 and 12 regarding realization of O. See section B of chapter 15 regarding variable length vowels a: and o:.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
4. TrANSITIVE ANIMATE VErB CONjuNCTIVE PArADIGM
PO → 1s 1p 2s 2p 21 3s/3p 4s 4p
Subj.
→
1s kit- kit- nit- nit- nit-
-o:hsi -o:hsoaayi -a:hsi -a:hsini -a:hsi
21
-a:hsi -a:hsini -a:hsi
Note: Stem-final t is dropped before TA Conjunctive suffixes which start with yss (all from yihs).
173
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
5. TrANSITIVE ANIMATE VErB SuBjuNCTIVE PArADIGM
PO → 1s 1p 2s 2p 21 3s 3p 4s/4p
Subj.
→
1s -iniki -inoainiki -a:iniki -a:iniki
21 -a:hki -a:hki
4s/4p
-Otsiiniki -Otsiinoainiki
Blackfoot Grammar
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
175
* This suffix has the form is only after a consonant; otherwise it is s, but requires
that the preceeding vowel be lengthened if not already long.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
Appendix B: Phonological Rules
1 GEMINATION C1 → C2 / _+ C2
where C1 and C2 are stops.
nitánIt + k + wa → nitánIkk + wa (8.,15.→ nitánikka) ‘He told me.’
2. s - INSERTION Ø → s / I_t
nitánItawa → nitánIstawa (8.→ nitánistawa) ‘I told him.’
3. x - SIBILATION h → ss / I_
ann+yIhka → annyIsska (8.,15.→ annísska) ‘that one4s(rel)’
Ihk + wa → Issk + wa (8.,15.→ ísska) ‘pail’
(cf. w + Ihk + yi 5.,15.→ óhki ‘his pail’)
4. s - CONNECTION a. Ø → s / C +_s
nit + siksipawa → nítssiksipawa ‘I bit him.’
nit + ssikópii → nítsssikópii ‘I rested.’
6. COALESCENCE wi(:) → o
w + ínni → ónni ‘his father’
w + iihsíssi → ohsíssi ‘her younger sibling’
7. BREAKING k → ks / _I
áak + Ipiimma → áaksIpiimma (8.→ áaksipiimma) ‘She will enter.’
8. NEUTRALIZATION I → i
áaksIpiimma →áaksipiimma ‘She will enter.’
4
For many speakers (perhaps a large percentage), the o of this rule is deleted rather than being
replaced by a. The rule for such speakers is as follows: o → Ø / _+a
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
Appendix B: Phonological Rules 177
9. DESYLLABIFICATION { i → y, o → w } / V+_V
Constraint: the i and o are unaccented
kitsí’powata + oaawa → kitsí’powatawaawa
‘You2p spoke harshly of/to him.’
(á + Io’kaa + wa 8.→) áio’kaawa → áyo’kaawa ‘She sleeps.’
5
For some speakers, i-Loss is accompanied by lengthening of the preceding V if that V is also
an i; e.g., áókstaki+yi+aawa → áókstakiiyaawa.
6
For a large sub-dialect on the Blood Reserve, this process is generalized to the following:
ih → s, and iihs → is.
At the other extreme, there are also a few speakers for whom Presibilation is not applicable at
all in careful speech.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
178 Blackfoot Grammar
18. POSTSIBILATION ih → s / s_
nitáókska’si + hpinnaan → nitáókska’sspinnaan ‘We1p run.’
19. t - AFFRICATION t → ts / _i
nit + it + itsiniki → nitsítsitsiniki ‘Then I told a story.’
7
Some speakers maintain the first y, at least in careful speech, so it is generally indicated in
written Blackfoot materials, including the examples in this book.
8
In place of this rule, some speakers have the following rule: ’ → Ø / _h. For such speakers,
‘Did he arrive from there?’ would be Kátaohto’toowa.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
Appendix B: Phonological Rules 179
V
26. ACCENT SPREAD V → [+accent] / [+accent] +_
á + okska’siwa → áókska’siwa ‘She runs.’
atsikí+ istsi → atsikíístsi ‘shoes’
(kakkóó + iksi 10.→) kakkó+iksi → kakkóíksi ‘pigeons’
INTERACTION CONSTRAINTS
Rules apply for maximal ‘feeding’ and minimal ‘bleeding’ except that:
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
Appendix C: The Sounds of Blackfoot
Here is an introduction to the sounds of Blackfoot for those wanting a bit more
technical phonetic description. So as to be of benefit to those without any
background in phonetics, it is framed in an introduction to speech sounds in
general.
