0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes) 339 views4 pagesFlat Slab Design Considerations
Considerations for flat slab design
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content,
claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
{International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 5, Issue 12, Decemnber-2014 39
ISSN 2229-5518
Design Considerations for Reinforced Concrete Flat Slab
Floor System
Harshal Deshpande’, Radhika Joshi?, Prashant Bangar*
"PG. student, Lect
“vil Engines
ing Department, Saraswati College of Engineering, Maharashtra, India,
shribarsh1If@[Link],
*Lecturer, Civil Enginecring Department, Saraswati College of Engineering,
Maharashtra, India,
radhikajoshi9[3@[Link].
Lecturer, C
il Engineering Department, §
xraswati College of Engineering, Maharashtra, Indi,
prashantb102@ [Link].
ABSTRACT
Flat slabs are highly versatile elements widely used in
construction, providing minimum depth, fast construction and
allowing flexible column grids. Common practice of design and
construction is to support the slabs by beams and support the
‘beams by columns. Here large Bending Moment & Shear Forces
are developed close tothe columns. These stresses brings about the
cracks in concrete & may provoke the failure of sab, thus there isa
need 1 provide & larger area atthe top of column recognized as
coli head. The puspose of this paper isto present the use of lat
plate‘lab construction in india followed by a review of design
‘methods for flat plateslab structure designs based on Indian
Standard 4562000{1] and American Concrete Institute
ACISI8(2}60des.
Keywords—flat slabs, flat plate floors, 15. codes, post
tensioned slabs
1 INTRODUCTION
A flat slab consists of a reinforced concrete slab that is
directly supported by conerete columns. C.A.P. Turner
constructed flat slabs in U.S.A. in 1906 mainly by conesptual
ideas, which was the origin of this type of construction. Later
in 1914, Nicholas proposed a method of analysis of flat slabs
based on simple statics, This method is used even today for
the design of flat slabs and flat plates and is known as the
direct design method. Structural engineers commonly use the
‘equivalent frame method wath equivalent beams such as the
‘one proposed by Jacob S. Grossman in practical engineering
for the analysis of flat plate structures. They are generally
employed for architectural reasons for large rooms such as
auditoriums, vestibules, theatre halls, show rooms of shops
‘where column free space is often the main requirement. Flat
slabs are used mainly in office buildings due to reduced
formwork cost, fast excavation, and easy installation. Many
‘works and studies have been carried out on flat slabs and yet
for Indian constructions the more refined works are needed
by the researchers. Flat slabs are basically used for
introducing more head rooms to the floors and to give better
appearances for interiors, Major components of fat slab are
capital/head, drop panel, coluinns strip and middle strips.
sno.1 general view of flat slabs
Per
Arr
Fig 2: Typical fat slab floor
Architectural demands for better illumination, lesser
fire resistance of sharp comers present in the form of
‘beams & increase in the formwork cost, optimum use of
space leads to the new concept in the field of structural
‘engineering as Reinforced concrete fat slabs.
ig 3: Aesthetic appearance of fat slab floor
ILLITERATURE REVIEW
Mostly among all available literature and experimental work
is based on the analytical parts of flat slab floors Seismic
response of flat slab building has been a subject of discussion
since many decades, A lot of research work has taken place in
this field addressing all relevant issues pertaining to the
modeling, analysis and construction of flat slab structures,
Park ef al. (2008) found that Equivalent Frame method is
uot appropriate in accurately predicting the respouse of
two-way slab systems under lateral loads. Currently design{International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 5, Issue 12, Decemnber-2014
ISSN 2229-5518
code, ACI 318-05)2.1] permit the EFM for the analysis of
two-way slab system under gravity loads and lateral loads
such as seismic loads
Subramanian (2005) found that to increase the punching
shear strength of fat slab, the shear reinforcement is found to
provide economical solution. They not only enhance the
shear capacity but also result in flexural failure ofthe slab
and thus increasing the ducilty of flat slab, which is very
important in earthquake prone zone
‘Meghally and Ghali 2005) have proposed the value ofthe
‘unbalanced moment tobe used in punching shear deste.
Kim and Lee (2005) proposed an improved analytical
‘method that can consider the stiffness degradation effects in
the slab depending on the lateral drifts using super element
for the efficient and accurate analysis of flat slab structure.
‘The major observations and findings could be summarized as
follows.
