IEOM Society International
The Fifth European Conference on
Industrial Engineering and Operations Management
Rome, Italy, July 26-28, 2022, Host: Sapienza – University of Rome
Certificate of Presentation
This is to certify that
Lucero Ixmatlahua López and Cuauhtémoc Sánchez Ramírez, Division of Research and Postgraduate
Studies, Tecnologico Nacional de México/Instituto Tecnologico de Orizaba, Orizaba, Veracruz, Mexico
Jorge Luis García Alcaraz, Department of Industrial Engineering and Manufacturing, Autonomous University of
Ciudad Juárez, Ciudad Juárez, Chihuahua, Mexico
Arturo Realyvazquez and Karina Cecilia Arredondo Soto, Departamento de Ingeniería Industrial,
Tecnológico Nacional de México/Instituto, Tecnológico de Tijuana, Tijuana, Baja California, Mexico
Yara Anahí Jiménez Nieto, Faculty of Accounting and Administration, Universidad Veracruzana Campus
Ixtaczoquitlán, Ixtaczoquitlán, Veracruz, Mexico
Delivered an Oral Presentation entitled “ID 144 Analysis of the Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Key Supply
Chain Processes Through System Dynamics.” at the 5th European IEOM Rome Conference.
Dr. Ahad Ali, Conference Co-Chair Prof. Don Reimer, Program Chair
Dr. Mario Fargnoli, Conference Chair Director of Membership of IEOM
Associate Professor and Director of IE
Associate Professor, Universitas Mercatorum,
Lawrence Tech University, Michigan, USA President, The Small Business
Rome, Itlay. Piazza Mattei, 10-00186 Roma, Italy
Executive Director, IEOM Society Strategy Group, Michigan, USA
IEOM Society International, 21411 Civic Center Dr., Suite # 205, Southfield, Michigan 48076, USA, www.ieomsociety.org
J
5TH EUROPEAN INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL
ENGINEERING AND OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT
ANALYSIS OF THE IMPACT OF COVID-19 PANDEMIC ON
KEY SUPPLY CHAIN PROCESSES THROUGH SYSTEM DYNAMICS
Lucero Ixmatlahua López
Cuauhtémoc Sánchez Ramírez
Jorge Luis García Alcaraz
Arturo Realyvazquez
Karina Cecilia Arredondo Soto
Yara Anahí Jiménez Nieto
5th European International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management
Rome, Italy, July 26-28, 2022
01. Introduction
02. Literature Review
03. Methodology
Content
04. Results and Discussion
05. Conclusions
06. Questions
5th European International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management
Rome, Italy, July 26-28, 2022
1. Introduction
December 2019,
Wuhan, China.
5th European International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management
Rome, Italy, July 26-28, 2022
Why has the pandemic had a different impact on the Supply Chain and
its logistics processes?
5th European International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management
Rome, Italy, July 26-28, 2022
Measures to control the disease
5th European International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management
Rome, Italy, July 26-28, 2022
Impacts on the Global Supply Chain and its
logistics processes
5th European International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management
Rome, Italy, July 26-28, 2022
2. Literature Review
❑ Supply Chain Risks
❑ Supply Chain and COVID-19
5th European International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management
Rome, Italy, July 26-28, 2022
3. Methodology
SYSTEM DYNAMICS
First phase: Conceptualization
Second phase: Formulation
First phase: Conceptualization
Third phase: Evaluation
Fourth phase: Implementation
5th European International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management
Rome, Italy, July 26-28, 2022
Identification of critical variables
Exogenous
❑ Vendor inventory
❑ Disruption days
❑ Covid-19 infections
❑ Employees reported sick Endogenous
❑ Demand fluctuation
❑ Support Provider Orders
❑ Backing Stock
❑ Schedule Working
❑ Production capacity
❑ Delivery time backing
5th European International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management
Rome, Italy, July 26-28, 2022
4. Results and
Discussion
5th European International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management
Rome, Italy, July 26-28, 2022
Description of main loops
Supply Process
Subsystem COVID-19
VENDOR
+ + INVENTORY
MATERIALS
COVID-19 CONFINEMENT AVAILABILITY -
INFECTIONS DAYS SUPPORT
- PROVIDER
ORDERS
ORDER
PROVIDERS
RAW
RAW MATERIAL SUPPLIER
MATERIAL INVENTORY´S LOT SIZE
INVENTORY DESIRED LEVEL -
5th European International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management
Rome, Italy, July 26-28, 2022
Description of main loops
Distribution Process
Production Process
-
+
RAW PRODUCTION
MATERIAL LINE CUSTOMER CUSTOMER
INVENTORY SHIPMENTS DELIVERY
- TIME
-
-
DISRUPTION DAYS
5th European International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management
Rome, Italy, July 26-28, 2022
5. Conclusions and Future work
❑ 58 feedback loops were identified, of which 23 are reinforcing, and 35
are balancing.