Voicing
As air flows from the lungs to the mouth and nose, it passes through the larynx
(‘voice box’) where the glottis (‘vocal chords’) may be nearly closed and tensed
so that the cartilages at the opening vibrate, imposing an audio signal on the air
stream. Sounds made without this glottal vibration are said to be voiceless. A good
contrast between voiced and voiceless sounds in English is found in the pair lazy
and lacy. The z of lazy represents a voiced sound, while the c of lacy represents
a voiceless sound. There are no such contrasts in Blackfoot, but voicing is an
important feature nevertheless. (See Generalizations for Blackfoot, below.)
The shape of the oral cavity is also the determining factor for the quality of
semivowels. These are like vowels except for their duration and consequently
their position in the syllable: semivowels involve a gliding movement of the
tongue into and out of a high front or high back position. They are never the
nucleus of syllables, always occurring next to vowels. Blackfoot has a high front
semivowel [y] and a high back semivowel [w]. Like the back vowel [o], the lips
are rounded for [w].
The description of consonants makes reference to the point in the mouth where
the air flow is constricted, such as at the lips, or at various points along the roof
of the mouth as the tongue touches it. These points are sometimes referred to as
‘points of articulation.’ The important points for Blackfoot are the lips, alveolar
ridge (behind the teeth), the front portion of the palate, and the velum (‘soft
palate’). Consonants articulated at these points are described as labial, alveolar,
palatal, and velar, respectively.
Air flow in the mouth may be completely blocked, as in stops and nasals (see
below), or constricted to the extent that the air being forced through makes a
noise; the latter sounds are called fricatives. Vowels (see above) are produced
with virtually no constriction in the mouth.
The velic is a valve at the back of the roof of the mouth. It may be open, allowing
air to flow through the nasal passage, or closed.
Glottis Status
2. CLASSES OF CONSONANTS
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
182 Blackfoot Grammar
Stops
When there is complete blockage of air flow in the mouth and the velic is closed
so no air can escape through the nasal passage, as soon as the air pressure in the
mouth matches the air pressure from the lungs air flow completely stops. E.g., if
the lips are closed and the velic is closed, the air flow is halted as pressure builds
up behind the lips. The resulting consonant is called a labial stop. Blackfoot has
labial [p], alveolar [t], and velar [k] stops. A constriction at the glottis (represented
here as [ʔ]) is also considered a stop (glottal stop), even though the closure is not
in the mouth.
Nasals
If there is an oral closure but the velic remains open, then the entire air flow will
be via the nasal passage. The point of closure in the mouth is still significant,
however, because shape of the oral cavity will affect the quality (timbre) of the
sound as it does for vowels (see below), especially if they are voiced, as they
almost always are. Blackfoot has labial [m] and alveolar [n] nasals.
Fricatives
The oral closure is not complete, and air being forced through produces noise.
The velic is closed; otherwise the pressure in the mouth could not be great enough
to force air through the oral constriction. Blackfoot has an alveolar fricative [s],
similar to the sound represented by s in English horse. Blackfoot also has a velar
fricative [x]; it is about like the ‘gutteral’ sound usually represented by ch in
German.
Affricates
If the closure for a stop is not opened abruptly and completely, but rather the
closure is only partially opened so as to allow air to pass through with difficulty,
then the release will be heard as a fricative. The resulting complex sound is called
an affricate. Blackfoot has two affricates. One [ts] is at the alveolar ridge, and
sounds like the ts in the English word cats. The other affricate [ks] begins with a
velar closure, but during the release there is a partial closure at the alveolar ridge,
so that it sounds similar to the sound written x in box.
3. DEFINITIONS
stop = air flow blocked (glottal closure, or oral closure with velic closed).
