0% found this document useful (0 votes)
44 views27 pages

Software Testing FInal Imp Topics

The document provides an overview of integration testing, describing its goals of identifying problems when components interact and validating system functionality and performance. It also outlines different integration testing types like top-down and bottom-up approaches.

Uploaded by

Pranav
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
44 views27 pages

Software Testing FInal Imp Topics

The document provides an overview of integration testing, describing its goals of identifying problems when components interact and validating system functionality and performance. It also outlines different integration testing types like top-down and bottom-up approaches.

Uploaded by

Pranav
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Integration Testing: A Brief Overview

Integration testing is a software testing technique that focuses on verifying the


interactions and data exchange between different components or modules of a software
application. It's considered the second level of testing, following unit testing.

Goals:

● Identify any problems or bugs that arise when different components interact.
● Validate that different components work together as a system to achieve desired
functionality and performance.
● Ensure smooth data flow between components.
● Detect interface compatibility issues.
● Find potential performance bottlenecks.

Types of Integration Testing:

● Top-down: Testing begins with higher-level modules and progresses down to


lower-level modules.
● Bottom-up: Testing starts with lower-level modules and progresses up to
higher-level modules.
● Big Bang: All modules are integrated and tested together at once.
● Sandwich: Combines top-down and bottom-up approaches, testing top and
bottom modules simultaneously.

Key Points:

● Performed after unit testing. Can be complex and time-consuming.


● Focuses on how components interact and exchange data.
● Helps detect interface compatibility issues and performance bottlenecks.
● Ensures the system functions as a whole. Requires a well-defined interface
between components.
Object-Oriented Testing: Key Points
Focus:
● Testing individual objects and their interactions in object-oriented software.
● Verifying object behavior, state, and relationships.
● Utilizing object-oriented features like encapsulation, inheritance, and
polymorphism.

Techniques:

● Unit testing: Testing individual objects in isolation.


● Integration testing: Testing interactions between objects.
● Class testing: Testing the functionality and behavior of a specific class.
● Inheritance testing: Testing inherited behavior & ensuring subclass functionality.
● Polymorphism testing: Testing different object behaviors based on their types.
● White-box testing: Analyzing internal object structure and code.
● Black-box testing: Testing objects based on their external behavior and
functionality.

Benefits:

● Early detection of object-oriented specific issues.


● Improved cohesion and reduced coupling between objects.
● Easier maintenance and modification of object-oriented software.
● Improved overall software quality and reliability.

Challenges:

● Complexities due to object interactions and inheritances.


● Difficulty in testing object state and behavior in isolation.
● Requires deeper understanding of object-oriented concepts.
Static vs. Dynamic Testing Tools: Key Points
Static Testing Tools:
● Focus: Analyzing code, requirements, and design documents without executing
the software.
● Goals: Identify syntax errors, logical errors, potential security vulnerabilities,
compliance issues, and coding style violations.
● Benefits:
○ Early defect detection and prevention.
○ Reduced testing time and cost.
○ Improved code quality and maintainability.

Dynamic Testing Tools:


● Focus: Executing the software and analyzing its behavior.
● Goals: Identify runtime bugs, performance issues, and user interface defects.
● Benefits:
○ More comprehensive testing of system functionality.
○ Simulates real-world user interactions.

Key Differences:

Feature Static Testing Dynamic Testing

Execution No code execution required Requires code execution

Focus Code structure and logic Runtime behavior and functionality

Benefits Early defect detection, Comprehensive testing, user


improved code quality experience evaluation
Risk Analysis: A Brief Overview
Risk analysis is a systematic process of identifying, assessing, and prioritizing potential
risks that may impact a project, organization, or activity. It involves evaluating the
likelihood of a risk occurring and its potential consequences.
Goals:
● Proactive identification and mitigation of potential risks.
● Informed decision-making based on risk assessment.
● Improved project planning and resource allocation.
● Reduced uncertainty and increased risk preparedness.
● Enhanced project success rate and risk management.

Steps in Risk Analysis:

1. Risk identification
2. Risk assessment
3. Risk prioritization
4. Risk mitigation
5. Risk monitoring and review

Types of Risk:

● Strategic risks: Risks related to the overall direction and goals of the
organization.
● Operational risks: Risks related to the day-to-day operations of the organization.
● Project-specific risks: Risks unique to a specific project or activity.
● Financial risks: Risks related to the financial health of the organization.
● Compliance risks: Risks related to adhering to laws and regulations.

