0% found this document useful (0 votes)
35 views21 pages

Exercise CH14

The document presents results from modeling volatility clustering in multiple time series related to foreign exchange rates and interest rates using ARCH and GARCH models. For each series, it performs tests for ARCH effects and estimates various ARCH and GARCH models to determine the best fitting model. The results show that all series exhibit volatility clustering and that GARCH(1,1) provides the best fit for modeling conditional variance in all cases.

Uploaded by

ynhinguyen610
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
35 views21 pages

Exercise CH14

The document presents results from modeling volatility clustering in multiple time series related to foreign exchange rates and interest rates using ARCH and GARCH models. For each series, it performs tests for ARCH effects and estimates various ARCH and GARCH models to determine the best fitting model. The results show that all series exhibit volatility clustering and that GARCH(1,1) provides the best fit for modeling conditional variance in all cases.

Uploaded by

ynhinguyen610
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Exercise 14.

1
f)
r_ftse
The results for a GARCH(1,1) model:

Comment: The estimate of δ and the coefficient of the γ 1term is significant and positive.

The results for a GARCH(6,6) model:

Comment: All the paramaters are insignificant. So, this is not an appropriate model

The results for a GARCH(1,2) model:


Comment: Only the ARCH(1) and the GARCH(1) terms is insignificant.
=> GARCH(1,1) is the most appropriate model.
r_stock1
The results for a GARCH(1,1) model:

Comment: The estimate of δ and the coefficient of the γ 1term is significant and positive

The results for a GARCH(1,2) model:

Comment: Only the ARCH(1) and the GARCH(1) terms is insignificant.


=> GARCH(1,1) is the most appropriate model.
r_stock2
The results for a GARCH(6,6) model:

Comment: Some of the ARCH lagged terms have a negative sign. It is not an appropriate
model.

The results for a GARCH(1,1) model:

Comment: The estimate of δ and the coefficient of the γ 1term is significant and positive.
GARCH(1,1) is the most appropriate model.
r_stock3
The results for a GARCH(6,6) model:

Comment: Some of the ARCH lagged terms have a negative sign. It is not an appropriate
model.
The results for a GARCH(1,2) model:

Comment: The coefficient of ARCH(2) have a negative sign. It is not an appropriate model.
The results for a GARCH(1,1) model:

Comment: The estimate of δ and the coefficient of the γ 1term is significant and positive
The results for a GARCH(2,2) model:

Comment: The coefficient of ARCH(2) and GARCH(2) have a negative sign. It is not an
appropriate model.
=> GARCH(1,1) is the most appropriate model.
g)
r_ftse
The results for a TGARCH(1,1) model:

Comment: The coefficient of TGARCH term is positive and statiscally significant.


=> There are asymmetrics effects. And bad news has larger effects on the volatility of the
series than good news.
r_stock1
The results for a TGARCH(1,1) model:

Comment: The coefficient of TGARCH term is negative and statiscally significant.


=> There are asymmetrics effects. And bad news has smaller effects on the volatility of the
series than good news.

r_stock2
The results for a TGARCH(1,1) model:

Comment: The coefficient of TGARCH term is positive and statiscally significant.


=> There are asymmetrics effects. And bad news has larger effects on the volatility of the
series than good news.
r_stock3
The results for a TGARCH(1,1) model:

Comment: The coefficient of TGARCH term is positive and statiscally significant.


=> There are asymmetrics effects. And bad news has larger effects on the volatility of the
series than good news.
h)
r_ftse
The results for a EGARCH(1,1) model:

Comment: The coefficient of the EGARCH is negative and statiscally significant.


=> For the ftse,p bad news has larger effects on the volatility of the series than good news.
r_stock1
The results for a EGARCH(1,1) model:

Comment: The coefficient of the EGARCH is possitive and statiscally significant.


=> For the stock1, bad news has smaller effects on the volatility of the series than good
news.

r_stock2
The results for a EGARCH(1,1) model:

Comment: The coefficient of the EGARCH is negative and statiscally significant.


=> For the stock2, bad news has larger effects on the volatility of the series than good news.
r_stock3
The results for a EGARCH(1,1) model:

Comment: The coefficient of the EGARCH is negative and statiscally significant.


=> For the stock3, bad news has larger effects on the volatility of the series than good news.

Exercise 14.3
a)
The dm series:

The bp series:
The cd series:

The dy series:

The sf series:
There are volatility clustering phenomenon in the graphs.
b)
DM
The results of an AR(1) model:

=> These results are no of interest in themselves.

Test for ARCH effects:


The T* R2 statistic = 19.09 and has a probability value of 0.000 => We reject H0 of
homoskedasticity. We conclude that ARCH(1) effects are presented.

Testing for higher order ARCH effects:

This time the T* R2 statistic is even higher (79.51), suggesting a massive rejection of H0.

Estimating ARCH models:

ARCH(6) is the most appropriate model.

BP
The results of an AR(1) model:

=> These results are no of interest in themselves.


Test for ARCH effects:

The T* R2 statistic = 58.91 and has a probability value of 0.000 => We reject H0 of
homoskedasticity. We conclude that ARCH(1) effects are presented.

Testing for higher order ARCH effects:

This time the T* R2 statistic is even higher (98.07), suggesting a massive rejection of H0.

Estimating ARCH models:

ARCH(6) is the most appropriate model.


CD
The results of an AR(1) model:

=> These results are no of interest in themselves.

Test for ARCH effects:

The T* R2 statistic = 84.2 and has a probability value of 0.000 => We reject H0 of
homoskedasticity. We conclude that ARCH(1) effects are presented.

Estimating ARCH models:

ARCH(5) is the most appropriate model.


DY
The results of an AR(1) model:

=> These results are no of interest in themselves.

Test for ARCH effects:

The T* R2 statistic = 16.17 and has a probability value of 0.000 => We reject H0 of
homoskedasticity. We conclude that ARCH(1) effects are presented.

Testing for higher order ARCH effects:

This time the T* R2 statistic is even higher (20.47), suggesting a massive rejection of H0.
Estimating ARCH models:

ARCH(6) is the most appropriate model.

SF
The results of an AR(1) model:

=> These results are no of interest in themselves.

Test for ARCH effects:

The T* R2 statistic = 16.17 and has a probability value of 0.000 => We reject H0 of
homoskedasticity. We conclude that ARCH(1) effects are presented.
Testing for higher order ARCH effects:

This time the T* R2 statistic is even higher (36.24), suggesting a massive rejection of H0.

Estimating ARCH models:

ARCH(6) is the most appropriate model.

c)
DM
The results for a GARCH(1,1) model:

Comment: The estimate of δ and the coefficient of the γ 1term is significant and positive.
GARCH(1,3):

Comment: Only the ARCH(1) and the GARCH(1) terms is insignificant.


=> GARCH(1,1) is the most appropriate model.
BP

=> GARCH(1,1) is the most appropriate model.

CD

=> GARCH(1,1) is the most appropriate model.

DY
=> GARCH(1,1) is the most appropriate model.
SF

=> GARCH(1,1) is the most appropriate model.

You might also like