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
Appendix C: The Sounds of Blackfoot 183
fricative = friction noise as air flows through a constriction and velic closed.
vowel = sound produced by resonance within the oral cavity; occurs as the
nucleus of a syllable.
semivowel = glide of tongue into a high front or back position; occurs as part
of a syllable margin.
Predictable Variation:
[æ] is higher and tense (like French é) when it precedes the glottal stop [ʔ],
higher and lax (like the e of English bet) before a long consonant, and long
otherwise.
[o] is usually higher and lax (like the vowel of English put) before a long
consonant.
[ɔ] is more clearly a diphthong (like ow in English cow) before a glottal stop.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
184 Blackfoot Grammar
Accent
Blackfoot has a non-predictable pitch accent. That is, every polysyllabic Blackfoot
word has at least one syllable with distinctively high pitch.
Vowel Length
Blackfoot vowels are either long or short, and this length is distinctive.
Consonant Length
All Blackfoot consonants except [x] and [ʔ] are either long or short, and this
length is distinctive.
There is much less aspiration, if any, of stops in Blackfoot, than there is with
English stops.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
Appendix D: Design of the Blackfoot Alphabet
Appendix C describes the distinctive sounds of Blackfoot and their variants. Here
we describe choices made in design of the alphabetic writing system, which was
made the official writing system of the Siksiká, Kainai, and Piikáni Reserves in
Canada in 1975. It uses only 13 letters, all of which are on standard keyboards.
These letters, combined with accenting or underlining of stressed vowels, represent
all and only those sound distinctions which are necessary to unambiguously spell
any Blackfoot word. It is important to note that while all of the letters used are
in the English alphabet, they don’t represent sounds that are exactly the same as
the English sounds that usually correspond to those letters. The number of letters
is based on an analysis of the Blackfoot sound system according to linguistic
principles; the particular shape of the letters was determined by two practical
considerations: ease of transfer of reading skills, for readers of Blackfoot, to
English, and vice-versa; and to simplify printing of materials in Blackfoot.
The letters chosen to represent the twelve distinctive consonants of Blackfoot are
all on every standard keyboard.
The choice to represent the nasal sounds [m] and [n] with m and n was made for
obvious reasons.
The choices made to symbolize other consonants were a bit less obvious, but
again there was an attempt to look for at least some similarity between Blackfoot
sounds and English sounds.
Because Blackfoot stops [p], [t], and [k] have the same points of articulation as
the English sounds most often represented by p, t, and k, respectively, the same
three letters were chosen for the Blackfoot alphabet.
s s
For the affricates [t ] and [k ], it might have been wise to choose a unitary symbol
for each of them, but for simplicity of representation these are spelled ts and ks ,
utilizing letters that are already part of the Blackfoot alphabet.
Because the Blackfoot alveolar fricative is similar to the English sound most
commonly represented by s, that letter was chosen for the Blackfoot consonant.
English has no velar fricative like Blackfoot [x], but since Blackfoot would
have no need for the letter h other than at the beginning of certain expletives,
and Blackfoot [x] occurs only after vowels, the letter h was chosen to represent
Blackfoot [x], even though there is very little similarity between Blackfoot [x]
and English sounds written with h.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
186 Blackfoot Grammar
For the glottal stop [ʔ], the letter ’ (apostrophe) was chosen, as it is not used
otherwise in Blackfoot writing.
For the semivowels [y] and [w], letters y and w were the obvious choices.
Deciding on what symbols to use for Blackfoot vowels was very difficult. Trying
to match vowels up with English letters is nearly impossible, because English
vowel letters do not even come close to consistently representing the distinctive
vowel sounds of English. For example, note the different sounds represented by o
in the following English words: no, on, of, woman, women, symbol. Consequently
we decided to stick with the phonetic symbols (used in Appendix C) for [i], [a],
and [o]:
For the low front vowel [æ] and low back vowel [ɔ], a different solution was
arrived at based on study of the grammar of Blackfoot. It was observed that
every time one expects the sequences ai or ao, based on parsing of words made
up of meaningful parts, we find instead [æ] or [ɔ], respectively. This calls for
interpretation of these two low vowels as sequences; accordingly, [æ] is spelled ai
and [ɔ] is spelled ao in the Blackfoot writing system, using vowel letters that are
needed independently.