Benefits of Risk Analysis:

● Improved decision-making & Increased risk preparedness


● Reduced uncertainty & Enhanced project success rate.
Slice Testing: A Brief Overview
Slice testing is a technique used in software testing to focus on specific sections of code
(slices) based on a particular point of interest (POI). This allows testers to efficiently and
effectively test the specific part of the code responsible for the POI and identify
underlying issues.
Goals:
● Isolate and test specific sections of code relevant to a particular functionality or
defect.
● Reduce testing time and effort by focusing on critical areas.
● Improve test case design by targeting specific program segments.
● Enhance debugging efficiency by pinpointing the root cause of errors.

Types of Slicing:

● Static slicing: Analyzes the code without execution to identify all statements that
may affect the POI.
● Dynamic slicing: Analyzes the code during execution to identify statements that
actually affect the POI for a specific input.

Steps in Slice Testing:

1. Identify the Point of Interest (POI)


2. Choose a slicing technique
3. Extract the slice
4. Design test cases
5. Execute test cases

Benefits of Slice Testing:

● Reduced testing time and effort. More focused and targeted testing.
● Improved test case design and efficiency.
● Enhanced debugging capabilities. Better understanding of program behavior.
System Testing: A Brief Overview

System testing is a software testing process that evaluates the functionality and
performance of an entire integrated system. It focuses on verifying that all the
components work together as a whole and meet the specified requirements.
Goals:

● Ensure the system meets functional and non-functional requirements.


● Identify compatibility issues between components.
● Evaluate system performance under various loads.
● Verify user interface and usability.
● Detect security vulnerabilities.

Types of System Testing:

● Black-box testing: Testing the system without knowledge of its internal structure.
● White-box testing: Testing the system with knowledge of its internal structure or
code.
● Non-functional testing: Testing performance, security, usability, and other
non-functional aspects of the system.
● Regression testing: Testing previously tested functionality after changes are
made to the system.

Steps in System Testing:

1. Define test plan and scope


2. Design test cases
3. Set up test environment
4. Execute test cases: Run the test cases and record results.
5. Analyze results: Analyze the test results to identify defects and document them.
6. Report and retest
Benefits of System Testing:

● Improved software quality and reliability.


● Early detection of system-level defects.
● Reduced risk of post-release issues.
● Increased user satisfaction.

Verification and Validation:

Feature Verification Validation

Focus Building the product right Building the right product

Goal Ensure product meets Ensure product meets user needs


specifications and requirements and solves the intended problem

Timing During development and testing During final testing or after product
phases release

Methods Inspections, reviews, static User testing, acceptance testing,


testing (code analysis) dynamic testing (functionality)

Aim Find and fix defects early in the Ensure product acceptance and
development process usefulness for end-users

Responsibility Developers and testers Users, stakeholders, product owners

Perspective Internal (developer/tester External (user/stakeholder


viewpoint) viewpoint)
Risk Management

Concept:

● Identifying, assessing, and controlling potential threats to an organization.


● Minimizing negative impacts on financial, legal, operational, and strategic goals.

Steps:

1. Identify Risks: Recognize potential threats and vulnerabilities.


2. Analyze Risks: Assess the likelihood and impact of each risk.
3. Prioritize Risks: Focus on the most critical risks first.
4. Develop Strategies: Implement actions to mitigate or avoid risks.
5. Monitor & Review: Continuously track and evaluate the effectiveness of risk
management efforts.

Key Tools:

● Risk registers: Documenting identified risks and mitigation plans.


● Impact-probability matrix: Prioritizing risks based on severity and likelihood.
● Risk mitigation strategies: Avoidance, transfer, reduction, acceptance.
● Monitoring and reporting: Track progress and adapt strategies as needed.

Benefits:

● Increased awareness of potential threats.


● Proactive measures to protect against losses.
● Improved decision-making and resource allocation.
● Enhanced business continuity and resilience.
Cyclomatic Complexity

Concept:

● Measures the potential complexity of a code block based on the number of


independent paths through it.
● Higher complexity signifies more decision points and potentially harder-to-test
and maintain code.

