ANTENNA BASICS

FOR BEGINNERS
INTRODUCTION

VERTICALS

MULTIBAND VERTICALS

DIPOLES

MULTIBAND DIPOLES

RF CHOKES
1
 HOW DO ANTENNAS WORK?
An Antenna Is A Basic Transducer
For transmitting, you generate an RF signal on a conductor.
-Electric fields arise from a voltage rapidly changing
-Magnetic fields arise from a current rapidly changing

Generally people don't think of radio-frequency radiation in terms of discrete

particles (oscillating electrons and photons) -they typically use the wave
model instead, as it's much easier to use.

An efficient resonant antenna (1/4 wavelength or longer) produces a large-

amplitude EM wave for a given feed power, and produces little heat. An
inefficient antenna produces a small-amplitude EM wave for the same feed
power, and converts most of the power into heat.

For receiving, the same resonance issues apply. It's just that when
receiving, the currents induced on the antenna by the passing EM field
cause a terminal voltage at the feedpoint of the antenna, which generates
a propagating signal down the coax to the receiver's input amplifier circuit.
2
 VERTICAL and HORIZONTAL POLARIZATION
The Electric field or E-plane determines
the polarization or orientation of the radio
wave.
For a vertically-polarized antenna, the E-
plane usually coincides with the vertical/
elevation plane.
For a horizontally-polarized antenna, the
E-plane usually coincides with the
horizontal/azimuth plane.

The Magnetizing field or H-plane lies at a

right angle to the E-plane.
For a vertically polarized antenna, the H-
plane usually coincides with the horizontal/
azimuth plane.
For a horizontally-polarized antenna,
the H-plane usually coincides with the
vertical/elevation plane.
3
 ANTENNA LENGTH
λ/2 (180°)
1 WL (meters) = 300 = Lambda (λ)
F MHz
λ/4 Antenna Length is usually
(90°)
described as wavelength (WL)
in meters or degrees:

90°
TIME
180°
Frequency Wavelength 360°
(MHz) (Meters) (Feet)
1.8 160 510
3.75 80/75 252 360 deg = Freq Length (ft)
5.36 60 175 deg ft
7.15 40 131
10.125 30 92.4 Example: 50 ft vertical used on 160 m
14.175 20 66
18.1 17 51.2 360 deg = 510 ft
21.225 15 44 deg 50 ft
24.9 12 37.6
28.5 10 33 360 X 50 / 510 = 34.6 degrees
52 6 18 4
 VERTICALS
Basic Vertical (Monopole) Radiation Resistance

Radiation Resistance (Rrad) is that

portion of the antenna input resistance
that radiates power.

Radiation Resistance =
Power radiated / input current squared
The other portions are ground loss and
antenna structure loss that dissipate
Feedpoint Radiation Resistance vs Degrees power as heat.
(Double for Dipole)

Example: 160 m 50 ft vertical = 34.6 deg = 6 Ohms

5
 VERTICALS
Ground Losses (Rgnd) and Current Flow

The further up the element the less

current flows (the voltage increases)

Thus, for less I2R ground losses (Rgnd), it’s

Important have more return paths near the
feedpoint

Feedpoint

Transceiver

North Texas soil conductivity is 30 mS/m

Poor soil conductivity is 10 mS / meter Soil – Ground Rod - Radials
Sea water conductivity is 5000 mS / meter
S = Siemens (MHOs outdated term)
6
 VERTICALS
Efficiency and SWR

Feedpoint Resistance (Rin) = Rrad + Rgnd + (RL + Rs) Rin – Feedpoint resistance
Rrad Rrad at resonance (Xc = XL or
Antenna Efficiency = OR
jX = 0)
Rin Rrad + Rgnd + (RL + Rs)
(measured with an MFJ)
Examples: 50 ft 160 m vertical with 4/8/16 radials
Rrad – Radiation resistance
6 Ohms 6 Ohms
Eff = = Rgnd – Ground resistance
6 + 20 + 4 Ohms 30 Ohms = 20%
RL – Loading resistance
6 + 15 + 4 Ohms = 25 Ohms = 24%
Rs – Structural resistance
6 + 10 + 4 Ohms = 20 Ohms = 30%

