0% found this document useful (0 votes)
67 views5 pages

Enhancing Campus Interpersonal Relationships

This document discusses the importance of positive interpersonal relationships in educational settings. It makes three key points: 1) Positive relationships between teachers and students promote student success by providing security and motivation. Conflicts can negatively impact students. 2) School administrators should establish a shared vision and plan for nurturing positive relationships among all stakeholders. This includes modeling good relationship skills. 3) Tools like observation forms, surveys, and policy handbooks can help administrators document and improve interpersonal interactions on campus. The goal is an environment where students can thrive.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
67 views5 pages

Enhancing Campus Interpersonal Relationships

This document discusses the importance of positive interpersonal relationships in educational settings. It makes three key points: 1) Positive relationships between teachers and students promote student success by providing security and motivation. Conflicts can negatively impact students. 2) School administrators should establish a shared vision and plan for nurturing positive relationships among all stakeholders. This includes modeling good relationship skills. 3) Tools like observation forms, surveys, and policy handbooks can help administrators document and improve interpersonal interactions on campus. The goal is an environment where students can thrive.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

OpenStax-CNX module: m14428 1

The Importance of Interpersonal



Relationships

Mark J. Weber

This work is produced by OpenStax-CNX and licensed under the



Creative Commons Attribution License 2.0

Abstract
The goal of our lesson in this module is for you to become acquainted with the importance of es-
tablishing and maintaining a shared vision of positive professional interpersonal relationship practices
among all stakeholders on your campus. This module introduces the use of administrative tools designed
to help you document and measure progress toward the shared vision of establishing and maintaining
positive interpersonal relationships on your campus.

note: This module has been peer-reviewed, accepted, and sanctioned by the National Council of
the Professors of Educational Administration (NCPEA) as a scholarly contribution to the knowledge
base in educational administration.

Introduction
As an instructional leader, you realize how vital the interpersonal relationships between students and
teachers, teachers and other teachers, teachers and administrators, school sta personnel, parents, and
community members can be for creating a positive successful learning environment for all students. You
also realize how detrimental negativity can sometimes be to positive student progress. Our duty as school
administrators is to identify, encourage, and maintain behaviors that are associated with the modeling and
nurturing of interpersonal relationships that encourage student success. We also have the obligation to
identify, address, and change negative behaviors that inhibit positive student progress. Your ability as
a campus leader to weaken and eliminate negativity while nurturing and feeding the positive aspects of
interpersonal relationships requires that you have the knowledge and ability to plan for and implement the
intentional expectation of accentuating the positive for the good of all students.
What the Professionals Are Saying About Interpersonal Relationships at the Campus Level
Literature points to a strong link between positive nurturing interpersonal relationships between teachers
and students as an important ingredient in the recipe for student success. Socially supportive relationships
can have powerful and lasting eects on the lives of children (Cassidy & Shaver, 1999; Richman, Rosenfeld,