Impact:

● Readability: Complex code is harder to understand and follow.


● Maintainability: Difficult to modify and adapt without introducing errors.
● Testability: Requires more test cases to cover all execution paths.
● Bug susceptibility: Code with intricate logic is more prone to bugs.

Calculation:

● Based on control flow elements like if, switch, and loops.


● Formula: number of decision points + 1
● Aim for low complexity values (ideally < 7) for easier code management.

Benefits of Managing Complexity:

● Improves code quality and maintainability.


● Reduces testing effort and increases test coverage.
● Minimizes bug introduction and simplifies debugging.
● Enhances overall software reliability and performance.
Comparison of faults, failures, and errors in software development:

Feature Fault Failure Error

Definition Defect or flaw in the code Deviation from expected Human mistake or incorrect
or system design behavior or incorrect result action

Cause Programming mistakes, Triggered by a fault Misunderstanding,


design flaws, external misinterpretation, or oversight
factors

Timing Exists within the system Occurs during execution, Can happen during any phase
before execution often due to a fault of development or operation

Visibility Not always immediately Observable and often May be visible or hidden,
visible impacts user experience depending on the context

Impact Potential to cause failures Directly affects system Can lead to faults, failures, or
performance other issues

Prevention Thorough testing, code Fault prevention and Training, process improvements,
reviews, design practices mitigation strategies attention to detail

Correction Debugging, code changes, Troubleshooting, fault Retraining, process


design modifications identification and repair adjustments, error handling
mechanisms

Importance Root cause of failures Visible symptoms of Common cause of faults and
underlying problems failures
Testing in SDLC:
Importance:
● Ensures software quality, functionality, and user experience.
● Identifies and fixes bugs before release.
● Protects against unexpected behavior and security vulnerabilities.

Stages:

● Requirement Analysis: Test requirements for clarity, completeness, and


feasibility.
● Design: Identify testable design elements and potential risks.
● Development: Conduct unit testing to verify individual code modules.
● Integration: Test component interaction and data flow between modules.
● System Testing: Verify overall functionality and performance against
requirements.
● Acceptance Testing: Users confirm the system meets their needs and
expectations.

Types of Testing:

● Functional: Test all system functionalities based on requirements.


● Non-functional: Test system performance, usability, accessibility, and security.
● White-box: Developers test code internals with knowledge of its structure.
● Black-box: Testers test without knowledge of code internals.
● Manual: Performed by humans following test plans and scripts.
● Automated: Utilizes tools and scripts for repetitive tasks.

Benefits:

● Improves software quality and reliability.


● Reduces post-release defects and maintenance costs.
● Enhances user satisfaction and business success.
Exhaustive Testing: Impossible and Impractical
While aiming for comprehensive coverage, exhaustive testing, encompassing all
possible system states and inputs, is conceptually impractical and infeasible in most
software development contexts.

● Goal: Test every possible input and system state.


● Why impossible:
○ Infinite possibilities: Many systems have an unlimited number of input
combinations and states.
○ Resource limitations: Time, budget, and technology constraints wouldn't
allow covering all possibilities.
○ Evolving systems: Systems constantly change, making exhaustive testing
a moving target.
● Alternatives:
○ Focus on critical areas: Prioritize testing based on risk, user impact, and
functionality.
○ Utilize diverse testing methods: Combine multiple testing techniques to
increase coverage.
○ Embrace automation: Automate repetitive tasks to improve efficiency.
● Benefits of abandoning exhaustive testing:
○ Feasibility: Allows for realistic project timelines and resource allocation.
○ Focus on effectiveness: Targets areas with the most impact on quality.
○ Constant improvement: Encourages adaptation to changing systems and
requirements.
Debugging
Concept:
● Identifying and resolving errors (bugs) in programs or systems.
● Goal: Fix malfunctions and ensure proper functionality.

Techniques:

● Interactive debugging: Step through code, examine variables, and analyze


execution behavior.
● Log analysis: Identify error messages and suspicious activity in logs.
● Profiling: Analyze resource usage and performance bottlenecks.
● Dump analysis: Inspect memory dumps for corrupted data or unexpected values.
● Debugging tools: Utilize specialized software for inspecting program states and
manipulating execution.
● Testing and code inspection: Identify edge cases and potential error sources.