Rin Coax Z
SWR = or (use the larger number on top)
Coax Z Rin

SWR =
50-Ohm Dummy Load
= 1:1 SWR = 50-Ohm Coax = 1.66:1
50-Ohm Coax 30 Ohms Rin
50-Ohm Coax
SWR = = 2:1 SWR = 50-Ohm Coax = 2.5:1
25 Ohms Rin 20 Ohms7Rin
 VERTICALS
Actual HyGain 18HT Vertical Impedance Data MFJ 269 ANALYZER

IMPEDANCE Z Resistance R
Feedpoint Z = R +/-jX

3.835 MHz 1.22

Rs =41 Xs =. 5
50R
XL
1.22 41
0R

-50R Xc

Reactance jX

3.65 MHz 3.80 MHz 3.95 MHz

41 (Rin) – 28 (Rrad) = 13 (Rgnd + Rs) 28 (Rrad)/ 41 (Rin) = 68% Efficiency

8
 VERTICALS
Near Field is the area where Radiation Pattern Pseudo-Brewster Angle
the ultimate pattern is not fully (PBA): varies with the ground
formed, and E-H induction fields conductivity and dielectric
have a noticeable effect on constant.
forces we measure.
The vertically-polarized
Frensel Zone is the area reflected wave (from a flat
where the pattern is still being earth or water surface) is 90
formed. It may or may not degrees out of phase and
Pseudo-Brewster Angle is typically at
include E-H induction field the -4 dB point from “perfect” ground minimum amplitude with
areas. respect to the direct wave.

Simple verticals have the Above this angle, the reflected

Frensel zone extending out signal is in-phase with the
a few wavelengths. direct signal and augments it.
Physically large arrays almost Signal reflection at an in-phase point Below this angle, the reflected
always have large a Frensel (Augmentation) wave is between 90 to 180
zone. degrees out-of -phase with the
direct wave and reduces it.
Far Field is the area where
any change in distance results PBA is that angle at which the
in no noticeable change in Signal reflection at an out-of-phase direct wave reduces it.
pattern or impedance. point (Cancellation)
-Courtesy of Tom McDermott –N5EG
9
 DECIBELS

The decibel (dB) is a

logarithmic unit that indicates the
ratio of a physical quantity
(usually power) relative to a
specified reference level

The difference in decibels

between two power levels is
defined to be 10 log (P2/P1) dB
where the log is to base 10

Example: 100 W transmitter driving

a yagi antenna with 6 dB gain is equal
to a dipole with 400 W drive.

10
 VERTICALS
Basic Vertical (Monopole) Radiation Pattern

They say that verticals radiate equally poor in all directions

Not so fast.... Maybe so

on 20 through 10 meters

But for DXing,

160 through 40 meters

a vertical can do a good
job compared to a low
dipole -since it’s more
difficult to get a dipole
up at a good height.

Let’s analyze this

11
 VERTICALS
160 m Vertical with two 90 ft radials
Comparison between poor ground and good ground

3.7 dB
(For living in
Texas)

The unit of antenna gain is dBi. dBi means

"Isotropic", a perfect POINT SOURCE,
which radiates in a spherical manner. It is a
relative measurement

12
 VERTICALS
160 m Vertical with four 90 ft radials
Comparison between poor ground and good ground

-2.1 to -1.9 dBi

(.2 dB)

1.6 to 1.8 dBi

(.2 dB)

13
 VERTICALS
160 m Vertical with thirty-two radials

Comparison between 50 ft and 90 ft radials (Good Ground)

-.24 dB
(loss for short
Radials)

14
 VERTICALS
50 ft Shortened 160 m Verticals with 32 Radials
Comparison between Inductively (coil) baseloaded and centerloaded

+2.1 dB

Coil electrically
lengthens antenna
(loads)

15
 VERTICALS
50 ft Shortened 160 m Verticals with 32 Radials
Capacitive (Top Hat) Loaded
Capacitive loading
Electrically lengthens
antenna

16
 VERTICALS
Summary Between 50 ft Shortened 160 m Verticals
and Full-Size Vertical with 32 radials

Rad Eff Gain Loading

Base
Loaded 23.3% -1.5 dBi 40.7 W

Center
Loaded
37.3% 0.58 dBi 24 W

Top 41.8% 1.06 dBi ---

Loaded

Full
Size 45.6% 1.67 dBi ---

FS Sea 95.1% 4.92 dBi ---

Water

17
 VERTICALS
Comparison between 43 ft
and 50 ft matched base-
loaded verticals at 3.8 MHz 43 ft Vertical
Shown with base loading
43 ft -coil loss 6.2 W and 8
coil for 160 m and RF choke
radials is 22.9% efficiency