∗ Version 1.1: Apr 9, 2007 11:52 am -0500


† http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/

http://cnx.org/content/m14428/1.1/
OpenStax-CNX module: m14428 2

& Bowen, 1998). Pianta (1999) found that emotionally warm relationships between teachers and students
provide students with a sense of security within school settings. It is believed that this sense of wellness
promotes exploration and comfort, as well as social, emotional, and academic competence among students.
Similarly, Birch and Ladd (1997) found that students who had closer relationships with teachers were better
adjusted academically than students with conicted teacher-student relationships. Ryan and Grolnick (1986)
found that students who perceived their teachers as personally positive and supportive were more likely to
feel a greater sense of competence and to be more intrinsically motivated.
It is important to note that personality clashes between teachers and students can and do exist. Ridicule,
favoritism, exclusion, and deliberately demeaning behaviors exhibited by teachers toward certain students
can be a reality in some situations. It is in these types of situations that a savvy administrator must evaluate
the situation, devise a plan and make a change for the better when working closely with the student and
teacher, or other stakeholder involved.
Why is it Important to Develop a Plan for Establishing and Maintaining Positive Interpersonal Relation-
ship Practices on your Campus?
Successful educational leaders are successful planners. They have developed the ability to collaborate
with their leadership team, teaching sta, students, and parents including all stake holders associated with
the operation of a successful school. The planning process allows participants to become involved in the
implementation and completion of the plan and to have a voice in the decision making process thereby
empowering those who will be eected by the plan itself.
An eective campus principal is constantly involved in establishing and maintaining a professional envi-
ronment that includes the modeling of positive interpersonal relationship techniques. It becomes essential
for the eective instructional leader/principal to lead in establishing a vision for what positive interpersonal
relationships should look like and sound like whether the relationship is between teachers and students,
teachers and other teachers, teachers and parents, teachers and administrators. This includes all school
personnel and the community surrounding the campus.
An eective interpersonal communications plan may include measurable goals designed to meet the
expectations set forth in the vision that have been established collaboratively by campus personnel. For
instance, a vision statement may include the phrase similar to the following; It is essential that we establish
and maintain positive interpersonal relationships with all of the students, parents, teachers, administrators,
and other stakeholders we work with everyday while on this campus. We will do so by using the following
types of words and actions when working with each other. . .. Under this statement, the teachers and other
stakeholders will come to a consensus on what types of words and actions they agree will help to establish
and maintain a positive professional working environment. This (agreed upon by consensus) document can
become a written contract among the school personnel that all can sign in agreement. The contract can be
posted throughout the building and used as a reminder and tool for future situations that might call for
encouragement toward meeting the goals set forth in the vision for establishing and maintaining positive
interpersonal relationships.
Another evaluation tool administrators can use for measuring positive interaction between teachers and
students involves an administrative document used for tallying verbal and behavioral interactions teachers
have while communicating with students during a brief classroom walkthrough observation. The tally doc-
ument allows the administrator to document positive and negative teacher remarks and actions observed
during the walkthrough process. A post-observation meeting can become a useful tool for administrators as
they give feedback to teachers concerning the observed verbal and behavioral message they may be giving
to students and whether or not the teacher is aware of the connotations of the message they are projecting
to the students in their classroom.
A third useful informational feedback tool that can be used to measure interpersonal relationships involves
the distribution of surveys to students, teachers, and all stakeholders. The items on the survey can be written
in terms used to collect data pertaining to overall participant feelings toward their interpersonal relationships
at work. The survey respondents can remain anonymous in the hope of raising the level of honesty when
responding to the survey items answer choices.
Policies Concerning the Interpersonal Aspect of Professional Relationships at Work

http://cnx.org/content/m14428/1.1/
OpenStax-CNX module: m14428 3

All public school districts are required by law to have an employee handbook. The employee handbook
should contain federal, state and local policy regarding behavior toward students, peers and supervisors.
As a campus principal, you will be responsible for monitoring and enforcing the written policies. The
documentation tools mentioned above can be used to verify your leadership in establishing a vision for
establishing and maintaining a positive productive learning environment for all students. (You may choose
to have your students bring in an example of an employee handbook from a school district from which they
are employed and compare the contents and discuss the reasoning for included the contents).
Policy Examples
Policy DH (Example taken from a working 2006-2007 Employee Handbook of a Texas public school
district)
All employees are expected to work together in a cooperative spirit to serve the best interests of the
district and to be courteous to students, one another, and the public. Employees are expected to observe
the following standards of conduct:

• Recognize and respect the rights of students, parents, other employees, and members of the community.
• Maintain condentiality in all matters relating to students and coworkers.
• Report to work according to the assigned schedule.
• Notify their immediate supervisor in advance or as early as possible in the event that they must be
absent or late. Unauthorized absences, chronic absenteeism, tardiness, and failure to follow procedures
for reporting an absence may be cause for disciplinary action.

• Know and comply with department and district policies and procedures.
• Express concerns, complaints, or criticism through appropriate channels.
• Observe all safety rules and regulations and report injuries or unsafe conditions to a supervisor imme-
diately.
• Use district time, funds, and property for authorized district business and activities only.

All district employees should perform their duties in accordance with state and federal law, district poli-
cies and procedures, and ethical standards. Violation of policies, regulations, or guidelines may result in
disciplinary action, including termination. Alleged incidents of certain misconduct by educators, including
having a criminal record, must be reported to SBEC not later than the seventh day the superintendent rst
learns of the incident.
The Code of Ethics and Standard Practices for Texas Educators adopted by the State Board for Educator
Certication, which all district employees must adhere to, is reprinted below:
Cole of Ethics and Standard Practices for Texas Educators
Statement of Purpose
The Texas educator shall comply with standard practices and ethical conduct toward students, profes-
sional colleagues, school ocials, parents, and members of the community and shall safeguard academic
freedom. The Texas educator, in maintaining the dignity of the profession, shall respect and obey the law,
demonstrate personal integrity, and exemplify honesty. The Texas educator, in exemplifying ethical relations
with colleagues, shall extend just and equitable treatment to all members of the profession. The Texas edu-
cator, in accepting a position of public trust, shall measure success by the progress of each student toward
realization of his or her potential as an eective citizen. The Texas educator, in fullling responsibilities in
the community, shall cooperate with parents and others to improve the public schools of the community.
Professional Standards
1. Professional Ethical Conduct, Practices, and Performance
Standard 1.1 The educator shall not knowingly engage in deceptive practices regarding ocial policies of
the school district or educational institution.
Standard 1.2 The educator shall not knowingly misappropriate, divert, or use monies, personnel, property,
or equipment committed to his or her charge for personal gain or advantage.
Standard 1.3 The educator shall not submit fraudulent requests for reimbursement, expenses, or pay.