Key factors:

● Problem identification: Clearly understand the symptoms and impact of the bug.
● Root cause analysis: Isolate the source of the error within the code or system.
● Solution implementation: Fix the code, modify configuration, or adjust settings.
● Testing and verification: Validate the fix and ensure it doesn't introduce new
errors.

Benefits:

● Improved software quality and reliability.


● Reduced post-release defects and maintenance costs.
● Enhanced user experience and satisfaction.
● Increased programmer skill and understanding of code behavior.
Structural Vs Functional Testing

Feature Structural Testing Functional Testing

Focus Internal structure and logic of the code External behavior and functionality of the system

Goal Ensure code correctness and coverage Verify system functions as expected from the
user's perspective

Timing Usually conducted during development Often performed during integration and system
phases testing phases

Tester's Requires knowledge of code structure Does not require knowledge of internal code
knowledge and implementation implementation

Techniques White-box testing methods: unit testing, Black-box testing methods: requirements-based,
code coverage analysis use case, scenario testing

Test cases Derived from code structure and control Derived from functional requirements and user
flow scenarios

Tools Code coverage analyzers, debuggers Test management tools, test automation tools

Examples Unit testing, path testing, data flow testing System testing, integration testing, user
acceptance testing, regression testing

Limitations May not uncover all functional issues May not identify all code-level defects

Strengths Detects hidden defects early Ensures system meets user needs and objectives
Equivalence Class Testing, Boundary Value Analysis, and Decision Table

1. Equivalence Class Testing (ECT):

● Divides input data into classes that are expected to produce similar outputs.
● Selects one test case from each class to represent its behavior.
● Goal: Reduce the number of test cases while maintaining coverage.

Example: Testing a login form:

○ Valid username/password combinations (one test case)


○ Invalid username/password combinations (one test case)
○ Empty fields (one test case)

2. Boundary Value Analysis (BVA):

● Focuses on testing boundaries or edges of input and output ranges.


● Targets common error areas near these boundaries.
● Chooses test cases at, just below, and just above boundaries.

Example: Testing a temperature sensor's behavior at its minimum, maximum, and


normal operating temperatures.

3. Decision Table Testing:

● Represents complex logic with a table of conditions and actions.


● Identifies test cases for different combinations of conditions.
● Ensures coverage of all possible decision paths.

Example: Testing a shopping cart's behavior based on payment type, shipping options,
and discount codes.
Mutation Testing, Data Flow Testing & Path Testing: A Brief Comparison

1. Mutation Testing:

● Concept: Modifies ("mutates") small parts of the code and checks if existing tests
can detect these changes.
● Goal: Assess the effectiveness of existing test cases in identifying bugs.
● Benefits:
○ Uncovers hidden defects missed by traditional testing.
○ Improves test suite comprehensiveness.
○ Identifies areas where tests are weak or missing.
● Challenges:
○ Expensive and time-consuming due to the large number of mutations
generated.
○ Can be difficult to interpret results and distinguish valid mutations from
actual bugs.

2. Data Flow Testing:

● Concept: Examines the flow of data through variables and control structures
within the code.
● Goal: Ensure proper processing and manipulation of data throughout the
program.
● Benefits:
○ Detects issues with data initialization, usage, and manipulation.
○ Improves data integrity and program robustness.
○ Can be automated for efficient testing.
● Challenges:
○ May not uncover logic or functionality errors not related to data flow.
○ Can be complex to apply to intricate programs.
3. Path Testing:

● Concept: Traces all possible execution paths through the code based on control
flow (e.g., loops,branches).
● Goal: Ensure all paths are tested at least once to achieve complete coverage.
● Benefits:
○ Reduces chances of untested scenarios leading to defects.
○ Provides a systematic approach to test coverage.
○ Can be combined with other methods for better testing robustness.
● Challenges:
○ May be impractical for programs with a large number of paths.
○ Can overlook boundary values or edge cases outside the identified paths.
Levels of Testing
Software goes through several "levels" of testing before it's released to the world. Each
level focuses on different aspects and catches different types of issues. Here's a quick
rundown:

1. Unit Testing:

● Focus: Testing individual code units (functions, modules) in isolation.