Distinctively long consonants and long vowels are written double, e.g., mm, kk,
aa, ii.
Vowels with distinctively higher pitch (pitch accent) are written with an acute
accent over the vowel: í, á, ó.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
Appendix E: Ikasskini: Analyzed Blackfoot Text
Events described herein are said to have taken place in 1843. Story recorded
as told by Jack Bigeye of the Siksika reserve in 1965. Retold the same year by
Matthew ManyGuns after listening to the recording by JBE.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
188 Blackfoot Grammar
5 Sáakioohtá’pawaawahkaayiihka,
sáaki-ooht-á’p-a-waawahkaa-yiihk-wa [independent verb form]
still-along-PREF-dur-go-nar-3s
While he was still on his way,
9. Pinanístapaoot!”
pin-anistapa-oo-t
neg-aside-go-2s(imp)
Don’t step aside.”
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
Appendix E: Ikasskini: Analyzed Blackfoot Text 189
12. Nikááyiksisamáa’psskoaw.”
n-Ikaa-yik-Isamo-a’pssko-a:-wa
1-perf-very-long^time-chase-dir-3s
I’ve been chasing him a long time.” [‘rabbit’ prox.]
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
190 Blackfoot Grammar
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
Appendix E: Ikasskini: Analyzed Blackfoot Text 191
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
192 Blackfoot Grammar
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
Appendix E: Ikasskini: Analyzed Blackfoot Text 193
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
194 Blackfoot Grammar
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
Appendix E: Ikasskini: Analyzed Blackfoot Text 195
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
196 Blackfoot Grammar
56. Sotámattomatapóoyiihkiaaw, ki
sotam-att-omatap-oo-yiihk-yi-aawa ki
then-again-start-go-nar-3p-PRO &
máttsitomatánihkihtsimiihkiaaw íkasskini otsínihkssiistsi.
matt-it-omat-a-Inihkihtsi-m-yiihk-yi-aawa Íkasskini-yi ot-inihki-hsiN-istsi
again-then-start-dur-sing(TI)-theme-nar-3p-PRO Lowhorn-4s 3rd-sing-nom-in.p
So they went on their way, but again started singing Lowhorn’s songs.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
Appendix E: Ikasskini: Analyzed Blackfoot Text 197
58. Otsikáttakaístotookowááyiihkiaawayi.
ot-ik-átt-aka-ístoto-Ok-oaa-yiihk-yi-aaw-ayi
3rd-very-again-many-do^to-inv-3p-nar-3p-PRO-DTP
Very many of them were killed by him.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
references
Dunham, Joel. 2008. A unified analysis of the habitual and in-progress readings
of á in Blackfoot. Unpublished manuscript (Qualifying Paper), University of
British Columbia.
Fox, Jacinta, and D. Frantz. 1979. Blackfoot clitic pronouns. William Cowan, ed.,
Papers of the Tenth Algonquian Conference, 152-166. Ottawa.
Frantz, D. G., and Eugene Creighton. 1982. The indefinite possessor prefix
in Blackfoot. William Cowan, ed., Papers of the Thirteenth Algonquian
Conference, 137-142. Ottawa.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
199
Frantz, D. G., and Norma J. Russell. 1989. Blackfoot Dictionary of Stems, Roots,
and Affixes. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Frantz, D. G., and Norma J. Russell. 1995. Blackfoot Dictionary of Stems, Roots,
and Affixes. Second Edition. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Frantz, D. G., and Norma J. Russell. 2017. Blackfoot Dictionary of Stems, Roots
and Affixes. Third Edition. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Taylor, Allan R. 1978. Deictics in Algonkian. Ms. Paper read at 83rd annual
meeting of the American Anthropological Association, Los Angeles.
Thomson, Gregory. 1978. The origin of Blackfoot geminate stops and nasals. In
Eung-Do Cook and Jonathan Kaye, eds., Linguistic Studies of Native Canada,
[Link]: UBC Press.
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
INDEX
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
202 Blackfoot Grammar
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib
Index 203
[Link]/LinguaLIB
[Link]/lingualib