‘Structural analysis of the flat slab structure having irregular
plan or slab with openings can be performed and stress
distribution of floor slab can be easily represented by finite
element method if the stiffness degradation could be
considered properly
Corley and Jirsa (1970) first developed “Equivalent Frame
‘Method (EFM)” for design ofall ypes of slab system in 1970,
‘This methed had no limitation like direet design. method.
‘They compared the moment calculated by EFM with those
‘measured in fest slab and the moment shown the satisfactory
agreement, They provided thelist of constants for calculating
stiffness fixed end moments and carry aver Bictor fr hear
element
Dovich and Wight (2005) developed an effective slab width
model to describe the lateral behavior of the reinforced
cconerete flat slab frame with in a two dimensional non linear
Same analyeie
Hwang and Mochle (1993) carried out an experimental
study on nine pane! model having a slab supported without
beams, drop panels, slab shear reinforcement, A part of the
slab was designed for gravity and wind load in accordance
with ACI 318-83,
IIL, DESIGN OF THE FLAT SLAB STRUCTURES,
Classification of Flat Slab
a) Based on structural design
1, Conventional reinforced flat stabs and
2, Post tensioned flat slabs
b) Based on the components of slab
1, Slabs without drop and column head.
2, Slabs without drop and column with column head,
3, Slabs with drop and column head,
IS 456:2000 codal Recommendations for Proportioning
Flat Slab
1) Thickness of flat slab: ~The thickness of fat slab shall be
generally controlled by considerations of span to effective
depth ratio.
2) Drops: - The drops when provided shall be rectangular in
plan, and have a length in cach direction not less than one
third of the panel length in each direction, For exterior
pancls, with drops at right anglcs ta the nen continuous edge
IT, I
and measured from centre line of the columns shall be equal
‘o one half the width of drop for interior panels
Fig.3 connections of flat slab floor and column
Column heads: - When column heads are provided, that
portion of column head which lies within the largest circular
come or pyramid that has vertex, angle of 90 and can be
included entirely within the outlines of the column and the
coltumn head, shall be considered for design purposes.
The following is a discussion of the process of designing
flat plate/slabs to mest Indian codes. Limitations in the
Indian codes IS 456:2000 are overcome by utilizing
ACI-318. for Maintaining the Integrity of the Specifications
General Considerations for use of Flat slab Floor System
The following are the main factors to be considered before
adopting the use ofthe concrete flat plate with stecl/conerete
column system
1. Spacing of columns
2, Long term deflection of the flat plate
3, Punching shear checks at column areas.
Steps involved in the design of flat slab structures
1) Framing system
2) Enginesring analysis
3) Reinforcement design and detailing
Framing system
Initial framing system formulation provides a detailed
geometric description of the column spacing and overhang,
Architect provides this part of the design; the engineer
should emphasis on the following:
* Three continuous spans in each direction or have an
overhang least one-forth times adjacent span length in case
of only two continuous spans and{International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 5, Issue 12, Decemnber-2014
ISSN 2229-5518
‘© Typical panel must be rectangular and
‘© The spans must be similar in length i.e. adjacent span in
each direction must not differ in length by one-third
Engineering Analysis
Flat plateslab may be analyzed and designed by any method
as long as they satisfy the strength, stiffness and stability
requirements ofthe IS 456:2000 or ACI-318 codes. A typical
flat plate/slab can be analyzed by direct design method or
equivalent frame method as prescribed by the code
However, ifthe at platelslab isa typical one with unusual
geometry, with itregular column spacing, ot with big
opening then the designer can use finite element method
model analysis using various soft ware. The design of flat
slabs irespective ofthe methodology used must frst assume
41 minimum slab and drop thickness and a minimum column
dimension to ensure adequate stiffness of the system to
control deflection. The IS 456:2000 code is not clear on these
minimum conditions. However ACI specifies empirical
formulae to arrive at these minimums. Critical reactions for
the load combinations are used for the design of the
supporting columns and foundations.
Seismic Design of Flat Plate/Slab
Seismic design lateral force is based on the provisions of
Indian Standard IS 1893 (Criteria for Earthquake Resistant
Design of Structure), however of IS1¥5 1s not clear about 1.