● Done by: Developers themselves.
● Catches: Basic coding errors, logic flaws within small code pieces.

2. Integration Testing:

● Focus: Testing how different modules interact and work together.


● Done by: Testers or developers (depending on project).
● Catches: Interface issues, data flow problems between modules.

3. System Testing:

● Focus: Testing the entire system as a whole against user requirements and
functionality.
● Done by: Dedicated testers.
● Catches: Overall system behavior issues, missing features, performance
bottlenecks.

4. Acceptance Testing:

● Focus: Final validation by end-users or stakeholders to ensure the system meets


their needs.
● Done by: Users or representatives (e.g., QA team).
● Catches: Usability issues, non-compliance with user expectations, real-world
usage problems.
Scaffolding in software testing
Concept: Temporary code or structure supporting testing efforts. Think of it like
construction scaffolding - facilitates access and simplifies tasks for testers.

● Purpose:
○ Isolate individual units for efficient testing.
○ Simulate missing dependencies (external services, unavailable modules).
○ Control test environments and data scenarios.
○ Inject faults for robustness testing.
○ Automate repetitive test setup and teardown.
● Benefits:
○ Early testing independent of other components.
○ Focused testing on specific areas.
○ Consistent and reproducible test environments.
○ Streamlined testing workflow through automation.
○ Enhanced test coverage reaching difficult areas.
● Examples:
○ Mock objects for external services or databases.
○ Test harnesses for executing and managing test cases.
○ Data generators for creating test data sets.
○ Test hooks for injecting faults or monitoring internal states.

Stubs & Drivers in Unit Testing:


● Stubs:
○ Replace dependencies unavailable during unit testing (e.g., external
services, databases).
○ Simplified versions, focusing on functionality needed for testing the unit.
○ Why use them:
■ Isolate units for independent testing.
■ Control specific behavior and responses.
■ Avoid external dependencies delaying or complicating testing.
● Drivers:
○ Simulate interactions with an external system in unit tests.
○ Provide input data and trigger specific behavior in the unit being tested.
○ Why use them:
■ Test behavior of units interacting with external systems.
■ Verify how the unit handles different inputs and scenarios.
■ Avoid real-world dependencies during unit testing.
Robust and Worst-Case Testing:

Feature Robust Testing Worst-Case Testing

Focus System's ability to handle System's behavior under the most


invalid or unexpected inputs extreme or stressful conditions

Goal Ensure resilience and prevent Identify potential vulnerabilities


crashes or unexpected behavior and performance bottlenecks

Test cases Include invalid data, extreme Focus on combinations of inputs


values, unusual combinations that push the system to its limits

Techniques Boundary value analysis, error Combinatorial testing, load testing,


guessing, stress testing stress testing

Benefits Improves robustness, data Reveals weaknesses, prevents


integrity, error handling failures in critical scenarios

Challenges Identifying all possible invalid Determining the most critical


inputs and edge cases combinations of inputs and
conditions

Use cases Input validation, exception Performance testing, load testing,


handling, security testing safety-critical systems testing

Timing Often conducted during system Usually conducted later in the


testing or acceptance testing testing cycle, after functional
testing
Alpha and Beta Testing:

Feature Alpha Testing Beta Testing

Goal Identify major defects and Gather user feedback and test in real-world
usability issues early on environments

Timing Conducted internally, often near Conducted with a limited external audience before full
the end of development release

Testers Internal employees, developers, Selected external users, potential customers, and
QA team stakeholders

Environment Controlled, simulated Real-world settings, users' own devices and


environment environments

Focus Functionality, stability, core User experience, usability, compatibility, performance,


features feedback

Feedback Internal reports, bug tracking User surveys, bug reports, social media, forums,
systems support channels

Deliverables List of bugs, potential User feedback, usage data, insights for final product
improvements refinement

Importance Saves time and cost by catching Improves user satisfaction, reduces post-release
major issues early problems, gathers valuable feedback
Regression and Progression Testing:

Feature Regression Testing Progression Testing

Goal Ensure existing functionality Verify new features and


still works after changes enhancements work as intended

Timing Conducted after any code Conducted during development of


modifications, updates, or new features or enhancements
fixes

Test cases Focus on previously tested Focus on recently added or modified


functionality features

Techniques Re-running existing test Creating new test cases, exploratory


cases, automated regression testing, user acceptance testing
suites

Benefits Prevents regressions (new Ensures new features meet


bugs in old code) requirements and expectations

Challenges Maintaining a large test suite, Developing test cases for evolving
identifying affected areas requirements, managing scope
creep

Importance Safeguards against Guarantees quality and usability of


unintended side effects of new functionality
changes
Static Testing in a Nutshell:

Concept: Analyzing software without actually executing it.