50 ft -3.7 W and 16 radials

is 33.9% efficiency

+2 dB

18
 VERTICALS
Comparison Between Three 10 m Verticals (Mininec Ground)
¼ Wave Groundplane
8 ft Above Ground ¾ Wave Vertical
1/4 Wave Vertical

-1.1 dBi
(.3 dB)
4.82 dBi
-1.4 dBi (6.2 dB)

19
 VERTICALS
L-C Trapped Multiband

40 m ¼ W
Capacity Loading (top hat)
-Electrically lengthens element
20 m Trap

20 m ¼ W Electrically
Add-on trap kits
Similar
Fixed coil with sliding rod
Patent No. 4 496 953 (Butternut)
15 m Trap
17 m Trap

15 m ¼ W

15 m
10 m Trap Trap
-An L-C resonant
circuit that acts as a
12 m
Hi-Z point to 10 m
Trap
10 m ¼ W
Adds inductive loading 10 m Trap
to the next bands
20
 VERTICALS
My 40/20/15/10 m 4-Band 29 ft Homebrew Vertical
Parallel Elements
40 m
Element

20 m Trap

15 m 10 m Element
Element

12 Radials
Separated for minimum
coupling and interaction

21
 VERTICALS
C ¼ W Decoupling Stub Multiband Capacity Loading
(top hat)
A Patent No. 2 535 298 –W J Lattin (1950)

40 m Loading
A ¼ wavelength trans- coil
mission line X velocity
B
factor is a resonant 20 m ¼ W
circuit which creates a with top hat

A B phase shift at which the

open end decouples
15 m Decoupling
VHF/UHF Collinear
that frequency from the Stub
(J-Pole Match) main element 10 m C
Decoupling
Stub
½W

A different connection
A A B
is possible -that is A to C.
B
This results in an insulator 15 m ¼ W
½W action or decoupling 10 m ¼ W

22
 VERTICALS
Electrical Ground Independent Multiband Antennas
Equivalent
40 m
20 m
Vertically Polarized
15 m
Loaded Dipole Capacity Hats
6m 10 m
Remember Hustler HF Mobile antennas?
Center 2m
This is basically what this design is Fed
-only mechanically mounted on a mast
Insulated
tubing
Just put to two of them back-to-back
and use three resonators and there
you have it
Balun/
Choke 40 m
-Narrow bandwidth and low efficiency Loading Coil
on 20 and 40 meters Coax

Mast

23
 VERTICALS
Top Fed Antennas -No Radials Counterpoise
80 m
model of
top fed 43 ft Vertical Coax Matching
vertical Network
Vs
Top Fed
15 ft to 10 m
base SURPRISE!
12 m

15m 17 m

Coax wrapped 20 ft
around 20 m
element to base

20 m

40 m

30 m

Choke

80 m Distance Above
Ground
24
 INVERTED-Ls and LONG WIRES
Similar to a Vertical –Have good efficiency due to long length
-Require similar matching –a remote tuner can be used

37 ft high X 90 ft long Full-size vertical Vs Inv-L comparison

40 m Pattern

10 m Pattern

25
 DIPOLES

80 m Inv-Vee Apex at 60 ft

6.25 dBi
1.95 dBi

Free Space

26
 DIPOLES
80 m Inv -Vee Height Compared to Full-Sized Vertical
Dipole Height

IN PH OUT-OF-PH IN PH OUT IN PH OUT-OF-PH

FRENSEL ZONE
1 WL High
Note: For illustration purposes only (240 ft Apex)

1/4 WL High
(60 ft Apex)

1/2 WL High
(120 ft Apex)

27
 DIPOLES
½-Wavelength Dipole Vs Inv-Vee

80 m Dipole BW 3.72 to 3.874 MHz

Z = 76 -j2.5
Eff = 84.7%
Fr = 3.8 MHz

BW 3.68 to 3.85 MHz

80 m Inv-V

Z = 64 +j0.5
Eff = 76%
Fr = 3.77 MHz

28
 LOOPS
66 ft X 66 ft X 25 ft High 80 m Horizontal Loop Antenna

Z = 76 +j4
Eff = 54.9%
Fres = 3.8 MHz

Near Vertical Incidence Skywave (NVIS)