❑ The main impacts of COVID-19 are observed in the companies'
personnel since this led to the limitation of the personnel available to
develop the key activities of the companies.
❑ Similarly, by closing their borders, different countries affected global
supply chains, limiting orders' receipt, directly impacting production
and distribution processes.
❑ Future work: Development of model in Stella Architect® software.
5th European International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management
Rome, Italy, July 26-28, 2022
REFERENCES
❑ Abhishek, V. B., Gupta, P., Kaushik, M., Kishore, A., Kumar, R., Sharma, A., & Verma, S. (2020). India’s Food System in the Time
of COVID-19. Economical &Political Weekly, 55(15). https://www.epw.in/journal/2020/15/commentary/indias-food-system-
time-covid-19.html
❑ Al-Rohaimi, A. H., & Otaibi, F. Al. (2020). Novel SARS-CoV-2 outbreak and COVID19 disease; a systemic review on the global
pandemic. Genes & Diseases, 7(4), 491–501. doi.org/10.1016/j.gendis.2020.06.004
❑ Cedillo Campos, M. G., & Sánchez Ramírez, C. (2008). Análisis Dinámico de Sistemas Industriales (Primera). Trillas.
❑ Chowdhury, M. M. H., & Quaddus, M. (2016). Supply Chain readiness, response and recovery for resilience. Supply Chain
Management: An International Journal, 21(6), 709–731. doi.org/10.1108/SCM-12-2015-0463
❑ Chowdhury, P., Paul, S. K., Kaisar, S., & Moktadir, M. A. (2021). COVID-19 pandemic related Supply Chain studies: A systematic
review. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 148, 102271. doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2021.102271
❑ Deaton, B. J., & Deaton, B. J. (2020). Food security and Canada’s agricultural system challenged byCOVID-19. Canadian Journal
Of Agricultural Economics, 68, 143–149. doi.org/10.1111/cjag.12227
❑ Gunessee, S., & Subramanian, N. (2020). Ambiguity and its coping mechanisms in Supply Chains lessons from the Covid-19
pandemic and natural disasters. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 40(7/8), 1201–1223.
doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-07-2019-0530
❑ Heckmann, I., Comes, T., & Nickel, S. (2015). A Critical Review on Supply Chain Risk – Definition, Measure and Modeling.
Omega, 52, 119–132. doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2014.10.004
❑ Hobbs, J. E. (2020). Food Supply Chains during the COVID-19 pandemic. Canadian Journal Of Agricultural Economics, 68, 171–
176. doi.org/10.1111/cjag.12237
5th European International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management
Rome, Italy, July 26-28, 2022
REFERENCES
❑ Ivanov, D. (2021). Introduction to Supply Chain Recilience: Management, Modelling, Technology. In Springer. Springer.
doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70490-2
❑ Kontogiannis, T. (2021). A qualitative model of patterns of resilience and vulnerability in responding to a pandemic outbreak
with system dynamics. Safety Science, 134, 105077. doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.105077
❑ Osorio, C. J., Manotas, F. D., & Rivera, L. (2017). Priorización de Riesgos Operacionales para un Proveedor de Tercera Parte
Logística - 3PL. Información Tecnológica, 28(4), 135–144. doi.org/10.4067/S0718-07642017000400016
❑ Paul, S. K., & Chowdhury, P. (2020). Strategies for Managing the Impacts of Disruptions During COVID-19: an Example of Toilet
Paper. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 21(3), 283–293. doi.org/10.1007/s40171-020-00248-4
❑ Paul, S. K., & Chowdhury, P. (2021). A production recovery plan in manufacturing Supply Chains for a high-demand item during
COVID-19. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 51(2), 104–125. doi.org/10.1108/IJPDLM-
04-2020-0127
❑ Pongutta, S., Kantamaturapoj, K., Phakdeesettakun, K., & Phonsuk, P. (2021). The social impact of the COVID-19 outbreak on
urban slums and the response of civil society organisations: A case study in Bangkok, Thailand. 7(5), e07161.
doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07161
❑ Ponomarov, S. Y., & Holcomb, M. C. (2009). Understanding the concept of Supply Chain resilience. International Journal of
Logistics Management, 20(1), 124–143. doi.org/10.1108/09574090910954873
❑ Sawik, T. (2022). Stochastic optimization of Supply Chain resilience under ripple effect: A COVID-19 pandemic related study.
Omega, 109, 102596. doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2022.102596
❑ Thompson, L. (2003). Inicio de una nueva epidemia, SARS. Revista Médica Herediana, 14(2), 49–50.
http://www.scielo.org.pe/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1018-130X2003000200001
❑ Yuen, K. F., Wang, X., Ma, F., & X. Li, K. (2020). The Psychological Causes of Panic Buying Following a Health Crisis.
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(10), 3513. doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17103513
5th European International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management
Rome, Italy, July 26-28, 2022
Thank you for
Your
attention!
Questions?