Methods:

● Reviews: Scrutinizing documents like requirements, design, and code for errors,
inconsistencies, and risks. ️‍♀️
● Static Analysis: Utilizing automated tools to scan code for potential problems like
coding errors, security vulnerabilities, and stylistic inconsistencies.

Benefits:

● Early Defect Detection: Catches issues early, saving time and cost compared to
fixing them later. ⏱️
● Improved Quality: Leads to more robust and reliable software.
● Enhances Security: Identifies potential security vulnerabilities before they can be
exploited. ️
● Promotes Code Maintainability: Makes code easier to understand and modify. ️

Techniques:

● Code Reviews: Manually examining code by other developers. ‍


● Style Checker: Enforces coding standards and conventions.
● Lint: Flags suspicious constructs and potential errors.
● Data Flow Analysis: Traces data manipulation through the code to identify
potential issues.
● Control Flow Analysis: Examines branching and looping logic to uncover
potential inconsistencies.
GUI Testing: A Quick Rundown

Focus: Testing the Graphical User Interface (GUI) of an application, ensuring it's usable,
functional, and visually appealing.

What it Checks:

● Functionality: Button clicks, text input, menu navigation, interaction with


elements.
● Usability: Ease of use, layout, intuitiveness, accessibility for diverse users.
● Visuals: Aesthetics, consistency, responsiveness, clarity of information.
● Compatibility: Cross-browser, cross-device behavior, different resolutions.

Techniques:

● Black-box testing: User-centric approach, focusing on how the system behaves


from the user's perspective.
● White-box testing: Internal structure-based approach, examining code and logic
behind the GUI elements.
● Automated testing: Utilizing tools to record and replay user actions, ensuring
consistency and efficiency.
● Manual testing: Exploratory testing by humans to discover unexpected issues
and edge cases.

Benefits:

● Improved user experience: Ensures smooth and intuitive interaction with the
software.
● Reduced post-release defects: Catches UI bugs early, saving time and
resources.
● Enhanced brand image: Presents a professional and polished interface.
● Increased user satisfaction: Leads to better adoption and user loyalty.
V-Model in Software Testing with a diagram and key points:

Diagram:

Key Points:

● Structure: Visually represented as a "V," with development phases on the left


descending and corresponding testing phases on the right ascending.
● Sequential Approach: Emphasizes early testing and verification throughout the
development lifecycle.
● Phase Alignment: Each development phase has a corresponding testing phase,
ensuring testing is planned and executed alongside development.
● Verification vs. Validation: Left side focuses on verification (ensuring system is
built correctly), while right side focuses on validation (ensuring system meets
user requirements).
Phases:

1. Requirements Analysis: Define and document system requirements.


2. System Design: Create high-level architecture and design.
3. Architecture Design: Break down system into modules and components.
4. Module Design: Design individual modules with detailed specifications.
5. Coding: Implement code for each module.
6. Unit Testing: Test individual code units to ensure functionality.
7. Module Testing: Test integrated modules to ensure they work together.
8. Integration Testing: Combine modules to test overall system functionality.
9. System Testing: Test the complete system against requirements.
10. Acceptance Testing: Validate system with end-users to ensure it meets
expectations.

Benefits:

● Early defect detection and prevention.


● Clear mapping of testing activities to development phases.
● Improved communication and collaboration between developers and testers.
● Enhanced traceability of requirements to test cases.
● Structured approach to software quality assurance.

Limitations:

● Can be rigid for iterative or agile development processes.


● May not be suitable for projects with frequent changes or uncertainties.
● Requires careful planning and synchronization of activities.

You might also like