http://cnx.org/content/m14428/1.1/
OpenStax-CNX module: m14428 4

Standard 1.4 The educator shall not use institutional or professional privileges for personal or partisan
advantage.
Standard 1.5 The educator shall neither accept nor oer gratuities, gifts, or favors that impair professional
judgment or to obtain special advantage. This standard shall not restrict the acceptance of gifts or tokens
oered and accepted openly from students, parents, or other persons or organizations in recognition or
appreciation of service.
Standard 1.6 The educator shall not falsify records, or direct or coerce others to do so.
Standard 1.7 The educator shall comply with state regulations, written local school board policies, and
other applicable state and federal laws.
Standard 1.8 The educator shall apply for, accept, oer, or assign a position or a responsibility on the
basis of professional qualications.
2. Ethical Conduct toward Professional Colleagues
Standard 2.1 The educator shall not reveal condential health or personnel information concerning col-
leagues unless disclosure serves lawful professional purposes or is required by law.
Standard 2.2 The educator shall not harm others by knowingly making false statements about a colleague
or the school system.
Standard 2.3 The educator shall adhere to written local school board policies and state and federal laws
regarding the hiring, evaluation, and dismissal of personnel.
Standard 2.4 The educator shall not interfere with a colleague's exercise of political, professional, or
citizenship rights and responsibilities.
Standard 2.5 The educator shall not discriminate against or coerce a colleague on the basis of race, color,
religion, national origin, age, sex, disability, or family status.
Standard 2.6 The educator shall not use coercive means or promise of special treatment in order to
inuence professional decisions or colleagues.
Standard 2.7 The educator shall not retaliate against any individual who has led a complaint with the
SBEC under this chapter.
3. Ethical Conduct toward Students
Standard 3.1 The educator shall not reveal condential information concerning students unless disclosure
serves lawful professional purposes or is required by law.
Standard 3.2 The educator shall not knowingly treat a student in a manner that adversely aects the
student's learning, physical health, mental health, or safety.
Standard 3.3 The educator shall not deliberately or knowingly misrepresent facts regarding a student.
Standard 3.4 The educator shall not exclude a student from participation in a program, deny benets
to a student, or grant an advantage to a student on the basis of race, color, sex, disability, national origin,
religion, or family status.
Standard 3.5 The educator shall not engage in physical mistreatment of a student.
Standard 3.6 The educator shall not solicit or engage in sexual conduct or a romantic relationship with
a student.
Standard 3.7 The educator shall not furnish alcohol or illegal/unauthorized drugs to any student or
knowingly allow any student to consume alcohol or illegal/unauthorized drugs in the presence of the educator.
Conclusion
Think about the following:

1. Explain how your knowledge of interpersonal relationships can benet the students on your campus as
you plan to establish and maintain a positive learning environment for all students.
2. Explain how your knowledge of creating tools for collection of data pertaining to interpersonal rela-
tionships might be useful as you begin leading a school.
3. Would you ever use the written contract among the teaching sta and other personnel, the classroom
tally documentation tool, and survey instruments to help establish and maintain a positive learning
environment for all students? If so, what might these documents look like and how would you use the
information generated from each?

http://cnx.org/content/m14428/1.1/
OpenStax-CNX module: m14428 5

4. Explain how your knowledge of the types of interpersonal relationships between students and teachers;
teachers to teachers; teachers to parents; and all other campus stakeholders would change the way you
lead.

Resources:
Birch, S. H., & Ladd, G. W. (1997). The teacher-child relationship and children's early school adjustment.
Journal of School Psychology, 35, 61-79.
Cassidy, J. & Shaver, P.R. (1999). Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical implications.
New York: Guilford.
Pianta, R. C. (1999). Enhancing relationships between children and teachers. Washington, DC: American
Psychological Association.
Richman, J. M., Rosenfeld, L. B., & Bowen, G. L. (1998). Social support for adolescents at risk of school
failure. Social Work, 43, 309-323.
Ryan, R. M., & Grolnick, W. S. (1986). Origin and pawns in the classroom: Self-report and projective
assessments of individual dierences in children's perceptions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
50, 550-558.

http://cnx.org/content/m14428/1.1/

You might also like