29
 LOOPS
Roof Top 10 m Horizontal Loop Antenna

77.5 in. length of

75-Ohm coax Z = 76 -j2.5
to 50-Ohm Eff = 84.7%
Transformation
Fr = 28.5 MHz

Direct feed
75-Ohm coax
SWR curve

30
 MULTIBAND
Comparison Between ½ WL Trapped and Open-Wire Center fed Antennas

½ WAVE 130 ft (7 WL)

DIPOLE DIPOLE

Each 10 m antenna at 35 ft

Trapped Center Fed

Coax feedline
(Narrower BW and Open feedline
fewer bands) and Tuner
31
 MULTIBAND
Parallel (Fan) Multiband Antenna

Modeling shows extreme With more spacing, modeling

difficulty tuning –especially shows easier tuning and better
on 15 m SWR when more bands are added
-I’ve had good luck with two
bands (80 and 40 m) I think this is a Morgan Trap
(H K Morgan 1940 -CQ Mag Feb 1977)
-Requires calculations to
determine the value of coil XL
Alpha-Delta Fan/Trapped Dipole
F1 (20 m) + XL + Wire = F2 (40 m)

32
 MULTIBAND
80 – 10 m W8NX 5-Band Dipole Antenna –My Choice

-Coax fed – SWR below 3:1 on all bands

-No external tuner required
-40 m trap and 20/15/10 m stubs
-Full-sized performance 80/40 m
-20, 15, and 10 m have multiple lobes

33
 MULTIBAND
Off-Center-Feed and Windom Antennas

45’ 4” 90’ 8”
-Requires a Tuner
-High bands have multiple
lobes
TUNER 4:1 balun below 50 ft
6:1 balun above 50 ft

34
 MULTIBAND
G5RV Antenna

80 40 20 30 15 12 10
SWR 2.71 4.1 1.9 Hi 5.5 2.6 Hi
W8JI Design

Tuner

35
 MULTIBAND
Decoupling Stub Multiband Dipole
Lattin Dipole -W4JRW

10/20/40 Meter Short Dipole Using 300-Ohm Twinlead

40 m 20 m 10 m 8 ft 6 ft 11 in 13 ft 10 in

Coax Feedline
Acts as linear loading on 40 m 80 m addition 27 ft 5 in
or a ¼ W stub for 20 m (if desired)

A Future Antenna Project

36
 RF CHOKES
DIFFERENTIAL MODE
CURRENT Why Use a Choke?
-Isolate antenna from feed line
COMMON MODE -Reduce noise
CURRENT
-Keep RF out of the shack

Power (and field) is

XCVR confined inside the coax

Common Mode power

(and field) is outside coax

20 to 10 m Yagi Choke
CHOKE
BOOM

Acts like an egg insulator Coax

CHOKE
Six turns on 4” PVC sewer pipe attached away
from the boom to prevent coupling via the
XCVR
boom (12 turns for 40 to 30 m)

37
 RF CHOKES

Data from K9YC’s webpage:

http://audiosystemsgroup.com/
NCDXACoaxChokesPPT.pdf

38
 Thus, making sure that there are no
common mode currents present is
Ladder Line
RF CHOKES the key objective, both to minimize
noise pickup and to make sure that
Wall there are no currents that could
couple into the house wall. The feed
line choke does that very well.
Antenna
Electrical Box Tuner

RG-213 Coax
Direct Connection PVC
Ferrite Choke

A resonant antenna will never have a feed

impedance of 400+j0. It will be a low
impedance near it's resonant, 3rd harmonic,
etc. On the even harmonics, it will have a high
impedance. Thus, the 400-Ohm ladder line
never shows an impedance anywhere close to
400 Ohms at the transmitter. Thus, a specific
impedance matching ratio is never correct.
That's why there's an antenna tuner inside the
shack - to match whatever impedance is seen
to the 50 Ohms that the transmitter wants.
-Courtesy of Tom McDermott –N5EG
39
THE END
K5QY

40