Hence a designer, in addition may use, other codes like
‘UBC-2000 (Uniform Building Code) to design an effective
floor system. As per these codes a common practice is 10
derermine lateral force by considering ettner of static or a
dynamic procedure. In this paper seismic design is not
discussed
REINFORCEMENT DESIGN AND DETAILING
Reinforcement design Is one OF the erica parts oF Aa
plate/stab design: maximum forces from the analysis shall be
used in the design of the reinforcement,
Reinforcement required for flexure by using minimum
slab thickness pet table 1 typically will not sequite
compression reinforcement. The tension steel arca required
and detailing for appropriate strips can be as per IS 456:2000
or ACI-3I8, both being similar. However design for
punching shear force (including additional shear due to
‘unbalanced moment) per 1S 456:2000 is 32% conservative
compared to ACI-318, because Indian code underestimates,
the conerete two-way shear strength by 32% compared to
ACI. Design of Flat slab by Direct Design Method has some
restrictions that (a) It should have minimum three spans in
each ditection.(b) It must not have staggered column
orientation Hence many times Equivalent Frame Method is
adopted.
All the Negative & Positive moments are distributed in the
column strips & Middle strips respectively using equivalent
codes. IS 456-2000 gives Distribution of moments
o
across panels for Exterior and interior Slab .whereas ACI
318 also gives distribution table for moments. According 10
design considerations these codal provisions must be used,
IV, POST-TENSIONED FLAT PLATE/SLAB
Post-lensioned flat plat/slabs are a common variation
of the conventional plate structure where most of the
reinforcement is replaced by post-tensioned strands of
very high strength HYSD_ steel. The structural
advantage of post tensioning over conventional RCC is
that the slab is nearly crack- free at full service load.
Pictorially it can be shown as in the figure 4,
Fig.4 post tensioned flat slab
This leads toa smaller deflection compared to conventional
RCC because ofthe higher rigidity ofthe un-cracked section
Hence reduction in thickness of the slab compared 10
conventional RCC is the rationale for using post-tensioning
system for spans over 10m-and above. Further the lack of
cracking leads to a watertight structure. Flat plat/slab design
and build contractors in India claim a nearly 15t0 20%cost
reduction. But many practical considerations have shown
that theoretieat cost reduction 1s not possible practically
resulting in high cost of post tensioned flat slab
constructions
V. CONCLUSIONS
Flat plate/slab construction is a developing technology in
India Flat slabs has many advantages over conventional
slabs and hence it can be a very good option for modern
constructions demanding structural stability and state
of art aesthetic aspects and prospects. Flat plate/slab can
be designed and built either by conventional Rc. ot
post-tensioning. However, due to issues mentioned above
with post- tensioning construction in India and its higher
cost, conventional R.c design should be the preferred choice
for spans up fo 10 meters. Design of conventional Rec. flat
plate/slab in India, utilizing Indian codes, has many
shortcomings, which have (o be addressed and revised soon,
REFERENCES,
Guide 10 LongSpan Conese Flooes, Cement and Concrete
“Asocation of Ausali,International Journal of Scientific & Enginecring Research, Volume, Issue 12, Decomber 2014
ISSN 2229-5518
Gowda N Bhat, Gowda SB. Ravishankar; AV
CChandrashckar “Review and Design of Flat Plte'labs
(Const in Ini” 2002
> Strut Design Guide wo the ACI Building cod, hi ito, Van
‘Nostrand Reinold Company. New York 1985
> Indian Standard I 456:2000, Plain and Rsinfnoed Caerete Cd of
Practice.
> Punshothaman ¥., Reinoreod Concrete Srustral Elements, Ts
‘McGraw-Hill Publication Company Lid. New Delhi. 1984
> VergheseP.C. Advanced Renfree Concrete Design, Prentice Hall of
{Ui Privat Lid New Del. 2008,
> Note ue ACT 210-2000, Dulin Ck Regent For Renee
(Conccte, Poand comet association USA 2000,
> Stnuctural Design Guide othe ACI Duin code, Third ton, Van
‘Nostrand Reinhold Company. New York 1985
Kemth Leet and Dionisio Bema, Reinfnced Conerete Design,
‘hint eon, Mon ISA. 197
> Alas G.S. and Walter HD, Analysis and Dells of Renforead
(Concot Fat Slabs, Canaan Journal of Civil Eapiacorig.
Vo. 25.1998
> Nilson AH. and Walter DB. Deletion of Two-way Foor Stems
bythe Eivalet Frame Method, ACI Jour, Vol 72, No
is
Indian Standard 1S 1893 (Part 1) 2002, Cites for Bahuake
Resistant Design Sirti,
> Uniform Building Code, nerational Conference of Buildings
Officials, Cairn 2002